Commons:特色图片评选

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:特色图片候选)
Jump to: navigation, search
Skip to current candidates 跳转至评选区
此处的图片评选区交流主要使用英语,如果需要中文交流区,请前往中文维基百科的本地评选区

特色图片评选


FPCandiateicon.svg

欢迎来到特色图片评选!社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一,即特色图片每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻,也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云:“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像,请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识,图像就会成功入选。

这里列出了特色图片的评选记录,你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片:2004年2005, 2006年2007年2008年2009年2010年2011年2012年2013年2014年2015年2016以及本月

关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述,请参阅我们的年度评选

规范[edit]

  • 投票周期为10天,之后的投票将无效。
  • 欢迎匿名用户提名并参与讨论。
  • 提名者可以随时撤回提名。
  • 每个注册用户都可以投票,匿名用户的票将不统计。
  • 如果提名5天后没有支持票,该提名将提前结束。
  • 通过的标准:至少5个支持票,支持票与反对票比例大于2/1。
  • 完成的投票保存在存档
  • 参见投票结束后操作指引

提名[edit]

如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像,并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可,那么请按照如下步骤操作:

1. 按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg)在下方的文本框输入图像名称,然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。

如果本次提名为第n次提名,请按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg/2)展开操作。


所有的新图片集提名页面都应按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination)进行。



2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。(注:打开编辑页面后,您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表,请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部(在本行后)”;您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士(除了顶部)”。 )

3. 点击此处并按如下格式在图片候选区顶端加入新内容:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg}}

推荐操作:COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。

可选操作:如果您不是图像的创建者,请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”(不含括号)。

注意,你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当![edit]

光暗度[edit]

Shadowtest.jpg

在讨论图像的光暗度的时候,投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示,它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个(甚至四个)圈子,那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子,你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数,故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话,也可以考虑把它打印出来。

色彩度[edit]

Colortest.png

在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图,图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合,你则须要调校你的伽玛设置(在电脑的输出设置上,而不在于屏幕显示),直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难,然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意,在液晶显示(无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕)上观看图片,你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要,请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。

Contents

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Village weaver (Ploceus cucullatus cucullatus) female.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 15:17:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Village weaver (Ploceus cucullatus cucullatus) female

File:Santorin (GR), Fira -- 2017 -- 2598.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 14:23:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Table with chairs in Fira, Santorin, Griechenland

File:Santorin (GR), Exomytis, Marina Exomitis-Vlychada -- 2017 -- 2812.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 14:21:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fishing net in the port of Exomitis, Santorin, Greece

File:Turnau Hochanger Panorama 20171014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 13:14:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Turnau Hochanger Panorama 20171014.jpg
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info 240° panorama from Hochanger mountain (1,682 metres (5,518 ft)) near Turnau, Styria, Austria. ATTENTION: this file is really huge! --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Awesome piece. I was wondering if it was a little overexposed but on second thought I don't think it is. The sharpness is good and the depth is amazing; you can really see everything from birds to bonfires, from ravines to logging tracks. As for the size, well, you know it's a big image when I have to open it on my gaming rig. :) --Peulle (talk) 14:03, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Brilliant technically I'm sure, but it crashed my PC. We need a better way to assess these panoramas. And why so much grass in the foreground? Charles (talk) 15:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Kormoran, poletuvanje, Golem Grad.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 08:22:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cormorant during take-off from Lake Prespa near the island of Golem Grad, Macedonia

File:Pogled od Crn kamen Jablanica.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 08:11:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The slopes of the mountain Jablanica seen from the peak Crn Kamen (2,258 m), Macedonia

File:Altenstein-Kapelle-Ruine-266191.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 21:43:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Remains of the chapel of Altenstein ruin

File:2013.05.18.-24-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim-Vierfleck-Weibchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 15:48:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Four-spotted chaser - Libellula quadrimaculata, female

File:MB&F HMX Black Badger Blue.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 15:18:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by MB&F - uploaded by MB&F - nominated by Claus Obana -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very clean photo, but please add to your file description the fact that this is a watch, because it's not clear just by looking at it, and I think supplying just a link isn't optimal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For description. I had to see official page what am i looking at. Can anyone read what time is it !? Otherwise good commercial shot. --Mile (talk) 08:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others about the description. Documentation for an FP should be just as good as the photo. Regarding the photo, it is no doubt a very good photo but I simply fail to be wow-ed by yet another advertisement using black on black to make their product look cool. It looks rather flat and clinical. --cart-Talk 09:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • It's a clear FP photography-wise in my book, but Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per the others re documentation. It really is necessary to get these things done before nominating.--Peulle (talk) 10:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

File:MB&F Arachnophobia Black.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 15:16:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by MB&F - uploaded by MB&F - nominated by Claus Obana -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, but again, please add a prose description to the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose insufficient description Ezarateesteban 20:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As above...seems like copying Jeff Deboer. --Mile (talk) 08:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 10:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per others. Daniel Case (talk) 14:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Wolf spider (Lycosidae; Slovenia).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 06:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wolf spider (Lycosidae; Slovenia)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Lycosidae (Wolf spiders)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Wolf spider (Lycosidae; Slovenia), size of body bellow 2 cm. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 06:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 06:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Background is "busy", but I have to support you for getting such an amazingly clear larger-than-life picture of this spider, and I mean every visible part of the spider is in focus. That's really impressive. Is this a single shot? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great light and I really like how the grass and leaf gives a depth to the overall photo. This could be an illustration in a childrens' book, the kind a parent would read and point out all the little details to their child. --cart-Talk 09:10, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 11:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Ikan Kekek Its stacked shot, if you mean for composition, i have 2 more shots, but as cart said, light and background/composition is best here - for childrens book. --Mile (talk) 13:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, unfortunate background, but the sharpness and detail with this impressive depth of field is outstanding. Charles (talk) 13:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info For background, this is their habitat. They don't spin webs and don't catch their prey in them, they do that on the ground. Actually, I am very happy with background, isnt so easy to capture it. --Mile (talk) 14:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • I should have said the leaf is distracting, and as I said, an outstanding image. Charles (talk) 15:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • No, the leaf is part of the story. - "...and so Peter the Spider walked along the grass straw, down to the curled up brown leaf where Amanda the Ladybug had hidden the treasure." That's all for tonight kids. Goodnight and sleep tight. :) --cart-Talk 19:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:École Marcelle-Mallet.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2017 at 21:40:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

École Marcelle-Mallet
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- The Photographer 21:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Quite striking, but there appear to be stitching errors just above and to the right of the central cross. If they're not stitching errors, they're something else that needs to be fixed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Why is the photo slightly off-center? -- King of ♠ 05:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Stitching problems, need PD corrections. --Mile (talk) 05:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The main building is too gray-- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 10:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The image is too unnatural. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose I can see what you were thinking but it just didn't come together. Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sure what projection this is, but it isn't working for me. Perhaps just too wide-angle? I can see why you want to keep the upper-clouds but the sky is a bit inconsistent with some parts dark and less good to look at, and I think this unbalances the composition having so much sky. The building hasn't got great light on it, which would really help make it pop with some raking sunlight. As others noted, the viewpoint is off-centre in a way that doesn't quite work, and the sky has some stitching glitches. There's quite a lot of gravel foreground, which isn't that interesting. A square crop of the central part of the building would avoid the perspective issues. I think it needs to either be centred closely or else much more off-centre. Is there no way you can get further back to photograph it? -- Colin (talk) 16:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Auguste Mariette photography.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2017 at 21:01:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Auguste Mariette by Nadar, ca.1861
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Nadar - uploaded by Jebulon - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kasir (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Respectfully, I mildly Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, because as good as this is, I think the restoration process isn't complete and the dark shape just above and to the viewer's left of the man's head is probably just a product of the damage shown in the original scan. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you Kasir for choice. I did my best with this very difficult restoration. I think perfection requested is not of this world...--Jebulon (talk) 16:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Why would it be so difficult to make the dark area about the same as the rest of the background? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
This is the best version --Kasir (talk) 19:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
That's an argument for VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. I agree it was a spirited restoration, and you started from very far back, but I don't think the result is up there with our other featured restorations. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Parque del castillo de Goluchow, Polonia, 2016-12-21, DD 29.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2017 at 13:21:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the arboretum surrounding the Gołuchów Castle, Greater Poland, Poland.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the arboretum surrounding the Gołuchów Castle, Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland. The arboretum is the largest landscape park in Greater Poland and also on its own a registered polish monument. Poco2 13:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 13:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I love this composition, but the lack of DoF IMHO. My recomendation is take two pictures to use a merge image technique or use tripod if the light conditions are very low, however, maybe it´s not the case.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I was thinking the same thing; too few of the trees are sharp, IMO. Good composition, though.--Peulle (talk) 19:13, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition --Mile (talk) 05:55, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The shallow DOF helps create an organic, three-dimensional impression. Absolutely fine with me. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice light, but shallow DOF is imho very distracting, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 07:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Martin. Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Κίονας Αθηνάς - Ακαδημία Αθηνών 1186.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2017 at 10:09:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Statue of Athena, Academy of Athens
The Photographer, I assume you don't consider it sharp enough (although it is in focus), but can you please add notes at the dust spots?--C messier (talk) 21:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lighting does it no favors. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Statue of Saints Cyril and Methodius on Radhošť.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 11:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Statue of Saints Cyril and Methodius on Radhošť, Czech Republic
Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 23:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Spb 06-2017 img47 Church on the Blood.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 08:58:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Savior on Blood
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Bird's eye-view of Church of the Savior on Blood and Griboyedov Canal in Saint Petersburg, Russia - all by A.Savin --A.Savin 08:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 08:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The overall tone is too grey-- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 09:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think this should be rotated into portrait. Perhaps anticlock. --Mile (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for the general composition.--Peulle (talk) 09:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 11:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Capricorn4049 (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great image. Birds' eye views are always awesome to look at, even if (according to a photographer I was chatting with the other day) they're often judged as a fad in more "serious" photo competitions. -- Thennicke (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice, good job. --Selbymay (talk) 18:37, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Quite visually arresting. But I wonder whether it would look better with a bit of noise reduction. What do you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I did my usual portion (for Phantom always more than for DSLR) in Lightroom. Some remaining noise in darker areas is inevitable, but I'm eagerly awaiting a Phantom with more megapixels, less noise, and not much more weight and price... )) --A.Savin 09:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unsual view and it works. --C messier (talk) 10:12, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Because it looks like some kind of weird steampunk machinery. :) --cart-Talk 18:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 05:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per cart. It has the technical shortcomings of most drone pictures, but it's an arresting view that only the drone could have gotten. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Wandeltocht rond Lago di Pian Palù (1800 m). in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië) 46.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 04:34:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Sparragus pickers.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 03:39:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - A bit of noise, but I like the composition and the documentary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan, I also like that the seemingly random people form a sort of symmetry in the photo. --cart-Talk 09:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Benh (talk) 17:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik (edits) 17:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please look at the note, what is it? --Neptuul (talk) 21:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It looks like some sort of weed stem. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:27, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Could you please provide a geocode or at least the place where this is taken? The file page says nothing about this. --cart-Talk 04:34, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It was taken in the valley of Maneadero, south of Ensenada, Baja California... but it could have been taken anywhere... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Well, not anywhere. The asparagus pickers where I live, lie in a sort of vehicles when they pick or sit. I have sorted out the categories for you based on the new info. Thank you! :) --cart-Talk 09:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent composition, need noise reduction --The Photographer 21:13, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I know they were hard at work, but the poses ... almost make them look like a dance troupe. Daniel Case (talk) 14:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Agricultural workers are a special breed... They work in what amounts to inhumane conditions. Stoop labor is backbreaking labor, which generates terrible medical conditions later on in life. Migration, on the other hand, and an aging population puts the food supply at risk. This happens because of work conditions and the attractiveness of city jobs. We´ll see what happens... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for share this image and history, very kind documentary work. I hope see more pictures about the illegal situation and modern slave work on US border. --The Photographer 19:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Weissfluhjoch Panorama winter labeled.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 00:36:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Weissfluhjoch Panorama winter labeled.jpg

File:Swiss Camp (Greenland), aerial photography 4.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 00:34:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial recording of Swiss Camp (Greenland)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Capricorn4049
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but I'm not seeing the quality I expect from an FP; the detail is just not high enough.--Peulle (talk) 12:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - This photo is pretty noisy in the sky and last time I checked, it had apparently been declined at QIC for technical reasons. I'm not seeing anything about the photo that's so outstanding in other ways as to prompt an FP designation in spite of that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support – Interesting composition, very good colors, sharp enough, for me not too noisy -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 00:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Faust tower - Maulbronn Monastery.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2017 at 20:00:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Faust tower, Maulbronn Monastery, Maulbronn, Germany
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - As a musician, of course I know the Faust story. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I just focus on the picture. Its story has nothing to do with me. -- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 04:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

File:House of Perkūnas, Kaunas, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2017 at 18:13:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The exterior of House of Perkūnas in Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Pofka -- Pofka (talk) 18:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -- Pofka (talk) 18:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: The shadow in the lower right corner -- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 03:53, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The shadow in the lower right and the crop on the left both bother me too much. Perhaps FP with different framing -- Thennicke (talk) 06:53, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: @Thennicke: @Clear Sky C: Nothing can be done about the shadow because the street where this exceptional building stands is a narrow old town street with another buildings on the other side. This image does not have any shadows on the building itself and I think that is the best you can have in this place. I think the crop on the left is fine as well because this is the place where the ancient wall of this building ends and new modern gates starts. Examine this place by yourself: here -- Pofka (talk) 08:10, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • That may be true, but it doesn't change the fact that I don't get "wow" from this image. It's a good QI though -- Thennicke (talk) 13:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Reluctant oppose per Clear Sky C. If he hadn't pointed it out, I might never have noticed it, but once you see it you can't unsee it. Daniel Case (talk) 21:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Pernegg Kloster Turm 20170128.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2017 at 09:32:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pernegg Monastery, Lower Austria
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Enclosing walls of the former monastery Pernegg, Lower Austria. This was taken at a temperature of -18° Celsius. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -18° Celsius and sunshine would have been nice. Charles (talk) 11:26, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like the mood and don't need sunshine for it. This is a very rugged type of beauty, and the cold is more palpable in the dark mist. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jaw-dropping. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 18:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 20:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 03:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I don't like the twoo cropped bushes - they interfere with the composition. Can they be cropped out or cloned? -- Thennicke (talk) 06:54, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support I would clone out the bush bottom right. --XRay talk 07:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice juxtaposition of the bright, almost fractal branches and the dark rectilinear tower. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info @Thennicke, Thennicke: New version uploaded, where the partly visible bushes are cropped and retouched out. --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Thennicke (talk) 06:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Köttmannsdorf Unterschlossberg Drau Ferlacher Stausee Matzen Ferlacher Horn 09102017 1434.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2017 at 05:59:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ferlach reservoir of the river Drava in Unterschlossberg (below the castle Hollenburg), municipality Köttmannsdorf, district Klagenfurt Land, Carinthia, Austria, EU
  • You're very welcome. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 18:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looks awesome but there's a black spot on the dark green hillside on the left. Please fix it.--Peulle (talk) 20:49, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Black spot was being removed. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 09:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit fuzzy at distance, but I don't think much could have been done about that. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Capricorn4049 (talk) 00:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 03:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 07:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 07:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:10, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:27, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yes, Absolutely -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 02:34, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good image, good composition, nice place Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support GOOD choice/nomination/picture/composition/framing/colors/place. Vielleicht vergesse ich etwas, Entschuldigung.--Jebulon (talk) 16:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Rdeča mušnica (Amanita muscaria).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2017 at 05:52:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Amanita muscaria var. aureola. Location: Golovec hill, near Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Mile - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Awesome amanita picture! The depth of field is about as close to ideal as possible, and the level of detail is outstanding. There's also a tiny little insect on the mushroom's shaft - can any of you identify it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great photo. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Johann. I especially like how the background fades to black (making the mushroom stand out), and yet the lighting is even -- Thennicke (talk) 07:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanx Ikan Kekek for nomination. And true, Thennicke, i was looking for a mushroom which i can dissolve with black background, so object become more clear. --Mile (talk) 08:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, I just wish this would be in portrait format --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --cart-Talk 09:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Excellent @PetarM:, but portrait format for me too. Charles (talk) 11:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interesting question Charles, Uoaei1, more topic for me. I asked myselve while ago, why people use mostly panorama and not portrait at mushrooms. Probably because of T form, otherwise i even tried portrait; i didnt even shot, what i saw on viewfinder was enough to abandon portrait. And mostly they do it in panorama. So answer here is no. I dont tell that is always necessary, but in my case was. And probably in most FPs on Commons also. For checking more see Fungi photos. Google can admit that. I saw situtation for portrait shot, as they grow like that. Someday i will try. --Mile (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well it would be silly to not vote when anyone wanting to use the image cropped can crop it. Charles (talk) 13:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Giancarlolozza, thanks for dropping by this board and for your vote. What's the rule in terms of eligibility to vote? I don't see 50 prior edits, but he's been a Commoner since no later than 9 July 2008, so does he become eligible by virtue of length of membership, providing he signs in and doesn't just vote using his IP address? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
    That IP address is an open proxy. LX (talk, contribs) 15:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • So I guess the vote is invalid. Why can open proxies be blocked on sight? Only some of them that have a history of trolling or vandalism, I think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect!--Ermell (talk) 19:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I, too, would prefer it in portrait, but I accept Mile's reasoning for why he kept it this way. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great sharpness, a worthy FP. Also a VI, I think.--Peulle (talk) 20:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • @Peulle so far just Italian Wiki has article for this variant of mushroom, but enough for VI i think. I will put it.--Mile (talk) 21:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 03:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 06:18, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharp! Mile, what lens did you use? --Basotxerri (talk) 19:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Its macro lens-Zuiko 60 mm. --Mile (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another great stacking shot -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me it is not a FP. The quality of the mushroom is very good. But not more. There is no composition at all. The background is just black. I have no feeling when I look at it. --Hockei (talk) 18:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:2016R1442 - Київ.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2017 at 17:17:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

33/34 Bohdana Khmelnytskoho Street, Kiev, Ukraine

File:Schloss Favorite Ludwigsburg 2017 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2017 at 12:12:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by me -- Thennicke (talk) 12:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love the contrast in this image between the snow and the golden building -- Thennicke (talk) 12:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support stunning Charles (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Claus 13:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 15:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 17:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - After a long horse cart ride through the snow, we finally approach the gleaming Schloss. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I won't break the chain of support, but I would think this would be better in fall where the contrast wouldn't be so prominent also sharper, what am I not seeing? Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:10, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • I think what you're not seeing (or feeling) is the fairytale winter landscape that I gave a scenario for above. And it's quite sharp enough, IMO, even not accounting for the huge resolution - it's 10,670 × 4,096 pixels! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • @Sixflashphoto: And I don't see what's wrong with the contrast? It increases the wow IMHO -- Thennicke (talk) 00:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
After some more contemplation I decided you were both right. It's a winter shot and contrast is unavoidable. I support this now. *Symbol support vote.svg Support


Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik (edits) 13:16, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places#Architecture

File:Benasque - Llanos del Hospital 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2017 at 09:42:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rainbow over the Llanos del Hospital plains, Benasque. Huesca, Aragon, Spain
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --cart-Talk 09:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 10:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 19:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 07:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sky is a bit noisy though. --Hockei (talk) 07:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Its better, but i would put so much sat in rainbow, blue especially. --Mile (talk) 08:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 09:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik (edits) 13:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural#Spain

File:Long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) Labuk Bay.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2017 at 09:18:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) Labuk Bay


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik (edits) 13:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals

File:Monumento de Guerra, Jardín del Patio, Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2017 at 08:58:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

War memorial monument ("Kriegerdenkmal"), Hofgarten, Munich, Germany.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Monuments_and_memorials
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info War memorial monument ("Kriegerdenkmal"), Hofgarten, in front of the Bayerische Staatskanzlei, Munich, Germany. The monument is composed of an open crypt, that consist of 12 stone blocks, lcoated in the middle of a rectangular pit. The crypt just contains the statue of a dead soldier, a work of Bernhard Bleeker. The monument was inaugurated in 1924 but the origintal statue, that was replaced by a bronze cast in 1972, and is now exhibited in the Bavarian Army museum in Ingolstadt. All by me, Poco2 08:58, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 08:58, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Thennicke (talk) 11:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ah, that was on my bucket list as well... well, too late. Good, important nom. But why didn't you use a tripod? Technically the image could be better. Considering that it was taken handheld, it's awesome, of course, and it's certainly good enough to pass here. But it's not that the monument is so crowded that using a tripod is impossible... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
    Well, I shot it without a tripod, checked the quality, I found it pretty good and came to the conclusion that a tripod wasn't really required. To be honest I didn't expect then to nominate it for FPC but when I saw it on the monitor I really enjoyed the lighting, so, here we're...Poco2 17:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A little distorted, but maybe since it was handheld that can't be helped anymore than it might have already been. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 20:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Not the sharpest but quite good for the conditions. -- King of ♠ 01:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - I'm neutral because the size of the photo is probably great enough for the noise and unsharpness of the statue and closer foreground to be OK, but I really don't understand why several of you think that we should relax our standards ("considering/since it was handheld") because Poco chose unnecessarily not to use a tripod. Why should we take into consideration that a tripod was not used in a situation in which it could have been used? The more I think about that in particular, the more tempted I am to oppose on that basis, but I will not, because of the aforementioned file size, and also the excellent composition and combination of light and shade. It may be good enough to feature - but without consideration of how it was taken. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
    Ikan: I totally disagree with your comment and the direction it goes. The main reason why we all take our cameras and go out is because it is fun. I cannot agree that anybody takes away my freedom to take the pictures the way, when and how I want. If a picture deserves a FP star it should get it, independently whether it could be even better. If your point would be considered valid the next one would say "why did you use that lens instead of that other one, I am sure the result would have been even better for this scene" or "why where you there at 2 p.m. instead of 5 p.m. the ligthing then would have been even better" or "why didn't you used that day your 50 MPx camera and just the 40 MPx one"? Sorry, but we are talking about freedom and about fun here. Pictures have to be judged the way they are. If somebody tops one we can always start a delist and replace process but that's a different story. Poco2 06:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • I'm not saying it isn't good enough to feature; I'm saying that we shouldn't judge the photo by lower standards because you didn't use a tripod. That's what it sounds to me like some people are doing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • And by the way, it's extremely common for FPC nominations to fail because of criticism that the time when the photo was taken wasn't as good as it could have been. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Ikan: the question hier ist the "even" before "better". If a picture is over the FP bar, than it should become FP. If the picture is below it shouldn't, and if the reason for that is the timing, the equipment, whather, then that's perfectly fine. But my impression here was that you consider that the picture deserves FP status but you didn't support because it could have been managed even better. Poco2 07:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • No, I'm genuinely neutral. I think it may warrant a feature, but I'm not sure because the noise and unsharpness in the foreground give me some pause. And I wanted to express my opinion that we should judge the photo as it is, not by handicapping it on the basis of it being a hand-held photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Ok, got you, Ikan. I missunderstood you. Poco2 18:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm sorry, but the main subject is not sharp enough for me. --Ivar (talk) 06:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 10:49, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:08, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for the wow factor despite the technical shortcomings.--Peulle (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Santorin (GR), Fira -- 2017 -- 2624.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2017 at 06:04:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Window in Fira, Santorin, Griechenland


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik (edits) 14:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture#Greece

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Mini -- 2016 -- 5065-71.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2017 at 06:01:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

BMW Mini on a country lane in the hamlet Börnste, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created anf uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 06:01, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 06:01, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support We dont see much cars here. --Mile (talk) 06:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - The car is well photographed, but it's the fantastic background with its great light and shade that really makes the photo special to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:09, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I could do without the text on the car but the concept is refreshingly new. Do you have many of these driver-less cars rolling about in Germany? Face-wink.svg --cart-Talk 09:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
I think I would noticed. --XRay talk 09:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik (edits) 14:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles

File:Yixian Hongcun 2016.09.09 18-00-34.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2017 at 11:29:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hongcun, Anhui, China.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info w:Hongcun, a World Heritage Site in China, created, uploaded & nominated by myself. -- Zhangzhugang (talk) 11:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Zhangzhugang (talk) 11:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose I like the composition and colors, but it's just too unsharp in the background, even accounting for the mist. Daniel Case (talk) 17:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Background is extremely blurry. -- Pofka (talk) 15:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
    • I don't think the blurry background is a aisadvantages.Instead. it can ruin the artistic conception if the background is too clear.-- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 04:01, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support blue hour, peaceful atmosphere --Neptuul (talk) 21:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Inside 118 inch HDPE pipe.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2017 at 03:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Quite interesting and different. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support sure --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:16, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting but not wowing. Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cool shot, I like the cable snaking its way towards the camera. :) --Peulle (talk) 06:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yesss! More black on black. Very 'Der dritte Mann'-esque. :) --cart-Talk 08:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Shot is good, but i would crop right side and some above, to bring center of light more to third rule. --Mile (talk) 14:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 20:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Would be perfect if the persons were in focus--Ermell (talk) 12:32, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • And the page history says that the above vote was made by Ermell but you have to sign it to make it legit, please. --cart-Talk 08:33, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --B dash (talk) 10:32, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice idea, however, the people border look soft --The Photographer 23:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 10:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 02:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Saslonch udu da Mont de Seuc.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2017 at 21:15:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunset on the Seiser Alm in South Tyrol, with the mountains of Langkofel group in the background

File:Skeppsbrokajen Gamla Stan from Skeppsholmen Stockholm 2016 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2017 at 19:55:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skeppsbrokajen Gamla Stan from Skeppsholmen Stockholm
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by W.carter -- cart-Talk 19:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is a view I know by heart so I'm very picky with how it is depicted. It has been painted thousands of times and photographed even more and this is one of the best depictions of it I've ever seen. The light, going in a gradient from left to right, shows off the curve of the quay very well. For those who may not know this area; this is the east side of the small island that is the heart and origin of Stockholm. The foreground with its promenade is just as important as a historic landmark. -- cart-Talk 19:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Oooh yes. Beautiful light. Like a painting. -- Colin (talk) 20:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Irresistible --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely colors, like a painting --The Photographer 20:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support artwork.--Ermell (talk) 21:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow, normal shot for me, more people are disturb --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great lighting, especially with the clouds on the left, though composition on the right could be better. -- King of ♠ 22:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks like an old painting. Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 07:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think some of Julian's other recent uploads are far better than this one, and more deserving of the star -- Thennicke (talk) 11:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Agree, good, cold tonality, but people could be out. --Mile (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 16:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Daniel. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 06:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The 3 persons are not disturbing at all, they make this image more natural --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • +1 Cities and towns are places built by people for people and they are a natural part of the scenery there. In this case I think they add to the composition by giving it more depth. --cart-Talk 08:12, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • +1, I can't to be more agree because people are important in a certain type of photography, it makes the composition more human. It would be kinky to think that in a city there is no one there like the land without humans. --The Photographer 17:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • The couple walking and the man with the red hat both add a little to the picture. The lady obscured by the street pole is unfortunate though. Many of the very best urban photos feature someone in the frame, and often when you read about how they were taken, the photographer set up their camera and waited patiently for someone to come along and add the necessary life to their picture. I don't think that's quite the perfect moment here, but without people at all it would be a sterile photo. We are perhaps used to photos without people at FPC (vs the real world that is all about photos of people / with people) because it is the next level of hardness to get right. -- Colin (talk) 08:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Agree that positioning people in a photo is harder but it can be worth the wait. You could also get some other living thing in the scene. In this painting of the same veiw, the artist has added two birds in the same place where we have people in this photo. --cart-Talk 08:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --B dash (talk) 10:33, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:45, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 02:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Wedding ring with heart shadow.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2017 at 16:07:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wedding ring with heart shadow
  • I thought is was a version of a saying we have in Swedish and that there were similar sayings in other languages: "Två människor möts, blir kära och ljuv musik uppstår." (Two people meet, fall in love and sweet music arises.) --cart-Talk 14:45, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
This is getting to be a common wedding picture ... the rings making these heart-shaped shadows in a book. Depending on the couple's preference it's either a religious text open to a section with text relevant to the couple (usually 1 Corinthians 13:4–8) or (like this) music used in the ceremony. Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Orthotomicus laricis (32330826995).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2017 at 18:33:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Will remove as soon as very obvious processing errors corrected. @Christian Ferrer: Charles (talk) 09:29, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --B dash (talk) 10:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:46, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 02:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)