Commons:Кандидате пентру имаджини ексчеленте

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Дакэ консидери кэ ексистэ о фотографйе пе Коммонс суфичиент де атрактивэ ка сэ се афле пе паджина Commons:Имаджини ексчеленте, атунчи те ругэм инклуде-о ын листа де кандидате едитынд ачеастэ паджинэ. Дакэ ексистэ ун консенс дженерал дупэ 15 зиле, имаджинеа ва фи трансфератэ ла Commons:Имаджини ексчеленте.

Contents

Пропунери[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Panorama vom Bürgerturm Gotha.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2016 at 13:31:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view (approximately 290°) from the Bürgertirm near Gotha in Thuringia. The full panoramic view of 360° is prevented by trees on the Krahnberg-Summit

File:Iglesia de San Pedro, Ariza, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 102.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2016 at 12:46:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Pedro in Ariza, Spain
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Smial -- Smial (talk) 12:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Smial (talk) 12:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The church of St Peter, patron saint of Ariza, is of Herrerian style and was built in 1620. Poco2 12:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you Smial for digging this original FPC out! Poco2 12:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 12:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Awesome photograph. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - As Johann said. I love all those diagonals, the tiles, etc., etc. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jebulon (talk) 16:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Love the tones and textures. Could be sharper, though. Daniel Case (talk) 16:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Umland -- 2014 -- 10.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2016 at 07:39:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Morning mist in Welte, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I very much like the mood. Created and uploaded by XRay - nominated by Code -- Code (talk) 07:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Code (talk) 07:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support @XRay: Is there any way you could remove the jet trail at top left? This would be even better without that. INeverCry 08:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry Thanks for your advice. Jet trail and bird (on the right) removed - and a better resolution. Thanks to Code for nominating! :-) --XRay talk 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Gorgeous. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 12:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wonderful light. --Laitche (talk) 15:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely mood. Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Daurian redstart (female) in Sakai, Osaka, February 2016 II.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2016 at 02:34:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Daurian redstart (female)

File:Little grebe in Sakai, Osaka, February 2016.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2016 at 02:34:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Little grebe

File:Erechtheum Acropolis Athens.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2016 at 22:41:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Erechtheum
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 22:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support View of the western side of the Erechtheum, with the famous caryatids, and the Athena olive tree. No tourists and interesting sky on the Acropolis, Athens, Greece.-- Jebulon (talk) 22:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 23:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 02:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 02:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Well done, definitely a QI, but ultimately doesn't stand out enough to me for such a heavily photographed structure. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Heavily photographed structure indeed,but less than the Eiffel Tower for instance (what extraordinary ?), and judged as the most valued image of his category in VIC...--Jebulon (talk) 11:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Difficult. It's good, but IMO the right wall is a bit overexposed and DoF could be a little bit better (f/10, f/11). --XRay talk 07:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
    • White stones are modern reconstruction stones. It is on purpose. Please see Anastylosis.--Jebulon (talk) 11:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Venerable. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel Case. --Karelj (talk) 12:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 12:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Chac Mool, Teotihuacán.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2016 at 11:47:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Way below FP standard, as per Code. Also overexposed foreground. Yann (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Isbjerget.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2016 at 10:27:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 10:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 10:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment What do you really wanted to capture? The funny but coincidently cloud formation or the architecture of the houses? The composition is quite strange to me --Hubertl 14:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I similarly question this composition. I like the buildings but would recommend for you to take a photo with a plainer sky or one with clouds higher above the buildings, because the buildings are quite complex in terms of form and the placement of the cloud feels distracting, rather than enriching. By the way, this is probably the first time I've posted something that could be interpreted as a "too busy" remark, but I don't think the picture is really overly complex; it's more a question of the placement of the cloud, relative to the buildings. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please check your "permissions" template. You require the CC BY-SA 4.0 to be mentioned but the picture is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. --Code (talk) 15:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I very much like this image, but there's the issue of the possible crop off the top as well as the licensing has not been addressed as of this writing. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
    • The Licensing is now fixed it is under CC BY-SA 3.0. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:St Peter's Church Nave 2, Drogheda, Ireland - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2016 at 08:15:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St Peter's Church Nave 2, Drogheda, Ireland
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info If you take a careful look you can see both Diliff and the pope on this picture. Created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Code -- Code (talk) 08:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Code (talk) 08:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Splendid. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pfoah! Mehr will ich nicht sagen... --Hubertl 14:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Hubertl. --Cayambe (talk) 18:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pratically all pictures of Diliff are featurable. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 21:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 02:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 02:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Awesome. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not natural colors, looks as overprocessed. --Karelj (talk) 12:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:The Assassination of President Lincoln - Currier and Ives 2.png[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2016 at 08:08:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Heraldy at the Castle of Good Hope.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2016 at 06:30:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gable of the Castle of Good Hope

File:Krokussen (Crocus), Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2016 at 19:13:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants Crocus #Family Iridaceae.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cheerful spring flowering in the sun. Krokussen (Crocus), Location, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 19:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 19:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely colors. INeverCry 20:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per INeverCry. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good quality and really well composed! --Hubertl 21:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The dark background has been lifted too much in post, I reckon, leading to a very noisy image visible at screen size. At only 3.5MP this isn't among our finest photographs. Despite the pretty flowers nicely arranged, technical quality is required to be at professional level. -- Colin (talk) 21:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
@Colin: If only you'd said "I reckon" in your comment on my last FPC, there's no way I could've gotten so pissy... Face-tongue.svg INeverCry 07:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Well, now I look at the EXIF, if removed the "I reckon". Vibrance +25, Exposure +0.20ev, Contrast +25, Shadows +100, Blacks +100, Clarity +31. These are all the reasons why the image is so noisy: it has been pushed considerably in post. -- Colin (talk) 14:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Famberhorst, could you possibly undo some of this? I like the photo, but if it could be improved, that would be great. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Answer: ll try what the noise suppressing.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done Noise reduction. May also get some cut above and below. --Famberhorst (talk) 06:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
I reckon you done fixed it up now y'all. Face-tongue.svg INeverCry 07:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- per Colin -- Scewing (talk) 22:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Owain Knight (talk) 22:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I understand that this is a small file, but to me, it's a much better picture than big ones that are mostly blurred, including some of the subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 16:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Schloss Johannisberg, South view 20140916 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2016 at 18:41:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Schloss Johannisberg as seen from south
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by DXR - uploaded by DXR - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMHO a beautiful composition: vineyard combined with an interesting well lit building and well arranged clear lines. Quality is at a very high level. -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 20:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive view. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - What the others said. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 02:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, but the small blurred bird should be removed. --XRay talk 07:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. I do not see reason for FP. --Karelj (talk) 11:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:El verde en mi país es mas bonito.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2016 at 18:18:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reptile of Venezuela
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by GleyderKarina - uploaded by GleyderKarina - nominated by Oscar . -- Oscar_. (talk) 18:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Oscar_. (talk) 18:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, far no FP-Quality. Too noisy though a wonderful motif.--Hubertl 19:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hubertl; also the lizard's head/upper body seems to be in the dark compared to its arm. INeverCry 20:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Way too noisy and over-saturated. I suggest avoiding the "Vivid" setting on the camera. -- Colin (talk) 21:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Totally per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because of the reasons people posted above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Личинка белокрылки.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2016 at 11:47:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Greenhouse whitefly larva

File:Una cena en Joyuda, Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2016 at 10:17:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Delicious evening; beautiful view
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It is the capture of the after-sunset moment from a parallactic angle of 90°, which can only occur two times a year and solely in regions within the Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn. At this instant, which lasts here about 22 mins, atmospheric refractions displace the ubiquitous blue, reveal the imposing Venus and give way to a gamma of hues hidden at other times but in twilights. Venus stands alone because Mars is dimmer from this angle, and Jupiter only nears Venus the closest in September. Two minutes earlier, and the image would have appeared even sharper, but it could have missed Venus. -- Caballero1967 19:35, 12 February 2016‎
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Until you straighten the horizon. It´s flooding the arctic sea right now! --Hubertl 21:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sloping horizon. Not sharp. The pier isn't quite working the way it should on a photo like this. I'm not convinced the sky is that unusual. Sunsets are pretty, but there's nothing photographically or artistically special here. -- Colin (talk) 21:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed Thanks! The new one above is the straightest I could get from the various applications I tried. Please, consider two issues. First, the dock's slight orientation south, contingent on the beach's position, causes an inverse slim tilting illusion of the horizon. To complicate perspective even further, the slightly cloudy north erases the horizon's line, thus magnifying the illusion. Take a look at the patterned pic below. Cheers, --Caballero//Historiador 22:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Still unsharp, and that light on the dock looks a little unnatural and distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 23:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed Thanks. Took your suggestions in and tried improving it. Let me know, please. --Caballero//Historiador 05:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This has gone from 4mb to 178kb somehow, and is now a run of the mill web-res sunset. The original had no wow factor either really, so not a big loss, but how do you cut 75% off of an image's size with a simple rotation of a couple degrees, then nearly quarter it again with a crop and some strange light adjustments? Next it'll be a 50kb thumb... INeverCry 07:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination

File:2015.08.19.-01-Mannheim Vogelstang--Hauhechel-Blaeuling-Maennchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 15:18:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Grant E., Hamilton, Their New Jerusalem, 1892 Cornell CUL PJM 1111 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 14:52:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grant E., Hamilton, Their New Jerusalem, 1892: An anti-semitic cartoon from Judge Magazine.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Maps
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Grant E., Hamilton, Their New Jerusalem, 1892: An anti-semitic cartoon from Judge Magazine.- uploaded by EVDiam - nominated by EVDiam -- EVDiam (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- EVDiam (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very good condition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The restoration could be better. The large smudge under the title at top, the fold lines, the discoloration at bottom, and the numerous black spots could be cleaned up. INeverCry 05:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I miss a bit sharpness, but it´s ok. It´s a question, how much an restoring intervention should go. I prefer as little as possible. --Hubertl 10:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looking at it closer: crisp and clear! And very telling of a key period, despite of... --Caballero//Historiador 12:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 15:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2015 G5.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 11:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Large-leaved Lupine

File:CDU Wahlkampfplakat - kaspl010.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 09:18:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Alle Wege des Marxismus führen nach Moskau"
"All Marxist paths lead to Moscow! Therefore CDU" - This campaign poster, created for the West German federal elections of 1953, certainly ranks among Germany's most iconic political posters of the postwar period. It highlights Konrad Adenauer's stern anticommunist course, here directly aimed at the Social Democrats, then the leading party of the parliamentary opposition.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support- EVDiam (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Is the white scuffing part of the original poster design? INeverCry 05:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting info.svg Info to my knowledge it is --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
        • I guess I can't fault you for a bad choice made by the designers. Funny that Marx himself was anti-Russian... Face-wink.svg INeverCry 07:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 07:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • {{Neutral}} for a poster, the pixel size is too small for me.--Hubertl 10:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed Hubertl, Du hattest recht, da ging noch mehr... ;-) --KAS-ACDP (talk) 11:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pugilist (talk) 10:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok now for me! --Hubertl 11:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looking forward for more high res material from KAS-ACDP. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 12:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Wolfsberg Thuern 1 Schloss Thuern mit Weinberg 08012016 2623.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 10:31:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle Thuern with vineyard at Thuern, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria

File:Victor Hugo by Étienne Carjat 1876 - full.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 22:48:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Victor Hugo by Étienne Carjat, 1876
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Étienne Carjat - uploaded & nominated by Scewing
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Scewing (talk) 22:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'm not sure about this one. It's a small file for a featured picture nomination, and it's apparent even at thumbnail size that M. Hugo's right side (to the viewer's left) is blurry. If that's in the original photo and this file is faithful to that photo, we should probably approve featuring it, because of the author's importance and his compelling facial expression, but I think I'll leave that judgment up to others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ah, le voilà! --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 09:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • {o} No improvements since the previous nomination. I guess this is the Bonhams version, a downsampled copy of the Carjat Gallica's version, which has a higher size. Good restoration though--Jebulon (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info Actually, I spent several hours restoring it since the previous nomination. Per your suggestion, I went through and eliminated literally thousands of white spots. Previous entry was this, current entry is this. Scewing (talk) 22:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I also wanted to point out that, as you correctly guessed, this image is a restoration of the woodburytype sold by Bonham's auction house in 2011. The Bonham's woodburytype is not a downsampled copy of the woodburytype owned by BNF's Gallica, they are two separate woodburytypes of the same image. I chose to restore the Bonham's version, despite it's smaller scan size, because in my opinion the Bonham's woodburytype has deteriorated less in its 140 year history compared to the Gallica version. The detail of Victor Hugo's eyes and face were much cleaner in the Bonham's version in my opinion, so I decided to restore that one. BTW, I'm a big fan of all your images! Keep up the good work. Scewing (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Very convincing, opposition removed, support instead. Bon appétit, messieurs, ô ministres intègres, conseillers vertueux !--Jebulon (talk) 16:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 28-30 PAN.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 03:13:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 28-30 PAN.JPG
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 03:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I Symbol support vote.svg Support this, but I really wish it went a little further to the right, so that the stones didn't have to be cut off, if possible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
    Hi Ikan Kekek, I've uploaded a new version with a more generous crop on the right. Poco2 11:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Thank you. I do think that improves the photo some. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Ares Tower Vienna from SW on 2015-07-10.png[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 22:18:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ares Tower Vienna from SW
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Ares Tower Vienna from SW, created by Rftblr - uploaded by Rftblr - nominated by -- Hubertl 22:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hubertl 22:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Imposing building. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Good portrait of a building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Not sure. The quality is very good but I think the light situation is not as good as I would expect it from a FP. Also, the composition is more or less boring. I'll take another look in the next days. --Code (talk) 06:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • For what it's worth, I find the composition alright, because it's the one big building with its supporting cast, and to my eyes, the smaller buildings relate formally to the big one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose high quality, but it lacks something that would make me go "Wow!". Sorry, but that's what QI is for, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 08:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. No reason for FP. --Karelj (talk) 15:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Enough for me. A little cooler on the WB than I'd have it, but that's understandable given the predominant blue and green tones, especially on the top. Daniel Case (talk) 19:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting cube! --Laitche (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Nothing special in this type of architecture. - Owain Knight (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect angle, perfect picture. The architecture is actually quite unique. --Caballero//Historiador 06:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Ethel Franklin Betts, Save the Survivors, 1918 Cornell CUL PJM 2029 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2016 at 14:53:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ethel Franklin Betts, Save the Survivors, 1918
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Save the Survivors - 3,950,000 Starving PeopleWhere the Victims Are: Campaign for $30,000,000, 1918:Poster from the special campaign of the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief (renamed by 1916 the American Committee for Relief in the Near East, which worked energetically throughout the war to raise funds and provide relief.- uploaded by EVDiam - nominated by User:EVDiam -- EVDiam (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- EVDiam (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Important document in excellent condition and very important to share widely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per everyone else. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Given that it's a two-dimensional image without any photographic elements, have we thought about having a .png version so there's no compression loss, and to take up less memory? Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:BD Bacatá en construcción.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 13:36:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

BD Bacatá under construction

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment We need a category mrtony77 --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not sure that worked right, but I added the category. --mrtony77 (talk) 02:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overprocessed (CA visible on building's roofline) and even if it weren't there's just too much going on here for the intended perspective to work. Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Quite honestly, I find nothing special about this photo. It's got a weird angle and a couple of random-seeming crops, and the netting is very distracting in the context of this composition. I'm sorry; I know I may sound mean, and I feel a little like a jerk giving this feedback, but that's the way I feel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel. INeverCry 03:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, far away from fulfilling any quality standards. Even not QI IMO. --Hubertl 11:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Lift Seceda Gherdëina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 10:45:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chairlift and skiing on the mount Secëda in Val Gardena
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment When I was thinking of what someone might object to, the crop on the left side where the chairlift is occurred to me. My feeling is that in order to have an entire post near the left side of his image without having no space between it and the edge of the picture frame, he probably had to cut off part of its mechanism. Is that what you're seeing, or is it something else? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks for answering, Wolfgang. Yes, the cropped mechanism is my main concern.--Jebulon (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Bel bianco --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Super strong support Well-composed, excellent quality, gorgeous atmosphere. A desired Hollyday scenery and a POFY finalist for me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    • You Brazilian ! Face-smile.svg I mean: that's a common scenery in our old Europe...--Jebulon (talk) 17:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 08:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sea of clouds has wow all by itself, great perspective, and per Ikan there was really no way to crop on the left that would have not been at least slightly awkward. Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 10:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good. --Pugilist (talk) 10:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:MANNapoli 9058 couple painting.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 09:54:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Terentius Neo and his wife
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by an unknown pompeian painter, the rest by me -- Jebulon (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I remain in the antique ages, with this nice, beautiful, and interesting fresco from a house in Pompeii, in the 4th style, depicting a pair of middle-class Pompeian, certainly husband and wife. It was placed on the back wall of the house, so as to be visible to anyone who transited to the atrium. It shows the baker Terentius Neo, as revealed by the engraved inscription inside the house, and not, as has been by mistake felt for a long time, Paquius Proculus, whose name appears in an electoral inscription painted on an outside wall. The two persons are portrayed as wealthy refined, cultured and fashionable: the woman is wearing a red robe, a pearl necklace with pendant in gold and pearls in the ears, has the typical Nero-era hairstyle (her hair divided by a parted in the middle and tied back, except for tight curls that fall on the forehead), and flaunts culture holding a diptych of wax tablets and a stylus, the same attitude of the so-called "Sappho fresco". The baker wears the toga, that indicates the dignity of magistratuus, and clearly highlights the rotulus (the document certifying his social rank) . All of this is a bit "too much". The current interpretation is that, despite everything, the facial features, made by the author with deliberate loyalty, betray the provincial origin of two upstarts, probably of Samnite origin who, once conquered the economic well-being, aspire to hide their humble beginnings and become a full right in polite society. Found in Pompeii, ca.79 CE, now on display in the National Archaeological Museum of Naples, Italy.-- Jebulon (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 10:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Wonderful painting, excellent documentation and photography. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 10:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support-EVDiam (talk) 14:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Owain Knight (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Magnifique. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seems to be the best version of this that we have. Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Jaguar (Panthera onca palustris) male Rio Negro 2.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 06:41:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jaguar (Panthera onca palustris) male yawning, Rio Negro, the Pantanal, Brazil
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Based on my reading of Category:Panthera onca, there are currently only 2 Featured Pictures of jaguars - one of which is a head shot, and the other, a body picture far inferior to this one and also taken at a zoo. The entire animal is quite sharp in this picture, and even at full size, the entire picture is quite easily viewable, without bokeh that blurs anything anywhere close to unrecognizably. At full-page size, the entire composition is clearly in view, with a foreground, middleground and background - a very good composition, too, in my opinion - showing the jaguar in its habitat. I'd love to see more wildlife pictures like this, and I'll be surprised if anyone votes to oppose featuring this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect snapshot. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I know you mean that comment positively, but to me, this picture is way more than just a snapshot. Look at that composition! Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support he's yawning for the camera. Charles (talk) 07:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    Here, kitty, kitty, kitty. :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 09:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for your contribution to the Brazilian fauna. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportEVDiam (talk) 15:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support An animal-in-environment picture that works as an FP. The pose can't be beat ("Oh my, grandma, what large teeth you have!"), the animal's in focus, and while there are some spots in the background where the limitations of such a small image are evident they are so small as to not matter. Daniel Case (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support even if you did slag off my jaguar! :D -- KTC (talk) 01:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Rather small. Is this a crop? --Code (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Yes, this image is cropped. Taken from a small boat with 400mm lens on a monopod. The guides do not like to get too close. As a result, I had around 5 minutes to observe and photograph - waiting for him to yawn! Charles (talk) 15:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Šopsko kolo, XVIII Duna.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 20:39:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT Šopsko kolo, XVIII Duna.jpg
Yes, however, look the weather conditions it's 7 pm (Budapest time and 1:30pm Venezuela time) and dancing!, it's not a building and you can't apply the same rule --The Photographer (talk) 00:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
I understand the challenge, but we're talking about a Featured Picture here. I think it should be more outstanding to be featured. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:St-Laurent-de-Belzagot 16 Paysage avec étang 2013.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 20:26:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St-Laurent-de-Belzagot 16 Paysage avec étang 2013.jpg
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by JLPC - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The picture is sharp and the countryside is pleasant, but I question the composition. For example, I don't like the way the road at the extreme right is cut off - it seems random to me. There might be a way to get a fine composition out of this with some other crop, but I'll leave that to you. As it is, I don't feel that it's an outstanding work that I can support featuring. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The "wow" on this is borderline for me, and if it were one of those super detailed panoramas I would be OK with it, but there is visible unsharpness at 100% on a 20 MP image. --King of ♠ 02:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 21:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan; I don't find the composition stimulating enough. It feels like one of those pictures that felt awesome when you took it but, when you look at later, is more like "oh". I guess the horizon line is too close to flat for me. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think it's really a nice picture and has high quality but it's somehow not extraordinary enough to become FP, I'm afraid. --Code (talk) 06:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan & KoH. INeverCry 03:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is one of those pics that soothes the hear. Perhaps the various greens with the blue clear sky. --Caballero//Historiador 06:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Homalocantha zamboi.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 20:22:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Homalocantha zamboi

File:2014.03.09.-23-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim-Fruehlings-Scharbockskraut.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 16:34:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Building in Paulista Avenue 09.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 13:37:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Building in Paulista Avenue, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Yes indeed. It reminds me of Mondrian. It's great how the air conditioners provide a rhythm to the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 23:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:W Hotel DC.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 12:50:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Hotel Washington (Washington, D.C.)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interior of the Hotel Washington (Washington, D.C.). Created by Jeffrey Totaro - originally uploaded by en:User:Hrboe - nominated by Storkk --Storkk (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Storkk (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Busy but inevitable. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - For a hotel lobby, that's not busy, as there are no guests in the picture! :-) But it has some compositional richness, and I like the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crops at the top (chandelier) and bottom left (table and chair) are quite awkward. --King of ♠ 01:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Owain Knight (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As I said before, more hotel lobbies please. Crop is a little awkward, but I can see how that might have been the lesser of two evils. Very well composed and done for a long exposure indoors with people in the background. Love the arcade ... not something you'd expect to see in a hotel lobby. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. No reason for FP. --Karelj (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, sharp, and good angle, but per opposers.--Jebulon (talk) 17:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per KoH. INeverCry 03:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the crop is unfavorable. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like the colors and very good quality but unattractive composition since too busy for me. --Laitche (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:תל מגידו.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 09:11:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view of Tel Megiddo, archaeological site in Israel.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Aerial view of Tel Megiddo, archaeological site in Israel. Created and uploaded by AVRAMGR. -- Triggerhippie4 (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Triggerhippie4 (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose seems overprocessed to me. --Hubertl 09:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- A unique picture - shows the place in the rare angle, at least in comparison to other pictures we have in Wikimedia projects. Ldorfman (talk) 14:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - A unique view should earn Valued Image status, but I question whether this is really featurable. You're familiar with this place; could you please tell us whether the vegetation we see in the near right and center really looks like that? And the other thing is that a lot of the picture is hazy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I am not convinced by image quality. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Chaotic composition makes it hard to focus on subject; off colors on top of hill and immediately behind. Daniel Case (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Owain Knight (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Owain Knight: Could you please explain why you oppose? Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Per Daniel. - Owain Knight (talk) 22:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel. INeverCry 03:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 217-219 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 02:41:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View during the blue hour of the church and Monastery of St. Francis, Quito, Ecuador. The Roman Catholic temple, finalized in the 16th-century, is the largest architetural ensemble among the historical structures of colonial Latin America. The church is also featured by the mixture of different architecture styles as its construction took 150 years.
Uoaei1: the roof on the left is (for real) not paralel to the roof on the right. Poco2 22:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ghosts on the stairs should (easily) be cloned out...--Jebulon (talk) 10:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

̈ːJebulonː all ghosts are now removed Poco2 11:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Pferdskopf (Rhön) im Winter 2016.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2016 at 11:42:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pferdskopf in the Rhön Mountains in Winter 2016
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jörg Braukmann - uploaded by Milseburg - nominated by Milseburg -- Milseburg (talk) 11:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 11:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice mood! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 17:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice light, colors, mood. --Laitche (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. Trivial composition, slight vignetting, a bit too much foreground. A good QI though.--Jebulon (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks washed out to me, and the composition should be wider. --King of ♠ 01:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - I agree with Jebulon, though also with Martin and Laitche. This is a clear photo, and I do agree with Martin and Laitche that it has a nice mood, but I don't find the composition great. I'm feeling neutral; I were really pushed, I might lean toward the "QI but not FP" side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon. Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Owain Knight (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon. --Karelj (talk) 21:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon. INeverCry 03:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ca. 10-15% less foreground and 30-50% moore place on right: that will be a good composition. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, PKW auf dem Parkplatz -- 2014 -- 0079.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2016 at 05:52:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

BMW 502 V8 in the parking lot of the airfield Borkenberge, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • @Golden Bosnian Lily: Please give me a reason for your contra. It's not just voting, a review or reason is usual especially for a contra. Thank you. --XRay talk 15:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 17:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reminds me of a picture I took of a BMW's tire and hubcap a few days ago that might (I hope) eventually turn up here. Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't see anything special in this. Sorry. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Radha and Krishna in the boat of love - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 23:04:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Radha and Krishna in the boat of love
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Unknown artist / Google Art Project, uploaded by Dcoetzee, nominated by Yann (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very high resolution of a traditional miniature from the Kishengarh school of paintings from Rajasthan. Radha Krishna are collectively known within Hinduism as the combination of both the feminine as well as the masculine aspects of God. See Radha Krishna for the details. -- Yann (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'd like to vote for this picture, but I find the documentation insufficient. A date or at least approximate date and, so far as is known, place of composition should be mentioned in the description. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As it concerns Radha and Krishna, it cannot be a physical place on earth, but it is meant to be a mystical one, maybe Shangri-La? So I imagine, the picture expresses more a state of the soul. Like a dreamland. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not asking what place is depicted; I'm asking when and where it was painted. That, or at least as near as we can tell, should be included in the documentation. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • OK, updated from GAP. Yann (talk) 10:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank you, and Symbol support vote.svg Support. I still have a question, though: It looks like there is writing in Urdu or another Arabic-based language on the bottom of the painting. Do you have any idea why, given that this is a pointedly Hindu religious subject? Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Not sure (I don't read Urdu), but Urdu was the lingua franca for scholars in India until the 1920s (or even the 1940s?). Regards, Yann (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 09:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- EVDiam (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Exquisite. Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Owain Knight (talk) 18:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Owain Knight: Could you please explain why you oppose? Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The figures are too small in the overall composition. - Owain Knight (talk) 22:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
        • Owain Knight: we can't change it. This is a 360 years old work. Yann (talk) 10:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
          • User:Yann, I don't expect you can change it. The question is whether it should be featured? You mean that all older works have small figures that make them almost unrecognizable? - Owain Knight (talk) 10:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
            • Owain Knight: Did you realize that this is file nearly 700 megapixels? This is more than 20 times the picture size of an average camera. You can very well recognize them. Yann (talk) 10:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
              • User:Yann And how many people are going to click that? The picture is going to be featured on multiple Wikipedias in smaller version than here that we vote on. - Owain Knight (talk) 13:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
                • Owain Knight: This is telling. The simple fact that you didn't review this in its original resolution invalidate your vote. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Wendell Phillips by Brady.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 22:57:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wendell Phillips, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing left
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mathew Brady, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann (talk) 22:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support At least 150 years old... -- Yann (talk) 22:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK tu pars de loin, mais tu peux faire plus...😉--Jebulon (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Jebulon C'est à dire ? Yann (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
      • @Yann: Il y a encore des tachouilles que tu peux nettoyer, non ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
        • Il faut savoir s'arrêter. Je me suis demandé jusqu'où fallait-il retoucher le cadre. Passé ce point le mieux serait de supprimer tout l'extérieur... Yann (talk) 09:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
          • C'est dedans qu'il y a des choses à améliorer, je trouve.--Jebulon (talk) 14:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 09:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nice job restoring it! Excellent historical person to remember. --Caballero//Historiador 12:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Reflexos do Planalto.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 14:14:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Jonas Richter - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very interesting architecture and a nice mood. Could you please add an English description? --Code (talk) 19:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak support because small and DoF can be better but nice compotions and colours --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very nice photo. I would have loved for the top of that building not to have been cut off, but I wasn't the one taking the photo. By the way, it's easy enough for me to understand that this building is the seat of the Brazilian Federal Executive. It's the second sentence that's not as easy for me to make out without running some words through a translator or dictionary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Information for @Code, Ikan Kekek: English description and category added. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
      • Thanks, but you translated the part whose meaning was evident to me. :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
        • Ikan Kekek the second part it's just a dramatic text about the photo (it was difficult to translate with the same intensity): "Photo clicked at dusk in September day, during the highest point of the dry season, the setting sun provides special colours to the monument." Nothing important, this kind of dramatic description is quite normal in photo contests promote by this Brazilian "group", the lack of orientation create this type of description. This is a "good" one, normally are "Think about some x, reflecting in the power of my photo...". -- RTA 09:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Special architecture. Great colors. Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm not sure. Nice composition. The resolution is low for this kind of image, DoF small. IMO it's sharp in the front and not sharp enough in the back. f/6.3 is too small for this kind of image. --XRay talk 05:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose something is missing, have a lack of wow here. The build size is compromised by the composition, as this is just a small portion of the building, giving the impression of away smaller building, the water is a little bit distracting a longer exposure would be better, and the most impressive of this portion of the building is the curves that are not highlighted in this photo, it's too far, and a little bit lost in the trees. -- RTA 09:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral like XRay. Very good composition, but quite small for a static subject. Quality is OK, but the sky is not interesting. Yann (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Moderate support It could be better, but because of the limitations of the camera used and my own partiality to images of modernist buildings reflected in water I will let that go. I also completed the English description and added the golden-hour category it supports (not that it wasn't obvious from the image, anyway). Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I feel something like RTA. The compo does not work for me (the foor structure at left), and the whole is too yellow. Not a FP for me.--Jebulon (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. No reason for FP. --Karelj (talk) 21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per XRay. --Laitche (talk) 15:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Gesù e Maria (Rome) - Intern.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 10:54:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gesù e Maria (Rome) - Intern
  • These are the colours,nothing is "over". Anyway thanks for opinion --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Moderated support Nice colors, but overexposed windows. Anyway, beautiful interior and FP for me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:56, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm inclined to Symbol support vote.svg Support, but with the same caveat Arion gave above. I wonder how a picture with a slightly shorter exposure would look, because it's not just the windows themselves but some surrounding areas that are overexposed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral but, what stuff are the craftsmen smoking? --Hubertl 23:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC) I changed to neutral, because I smoked some good stuff yesterday ;-), now I´m sober. It´s oversaturated IMO. Maybe you can change it, the rest doesn´t bother me so much. --Hubertl 21:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Long the exposure may have been, but the ringing around the lights and statues on the sides doesn't have to be there. Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I agree with opposers. + oversharpening white lines.--Jebulon (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overprocessed, not natural colors. --Karelj (talk) 09:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Bad Kleinkirchheim St Oswald Kirchweg 16 Pfarrkirche hl Oswald Tuerbeschlag 17092015 7572.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 08:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Handles and hinges of the iron door at the Roman Catholic parish church Saint Oswald on Kirchweg #16 in Saint Oswald, municipality Bad Kleinkirchheim, Carinthia, Austria

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5587.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 07:32:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shelf with hymnals in the St. Jacob's Church, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Thanks for your information. I'll fix it within the next days. --XRay talk 21:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ Fixed It's fixed now. --XRay talk 17:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Far much better, thanks. I like this kind of pictures very much ("different"), especially because I imagine you when you decided to shot this...--Jebulon (talk) 10:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose What is the value of this picture? Nothing particularly interesting. - Owain Knight (talk) 18:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. No reason for FP. --Karelj (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A photo designed to annoy the OC(P)D in me and others! -- KTC (talk) 01:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Vineyards in Prades-sur-Vernazobre 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2016 at 21:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Landscape and vineyards in Prades-sur-Vernazobre, France
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nicely composed, beautiful landscape. France is beautiful.--Jebulon (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Jebulon. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 23:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Jebulon. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--LivioAndronico (talk) 11:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 14:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Under cloudy sky, reveals some features that might not have been visible in sunlight. Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 21:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but for me this has no "wow." The composition is rather dull, and while grey skies are good for bringing out delicate textures or vibrant colors that would be lost under harsh sunlight, here I don't think it works. --King of ♠ 01:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This light is very boring, this grass in foreground don't add to the photo, also the sky, the sky is very dull, and occupy more than 35% of the photo...-- RTA 09:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I keep searching for something outstanding in this motif. --Milseburg (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, I don't see something of "wow". Simply and uninteresting landscape with dull light for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Christian, where is your great sensitivity of composition. --Laitche (talk) 15:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Colors, details, weather are ok IMO but apparently lack of movement in the image to generate enthousiasm...Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Madrid May 2014-8a.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2016 at 16:02:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of the main chapel, Basílica de San Francisco el Grande
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Basílica de San Francisco el Grande. Madrid. Ceiling of the main chapel. It was painted in the last decade of the 19th centurt by José Marcelo Contreras. This is one of a series of photos I took of the ceiling of the Basílica. Without a top quality camera it wouldn't have been possible to use such high ISO settings and still obtain this much detail. Failed first nomination is here. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support We've been spoiled by church interiors that are pinpoint clear throughout, and this is clear on the ceiling but not as clear on the walls. However, it's good enough for me. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 19:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as others. --Hubertl 10:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Equus zebra hartmannae - Etosha 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2016 at 08:31:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Equus zebra hartmannae - Etosha

File:Kõnnu Suursoo. 10.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2016 at 04:07:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden hour in Kõnnu Suursoo bog
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Aleksandr Abrosimov - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 04:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 04:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - This is another one that's grown on me. At first, I doubted I'd vote to support this photo, and if you zoom to full size, it looks like the details are blurred by the golden sun. But look at it at full-page size and move your eyes around it, and you may find that it's a great picture. One question, though: Is the sun rising or setting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
It is taken after sunrise (based on image data: July 16th, 5:02 AM). Sun rises around 04:33 at that day there. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Maria Carolina of Austria in the Palace of Caserta.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 21:10:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Maria Carolina of Austria in the Palace of Caserta
  • Livio this is not a question of taste, you didn't use the full spectrum of colours, and have a lack of whites and blacks.-- RTA
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 14:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely colors. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 17:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 21:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Why Abstain Livioandronico? --Famberhorst (talk) 07:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 12:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

For me, and for the histogram it's dark, and lack of whites and blacks. Ans was to blue to me, so:

Maria Carolina of Austria in the Palace of Caserta edited.jpg

  • -- RTA 09:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment for @Rodrigo.Argenton: OK, but I prefer to overwriting. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)--
    • Arion, this is not my paper, as you can see [1], the author have his own mind, and always have this posture (and in my opinion he thinks I take things in a personal matters as others), so I will not change his version. -- RTA 10:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
      • Anyway, I Symbol support vote.svg Support too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The white balance might be better (not sure), but this looks overexposed. Yann (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
    • See Livio the difference? This is only a opinion based in believe (and probably in dirt political matter), not in fact, the fact is that it's not overexposed, and you just need a software that generate histogram to know it: see. -- RTA 18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - Which one of these versions looks more similar to the real-life appearance of this ceiling? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9185.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 20:07:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jesuit church, Vienna
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info ceiling work at the choir, Jesuit Church, Vienna.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Hubertl 20:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hubertl 20:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'm bugged by the crop that shows just a bit of golden color. I'll Symbol support vote.svg Support, anyway, though, because it is a really good photo and composition. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great light and colors. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Is the high altar skewed in reality? --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hm, I don´t know really, I should go there again and have a look. --Hubertl 15:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I straightened the lines partly, Uoaei1 Thanks for the hint. --Hubertl 20:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Faustulus - Mosaic de Font de Mussa - Museu de Prehistòria de València.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 18:05:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail of Faustulus as seen in the Font de Mussa Mosaic exhibited in the Prehistory Museum of Valencia. Is one of the few existant artworks portraying Faustulus dating from the Ancient age.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
It was released by the Museum, a ORTS ticket is on the way.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not only per Jebulon's concerns, but this doesn't seem like the best possible picture of this mosaic. I haven't seen it so I don't know if this the whole thing, although I suspect it isn't. If it isn't, then these odd crops were avoidable. Add that to the barely-eligible size of the image, and what you have is a well-done tourist snaphot, but no better (A QI maybe). Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Kippelboy (talk) 06:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Catalan support ? 😊--Jebulon (talk) 20:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • It's a file obtained under a GLAM Amical campaign, yes.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 11:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Shirley Chisholm.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 14:28:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shirley Chisholm
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Thomas J. O'Halloran - lightly restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 18:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - It's good to see a picture of Shirley Chisholm again, one of my parents' favorite politicians. Good picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Ikan. Iconic picture of iconic woman with iconic hairstyle (Face-wink.svg). And just in time for Black History Month in the U.S. Daniel Case (talk) 23:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 17:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Owain Knight (talk) 18:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Owain Knight: Could you please explain why you oppose? Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Because of people like this, civilization is threatened with collapse. I don't think this is "the finest thing" that should be featured. - Owain Knight (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Opposing a feature because you oppose someone's politics? Disgraceful! Your politics don't determine whether someone is historically important. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)