Commons:Кандидати за изабране слике

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | հայերեն | +/−

Ово су кандидати за изабране слике. Уочите да ово није исто што и слика дана.

За архиву претходних номинација, погледајте: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

Постоји такође хронолошки списак изабраних слика.

Contents

Формалности[edit]

Номинација[edit]

Ако мислите да сте нашли или направили слику која може да се сматра вредном, онда је додајте испод у секцију номинације, на врх стране путем овог линка.(Упутства)

Пре него што то урадите, осигурајте да сте унели одговарајући опис слике, као и прикладну лиценцу.

Молимо гласајте користећи реч из вашег језика или одговарајуће шаблоне:

  • За - Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, 支持 , Tak,...
  • Против - No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, 反对 , Nie,...

Такође можете користити шаблоне {{Oppose}}(Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose) и {{Support}}(Symbol support vote.svg Support). Такође можете изразити да волите слику са {{I love}}(Nuvola apps package favorite.svgSymbol support vote.svg Support) или да сте неутрални {{Neutral}}(Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral).

Молимо покушајте да укључите неколико речи о томе зашто вам се (није) свидела слика, посебно када гласате против.

Политика за кандидате за изабране слике[edit]

  • На крају гласања, резултати ће бити одређени петнаестог дана од номинације.
  • Номинације од анонимних корисника су добродошле
  • Доприноси у разговорима од стране анонимних корисника су добродошли
  • Гласови анонимних корисника се не рачунају
  • Номинације се не рачунају као гласови. Подршка мора да буде експлицитно изречена.
  • Номинатори могу да повуку своју номинацију било када.
  • Запамтите, циљ Викимедијине Оставе је да пружи централну базу за слободне слике које би се могле користити у свим Викимедијиним пројектима, укључујући и могуће будуће пројекте. Ово није проста остава за википедијине слика, тако да о сликама не треба судити према томе да ли одговарају неком пројекту.
  • Слике могу да се уклоне са списка уколико немају подршке (не рачунајући номинаторов глас) после седмог дана.

Кандидат ће постати изабрана слика у складу са следећим условима:

  • Одговарајућа лиценца (наравно)
  • Најмање 7 гласова подршке
  • Однос гласова за и против мора да буде најмање 2:1 (двотрећинска већина)
  • Код две различите верзије исте слике, не могу обе бити изабране, већ само она са већим бројем гласова.

За упутства о томе како се процесују старе номинације, погледајте Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.

Кандидати за уклањање статуса изабране слике[edit]

Током времена, стандарди за изабране слике се мењају. Може бити одлучено да за неке слике које су некада биле "довољно добре", ово више није случај. Овде се наводе слике за које сматрате да више не заслужују да буду изабране. Ово захтева двотрећинску већину (и минимум од 5 гласова) за уклањање статуса. Ако нема 2/3 за уклањање, слика остаје изабрана. За ове радње, гласајте са {{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (заслужује да остане изабрана слика) или or {{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist (не заслужује да више буде изабрана слика). Молимо пружите и линк ка оригиналној номинацији за изабрану слику (појавиће се под "Links" на страни са описом слике). За остало, иста правила важе као и изнад. Молимо користите овај линк како бисте додали новог кандидата за уклањање статуса

Освежавање стране: purge this page's cache

Кандидати за изабране слике[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:2018 - Christiansborg from the Marble Bridge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 16:42:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Christiansborg

File:Red dragonfly in Abuja 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 12:20:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red dragonfly (Trithemis kirbyi) in Abuja

File:Charles Pope Caldwell (restoration).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 11:40:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

C. Pope Caldwell, a U.S. Representative from New York, ca. 1915

File:Mountain child.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 08:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A village girl, Palangan, Kurdistan, Iran
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Salar.arkan - uploaded by Salar.arkan - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 08:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 08:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very striking - an excellent portrait. Good background in the file description, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the combination of the portrait with the view of the village – a good environmental portrait of a child in the world it lives in. --Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan and Aristeas. At first, I had my doubts about the file title from an encyclopedic point of view, but on second thought I think it sums up the photo nicely. --Cart (talk) 09:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Should we rename? --Andrei (talk) 10:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 09:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Slightly bothered by the top-down angle, but not enough to stop me from supporting. Good wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 09:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 10:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 11:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- Coffeeandcrumbs 12:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Ildefonso, Oporto, Portugal, 2019-06-02, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 06:38:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Ildefonso church, Porto, Portugal

File:Puente de Don Luis I, Oporto, Portugal, 2019-06-02, DD 29-31 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 06:35:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dom Luis I bridge over the Douro river connecting Vila Nova de Gaia and Porto, in Portugal.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the Dom Luís I Bridge in the Douro River and the city of Porto during the blue hour from Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal. c/u/n by me, Poco2 06:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 06:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - That's beautiful. I'm not much bothered by the places that are blown out on the near bank from all the floodlights, but I'm wondering if you could dial back the building on the far bank with blueish light a little bit and recover some details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. There is one area where there is a little bit of aliasing going on, which I have made a note for. Cmao20 (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent, right. --Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Panorama vom Böllat.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 15:43:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view (220°) from the Böllat on the Swabian Jura near Burgfelden
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Germny
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panoramic view (220°) from the viewpoint Böllat on the Swabian Jura, including some summits of the Alps on an outstanding clear day. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Very weak oppose Sorry to do this as I very much like a lot of your work, but this doesn't do a lot for me. It's great quality and interesting, but I don't think it's outstanding in terms of either lighting or composition. It's just not a very exciting day in terms of light conditions, and the sweep of the panorama seems a little bit random. (For what it's worth I quite often have this objection to very wide panoramas, that they have no real clear focus.) Cmao20 (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Technically well done and the compositional balance shows careful thought. Unfortunately, not enough wow for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I'm not as jaded as you guys. With a panorama that extensive and sharp, I don't really care that much about the overall composition, because I'm too busy looking at the details and enjoying them. This kind of work still wows me and merits a star, in my opinion! Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose It’s hard to set into words why I think this is both fascinating and not featurable. Quality is brilliant, but then mostly per Cmao20 – there’s no clear message here, this picture doesn’t "talk" to me, it just conveys loads and loads of visual information on a fine clear day. Might be a matter of taste about what makes an image "special", but since you asked for our opinion, well, there’s mine. The dark part on the left is a bit distracting; I think it would work better without that, though that means outcropping the Alps. Technically it’s a bit oversharpened I’m afraid (see Plettenberg transmitter tower). --Kreuzschnabel 06:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral for now. There are some vertical stripes or banding in the sky, hard to see, but irritating; I suggest to remove them. --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per lack for good lighting and composition -- Colin (talk) 08:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:William Etty - Male Nude, Kneeling, from the Back - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 14:40:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male Nude, Kneeling, from the Back by William Etty

File:Edvard Munch - Madonna - Google Art Project.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 14:21:07
SHORT DESCRIPTION

*Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per nom. --Cart (talk) 15:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Move to keep per comment below. --Cart (talk) 08:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Well spotted Ikan! I feel silly now for not checking it better. This version has the signature in the upper left corner while it is in the lower left corner on the other one. Even if an artwork can be shot in different lights, I doubt it will move the signature. Since they are two different paintings, I think we can keep them both and I've changed my Delist to Keep. Also 'ping' 4nn1l2, who raised the subject on the FPC talk page. --Cart (talk) 08:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I didn't look at the placement of the signatures, but I'm quite familiar with artists doing a sketch or sketchy treatment of a subject and then working on it again as a fully-realized painting. For example, we have at least 4 pastel versions of a composition my father then realized as a very large painting, and every version of the composition is different. I'll vote to Symbol keep vote.svg Keep, too, as this seems like a good enough picture to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Boothsift Is Here 05:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep these are two different paintings of the same motif, similar to what Van Gogh did with his en:Bedroom in Arles. See en:Madonna (Munch painting) for more versions/interpretations. --El Grafo (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep --Claus 09:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I think keep as well. They are indeed two different paintings. Munch did lots of them. --Peulle (talk) 09:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination OK, neither did I know nor spot it. Thanks for correction. (Still the quality is not very good, but that's not sufficient for removal, I guess) --A.Savin 15:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Woolsey Fire - tree ridge in flames 20181119-PB-008.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 11:55:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tree ridge in flames during the 2018 Woolsey Fire, California, US.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fire
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Peter Buschmann, United States Forest Service, USDA - uploaded, some additional editing and nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 11:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking photo of a terrible event. Some parts are a little noisy, but given the size of the photo and the conditions for shooting it, I think it's ok. Applying noise reduction will only make it blotchy and the 'grain' goes well with the motif. -- Cart (talk) 11:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive and frightening, concerning noise I agree with Cart --Isiwal (talk) 12:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 13:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart. Better a bit noisy than mush. --Aristeas (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Pretty good depiction of Hell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Ikan, you and the photographer had the same thought. Another one of his photos from that fire had the original title "Sunset in Hell". --Cart (talk) 09:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I'm not surprised and wouldn't have thought my reaction was original. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Georges Ernest Boulanger by Atelier Nadar.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 02:05:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Georges Ernest Boulanger

File:Elizabeth Glendower Evans (cropped).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 02:02:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elizabeth Glendower Evans
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by The Washington Times - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 02:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like that in this profile, some of her character seems to come through. I feel a stoicism, weariness of having to keep fighting, perhaps, but a great strength and determination. I don't remember seeing a portrait of a woman from that period wearing a corduroy blouse or dress, but she is also wearing a kind of hat that was stylish at the time. I think she would have been a very interesting person to have a conversation with, if she could have spared the time in between all of her important work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Salzburg Michaelskirche Deckenfresko-4118.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 22:55:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Дві лелеки на снігу.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 21:59:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Great pose and unique capture but the image quality (especially sharpness) is not quite at the level of many bird FPs nowadays. Cmao20 (talk) 22:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting background which is brighter than and similar in color to the subject. -- King of ♠ 03:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree. The snow background for black and white birds is not working. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Loads of wow, and the background works for me – I have no difficulties to see the birds in front of it. What doesn’t work for me is both heads being out of focus. Pity! --Kreuzschnabel 07:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sharpness, it´s a pity! --Isiwal (talk) 09:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Coconut octopus in shell.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 18:45:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coconut octopus in shell
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by q phia - uploaded - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice catch but the cropped shell at the bottom is an issue --Poco2 20:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Sorry but I can't help but agree with Poco here. It's interesting and would probably be QI if taken by a Commons user, but for that reason it's not FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 22:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Poco -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Perth (AU), Elizabeth Quay Bridge -- 2019 -- 0375-9.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 16:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elizabeth Quay Bridge, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

File:Casa en Moñúx, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 47.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 13:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info An unusual shot, but I find enough interest in the shapes and colours here to make it IMO a solid choice for a feature. See what you think. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cool, nice catch, than you for the nom Cmao20! Poco2 20:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Quite nice except the crop at the left, a bit tight -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support --Isiwal (talk) 08:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special and not really sharp. --Hockei (talk) 16:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I can understand that you don't think it's anything special, as wow is subjective and this isn't an obvious case, but I'm not really sure about the idea that it's not sharp. It seems very sharp to me; can you perhaps be specific about where you can see unsharpness? Cmao20 (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Nice house and flowers but not really a "wow" for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei. —kallerna (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ailurus fulgens - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 13:56:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Ailuridae_(Red_Pandas)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Because awww. More seriously, this is a high-resolution shot with excellent quality of an endangered species, and it's far superior to the existing FPs: this one, which is a similar view of the face alone but which has much lower resolution than this shot, and this one which shows the whole animal but is very low-resolution for an FP nowadays. created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking facial expression -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks Cmao20 for the nomination and the laudatio --Llez (talk) 14:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nomination. --Aristeas (talk) 14:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I don't like zoo pictures. They never can outclass wildlife pictures or reach the same status. --Hockei (talk) 17:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Understood; thanks for the review. Personally I don't mind zoo pictures as long as it isn't obvious that this is an unnatural setting, and of course for some less common animals zoos can be the best realistic opportunity to get a high quality image. It is worth noting that both the other FPs of red pandas are also of zoo specimens. Cmao20 (talk) 20:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It doesn't change my sensation. I'll never support zoo pictures in FPC. This has nothing to do with whether I find the quality bad or good. Certainly are zoo pictures of rare animals and plants valuable and maybe important for documentation. But nothing for FPC in my eyes. BTW, I gave no oppose but a neutral. Even if I don't like the background. --Hockei (talk) 16:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:34, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 07:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Heiligenkreuz Kalvarienberg 20191012 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 06:54:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Calvary Heiligenkreuz

File:Hacienda San Jorge - Los Cancajos 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 21:05:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Park and pool, Hacienda San Jorge, Los Cancajos, Breña Baja, La Palma, Canary Islands
  • @Hockei: That's a bit unfair. You're opposing this not because of the image but you have something against touristy places. --Boothsift Is Here 05:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Interesting point of view while my reasoning outweighs for example "no wow", "nothing special" and so on who are constantly stated and accepted here. --Hockei (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As I already said: It is a manmade landscape --Llez (talk) 10:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Official Portrait.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 19:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is an American politician and activist who serves as the U.S. Representative for New York's 14th congressional district. The district includes the eastern part of the Bronx and portions of north-central Queens in New York City. She is a member of the Democratic Party.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by US House of Representatives - uploaded by Wafflepancake34 - nominated by Persia -- PERSIA♠ 19:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PERSIA♠ 19:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A good portrait of a person very much in the limelight at the moment (time will tell if she actually ends up being an important historical figure in the long term). --Peulle (talk) 08:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The source link now produces a different photo. How should that be handled, and do you think the new photo is better? I'd have to see it blown up to the same size, but on the face of it, I tend to think it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment the old one was made by Franmarie Metzler; U.S. House Office of Photography (according to EXIF), so the assumption of {{PD-USGov}} is reasonable. The new one does not contain any information on author or copyright status, so until that is cleared up I would not recommend uploading it here. --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC) Nevermind: https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/copyright --El Grafo (talk) 09:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not a bad portrait. As far as I can tell with my non-existing experience in portrait photography, it's reasonably well lit (apart from that shadow of the collar), sharp where it needs to be sharp, and her facial expression looks fine as well. I'd probably support this at VI or Wikipedia FP, but for Commons FP I feel a bit under-wowed. I mean, in the end it is just another formal portrait of someone in front of a US flag. We've got hundreds, maybe thousands of these, and I don't see what makes this one so special for it to be considered among the best of the best at Common. It's good, but not awesome. --El Grafo (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree El Grafo Seven Pandas (talk) 14:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per El Grafo --Boothsift Is Here 05:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Apis mellifera - Prunus padus - Keila.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 17:18:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Apis mellifera on Prunus padus

File:Mangart 17.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 16:03:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Mangart Pass seen from the Via Ferrata trail going up to the mountain.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Slovenia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support —kallerna (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice shot. But the shadow on the rock is too dark for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Not too dark for me. Excellent form to my eyes, and I really enjoy the variety of colors and shapes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good dramatic shot to me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do agree with Famberhost --Poco2 20:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A quite common view from a mountain while moderate visibility conditions. Not outstanding for me. --Milseburg (talk) 20:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Famberhorst. Too harsh contrast; it’s a nice scene but not the best lighting of it. Plus I think there’s simply too much within the frame. Concentrate on the winding road on the left, or the arête in center, that might make an impressive FP. --Kreuzschnabel 07:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the comments. I like the complex composition, but do you prefer this (or this)? —kallerna (talk) 07:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great picture (could probably work a bit the contrast, reduced the highlights and increase a tad the shadow), however I'm pretty sure this would be wonderful if printed in large. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I've no problem with the shadow. --Hockei (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 07:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Famberhorst, The strong shadow on the mountain makes it look more like a hole in the middle of the photo than a mountain. --Cart (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Funkturm Arsenal Blitze.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 06:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lightning at the radio tower in Arsenal
  • @Kreuzschnabel: Yeah, for that reason, I'm not expecting very good results. I don't know if Linie can fix this--Boothsift Is Here 08:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Boothsift: I just rotated the image (~ 1-2° clockwise), that's why there is not much more to see. Linie29 (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It works for me. --Dinkum (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just the right moment --Michielverbeek (talk) 09:57, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 10:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment would be helpful if @Linie29: updated the file to mention the changes made in Photoshop.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Kreuzschnabel. Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Detail of a pier in Akaroa, Canterbury, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 05:51:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail of a pier in Akaroa, Canterbury, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Other_architectural_elements
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's a detail of the pier in Akaroa. I just like it, I find it quite nice to look at. -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Certainly nice to look at but little wow to me. Mediocre quality, rather uninteresting flat perspective. --Kreuzschnabel 08:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I really enjoy moving my eyes around this. How do you find it if you consider it a composition of lines and forms like a work of abstract flat art? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:43, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ...although I understand the idea it doesn't still wow me Poco2 10:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kreuzschnabel --Fischer.H (talk) 16:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support These are pictures that we see too little here! In my opinion, the quality is excellent.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Famberhorst --Llez (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco.--Ermell (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)}
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poco --Boothsift Is Here 06:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose technically excellent, interesting textures, but not a wow image --Isiwal (talk) 08:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 14:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow and sharpness is not very good, sorry. --Hockei (talk) 17:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:View of Kaikoura Ranges, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Kaikoura Ranges, New Zealand

File:Reading room of the State Library of Massachusetts-9318.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 02:13:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reading room of the State Library of Massachusetts, Boston
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hey Colin, I apologize for not getting back to you earlier. I took the photo as part of the Culture Crawl event during WikiConference North America on Friday. The conference ended today and I honestly didn't have much time taking care of this. I'll fly home from Boston to San Francisco tomorrow and take a closer look. Hopefully, I'll be able to fix the issues that you addressed. Thanks a lot for your feedback, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)--Ermell (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not that wowed--Boothsift Is Here 06:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Boothsift on this one; the wow factor is not there for me. --Peulle (talk) 08:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The wow is subtle but it's there for me; however I oppose because per Colin I'm not convinced by the image quality. There's some odd banded textures here and there, and the image as a whole gives the impression of being slightly unsharp and oversharpened to compensate, if that makes sense. Cmao20 (talk) 14:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin, a pity. --A.Savin 19:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Boothsift. —kallerna (talk) 11:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination After coming back from the conference and taking a closer look, I agree with the opposers. The image quality isn't good enough and the wow factor on the lower end compared to some of my other work. So, I withdraw. Thanks a lot for the feedback. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum-9336.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 02:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tubes at Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum (former Chestnut Hill Pumping Station), Boston

File:Close-up view of a bioluminescent beetle Elateroidea.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 00:27:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bioluminescent beetle Elateroidea
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 11:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing - Benh (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Definitely not something you see every day! Cmao20 (talk) 14:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noisy, DOF too shallow and it looks at least partially posterized to me. --Hockei (talk) 17:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ebrach Kirche rose window Orgel P4252411efs.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2019 at 23:05:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seufert organ from 1743 in the former abbey church in Ebrach
  • @Poco a poco: This is not a panorama. The picture was taken in high resolution shot (HRS) mode where the sensor moves to catch more pixel. Works only with a trypod.--Ermell (talk) 20:33, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:00, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The image looked a bit odd to me in close up. I had a peek at the EXIF and you have got very high values for colour NR settings, which would tend to reduce detail and create a plastic effect. Compare our existing FP File:Kloster Ebrach BW 5.JPG which despite lower resolution, looks more realistic and natural on the figures and carvings. I've never had to raise Lightroom's standard level of Colour NR in my own photos, only touching Luminance NR when required. -- Colin (talk) 18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Colin: I know the picture, of course. The rosette alone is not that difficult. If you take the organ into the picture it is always too dark because the church only has windows in the upper part. I have summarized three differently exposed pictures using LRenfuse. The smoothing of the edges of the window took some time.--Ermell (talk) 20:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Enfuse isn't the best program for HDR. You might be better off trying Lightroom's own tool (if you have a current version) but the best I have found is PtGui and then taking the 32-bit TIFF back into LR. If you want me to experiment for you, drop me an email with a link to the raw files and I'll send you back a JPG. -- Colin (talk) 07:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Colin. Too strong NR, and weird tones rendering. - Benh (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There is some valid criticism of the strong noise reduction above, but it's OK for me given the very high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 17:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Iglesia Slettebakken, Bergen, Noruega, 2019-09-08, DD 97.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2019 at 06:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Slettebakken church, Bergen, Norway
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the particular Slettebakken Church located in the Slettebakken neighborhood, Årstad borough in the city of Bergen, Hordaland county, Norway. It's part of the Slettebakken parish in the Fana deanery in the Diocese of Bjørgvin. The large, concrete, modern-style church was built in 1970 by the architect Tore Sveram. The church, which seats up to 600 people, was consecrated on 20 December 1970 and has become a landmark in the city due to its unique curved roof line. c/u/n by me, Poco2 06:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 06:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just a QI. The clouds are distracting and the light is very ordinary. -- Colin (talk) 15:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I also think it could be hard to get a really satisfying form out of this building. Some well-placed clouds on the upper left might do it, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO people are being a little harsh on this. It's not my kind of building, but it's certainly architecturally unusual. I'm not really sure how one could produce a more compelling shot of this church; the angle seems good, and the image quality is good as usual. Cmao20 (talk) 14:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Same. Nothing special. - Benh (talk) 16:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others--Boothsift Is Here 05:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Poco2 06:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:North of tehran.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 16:35:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

north of tehran from above of the milad tower
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 16:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 16:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Tehran is a polluted city. in the nature day people go out of the city in nature and number of cars decreases. because that and wind and after 3 days raining I was able to photograph Tehran in its cleanest condition from above milad tower. --Amirpashaei (talk) 06:06, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looks very good to me, but please fix the perspective at the right. --A.Savin 18:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @A.Savin: thanks for your offer. I fixed the perspective. --Amirpashaei (talk) 18:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
      • Fine with me, Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 19:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow and very detailed --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Assuming this is a panorama - how many frames wide and how many frames tall? HDR as well? --GRDN711 (talk) 02:20, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @GRDN711: 11 vertical (portrait) frames with 50mm lens and each frame contain 3 pictures with different levels of exposure. A total of 33 pictures--Amirpashaei (talk) 06:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Some of the cars look funky dude to HDR. —kallerna (talk) 06:29, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Michielverbeek. --Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is a stitching error (indicated on note) and yes some of the cars look very odd. You can get most stitching software to output the individual warped frames and you may be able to use a middle-exposure to fix the cars with Photoshop. It is very detailed though a cloudy/sunny sky is problematic for multi-photo panoramas as the lighting changes. The shadowed/bright areas look nice when you see the whole image, but they are less good when studying the detail -- a consistent lighting would probably be better. Wrt processing, it is very constrasty and some areas quite dark. -- Colin (talk) 15:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @Colin: thanks for your good criticism and suggestions. I will edit tomorrow and will fix the problems.--Amirpashaei (talk) 18:17, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful composition and fascinating to browse at 100% at the same time. - Benh (talk) 10:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info @Colin: I improved the cars and fixed stitching error. please consider the last upload. thanks for your suggestions.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Nationaal Park Dwingelderveld 20-08-2019 (actm.) 10.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 16:10:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info National Park Dwingelderveld is a nature reserve in Drenthe. Pinus sylvestris under threatening clouds in a flowering heather field.
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I liked this on QIC and still like it. Something I didn't think of then is that a crop on the bottom, if done right, could improve the form. Maybe about a finger's width's height from the bottom at full screen would do it. See what you think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Thank you. I mentioned in QIC that this is probably the nicest of this series that I've seen so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pleasant enough countryside, but photographically just a QI. Lacks wow. -- Colin (talk) 15:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I enjoy the colors but per Colin Poco2 09:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Painterly. Cmao20 (talk) 13:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No reason for FP nomination --Fischer.H (talk) 16:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose A textbook example on the rule of thirds :) but not that special in my eyes. Please clone/crop out the twigs on the right edge. --Kreuzschnabel 07:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Twigs removed. Thank you for your attention.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Subdued soothing colors that works well with the bleak landscape. --Cart (talk) 12:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Colin. —kallerna (talk) 11:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ālī Qāpū in golden time.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 15:34:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ālī Qāpū after sunrise in golden time
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 15:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 15:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 02:35, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Amirpashaei, can you comment a bit more about the processing of this work? 25 frames is a lot of frames. Have you used all of them for the whole frame or only portions of it (sky)? what is the time window between the first and last frame? Poco2 10:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info @Poco a poco: picture merged from 25 pictures. but 5 frames. each frame contain 5 pictures from dark to light for HDR. 5 frames located in the center, top left, top right. bottom left and bottom right. because of using tilt shift lens, there is no perspective problem and you don't need to perspective correction in photoshop. It takes 1-2 minutes to take the first and last photos. The center frame could be missed but I captured it because more sharpness. After 15 minutes I captured ali qapu in blue time. same method. No change in position and camera and lens . https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C4%80l%C4%AB_Q%C4%81p%C5%AB_in_blue_time.jpg for monument of this picture (golden time) I used from second picture (blue time) . because monument in low light had more glory. But the sky light of each photo is its own--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
      • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Poco2 21:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Both photos (golden and blue) are very nice to look at as a whole. In detail the quality suffers towards the edge of the frame, which is quite blurred with strong purple CA. There are also some HDR artefacts where bright areas with perhaps a little movement have created an unreal effect. You might be able to rescue those by using a single middle-exposure frame, or by trying to align the exposures better. I don't know what software you use, but in PtGui it can be best to let it align all the frames rather than picking the option where it thinks multiple exposures are already aligned by using a tripod -- with HDR highlights with fine detail, the slightest movement can wreck the tonemapping algorithm. Compared to the blue photo, I see you have Photoshopped out some metalwork on the roofs and the fountain pipe in the middle of the pond. I think those are permanent features you should retain: we are not just trying to create a lovely picture but also to faithfully capture what it looked like. Our best HDR FPs have handled the light better than this, particularly on the left side which appears quite blown. Is the vignetting natural due to the lens or did you add some in processing? I think perhaps if better processed this might pass at FP due to the lovely light, but at the moment there are too many flaws. -- Colin (talk) 16:05, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @Colin: thanks for your good criticism and suggestions. I will edit tomorrow and will fix the problems. --Amirpashaei (talk) 18:32, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Colin as well --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose regretfully per Colin, for now at least. I also think it would be better with a tighter crop so there was a bit less featureless space. Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I still think it would be better with a tighter crop, but it's good enough for FP now. Cmao20 (talk) 20:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Colin: , I improved the picture as you told. I would be happy to report if there is another problem. Thanks for your nice suggestions colin. --Amirpashaei (talk) 18:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support now. That's a good improvement on the blown areas and HDR issues. Wrt the crop that Cmao20 suggests, it is difficult to crop out the lovely sky with its variation in tone. I think I am fine featuring this crop as people can always made a 3:2 or 16:9 crop from it and upload to a different filename if they want. -- Colin (talk) 18:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak weak support Some strange artifacts at the bottom, a blurred area on the left, and stranges edges (scafolding notably). But otherwise a beautiful composition, and nice colours. - Benh (talk) 10:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @Benh: thanks benh. bottom of picture is pond floor and there is some Scratch even in raw files. --Amirpashaei (talk) 10:39, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

@Uoaei1:, @Boothsift: , @Cmao20: I improved the picture as colin told. I would be happy to report if there is another problem. Thanks--Amirpashaei (talk) 14:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

  • @Benh: you're right benh. in the pond floor I found some noise because HDR processing and I removed them. thanks. --Amirpashaei (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Trappist Beer 2013-08-31.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 15:21:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Drink
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Philip Rowlands - uploaded by Philip Rowlands - nominated by Claus Obana -- Claus 15:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus 15:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately the focus to the Achel is not well done --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support per Michiel - I like the composition, and the focus on the sides, though not pinpoint, is IMO not bad. We use this photo on Wikivoyage's article on alcoholic beverages. I'm surprised it's not a VI. It seems like it should be nominated to VIC in the scope Trappist beers, regardless of the results here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm just not impressed with the quality. There is back focus. "Orval" beer is well in focus, but other are little blurry -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:22, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Good, valuable for illustrative purposes, but the focus is not good enough for FP IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Haeckel Discomedusae 8.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 14:30:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • @Basile Morin: That is true and you can kind of tell just by looking here. However, I don't think it's enough to oppose unless someone convinces me otherwise--Boothsift Is Here 05:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Церковь Параскевы Пятницы - 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 06:55:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old wooden bridge and church in Leshino
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Mpr89 - nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - That scene and all that decay are very affecting, but Mpr89, you need to clean up a large number of small dust spots. I think that will be challenging. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The quality of this image is not perfect, but the atmosphere and composition are fascinating and get it over the line for me. Cmao20 (talk) 08:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Much better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:47, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes definitely -- one of my WLM'18 top favourites, the scenery has even some "apocalyptic" touch. --A.Savin 10:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Oversharpening --Wilfredor (talk) 14:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The colours look odd...have you used a filter or something? —kallerna (talk) 15:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @Kallerna: I can't comment anything about filters, but if you compare shooting time (after midnight) light conditions with daylight, the colors might look a bit differently. --Ivar (talk) 16:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 17:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The grey sky adds something to the composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'd like to have the moon a bit lower and not to be overexposed. But still solid FP, great atmosphere! --Podzemnik (talk) 23:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I also find the spooky, after-midnight lighting to be alluring but wonder if this image would be stronger if the moon was cropped off at the top. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - For my part, I'd rather the moon not be cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Podzemnik--Ermell (talk) 22:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tight crop at the top, unfortunately we can't decide to put the moon so high or lower, otherwise there's enough sky in the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 06:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For the atmosphere alone! - Benh (talk) 10:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Like a Tim Burton movie. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:55, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 12:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia

File:Collegiata dei Santi Nazaro e Celso sagrestia trittico Brescia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2019 at 21:30:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tryptyc by Paolo da Caylina il Vecchio in the Santi Nazaro e Celso church in Brescia.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - No-one said it should be easy to shoot an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course you are right, and I absolutely did not want to criticize you, I just wanted to say that I (personally) feel that this image is excellent, even when it would be even better without the reflection. But because my comment is cryptic, I have crossed it out (but still support the image). --Aristeas (talk) 13:24, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The left one ruins it for me as per Ikan--Boothsift Is Here 06:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but yes, the reflections on the left one are very disturbing. --Cayambe (talk) 09:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me, glare in such a static object in a public place like a church is not acceptable in an FP, especially since it can be avoided by something as simple as a polarizing filter or wait for the sun to move a bit and make a combo of two or three photos (it is after all a triptych, so easy to do in sections) to get the whole piece evenly lit. --Cart (talk) 21:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @W.carter: If you say it‘s so easy in Italian churches I cordially invite you to do better. And, please, look how mandy FPs we have in Italy, and specifically in Brescia. Cheers--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Something more, Carter, churches in Italy are not „public places“ --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:20190303 FIS NWSC Seefeld Men CC 50km Mass Start 850 7458.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2019 at 19:53:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

FIS Nordische Skiweltmeisterschaften Seefeld 2019 - Männer Langlauf 50km Massenstart Freie Technik. Bild zeigt Florian Notz (GER) und andere in der Verpflegungszone.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Granada - uploaded by Granada - nominated by -- Ralf Roletschek 19:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Die außermittige Fokussierung auf einen einzelnen Sportler, das Abpassen des genau richtigen Augenblicks und etwas Glück schafften hier ein exzellentes Bild. Von vorn bis hinten scharf wäre technisch ohnehin unmöglich und auch keine bessere Lösung. -- Ralf Roletschek 19:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too many of the skiers are out of focus and the scene is too chaotic.--Peulle (talk) 20:52, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment English, please. I don't speak German, and neither do many of the other people on here. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Out of the seeming chaos, a good and interesting, dynamic and eye-fulfilling composition is produced, and it's best seen simply at full-screen size. It has a lot of motion and interesting complexity. I doubt that enough people here would be able to get past notions of how individual human figures "should" be portrayed, so I don't really expect this to be featured, but I think it should be and is a much more interesting composition than we usually see at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The Sigma 120-300 in combination with the 1.4x tele converter is not the sharpest and wide open it produces strange halos around contrasting edges in unsharp areas (see e.g. the sunglasses of the other skiers). --Granada (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Since you yourself don't consider this an FP, I withdraw my supporting vote, and you as photographer have the right to withdraw the nomination if you like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's nice work, but the creator doesn't think it's FP, and in this example I think he/she is right about the haloes. Cmao20 (talk) 08:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe technically not perfect, but I love the composition. —kallerna (talk) 15:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Funny, but no FP for me. Random composition with cut-off feet, the person in the foreground is completely out of focus. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just not there for me --Boothsift Is Here 05:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per creator's !vote. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Bergtocht van S-charl naar Alp Sesvenna. 10-09-2019. (d.j.b) 14.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2019 at 16:01:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. View of the mountains from Alp Sesvenna. The freshly fallen snow. The lines and the clouds give this photo an extra dimension for me.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 23:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I feel as if there was something wrong with the white balance. (Too blueish.) — Draceane talkcontrib. 07:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support At first I agreed that it might be too blue, but honestly I think this is plausible winter lighting, and I love the mood. Cmao20 (talk) 08:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice view. Thanks for WB fixing. — Draceane talkcontrib. 10:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just an average winter landscape for me. The composition looks quite unbalanced, and the WB of the first version looked more realistic to me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Uoaei1 -- Karelj (talk) 14:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dull light, not a striking scene. —kallerna (talk) 15:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Uoaei1. I fail to see any clear compositional idea here. Fine scenery but random framing. --Kreuzschnabel 22:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others --Boothsift Is Here 06:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:35, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Uoaei1. Daniel Case (talk) 14:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Charents arch-msu-wlm-3093.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2019 at 14:11:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ararat Arc
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Armenia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Matthias Süßen - uploaded by Matthias Süßen - nominated by Smial -- Smial (talk) 14:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, the photo could show a little less noise and a little more depth of field, but the composition, the colours and the general impression convinced me absolutely. -- Smial (talk) 14:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --El Grafo (talk) 15:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dinkum (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition, but for me too noisy for FP --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now per Michiel. If the photo can be substantially denoised, I'd be happy to reconsider. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I am not a perfectionist but it's composition just falling apart --Andrei (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment@Michielverbeek, Ikan Kekek: I have uploaded a new version. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 10:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A spledid view. --Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A nice view, but the crop is slightly off. Also technical problems. —kallerna (talk) 13:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Thanks for uploading the new version. I'll consider whether to abstain, but right now, I'll continue to oppose because it's still quite a lot more noisy than what we usually feature, nowadays. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is looking better, but not sharp enough. --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Michiel--Boothsift Is Here 02:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice idea but it is noisy. That alone isn't enough to kill it for me, but I also think the crop is very tight at the top, and I'd prefer to see a bit more space there. Cmao20 (talk) 08:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose Arch and wall are unsharp and noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Beautiful ceiling of isa khan tomb.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2019 at 09:11:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tomb of Isa Khan
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Photoguy ankit - uploaded by Photoguy ankit - nominated by Persia -- PERSIA♠ 09:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PERSIA♠ 09:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hi Persia, some tips for you: Before you nominate photos, please make sure they are properly categorized (this one was over-categorised), that they have a neutral name (subjective words like "beautiful" should not be included) and take a good look at the FP categories so that the image ends up in the right place if it is promoted. The description on the image page should also be better, neutral and include what actually is in the photo. I've fixed the categories and gallery, the rest is up to you. An FP is not just the photo, it is the texts related to the photo too. As nominator, you are responsible for the photo here at FPC even if it's not your own photo. --Cart (talk) 10:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @W.carter: Just a pet peeve, but I have fixed the typos in your paragraph--Boothsift Is Here 06:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Boothsift: Yeah, yeah... Shit happens when you edit on a computer with the auto-correct set to Swedish. It's an international site and most of us learn to live with such minor imperfections in the chatter here, since the Wiki policy is to not edit other users posts except to correct faulty codes. --Cart (talk) 06:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • It wasn't bad, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @W.carter: and @Ikan Kekek: That was really weird, IDK why I decided to do that. Please forgive me, I seriously don't know what thought popped in my brain--Boothsift Is Here 08:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Nothing personal to me. I'm an observer here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Boothsift, Ikan Kekek: Guys, it wasn't a big deal this time. I just mentioned the policy since it's good to keep in mind in less benevolent discussions. It's easy for the brain to do a crossover since we should correct such things in articles and file descriptions. No hard feelings and my apologies to Persia for this accidental discussion on their nomination. --Cart (talk) 10:14, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
I also apologize for making such an unwise decision --Boothsift Is Here 05:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hmmm, wonder how I missed this earlier. The quality is not perfect, but the ceiling is indeed very beautiful and I think deserves FP. Cmao20 (talk) 20:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Dhakeshwari Temple during puja.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2019 at 17:34:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dhakeshwari temple during puja.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by RockyMasum - uploaded by RockyMasum - nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Nice colorful scene, but the form isn't really doing anything for me. It feels to me more like an interesting snap to show and tell people about. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Most of the image is unsharp, and the colours look entirely artificial to me, at least hopelessly oversaturated. --Kreuzschnabel 18:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 22:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan --Andrei (talk) 00:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 07:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan--Boothsift Is Here 02:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting picture, but the image quality is very low for FPC. Cmao20 (talk) 08:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, low quality. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2019 (UTC)


Кандидати за брисање[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:2018 - Christiansborg from the Marble Bridge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 16:42:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Christiansborg

File:Red dragonfly in Abuja 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 12:20:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red dragonfly (Trithemis kirbyi) in Abuja

File:Charles Pope Caldwell (restoration).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 11:40:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

C. Pope Caldwell, a U.S. Representative from New York, ca. 1915

File:Mountain child.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 08:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A village girl, Palangan, Kurdistan, Iran
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Salar.arkan - uploaded by Salar.arkan - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 08:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 08:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very striking - an excellent portrait. Good background in the file description, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the combination of the portrait with the view of the village – a good environmental portrait of a child in the world it lives in. --Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan and Aristeas. At first, I had my doubts about the file title from an encyclopedic point of view, but on second thought I think it sums up the photo nicely. --Cart (talk) 09:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Should we rename? --Andrei (talk) 10:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 09:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Slightly bothered by the top-down angle, but not enough to stop me from supporting. Good wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 09:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 10:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 11:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --- Coffeeandcrumbs 12:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Ildefonso, Oporto, Portugal, 2019-06-02, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 06:38:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Ildefonso church, Porto, Portugal

File:Puente de Don Luis I, Oporto, Portugal, 2019-06-02, DD 29-31 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 06:35:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dom Luis I bridge over the Douro river connecting Vila Nova de Gaia and Porto, in Portugal.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the Dom Luís I Bridge in the Douro River and the city of Porto during the blue hour from Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal. c/u/n by me, Poco2 06:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 06:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - That's beautiful. I'm not much bothered by the places that are blown out on the near bank from all the floodlights, but I'm wondering if you could dial back the building on the far bank with blueish light a little bit and recover some details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. There is one area where there is a little bit of aliasing going on, which I have made a note for. Cmao20 (talk) 09:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent, right. --Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Panorama vom Böllat.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 15:43:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view (220°) from the Böllat on the Swabian Jura near Burgfelden
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Germny
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panoramic view (220°) from the viewpoint Böllat on the Swabian Jura, including some summits of the Alps on an outstanding clear day. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Very weak oppose Sorry to do this as I very much like a lot of your work, but this doesn't do a lot for me. It's great quality and interesting, but I don't think it's outstanding in terms of either lighting or composition. It's just not a very exciting day in terms of light conditions, and the sweep of the panorama seems a little bit random. (For what it's worth I quite often have this objection to very wide panoramas, that they have no real clear focus.) Cmao20 (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Technically well done and the compositional balance shows careful thought. Unfortunately, not enough wow for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I'm not as jaded as you guys. With a panorama that extensive and sharp, I don't really care that much about the overall composition, because I'm too busy looking at the details and enjoying them. This kind of work still wows me and merits a star, in my opinion! Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose It’s hard to set into words why I think this is both fascinating and not featurable. Quality is brilliant, but then mostly per Cmao20 – there’s no clear message here, this picture doesn’t "talk" to me, it just conveys loads and loads of visual information on a fine clear day. Might be a matter of taste about what makes an image "special", but since you asked for our opinion, well, there’s mine. The dark part on the left is a bit distracting; I think it would work better without that, though that means outcropping the Alps. Technically it’s a bit oversharpened I’m afraid (see Plettenberg transmitter tower). --Kreuzschnabel 06:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral for now. There are some vertical stripes or banding in the sky, hard to see, but irritating; I suggest to remove them. --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per lack for good lighting and composition -- Colin (talk) 08:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:William Etty - Male Nude, Kneeling, from the Back - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 14:40:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male Nude, Kneeling, from the Back by William Etty

File:Edvard Munch - Madonna - Google Art Project.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 14:21:07
SHORT DESCRIPTION

*Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per nom. --Cart (talk) 15:33, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Move to keep per comment below. --Cart (talk) 08:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Well spotted Ikan! I feel silly now for not checking it better. This version has the signature in the upper left corner while it is in the lower left corner on the other one. Even if an artwork can be shot in different lights, I doubt it will move the signature. Since they are two different paintings, I think we can keep them both and I've changed my Delist to Keep. Also 'ping' 4nn1l2, who raised the subject on the FPC talk page. --Cart (talk) 08:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I didn't look at the placement of the signatures, but I'm quite familiar with artists doing a sketch or sketchy treatment of a subject and then working on it again as a fully-realized painting. For example, we have at least 4 pastel versions of a composition my father then realized as a very large painting, and every version of the composition is different. I'll vote to Symbol keep vote.svg Keep, too, as this seems like a good enough picture to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Boothsift Is Here 05:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep these are two different paintings of the same motif, similar to what Van Gogh did with his en:Bedroom in Arles. See en:Madonna (Munch painting) for more versions/interpretations. --El Grafo (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep --Claus 09:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I think keep as well. They are indeed two different paintings. Munch did lots of them. --Peulle (talk) 09:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination OK, neither did I know nor spot it. Thanks for correction. (Still the quality is not very good, but that's not sufficient for removal, I guess) --A.Savin 15:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Woolsey Fire - tree ridge in flames 20181119-PB-008.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 11:55:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tree ridge in flames during the 2018 Woolsey Fire, California, US.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fire
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Peter Buschmann, United States Forest Service, USDA - uploaded, some additional editing and nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 11:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking photo of a terrible event. Some parts are a little noisy, but given the size of the photo and the conditions for shooting it, I think it's ok. Applying noise reduction will only make it blotchy and the 'grain' goes well with the motif. -- Cart (talk) 11:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive and frightening, concerning noise I agree with Cart --Isiwal (talk) 12:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 13:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart. Better a bit noisy than mush. --Aristeas (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Pretty good depiction of Hell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Ikan, you and the photographer had the same thought. Another one of his photos from that fire had the original title "Sunset in Hell". --Cart (talk) 09:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I'm not surprised and wouldn't have thought my reaction was original. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Georges Ernest Boulanger by Atelier Nadar.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 02:05:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Georges Ernest Boulanger

File:Elizabeth Glendower Evans (cropped).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2019 at 02:02:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elizabeth Glendower Evans
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by The Washington Times - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 02:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like that in this profile, some of her character seems to come through. I feel a stoicism, weariness of having to keep fighting, perhaps, but a great strength and determination. I don't remember seeing a portrait of a woman from that period wearing a corduroy blouse or dress, but she is also wearing a kind of hat that was stylish at the time. I think she would have been a very interesting person to have a conversation with, if she could have spared the time in between all of her important work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Salzburg Michaelskirche Deckenfresko-4118.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 22:55:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Дві лелеки на снігу.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 21:59:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Great pose and unique capture but the image quality (especially sharpness) is not quite at the level of many bird FPs nowadays. Cmao20 (talk) 22:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting background which is brighter than and similar in color to the subject. -- King of ♠ 03:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree. The snow background for black and white birds is not working. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Loads of wow, and the background works for me – I have no difficulties to see the birds in front of it. What doesn’t work for me is both heads being out of focus. Pity! --Kreuzschnabel 07:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sharpness, it´s a pity! --Isiwal (talk) 09:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Coconut octopus in shell.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 18:45:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coconut octopus in shell
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by q phia - uploaded - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice catch but the cropped shell at the bottom is an issue --Poco2 20:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Sorry but I can't help but agree with Poco here. It's interesting and would probably be QI if taken by a Commons user, but for that reason it's not FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 22:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Poco -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Perth (AU), Elizabeth Quay Bridge -- 2019 -- 0375-9.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 16:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elizabeth Quay Bridge, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

File:Casa en Moñúx, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 47.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 13:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info An unusual shot, but I find enough interest in the shapes and colours here to make it IMO a solid choice for a feature. See what you think. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cool, nice catch, than you for the nom Cmao20! Poco2 20:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Quite nice except the crop at the left, a bit tight -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support --Isiwal (talk) 08:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special and not really sharp. --Hockei (talk) 16:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I can understand that you don't think it's anything special, as wow is subjective and this isn't an obvious case, but I'm not really sure about the idea that it's not sharp. It seems very sharp to me; can you perhaps be specific about where you can see unsharpness? Cmao20 (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Nice house and flowers but not really a "wow" for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei. —kallerna (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ailurus fulgens - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 13:56:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Ailuridae_(Red_Pandas)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Because awww. More seriously, this is a high-resolution shot with excellent quality of an endangered species, and it's far superior to the existing FPs: this one, which is a similar view of the face alone but which has much lower resolution than this shot, and this one which shows the whole animal but is very low-resolution for an FP nowadays. created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking facial expression -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks Cmao20 for the nomination and the laudatio --Llez (talk) 14:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nomination. --Aristeas (talk) 14:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I don't like zoo pictures. They never can outclass wildlife pictures or reach the same status. --Hockei (talk) 17:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Understood; thanks for the review. Personally I don't mind zoo pictures as long as it isn't obvious that this is an unnatural setting, and of course for some less common animals zoos can be the best realistic opportunity to get a high quality image. It is worth noting that both the other FPs of red pandas are also of zoo specimens. Cmao20 (talk) 20:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It doesn't change my sensation. I'll never support zoo pictures in FPC. This has nothing to do with whether I find the quality bad or good. Certainly are zoo pictures of rare animals and plants valuable and maybe important for documentation. But nothing for FPC in my eyes. BTW, I gave no oppose but a neutral. Even if I don't like the background. --Hockei (talk) 16:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:34, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 07:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Heiligenkreuz Kalvarienberg 20191012 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2019 at 06:54:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Calvary Heiligenkreuz

File:Hacienda San Jorge - Los Cancajos 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 21:05:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Park and pool, Hacienda San Jorge, Los Cancajos, Breña Baja, La Palma, Canary Islands
  • @Hockei: That's a bit unfair. You're opposing this not because of the image but you have something against touristy places. --Boothsift Is Here 05:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Interesting point of view while my reasoning outweighs for example "no wow", "nothing special" and so on who are constantly stated and accepted here. --Hockei (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As I already said: It is a manmade landscape --Llez (talk) 10:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Official Portrait.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 19:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is an American politician and activist who serves as the U.S. Representative for New York's 14th congressional district. The district includes the eastern part of the Bronx and portions of north-central Queens in New York City. She is a member of the Democratic Party.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by US House of Representatives - uploaded by Wafflepancake34 - nominated by Persia -- PERSIA♠ 19:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PERSIA♠ 19:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A good portrait of a person very much in the limelight at the moment (time will tell if she actually ends up being an important historical figure in the long term). --Peulle (talk) 08:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The source link now produces a different photo. How should that be handled, and do you think the new photo is better? I'd have to see it blown up to the same size, but on the face of it, I tend to think it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment the old one was made by Franmarie Metzler; U.S. House Office of Photography (according to EXIF), so the assumption of {{PD-USGov}} is reasonable. The new one does not contain any information on author or copyright status, so until that is cleared up I would not recommend uploading it here. --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC) Nevermind: https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/copyright --El Grafo (talk) 09:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not a bad portrait. As far as I can tell with my non-existing experience in portrait photography, it's reasonably well lit (apart from that shadow of the collar), sharp where it needs to be sharp, and her facial expression looks fine as well. I'd probably support this at VI or Wikipedia FP, but for Commons FP I feel a bit under-wowed. I mean, in the end it is just another formal portrait of someone in front of a US flag. We've got hundreds, maybe thousands of these, and I don't see what makes this one so special for it to be considered among the best of the best at Common. It's good, but not awesome. --El Grafo (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree El Grafo Seven Pandas (talk) 14:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per El Grafo --Boothsift Is Here 05:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Apis mellifera - Prunus padus - Keila.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 17:18:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Apis mellifera on Prunus padus

File:Mangart 17.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 16:03:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Mangart Pass seen from the Via Ferrata trail going up to the mountain.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Slovenia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support —kallerna (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice shot. But the shadow on the rock is too dark for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Not too dark for me. Excellent form to my eyes, and I really enjoy the variety of colors and shapes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good dramatic shot to me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do agree with Famberhost --Poco2 20:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A quite common view from a mountain while moderate visibility conditions. Not outstanding for me. --Milseburg (talk) 20:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Famberhorst. Too harsh contrast; it’s a nice scene but not the best lighting of it. Plus I think there’s simply too much within the frame. Concentrate on the winding road on the left, or the arête in center, that might make an impressive FP. --Kreuzschnabel 07:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the comments. I like the complex composition, but do you prefer this (or this)? —kallerna (talk) 07:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great picture (could probably work a bit the contrast, reduced the highlights and increase a tad the shadow), however I'm pretty sure this would be wonderful if printed in large. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I've no problem with the shadow. --Hockei (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 07:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Famberhorst, The strong shadow on the mountain makes it look more like a hole in the middle of the photo than a mountain. --Cart (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Funkturm Arsenal Blitze.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 06:32:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lightning at the radio tower in Arsenal
  • @Kreuzschnabel: Yeah, for that reason, I'm not expecting very good results. I don't know if Linie can fix this--Boothsift Is Here 08:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Boothsift: I just rotated the image (~ 1-2° clockwise), that's why there is not much more to see. Linie29 (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It works for me. --Dinkum (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just the right moment --Michielverbeek (talk) 09:57, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 10:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment would be helpful if @Linie29: updated the file to mention the changes made in Photoshop.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Kreuzschnabel. Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Detail of a pier in Akaroa, Canterbury, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 05:51:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail of a pier in Akaroa, Canterbury, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Other_architectural_elements
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's a detail of the pier in Akaroa. I just like it, I find it quite nice to look at. -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Certainly nice to look at but little wow to me. Mediocre quality, rather uninteresting flat perspective. --Kreuzschnabel 08:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I really enjoy moving my eyes around this. How do you find it if you consider it a composition of lines and forms like a work of abstract flat art? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:43, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ...although I understand the idea it doesn't still wow me Poco2 10:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kreuzschnabel --Fischer.H (talk) 16:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support These are pictures that we see too little here! In my opinion, the quality is excellent.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Famberhorst --Llez (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco.--Ermell (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)}
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poco --Boothsift Is Here 06:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose technically excellent, interesting textures, but not a wow image --Isiwal (talk) 08:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 14:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow and sharpness is not very good, sorry. --Hockei (talk) 17:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:View of Kaikoura Ranges, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 05:52:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Kaikoura Ranges, New Zealand

File:Reading room of the State Library of Massachusetts-9318.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 02:13:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reading room of the State Library of Massachusetts, Boston
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hey Colin, I apologize for not getting back to you earlier. I took the photo as part of the Culture Crawl event during WikiConference North America on Friday. The conference ended today and I honestly didn't have much time taking care of this. I'll fly home from Boston to San Francisco tomorrow and take a closer look. Hopefully, I'll be able to fix the issues that you addressed. Thanks a lot for your feedback, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)--Ermell (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not that wowed--Boothsift Is Here 06:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Boothsift on this one; the wow factor is not there for me. --Peulle (talk) 08:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The wow is subtle but it's there for me; however I oppose because per Colin I'm not convinced by the image quality. There's some odd banded textures here and there, and the image as a whole gives the impression of being slightly unsharp and oversharpened to compensate, if that makes sense. Cmao20 (talk) 14:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin, a pity. --A.Savin 19:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Boothsift. —kallerna (talk) 11:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination After coming back from the conference and taking a closer look, I agree with the opposers. The image quality isn't good enough and the wow factor on the lower end compared to some of my other work. So, I withdraw. Thanks a lot for the feedback. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum-9336.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 02:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tubes at Great Engines Hall, Metropolitan Waterworks Museum (former Chestnut Hill Pumping Station), Boston

File:Close-up view of a bioluminescent beetle Elateroidea.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2019 at 00:27:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bioluminescent beetle Elateroidea
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 11:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:29, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing - Benh (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Definitely not something you see every day! Cmao20 (talk) 14:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noisy, DOF too shallow and it looks at least partially posterized to me. --Hockei (talk) 17:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ebrach Kirche rose window Orgel P4252411efs.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2019 at 23:05:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seufert organ from 1743 in the former abbey church in Ebrach
  • @Poco a poco: This is not a panorama. The picture was taken in high resolution shot (HRS) mode where the sensor moves to catch more pixel. Works only with a trypod.--Ermell (talk) 20:33, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:00, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The image looked a bit odd to me in close up. I had a peek at the EXIF and you have got very high values for colour NR settings, which would tend to reduce detail and create a plastic effect. Compare our existing FP File:Kloster Ebrach BW 5.JPG which despite lower resolution, looks more realistic and natural on the figures and carvings. I've never had to raise Lightroom's standard level of Colour NR in my own photos, only touching Luminance NR when required. -- Colin (talk) 18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Colin: I know the picture, of course. The rosette alone is not that difficult. If you take the organ into the picture it is always too dark because the church only has windows in the upper part. I have summarized three differently exposed pictures using LRenfuse. The smoothing of the edges of the window took some time.--Ermell (talk) 20:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Enfuse isn't the best program for HDR. You might be better off trying Lightroom's own tool (if you have a current version) but the best I have found is PtGui and then taking the 32-bit TIFF back into LR. If you want me to experiment for you, drop me an email with a link to the raw files and I'll send you back a JPG. -- Colin (talk) 07:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Colin. Too strong NR, and weird tones rendering. - Benh (talk) 10:22, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There is some valid criticism of the strong noise reduction above, but it's OK for me given the very high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 17:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 05:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Iglesia Slettebakken, Bergen, Noruega, 2019-09-08, DD 97.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2019 at 06:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Slettebakken church, Bergen, Norway
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the particular Slettebakken Church located in the Slettebakken neighborhood, Årstad borough in the city of Bergen, Hordaland county, Norway. It's part of the Slettebakken parish in the Fana deanery in the Diocese of Bjørgvin. The large, concrete, modern-style church was built in 1970 by the architect Tore Sveram. The church, which seats up to 600 people, was consecrated on 20 December 1970 and has become a landmark in the city due to its unique curved roof line. c/u/n by me, Poco2 06:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 06:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just a QI. The clouds are distracting and the light is very ordinary. -- Colin (talk) 15:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I also think it could be hard to get a really satisfying form out of this building. Some well-placed clouds on the upper left might do it, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO people are being a little harsh on this. It's not my kind of building, but it's certainly architecturally unusual. I'm not really sure how one could produce a more compelling shot of this church; the angle seems good, and the image quality is good as usual. Cmao20 (talk) 14:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Same. Nothing special. - Benh (talk) 16:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others--Boothsift Is Here 05:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Poco2 06:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:North of tehran.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 16:35:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

north of tehran from above of the milad tower
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 16:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 16:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Tehran is a polluted city. in the nature day people go out of the city in nature and number of cars decreases. because that and wind and after 3 days raining I was able to photograph Tehran in its cleanest condition from above milad tower. --Amirpashaei (talk) 06:06, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looks very good to me, but please fix the perspective at the right. --A.Savin 18:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @A.Savin: thanks for your offer. I fixed the perspective. --Amirpashaei (talk) 18:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
      • Fine with me, Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 19:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow and very detailed --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Assuming this is a panorama - how many frames wide and how many frames tall? HDR as well? --GRDN711 (talk) 02:20, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @GRDN711: 11 vertical (portrait) frames with 50mm lens and each frame contain 3 pictures with different levels of exposure. A total of 33 pictures--Amirpashaei (talk) 06:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Some of the cars look funky dude to HDR. —kallerna (talk) 06:29, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Michielverbeek. --Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is a stitching error (indicated on note) and yes some of the cars look very odd. You can get most stitching software to output the individual warped frames and you may be able to use a middle-exposure to fix the cars with Photoshop. It is very detailed though a cloudy/sunny sky is problematic for multi-photo panoramas as the lighting changes. The shadowed/bright areas look nice when you see the whole image, but they are less good when studying the detail -- a consistent lighting would probably be better. Wrt processing, it is very constrasty and some areas quite dark. -- Colin (talk) 15:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @Colin: thanks for your good criticism and suggestions. I will edit tomorrow and will fix the problems.--Amirpashaei (talk) 18:17, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful composition and fascinating to browse at 100% at the same time. - Benh (talk) 10:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info @Colin: I improved the cars and fixed stitching error. please consider the last upload. thanks for your suggestions.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Nationaal Park Dwingelderveld 20-08-2019 (actm.) 10.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 16:10:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info National Park Dwingelderveld is a nature reserve in Drenthe. Pinus sylvestris under threatening clouds in a flowering heather field.
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I liked this on QIC and still like it. Something I didn't think of then is that a crop on the bottom, if done right, could improve the form. Maybe about a finger's width's height from the bottom at full screen would do it. See what you think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Thank you. I mentioned in QIC that this is probably the nicest of this series that I've seen so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pleasant enough countryside, but photographically just a QI. Lacks wow. -- Colin (talk) 15:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I enjoy the colors but per Colin Poco2 09:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Painterly. Cmao20 (talk) 13:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No reason for FP nomination --Fischer.H (talk) 16:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose A textbook example on the rule of thirds :) but not that special in my eyes. Please clone/crop out the twigs on the right edge. --Kreuzschnabel 07:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Twigs removed. Thank you for your attention.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Subdued soothing colors that works well with the bleak landscape. --Cart (talk) 12:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Colin. —kallerna (talk) 11:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Ālī Qāpū in golden time.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 15:34:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ālī Qāpū after sunrise in golden time
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 15:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 15:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 02:35, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Amirpashaei, can you comment a bit more about the processing of this work? 25 frames is a lot of frames. Have you used all of them for the whole frame or only portions of it (sky)? what is the time window between the first and last frame? Poco2 10:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info @Poco a poco: picture merged from 25 pictures. but 5 frames. each frame contain 5 pictures from dark to light for HDR. 5 frames located in the center, top left, top right. bottom left and bottom right. because of using tilt shift lens, there is no perspective problem and you don't need to perspective correction in photoshop. It takes 1-2 minutes to take the first and last photos. The center frame could be missed but I captured it because more sharpness. After 15 minutes I captured ali qapu in blue time. same method. No change in position and camera and lens . https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C4%80l%C4%AB_Q%C4%81p%C5%AB_in_blue_time.jpg for monument of this picture (golden time) I used from second picture (blue time) . because monument in low light had more glory. But the sky light of each photo is its own--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
      • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Poco2 21:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Both photos (golden and blue) are very nice to look at as a whole. In detail the quality suffers towards the edge of the frame, which is quite blurred with strong purple CA. There are also some HDR artefacts where bright areas with perhaps a little movement have created an unreal effect. You might be able to rescue those by using a single middle-exposure frame, or by trying to align the exposures better. I don't know what software you use, but in PtGui it can be best to let it align all the frames rather than picking the option where it thinks multiple exposures are already aligned by using a tripod -- with HDR highlights with fine detail, the slightest movement can wreck the tonemapping algorithm. Compared to the blue photo, I see you have Photoshopped out some metalwork on the roofs and the fountain pipe in the middle of the pond. I think those are permanent features you should retain: we are not just trying to create a lovely picture but also to faithfully capture what it looked like. Our best HDR FPs have handled the light better than this, particularly on the left side which appears quite blown. Is the vignetting natural due to the lens or did you add some in processing? I think perhaps if better processed this might pass at FP due to the lovely light, but at the moment there are too many flaws. -- Colin (talk) 16:05, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @Colin: thanks for your good criticism and suggestions. I will edit tomorrow and will fix the problems. --Amirpashaei (talk) 18:32, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Colin as well --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose regretfully per Colin, for now at least. I also think it would be better with a tighter crop so there was a bit less featureless space. Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I still think it would be better with a tighter crop, but it's good enough for FP now. Cmao20 (talk) 20:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Colin: , I improved the picture as you told. I would be happy to report if there is another problem. Thanks for your nice suggestions colin. --Amirpashaei (talk) 18:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support now. That's a good improvement on the blown areas and HDR issues. Wrt the crop that Cmao20 suggests, it is difficult to crop out the lovely sky with its variation in tone. I think I am fine featuring this crop as people can always made a 3:2 or 16:9 crop from it and upload to a different filename if they want. -- Colin (talk) 18:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak weak support Some strange artifacts at the bottom, a blurred area on the left, and stranges edges (scafolding notably). But otherwise a beautiful composition, and nice colours. - Benh (talk) 10:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @Benh: thanks benh. bottom of picture is pond floor and there is some Scratch even in raw files. --Amirpashaei (talk) 10:39, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

@Uoaei1:, @Boothsift: , @Cmao20: I improved the picture as colin told. I would be happy to report if there is another problem. Thanks--Amirpashaei (talk) 14:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

  • @Benh: you're right benh. in the pond floor I found some noise because HDR processing and I removed them. thanks. --Amirpashaei (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Trappist Beer 2013-08-31.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 15:21:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Drink
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Philip Rowlands - uploaded by Philip Rowlands - nominated by Claus Obana -- Claus 15:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus 15:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately the focus to the Achel is not well done --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support per Michiel - I like the composition, and the focus on the sides, though not pinpoint, is IMO not bad. We use this photo on Wikivoyage's article on alcoholic beverages. I'm surprised it's not a VI. It seems like it should be nominated to VIC in the scope Trappist beers, regardless of the results here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm just not impressed with the quality. There is back focus. "Orval" beer is well in focus, but other are little blurry -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:22, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others --Boothsift Is Here 06:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Good, valuable for illustrative purposes, but the focus is not good enough for FP IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Haeckel Discomedusae 8.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 14:30:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • @Basile Morin: That is true and you can kind of tell just by looking here. However, I don't think it's enough to oppose unless someone convinces me otherwise--Boothsift Is Here 05:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Церковь Параскевы Пятницы - 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2019 at 06:55:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old wooden bridge and church in Leshino
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Mpr89 - nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - That scene and all that decay are very affecting, but Mpr89, you need to clean up a large number of small dust spots. I think that will be challenging. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The quality of this image is not perfect, but the atmosphere and composition are fascinating and get it over the line for me. Cmao20 (talk) 08:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Much better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:47, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes definitely -- one of my WLM'18 top favourites, the scenery has even some "apocalyptic" touch. --A.Savin 10:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Oversharpening --Wilfredor (talk) 14:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The colours look odd...have you used a filter or something? —kallerna (talk) 15:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @Kallerna: I can't comment anything about filters, but if you compare shooting time (after midnight) light conditions with daylight, the colors might look a bit differently. --Ivar (talk) 16:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 17:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The grey sky adds something to the composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'd like to have the moon a bit lower and not to be overexposed. But still solid FP, great atmosphere! --Podzemnik (talk) 23:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I also find the spooky, after-midnight lighting to be alluring but wonder if this image would be stronger if the moon was cropped off at the top. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - For my part, I'd rather the moon not be cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Podzemnik--Ermell (talk) 22:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tight crop at the top, unfortunately we can't decide to put the moon so high or lower, otherwise there's enough sky in the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift Is Here 06:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For the atmosphere alone! - Benh (talk) 10:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Like a Tim Burton movie. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:55, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 12:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia

File:Collegiata dei Santi Nazaro e Celso sagrestia trittico Brescia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2019 at 21:30:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tryptyc by Paolo da Caylina il Vecchio in the Santi Nazaro e Celso church in Brescia.