Commons:Кандидати у вибрані зображення

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Кандидати у вибрані зображення на інших мовах:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Shortcut: COM:FPC Якщо ви вважаєте, що знайшли або створили зображення, гідне стати вибраним, - будь ласка, додайте його в нижченаведений розділ кандидати. Якщо протягом 15-ти днів ваша пропозиція буде прийнята спільнотою, то зображенню буде присвоєно звання вибраного. Будь ласка, зверніть увагу: вибрані зображення не мають прямого відношення до Зображень дня (проте вибір зображень дня проводиться переважно з «вибраних зображень»).

Contents

Кандидати[edit]

Для того, щоб проголосувати або додати нове зображення-кандидат, перейдіть за цим посиланням

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Serra Gardunha April 2015-5.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 19:38:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Serra da Gardunha is a mountain range in the centre of Portugal known for its production of cherries ... and sightings of ovnis. This panorama was taken from near the top of the range to southeast, in a a cloudy day and almost contre-jour conditions. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Rahula - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 17:20:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rāhula, the son of Buddha. Tibetan art, 16th century

File:Simone Marinho - Trindade - 2010 05 08.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 16:24:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trindade and Martim Vaz archipelago, Espírito Santo, Brazil.

File:St James's Church Interior 2, Spanish Place, London, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 15:25:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St James's Church, London
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff. Quite a beautiful Roman Catholic local parish church in London, with lots of visual interest in the frame. -- Diliff (talk) 15:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Diliff (talk) 15:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Incredible acutance and wonderfull sharpness. -- Christian Ferrer 17:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Though with the thumbnail sharpening, it's too much local and too little global contrast imo. I get dizzy looking at that. (Not your/the images' fault) — Julian H. 18:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I know what you mean, I thought the same thing looking at the thumbnail. I can try adjusting it but it looks okay at full size IMO. Diliff (talk) 18:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
      • Yes, it looks fine at full size. I think it's actually bad luck that the detail frequency of the photo matches the pixel size here in the thumbnail pretty well so that the sharpening works exceptionally well, i.e. is too strong. — Julian H. 18:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
        • Resizing the thumbnail seems to help. ;-) Hopefully this isn't too big... Maybe we can find a middle ground if so. Diliff (talk) 18:54, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, first looking at the thumbnail, I thought "HDR is overdone". A case where the full size looks better than thumbnail... ;) Yann (talk) 21:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Keble College Chapel Interior 1, Oxford, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 15:18:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Keble College Chapel

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 14:37:33
NYC Public Library Research Room NYC Public Library Research Room

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg, Left[edit]

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Claus 14:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Claus Obana, Diliff: I made the sections and moved your vote. If my decision is wrong, please move your vote or all revert what I did. --Laitche (talk) 16:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006.jpg, Right[edit]

File:William-Adolphe Bouguereau, 1892 - Le Guêpier.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 12:22:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - The Invasion (Le Guêpier) (1892) Translated title: The Wasp's Nest. 1892 Oil on canvas 83 3/4 x 60 inches (213 x 152.5 cm) Private collection Signed and dated lower right

File:Bernini's Dome in Collegiata of San Thomas in Castel Gandolfo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 07:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bernini's Dome in Collegiata of San Thomas in Castel Gandolfo
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- LivioAndronico talk 07:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico talk 07:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor sharpness (and yes, I have examined the picture at 100%). --A.Savin 11:49, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice place, excellent lighting, good management of colors and good symetry. Excellent in thumbnail, disappointing at full size: lack of sharpness, posterization, some parts are too strongly denoised, som parts are too noisy. Please compare with other domes views, you will understand what I mean.--Jebulon (talk) 14:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • No problem Jebulon,I don't complained,how sayd Alchemist-hp :"if the criticism is fair and intelligent and helps to improve is always welcome". If it were easy, there would taste Clin. Thanks for your time.--LivioAndronico talk 14:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. As Jebulon says, it seems too de-noised, but I wouldn't say it's too soft. It seems okay for sharpness, but the contrast edges seem 'gritty', like they have been oversharpened. As others have mentioned, it we could know the details, step-by-step, of how you process you images, then we might be able to help identify the cause of the poor processing that we frequently see in your images Livio. Diliff (talk) 15:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose As I can now personally appreciate, taking an FP-quality image of a dome interior poses challenges. This overcame so many of them. But I see the same noise and processing issues. Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Berlin Hauptbahnhof Ostseite HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 May 2015 at 05:56:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

East facade of Berlin Central Station as seen at early dawn from Alexanderufer.

File:Saint Peter's Basilica at night HD.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 17:48:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Peter's Basilica at night
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- LivioAndronico talk 17:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico talk 17:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A little too much cut from the bottom, but I like. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I find the tight crop (top and especially bottom) simply too disturbing. -- Fotoriety (talk) 00:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Fotoriety. This is almost an excellent photo. The top, okay, the bottom, no. --Abd (talk) 00:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the bottom part isn't excellent. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:12, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The top is not excellent neither, the basilica looks like just a flat rectangle, I miss the dome.--Jebulon (talk) 08:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others: bottom crop issue. --El Grafo (talk) 11:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Webysther 20140125062438 - Balão boituva.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 10:52:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Balloon in Boituva, São Paulo state, Brazil.
@Brateevsky: Пересмотрите ваш голос, пожалуйста. Что значит - "больше Бразилии"? Избранными должны быть изображения, отвечающие требованиям к лучшим изображениям на Викискладе, а не потому только, что для кого-то предпочтительнее иметь как можно больше избранных изображений отдельно взятой страны или города. Если мне как москвичу приятно, когда изображения Москвы становятся избранными, то, по-вашему, это должно означать, что я должен поддерживать каждую такую номинацию потому-де что "больше Москвы"? Вам мало того, что здесь и без того много участников, не способных отличить Викисклад от фликра? Лично у меня такое ощущение, что это был в самом деле единственный аргумент с вашей стороны в поддержку этой номинации, но если я не прав, то объясните, пожалуйста, в чем именно. --A.Savin 17:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
A.Savin, ну, я считаю, что фотография может иметь статус Feature picture. По крайней мере, мне она показалось достаточно качественной и интересной. Поэтому я проголосовал "За", хотя у других людей могут быть другие мнения. Заодно я поддержал участника (и он это оценил, сказав "спасибо" за мой голос с помощью технических средств), чтобы это была не последняя качественная фотография по Бразилии. Да, например, по Европе, думаю, очень много фотографий уже есть. Sorry for writing in Russian, you can use Google-translator. :) The summary is — I vote "yes" for this photo because I think it's quality and interesting. “More Brasil” (from me) can encourage the user make more quality photo form Brasil. --Brateevsky {talk} 18:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose beautiful colors and probably a good QI candidate, but the composition doesn't really convince me and the shadows in the foreground are a bit distracting. --El Grafo (talk)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above. And I don't find the subject "featurable", sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 14:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow. Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per El Grafo. --Laitche (talk) 17:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Nuestra Señora de las Rocas y Monasterio de San Jorge, Perast, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 17.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 09:38:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the islets Sveti Đorđe (left) and Our Lady of the Rocks (right) off the coast of Perast in the Bay of Kotor, Montenegro. Sveti Đorđe (island of Saint George) is a natural island that hosts the Benedictine monastery of Saint George, from the 12th century, and the old graveyard for the old nobility from Perast and further from the whole Bay of Kotor. On the other side, Our Lady of the Rocks is an artificial island created by bulwark of rocks and by sinking old and seized ships loaded with rocks. The homonymous church, a Roman Catholic temple, dates from 1452.

File:Kršlenica 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 07:43:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature Preserve Kršlenica

File:Kršlenica 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 May 2015 at 07:45:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature Preserve Kršlenica

File:Kowloon Panorama by Ryan Cheng 2010.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 12:51:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kowloon Panorama
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ryan Cheng - uploaded by Lkiller123 - nominated by Julien1978 -- Julien1978 (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Julien1978 (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 17:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per this, one of the best banners at Wikivoyage. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too small to see the detail for a panorama.(I presume downscaled to much.) --Laitche (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Plus gray bar on the top. --Laitche (talk) 08:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment there are stitching errors on the right side --93.144.76.191 23:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Gray bar, stitching, low vertical resolution, editing pretty exaggerated. — Julian H. 09:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Julian, also horizon not level, buildings not straight vertically. This isn't "featured Wikivoyage banners". We have some standards. -- Colin (talk) 10:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

*Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 12:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Double vote. Yann (talk) 18:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per other opposes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice lighting but too small. --King of ♠ 01:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Columba livia - 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 12:15:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Columba livia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Rock dove (Columba livia) at Retiro Park, Madrid, Spain. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 12:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kadellar (talk) 12:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 16:37, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 17:16, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support D kuba (talk) 16:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have next to zero experience with wildlife photography and never used a lens that long, so maybe this is a stupid question, but: It seems that at 1/2500 s there would have been some wiggle room to stop down a bit more in order to get a bit more DOF? I mean, you perfectly nailed the focus on the eye, which is amazingly sharp, but the beak is pretty soft even at screen size (1024×1024 px). Not sure how to vote here yet … --El Grafo (talk) 12:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • It is not a question of lack of light. In wildlife photography, when you take a portrait (close up or full body), you want the background to be as blurred as possible, that will usually improve the image. 1/2500 is not strictly needed here, but you'd better use a quick shutter speed with birds, they make really fast small movements that can ruin the image. --Kadellar (talk) 13:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • OK, so it's basically the usual trade-off between foreground depth of field and background blur/bokeh you'll have in an (non-stacked/outdoor-) macro as well (with slightly different secondary factors). If this was a butterfly image I'd probably oppose, but considering the movements you mention that might not be a fair comparison. I guess I'll stay Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral on this one. Thanks for the explanation, though! --El Grafo (talk) 14:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC) PS: The eye section is still fascinating me – may I suggest to drop a crop of the eye into Category:Bird eyes and maybe nominate it at VIC with a scope like Columba livia (eye)?
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Impressive eye and useful image, but the small DoF is too small for to make the image outstanding. -- Christian Ferrer 17:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Baroña. Castro de Baroña. Porto do Son-2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 10:39:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hill fort of Baroña, Pre-Roman Galicia (Spain).

File:NASA Unveils Celestial Fireworks as Official Hubble 25th Anniversary Image.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 09:46:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

NASA Unveils Celestial Fireworks as Official Hubble 25th Anniversary Image

File:Dülmen, Viktorkirmes auf dem Overbergplatz -- 2014 -- 3738 (2).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 09:10:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Light traces of a ferris wheel, Viktorkirmes in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 09:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I really like the nice light pattern coming from the ferris wheel. Also the composition is imho quite pleasing. -- Tuxyso (talk) 09:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nom. Nikhil (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose light ok, but too tight crop and weak sharpness, D kuba (talk) 10:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 10:56, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't mind the top crop but a little mind the bottom crop but agree with Tuxyso. --Laitche (talk) 20:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 06:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks to Tuxyso for nominating the picture. (BTW: I just improved the resolution.) --XRay talk 09:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Sharpness could be better, but given the circumstances it is ok. I like the tight crop which gives the picture intensity and a feeling of actually being there. Nice work. --Pugilist (talk) 15:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Juan Griego sunset from Fortín La Galera.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 May 2015 at 01:45:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juan Griego sunset from Fortín La Galera
This is not another sunset over the sea, this is a zoombie sunset before apocalipse :) --The Photographer (talk) 16:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Bothriechis lateralis CR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 22:00:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bothriechis lateralis

File:StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass GoodShepherd-frame crop.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 10:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jesus image on church window

File:Douglas DC-3 of BOAC at Gibraltar, silhouetted by searchlights on the Rock.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 09:36:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Douglas DC-3 of BOAC at Gibraltar, silhouetted by searchlights on the Rock.jpg

File:Reflexions of a mangrove.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 May 2015 at 00:14:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I don't see an overall idea in the composition. --King of ♠ 00:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per KoH. Daniel Case (talk) 00:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per King of Hearts. --Laitche (talk) 07:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC) Withdraw my vote, neutral for now. --Laitche (talk) 19:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I find the composition very good and very interesting. I really don't understand the critics above. However, on the left side of the picture there's a lot of magenta CA at the tree. I would support the nomination if this issue was fixed. --Code (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    • If that very interesting means reflection and symmetry, I've realized before your comment and guess others are same... --Laitche (talk) 10:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I couldn't shut my mouth called a critic. --Laitche (talk) 10:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support now. --Code (talk) 06:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral This is indeed very interesting with "reality" and reflection seamlessly blending without leaving any discernible water line. Makes my brain go nuts, which is meant in a positive way. I'd compare it to listening to one of the more obscure Zappa songs: complex music and strange lyrics (for a non-native speaker), so I have to listen to them actively and carefully multiple times for them to make sense, but after some time I usually start to like them. Most of those songs are not really danceable or radio-friendly, though, and I fear that this image may lack the FPC equivalents of these words (whatever they are) as well. --El Grafo (talk) 11:51, 24 April 2015 (UTC) I sincerely hope this comment makes sense to anyone but me. If not, it's obviously a side effect of looking at the image for too long ;-)
  • Yes, that's what I meant. --Code (talk) 11:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I like this review, the analogy. If you look up mangrove photographs, 99% will be photographs from the outside looking at the edges of mangroves. Pictures from inside a mangrove are rare, and difficult because of the visual confusion, branches, reflections, light seeping in... The idea of this photograph is precisely that, to show the confusion, the visual confusion. The ripples of the water, the reflections make it hard even there to distinguish objects, until one just sits long enough and let the mangrove in. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good composition, but lacks sharpness and too much darkness. --Tremonist (talk) 12:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 10:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like it very much and it deserve a better exposition which is too bright here IMO. -- Christian Ferrer 17:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Chamaeleo chamaeleon - Common Chameleon - Bukalemun.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 17:42:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:2014 Szczytna, fontanna.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 12:43:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fountain in Szczytna

File:Red Fuji southern wind clear morning.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 09:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South Wind, Clear Sky, by Katsushika Hokusai
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Katsushika Hokusai, uploaded by Petrusbarbygere, nominated by -- Yann (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Famous painting by Katsushika Hokusai, mostly known as the author of The Great Wave off Kanagawa. Renomination. -- Yann (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mile (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality reproduction. --Tremonist (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • {{s}} Razorsharp, notable artist, great work. Kleuske (talk) 12:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Having second thoughts. Kleuske (talk) 16:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I nominated the alternative. This version was published circa 1930 and also the woodblock was made circa 1930. At least Hokusai had never seen this version then I'd like to support the alternative. When the last time I nominated this, I didn't realize that. --Laitche (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 17:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

South Wind, Clear Sky, by Katsushika Hokusai

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This version was published circa 1830 - 1831. --Laitche (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Obviously. Yann (talk) 14:48, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Also good. --Tremonist (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Better colors. Comparing the two versions, i find the above a bit overdone. Kleuske (talk) 12:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too dull. -- Fotoriety (talk) 01:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I couldn't find a better one of the first publication or near first publication, I think 1930 version's detail is distinctly different from the first publication, Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 08:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC) Duplicate- — Julian H. 17:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Please check what you vote on. I don't know if you have written a voting-bot or something like that, but it doesn't work very well. — Julian H. 15:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Stairway Monsanto Castle April 2015-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 08:51:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Granite stairway in the Castle of Monsanto, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment At first view it appears as a zig-zag line rather than stairs, but it's really well-made. Is it possible to increase the stones' sharpness a bit? --Tremonist (talk) 12:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • This is a very high resolution photo, with more than 22Mp. In my opinion the stones of granite are as sharp as they can be. Any further sharpening would cause undesired artifacts. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Love the optical illusion created by those dark and harsh shadows. Well spotted and executed – Chapeau! Sharpness is perfectly fine for me. If you can find the stairs on a map, geocoding would be nice. --El Grafo (talk) 08:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thank you @El Grafo:, it's good to know that some of our peers (one, at least!) perceive things the same way we do! Aussi, c'est bon d'être félicité en français! Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent jeu d'ombres! At low resolution I have the impression that the stones are arranged in the wall and not that they are a stairs outside of this one. -- Christian Ferrer 08:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I suggested a very small crop. Could we have a better file name? --Kadellar (talk) 12:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! --Kadellar (talk) 12:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice subject! Very good! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
    • @Kadellar: & @Slaunger: -- I tried to crop a bit on the top and doesn't work out imo. The bright part in the bottom stair was darkened because it was a bit distracting. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Did I say how much I love you when you submit this kind of pictures ? Smile--Jebulon (talk) 14:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Indeed you did! Thank you Jebulon, I will try to nominate as many minimalist pictures as I can. Even knowing that most editors don't appreciate them much... Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 May 2015 at 06:45:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great panorama with many, many details. --Tremonist (talk) 12:09, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 13:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 00:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice panorama though the colors look faded. --Laitche (talk) 07:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
    • I agree, I think there might be some problems with the processing. There is some inconsistency in the sky. I'm guessing that tone mapping or exposure fusion was used, the dull muddy sky is a common problem with that technique. Diliff (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now, although I could be persuaded to support if reprocessed to fix the issues with the sky. The whole scene looks slightly too dark too. I appreciate that it might have been to preserve highlight detail, but a bit of bumping up shadow and mids might be useful. Diliff (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I am working on it but it is a hard job, please wait a few days. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Uploaded a better version with more light in the dark areas. And the sky is also better now. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Improved. I still think the right side of the sky is a bit dull and not very blue and the transitions between the frames is not great (you can clearly see a difference in brightness), but the left side is improved. Overall, it's just good enough for a support, but if you still have some energy to improve the sky on the right, it would be another step in the right direction. Did you make sure that each frame had the same exposure and the same white balance? It seems like something isn't quite right. Diliff (talk) 21:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's a tiny thing but a stitching error, added an image note. If you'd like to remove that, please do so. --Laitche (talk) 10:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I have uploaded a panorama with less stitching error, but this has moved to another place in the picture but harder to see. Thanks for all the reviews. The panorama is from 7 picture taken on vacation in southern France, and I was not prepared to take panoramas, so the seven picture are taken with f/11 but with different shutter time from 1/320 to 1/160 that leads to problems. And the boats have moved a bit between the shots and that leads to stitching errors. THX all. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Tate Modern, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-11, DD 116-117 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 21:06:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the interior of the building of the Tate Modern, a modern art gallery located in London, England. It is Britain's national gallery of international modern art and the building itself, a former power station, was built in 1947 and 1963. The power station closed in 1981 and instead of demolishing it, the building was reinvented, making out of it an example of adaptive reuse, the process of finding new life in old buildings. The building itself still resembles the 20th century factory in style from the outside and that is reflected on the inside by the taupe walls, steel girders and concrete floors.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the interior of the building of the Tate Modern, a modern art gallery located in London, England. It is Britain's national gallery of international modern art and the building itself, a former power station, was built in 1947 and 1963. The power station closed in 1981 and instead of demolishing it, the building was reinvented, making out of it an example of adaptive reuse, the process of finding new life in old buildings. The building itself still resembles the 20th century factory in style from the outside and that is reflected on the inside by the taupe walls, steel girders and concrete floors. All by me, Poco2 21:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 21:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Great view, but rather dark overall, probably due to the lack of light inside (?) and the dark construction elements. --Tremonist (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    Tremonist: I uploaded a brigther version Poco2 19:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you, it looks much nicer now! --Tremonist (talk) 12:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very well done. The man ascending the stairs seems a bit "ghostly" - but that doesn't matter that much imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A good picture, definitely QI, but not visually striking enough (due in no small part to the asymmetry of the subject) for FP IMO. Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel Case.--Jebulon (talk) 14:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Rissne Metro station September 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 19:59:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rissne metro station.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Rissne metro station, Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 04:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The train is blurred "on purpose", it's greatly done! And on the left wall even the writing is readable. Good work! --Tremonist (talk) 12:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good, but note my suggested crop --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but note my suggested crop, too, it is a bit different --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak Support. Nicely taken, although it's not the most interesting view. Very minimalist, not a lot of visual interest. Diliff (talk) 09:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition and the overall "crispness" of how you captured this specific moment. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose We have now a lot of this kind of pictures in our gallery. The bar is getting higher and higher and is one is not the best of the best (Matter of taste), sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 14:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Christian IXs Chapel Dome Interior 2015-03-31-4812.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 19:23:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Neo-Byzantine Dome in Christian IX's Chapel, Roskilde Cathedral


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:A Sky View of Earth From Suomi NPP.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 May 2015 at 18:33:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Sky View of Earth From Suomi NPP

File:Dülmen, Buldern, Eingang zu einem Wohnhaus -- 2015 -- 5388.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2015 at 19:02:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gate of a house (an former grain mill) near Karthaus (Limbergen, Buldern, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany)
  • Already done.--XRay talk 19:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment What does that say in English? (What does the warning sign mean?) --Laitche (talk) 19:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • "Caution - Biting Dog" is the translation of the sign. --XRay talk 19:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I think the composition and technical quality is good and so is the idea of simply framing the subject like this. The background is too busy with too uneven contrast for my taste though. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A QI but not an FP—no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Case --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't find this sufficiently striking for FP, and as Slaunger says the background is too busy, as well. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Colin (talk) 11:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Macaca nigra self-portrait large.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2015 at 15:51:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Self-portrait of a female Celebes crested macaque
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by a female Celebes crested macaque, uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Qian.neewan -- Qian.neewan (talk) 15:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Qian.neewan (talk) 15:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you please add a category above? Yann (talk) 15:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support copyright issue of this picture makes it a featured picture to me, but it is great anyway. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice, but IMO not FP. It's special because it was made by a monkey, but it is only a snapshot. --XRay talk 19:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • It's a stolen image IMO. No matter what the stupid law says. --Donninigeorgia (talk) 19:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This image was discussed extensively by a large number of reviewers at the earlier nomination: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Macaca nigra self-portrait (rotated and cropped).jpg. However, the actual JPG offered here is much larger (11.74MP vs 1.63MP) so I guess a revisit is justified. -- Colin (talk) 19:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality is not so bad seeing the condition how it was taken (good camera or artist monkey? ;oD) And now it is famous. Yann (talk) 22:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 01:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Great selfportrait... Kleuske (talk) 10:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 11:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose There is enough doubt about the copyright status of this image to make featuring it unwise. Voting to promote it to FP status just as the (human) photographer has said in yesterday's edition of Amateur Photographer that he is ‘working to pursue infringers in the UK’ feels too much like an unethical exercise in photographer-baiting. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Michael, this is the wrong place to discuss the copyright status of this picture, which already have been discussed ad nauseam and settled. David Slater is not the photographer (that's the point), and he sent a DMCA notice to the WMF and it was rejected. BTW his arguments are complete bullshit. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
      • See m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Transparency_Report/Requests_for_Content_Alteration_&_Takedown#Monkey_Selfie. -- KTC (talk) 22:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
      • Yann, while I agree the copyright issue has been discussed ad nauseam and settled in the US, the image still strongly divides opinion on the ethics (enshrined in law or otherwise) of treating this image as free. A featured picture is supposed to be one "of the finest on Commons" and if some feel it is not ethical to host/promote such works then their opinion is a valid aspect that judgement of "our finest", even if some disagree. While threats of legal action continue in the UK, it would probably be unwise for any UK-based person to re-use this image [other than "fair use" for commentary, which seems to be 99% of its usage anyway], which surely affects its status as being among our best free works. -- Colin (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
        • Colin, the copyright status has been reviewed by several legal experts, including from WMF and the US government. I don't think there is any doubt that it is in the public domain in the USA and most countries. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
          • I know and I agree it seems pretty settled wrt copyright law. Doesn't mean that the ethics are settled (they clearly aren't, especially outside of Commons) or that the continued threat of legal action in the UK can be completely ignored. These two issues exist, regardless of whether one agrees with them or not. -- Colin (talk) 09:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
          • Yann, I understand that you don't see any ethical problem here. I do. The copyright situation in the UK is by no means as clear as it is in the US, and if it were to be adjudicated by a UK court the decision could go either way. That, and the perception that Commons is featuring the image out of spite is very relevant, in my view. The comment by Daniel Case, below, exemplifies the type of hostile and unpleasant view that I find most regrettable. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:29, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
            • Sorry to say, but talking about ethics here is a big hypocrisy. I am pretty sure than the camera owner, now being known as "the man who helped creating the monkey selfie", is a much better commercial position than being a photographer of an ordinary picture of an ordinary monkey. Beside, we promoted pictures of much worse ethics than this without anyone raising an eyebrow about it. And we will certainly do it again in the future. That's not an issue in itself, Commons being not a project for promoting ethics. I would be happy to discuss this in a RFC about "ethics and Commons", this nomination is not the right place to do it. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just another selfie. Saffron Blaze 22:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't want to be too formal but per XRay plus it was taken accidentally. --Laitche (talk) 22:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support because it's now a picture with historic value in and of itself, it was pretty good to begin with, and David Slater can go stick his long lens where the sun don't shine. Daniel Case (talk) 23:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ... and another case in point as to why I don't contribute images to Wikimedia Commons anymore. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bastial, animal, but not FP. A "snapsot" taken from an animal can't be featured. It is simply a random image, a snapshot. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Who or what created the image is not a criterion for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: sorry, but what will be featured on this absolute and real/true random snapshot??? Can you please explain it me? That was neither wanted nor intended. It is comparable to a game of roulette or lotterie ... a simply chance from an interesting animal! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Nationaal Park Drents-Friese Wold. Locatie Dieverzand. Dode boom, belangrijke voedselbron in evenwichtig biotoop 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2015 at 06:00:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Location Dieverzand. Dead tree, important food source in a balanced ecosystem. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Could you please add a category above? Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Answer: sorry I do not know what you mean. Are the English language is not powerful. --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 14:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The quality and the composition are not outstanding, the blue sky can be seen among the trees ruins the wet-ish atmosphere, Sorry. --Laitche (talk) 16:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition does not work for me; it is too busy for my taste. Lightning is too dark and dull as well. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the idea and the subject, but I'm not fully convinced by the composition - it's quite busy. Just some ideas that came to my head: 1) A lower angle could have enabled you to keep the branches at the top left corner out of the frame. Maybe concentrating on one of the two sections of the dead tree would have helped too. 2) The whole image is quite dark, but not dark enough to make this look like an intentional choice by the photographer (could potentially work very well with this subject). 3) The white balance seems to be a little bit too yellow (you won't have much living green things this time of the year of course, but still …). 4) I've got a suspicion that this subject might work quite well in black & white. --El Grafo (talk) 07:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I am also unconvinced by the composition. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Seems left side trees leaning to the left and right side trees leaning to the right. Is that actually leaning or cause by the distortion with the wide angle lens(18mm)? --Laitche (talk) 12:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Answer: I have automatically corrected lens with lightroom 5.7. Can also manually correct. For your information: it is hilly spot.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Small correction WB and verticals.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Better with the correction. For me, wow is limited, but the quality is very good. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the composition is much better but about the quality(especially the colour range) seems rather difficult with EF-M for this photo, IMO. --Laitche (talk) 22:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Note: in my humble opinion is in early April not much color in a dark forest. It was important for me to bring the decay of dead tree good picture and that life in the vicinity of the tree has benefited. And I succeeded in my opinion. --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Small light correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Useful but I don't see a FP here. The tree branches in the top left break the composition. Image quality is adequate but not outstanding. -- Colin (talk) 11:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 13 03.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2015 at 19:56:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

13 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support No better example of oriel windows on Commons. Daniel Case (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Could you please add a category above? Yann (talk) 10:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    @Yann ✓ Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support My eyes are surprisingly drawn to that picture every time I scroll through the huge FPC page. Simple, but striking picture to me. I don't think the lighting can get better than that for the subject : it emphasizes the textures quite well. - Benh (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Only when I look this at 1280px, a head of statue and a cable at the right side appear, Here. Why? --Laitche (talk) 05:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
    This is the previous version of this photo, I do not know why this is happening, at a resolution of 1280x881 it should be visible the last version. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • hmm, That's a mysterious. Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 19:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me a QI with good lightening. But something is wrong with the proportions. The window on the right extends noticably further in the vertical direction, than the one to the left. I get the impression that the vantage point was not right in the middle but has been atempted postcorrected by a perspective correction. It pretends to be symmetric, but is not quite so. It gives an unbalanced composition IMO.-- Slaunger (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I don't mind the tight crop for this but the lighting is not appropriate for the subject, the left window's shadow is cutting off and the right window's shadow is reaching the left window, that's the reason why this doesn't look excellent, in my opinion. --Laitche (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
    • Plus, I guess this photo was taken by low-angle notwithstanding it's showing just as if taken by level-angle, so I feel it strange. --Laitche (talk) 10:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Slaunger, he explained very well my own feeling.--Jebulon (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Slaunger, Laitche & Jebulon - Capture a photo directly ahead is impossible, because there is a tree. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I know it's impossible but that way(getting strange feeling) doesn't work for me in this case. --Laitche (talk) 17:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
But I don't mind change my vote to neutral. --Laitche (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Abrimaal (talk) 12:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Possibly cropped too much, but good lighting on the details.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good light and arrangement. Looked for distortion mentioned above, but isn't disturbing to me. -- Colin (talk) 11:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Crocodylus acutus aka American crocodyle.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2015 at 03:40:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Webysther 20131026172834 - Rocha com algas e ouriço-do-mar.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2015 at 20:04:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rock with sea urchin, red algae, green and yellow at beach in Espírito Santo, Brazil
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Webysther - uploaded by Webysther - nominated by Webysther -- Webysther (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Webysther (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very beautiful, but unfortunately blurred and the water on the right is overexposed. --King of ♠ 02:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
    @King of Hearts, Webysther: It's fixable? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
    Overexposed is simple to fix, if the data is in raw, give me one day to see this. About blurred i do no, because the long exp. cause this, water move the plants. -- Webysther (talk) 10:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Overexposed fixed. -- Webysther (talk) 10:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    @Webysther: A exposição não ficou boa. O melhor seria que a água à direita voltasse ao normal assim: [1]. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done @ArionEstar: Applied over the raw the fixed, the quality is really better. -- Webysther (talk) 02:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
    Color is better but unsharpness remains. --King of ♠ 04:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharpness is acceptable for a difficult moment for shooting, IMHO. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's kinda good idea but not the wow idea, IMO. --Laitche (talk) 14:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good idea, but has technical problems. --Tremonist (talk) 12:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good for IQ, not the wow idea, IMO. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 13:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me it lacks some interesting focal point that the eye can rest on. The moss is not of sufficient interest in itself to fulfil that role. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Michael Maggs. Composition not working for me either. -- Colin (talk) 11:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Tiradentes escuartejado (Tiradentes supliciado) by Pedro Américo 1893.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2015 at 16:10:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tiradentes quatered, by Pedro Américo.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Tiradentes quartered, by Pedro Américo. Created and uploaded by The Photographer - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:10, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:10, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Webysther (talk) 21:31, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Historically important painting. Fine reproduction. --Pugilist (talk) 08:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Pugilist. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 09:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support weak support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I find this picture more disgusting than anything. -- Fotoriety (talk) 00:22, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special quality wise, and nothing to compensate for that. Yann (talk) 09:19, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This guy in picture die to change the history in Brazil. -- Webysther (talk) 16:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good, but lacks a little sharpness, sorry. --Tremonist (talk) 12:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Terrible scene, just disgusting for me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The poor quality of this image doesn't deserve this guy who is an important person in the history of Brazil. --Laitche (talk) 09:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Low resolution and low quality. Nothing featurable here. -- Colin (talk) 11:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)