Commons:Кандидаты в качественные изображения

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 55% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Перейти к номинациям
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎日本語 • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎svenska
float

Здесь находятся кандидаты на получение статуса качественных изображений. Пожалуйста, учтите, что это не то же самое, что избранные изображения. Кроме того, если вы просто хотите получить отзывы о ваших изображений, можете обратиться в раздел Фотокритика.

Назначение

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users' efforts in providing quality images to Commons.
Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Руководство

Все номинированные изображения должны быть работами участников Викисклада.

Для номинаторов

Ниже приведены общие рекомендации для Качественных изображений, более подробные критерии доступны здесь.

Требования к странице изображения
  1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. Качественные изображения должны иметь содержательное имя файла, быть должным образом категоризироваными, иметь корректное описание на странице файла по крайней мере на одном языке. Крайне желательно (но не обязательно) наличие описания на английском языке.
  4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the Image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.


Автор (создатель)

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Технические требования

Более подробные критерии доступны здесь.

Разрешение

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media.

Это не относится к векторной графике (SVG).

Качество изображения

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Композиция и свет

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Значимость

Наша основная цель заключается в поощрении качественных изображений, переданных Викискаду, ценных для Wikimedia и других проектов.

Как номинировать

Добавьте ниже указанную строку в самый вверх секции Nominations страницы кандидатов в качественные изображения

File:ИмяФайла.jpg|{{/Nomination|Очень короткое описание --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ИмяФайла.jpg|{{/Nomination|Очень короткое описание (by [[User:ИмяУчастника|ИмяУчастника]]) --~~~~ |}}

Примечание: есть специальный Gadget, QInominator, который позволяет делать номинации быстрее. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the Image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Количество номинаций

Тщательно выберите ваши лучшие изображения для выдвижения. Один участник может выдвинуть не более пяти изображений за один день.


Оценки изображений

Любой зарегистрированный пользователь может рассмотреть номинацию.
When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

Как рецензировать

Как обновлять статус

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

  • If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ИмяФайла.jpg|{{/Nomination|Очень короткое описание --~~~~ | }}

to

File:Название_изображения.jpg|{{/Promotion|Краткий комментарий --Подпись_участника|Почему вы за повышение статуса изображения. --~~~~}}

Другими словами, измените шаблон с /Nomination на /Promotion и добавьте вашу подпись, возможно, с некоторым коротким комментарием.

  • If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ИмяФайла.jpg|{{/Nomination|Очень короткое описание --~~~~ | }}

to

File:Название_изображения.jpg|{{/Decline|Краткий комментарий --Подпись_участника|Почему вы против повышение статуса изображения. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator's talk page - as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Примечание: пожалуйста, оценивайте первыми наиболее старые изображения, и, если возможно, для каждого изображения, которое вы номинируете, пожалуйста, посмотрите и оцените хотя бы одно из изображений других пользователей.


Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections in period of 2 days (exactly: 48 hours) from review, the image becomes promoted or fails, according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

Как осуществить решение

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives сентябрь 2015 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Процесс консенсусного обзора

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

Как запросить консенсусный обзор

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page.

Правила консенсусного обзора

Смотрите здесь

Обновление страницы: purge this page's cache


Contents

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 00:00, 5 сентябрь 2015 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

September 4, 2015

September 3, 2015

September 2, 2015

September 1, 2015

August 31, 2015

August 30, 2015

August 29, 2015

August 28, 2015

August 27, 2015

August 26, 2015

August 25, 2015

August 24, 2015

August 23, 2015

August 22, 2015

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review

File:Ceiling in Vatican Museums-Livio.jpg

Ceiling in Vatican Museums-Livio.jpg

  • Nomination Ceinling in Vatican Museums --Livioandronico2013 22:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient description and categorization are a lack of respect of our common QIC guidelines.--Jebulon 19:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • No author ? no date ? No more precise location ?--Jebulon 16:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Location is Vatican Museums,for the rest I don't know. I don't ask every minutes all this informations going around for the museums,can be annoying. Sorry. --Livioandronico2013 21:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 11:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Cows in Caucasus.JPG

Cows in Caucasus.JPG

  • Nomination Cows on a mountain pasture in vicinities of Krasnaya Polyana, Sochi. --Sergei Kazantsev 19:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Sky overexposed --Moroder 06:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: Sky overexposed. Colour handling and sharpening resulted in white alias line around the cow. --Cccefalon 05:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος 16:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 11:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Apollo_del_Belvedere_in_Vatican.jpg

Apollo del Belvedere in Vatican.jpg

  • Nomination Apollo del Belvedere --Livioandronico2013 13:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Excellent point of view and composition for this famous work. But some parts are overexposed IMO, and there is some noise. As an example, please see File:Apollo del belvedere, 01.JPG for comparison and better details. Anyway, I wish a third opinion before promoting.--Jebulon 09:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος 16:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 06:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Dian HP playing the keyboard, 2015-08-22 01.jpg

Dian HP playing the keyboard, 2015-08-22 01.jpg

  • Nomination Indonesian composer Dian HP playing the keyboard Crisco 1492 01:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good enough.--PetarM 07:49, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, I see the same issues than another nominations of the uploader, too much noise reduction with loss of quality and probably ISO noise Ezarate 21:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think this one is ok. Mydreamsparrow 17:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος 16:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 12:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Buchberg - Randen - Panorama.jpg

Buchberg - Randen - Panorama.jpg

  • Nomination Panoramic view of Buchberg and Randen from a field near Stühlingen-Grimmeslhofen --Llez 11:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Small issues, I added some notes. --Iifar 19:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I will correct it this afternoon --Llez 11:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
      • ✓ Done --Llez 13:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good now! --Hubertl 08:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος 16:16, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 08:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Xylocopa violacea 1432.jpg

Xylocopa violacea 1432.jpg

  • Nomination Xylocopa violacea on a lavender flower. --C messier 09:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry,dark and not very clear --Livioandronico2013 10:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
✓ New version, brighter. --C messier 10:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep in mind that the black insect is in shadow. --C messier 10:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The word "shadow" isn't good in QI. Anyway in my opinion isn't QI --Livioandronico2013 12:24, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Not in my hand to make it move to a sunny location. --C messier 12:58, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 07:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Таблица времени (8-й день после номинации)

Пт 28 авг → Сб 05 сен
Сб 29 авг → Вс 06 сен
Вс 30 авг → Пн 07 сен
Пн 31 авг → Вт 08 сен
Вт 01 сен → Ср 09 сен
Ср 02 сен → Чт 10 сен
Чт 03 сен → Пт 11 сен
Пт 04 сен → Сб 12 сен
Сб 05 сен → Вс 13 сен