Commons:Кандидати у вибрані зображення

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Кандидати у вибрані зображення на інших мовах:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | հայերեն | +/−

Shortcut: COM:FPC Якщо ви вважаєте, що знайшли або створили зображення, гідне стати вибраним, - будь ласка, додайте його в нижченаведений розділ кандидати. Якщо протягом 15-ти днів ваша пропозиція буде прийнята спільнотою, то зображенню буде присвоєно звання вибраного. Будь ласка, зверніть увагу: вибрані зображення не мають прямого відношення до Зображень дня (проте вибір зображень дня проводиться переважно з «вибраних зображень»).

Кандидати[edit]

Для того, щоб проголосувати або додати нове зображення-кандидат, перейдіть за цим посиланням

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Iglesia de San Carlos Borromeo, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 164-166 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 10:12:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Night view of the facade of St. Charles Church (Karlskirche), Vienna, Austria.

File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg official SCOTUS portrait.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 00:06:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Steve Petteway uploaded by Gage - nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 00:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ezarateesteban 00:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Of course I see why you nominated this, with RBG having just passed away, but I think it's not an outstanding portrait in terms of image quality. There is quite a lot of colour noise and a large amount of JPEG artefacting which is a shame for a photo that is not especially large. For me it would be better to wait until emotions have died down a little over this sad event and see if there are better photos of Ms Ginsburg available. Cmao20 (talk) 01:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose RIP RBG, but not a great portrait of her. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Garzweiler surface mine Bucket-wheel excavator 2019 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 19:58:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Arne Müseler - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not sure how I feel about the photo, overall, but I'm definitely feeling like I want a wider crop on the right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Dramatic photo although there is a bit of barrel distortion. Cmao20 (talk) 01:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose The subject is original and the composition good but the quality is clearly below FP level. It's too grainy (visiblem above all in the sky), lacks some sharpness and needs some perspective adjustments to get verticals vertical. I'd change my vote if the issues are successfully addressed Poco a poco (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looks like a top-down view to me. Doesn't make sense to fix the verticals in that case (I got the same remark in this nomination). Looking at the machine at full size, it's really tack sharp. Shot with an Hasselblad at 100 ISO. Apart from a very very little noise in the sky, I really don't see why the quality would be "clearly below FP" -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:26, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Bridge at Makhtesh Ramon (40582).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 16:54:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A bridge on a cliff overlooking the Makhtesh Ramon crater in Israel

File:Squirrel watching over the coast in La Jolla (70350).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 14:41:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Point La Jolla and Boomer Beach watched over by a ground squirrel in La Jolla, California
  • Only because I distracted him. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  22:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support We can see the squirrel's eye, so I think it's OK. Nice idea for a picture. Cmao20 (talk) 01:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 12:48:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Place of pilgrimage above Klausen in the Sarntal Alps. In the background the Dolomites

File:Ceiling of golden Iwan at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

vault of Safavid kiosk in fin garden , iran
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality, good crop, the item presented as it is... FP. Poco a poco (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Basile and Poco. --Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 10:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  14:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support GRDN711 (talk) 04:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Clapham Lodge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 19:26:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Clapham Lodge amid the gentle light of a crisp December afternoon.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:Bobulous - uploaded by User:Bobulous - nominated by Bobulous -- Bobulous (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bobulous (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good composition. --Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A 3/4 backlit shot can often be quite effective, but here the stone wall blocks the composition and casts an undesirable shadow on the foreground pavement. -- King of ♥ 22:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Welcome to FPC (as far as I know, i haven't seen you nominate before). I like the shot but I think it is for me a bit more QI than FP. The subject is IMO not really that outstanding and for a building that isn't that naturally impressive I would only support a photo shot under excellent light or really outstanding composition. I actually like the composition, but I think the light is a little bit less than ideal - per KoH the shadows caused by the backlighting are not that attractive for me. There is also a little bit of blue chromatic aberration in the branches at the top, though this is easily fixable and not the reason for my oppose. Please, keep trying at FPC - this is not too far off the standard. Cmao20 (talk) 00:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
    • @King of Hearts, Cmao20: Thank you for your reviews. The blurring of the branches at the very top of the image is not caused by CA, but by the extreme edge of a shifted lens (a Canon TS-E 24mm mk II, very possibly shifted to the maximum to give a 12mm rise). I don't believe that such loss of resolution can be fixed in post (but I am hoping Canon will soon release a newer model which exhibits this effect less severely). I did wonder if the backlighting would put off some people, but decided to nominate because my eye keeps getting caught by the soft glow of the building face even though it's in shade and competing with areas lit by direct sunlight. If anyone is interested, I could offer an alternative crop which removes most of the road, but I kept it originally because I liked the long shadows made by the gate in the low sun. --Bobulous (talk) 18:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Jacques Cartier 1851-1852.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:55:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jacques Cartier 1851-1852

File:Funeral for a friend.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Black clay folk art from Mexico depicting skeletons. Photo taken from a private collection in San Miguel Allende, Mexico. Arrangement by me. -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Next time you could take two pictures to prevent the DoF problem --Wilfredor (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Copyright of the figurines? It is clearly a derivative work. Renata3 (talk) 01:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 12:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A striking scene and mix of colour amid monochrome, with a beautiful mix of tones. --Bobulous (talk) 19:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Great idea with the multiple leading lines towards the top of the mountain. I do wish, however, that the closest pole on the right didn't intersect the mountain; a little forward (to get past it) or backward (to make it smaller in the frame) would do the trick. -- King of ♥ 22:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Composition and colour work really well for me. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely, great light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 10:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Bobulous and KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Passageway - Funchal 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 12:06:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Passageway, Rua de Santa Maria 62, Funchal
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Other
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love it --Wilfredor (talk) 12:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice pic - finding beauty in decay. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak Support Nice (it reminds me that composition) but underexposed in my view. Even the background is not so bright - Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don't think it's comparable with that composition. The "dark" wall is not an external facade like in the other picture you mention but the back wall of a passage. This windowless passage is very dark. I had to brighten it up a bit, in the original shot the wall was even darker. The background is a narrow inner courtyard, surrounded by high walls with no direct light (and not a large park; it was a sunny day when the picture was taken). --Llez (talk) 01:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Both compositions are comparable. Not the same images, but two centered compositions with round door in the wall, and vegetation behind. (And this is the aspect I like).
  • Now of course I notice the camera is located in a darker room. Still, overall the image is divided into two parts: 1) One very dark foreground 2) One grey background. And just a tiny luminous area at the top of the stairs. 90% of the surface is too dark. You're saying there was no direct light in this narrow courtyard, due to tall walls, and yes, unfortunately that's visible: the exposure is not well set in my view. Sorry but same problem as here before it was fixed. You can increase quite a lot the light of the whole image and create a more appealing appearance -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. I would try Basile’s hint, but I already like the photo as it is. --Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I did my best. But I have put the original raw file online, perhaps someone tries to improve the picture even more, I didn't succeed. --Llez (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Just add +0.6 exposure in Lightroom and that's done IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I tried it, but then is too much noise in the darker part. Could you try it and upload the result in the folder of the link? --Llez (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Sure, ✓ Done You may want to adjust the noise level with the 2nd version (obtained with Topaz DeNoise AI) -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Many thanks, I uploaded the version improved by you --Llez (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice shot but could you denoise the hall in the background a bit? Look at the flowerlike pattern on the wall, it doesn't look good Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done --Llez (talk) 11:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition and good denoising. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de la Asunción de María, Kirchhaslach, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 09:38:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of the church of the Assumption of Mary, Kirchhaslach, Germany.

File:Crocifisso Giovanni Teutonico o Paolo Moerich Duomo di Salò.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 09:22:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cucifix by Giovanni Teutonico now attributed to the German monk Paolo Moerich in the Santa Maria Annunziata church in Salò.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Italy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Utterly beautiful. And something a bit new in the church-interior genre. Cmao20 (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The light makes the sculpture appear very 3-dimensional, beautiful colour contrast between the warm tones of the wood and the bluish background. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very rich scene. It feels like the lens focus is behind the eyes very slightly, but the face is still sharp and even the nearest hand is clear enough when viewed pixel-for-pixel. The main object is nicely framed by the background, which is compelling and is blurred just enough to show detail without stealing the scene, helped by the good contrast in brightness between foreground and background. --Bobulous (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:White and golden graves in a Buddhist cemetery at sunrise in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 00:35:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White and golden graves in a Buddhist cemetery at sunrise in Vang Vieng, Laos
  • Interesting consideration, however, none of these graves are exactly vertical, and the ground itself is curved. At full size, it's visible some are leaning right, and some are leaning left. Rotating will increase the angle of the grave most at the right in the foreground, that is already slightly leaning CW. Currently the walls of the building in the background are vertical. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose The quality is good and the item interesting but the light and compo are not at FP level to me, sorry. Probably golden hour light would work better here, about the compo, I'm not sure, maybe it somehow possible to take the top higher (raising your hand or stepping on something). Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Taken at 5:42am. Woke up at 4:45 am to reach this place before sunrise. Very subtle light IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Westpolderbrêge. 12-08-2020. (actm.) 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 15:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fairly simple composition that's nice, and the warm light that Agnes mentions in the nomination really sells me on this as an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Optimal conditions. --A.Savin 21:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking image -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good light conditions. --Ivar (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It’s always the light ... --Aristeas (talk) 06:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Simple clean composition. Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 21:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Hohenwerfen castle.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 02:36:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Interior view of the Buddhist temple Hounen Jonin Gobyo with red wooden chest and round straw carpets Chion-in Kyoto Japan.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 02:03:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior view of the Buddhist temple Hounen Jonin Gobyo with red wooden chest and round straw carpets Chion-in Kyoto Japan
  • This chest is located exactly at an edge. There's a horizontal beam of a different color below. I cut it to make the composition simpler -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 22:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC)

File:Mexican clay skulls.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 19:16:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. You should mention whether this is in a museum (and if so, which one), a private collection or something you photographed at a shop or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request hate to be that guy, but please provide copyright and authorship information for your subjects. --El Grafo (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Done El Grafo --Wilfredor (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Surely El Grafo meant the copyright of the underlying artwork; see also COM:TOYS. --A.Savin 21:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
    Yes, I'm talking about the skulls here, not about the photo. See COM:DW. Don't know if they're supposed to be art, mass-produced decorative items or toys, but they are certainly not primarily utilitarian and above the threshold of originality. We can only keep them here if they're not subject to copyright for some reason, and in order for this to become FP this needs to be documented properly. --El Grafo (talk) 09:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Ikan Kekek & El Grafo There are unsigned pieces of a private collection in San Miguel Allende. As is almost always the case with Artesanías Mexicanas (Mexican curious) they are reinterpretations of very common cultural icons and I don´t think that they are truly original works. This type of figures can be found in just about any market in Mexico during Day of the Dead celebrations. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Cool. Please add that information to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 16:51:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran
  • Thanks dear Cmao20. I didn't crop the picture. The picture merged from 5 frames (50mp) that form a square with(more 100mp). I tried to capture the ceiling symmetrical but the Chandelier wasn't in the center. I could locate the Chandelier in the center and correct the ceiling Symmetry in the Photoshop, but If I had done that, the circle would cut more than this. I need to 17mm TS-E canon to capture monuments like this.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 17:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crop is poor (exterior circle cropped off), the angle looks randomed (I'd have looked for some symmetry on left/right or top/bottom), there are halos around the grid of the windows at the bottom (which doesn't happen at the top) and both corners at the bottom are pretty blurry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 05:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm reluctant to oppose because the resolution is so high, as usual, but I agree with the criticisms of the crops (and I understand they're not technically crops, but we use that term as a convenient short hand for bits of a circle being omitted). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad positioning, missed center. --Mile (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I said before Mr Mile, I located in the center of monument but the Chandelier wasn't in the center.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 11.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 15:44:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Palais de l'Isle in Annecy, Haute-Savoie, France
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Solid QI but sorry, I think the composition pales in comparison to your other current nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Special architecture, nice viewpoint, pleasant light. A bit shrunk at the left, compared to the right, but overall great image in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Striking scene, but is there any way the building on the left could be sharpened? I may vote against if it can't be. Realistically, that level of unsharpness would probably make the picture less than one of the very best. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose IQ could be better, and weather too. Morning shot maybe. --Mile (talk) 07:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Basile Morin. Meiræ 21:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per pros and cons above. There is FP potential here, but I'm not convinced by the compo. To me the palace buildings shouts for a wide angle shot (getting closer to it). Poco a poco (talk) 10:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Mill on the old bridge in Millau 13.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 15:39:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Watermill on the old bridge in Millau, Aveyron, France

File:PK Hyderabad asv2020-02 img24 Tomb of Mian Ghulam Kalhoro.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 13:13:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tomb of Mian Ghulam Kalhoro

File:Rural Winter Beauty - Flickr - Mark Spearman.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 12:51:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An Ohio farm in winter
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mark Spearman - uploaded by Red panda bot - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dramatic photo with nice colours (are they 100% natural?) My oppose is because of a number of technical flaws - tilted, not that sharp and a bit grainy at full size, also a black border in the bottom right. Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol wtf vote.svg Overprocessed and perspective problem -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks like a painting. But: Halos around the right house, perspective, the yellow thing is disturbing, not sharp enough, grainy... -- -donald- (talk) 05:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 06:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It’s a pity that people so often ruin their photos by overprocessing, probably in order to cover minor technical glitches and to make a nice subject appear “great”. They act like a chef who first burns the food and then, to hide his mistake, pours ketchup over the whole meal ;–). On Flickr you even get applause for this ... --Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:"Capt. Della H. Raney, Army Nurse Corps, who now heads the nursing staff at the station hospital at Camp Beale, CA - NARA - 535942.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 09:16:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Della H. Raney

File:Russischer Bär Euplagia quadripunctaria-20190808-RM-171229.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 08:39:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jersey Tiger (Euplagia quadripunctaria) on the Friesener Warte near Hirschaid in Upper Franconia

File:Emu 1 - Tidbinbilla.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 05:33:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Emu

File:Colorful sky with orange clouds reflecting in the water of a paddy field, at sunset, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 02:33:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Colorful sky with luminous orange and gray clouds reflecting in the water of a paddy field, at sunset

File:North Complex smoke in San Francisco - Bay Bridge partially illuminated, Yerba Buena Island, and Oakland.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 01:58:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Smoke from the North Complex fire settles over San Francisco
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United_States_of_America
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Christopher Michel - uploaded by Mxn - nominated by Shizhao -- shizhao (talk) 01:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- shizhao (talk) 01:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral While San Francisco on Mars is something I hope to see an FP of one day, I don't think this is it. It doesn't feel like a striking example of this important event. I'll let the experts judge if the actual image quality is FP-level though. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose I kind of agree with Kestreltail's criticisms, there is surely a more striking way to show this event, and it is also a bit grainy. Nevertheless I think this could do quite well potentially at VIC - it seems like it might be a good contender for most valued image in the scope of the bridge during the wildfires. Cmao20 (talk) 02:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not the best composition, too much negative space in the center of the image. -- King of ♥ 05:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition; I feel like it should be moved to the right a bit more.--Peulle (talk) 06:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per King, and besides I think the pictures of downtown make the point better. Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 17:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Charlesjsharp I agree with you, but I also think that there is no way to cut this photo since it is a composition that never ends at the bottom --Wilfredor (talk) 02:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles. A bottom crop that ends arbitrarily on the ground would be much preferable. -- King of ♥ 06:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Crop, bottom and right.--Peulle (talk) 06:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support To me the buildings are what dominates the image, and they should ... I really am not bothered by the crop. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Indeed it was ... that's what I get for doing this that late. Changed Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a vibrant scene, but there's no clear main subject, and if the subject is the street itself then the composition doesn't feel like it balances the various pieces. The light grey structure to the left is very much sidelined, and its outline fights with the buildings seen beyond it on both sides. The long building on the right is interesting but not very prominent in the scene, and the same holds for the tall pagoda in the distance beyond it. Additionally, to my eye the image needs to be rotated about two degrees clockwise. --Bobulous (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Fliegenpilz (Amanita muscaria) -20191027-RM-120138.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 17:44:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fly agaric (Amanita muscaria)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Amanitaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info IMO another really nice focus stack. created by Ermell - uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support we do already have several FPs of this species, but this one does stand out. — Rhododendrites talk |  22:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others, but I think a category should be added for the moss or whatever the green plant is that's in front of and below the mushroom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 11:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 05:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not the cleanest, but that makes it work ... I can smell the woodsiness on this one. And the colors look sort of Christmas-y. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 21:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The stem is pretty noisy but it's crispy sharp where it most matters Poco a poco (talk) 10:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Senden, Schloss Senden -- 2020 -- 0486-90.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 16:13:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Senden water castle, Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • I made some vertical adjustments. --XRay talk 04:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I see that you offered now a bit more of image at the bottom, which made it IMHO worse, as now the missing piece is smaller. Sorry, but that spot spoils the nom to me. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poco a poco (talk) 10:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

(Symbol support vote.svg Support Tight crop, yes, but that doesn't ruin this for me. Daniel Case (talk) 01:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:WLE - 2020 - Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido - 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 14:17:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gradas de Soaso, Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido, Aragón, España.
  • I checked the note - it is straight waterline. --Moahim (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
I don't know, I didn't notice of it Ezarateesteban 18:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment These are just cracks in the rock.--Moahim (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK, fair enough. Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • It's a nice scene that's pretty well done, but the light conditions aren't ideal. I wonder if a little post-processing work with the tones could help... — Rhododendrites talk |  22:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I tried to fix these problems. Check the new version.--Moahim (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine for me, maybe WB is slightly too blue and brightness could be raised a little. -- King of ♥ 06:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  14:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too gray to be one of the best waterfall pictures on Commons, I think. I'd like to see this view in better light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Agree, the water, especially, is too gray -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File: Swami Agnivesh (2019).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:58:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swami Agnivesh in 2019
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Swami Agnivesh in 2019. Agnivesh recently died due to multiple organ failure. Created and uploaded by Mydreamsparrow - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 17:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 17:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A sad recent loss, but the quality is not up to FP level, unfortunately. Straight forward portrait that's rather low resolution/sharpness. — Rhododendrites talk |  18:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. Sounds like a great person, though. Please nominate at VIC, as the photo seems best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Rhododendrites.--Peulle (talk) 07:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as creator - Thanks for the nomination Arion. - Mydreamsparrow (talk) 15:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Rhododendrites. He sounds like a tremendous person though, I hadn't heard of him before. Per Ikan would do well at VIC. Cmao20 (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This looks like a great driver's license/ID photo. But that doesn't make it a featurable portrait. Daniel Case (talk) 14:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:2020-07-20-Alversteen-8761.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:42:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Megalith site Alversteen, Fehmarn, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Superbass (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The difference in brightness is very difficult to manage here. The burnt-out lights are disturbing. --Ermell (talk) 07:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks like a QI but lacks that certain something to impress me. --Peulle (talk) 12:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I dissent. The image quality is good and I like the light very much. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the sharpness is good enough, but the harsh light in the background and composition don't quite work for me. I appreciate the idea of balancing the rocks with the tree, but it just feels like the rocks are "facing" left, where there could be more room. — Rhododendrites talk |  22:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course I was hoping for broad support, and of course I think I took the best possible photo under the conditions on site :-) But I am very satisfied with the respectful tone of the critical or rejecting voices. Even if the picture does not become a featured one, I will keep this in good memory. --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose The blown highlights are not very well done. As Ermell says, it's difficult, but a successful trick is to underexpose - not only 1 EV, maybe 4 or 5 EV in that case. Example for comparison. Also mitigated wow factor in my view, but I could have remained neutral if the leaves were not burnt like now -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Nice idea, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technical issues per Ermell, but even without them this is just a picture of rocks balanced on each other in the woods that doesn't wow me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Lengurbill beach 19.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 12:30:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lengurbill beach, Teknaf, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not sure how this nomination will fare here, but I enjoy the peacefulness of the beach with the boat in the middleground and in fact center of the picture frame, half on sand and half on tide, rather than the foreground, with the clouds providing another horizontal above it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The subject is interesting, but the composition boring (too centered) and ligthing and quality are not extraordinary, it's also tilted (see sea horizon) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poco a poco (talk • contribs)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it a lot --Kritzolina (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The quality should be better. The sharpness is low and there are halos around some objects. --XRay talk 16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per XRay, I like the composition though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Would have been better more tightly focused on the boat and the two guys at either end. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:AfricanKingCapek.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 10:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African King

File:California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 06:47:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

California Academy of Sciences

File:Gymnadenia odoratissima - Niitvälja bog.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 05:11:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Short spurred fragrant orchid
  • @PetarM: it's a natural background. This smooth effect comes along with macro photography, if you shoot very close to the small subject. --Ivar (talk) 12:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support The photo could probably have been sharper. But I think it's a nice recording.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support per Poco and Famberhorst. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Poco. The bar for flower images has been set pretty high. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Broad Street Downtown Area in Nevada City, California.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 04:16:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Broad Street in Nevada City, California, on May 31, 2020. The historic buildings along Broad Street in the former mining town of Nevada City are part of the “Nevada City Downtown Historic District”.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United_States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 09:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Charming small-town main street with evergreens. Just oozes atmosphere and a pleasant mood. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me the wow is insufficient, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 07:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition and light. It reminds me a lot of this FP, except while that one is quintessentially English, this is quintessentially Californian. Cmao20 (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as per Cmao20 Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose I have to agree with Peulle Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral A very pleasant scene, but low on wow in my opinion. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I see the idea, but while it makes a QI easily it just doesn't keep it together for FA. First, the light is a little harsh ... I know this may have been the only time of day you could get the buildings lit, but if that's so this is not the picture with taking for FA. Second, unlike the Diliff image that Cmao linked, the regularity of the buildings is not there in enough quantity to overcome all the distractions like the cars and the trees. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The parked cars on the right side serve no compositional purpose and should be cropped out (leaving sufficient space to the right of the moving cars). -- King of ♥ 06:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, per others. --Milseburg (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Schloss Schildau (2019).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2020 at 15:02:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Poland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 15:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 15:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really nice composition for me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry – for me, the cut-off bridge and building on the right spoil the composition so much that I’m tempted to drag the frame by ⅓ with my mouse :) Rather blurry for a static object in best light. No Exif and no geodata. --Kreuzschnabel 17:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Kreuzschnabel, the composition isn't that great. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I would not call it blurry; I have reviewed this photo at QI, and still think that the image quality is OK. However, for a FP, the crop at the right is indeed a weak point. Either we should see more of the bridge, or a bit less, removing the croped building at the right margin entirely. --Aristeas (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Way too much competition for the great angle on the castle—the shadows of the trees, the bridge and its dark shadow, the cut-off branches, the pond and its reflected trees. I'd have shot this from the other side of the brook. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

File:The Institute Winding Tower at Chatterley Whitfield Colliery.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2020 at 10:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Institute Winding Tower at Chatterley Whitfield Colliery, UK
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Other
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Paddyhalfmonkey - uploaded by Paddyhalfmonkey - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice picture. Needs at least one more category: Sunrises. Also, if you'd call this a silhouette (I would), it should have that category. [Categories were added.] -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Image quality not 100% perfect and I wish the silhouette were a bit more complete, rather than having the shadowy outline of rooves in the foreground. But the light is very good and the shape of the tower with the birds is quite special IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 17:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Tree branches off to the right are distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support it makes for a really nice silhouette. Some will surely disagree with me, but I think the branches to the right are distracting enough and trivial enough that you may be able to get away with cloning them out. Sort of on the edge of acceptability IMO. — Rhododendrites talk |  00:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The branches help the composition. Look at the diagonal from them to the birds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:KlimtPanna.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2020 at 07:07:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Virgin
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Groups
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Gustav Klimt - uploaded by Jklamo - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Wouldn't File:KlimtDieJungfrau.jpg be better especially for such a large painting? --StellarHalo (talk) 12:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Did you manage to open it? It keeps crashing my browser and ZoomViewer. I downloaded it on my computer, but it also did not help --Andrei (talk) 12:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
      • No, I could not open it unfortunately. ZoomViewer is not working for me and the error message is always "No response from server iipsrv.fcg" regardless of file and browser. Also, my computer cannot handle that many pixels. --StellarHalo (talk) 12:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
        • So that is why i am nominating this version. I would like people to actually enjoy it, not to have technical difficulties. Also 200 mb is above the Commons standard upload limit, so i can not reupload it again. --Andrei (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
      • My browser gave up, but after downloading to my desktop, I could easily open the huge image with Gwenview (took some seconds but worked). Awesome at 100 percent. Large size should not be a reason to turn (nor vote) a file down (like punishing it for being too good!), just wait for better hardware :) --Kreuzschnabel 17:43, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 03:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

The Virgin
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Groups
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Gustav Klimt - uploaded by Aavindraa - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info this file is 219.66 MB --Andrei (talk) 19:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:45, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question How do you upload files of more than 100 MB? I also tried it, but I didn't succeed --Llez (talk) 14:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
    • This can be done through the upload wizard. For some reason (probably an archaic policy), files uploaded over existing filenames cannot exceed 100MB. As a consequence, new files must be created for anything exceeding 100MB. Aavindraa (talk) 23:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
      • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks for the informaton --Llez (talk) 11:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support An incredible reproduction of an important painting. Cmao20 (talk) 15:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ZoomViewer isn't working for me either (hasn't in a while, either; sometimes the fixes are quick but not this time). So I'll support the large version based on the smaller one. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/People#Groups
The chosen alternative is: File:KlimtDieJungfrau.jpg