Commons:निर्वाचित चित्र उम्मीदवार

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
सीधे वर्तमान उम्मीदवार पर पहुँचें। सीधे वर्तमान उम्मीदवार पर पहुँचें।

निर्वाचित चित्र उम्मीदवार


FPCandiateicon.svg

निर्वाचित चित्र उम्मीदवार वो चित्र (छवियाँ) हैं जिनके कॉमन्स पर सर्वोत्तम चित्रों में से एक होने के लिए समुदाय के लोग मतदान करेंगे। यह सूची उन उम्मीदवारों की है जो निर्वाचित चित्र हो सकते हैं। आज का चित्र निर्वाचित्र चित्रों में से चुनी हुई एक छवि होगी।

निर्वाचित्र चित्रों के पूर्व उम्मीदवारों को यहाँ सूचीबद्ध किया गया है। यहाँ निर्वाचित चित्रों के कालानुक्रमिक सूची भी है: २००४, २००५, २००६, २००७, २००८, २००९, २०१०, २०११, २०१२, और वर्तमान माह

हमारे उत्कृष्ट चित्रों के अन्य अवलोकन के लिए कृपया वार्षिक चित्र चुनाव को देखें।

Contents

आम बातें[edit]

नामांकन[edit]

नामांकन करने वालों के लिए दिशानिर्देश[edit]

दिशा निर्देश यहाँ देखें।

नया नामांकन जोड़ें[edit]

यदि आपको लगता है कि आपने एक महत्वपूर्ण चित्र प्राप्त अथवा निर्मित किया है जो उपयुक्त चित्र विवरण और मुद्राधिकार के साथ है, तब निम्न कार्य करें।

प्रथम चरण: चित्र का नाम निम्न खाने में उपस्थित पाठ के आगे लिखें, उदाहरण के लिए, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:आपके चित्र का नाम.jpg लिखें और "नया नामांकन आरम्भ करें।" बटन पर क्लिक करें।

सभी एकल फाइलें:

पुनः नामांकन के लिए चित्र के नाम 'के बाद केवल /2 लिखें। जैसे:– Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2


Set nominations ONLY

Sets are temporarily disallowed for technical reasons; will reopen soon.

द्वितीय चरण: आप जिस पृष्ठ पर पहुँचे हैं वहाँ के निर्देशों का पालन करें और पृष्ठ को संरक्षित करें।

तृतीय चरण: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list में सबसे उपर आपके द्वारा निर्मित पृष्ठ की कड़ी डालें: यहाँ क्लिक करें और नामांकन सूची में सबसे उपर निम्न पंक्तियाँ लिखें:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:आपके चित्र का नाम.jpg}}

स्वैच्छिक: यदि आप चित्र के निर्माता नहीं हैं तो कृपया {{subst:FPC-notice}} से चित्र निर्माता को सूचित करें।

मतदान[edit]

वो सम्पादक जिनका खाता कम से कम १० दिन पुराना है और ५० सम्पादन कर चुके हैं, अपना मत दे सकते हैं। अपने नामांकन के लिए कोई भी मतदान कर सकता है। अज्ञात (आईपी) मतों की अनुमति नहीं है।

आप निम्न साँचे काम में ले सकते हो:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question),
  • {{Request}} (Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Бескрајност.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2017 at 08:02:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cliff in the Lake Ohrid near the village Trpejca

File:The Devil bargains with God over Job's faith in Duomo (San Gimignano).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2017 at 19:34:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Collegiate Church of Santa Maria Assunta, San Gimignano is a Roman Catholic collegiate church and minor basilica located in San Gimignano, Tuscany, central Italy, situated in the Piazza del Duomo at the town's heart. The church is famous for its fresco cycles which include works by Domenico Ghirlandaio, Benozzo Gozzoli, Taddeo di Bartolo, Lippo Memmi and Bartolo di Fredi. The basilica is located within the UNESCO World Heritage Site of the "Historic Centre of San Gimignano", with its frescos being described by UNESCO as "works of outstanding beauty". All by LivioAndronico (talk) 19:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico (talk) 19:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Qualified support For the darker lower part of the image. But that seemed inevitable. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:12, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Good picture of an important work. The lower left corner looks unsharp, but as Livio explained in a previous nomination of a photo of a fresco in the Collegiata, that's from damage to the work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Hairy dragonfly (Brachytron pratense) male close up.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2017 at 19:34:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hairy dragonfly (Brachytron pratense) male close up.jpg
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No way! They also eat other dragonflies. When you've lived underwater for a couple of years and only emerge and fly around for a few weeks, you better enjoy it. Charles (talk) 21:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Kowloon Byewash Reservoir 201707.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2017 at 10:49:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kowloon Byewash Reservoir after the rain, the reservoir release the water.
  • Category: Commons:Kowloon Byewash Reservoir
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Wpcpey - uploaded by Wpcpey - nominated by Wpcpey -- Wpcpey (talk) 10:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wpcpey (talk) 10:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm on the fence on this one. On the plus side, the motif is lovely and the composition seems well done - this certainly looks like a good VI. It has a certain wow factor. On the other hand, the resolution is not very high; I'd like some more info about the camera since it seems these drones can carry quite good equpiment, why such low resolution? Also, the image does need categorization, that should be fixed.--Peulle (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because 1.92 Megapixel, too small for FP. Yann (talk) 16:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Storhofthi, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 122.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2017 at 13:00:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Icelandic horse grazing near Storhofthi, Suðurland, Iceland.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Icelandic horse grazing near Storhofthi, Suðurland, Iceland. All by me, Poco2 13:00, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 13:00, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Never shoot a cow or a horse while eating... The image is nice and the white horse gives a good contrast but a grazing horse is quite boring. If it was looking at you or would do something interesting, I think this could be a great shot. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Frans Huygelen's Prometheus, rear view.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2017 at 12:52:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info sculpture by Frans Huygelen (1978–1940), rest by El Grafo -- El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK, I'm giving the film thing another try. Better camera, better lens, better weather, finer-grained film and a subject that was purpose-built to be attractive ;-) Bonus points for the first one to find the reference to the year 3000 in the image. --El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Well, you might be referring to this. --cart-Talk 13:40, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:2016.09.09.-09-Anglersee Bruehl--Grosse Heidelibelle-Weibchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2017 at 12:17:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common darter - Sympetrum striolatum, female
The other one is partially better and partially not. It is a male this a female. I didn't know that the guideline says that the typical colouring of a species is a criteria for FP. BTW, the colouring of this female isn't nontypical. --Hockei (talk) 19:06, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Of course you are right about the FP. Sorry. Typical colouring is not a criteria, but mature colouring could be misleading, compared to, say, this QI image of mine. Charles (talk) 19:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Поезд на фоне горы Шатрище. Воронежская область.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2017 at 11:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Корякский, Авачинский, Козельский.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2017 at 11:27:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Козинцев - uploaded by Козинцев - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 11:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JukoFF (talk) 11:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg regretful oppose What's happened here? The subject's great and well captured, EXIF looks fine, yet the image's technical quality leaves much to be desired... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Martin Falbisoner. It's a beautiful motif, but the technical quality is marred by heavy grain.--Peulle (talk) 15:48, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. Grain everywhere ruins this nomination. -- Pofka (talk) 20:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because the poor technical quality as noted in oppose votes Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Daniel Case (talk) 06:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

MS Skarpö[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2017 at 07:30:52 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The old archipelago ferry Skarpö during a very cold winter day on the island Utö in the outer part of Stockholm archipelago. Skarpö is a ice-going ferry and still used in the winter. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 07:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice, especially the one of the ferry leaving. Good set showing all four sides of the ferry pleasantly in two shots. I love that the photos are taken in the winter, we don't get many boat pics from that time of year, showing that life in the archipelago goes on as usual even if it's below freezing. --cart-Talk 08:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:37, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daphne Lantier 19:07, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Tijdelijke pijpleidingbrug over de Tramwei in Broek bij Joure 08.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2017 at 04:19:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects #Temporary pipelines.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Temporary pipe bridge on the Tramwei in Broek at Joure for transportation of diluted with water to the dredging mud depot. Nice tight line play of rusty pipelines contra-fresh spring green.
    created All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- At first I thought this was a Cart photo. ;-) PumpkinSky talk 13:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but no. I find the trees disturbing the motif, the lower part of the scene is in shadow (very little, but still) and it is too centered. To get this, I would have crouched low to get just sky behind the pipes and placed the diagonal pipe in the bottom corner or something like that. --cart-Talk 16:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 19:41, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose We already had some interesting shots of ugly, rusty pipes, however these trees in the background ruins the composition here and makes it quite usual shot for me as well. -- Pofka (talk) 20:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per cart. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Webysther 20160207091237 - Jiboia Boa constrictor constrictor (cropped).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2017 at 19:57:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jiboia Boa constrictor constrictor
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Nomination failed a few days ago. Yann (talk) 09:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
  • @Yann: Are you sure this FPX is ok? The nom did not fail, it was FPD-ed since the nominator had too many noms going on. Anyway this is a new cropped and fixed version of that first photo. --cart-Talk 09:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
    • Well, I don't think the crop changes the quality of the picture. You can remove FPX and replace with with oppose if you support it. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • I will not support it, just want to get the procedure right. I'll let someone else decide. Thanks for clarifying. --cart-Talk 09:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Mikasa VLS300 official beach volleyball.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2017 at 19:18:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mikasa VLS300 official beach volleyball
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Mikasa VLS300 official beach volleyball (CEV 2017). My shot. --Mile (talk) 19:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 19:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not interesting, casual object. I believe only exceptional objects/compositions could be FP in this category. This one has casual object and casual composition. Quality image at best. Sorry. -- Pofka (talk) 20:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Pofka. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Mesocnemis singularis 2016 04 10 1488.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2017 at 11:10:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male savanna riverjack

File:Israel-2013-Makhtesh Ramon 02 (Ibex).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2017 at 08:59:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Urmas Lattikas 2011.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2017 at 08:51:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Arno Mikkor - uploaded by Kruusamägi - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:51, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:51, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Right two thirds is over exposed. Lack of detail on the piano top and front of shirt. Piano keys not sharp. PumpkinSky talk 10:29, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per PumpkinSky. Daphne Lantier 19:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per PumpskinSky, great look from subject and pose done in by right two-thirds of image. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral This is a portrait focusing on the face, everything else is just background and unimportant. The short DoF is intentional, I don't think a professional photographer like Arno Mikkor would just accidentally chose that aperture. The white on white objects are a more interesting way to frame the subject (also giving us a hint of what he does) instead of just having a white background, so it doesn't bother me that they are very bright. Looking at the histogram, very little of the photo is actually blown, white well-kept pianos are very white. If only the face had been better lit, I would have supported this. --cart-Talk 08:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I can't agree the comments made by the PumpkinSky the slightest. Piano isn't over-exposed and this is a image of a composer and a pianist (and not an image of a piano - that is just a background). Image has to show us the face of that man and so it does. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Even if we all agree to your point, the right side of the face is over exposed; which is the main subject. The two sides of his face being so differently exposed is highly distracting to me. PumpkinSky talk 11:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
      • In my opinion the face is also ok. I never nominated this image myself as I don't personally consider it to be that outstanding, but anyway... it was the comment that got me writing. Face could be more evenly lit indeed, but that isn't overexposed. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because as per above arguments. Yann (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Ncisles Val Mont dal Ega Gherdeina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2017 at 08:44:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Pastura de Ncisles pasture and the Mont dal Ega valley in the Puez-Geisler Nature Park, Dolomites UNESCO World Heritage Site

File:Belle Tout lighthouse March 2017.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2017 at 08:28:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Maria Saal Collegiatsstift Karner und Pfarrkirche Mariae Himmelfahrt SO-Ansicht 30062017 0005.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2017 at 07:16:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Charnel house and pilgrimage church Assumption of Mary, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria

File:Baños de Vakil, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 36-38 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2017 at 13:08:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the Vakil Bath, an old public bath with the status of national monument built around 1769 in Shiraz, Iran.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the Vakil Bath, an old public bath with the status of national monument built around 1769 in Shiraz, Iran. It was a part of the royal district constructed during Karim Khan Zand's reign, which also includes Arg of Karim Khan, Vakil Bazaar, Vakil Mosque and many administrative buildings. All by me, Poco2 13:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 13:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Definitely. At first I thought the people are real )) --A.Savin 15:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daphne Lantier 18:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High quality.--Ermell (talk) 21:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High quality. PumpkinSky talk 02:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High quality. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 03:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:42, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:45, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There's quite a purple tint to the scene. Is there really a purple light? Or is this a white-balance issue? I appreciate the room is lit by various sources that have their own qualities. Possibly global-white-balance can't be set and needs blended for different parts of the room? Btw, is there any copyright issue with the models/set? -- Colin (talk) 08:41, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
    Colin: not sure about the tint as the areas where the models are located look good. I can though play around with the WB Monday evening and upload a new version if it looks right. Regarding your question whether those models could be a copyright concern, I cannot say, never thought about that to be honest. In Iran there is no FOP but is a reproduction of such scenes 1) subject to copyright? and 2) as it reproduces a common scene would it generate new copyrights?. I just know that it is going to be impossible to figure out who created that setting and how old is it (btw. if those models -or similars- have been there for 30 years and as it is a public property it would apply public domain according to Article 16 independently of date of death of the autor). Poco2 17:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • The figures in the middle seem to have a green cast but elsewhere the tint is purple. I would think the scene isn't old enough to be out-of-copyright if there is any copyright to begin with. But you'd need to ask our experts. -- Colin (talk) 18:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • I thing a strong argument could be made that the models are COM:DM. They're unavoidable in photographing this large space and the focus is clearly on the columns and ceiling decorations along with the pool and walkway. Daphne Lantier 01:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose tinted, HDR ? --Mile (talk) 18:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Even if there might be slight imperfections, as discussed above, this is of high educational value in addition to being beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Webysther 20170619072151 - Pedra do baú e a direita Vale do Paiol Grande.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2017 at 03:22:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rock/Pedra do Baú

File:Webysther 20150906183737 - Rio São Francisco, Xique-xique - Bahia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2017 at 02:58:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

(River) Rio São Francisco
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment from the FP guidelines "almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,". Charles (talk) 20:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Further comment: My test is, does this make me feel like I've never seen a sunset before? No. Daniel Case (talk) 06:43, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This isn't most sunsets. PumpkinSky talk 22:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is pretty but to me this is just another sunset and I also I think the photo could have been much better processed, the mid-tones are much darker than they need to be (example 1 & 2). I bet this scene looked much more nuanced IRL and the photo should strive to recreate that. --cart-Talk 08:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. It's nice, but there are lots of nice sunsets on Commons. For this one to be special, it needs to have something more. --Peulle (talk) 16:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. Just a picture of a pleasant sunset is not enough to be FP. -- Pofka (talk) 20:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Umeda Sky Building, Osaka, November 2016 -01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2017 at 20:32:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Umeda Sky Building, designed by Hiroshi Hara and completed in 1993, is the nineteenth-tallest building in Osaka Prefecture, Japan,

Image:Junge Kohlmeise (Parus major) kurz nach dem Verlassen des Nistkastens.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2017 at 15:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Junge Kohlmeise Parus major
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by W. Pfahler - uploaded by W. Pfahler - nominated by Naturbild -- W. Pfahler (talk) 15:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- W. Pfahler (talk) 15:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support HalfGig talk 00:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - The top and bottom crops could be more generous, but I like the bird and the composition, otherwise, and it's especially nice to see its talons curled around the branch. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very tight crop and a not very charming illumination.--Ermell (talk) 07:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunate pose, crop too tight, blown highlights, very noisy background. Charles (talk) 08:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per other opposers. --Cayambe (talk) 12:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per the stick in front of the bird. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Tight crop and very unfavorable light. --cart-Talk 12:00, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. -- Pofka (talk) 20:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Piéride du réséda ( Pontia daplidice) au Lac sud de Tunis.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2017 at 12:18:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pontia daplidice (Bath white)

File:Kopenhagen (DK), Nationalmuseum -- 2017 -- 1473-9.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2017 at 10:35:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arcades at Nationalmuseet, Kopenhagen, Denmark
  • May be we have different opinions. ;-) IMO the clouds are like a cream hood. They show, it is natural. --XRay talk 16:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Zebra 2013 10 06 1274.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2017 at 05:39:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Zebras drinking

File:Aleksander Uurits. Portrait of a Lady. TKM 0088M.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2017 at 00:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aleksander Uurits. "Portrait of a Lady"

File:Heath fritillary (Melitaea athalia lachares).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2017 at 22:07:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Heath fritillary (Melitaea athalia lachares) from Estonia
another revenge vote from George. Charles (talk) 09:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Please, don't take offense. There is no "revenge" anyway. You can see my support votes of Your nominations here and here and here and more. Very friendly, -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
My apologies, George. I'm too touchy today! Charles (talk) 21:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
All OK now, have a good day! Face-smile.svg -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question @El Golli Mohamed: I hope this isn't a revenge vote because of Charles rejection of your picture, is it? Namely the sharpness here is much better! --Hockei (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm not quite convinced of the composition. --Hockei (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sharpness should be better for FP. Plus the lighting looks a bit unnatural. -- Pofka (talk) 20:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Turbo sarmaticus 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2017 at 21:00:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South African Turban

File:Kopenhagen (DK), Peblinge-See, Søpavillonen -- 2017 -- 1453.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2017 at 15:07:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peblinge Sø with Søpavillonen in Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Denmark
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 15:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 15:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daphne Lantier 16:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PumpkinSky talk 22:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A nice image with colours and the reflections give a suitable wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 22:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Isn't there a better viewpoint to eliminate the horrible building on the right? Charles (talk) 22:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, but the "white" of the building is too bright (burned out) and unsharp for me, otherwise very nice. Can you try please to rework this image from the raw? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Fixed @Alchemist-hp: Thank you for your hint. I just made some improvements in the white areas. --XRay talk 05:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Morning in Langtang.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2017 at 09:48:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A view of Langtang National Park from Laurebina-La Pass
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Q-lieb-in - uploaded by Q-lieb-in - nominated by Biplab Anand -- Biplab Anand (Talk) 09:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Biplab Anand (Talk) 09:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very nice composition and colors. Please add geo location and upload a better resolution. --XRay talk 15:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, although it would be nice to see a slightly larger version. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Stunning image - but then I am a sucker for repeated mountain ridges! For me the pixel number is not an issue, but I would love to fly to the spot on Google Maps - geo location would definitely add to the value of the image. --Alandmanson (talk) 07:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose At only 3.7MP, 40% linear resolution compared to 24MP camera, this is too small imo for a landscape FP in 2017. Please upload a full size image for FP. -- Colin (talk) 11:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alandmanson (talk) 09:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 09:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:21, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

File:2016.07.12.-11-Flemhuder See Quarnbek--Blaugruene Mosaikjungfer-Weibchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2017 at 05:28:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Southern hawker - Aeshna cyanea, female.

File:Araçari-poca.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2017 at 00:37:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Jairmoreirafotografia - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:37, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:37, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak support technically not perfect but impressive enough --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support Quality of the bird is doubtful, but probably could fit minimum requirements. -- Pofka (talk) 11:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Background is working at cross-purposes to the bird. Daniel Case (talk) 14:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak support per Martin -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's too dark at the moment and the bits of tree, as Daniel says, are off-putting. Charles (talk) 22:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment What about categorization, location, things like that?--Peulle (talk) 22:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per Daniel. Daphne Lantier 18:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but lack of categories should be fixed. Tomer T (talk) 09:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Category fixed. --Cayambe (talk) 16:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Mouette rieuse en vol au lac sud de Tunis.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2017 at 22:24:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chroicocephalus ridibundus ( Black-headed Gull )

File:Harebells by a road.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2017 at 21:13:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Harebells by a road
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A "star" harebell with its "chorus line". Last attempt with a more innovative way of photographing plants, after this I'll go back to the old "safe" style. All by me, --cart-Talk 21:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- cart-Talk 21:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'd go back to the old "safe" style! Composition/background doesn't work. Charles (talk) 22:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per Charles. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Background issue. -- Pofka (talk) 20:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -09.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2017 at 14:43:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thudufushi, a vacation resort

File:Opgebaggerd hout (Langweerderwielen) 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2017 at 04:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

The wood on this image has been under water for years. It has been removed from the lake during dredging operations. created All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A more selective crop (see note) might work better here and B&W is not doing this documentation photo any favors. With color, the waterlogged logs might have contrasted well with the green(?) grass and plants and giving the viewer a clue as to what this is. In B&W it looks to much like ordinary burnt firewood. --cart-Talk 09:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Photo cut out. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Question: this picture is better? Opgebaggerd hout (Langweerderwielen) 02.jpg --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • It's better, but the plants were not as interesting as I hoped for. I think that for such an image to work, you need some extraordinary feature in the wood, dramatic light or something beside the log that is beautiful, creating a contrast. Sort of like this log. --cart-Talk 20:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per cart. Daniel Case (talk) 15:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose why B&W??? Boring. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO a good idea to use black-and-white to improve the structures. --XRay talk 15:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Lucanus cervus male 2017 G1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2017 at 16:52:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stag beetle (Lucanus cervus) male

File:Eduard Wiiralt, Põrgu (1932).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2017 at 22:30:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eduard Wiiralt, "Hell" (1932)

File:Common kingfisher at Tennōji Park in Osaka, March 2016 II.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2017 at 20:29:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common kingfisher at Tennōji Park in Osaka.
Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:04, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --cart-Talk 07:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)}}
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Not very much definition. The lens I guess is the limitation. Charles (talk) 07:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Benh (talk) 11:30, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Don't understand the voting here compared to this current nomination which has comparable sharpness and size of birds in pixels. Yet the other photo is a great picture and this one is not. The tree trunk is distracting and diagonal intersects the birds head. We already have a better FP: File:Kingfisher eating a tadpole.jpg with no distracting background at all. -- Colin (talk) 17:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree. This cannot compare with existing FP. Charles (talk) 20:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Really sorry but I agree completely with Colin. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Colin Poco2 22:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 23:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin--Ermell (talk) 06:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --El Grafo (talk) 08:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin. It's a pity because the quality is good and the right side of the image is optimal. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question This is the part of FP I'm still unsure of; when images are similar. Should this be a "delist/replace" discussion? We have had several images of the same species of bird promoted before - just how similar do they have to be before they overlap?--Peulle (talk) 16:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment That's been an ongoing debate. People will never agree. In this case, I think they are dissimilar enough for both to be listed. PumpkinSky talk 21:42, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
OK, I guess we'll have to settle it democratically, then. Thanks to Colin for pointing it out and then people can decide for themselves.--Peulle (talk) 22:43, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Not this absolutely isn't a delist/replace issue. People can take pictures of Kingfishers all they like. But FP is about "the finest on Commons" and the other pic is an order of magnitude better, particularly wrt background / composition. -- Colin (talk) 21:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Disputa de galho entre duas fêmeas de Saí-azul - Dacnis cayana.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2017 at 08:59:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dacnis cayana
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Renato Augusto Martins, nominated by Yann (talk) 08:59, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 08:59, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PumpkinSky talk 09:52, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dэя-Бøяg 12:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --cart-Talk 15:21, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another great work of yours Renato! Poco2 16:10, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I cannot find the focus point. You can correct me, but as far as I can see it isn't on the birds. --Hockei (talk) 16:20, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice shot, but out of focus and partly over-exposed. Charles (talk) 17:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 21:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. And we've got supports on less sharp OOF still ceilings, so I'm personally fine when there's slight issues on action shots. - Benh (talk) 11:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support Beautiful but out of focus. Pity. -- Pofka (talk) 11:31, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Benh. Too many votes looking at the pixels and not the picture imo. -- Colin (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Benh although I prefer downsampling(8MP) in this case. --Laitche (talk) 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --El Grafo (talk) 08:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm totally fine with an action shot not being perfect. It's good enought for me as FP. --PierreSelim (talk) 05:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support HalfGig talk 00:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good, excellent! -- Spurzem (talk) 18:52, 21 July 2017 (UTC)