Commons:Кандидаты в качественные изображения

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 55% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Перейти к номинациям
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎日本語 • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎svenska
float

Здесь находятся кандидаты на получение статуса качественных изображений. Пожалуйста, учтите, что это не то же самое, что избранные изображения. Кроме того, если вы просто хотите получить отзывы о ваших изображений, можете обратиться в раздел Фотокритика.

Назначение[edit]

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users' efforts in providing quality images to Commons.
Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Руководство[edit]

Все номинированные изображения должны быть работами участников Викисклада.

Для номинаторов[edit]

Ниже приведены общие рекомендации для Качественных изображений, более подробные критерии доступны здесь.

Требования к странице изображения[edit]
  1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. Качественные изображения должны иметь содержательное имя файла, быть должным образом категоризироваными, иметь корректное описание на странице файла по крайней мере на одном языке. Крайне желательно (но не обязательно) наличие описания на английском языке.
  4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the Image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.


Автор (создатель)[edit]

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Технические требования[edit]

Более подробные критерии доступны здесь.

Разрешение[edit]

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media.

Это не относится к векторной графике (SVG).

Качество изображения[edit]

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Композиция и свет[edit]

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Значимость[edit]

Наша основная цель заключается в поощрении качественных изображений, переданных Викискаду, ценных для Wikimedia и других проектов.

Как номинировать[edit]

Добавьте ниже указанную строку в самый вверх секции Nominations страницы кандидатов в качественные изображения

File:ИмяФайла.jpg|{{/Nomination|Очень короткое описание --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ИмяФайла.jpg|{{/Nomination|Очень короткое описание (by [[User:ИмяУчастника|ИмяУчастника]]) --~~~~ |}}

Примечание: есть специальный Gadget, QInominator, который позволяет делать номинации быстрее. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the Image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Количество номинаций[edit]

Тщательно выберите ваши лучшие изображения для выдвижения. Один участник может выдвинуть не более пяти изображений за один день.


Оценки изображений[edit]

Любой зарегистрированный пользователь может рассмотреть номинацию.
When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

Как рецензировать[edit]

Как обновлять статус

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

  • If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ИмяФайла.jpg|{{/Nomination|Очень короткое описание --~~~~ | }}

to

File:Название_изображения.jpg|{{/Promotion|Краткий комментарий --Подпись_участника|Почему вы за повышение статуса изображения. --~~~~}}

Другими словами, измените шаблон с /Nomination на /Promotion и добавьте вашу подпись, возможно, с некоторым коротким комментарием.

  • If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
File:ИмяФайла.jpg|{{/Nomination|Очень короткое описание --~~~~ | }}

to

File:Название_изображения.jpg|{{/Decline|Краткий комментарий --Подпись_участника|Почему вы против повышение статуса изображения. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator's talk page - as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Примечание: пожалуйста, оценивайте первыми наиболее старые изображения, и, если возможно, для каждого изображения, которое вы номинируете, пожалуйста, посмотрите и оцените хотя бы одно из изображений других пользователей.


Grace period and promotion[edit]

If there are no objections in period of 2 days (exactly: 48 hours) from review, the image becomes promoted or fails, according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

Как осуществить решение[edit]

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives июнь 2015 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Процесс консенсусного обзора[edit]

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

Как запросить консенсусный обзор[edit]

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page.

Правила консенсусного обзора[edit]

Смотрите здесь

Обновление страницы: purge this page's cache

Contents

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 03:39, 30 июнь 2015 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

June 30, 2015[edit]

June 29, 2015[edit]

June 28, 2015[edit]

June 27, 2015[edit]

June 26, 2015[edit]

June 25, 2015[edit]

June 24, 2015[edit]

June 23, 2015[edit]

June 22, 2015[edit]

June 21, 2015[edit]

June 20, 2015[edit]

June 19, 2015[edit]

June 16, 2015[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File: Laacher See, Ostufer (2008-12-28).jpg[edit]

Laacher See, Ostufer (2008-12-28).jpg

  • Nomination Laach Lake. It is a volcanic caldera lake in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, about 24 km (15 mi) northwest of Koblenz and 37 km (23 mi) south of Bonn -- Spurzem 18:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice and moodful image. But according to QI criteria I have to deny it: Burnt hightlights and a lot of pure black. Probably a fill flash had compensate the high contrast situation. English description is missing on the file description page. --Tuxyso 18:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK. So unterschiedlich sind die Auffassungen von guten und grottenschlechten Bildern. Außerdem: Seit wann ist eine englische Beschreibung beim Bild vorgeschrieben? -- Spurzem 19:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sie ist nicht vorgeschrieben, nur wenn du dir schon die Mühe machst und das Bild hier auf Englisch beschreibst, ist es im Sinne von Commons als Medienarchiv nur sinnvoll die Beschreibung auch auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite zu integrieren. Ich habe ja geschrieben, dass ich das Bild sehr schön und stimmungsvoll finde, den QI-Kriterien genügt es aber dennoch nicht. Setze einfach auf Discuss, um weitere Meinungen einzuholen. --Tuxyso 18:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for me it´s QI. --Hubertl 02:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:00, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Oruga_de_gusano_de_seda_del_ricino_(Samia_cynthia),_Mariposario_de_Icod_de_los_Vinos,_Tenerife,_España,_2012-12-13,_DD_01.jpg[edit]

Oruga de gusano de seda del ricino (Samia cynthia), Mariposario de Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-13, DD 01.jpg

  • Nomination Caterpillar of Ailanthus silkmoth (Samia cynthia), Butterfly zoo of Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --Poco a poco 19:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI enough for me. --Jkadavoor 15:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but there is almost no DOF (why f/2,8 ???), the head is out of focus and there are strong artefacts. --Hockei 17:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry; I overlooked on the artefacts. The shutter speed is already very slow; a higher ISO may required. Jkadavoor 05:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 06:01, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Shiva_temple_at_Puthia_01.JPG[edit]

Shiva temple at Puthia 01.JPG

  • Nomination The Bhubaneshwar Shiva Temple of Puthia is the largest Shiva temple in Bangladesh. It was built in 1823 by Rani Bhubonmoyee Devi. --Tanweer Morshed 18:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 05:58, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: Artefacts in the sky. --Cccefalon 19:09, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Bara_Ahnik_Mandir_at_Puthia.JPG[edit]

Bara Ahnik Mandir at Puthia.JPG

  • Nomination Bara Ahnik Mandir at Puthia, constructed by the Char Ani Rajas of Puthia estate. --Tanweer Morshed 18:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 06:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: Magenta CA in the trees and loss of fine details. Never a QI! --Cccefalon 19:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:03, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Michael_Schumacher_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Michael Schumacher 2010 Malaysia 2nd Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomination Michael_Schumacher_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hi Michael... Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The tight crop is done here on purpose (afterwards and not due to fast driving cars). IMHO a wider crop would be much better here. --Tuxyso 20:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Agree with Tuxyso. It needs lead space/room. --C messier 11:13, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 10:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Nico_Rosberg_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Nico Rosberg 2010 Malaysia 2nd Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomination Nico_Rosberg_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's too tight IMHO, it needs lead room. If the uploader has kept the original it can be easily fixed. --C messier 11:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 10:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Mark_Webber_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Mark Webber 2010 Malaysia 1st Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomination Mark_Webber_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop, the spoiler is barely within frame. Easily fixable if the uploader has kept the original. --C messier 11:20, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 10:09, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Fernando_Alonso_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Fernando Alonso 2010 Malaysia 2nd Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomination Fernando_Alonso_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 10:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Rubens_Barrichello_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Rubens Barrichello 2010 Malaysia 1st Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomination Rubens_Barrichello_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? --Cccefalon 17:10, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Tatsächlich dürfte der Zuschnitt ein bisschen weiter gefasst sein. Ansonsten ist es ein ausgezeichneter Mitzieher, und dass das Fahrzeug leicht schräg im Bild ist – vielleicht die Anfahrt einer Kurve? – verstärkt die Dynamik. Für mich Symbol support vote.svg Support. Bitte diskutieren. -- Spurzem 17:17, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 10:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Harbin Music park 2013.jpg[edit]

Harbin Music park 2013.jpg

  • Nomination Main building in Harbin music theme park. by Andrei1230 --Lzy881114 01:12, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hubertl 01:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I would agree, if the perspective is corrected. From this distance and considering the height of the building, I can expect rectilinear verticals. --Cccefalon 06:00, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 10:12, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Saint Alexander Nevsky Chapel (Korolyov June 2015).jpg[edit]

Saint Alexander Nevsky Chapel (Korolyov June 2015).jpg

  • Nomination The Memorial Chapel in the name of St. Alexander Nevsky in Korolyov, Moscow Oblast. --Dmitry Ivanov 16:40, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sky a bit oversaturated imo --Moroder 14:32, 17 June 2015 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The photo was taken in the early morning, the sun rose, but was low, the east of the sky was whitish and the west was deep, saturated. It doesn't seems to me that the colour of the sky is unnatural; quite the contrary, I think that I haven’t managed to show the real colour of the sky, it was more saturated. Dmitry Ivanov 19:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC).

  • Discussion Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Its ok to me. I don't see a problem. I would accept it. Discuss?-- DerFussi 05:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is good from my point of view. --Nino Verde 15:35, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Colours are IMHO OK, but you must apply blur more carefully, because some branches are very blurred and a corner of the chapel. (irrelevant propably) --C messier 11:17, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @C messier: Yes, some unpunctual blur can be noticed on the photo. I will try to fix it in 2-3 days. Dmitry Ivanov 20:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC).
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 16:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Bengal_-_1.jpg[edit]

Bengal - 1.jpg

  • Nomination female Bengal --Medium69 12:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient quality. not sharp, not fixable IMO --Hubertl 12:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support --Billy69150 16:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad composition: Too much space at the top and not enough space at the bottom. --Code 05:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice cat but others as Code. -- Spurzem 14:45, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Jebulon 10:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 02:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Interior of departure hall at Beijing Capital International Airport.jpg[edit]

Interior of departure hall at Beijing Capital International Airport.jpg

✓ Done I won't have any further opportunities to correct this for a while, sorry. --Daniel Case 05:05, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 21:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distortions to be corrected.--Jebulon 10:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Jebulon 10:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Long view of inside of Beijing Capital International Airport Terminal 3.jpg[edit]

Long view of inside of Beijing Capital International Airport Terminal 3.jpg

  • Nomination Departure hall at Beijing Capital International Airport Terminal 3. --Daniel Case 19:40, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:27, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: chromatic aberrations in the roof windows, easy to fix --Cccefalon 05:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ✓ Done I won't have any further opportunities to correct this for a while, sorry. --Daniel Case 05:05, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 21:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose disturbing distortions, especially at left.--Jebulon 10:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Jebulon 10:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Spinne_Bratental_Ps.jpg[edit]

Spinne Bratental Ps.jpg

  • Thanks for the new info. I know species level can't be always asked, but Araneae was just like saying "spider". --Kadellar 20:20, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think that the species of the spider or of the bee has nothing to do with the quality of the image. It it's enough to read what happens. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 18:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kadellar. @Spurzem: Properly categorisation is a requirement of QIC. The user is categorizing in the top category which is considered to be bad practise. All taxonomic classification trees have for this purpose a sub-category like "Unidentified XXX". --Cccefalon 05:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sp. level identification is not necessary for Arthropoda as it is impossible in many cases without microscopic examination. So such a requirement will force people to make wild guess which simply means false information. But a lowermost possible identification of main subject (either one) is appreciated. We've a lot of experts here; please utilize it before proceeding to FP/QI/VI. (In this case, I made a request at User_talk:Kaldari#File:Spinne_Bratental_Ps.jpg.) Jkadavoor 06:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and avilable info added. Jkadavoor 06:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Jkadavoor: I agree and as I already proposed the "Unidentified .." category complies with the QIC requirements of proper categorization. --Cccefalon 07:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I just look into the details out of subject interest, and it seems from a new contributor through Wiki Loves Earth. I don't know the nominator too. We can help the beginners, and hope they pick the procedures soon. :) Jkadavoor 08:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 02:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Jakarta_Indonesia_National-Monument-01.jpg[edit]

Jakarta Indonesia National-Monument-01.jpg

  • Nomination Jakarta, Indonesia: A group of sport students in Merdeka Square listening to their instructor while relaxing in front of Monas, the National Monumente. --Cccefalon 04:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fustian. QI for me.--Johann Jaritz 05:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for me not a QI, the impression is very dusty, the main object and it's spire is not really sharp --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting info.svg Info Might be you focussed only on the background. The motif here is a group of sport students sitting in front of Monas ... For an image of the monument, I had choosen other settings. --Cccefalon 06:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me -- Spurzem 12:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 06:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 06:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Remains_of_the_temple_in_the_Imperial_Forums.jpg[edit]

Remains of the temple in the Imperial Forums.jpg

  • Nomination Remains of the temple in the Imperial Forums --Livioandronico2013 11:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe the bar below cut? But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 15:53, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overexposed (and a great part of it is burned) sky, maybe you should go back and photograph the temple when it isn't in the shadows. --C messier 16:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support shadows and lights. As in real life.--Hubertl 06:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 06:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Таблица времени (8-й день после номинации)[edit]

Пн 22 июн → Вт 30 июн
Вт 23 июн → Ср 01 июл
Ср 24 июн → Чт 02 июл
Чт 25 июн → Пт 03 июл
Пт 26 июн → Сб 04 июл
Сб 27 июн → Вс 05 июл
Вс 28 июн → Пн 06 июл
Пн 29 июн → Вт 07 июл
Вт 30 июн → Ср 08 июл