Commons:Кандидати за квалитетни слики

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 86% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Оди на предлози
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎日本語 • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎svenska
float

Ова се кандидати за квалитетни слики. Имајте во превид дека ова не е исто што и избрани слики. Покрај ова, доколку сакате само да добиете мислење за вашите слики, поставете ги на страницата Фотографски критики.

Цел[edit]

Целта на квалитетните слики е да се даде поддршка на луѓето кои се темелот на Ризницата, поединечните корисници кои ставаат уникатни слики и со тоа ја прошируваат нашава збирка. Додека избраните слики ги истакнуваат апсолутно најдобрите слики на Ризницата, Квалитетните слики имаат за цел да ги поттикнат корисниците да се залагаат да ја обогатат Ризницата со квалитетни слики.
Покрај ова, квалитетните слики треба да бидат и надгледен материјал каде другите корисници ќе можат визуелно да ги видат методите за подобрување на нивните слики.

Напатствија[edit]

Сите предложени слики треба да бидат дело на корисници на Ризницата.

За предлагачите[edit]

Подолу се дадени општи напатствија за Квалитетни слики, а подетални критериуми ќе најдете на страниицата Напатствија за слики.

Услови за страницата на сликата[edit]
  1. Статус на авторски права. Кандидатите за Квалитетни слики мора да се подигнати на Ризницата под соодветна лиценца. Целосен преглед на условите за лиценцирање ќе најдете на COM:CT.
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
  4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the Image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.


Создавач[edit]

Сликите мора да се дело на Викимедијанец за воопшто да се квалификуваат за статусот на квалитетна слика. Ова значи дека слики од места како Flickr немаат право на учество. (Избраните слики не подлежат на ова правило.) Фотографските репродукции на дводимензионални уметнички дела направени од Викимедијанци се дозволени (и треба да се лиценцираат со „PD-old“ според правилата на Ризницата). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Технички услови[edit]

Повеќе за овие кротериуми на Commons:Напатствија за слики.

Resolution[edit]

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media.

This does not apply to vector graphics (SVG).

Квалитет на сликите[edit]

Дигиталните слики знаат да страдаат од разни проблеми кои произгледуваат од правењето на сликата и нејзината обработка, како на пример шум, проблеми со JPEG компресија, недостиг на информации во сенливи или светли делови, или проблеми со доловувањето на боите. Треба да се внимава на сите овие нешта.

Композиција и осветлување[edit]

Распоредот на субјектот во рамките на сликата треба да прдоинесува кон истата. Предметите во преден и заден план не смеат да пречат. осветлувањето и фокусот исто така имаат свој удел во конечниот резултат; субјектот треба да биде остар, јасен и добро осветлен.

Значење[edit]

Нашата главна цел е да поттикнеме придонесување на квалитетни слики на Ризницата, кои се од големо значење за проектите на Викимедија.

Како да номинирате[edit]

Едноставно додајте ред од овој облик на врвот од делот за номинации на страницата Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

File:ИмеНаСликаОвде.jpg|{{/Nomination|1=Многу краток опис  --~~~~ |2=}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the Image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Number of nominations[edit]

Carefully select your best images to nominate. No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.


Проценка на слики[edit]

Секој регистриран корисник може да оценува предлози.
При проценувањето на слики, оценувачот мора да ги има на ум истите напатствија како и предлагачот.

Како да оценувате[edit]

How to update the status

Оценувајте ја секоја слика внимателно. Отворете ја во полна резолуција, и проверете дали ги задоволува критериумите за квалитет.

  • Ако решите да го поддржите предлогот, променете го релевантниот ред од
File:ИмеНаСликаОвде.jpg|{{/Nomination|Многу краток опис --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ИмеНаСликаОвде.jpg|{{/Promotion|Многу краток опис --Потпис на предлагачот |Зошто ви се допадна. --~~~~}}

Со други зборови, сменете го шаблонот од /Nomination на /Promotion и ставете свој потпис, и по можност, краток коментар.

  • Ако решите да ја одбиете номинацијата, променете го релевантниот ред од
File:ИмеНаСликаОвде.jpg|{{/Nomination|Многу краток опис --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ИмеНаСликаОвде.jpg|{{/Decline|Многу краток опис --Потпис на предлагачот|Зошто не ви се допадна. --~~~~}}

Со други зборови, сменете го шаблонот од /Nomination на /Decline и ставете свој потпис, и по можност, да изјавите кој критериум сликата не го задоволува (можете да користите наслови од заглавјата во напатствијата). Ако сликата има многу проблеми, тогаш споменете само 2 до 3 најголеми проблема, или пак додајте multiple problems. Кога одбивате еден предлог морате да објасните причините на страницата за разговор на предлагачот - како правило, бидете фини и охрабрувачки! Во оваа порака треба да понудите поподробно објаснување на причините за вашетоодбивање на сликата.

Напомена: Оценувајте ги прво најстарите слики.


Период на мирување и унапредување[edit]

Доколку нема примедби во рок од 2 дена (точно: 48 часа) по оценувањето, сликата станува унапредена (избрана) или неуспешна, според добиените оценки. Ако имате примедба, само променете го статусот на Discuss и сликата ќе биде преместена во делот наречен Consensual review (Оценка по договор).

Како да донесете одлука[edit]

QICbot автоматски го средува ова 2 дена по донесувањето на одлуката, и избраните слики се складираат во Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted во исчекување на категоризација пред автоматски да се внесат во соодветните страници за Квалитетни слики.

Ако сметате дека сте пронашле исклучително добра слика достојна за статусот Избрана слика, тогаш предложете ја и на Кандидати за избрана слика.

  • Сликите во исчекување на оценување ја означуваат номинацијата со сино.
  • Сликите кои ги оценувачот ги прифатил ја означуваат номинацијата со зелено
  • Сликите кои ги оценувачот ги отфрлил ја означуваат номинацијата со зелено

Неоценети слики (номинација со сино)[edit]

Номинираните (предложените) слики кои не побудиле интерес за нивно оценување (било позитивно или негативно), или договор (еднаков број на негативни оценки колку и позитивни во договорниот процес) треба да се отстранат од страницата по 8 дена, да се архивираат во Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives јули 2015 и на сликата да ѝ се додаде Category:Unassessed QI candidates.

Процес на оценување по договор[edit]

Оценувањето по договор (consensual review) е процес кој се применува во случаи каде горенаведената процедура не е доволна бара повеќе дискусии и мислења.

Како да побарате оценување по договор[edit]

Ако сакате да побарате оценување по договор (consensual review), само променете го текстот /Promotion, /Decline во /Discuss и додајте го вашиот коментар веднаш под оценките. Потоа за еден ден автоматски бот ќе го премести ова во делот за оценување по договор.

Испраќајте слики за оценување по договор само слики кои веќе се поддржани/одбиени. Доколку, како оценувал, не можете да донесете одлука, тогаш додајте го својот коментар, но оставете го кандидатот на оваа страница.

Правила за оценување по договор[edit]

Видете Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Превчитување на страницата: purge this page's cache

Contents

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 02:34, 3 јули 2015 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

July 03, 2015[edit]

July 02, 2015[edit]

July 01, 2015[edit]

June 30, 2015[edit]

June 29, 2015[edit]

June 28, 2015[edit]

June 27, 2015[edit]

June 26, 2015[edit]

June 25, 2015[edit]

June 24, 2015[edit]

June 23, 2015[edit]

June 21, 2015[edit]

June 20, 2015[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File:Σύνοδος Αφροδίτης Δία 2015 9594.jpg[edit]

Σύνοδος Αφροδίτης Δία 2015 9594.jpg

  • Предлог Venus-Jupiter conjunction, 30.7 June 2015. --C messier 10:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry,noisy and shake --Livioandronico2013 17:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment what you mean with shake is just the normal move of stars during a long time exposure (2.5sec). --Hubertl 18:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Jupiter and the satellites are double!?!
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Σπάρτακος 19:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Douple? I can see one Venus, one Jupiter (although, a bit elogated due to the relative movement of the sky - remember Galileo) and three satellites. Also, I can do some more denoising, around the planets. --C messier 10:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
    • I used tripod and 6 s delay to avoid any shake. --C messier 10:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
      • If the subject are the planets you have to use a motor drive, it's like a motorcycle you have to follow --Livioandronico2013 11:33, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
      • But here there is no motion blur. Only a light pathway. --C messier 12:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
        • But discuss it as well? this thing for you is quality? two planets blurred and moved? are you kidding me ???--Livioandronico2013 13:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 12:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 12:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Core_Banks_-_fence_-_02.JPG[edit]

Core Banks - fence - 02.JPG

  • Предлог Sand dune stabilization fence near Long Point Cabins at North Core Banks, North Carolina. By User:Jarekt --Jarekt 13:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks like a random composition. I understand the idea, but I thinkl the achievement is not good enough (Unfortunate crops). The rest (light, sharpness etc... is good. I oppose, but I wish other opinions, I think a discussion could be interesting.--Jebulon 15:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The quality is ok and this is the key criteria. I regard the fence and its wave shaped shadow on a grey sandy background as the main elements of the composition, which I would not qualify as random.--CHK46 16:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think it´s worth to discuss it. --Hubertl 17:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 08:36, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

File:ESC2013_-_Denmark_03.jpg[edit]

ESC2013 - Denmark 03.jpg

  • Предлог Danish singer Emmelie de Forest performs the song "Only Teardrops" in the first dress rehearsal of the first semi final of the Eurovision Song Contest 2013. --abbedabb 19:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It has a watermark --Ezarate 23:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Watermark? Where? However, it's not very sharp. --C messier 11:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 08:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

File:10818 Λιθουανία 4Χ400 γυναικών.JPG[edit]

10818 Λιθουανία 4Χ400 γυναικών.JPG

  • Предлог The Lithuanian team at 4x400 women's relay at 2015 European Team Championships First League. --C messier 16:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Opposesorry,too much noisy --Livioandronico2013 17:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the noise is acceptable here. At least, it needs a discussion, please.--Jebulon 21:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Jebulon Je comprends que cela est votre ami, mais sommes sérieux ...--Livioandronico2013 18:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I don't understand when you try to write in "french", please explain your meaning in another language.--Jebulon 20:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much noise, lack of details --Σπάρτακος 19:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. A bit noisy but a good photo, nice, sharp enough, good colors -- Spurzem 13:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 14:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Lestes elatus female in Kadavoor.jpg[edit]

Lestes elatus female in Kadavoor.jpg

  • Предлог Lestes elatus, female --Jkadavoor 02:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent --Moroder 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but it is not sharp enough and too noisy. For me not QI. --Hockei 14:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei --Σπάρτακος 19:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 14:29, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Двухэтажка.jpg[edit]

Двухэтажка.jpg

  • Предлог Canyon of the Tsitse river in Caucasian Biosphere Reserve, Russia. By User:Synaps-s --Ilya 11:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hubertl 11:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I could agree, but for an easy to take landscape photo, this is much too small resolution imo. --Cccefalon 15:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
    @Cccefalon: higher resolution uploaded --Antanana 21:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
    It is significantly overprocessed. Please have a look at the mountain ridges, for example. --Cccefalon 09:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality, IMHO.--Sergei Kazantsev 08:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unsharp and oversharpened, sadly the higher resolution isn't any better than the previous version --A.Savin 12:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 05:13, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Statue_of_Lion_in_Norcia.jpg[edit]

Statue of Lion in Norcia.jpg

  • Предлог Statue of Lion in Norcia --Livioandronico2013 08:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good quality. , but please clear the clipped parts with the jpg artefacts on the forehead --Hubertl 10:52, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment jpg artefacts Hubertl ? do you mean the holes? --Livioandronico2013 17:19, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No, not the holes, see notes, please! White, high quality marble, especially when polished together with full sunlight is always difficult --Hubertl 19:15, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand...I don't see nothing...boh. Thanks. --Livioandronico2013 19:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)::: I set it to discuss. It´s a good picture, it needs more opinions.--Hubertl 20:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good for me --Σπάρτακος 19:44, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I see what Hubertl means, but it is acceptable for me.--Jebulon 22:29, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 05:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Rathinda amor 07772.JPG[edit]

Rathinda amor 07772.JPG

  • Предлог Rathinda amor closeup --Vengolis 12:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No categories. Unfortunate species crop. --Cccefalon 09:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Categories fixed now. I disagree with "unfortunate crop" argument. This is purely intentional to show head details. Otherwise we end up with full body portraits only where we can capture littile details of the head. And what about head shots and tight face crops of homosapians? --Jkadavoor 02:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment To say it with Sergio Leone: We need more face details. But in cinemascope. I have nothing against a detail shot. But the cropped butterfly occupies only a small part of the upper left of the image. That's the whole truth about "unfortunate crop". --Cccefalon 20:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
    I agree; here the subject is only a small part of the image. We need some intentionally tighten frames too; that's my only argument. Jkadavoor 01:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
    Your example deserves the QI seal of course. --Cccefalon 09:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cccefalon--Σπάρτακος 19:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 05:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Pagoda_Xa_Loi,_Ciudad_Ho_Chi_Minh,_Vietnam,_2013-08-14,_DD_03.JPG[edit]

Pagoda Xa Loi, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 03.JPG

  • Предлог Xa Loi Pagoda, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 19:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, converging vertical lines. --F. Riedelio 10:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If perspective fully corrected, the building would look really distorted, and I doupt if the walls are vertical for real. But feels a bit tilted to the right. Sky could be better. --C messier 15:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Per C messier, if I do that, the image will be just so unrealistic that it wouldn't be acceptable Poco a poco 19:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I have to agree, the sky is a bit overexposed and it looks like the building is falling backwards. --Iifar 15:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 05:17, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

File: Laacher See, Ostufer (2008-12-28).jpg[edit]

Laacher See, Ostufer (2008-12-28).jpg

  • Предлог Laach Lake. It is a volcanic caldera lake in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, about 24 km (15 mi) northwest of Koblenz and 37 km (23 mi) south of Bonn -- Spurzem 18:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice and moodful image. But according to QI criteria I have to deny it: Burnt hightlights and a lot of pure black. Probably a fill flash had compensate the high contrast situation. English description is missing on the file description page. --Tuxyso 18:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK. So unterschiedlich sind die Auffassungen von guten und grottenschlechten Bildern. Außerdem: Seit wann ist eine englische Beschreibung beim Bild vorgeschrieben? -- Spurzem 19:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sie ist nicht vorgeschrieben, nur wenn du dir schon die Mühe machst und das Bild hier auf Englisch beschreibst, ist es im Sinne von Commons als Medienarchiv nur sinnvoll die Beschreibung auch auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite zu integrieren. Ich habe ja geschrieben, dass ich das Bild sehr schön und stimmungsvoll finde, den QI-Kriterien genügt es aber dennoch nicht. Setze einfach auf Discuss, um weitere Meinungen einzuholen. --Tuxyso 18:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for me it´s QI. --Hubertl 02:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:00, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Oruga_de_gusano_de_seda_del_ricino_(Samia_cynthia),_Mariposario_de_Icod_de_los_Vinos,_Tenerife,_España,_2012-12-13,_DD_01.jpg[edit]

Oruga de gusano de seda del ricino (Samia cynthia), Mariposario de Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-13, DD 01.jpg

  • Предлог Caterpillar of Ailanthus silkmoth (Samia cynthia), Butterfly zoo of Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 19:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI enough for me. --Jkadavoor 15:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but there is almost no DOF (why f/2,8 ???), the head is out of focus and there are strong artefacts. --Hockei 17:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry; I overlooked on the artefacts. The shutter speed is already very slow; a higher ISO may required. Jkadavoor 05:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 06:01, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Shiva_temple_at_Puthia_01.JPG[edit]

Shiva temple at Puthia 01.JPG

  • Предлог The Bhubaneshwar Shiva Temple of Puthia is the largest Shiva temple in Bangladesh. It was built in 1823 by Rani Bhubonmoyee Devi. --Tanweer Morshed 18:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 05:58, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: Artefacts in the sky. --Cccefalon 19:09, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Bara_Ahnik_Mandir_at_Puthia.JPG[edit]

Bara Ahnik Mandir at Puthia.JPG

  • Предлог Bara Ahnik Mandir at Puthia, constructed by the Char Ani Rajas of Puthia estate. --Tanweer Morshed 18:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 06:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: Magenta CA in the trees and loss of fine details. Never a QI! --Cccefalon 19:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:03, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Michael_Schumacher_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Michael Schumacher 2010 Malaysia 2nd Free Practice.jpg

  • Предлог Michael_Schumacher_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hi Michael... Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The tight crop is done here on purpose (afterwards and not due to fast driving cars). IMHO a wider crop would be much better here. --Tuxyso 20:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Agree with Tuxyso. It needs lead space/room. --C messier 11:13, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 10:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Nico_Rosberg_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Nico Rosberg 2010 Malaysia 2nd Free Practice.jpg

  • Предлог Nico_Rosberg_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's too tight IMHO, it needs lead room. If the uploader has kept the original it can be easily fixed. --C messier 11:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --Iifar 15:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 10:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Mark_Webber_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Mark Webber 2010 Malaysia 1st Free Practice.jpg

  • Предлог Mark_Webber_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop, the spoiler is barely within frame. Easily fixable if the uploader has kept the original. --C messier 11:20, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --Iifar 15:35, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 10:09, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Fernando_Alonso_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Fernando Alonso 2010 Malaysia 2nd Free Practice.jpg

  • Предлог Fernando_Alonso_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 10:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Rubens_Barrichello_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Rubens Barrichello 2010 Malaysia 1st Free Practice.jpg

  • Предлог Rubens_Barrichello_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? --Cccefalon 17:10, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Tatsächlich dürfte der Zuschnitt ein bisschen weiter gefasst sein. Ansonsten ist es ein ausgezeichneter Mitzieher, und dass das Fahrzeug leicht schräg im Bild ist – vielleicht die Anfahrt einer Kurve? – verstärkt die Dynamik. Für mich Symbol support vote.svg Support. Bitte diskutieren. -- Spurzem 17:17, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 10:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Harbin Music park 2013.jpg[edit]

Harbin Music park 2013.jpg

  • Предлог Main building in Harbin music theme park. by Andrei1230 --Lzy881114 01:12, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Дискусија
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hubertl 01:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I would agree, if the perspective is corrected. From this distance and considering the height of the building, I can expect rectilinear verticals. --Cccefalon 06:00, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --Iifar 15:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Iifar 15:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)--

File:Saint Alexander Nevsky Chapel (Korolyov June 2015).jpg[edit]

Saint Alexander Nevsky Chapel (Korolyov June 2015).jpg

  • Предлог The Memorial Chapel in the name of St. Alexander Nevsky in Korolyov, Moscow Oblast. --Dmitry Ivanov 16:40, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sky a bit oversaturated imo --Moroder 14:32, 17 June 2015 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The photo was taken in the early morning, the sun rose, but was low, the east of the sky was whitish and the west was deep, saturated. It doesn't seems to me that the colour of the sky is unnatural; quite the contrary, I think that I haven’t managed to show the real colour of the sky, it was more saturated. Dmitry Ivanov 19:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC).

  • Поддршка Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Its ok to me. I don't see a problem. I would accept it. Discuss?-- DerFussi 05:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is good from my point of view. --Nino Verde 15:35, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Colours are IMHO OK, but you must apply blur more carefully, because some branches are very blurred and a corner of the chapel. (irrelevant propably) --C messier 11:17, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @C messier: Yes, some unpunctual blur can be noticed on the photo. I will try to fix it in 2-3 days. Dmitry Ivanov 20:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC).
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A new version of the file was uploaded; in the new version an attempt to fix unpunctuality in the blur, noted by C messier, was made. In other respects (colours, contrast etc.) the photo remained unchanged Dmitry Ivanov 19:39, 30 June 2015 (UTC).
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Hubertl 08:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Распоред (ден 8-ми по номинацијата)[edit]

чет 25 јун → пет 03 јул
пет 26 јун → саб 04 јул
саб 27 јун → нед 05 јул
нед 28 јун → пон 06 јул
пон 29 јун → вто 07 јул
вто 30 јун → сре 08 јул
сре 01 јул → чет 09 јул
чет 02 јул → пет 10 јул
пет 03 јул → саб 11 јул