Commons:Кандидате пентру имаджини ексчеленте

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Дакэ консидери кэ ексистэ о фотографйе пе Коммонс суфичиент де атрактивэ ка сэ се афле пе паджина Commons:Имаджини ексчеленте, атунчи те ругэм инклуде-о ын листа де кандидате едитынд ачеастэ паджинэ. Дакэ ексистэ ун консенс дженерал дупэ 15 зиле, имаджинеа ва фи трансфератэ ла Commons:Имаджини ексчеленте.

Contents

Пропунери[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Flute with musicial notes.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 May 2016 at 16:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flute with musicial notes

File:Castell i pirotècnic (26627823346).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 May 2016 at 10:40:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Per high illustrative merit. Image made by "Andrés Marín Jarque", from the Valencian Museum of Ethnology. Is an image from the collection of the museum, so it was designed with education purpose. It illustrates a Valencian artisan of Fireworks (which are very popular in the Land of Valencia, with tradition) and also a Firework as could have been made in a Valencian rural town in the 50's or the 70's. I believe it deserves to be considered a Featured Image because it shows How Fireworks are, how they are made, and how they were made in a particular age (mid-XX century) and in a particular place (Valencia).
  • Category: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the category here>]]
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by USERNAME - uploaded by USERNAME - nominated by TaronjaSatsuma -- TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 10:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per high illustrative merit. Image made by "Andrés Marín Jarque", from the Valencian Museum of Ethnology. Is an image from the collection of the museum, so it was designed with educational purpose. It illustrates a Valencian artisan of Fireworks (which are very popular in the Land of Valencia, with tradition) and also a Firework as could have been shoot in a Valencian rural town in the 50's or the 70's. I believe it deserves to be considered a Featured Image because it shows how Fireworks are, how they are made, and how they were made in a particular age (mid-XX century) and in a particular place (Valencia). Artistic and also Ethnological interest in different ways. -- TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 10:40, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2015 Wege zur Kunst Morgenrot.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 May 2016 at 08:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Artwork "Behold the dawn in the east"
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Kreuzschnabel 08:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Sculpture "Behold the dawn in the east" by Eckhart Dietz, steel cast 2002, Wege zur Kunst, Straßdorf, Germany. I have taken several images of it but this one, taken in the early morning light, is by far the best, fitting the artwork’s caption perfectly while still showing its location and surrounding.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kreuzschnabel 08:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Doesn't wow me per se, but I like it. I think the haze and noise in the sky and background are OK; that's the kind of morning it was, I figure. I agree that it's a good picture of the sculpture, and its unusual background of corn fields. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:PraiaForteSaoMateo-ene2016-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 May 2016 at 22:41:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View on a Forte Sao Mateo beach
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me Ezarateesteban 22:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Decent quality picture with some noise, but the composition isn't special to me and the crops, especially on the right side, feel random. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan Kekek – nothing extraordinary here, just a nice beach being spoilt by mass tourism. White areas blown (contrast overdone), noticeable chromatic aberration on the foreground sand patterns, and the lower 60 % of the frame show nothing of any interest to me. Hardly QI, not featurable. --Kreuzschnabel 07:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose like Kreuzschnabel --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2013.07.16.-1-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim-Vierfleck-Maennchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 May 2016 at 16:57:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Four-spotted chaser - Libellula quadrimaculata, male.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family:Libellulidae (Skimmers)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 16:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hockei (talk) 16:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry the lower part of the animal isn't in focus Ezarateesteban 22:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Impossible on a macro shot like this to get such a depth of object all in focus unless by focus stacking, which can only be done on an object that won’t move. --Kreuzschnabel 07:15, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very nice setting but severely oversharpened, showing sharpening artifacts on all edges. Re-edit possible? --Kreuzschnabel 07:15, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Opened few times, i miss some left part of background. Cant see sharp artefacts. Was this tripod or leaning...f/8 perhaps for more DOF, quality would be same. --Mile (talk) 07:36, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Red flower, Berlin, Germany, in the evening, 2015-07-10.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 May 2016 at 13:20:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red flower in the garden
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by SDKmac - uploaded by SDKmac - nominated by SDKmac -- SDKmac (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the colours are quite good and there's a contrast. Let me hear what you think about it -- SDKmac (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose colours and contrast is fine - in a way - but in fact, its oversaturated. For becoming featured, it needs much more: Exceptional sharpness in the focused areas, lack of color noise, some more DOF, no chromatic aberrations and last but not least: no jpg artifacts. Please have a look at this gallery to compare. And at the very end, every flower has to be categorized correctly with a sufficient description. Red flower in Berlin is not a description for a featured picture at all. Its not sufficient enough to get this picture promoted as a quality image. I´m sorry, but you will do it better next time. Try first with the quality image process. --Hubertl 13:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Hubertl: Ok. Thank you. It's possible to de-nominate it? I'll do it better next time. --SDKmac (talk) 14:07, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment just use the {{Withdrawn}}-Tag, so the nomination will be removed. But you can also wait for some other opinions. I´m not the master photographer here! --Hubertl 14:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • @SDKmac i recommend tripod and maybe stacking method for flowers. --Mile (talk) 16:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Hubertl, furthermore too much noise on bakckground --Ezarateesteban 22:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - To my eyes, it looks like nothing at all is in focus at full size. By the way, Hubertl, you're way more modest than you need to be. You are a master photographer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:St. Sebastian, Berlin-Wedding, 160429, ako.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 May 2016 at 04:37:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Sebastian, Berlin-Wedding (nave)

File:Ilya Repin - Sadko - Google Art Project levels adjustment 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 May 2016 at 03:33:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ilya Repin - "Sadko"

File:Pierre Gaveaux by Edmé Quenedey (1821).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 May 2016 at 00:11:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pierre Gaveaux

File:Ara bleu (Planète Sauvage, Pornic).JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2016 at 21:21:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Tempodrom, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 01-03 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2016 at 21:07:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the event venue Tempodrom during the blue hour, Kreuzberg neighborhood, Berlin, Germany.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the event venue Tempodrom during the blue hour, Kreuzberg neighborhood, Berlin, Germany. It was inaugurated in 1980 next to the Berlin Wall on the west side of Potsdamer Platz and housed in a large circus tent. After several changes of location it got a permanent building in 2002 and has today three performance spaces with a capacity of 3,800 people in the main one. All by me, Poco2 21:07, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 21:07, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 21:32, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Looks inclined (CCW) to the horizontal line. --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - That's quite nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment According to the verticals in the background another perspective correction seems to be necessary - see note --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Need some rotation, left side is some smudged, i would erase those two stars. --Mile (talk) 07:45, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the blue hour mood (albeit I had seen pictures which benefit significantly more from it), however, the combination of the very tight lower crop and very generous upper crop is something I don't like here at all. The barrel-like construction in the middle is not very appealing either (even though it's not the photographer's fault), and Wladyslaw is also right about the tilt. All in all: no; sorry. --A.Savin 14:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have uploaded a ✓ new version with some perspective adjustments Poco2 20:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 03:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 04:37, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:The freshwater alga Spirogyra.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2016 at 18:58:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The freshwater alga Spirogyra with visible chloroplasts
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Other lifeforms
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Wiedehopf20 - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love this kind of pics --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Me too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support At f/0, the depth of field is way too shallow. Clin -- Ram-Man 21:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
    And a focal length of 0mm too! --King of ♠ 03:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 01:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:39, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 17:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 03:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - I love seeing photos of spirogyra and other microscopic organisms, but it's possible to take photos of them in which their positions on the screen happen to form nicer compositions than this. I certainly won't be a killjoy and try to stop a feature, but this is not my absolute favorite microscope picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zcebeci (talk) 09:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Tubifera dudkae-4.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2016 at 18:58:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Internal surface of the peridium of the rare myxomycete Tubifera dudkae
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Дмитро Леонтьєв - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It don't have a excellent quality, however, it's a magnification x2000. Amazing --The Photographer (talk) 22:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per the photographer, I mean, The Photographer. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:14, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mile (talk) 07:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:45, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I would support featuring this picture if it is subjected to a fairly tight crop around the yellow/tan area that's most nearly in focus. The photo will still be instructive (it should show enough of the blue area), but without the top, bottom and left sides, which are drastically out of focus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zcebeci (talk) 09:14, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Jong blad van rode beuk Fagus sylvatica 'Purpurea'. Locatie, De Famberhorst 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2016 at 16:24:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Young leaf of red beech Fagus sylvatica 'Purpurea'. De Famberhorst in the Netherlands.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants Fagus sylvatica 'Purpurea'#Family Fagaceae. -->
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Famberhorst. Nominated by Ram-Man -- -- Ram-Man 16:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support If this were mine, I would nominate it. So here it is. I love the colors and composition. -- -- Ram-Man 16:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I was thinking of that nomination when I promotted it as QI... The background ("bockeh") is very good too.--Jebulon (talk) 19:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 21:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - What I like best about this photo is the visible detail at full magnification. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Which lense do you use, Famberhorst? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Answer: The picture was taken with a Canon EF-S 60mm f / 2.8 Macro USM lens. This lens fits through an adapter on our Canon camera system. The lens has a fixed focal length of 60mm. After some practice to gain experience with the lens it meets us fine.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 17:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 04:20, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zcebeci (talk) 09:15, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Teresa Carreño at the piano.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2016 at 14:35:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Teresa Carreño
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by uncredited photographer - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info While one could argue for crops, I think the existence of things like en:Template:CSS image crop means that we're generally better off promoting an uncropped version, except where the uncropped version has serious compositional flaws, to maximise how it can be reused. For example, if one wanted to use an image as part of a book cover, the space above and below would become important to give space for title and author; and likewise, if it had to fit into a specific aspect ratio, there's only a chance to be able to do this if there's room to crop. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Some interesting damage in the original. Besides the really obvious parts - the two white streaks on the music, and to the right of Carreño respectively, the text drawn over the image at the top, and the chunks out of the bottom, there were large-ish white spots all over the place if you zoom in, several thinner black scratches, and some fading at the left and right edges, and the standard damage for old photos (small spots and scratches). I believe I've dealt with it all (So long as one agrees with me that the remaining scratches on the piano appear to have been there in real life). One part of the top of the mirror in the back is reconstructed; I'm open to criticism there. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks for fulfill my request. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 18:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Fine restoration job. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support excellent restoration --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:CRS-6 first stage booster landing attempt.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2016 at 12:00:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Falcon 9 first stage approaches ASDS Just Read the Instructions in the Atlantic Ocean after successfully launching SpaceX CRS-6 to the International Space Station, April 14, 2015.

File:Dragon 2 hover test (24159153709).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2016 at 12:01:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Propulsive hover tests of DragonFly test vehicle.

File:Wakefield Cathedral Nave 2, West Yorkshire, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2016 at 09:45:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wakefield Cathedral
Diliff Thanks god!, I know that you have a real life, however, let me know that you are here with us. A hug. --The Photographer (talk) 22:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
I like David too but let this man having his family life :) --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:26, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Oedlerteich -- 2016 -- 1932.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2016 at 08:42:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Prachtig uitrollend jong blad van mannetjesvaren (Dryopteris filix-mas). Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 May 2016 at 05:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dryopteris filix-mas #Family Dryopteridaceae

File:ЕкспедицијаЛакавичко 26.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 22:36:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mantovo Lake in Macedonia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Petrovskyz - uploaded by Petrovskyz - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Gorgeous scene overall, but the bottom crop is distracting (middle rock cut off, random rocks appearing on the left). There are also quality issues, like an unsharp background (avoidable since it was shot at f/4.5) and some mild CA on the branches. --King of ♠ 01:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support - I do think the degree of unsharpness of the background is sub-optimal, but it was a hazy day, so it's kind of understandable and looks good at full-page size. The "random rocks" are interesting to look at, for me. Mainly, I just enjoy looking at this photo. I'm not sure how close it is to being one of the best photos on the site, though, so I'm just a hair past neutral. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

File:ЕкспедицијаЛакавичко 77.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 22:22:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Elijah Church in the village Lubnica, Macedonia

File:2016 FED 5C 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 19:15:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

FED 5C camera

File:Düsseldorf - Gehrybauten4.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 19:01:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Düssledorf: Neuer Zollhof

File:Willis Building Reflections.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 18:42:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Willis Building Reflections
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Lloyd's building is reflected in the curved face of the Willis Building in the City of London. All by me. -- Colin (talk) 18:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 18:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a minimal crop left and right can make it maybe a bit less unrhythmic. The pole left, the white area right. --Hubertl 19:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Hubertl, I uploaded a crop. I'm torn between showing the very edge of the glass on the right, and cropping as you suggest to keep the illusion of endless repetition. -- Colin (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
      • You did exactly what I meant. In my opinion it was a bit disturbing. Now its far better. Even when it was just a small change. --Hubertl 21:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like this a lot. It's a very rich experience to move my eyes around this picture frame. Cropping a to the right of the pole would create a fine photo, but it would be a different photo. This one, with one bright, active rhythm from the right and a shadier, more restful one from the left is already quite rhythmic and frankly, I consider it better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure what "pole" Hubertl refers to. The very slight crop I made removes a bright strip on the bottom left and a beige strip along the right which was the edge of the glass. -- Colin (talk) 19:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 01:16, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 01:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 19:43, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zcebeci (talk) 09:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Во шумата на Баба 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 17:32:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Darkocv - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like this photo for really capturing the atmosphere of this kind of forest, with its tall trees whose scale is shown by the presence of the man, the space between them that the viewer can read and feel, the light and the mist. Since the photo captures all of that, I don't mind that it's not fully sharp at full size. However, I'd like to see how the photo would look with perspective correction. I have a slight suspicion that it gives the viewer more of a sense of being enveloped by the forest this way, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Great atmosphere; I think the unsharpness is excusable given the low light conditions. --King of ♠ 01:36, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice atmosphere and composition, but unfortunately the quality is not convincing. Lots of CA at the top and overall very noisy and unsharp. --Code (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Rooster in Kathmandu, Nepal.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 16:12:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rooster in Kathmandu, Nepal

File:Panorama of Paris at sunset, 10 June 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 16:08:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paris view from above from the Montparnasse Tower at sunset.

File:Glasgow City Chambers - Banqueting Hall - 6.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 15:20:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Glasgow City Chambers, UK
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Colin - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support dynamic image with this bird's perspective -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Being taken halfway up a tall room means this image doesn't suffer from the vertical-perspective issues that affect many grand interior photos. High ISO since it was taken on a tour with no tripod permitted. Christian, ArionEstar, I've uploaded a new version with some midtone colour correction to avoid a green tinge -- you may need to use Ctrl-F5 or similar to reload the image. -- Colin (talk) 16:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for a out-of-the-hand-shot a very good work! --Hubertl 17:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - I'm not finding the composition really compelling. I understand that the advantage to this view over the straight view is that this photo is not dominated by a large electrolier in the foreground, but this view accentuates the crops to me and the way they bisect a table and also the curvature of the ceiling on the left side. It's certainly a good picture, but I'll let others decide whether it should be featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 01:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good Lord, what is FP here. My eyes feel straight to lights, chroma noise is huge, HDR should be made like i did down. Composition is awkward here, doesnt work. 9,5 MPx shot from 24 MPx camera, what would be colors seen in normal resolution ? --Mile (talk) 07:42, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Mile, I agree this is noisy (though luminance, not chroma noise, is the issue here) at ISO 1250, and I'm not so aggressive with NR as some others. My photo of the electrolier handled the bright lights by under-exposing the image and then recovering. Here the photo is of the whole room, and the lights are less significant -- bare light bulbs should be white and glow, so I think the effect here is realistic for what the eye sees. I would love to take a stitched HDR photo of this room, and perhaps that could be arranged some day with special permission -- but tripod photography wasn't allowed on the tour of the building I was on. Ultimately, though, you should judge the image, not the situation or camera, so I wouldn't expect this to get an easy ride at FPC. -- Colin (talk) 08:36, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my photo. With respect to Christian and the other support votes, I think I have persuaded myself to agree with Mile -- this is not among our interior finest images. I think my own natural bias towards my own image, and the difficulty of taking a good shot in the circumstances, encouraged me to think that this was good enough. It isn't. -- Colin (talk) 08:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Colin it is Christian nominee, can that be done i dont know. I had one case of nominating my photo by other, maybe strange since not all are OK, I rather see what to bring here. For noise and tripod, if this would be some huge story behind it, Titanic pub or Unesco site, i would agree. Look at my ISO 1600, UNESCO site, 1/6s from last year. They didnt care much. --Mile (talk) 12:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Colin have the right to withdraw, I respect that and it is in the rules, no problem. Though we upload our images in the purpose that they are free to be reused, it should start with a free use of the images in our local projects and by the respect of its potential uses by others, e.g. a nomination here. It is a kind of paradox, but I think it's a good thing for several reasons that the author have the right and the possibility to withdraw. I myself had withdrawn a lot of my nominations with already enough votes to be promoted, but I never withdraw a nomination made by someone else. I would tend rather to oppose or to remain neutral but in all cases to respect the choice of the nominator. That's said to have a high quality demands on these own works is a proof of selflessness and is quite respectable, this is how I take this withdraw and I respect that. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:49, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Christian Ferrer you are right, its is paradox. For that 10-15 people i see here mostly, i think man can put his own nominee up. What i want more, to make this anonymus for time of voting. Now many are afraid to vote minus, keeping low profile, protecting own photo...this isnt good. I did promote 1-2 images of other people, which arent seen here, thats OK. Something will have to be done here, till better times. --Mile (talk) 07:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In case this isn't withdrawn, I do agree with the explanation for withdrawing and opposing. -- Ram-Man 16:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Ceiling of Santa Maria ai Monti (Rome).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 14:14:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of Santa Maria ai Monti (Rome)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 15:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very pretty; good work. Please include the name of the painter in your file description (and probably also in your categories). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:11, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Vineyard - Tiagua.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 06:37:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vineyard cultivation near Tiagua, Municipio de Teguise, Lanzarote, Canary Islands, Spain.

File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 7965-9.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 06:05:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature reserve “Westruper Heide” at the beginning of flowering of the heath, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for your hint. I've to define the area to be highlighted if it's a local adjustment. What do you should be improved? The sky? The sun? I'll try to check the improvement. --XRay talk 17:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
@XRay: Sorry for my wrong and bad english langage, I didn't want to say "local", I mean tone curve highlights for the whole photo, +30 from current setting. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, Christian. Yes, it's better. I've just uploaded the improved image. --XRay talk 19:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
@XRay: ok thank you, now it will be perfect if you could decrease just a bit the saturation because images always look more satured after such a change, look at the trees on the right of the image... Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
I'll look for saturation tomorrow. Thanks. --XRay talk 19:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Yes. Thanks. A little less saturation. --XRay talk 15:10, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Haltern am See, Westruper Heide -- 2015 -- 8306-10.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 May 2016 at 06:03:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature reserve “Westruper Heide” at the flowering of the heath, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Navio negreiro - Rugendas 1830.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 May 2016 at 20:38:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

'Negros in the cellar of a slave boat, by Johann Moritz Rugendas
This picture is from Itaú Cultura Museum, Paulista Avenue, São Paulo. Thanks for your nomination and question --The Photographer (talk) 22:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
@The Photographer: So why Category:Prints in the Biblioteca Nacional do Brasil? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
It was a copy and paste from description of another version --The Photographer (talk) 23:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ~pikolas [[mia diskuto]] 16:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 01:32, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think it might be inappropriately cropped, but I checked the alts, and one shows a bit of black on one edge, so I'll give it a pass for now. I don't like seeing engravings without the text and borders , but they very rarely do go to the edge Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kruusamägi (talk) 21:10, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another excellent digitization of a work of art from Brazil. However, I would like to see it clearly described and categorized as an engraving, rather than a painting, because someone presuming this to be a digitization of a painting might consider it to be subpar. Daniel Case (talk) 17:37, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:ЕкспедицијаЛакавичко 190.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 May 2016 at 20:12:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Photograph from the Holy Trinity Church in Radovish, Macedonia.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Shot on overcast weather, however it wasn't completely gray which gives the texture in the clouds behind and somehow amps up the saturation in the colors. Sadly I couldn't move the gate to form a perfectly symmetrical look, but I think it isn't such a big problem here. It is one image, shot handheld. The soft light kind of hurt the details, but it isn't that bad, at least better than I anticipated it to be. Created by Petrovskyz - uploaded by Petrovskyz - nominated by Ehrlich91 -- Ehrlich91 (talk) 20:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ehrlich91 (talk) 20:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The gate doesn't bother me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Please don´t mix up Creator/Uploader and Nominator! --Hubertl 20:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Interesting view and nice composition, but the detail is not there at all. Camera and lens seem good, so it looks like the building was out of focus and then oversharpened. --DXR (talk) 08:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per DXR. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose air hallos --Mile (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per DXR --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Beautiful light and composition but insufficient technical quality. Try again using a tripod and manual focusing. --Kreuzschnabel 14:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Would that it were sharper, per everyone else ... Daniel Case (talk) 17:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:MUSE interior.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 May 2016 at 17:38:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of MUSE - Science Museum in Trento.

File:Rococo staircase (Gruber Mansion, Slovenia).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 May 2016 at 09:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rococo staircase (Gruber Mansion, Slovenia)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Rococo staircase in Gruber Mansion, Ljubljana. About photo: behind window is white wall, not burned. Fresco above cant be seen like this in real, HDR make it looking better than in real. Shot with fisheye.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 09:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 09:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Much as I love my fisheye, I don't think this scene benefits and the curved wall is troublesome. Also the crop just looks like "this is as much as I could fit" rather than a careful arrangement -- the left side is chopped off. And although a small part of the ceiling fresco is now visible, it remains very poor quality. I recommend trying a panorama + HDR like Diliff used here to get the wide staircase but with regular verticals. Also the ceiling fresco appears to be a dome so may be better shot from below, looking up. A landscape-orientation would achieve the width with a standard lens like this photo. -- Colin (talk) 11:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I take it, the curvature in the walls is not real, and in that case, I'm not willing to consider supporting this photo unless the description specifically mentions that the curvature is inaccurate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
    • @Ikan Kekek: Fisheye is used, written in description and Categorized. Real - what is real Ikan, you support down picture of huge PD correction, where chair become bench, circular pillar become ecliptycal, is that real ? You saw Jebulon comment there, he is right also. Diliff is using most PD corrected images, but thats the need to show it. @Colin i use correct lens in my situation, my space was much smaller and much more closed than other stairs you show. Camerman there had other kind of capturing, biger distance, more above, he collected one more upper stairs. My stairs are more centralized and better for fisheye, which was also used in first case of other camerman i show. Your option here is withot stairs, done by one who didnt had it, in that case good also, but main stuff was to get nice looking stairs. I did fine, red stairs with white back. Rectangle is a no-go here. --Mile (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Thanks for your response, Mile. But just so we're understanding each other, this is what I see in the file description: "Rococo staicase in Gruber Mansion (Ljubljana, Slovenia)." That's it. It's also mentioned that it's an HDR shot, but I don't see Fisheye in the description. I just think the viewer should have a clear, brief explanation of the technique you used. One you add one in the file description, I will consider the photo. I consider photos individually, and there are different types and degrees of distortion that have different affects on me as a viewer. In this case, the curvature of the walls has a bit of a funhouse aspect to it, so I find an explanation more necessary than in some other situations. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
      • I don't think you can claim a fisheye was necessary or correct, and how do you know Diliff's other staircase wasn't equally wide-angle. A fisheye is convenient for capturing, in one frame, an image that would require stitching with other lenses, but also introduces distortions that other techniques can avoid. You are right that a corrected ultra-wide can have unpleasant stretching, but then one must balance that with curved lines that may be a more disruptive distortion. I try to restrict my fisheye for images that are already curvy, or I can defish them with Lightroom or Photoshop. Have you tried defishing this? With lightroom, one merely applies the lens profile for the lens (or a similar one if yours isn't available). I think Poco has more experience using Photoshop. -- Colin (talk) 18:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin, I don't agree with its use here. --King of ♠ 01:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik (edits) 08:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Colin and KoH. Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:AT 50473 Justizpalast Wien, Iustitia - Emanuel Pendl 4388-HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 May 2016 at 07:26:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View from the second floor to the westside of the assembly hall with part of the stairway and arcades. Palace of Justice, Vienna. Architect: Alexander Wielemans von Monteforte (erected 1879). Iustitia, this sitting marble figure is almost 2.5 m high and was made by Emanuel Pendl in 1881. All by -- Hubertl 07:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hubertl 07:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support well done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. I like the symmetry. --XRay talk 10:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As always. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Everything perfect. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support And 7 ...--LivioAndronico (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kasir (talk) 09:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but crop is a bit tight on top --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Ponte dos Ingleses, também conhecida como Ponte Metálica.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 May 2016 at 21:12:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Claudney Neves - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Image quality is not the best, but for a 16 MP resolution I'll allow some room for error. Great colors and composition. --King of ♠ 23:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 08:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak IQ could be much better but per King --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice image. Sharpness could be better. Lens flare should be removed. --XRay talk 10:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak support For King --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - This is a very pretty picture, but considering that we're considering whether it's one of the very best on the site, I think it falls a bit short in that I don't find the composition super-compelling and the sky is noisy. I don't love this blurry a background in a seascape, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great mood and composition. But even recognizing that it's a long exposure, it still could be sharper. And the motion blur on the ship kind of ruins the effect for me. Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Mina de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 110-112 PAN.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 May 2016 at 19:42:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chuquicamata is a state-owned copper mine located at 9,350 feet (2,850m) above sea level just outside Calama, north of Chile.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Industry
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panoramic view of Chuquicamata, a state-owned copper mine located at 2,850 metres (9,350 ft) above sea level just outside Calama, north of Chile. It is by excavated volume the largest open pit copper mine in the world. The huge hole was started in 1882 as a mine to extract gold and copper. It is 3.5 kilometres (2.2 mi) long, 4.5 kilometres (2.8 mi) wide and with a depth of 850 metres (2,790 ft) it is the second deepest open-pit mine in the world (after Bingham Canyon Mine in Utah, USA). Note: to get a feeling of the scale spot out a haul truck, which is 9.5 metres (31 ft) long and 4.5 metres (15 ft) high. All by me, Poco2 19:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 19:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 19:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 08:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 10:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Impressive. --Pugilist (talk) 13:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support My dog likes to dig holes too but he never got that far. --Kreuzschnabel 14:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is certainly an impressive hole and this image contains as much of it as this viewpoint allows. But I don't think it is that great a photograph. The wide panorama suffers from the usual problem of a bow of waste material at the bottom, and a lack of anywhere to focus on. A number of man-made structures indicate that the verticals aren't all right in this stitch. The lighting / time-of-day also doesn't add anything special. I much prefer File:Mina de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 121.JPG. For me, even though that other photo doesn't even get to the top of the hole, the scale is very impressive and perhaps endless. The clarity at 100% is much better, allowing one to see more details of the vehicles and the rock faces. I find it is a much better composition and superior technical quality, and consider that one to be your FP and this the VI. -- Colin (talk) 14:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Colin's point. However, I would have voted for this picture if it didn't cut off the left side of the mine. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Ikan and Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zcebeci (talk) 09:19, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:St. Pölten Dom Hochaltar 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 May 2016 at 15:29:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

High altar of St. Pölten Cathedral, Lower Austria

File:Laon Porte d'Ardon 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 May 2016 at 15:26:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Porte d'Ardon in Laon, Picardie, France

File:Winchester Cathedral Nave 1, Hampshire, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 May 2016 at 10:46:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winchester Cathedral

File:Rhapsody (ship, 1996), Sète cf01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 May 2016 at 05:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rhapsody (ship, 1996)
I was surprised by the size of the boat, I came with the prime 35mm lens, I applied a small perspective correction and this is the bigger size I can give. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support You might try simple panorama, handheld, two shot then stitch. Just lock settings to be same. --Mile (talk) 12:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)re
Yes indeed, I have not had the idea to do this... Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support crystal clear picture of a piece of ugliness! This ship is a candidate for the hall of shame. But maybe just in my humble opinion. --Hubertl 12:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I must say that the bright effect here comes from the use of a UV filter, this one, this is also why I had chosen the 35mm lens despite the size of the ship, as my 14-24mm accepts no filter. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It’s impressively sharp and rich in detail, yet the tight side crop does not appeal to me. So, it’s just a ship, no idea beyond the plain rendering (if only I could see the wide sea it’s going for! Oh, and I agree with Hubertl about its lack of beauty). Some pixelisation on the right side (look at the letters of the name), maybe due to your perspective correction. I rather tend to oppose in spite of the technical qualities and high resolution.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Outstanding capture of an ordinary subject. The dominance of the white and blue throughout the image makes for a strong motif. --King of ♠ 23:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good image. (Crop could be better left and right.) --XRay talk 10:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ideally, one would have liked to see some way of compensating for the necessarily short exposure that left the clouds a little darker than they would naturally be. But ... that's a quibble, and this picture easily clears the bar. Daniel Case (talk) 23:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

File:Imperial Academy of Arts Panorama.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 May 2016 at 00:15:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Petersburg, Russia: building of the Imperial Academy of Arts
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Russia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Florstein - nominated by A.Savin --A.Savin 00:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 00:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 00:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another standard Florstein, but the colors in this picture are especially nice. --King of ♠ 01:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Certainly a nice building, but I don't love what's on either side of it. I think that for me to consider this kind of shot a FP, it would need more sky, with nice clouds (especially, dramatic ones), or perhaps some really great light, such as the streaming yellow sunlight that you can get shortly after sunrise. Sorry, I know this may seem a bit nitpicky. It's a very good photo, but it's not quite FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a nice capture with good detail though I agree with Ikan that it would benefit from more sky. But it is way over-processed. Compare File:Imperial Academy of Arts.jpg. The white in the other photo is peach yellow/orange in this. While such a change could occur with "golden hour" lighting, this photo was taken at 13:16, 17 October 2015, which is far away from golden hour as one can get. And golden light wouldn't explain why all the grey elements (street signs, cars) are blue-grey. It's too contrasty too. I'd support a neutral version where Photoshop Lightroom sliders were more conservatively set. -- Colin (talk) 07:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Enough to be a FP. It's autumn, anyway. I think such lighting isn't a cause to deprive a photo be a FP. --Brateevsky {talk} 15:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me is great --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Colors not right, per Colin. Composition is ... well, nothing wrong with featuring an image that uses a vantage point widely used by tourists, as I've argued in the past, but this isn't an exceptional enough iteration of that. Daniel Case (talk) 22:54, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: sorry, but colors are accurate. The lighting is quite different than on the photo presented by Colin: very bright summer day vs cloudy autumn day (and it's overexposed a bit: white parts of the building on the summer picture are not white in reality). And I can't be responsible for other photographers who make photos with absolutely dull colors. Composition is... well, it is a problem - I still can't fly. So I can only agree with the nominator and support. --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Alex Florstein, I recognised the tell-tale effects of too much Lightroom "vibrance" when I first looked at the JPG. But if you want proof then see the EXIF data. Vibrance +79, Hue Adjustment Orange +4, Saturation Adjustment Orange +27, Saturation Adjustment Blue -14, Luminance Adjustment Orange -15, Luminance Adjustment Blue -13, Contrast +32, Clarity +45. Now some global tone adjustment is fine -- a little bluer sky for example, but these are frankly ridiculous settings for a documentary photograph. Our FPC requirements state "Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer...Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable."' Submit this as an artistically colour-enhanced piece of art if you like, but you can't claim these colours are "accurate". I don't think I've ever taken Vibrance past +25, ever mind +79. The strong Contrast +32 adjustment also affects global saturation. And Clarity is on the high side at +45. -- Colin (talk) 09:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
@Colin: nice to see you care about the content of Wikicommons and thanks for the investigation. Like in CSI TV series! But I still see no criminal here. I just corrected shooting inaccuracies caused by hazy weather and natural tendency of amateur Nikon cameras to make a little bit dim image. Thats it. --Alex Florstein (talk) 10:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
UPD: But I'll certainly consider your advices and criticism in further work. Thank you. --Alex Florstein (talk) 10:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Alex, this has nothing to do with "amateur Nikon cameras". I see you have chosen "Camera Neutral" for the colour profile. This is Adobe's simulation of Nikon's "Neutral" profile. It is slightly lower contrast/saturation than Nikon's "Standard" profile, which is simulated as "Camera Standard" in Lightroom. Another option is "Adobe standard" which is Adobe's own calibrated profile. But I have never read any review that suggests a D5300 or Lightroom are so awful at rendering colours than a vibrance adjustment of +79 is necessary to correct it! I think you should consider if your monitor is displaying colours correctly if you think these colours are accurate and fair. -- Colin (talk) 11:23, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Colin, may be it's partially my fault, I'm not supposed to blame D5300. But I usually had no problems with "Camera Neutral", this time, apparently, it has developed the adverse conditions. And I assure you that colors are real at all my photos. My monitor is calibrated. Anyway, your comments very important to me, I'm here to learn and I always try to listen to good advice. --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Abbaye d'Hautecombe.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 May 2016 at 22:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Abbey of Hautecombe from the Lake of Bourget
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mathis73 -- Mathis73 (talk) 22:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mathis73 (talk) 22:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Pretty motif! But not sharp enough for me. I also don't love the crop on the right, as I'd like to see the rest of that building, but that's a side point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Really a pity, great colors and composition. --King of ♠ 01:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 02:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Such glorious composition and colors! But so much unsharpness ... yet another regrettable example of how the best a DP/S can do is usually far from adequate here. Daniel Case (talk) 22:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:AtardecerPlayaDoForte1-feb2016.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 May 2016 at 22:09:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunset in do Forte beach, Cabo Frío, Brazil
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me --Ezarateesteban 22:10, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:09, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like the composition a fair deal. However, to me, this photo looks a lot better at thumbnail and full-page size than it does at full size. At full size, the sky looks noisy. Perhaps you could improve the photo by denoising the sky somewhat. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks @Ikan Kekek: I tried to denoise a bit all the image, look if it is enough, furthermore I provide the original source file, so if you or another user wants to improve the image I'll be very greatful, I authorize, off course, to upload the improves over this image. Best Regards and thanks for your revision --Ezarateesteban 23:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
That's a substantial improvement, to my eyes, though others may be able to do more. Moderate support from me now. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition --The Photographer (talk) 12:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry. Composition is good. Some details missing and a lot of disturbing elements (waste). Sharpness may be better too. --XRay talk 10:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition but overprocessed (see posterization on bathing suit and clothing). Daniel Case (talk) 22:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Maybe a old look? --The Photographer (talk) 22:42, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Test version

I am trying to generate a new version cloning out the biggest piece of waste and trying to avoid the possible posterization, give me your opinions please and if it is enough I'll generate the jpeg file--Ezarateesteban 23:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

AtardecerPlayaDoForte11-feb2016.tif

File:Elite Residential Area Ottawa Lamanai 10.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 May 2016 at 14:30:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mayan ruin - Administrative and Elite Residential Area, Ottawa
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Cephas - uploaded by Cephas - nominated by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cephas (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I love the composition and subject matter. The only thing I find to be a real drawback is the hazy light, but that's not close to a reason for me not to support featuring this photo, overall. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Almost a painting… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support more pictures from Lamanai! ;-) funny we both went there only a few days apart --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Marginal oppose Nice perspective, great detail, clearly processed with an eye towards preserving as much as possible without looking unnatural. But while it's the most "definitely a QI" QI I can imagine, it's a little too busy for me to call it an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'm a little surprised by your take on this. Couldn't you imagine a masterful European painting that looked like this? I can, though usually with Greek or Roman, rather than Mayan ruins. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: I see your point, although better lighting might have made that more evident. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Cape Skink Flowers.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 May 2016 at 07:07:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cape Skink (Trachylepis capensis) on purple Aster flowers.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Prosthetic_Head - uploaded by Prosthetic_Head - nominated by Prosthetic Head -- Prosthetic Head (talk) 07:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Prosthetic Head (talk) 07:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Interesting and high-quality photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Flash colors, shallow DOF, composition could be much better, now i dont know is it animal or flower about. --Mile (talk) 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your comment, I'm not sure what you mean by "Flash colors", I didn't use a flash - just sun light. DoF is quite somewhat shallow, but I don't personally find it a problem. I disagree about the compostition but respect your oppinion, it can be rather subjective. Prosthetic Head (talk) 10:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • I see its made with compact, hence some low IQ, i still dont like reflection on skin, and compo could be better. --Mile (talk) 06:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • {{neutral}}, I like it, but without Meta-data the experts here (not me) have no good clues what might be wrong.Be..anyone 💩 10:39, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support, updated. –Be..anyone 💩 11:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your comment, the meta-data must have got stripped from the file when I did the crop. I'll try to add it back. Prosthetic Head (talk) 10:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New version with complete meta-data included. Thanks for pointing this out Be..anyone. Prosthetic Head (talk) 11:14, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Arresting juxtaposition of animal and plants. Daniel Case (talk) 21:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Mengshäuser Kuppe mit Kruspis.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2016 at 06:12:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Jörg Braukmann (Milseburg) - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I don't know whether this will be judged an FP or only a good QI, but this is the only way to find out. I think it's a beautiful landscape, and it reminds me of some of the landscapes my father painted in New England in the late 60s and early 70s. It's a composition with several distinct grounds, if you like, rather than just a foreground, middleground and background, and then a sky with dramatic clouds. Among other things, I really love the very green mown grass crops in the foreground. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose from me, sorry. Certainly it is a nice scenery, but the image as such does not strike me outstanding nor even flawless (overexposed clouds). The ruined house on the lower right might have given an impressive subject :-) Foreground shows no mown grass but growing crops on a field, as does the middleground. Cropping, err, the crop out would give a better composition IMHO. Altogether nice but not exceptional. --Kreuzschnabel 09:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I respect your opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It feels like it could be part of a featured landscape photo. But it's not there all by itself. Plus there's a blown highlight on the cloud. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I understand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination - I like this photo a lot, but I understand perfectly why people aren't convinced to feature it. I've seen several photos since I nominated this one that really wow me. The standard of the best photos on this site is really high. With respect for both Jörg and the two people who posted reviews of this photo, I'd rather nominate another photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Khaoyai 06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2016 at 16:13:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Khunkay - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 16:13, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:13, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Solid FP --The Photographer (talk) 16:22, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good compo --Mile (talk) 16:25, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tyseria (talk) 17:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lots of heehee but no wow on my side, sorry. In other words: Definitely funny but not outstanding as a photograph. Sharpness impaired by noise. --Kreuzschnabel 18:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Per Kreuz, and I find the blurring in the middle of the picture frame very distracting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 20:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. INeverCry 20:18, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hehe trumps technical issues --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Mainly because of the blurring in the middle. It's a funny image though. --Cayambe (talk) 08:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 09:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Would be probably better with more DoF + less ISO, but I like it nonetheless --A.Savin 15:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kasir (talk) 10:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question A crop of the road below maybe ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KTC (talk) 07:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good shoot. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unless you're the lead elephant, the view never changes. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Guepier d'europe au parc national Ichkeul.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2016 at 15:18:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
The main subject is the bird, however, everything else is important too and pay attention to every detail is relevant because small details is what make a ecepcional image. --The Photographer (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For 500mm on K5 its OK. That shadow in eye problem a bit. I dont mind that stick, not problem. --Mile (talk) 16:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tyseria (talk) 17:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Bit loss of detail on the plumage but still very impressive. --Kreuzschnabel 18:15, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:58, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zcebeci (talk) 12:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good. Charles (talk) 16:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good picture, bad work. All over posterisation and luminance noise. Maybe it comes from over-sharpening and de-noising at the same time. --Hockei (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I could be happier with a crop on the left, but overall I don't have a problem. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Cenzura.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2016 at 14:55:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Allegory of communist censorship, analogue picture taken in 1989 in Poland
  • @Jacek Halicki: In the description, the date is given as 1989, while in the date field it says "1 October 1982, 19:00:00". INeverCry 21:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noisy background does not fit this one. I like 4th version, but face. --Mile (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above. I guess it was impossible to avoid a certain degree of grain --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 07:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral A great portrait of a newspaperman Face-smile.svg. But without knowing more about the circumstances of the image's creation, I can't decide whether to let the noise go or not. Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the grainy look. --Code (talk) 19:49, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Annunciation (Leonardo).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2016 at 08:53:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Annunciation (Leonardo).jpg

File:Rosapelikan beim Putzen des Gefieders.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2016 at 20:58:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rosapelikan while cleaning the plumage.

File:Gruga-Mustergärten-Bee-Home-Garden-2016.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2016 at 20:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Show garden Bee Home Garden inside Grugapark
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Show garden Bee Home Garden inside Grugapark. This area of the park is a "showroom" for landscape contractors.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm not sure if all is enough sharp Ezarateesteban 22:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice scenery + well composed, sharpness is OK --A.Savin 00:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Per A.Savin. Interesting and unusual photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:34, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but the composition is too busy. The elements on the left pull toward the left while the elements on the right pull toward the right, leaving nothing to draw the eye to the center. The cut-off tree on the top right is also not ideal. --King of ♠ 02:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per KoH. INeverCry 04:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose technically as good as usual, but the composition is too busy, therefore not FP for me. --Hubertl 17:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I really like this composition because it seems full but well-ordered, the quality is good, beautiful colors. Ultimately it looks messy, but it is not.--LivioAndronico (talk) 18:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too many straights lines in too many directions.--Jebulon (talk) 20:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per all the other opposers. There are all the elements of a featured picture here. Trouble is, there's more than enough for one picture. Daniel Case (talk) 06:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Daniel: It's not my fault that there is more than enough :) In this case I tried to photographed the show garden in a favourable way. The characteristic of a show garden is that all elements of a "normal" garden are concentrated at small space. The same, Jebulon,the same is the case with the straight lines. Normally all these elements had been distributed over a larger area - but here gardeners show many possibilities. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
I don't blame you for wanting to take the picture. It's clearly the picture's fault, not the photographer's Face-smile.svg. Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Basel - Roche-Turm mit Stadtansicht bei Abenddämmerung.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2016 at 19:50:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Basel: Roche Tower during dusk
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Switzerland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'm impressed that you avoided star trails completely, but could you please talk about the shape of the moon? I thought I was looking at some kind of eclipse, as the light and dark parts of the moon don't form a circular shape together. I like the rest of the picture but wish the upper crop of the trees on the left were less random-looking. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Image with very short exposure
Hi Ikan Kekek: I can't say much conserning shape of the moon. This is exactley how the camera the moon caputured. Look at the example image with the very short exposure. To retouch this eclipse-effect is not really difficult, but is it so distracting? Why do you think the crop is random? The image object is clearly defined: tower on the right side, the far away cityscape on the left side connected by the river rhine. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:28, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Yes, the strange shape of the moon is distracting to me, or I wouldn't have mentioned it, and for what it's worth, I don't see it in the short-exposure picture. The crop looks random on the trees on the left side of the picture, not above the building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
The image example with the short exposure was to demonstrate the moon-shape taken by the camera. Sadly you don't argue why the crop should be random. Do you want more or less trees? The trees on the left enframe the image in my opinion, I see no need to chance this, sorry. --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I didn't tell you to change the crop of the trees. Not all my comments require action. However, I would need for the moon to look more normal for me to consider supporting this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
You asked what I meant about the crop of the trees, so I'll try to explain. The trees have a very jagged shape. If there were a way to either include their tops or crop them in a way that seems satisfying (such that some thought about the uppermost shapes clearly was taken, however that could be done), I'd consider that superior. I'm looking again, and yeah, the moon really bothers me because it looks like a partial eclipse of the sun by the moon. But again, high praise for your stars! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
The trees look like they are looking after being cut in autumn-time the year before. Either the trees nor the shape of the moon are main objects of this image and I can't understand how they are distracting the whole image. But there is no need that we agree. If other users also mention that the moon-shape is disturbing I'll retouch it, but for the shape of the trees I'm not liable and I like this shape. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Because I look at the entire picture, not just whatever the photographer may think their subject was. I didn't say I insist you do anything with the trees. I may feel impelled to vote against what's otherwise a very nice picture because of the weird moon, and in spite of the great stars, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:09, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support the moon is a bit weird but you don't have to retouch it imo, it's not that important an element here. I like the composition and image quality very much. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poké95 06:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:57, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 07:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Looking again, I think I see a dust spot just below the upper rightmost tree branch. Please fix that (even if you won't fix the moon). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Following your description I can't find a dustspot. Please make a mark on the image. Thx. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
You have to look at the picture at full size. It's a black spot under the downward curve in a branch off the upper rightmost branch. I don't know how to mark a dustspot. How do I do it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
This wasn't a dustspot but a bird or s.th. like that. Dustspots are regulary not so black and much more bigger. I have erased it nevertheless. But for the image impression/quality it is irrelevant IMO. For the Annotation tool look at Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. If it was a bird, no need to erase it. It just looked like a black spot to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 02:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another impeccable blue-hour skyline (IIRC, don't we have a day version of this shot somewhere?) Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Daniel Case: Not quite the same with but nearly and not a day-image but a sunset: File:Basel - Sonnenuntergang am Rheinufer.jpg --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Hornbill closeup profile 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 May 2016 at 13:16:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Southern yellow-billed hornbill (Tockus leucomelas). Pilanesberg national park, South Africa.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Prosthetic_Head - uploaded by Prosthetic_Head - nominated by Prosthetic Head -- Prosthetic Head (talk) 13:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Prosthetic Head (talk) 13:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, the sharpness is not enough and I also would not have promoted it to QI. --A.Savin 14:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Savin, & I see the the lighting and the close crop on the beak as issues. INeverCry 18:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A.Savin, INeverCry, I think you are being too harsh on sharpness. Many of our bird FPs are low MP such as 6MP or much less. This is 16MP from a compact camera. Downsized to 6MP version would be a fairer comparison to many FP. The crop is tight and the face in some shadow but the backlit beak is extraordinary. I can't find another photo like it. I think it shouldn't be dismissed so easily. I wonder if extending the left a little (possibly with a little creative Photoshop if no wider crop possible) and lifting the shadows might help. -- Colin (talk) 20:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • For me, the main issues are the crop (it almost gives the visual impression that the bird's beak would straighten out a bit if he had more room) and the shadow on the face and neck. I could support the image if something like what you suggest was done about that. INeverCry 20:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • There are also some sharpening artefacts at 6mpix, and given a relatively small resolution like 6mpix I may demand better quality. --A.Savin 23:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support - Nice picture, but I do feel the crops are tight on both the left and right. However, I completely agree with Colin on the backlit beak. Being able to see the blood vessels in the beak is amazing, and for that reason, I offer this photo mild support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Like INeverCry I don't like the cropping --Rettinghaus (talk) 09:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the comments, I personally like the lighting - it's a matter of taste and which features one wants to highlight. I agree the crop is a little close to the end of the beak, unfortunatly the only way to extend it would be to add "background" by synthesis which I don't want to do. If that means it's not suitable for FP I'm ok with that. Cheers! Prosthetic Head (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I had a play with synthesising a little more background, not sure about the result and even if I can get it looking perfect I don't really like the idea of inventing pixels.
    Hornbill with synthetic BG
    Prosthetic Head (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - In that version, there are some strange artifacts to the left of the beak. Otherwise, I like it better, and since you're using a bokeh that blurs the boundaries of everything beyond recognition, anyway, why is it a problem for you also to fudge things by extending those blurred colors a bit to the left? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crop is never going to work for me. Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Something went wrong in processing, theres a cloning flaw (see annotation) --Kreuzschnabel 07:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Lápida cerca de San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 147.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 May 2016 at 04:52:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I find this photograph very moving. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me it was really shocking,… There are many places in the world where the location of an accident becomes in a kind of memorial where temporarily flowers, candles but also permanently gravestones are placed/erected. In this case they left a big deal more there and just removed the bodies. I happened to talk to Chilean colleagues a few days ago about this picture and they confirmed me that this is quite unique in their country and don’t know another example of this. Thank you Ikan for the nomination! Poco2 09:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank, you, Poco, for the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • I think stuff might be interesting, but that have to be explained (description). --Mile (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Poco, would you like to add a bit more content to the file description? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I’d prefer to see the horizon in the background to get a better feeling of dimensions. --Kreuzschnabel 09:36, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
    Sorry, Kreuzschnabel, I can only offer this crop Poco2 20:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Moving and technichally good photograph. Agree with others it could be improved by a bit more description and perhapse a very similar photo that includes the horizon would give sense of place. Prosthetic Head (talk) 13:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I didn't expect to support this one until I looked at it in closeup. What makes it, I guess, is that background, perhaps the way it suggests the vastness of time juxtaposed with this one life, and death. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 21:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:47, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 12:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2013.07.01-21-Wustrow-Neu Drosedow-Blaugruene Mosaikjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 May 2016 at 17:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue hawker - Aeshna cyanea, male.
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please consider that insects don't have real colours. The colour arises from light refraction in its skin (or what ever the name is). --Hockei (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Cordoba Center Hotel in Cordoba, Spain.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 May 2016 at 16:31:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cordoba Center Hotel by night.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ElBute - uploaded by ElBute - nominated by ElBute -- ElBute (talk) 16:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It is a night view of the Cordoba Center Hotel in Cordoba, Spain, illuminated in blue because of the World Autism Awareness Day 2016.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ElBute (talk) 16:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, it´s a fine motif and well done, but not good enough to be featured. Especially because of the ghosts. They are avoidable. Therefore only QI IMO. --Hubertl 17:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree with Hubertl. Also, the composition is good but not super-compelling to me, though the context is a strong supporting point for the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
  • (weak) Symbol support vote.svg Support Well, I like it, especially the colours (blue lighting in blue hour) are nice. Regarding the ghosts, I see only one issue (people to the right of the entrance) and it is somewhat not a big deal for me. However, I would like to see this photo used somewhere (WP articles or so). So far only weak support. --A.Savin 02:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mile (talk) 11:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support though I would have crop a big part of the empty road at bottom. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:01, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Yeah, I think your suggested crop would help a lot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Ok guys, you're right. Could I do it right now or not because the image is being reviewed? In any case, I'll crop it as soon as the review process is finished. --ElBute (talk) 10:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC).
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Yes, you can do it now and then ping everyone who's voted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice blue-hour image of a street and lit building. Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The image has been cropped for some of you requested such action. I agree it looks better now. --ElBute (talk) 07:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I'm still not wowed by it, but it's enough better that I seriously considered supporting it for a feature. In the end, I'm Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)