Commons:特色图片评选

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:
Skip to current candidates 跳转至评选区
此处的图片评选区交流主要使用英语,如果需要中文交流区,请前往中文维基百科的本地评选区

特色图片评选


FPCandiateicon.svg

欢迎来到特色图片评选!社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一,即特色图片每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻,也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云:“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像,请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识,图像就会成功入选。

这里列出了特色图片的评选记录,你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片:2004年2005年, 2006年2007年2008年2009年2010年2011年2012年2013年2014年2015年2016年2017年2018年2019年2020 以及本月

关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述,请参阅我们的年度评选

规范[edit]

  • 投票周期为10天,之后的投票将无效。
  • 欢迎匿名用户提名并参与讨论。
  • 提名者可以随时撤回提名。
  • 每个注册用户都可以投票,匿名用户的票将不统计。
  • 如果提名5天后没有支持票,该提名将提前结束。
  • 通过的标准:至少5个支持票,支持票与反对票比例大于2/1。
  • 完成的投票保存在存档
  • 参见投票结束后操作指引

提名[edit]

如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像,并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可,那么请按照如下步骤操作:

1. 按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg)在下方的文本框输入图像名称,然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。

如果本次提名为第n次提名,请按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg/2)展开操作。

所有的新图片集提名页面都应按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination)进行。


2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。(注:打开编辑页面后,您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表,请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部(在本行后)”;您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士(除了顶部)”。 )

3. 点击此处并按如下格式在图片候选区顶端加入新内容:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg}}

推荐操作:COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。

可选操作:如果您不是图像的创建者,请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”(不含括号)。

注意,你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当![edit]

光暗度[edit]

Shadowtest.jpg

在讨论图像的光暗度的时候,投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示,它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个(甚至四个)圈子,那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子,你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数,故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话,也可以考虑把它打印出来。

色彩度[edit]

Colortest.png

在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图,图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合,你则须要调校你的伽玛设置(在电脑的输出设置上,而不在于屏幕显示),直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难,然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意,在液晶显示(无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕)上观看图片,你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要,请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Dusky Grasswren 0A2A9591.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2022 at 18:10:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dusky Grasswren

File:Tufted titmouse fluffed up (46418)crop.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2022 at 17:31:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tufted titmouse fluffed up

File:Templo funerario de Hatshepsut, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2022 at 14:47:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view during sunrise of the Mortuary Temple of Hatshepsut, Luxor, Egypt.

File:Litl-Toppøya by Reinefjorden and Festhæltinden in Moskenes, Nordland, Norway, 2022 June.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2022 at 08:51:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Bengali-Style Fermented Rice,Kolkata - West Bengal - DSC 0041.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2022 at 08:48:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Upwas Special Sabudana Khichadi.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2022 at 20:58:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Indian breakfast dish
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Meals_(food_and_drink)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Sharvarism - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 20:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Another excellent capture from Wiki loves Food in India - not as colorful as the one Ikan nominated, but it has a different appeal in my eyes. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 20:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I like the simple composition and the light, but the sharpness is on the low side for an 8.6 megapixel photo. Cmao20 (talk) 02:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose when I first saw the image, my eyes were immediately lured to the background – poor salience; not an FP, sorry. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the sharpness is quite good at a larger-than-life size, and I like the table and don't think it's a problem to contrast the lighter colors of the food and wooden spoon with the darker colors of the table, but rather, that that was a good artistic decision by the photographer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support per Cmao20 and Ikan. The background is OK for me because it uses a repetitive pattern – atfer a second or two my mind has grasped it and concentrates fully on the dish. --Aristeas (talk) 08:33, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 21:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:1581 Bunting clover leaf map.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2022 at 18:22:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bünting Clover Leaf Map

File:View towards Segla from ridge at Hesten in Senja, Troms og Finnmark, Norway, 2022 August.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2022 at 18:16:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A view towards Segla and Seggelskaret

File:Lilly Walther. Mehe portree. 1909.TKMB0822.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2022 at 05:47:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"A portrait of a man" by Lilly Walther (1909)
  • Thanks. I don't think charcoal and graphite are the same thing, though they are two forms of carbon. I am still living with this composition and have not made a decision on a possible vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Great, but there is a small scratch on the lower left. Yann (talk) 12:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent reproduction. – I wonder whether we should remove that small scratch or not. On the one hand it irritates, on the other hand it seems to be on the original artwork, therefore one could argue it is an authentic part of the original. Hm … If you want, I can remove it. --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd treat that scratch as part of the original artwork and keep it. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kardhang Biling Bhaga Dhauladhar Oct22 A7C 04645.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2022 at 09:49:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Villages on the Bhaga River
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:49, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kardhang and Biling villages, on either side of the Bhaga River, elev. above 3,000 m (10,000 ft), in Lahaul, Himachal Pradesh. Leh–Manali Highway running down the right side of the Bhaga River. View from Shashur Gompa elev. 3,450 m (11,320 ft) -- Tagooty (talk) 09:49, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Beautifully captured. But a couple of artefacts in the sky and one dark spot in the shadowy area on the mountain at left right. Should be easy to remove. Other than that a truly awe-inspiring scenery and it's a Symbol support vote.svg Support from me contingent on removal of the spots. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done @UnpetitproleX: Thanks for pointing out these spots. --Tagooty (talk) 13:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's way better, but there are still a couple of small remnants. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • ✓ Done @Ikan Kekek: Hope I've got the last 2. If not, would appreciate if you could add a note to the image. --Tagooty (talk) 06:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Strophariaceae 13-11-2022. (d.j.b).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2022 at 06:27:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Spicy Anda Curry.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2022 at 00:18:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Anda Curry or Egg Curry is generally a spicy dish, it can be made in different styles with different masala (spices) and boiled eggs, it can be served with rotis, parathas or rice
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by User:Sharvarism - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:18, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The egg curry looks delicious, it's sharp, and I find this a good composition except that some of the crops could be more generous. Whether the crops are a reason to oppose is to your discretion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:18, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I find the concrete distracting. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice food photography! (which we need more of) – Great composition; very appealing; I like how the colors command this image. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:10, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Stunning. I've spent quite a bit looking at this image, trying to capture all the little details that went into making it: the careful food arrangement, the off-center composition, the choice of colours, the focus point with just the right amount of depth of field. The only niggle I have is with the harsh highlights on portions of the curry, perhaps a more diffused light source would have helped --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:27, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Julesvernex2. --Aristeas (talk) 09:49, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support You were faster, Ikan, I thought about nominating this myself :) --Kritzolina (talk) 11:08, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:12, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Now this one is appetizing. --A.Savin 17:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 23:37, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Valued nomination of an original subject. Striking vivid colors. The crop is tight on 3 sides, though acceptable in my view, thanks to the thickness of the bowl -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay 💬 10:26, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the framing is not working for me: it's more disturbing than creating a dynamic or whatever --PierreSelim (talk) 13:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Understood. Either way, it's nice to see you here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Zhou Fang. Court Ladies Playing Double-sixes. Freer Gallery of Art.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2022 at 18:23:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Zhou Fang. Court Ladies Playing Double-sixes. Freer Gallery of Art

File:2017-02-26 Natalie Geisenberger (Siegerehrung) by Sandro Halank–3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2022 at 17:58:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Natalie Geisenberger with the Globe for the Overall World Cup winner at the award ceremony at the Luge World Cup in Altenberg 2017

Polyommatus icarus underside[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2022 at 08:34:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Acanthocardia echinata mucronata (European prickly cockle), shell[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2022 at 06:10:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

File:European starling at Bodega Head-1209.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2022 at 00:55:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) at Bodega Head, California

File:Indus Valley near Leh.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2022 at 23:16:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Indus Valley near Leh

File:Aerial image of Grand Prismatic Spring (view from the south).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2022 at 18:27:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial image of Grand Prismatic Spring in Yellowstone National Park (view from the south)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Volcanism
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 18:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 18:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose That's a bit of a dissapointing quality for a daylight shot taken with a D5. I even initially thought this was shot with a cheap drone. Not sure what went wrong. - Benh (talk) 20:05, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Benh, thank you for your review. I took this image through the pilot’s window while flying a Cessna 172 at approximately 100 knots (185 km/h) with a fairly long focal length of 190 mm because I had to fly at least 600 m (2000 ft) above ground level over the national park. Even with the short exposure time of 1/1600 s, there was some motion blur in the raw image, which I corrected with a sharpening software tool. Unfortunately, there is some residual motion blur visible in the image, which I was unable to correct. I uploaded four different pictures of Grand Prismatic Spring that I took during the flight. In my opinion, this image has the best composition of the four, so I selected it for the nomination. I would be interested to learn whether one of the other images would be acceptable for you. --Carsten Steger (talk) 20:42, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • If 1/1600 is not enough, why not aiming at even faster shutter speed? I don't think you need f/10 and you can easily go for f/4 or wider if you lens permits it. None of the other shots stands out (they are equally good composition wise to me). It's really the quality that is a deal breaker, in my opinion, of course. - Benh (talk) 17:14, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh. I have to agree that the image quality of this beautiful sight is not high enough for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it. For my eyes the sharpness is just OK, and hey, this is still more resolution than the other 11 aerial views of this spring. It seems quite rare too -- I don't think drones are allowed there. --A.Savin 22:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per A.Savin. Actually this is still a stunning photo in my eyes. --Aristeas (talk) 08:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Carsten: Every time I see your photos, I think: You make an admirable effort and take almost/already professional aerial photography! However, in the end the quality of the photos at pixel level is not as great as it should be. I suspect it’s due to some camera settings and/or to the post-processing. Maybe you would just have to change a few things to make your photos even better. This isn’t the right place to discuss it, but maybe we could discuss elsewhere with some others what it might be. I don’t mean this as criticism, but as help, because I really estimate your work. --Aristeas (talk) 08:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 92-94 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2022 at 16:01:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wall of one of the north side chambers of the Great Temple of Abu Simbel, Egypt.
  • Nythar I can't judge whether it looks painful to you but to me it looks pretty loyal to what you can find there. The light is not uniform but very limited and strong. You can also check other images of this chamber on Commons other in the Internet. Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Just googled it and yes, they all look like that. It's just the lighting, but the image is really good. NytharT.C 08:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:40, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Others#Frescos_and_murals

File:FrankfurtOder asv2022-07 img01 Holy Cross Church.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2022 at 11:09:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Holy Cross Church in Frankfurt (Oder)

File:Althaea cannabina. 04-08-2022 (actm.).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2022 at 05:30:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm still seeing some remnants of halos, especially on the stem. You also might see a hot pixel now and then between petals. I realize a lot of this is very nitpicky, but see what you can find. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:29, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
    :::*✓ Done @Ikan Kekek: By hot pixels between the petals, do you mean the dark red dots on the petals? Otherwise, would you like to add a note to the hot pixels? then I can find them better. Thanks in advance.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't know; I can't see them anymore. I suppose the remaining things that could be halos are instead reflections. This is an impressive photo to me, with a nice, relaxing composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The flower is very pretty and the background is harmonious. Significant stacking defects are no longer visible to me. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan and Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 13:49, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose On an aesthetic level, sorry but I find the color of this background 1. unnatural, 2. inharmonious, and 3. ugly, like in the previous nomination. My personal point of view concerning these artificial backgrounds displaying arbitrary colors like interior wallpapers is that they often ruin the charm of the natural subject depicted on the image. Flowers are living organisms met in particular environments, and these environments usually contribute to the elegance of the subject with textures, bokeh, gradients, etc. Distorting the context that way is like diminishing the value of the content. I understand the trick makes easier the potential retouches incumbent on the focus stacking process, nevertheless the result also spoils the visual impact compared to original natural compositions. By contrast, the color of the flower appears dull and fake here, in my opinion. Moreover, as part of the framing, I find the crop too tight at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:08, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
*Note: the main reason I photograph flowers on thin twigs in a wind-free place is that it is almost always windy in Friesland. Then it is impossible to take a stack of 33 photos without motion blur. The background I use is matched to the color of the flower. You take beautiful long exposure photos of waterfalls. How unnatural is that!?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • You sometimes manage to focus-stack flowers in their natural environment, like this one or that one, then the problem of the wind is often surmountable. Also, it is not an absolute requirement to make the whole plant in focus with multiple frames, when nominating a picture at FPC, a single beautiful shot with enough DoF can also produce a wonderful photograph, if the light is special. You're saying the flower matches the background color, but I don't think so, because this brown is too saturated. Thus "it steals the show". You seem to favor the technique over the subject, but is it a wise choice? Sorry but I have no idea what this flower looks like in a natural context, with this picture. And what about the transparency of the petals? Photographic technique is useful when the trick is at the service of the subject. But if the subject gets changed because the technique requires such artificial modifications, I think it is better to step backward, and to search for the essence again -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:31, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vista de Florencia desde Piazzale Michelangelo, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 212-214 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2022 at 00:02:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Italy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A beautiful sunset cityscape of an incredibly beautiful city. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Indeed :) Thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 07:00, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The picture brings back fond memories. The city is photographed from this point countless times every day, but very rarely in this excellent quality. -Aristeas (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 23:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --BigDom (talk) 11:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Bravo Diego, muito bom. -Terragio67 (talk) 13:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:54, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I would love to have seen more details, but I understand that it must be a limitation of the camera sensor --Wilfredor (talk) 16:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    What limitation ? 5DS ? And anyway, nothing that can't be overcome with a tripod and even multi exposures shots. - Benh (talk) 20:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • I believe that the 5DS sensor is capable of resolving as much detail as a modern sensor (dynamic range is another matter) so the limitation is probably on the lens (the 16-35mm f4 struggles with high-density sensors). Compared to the usual 20-25mp images we see here though, I think there's still plenty of detail. Diego, in any case, have you tried to fine-tune the AF? I've done it recently on my DSLRs, and the improvement is noticeable --Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:35, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment To be honest, I am really surprised that we are discussing resolution/level of details with this photo ;–). IMHO the detail level is absolutely fine when we consider that this is a single-shot, 3/5 seconds exposure at f/11 on a 50 megapixels sensor. Only few lenses will resolve more details on 50 megapixels, and not at f/11 (many modern lenses arrive peak resolution in most areas at f/4 or so), and the twilight also has its influence because it does not do justice to many small details with low contrast. Not long ago, in the time of 12 megapixels sensors, people would have gone crazy about the possibilty to capture so many details with a single shot … --Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Aristeas its a FP for sure, however, we are discussing how to improve the sharpness level, but this does not mean that we are ruling out the possibility of being FP. I know that prime or fixed lenses generate better sharpness quality. Poco a poco's photos are excellent, to be sure, but the sharpness level of Diliff, Colin and others are at a better density. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, when we consider the incredible expenditure Diliff used for his church interior photos, it’s no surprise that the sharpness is on another level. We cannot and should not expect or require that level. For “normal” (single shot) photographs, the most important things one can improve are the lens and the focussing, as Julesvernex2 has explained; and the stabilization, of course. --Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm with Aristeas here. I don't really understand this discussion, either. The image is out of a 5DS 50 MPx sensor without any downsizing, I just applied a crop to strengthen the panoramic effect and get rid of uninteresting sky. Diliff used a panorama head and took lots of frames for his awesome church interiors. Believe me, this was not the spot to do that, with tons of people around me trying to get a good a spot for selfies and if I had needed e.g. 30 minutes to take all pictures the lighting would have been very different between the first and last frames. In other words, panorama head approaches like those from Diliff work good in a church one hour long, but I guess that it would have been more complicated here. Julesvernex2 what problem do you see with the focus? and how do you fine-tune the AF? Poco a poco (talk) 09:40, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't think there's a problem with focus per se. As mentioned above, there's plenty of detail on this image (certainly more than on the lower resolution images we typically see here), but I've seen sharper 50mp single exposures. The expensive way to improve acutance would be to buy a sharper lens. The more sensible thing to try first is to fine-tune the AF (or micro-adjust the AF, in Canon's lingo), to make sure you're getting the most out of your camera-lens combo. Here's one way to do it, but feel free to shoot me an email to discuss it further --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm not sure if Wilfredor meant this, but the issue would be the exposure to me. Many details lost in the darker parts, and I personally like brighter night shots. If I had to review this objectively, it's a subpar night photo; with the horizon in the middle, the lack of brightness and yellowish WB. And I would also have to disagree when you say night cities views are not compatible with the "Diliff approach". He's proven that and there are plenty of other examples on Commons to support that claim. - Benh (talk) 18:08, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
very true, and we shall never take things for granted :) Benh (talk) 18:15, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I really have no idea what is supposedly wrong with the image quality of this 33 megapixel photo shot under low light conditions and in which the detail on Florence Cathedral is pinpoint sharp at full resolution, but each to their own, I guess. Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For most other cities, this would be a rather unexceptional cityscape. But this is Florence. Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:A unique frame of Humayun Tomb, Delhi.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 20:20:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Humayun's Tomb in Delhi
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Thesolorover - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 20:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another very impressive shot from WLM in India -- Kritzolina (talk) 20:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The log. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:33, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Quite poor quality. Particularly visible in the sky. The verticals are wrong on the right side. There's CA at the left. Colors are weird. The foreground doesn't work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I would support with a perspective correction. The log makes this interesting. Yann (talk) 10:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because I don't like the log blocking the tomb. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:14, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile Morin and Ikan Kekek --Sandro Halank (talk) 18:50, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose An interesting idea, as the filename suggests, and I don't blame the photographer but as all the other !votes make clear this just does not work (and it's not just the composition). With no supports beyond the nominator in five days, this nomination has no chance of passing at this point and it is past time for the nominator to withdraw it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As per above it has no chance of passing, I agree, but I thought FPX was supposed to be used for photos that were clearly and obviously below the standard of FP or that were copyright violations. I don't think this falls into either category. The quality is a little on the low side and the colours don't seem quite right but I like the effort at an original composition, the motif is beautiful and the detail is sharp - this is a long way from an iPhone or Android pic that has no pixel-level detail and would deserve an FPX. I don't think it's perfect but I'd be happy to see it on the main page. And we have already had one other voter saying they would support if a change were made - again suggesting this does not fall into the 'so irredeemably bad it deserves to be FPXed' category. Cmao20 (talk) 12:52, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Per the template's own documentation: "Please use it only where the nomination has no chance of success and where there are no existing support votes other than the nominator's" (Emphasis in original). Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gelada (Theropithecus gelada gelada) male 3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 15:38:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gelada (Theropithecus gelada gelada) male

File:Pedde du Coin des Hasards in Thiers (1).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 08:09:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pedde du Coin des Hasards in Thiers, Puy-de-Dôme, France

File:Marie-Elisabeth-Lüders-Haus-msu-0719-.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2022 at 08:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Marie-Elisabeth-Lüders-Haus is a legislative building in Berlin near the Reichstag. It is part of the “Federal Belt” of buildings in the urban design concept for Germany's government quarter.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Matthias Süßen - uploaded by Matthias Süßen - nominated by Matthias Süßen -- Matthias Süßen (talk) 08:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Matthias Süßen (talk) 08:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Exellent light, mood and composition. Because the verticals are almost vertical (we are not looking up or down), you may want to make them perfectly vertical (perspective correction); and you may want to correct the green chromatic aberration on the edge at the right. --Aristeas (talk) 18:33, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, but I agree with Aristeas, in that there are borders in various places that would ideally be edited out. I think this is a very good low-light photo, though, and the motif is interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (Switching to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per discussion below) My eyes keep drifting to that bit of boardwalk at the bottom. Looking at the location it seems possible to place the camera right at the edge of the boardwalk to capture a full reflection without any distractions. On the technical side, I subscribe to the shortcomings listed by Aristeas and would add low sharpness to the mix, seemingly caused by slight camera shake and/or diffraction. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 20:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Julesvernex2, sorry. --A.Savin 00:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Striking but barrel distortion at the top, in addition to the other problems. I will oppose if this is not fixed -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Thank you for the comments. I have uploaded a new version. I made a perspective correction and removed the chromatic aberrations. I also adjusted the cropping so that more foreground is now visible. In fact, I even tried to get closer to the water. There it was difficult to get all the reflection on the picture. Also, the front step was so half submerged, which didn't look so good, see here. The roof in the foreground is actually round. It fits exactly into the roof of the building opposite, as you can see on satellite images. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 07:04, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Ah, indeed that half submerged step spoils the reflection! The idea of matching the curvature of the foreground to the opposing roof is awesome, but I'm not sure it comes across as intentional without the accompanying explanation. One last point on technicalities: the chromatic aberration correction went overboard and left a thick orange border across the entire building. I see you use Lightroom, so would propose instead one of these corrections: i) using the Defringe tool with around 14 on the green amount and 62/84 on the green hue; or ii) using the clone stamp tool at max magnification to manually remove the green fringing. The latter produces better results but is a but time consuming. Happy to help further if useful --Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:16, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Thank you so much for your tips! I had already worked with the Defringe tool (after the automatic correction did not give good results): Now I have adopted the parameters you suggested. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 08:41, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
        • You're welcome! I still see the orange border but it's probably just a temporary cache issue --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:08, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
          • Hi Julesvernex2. That is strange. They weren't there yet during the upload. But now I have also seen them and uploaded the file again. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 09:16, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
            • Yep, can see it now! --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
            • Thank you very much, Matthias, for the new version! Perspective etc. are IMHO much better now. But I still see some orange areas at the right of the building, around the crane etc., even when I refresh the cache. That’s a pity because I really would like to support this photo. --Aristeas (talk) 08:28, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
            • Good eye, Aristeas! Matthias, when I apply the parameters above (14 on the green amount and 62/84 on the green hue) I get slightly better results (e.g., no orange borders on the right of the building) but the crane is still not perfect. I think this will require a bit of manual cloning to solve, happy to help you with this if useful --Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:05, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
              • Thank you for the tips. Thank you for the tips. I have tried to fix the problem and uploaded a new version. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In several places, the newest version has more CA than the original. Look at the bottom of the extended roof and the circular windows. I am crossing out my vote for now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:48, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentFair enough. I'm sorry for that. I am permanently working on the image. For the latest version (which I just uploaded), Aristeas supported me.--Matthias Süßen (talk) 08:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It looks like the CA on the bottom of the extended roof was replaced in part with blue, but it's all acceptable to me and the photo is beautiful, so I again support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Dear friends, please have a look at the newest version. (Most of) the purple fringing is gone. CA removal is really difficult in this case, among other reasons because the image is quite colourful and therefore some usual “replace colour” tricks etc. don’t work well. But I hope we are making progress ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 10:28, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I forgot. As the most irritating things are fixed now, I think it deserves support. --Aristeas (talk) 15:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Facially, great! But it's rather soft all around, with CA still visible in places. It looks like it was a long exposure, which might explain this, but with incomplete metadata we can't tell so I don't feel like I can fairly !vote. Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hello Daniel Case. Thank you for your comments as well. Aristeas and I were working on the .jpg last time and must have overwritten the metadata when uploading. The settings were: f/16 at ISO200 and 30 seconds exposure time. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 07:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A good effort but I just don't see FP here. Overall, the building overall seems a little too dark, wtih muddy details. While the attempt at symmetry in the water is laudable, the boardwalk is disturbing. I did a test crop without it and liked the image better. If possible, consider going back to this location and making another attempt. --GRDN711 (talk) 22:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hi GRDN711. Thank you for your comment. As I mentioned above: I tried different perspectives and decided on this one. Of course, you don't have to like it. But you should know that it was not created by chance. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 07:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    It seems that the lens correctionis not optimal. Camera raw is not so good in this point.- If you would use 20̬ percent of a BW-layer the gaudy colour are away.̥ Freddo213 (talk) 16:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:SBB Re 4-4 II and Re 6-6 above Erstfeld.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2022 at 15:41:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Re 4/4 II and a Re 6/6 haul a southbound intermodal freight train on the Gotthard line just outside Erstfeld (visible in the background), Switzerland.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:39, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Padum Zanskar View From Karsha Oct22 A7C 03984.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2022 at 15:24:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Padum tri-valley and the Zanskar mountains
  • Contre-jour. The sun is in front. What we see is the shadowy side of these mountains, with a characteristic bluish tint. Also the clouds are very bright. The problem comes from the orientation of the camera in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 11:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support On the one hand Basile is certainly right about the difficult light. On the other hand I still like the result: it’s a magnificent view and I love the transition in the valley from shadow to light. --Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 13:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I understand Basile's and Diego's points of view, but (IMHO) I still see a natural purplish sky near the incredibly beautiful mountain sunset... --Terragio67 (talk) 14:07, 2 december 2022 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Basile and Diego. I've seen a lot of clouds, blue sky and snow-capped peaks in my recent categorization work. This just does not stand out from that very large pack. Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Beautiful, but I also agree with Daniel. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:51, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:53, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:39, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#India