Commons:特色图片评选

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
COM:FPC
This project page in other languages:
Skip to current candidates 跳转至评选区
此处的图片评选区交流主要使用英语,如果需要中文交流区,请前往中文维基百科的本地评选区

特色图片评选


FPCandiateicon.svg

欢迎来到特色图片评选!社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一,即特色图片每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻,也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云:“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像,请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识,图像就会成功入选。

这里列出了特色图片的评选记录,你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片:2004年2005年, 2006年2007年2008年2009年2010年2011年2012年2013年2014年2015年2016年2017年2018年2019年2020 以及本月

关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述,请参阅我们的年度评选

规范[edit]

  • 投票周期为10天,之后的投票将无效。
  • 欢迎匿名用户提名并参与讨论。
  • 提名者可以随时撤回提名。
  • 每个注册用户都可以投票,匿名用户的票将不统计。
  • 如果提名5天后没有支持票,该提名将提前结束。
  • 通过的标准:至少5个支持票,支持票与反对票比例大于2/1。
  • 完成的投票保存在存档
  • 参见投票结束后操作指引

提名[edit]

如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像,并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可,那么请按照如下步骤操作:

1. 按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg)在下方的文本框输入图像名称,然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。

如果本次提名为第n次提名,请按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg/2)展开操作。

所有的新图片集提名页面都应按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination)进行。


2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。(注:打开编辑页面后,您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表,请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部(在本行后)”;您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士(除了顶部)”。 )

3. 点击此处并按如下格式在图片候选区顶端加入新内容:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg}}

推荐操作:COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。

可选操作:如果您不是图像的创建者,请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”(不含括号)。

注意,你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当![edit]

光暗度[edit]

Shadowtest.jpg

在讨论图像的光暗度的时候,投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示,它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个(甚至四个)圈子,那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子,你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数,故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话,也可以考虑把它打印出来。

色彩度[edit]

Colortest.png

在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图,图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合,你则须要调校你的伽玛设置(在电脑的输出设置上,而不在于屏幕显示),直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难,然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意,在液晶显示(无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕)上观看图片,你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要,请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Jekleni most pri Radečah (Iron bridge on Sava river at Radeče; IG. GRIDL fabrik, 1894).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 16:52:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Iron bridge on Sava river at Radeče

File:Pencak silat api.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 13:02:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:TRADISI MAUDU LOMPOA TAKALAR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 13:05:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Sandhill crane in flight over Llano Seco.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 11:43:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sandhill crane (Antigone canadensis) in flight over Llano Seco, Butte County, California

File:Karte baikal2.png (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 09:31:38
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Not in SVG, outdated (Ust-Orda Buryat Okrug is no longer an autonomous federal subject of Russia and is now a full part of the Irkutsk Oblast), unnecessary frame, top crop way too close to the lake, visible watermark in the bottom right corner, no legend whatsoever explaining the map's symbols, no unit for any of the summit elevations (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Visually appealing for a digital map from 16 years ago but lacking in cartographic standards -- StellarHalo (talk) 09:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist as nominated.--Peulle (talk) 12:16, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:19, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per nom. --El Grafo (talk) 15:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Claus 15:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Seven Pandas (talk) 20:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per above. --Cayambe (talk) 20:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Bernardo Bellotto - Miodowa Street in Warsaw - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 07:47:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bernardo Bellotto - Miodowa Street in Warsaw
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Towns
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Bernardo Bellotto - uploaded by Artinpl - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I am not sure about the countless small white dots at the bottom (reflections?), but overall a good reproduction of a painting with high historical value. --Aristeas (talk) 18:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Probably good historical value but the light annoys me quite a bit. Most of the things are in the shadow that doesn't excite me much. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:2018 fiji, 10 april, freeway, dwarf hawkfish (40966872195).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 06:37:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dwarf hawkfish

File:Cospudener See mit Kraftwerk Lippendorf, 1708281031, ako.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 23:28:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View over the Cospudener See
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Making an FP out of the steam from the cooling towers of a power station sounds like a tall order, but I think Code has managed it. It impressed me with the stillness of the reflections and the elegant simplicity of the composition. Created by Code - uploaded by Code - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A bit dark, and WB a bit too blue. -- King of ♥ 03:08, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd probably vote for this photo if something more than the leftmost third were cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose underexposed, main subject forms maybe 5 % of the photo area, better quality could be expected for a such static subject. —kallerna (talk) 09:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support What a smoke! I like how the reflection underlines the scale of the smoke. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:49, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Bubalus bubalis (water buffalo) bathing in a rust-colored pond and looking at viewer, head above water, Don Det, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 22:26:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bubalus bubalis (water buffalo) bathing in a rust-colored pond and looking at viewer, head above water, Don Det, Laos

File:Ferrier Fountain, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 20:24:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ferrier Fountain, Christchurch, Canterbury
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#New_Zealand
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's Ferrier Fountain in Christchurch, New Zealand. The fountain gets illuminated with bright colours, see eg. here. I think that this colour fits quite well with the sky and the colour of the trees. There are some technical shortcoming (montion blur in the trees) but I think it's acceptable. It's never really windless here... -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Have you got a shot that doesn't crop the water on the left? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @Charlesjsharp: No I don't have such a shot. I was after the lines (columns) as I didn't find the whole fountain with water that exciting - see eg. here. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Fun and interesting, but I agree with Charles it would be better if it wasn't cropped on the left. Cmao20 (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

NASA Exoplanet Exploration Halloween posters 2020[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 15:17:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

File:Champlain Quebec city.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 10:58:55
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Best image quality (Original nomination)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace File:Petit Champlain at night, Quebec city.jpg -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace with due respect to this photo, which is also beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep The existing image is better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep This crop is perfectly fit to narrow street.--Claus 13:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Ivar (talk) 14:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per my previous comments, I like the composition of the old image. -- King of ♥ 15:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace The new photo is higher quality and I am fond of the square composition. Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace This is a hard one ;–). The quality of the new one is better, but the composition is better in the old image. But we can feature just one of them, and if the author prefers the new one, I will follow him here. --Aristeas (talk) 18:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Protest in Łódź, October 2020 - 37 (cropped).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 09:36:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Protest against abortion restriction in Łódź, October 2020

File:Žumberk (Žár) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 07:52:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Žumberk, a small village
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Suisant7 -- Suisant (talk) 07:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Suisant (talk) 07:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A nice enough photo, but missing the special wow factor that would make me say that it is one of the fines images on Commons.--Peulle (talk) 08:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO very beautiful. Nice composition placing the church at an intersecting third. I thought the light was a bit dull at first but it's grown on me, the wow is subtle but it's there. Cmao20 (talk) 16:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Architecture is really not special. Flat sky and average light. Too ordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Blick vom Wachtküppel nach Nordosten.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 20:11:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

First snow on the Wasserkuppe, Hesse, Germany

File:Collier - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F261.LA978-01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 18:46:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Necklace of the Lau of Malaita

File:Martial eagle (Polemaetus bellicosus) in flight.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 13:47:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2020 -- 7824-6.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 12:27:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Valves at the switch house east at Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Cartouchière - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F169.LA1140-01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 12:11:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bandolier of the Lau of Malaita
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Jewellery
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Cephas (talk) 12:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cephas (talk) 12:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good photo; but are there jpg artefactis in the background or is it the structure of the background? There is also some color noise in the background. --Llez (talk) 15:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Llez. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Neuntöter mit erbeutetem Heupferd im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 06:57:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Hwbund - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 06:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 06:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent action shot. I nominated this one at QIC a few days ago with the idea it would make a great FP too. The two little twigs at the left could be deleted, but their presence is not a deal-breaker in my view. The light and the smooth background are very nice -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:36, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 08:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent focus, solid composition, subject has wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 08:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Basile. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 14:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great shot but it would be definitely better if the croppsed tips of branches on the left are cloned out Poco a poco (talk) 07:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support per Basile and Poco, the twigs at the left are a bit distracting. Cmao20 (talk) 15:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 22:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but per Poco. Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Pointe de Nyon (1).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 20:36:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pointe de Nyon (2019 m) in commune of Morzine, Haute-Savoie, France

File:Port de Rives in Thonon-les-Bains 06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 20:33:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Port de Rives in Thonon-les-Bains, Haute-Savoie, France
  • In case clarification is necessary for other reviewers, I see this kind of view all the time. This is nothing special to me. I don't find the composition especially impressive either - it looks like a shot any tourist in my home town could take. I don't have any issues with the technical quality.--Peulle (talk) 08:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Spurzem, great photo to me. Nice light and beautiful subject Cmao20 (talk) 11:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice subject and light but the foreground is not very interesting to look at. There is a big red box on the left, a bit of another box on the right... I'm somehow missing the composition idea. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle; it doesn't stand out from other views of sailboats docked at a marina. Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Puelle --StellarHalo (talk) 09:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:36, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:New York and Jersey City Skyline Panorama.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 14:05:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have no problems with the crops, and it's great to see both the Jersey City and Lower Manhattan skylines together (plus Ellis Island, which should get a category and be mentioned in the description). However, a lot of the buildings feel washed out to me. I feel like this was a hazy late morning, not ideal for the shoot, but I wonder whether selectively increasing saturation could help. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • I've been a lot in NY but this was an exceptional clear day. Btw the geotag is wrong, camera location can't be in lower Manhattan. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
+1 on the coords. This is the view from Liberty Island. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You know that I live in Manhattan, right? Time of day can be an issue in terms of haze, not just the day's weather. And in no way would I call that an exceptionally clear day. It's not exceedingly rare to have cloudless blue skies here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There are at least five oily spots in the sky at right. --Cayambe (talk) 23:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vertical distortion (left side), harsh contrast (in some areas the contrast is too much resulting in black solid) and finally Satured colors. Sorry --Wilfredor (talk) 00:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the idea of both skylines in one shot, but the colors here just don't work. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:WLM - 2020 - Schloss Schönbrunn - Kronprinzengarten - 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 13:10:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crown Prince Garden, Schönbrunn Palace, Vienna, Austria
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by User:Moahim - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the dramatic streaming clouds and the way they echo the shapes below make this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Despite the clouds a bit too dull light for me, sorry. The crane is also annoying and I feel like it could be cloned out well, though for a support from me this still would not suffice. --A.Savin 14:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I guess I'm the only one who likes this. I'll leave this nomination up until probably tonight Eastern Standard Time and then withdraw if there are no supporting votes. I'm surprised, but we react differently to what we see, and that's natural. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it, it's very dramatic. Cmao20 (talk) 11:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great composition and clouds. -- King of ♥ 15:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'd also clone out the crane --Llez (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment User:Moahim's last contribution was on September 29, so we should assume we have to take this photo as it is, at least for now, though it wouldn't be a shock if Moahim shows up. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:The Arcades, Christchurch, New Zealand 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 12:47:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Arcades, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You're welcome. I enjoy the shape and the light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (2).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 12:12:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Little Venice from the rue de Turenne bridge in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). Gzen92 [discuter] 12:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gzen92 [discuter] 12:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad light: the houses are in the shadow and the sky is too bright. —kallerna (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I understand, I adjusted light tones and dark tones. Is it better ? Thanks. Gzen92 [discuter] 07:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty and good quality but the light is still dull. I assume you were shooting in the direction of the sun, which never quite works. Cmao20 (talk) 11:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kallerna and Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Juan de Mata y San Félix de Valois, Bratislava, Eslovaquia, 2020-02-01, DD 78.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 12:18:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of St John of Matha, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I really feel shrunk on both sides. Very tight crop. Possible more space around? -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks for the nom MB-one! I had to get close to the church to photograph it, taking a shot with 30 cables wasn't an option. Will upload a new version with a more "natural" look later today Poco a poco (talk) 15:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose With this much distortion, this one should not be a QI. Even without the distortion, I fail to be amazed of the photo. Just a church facade. —kallerna (talk) 15:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Heavy distortion, shade divides the facade in two, very tight crop - this is not among the finest on Commons. --Ivar (talk) 15:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment New version uploaded with more crop on both sides and adjustments of perspective and aspect ratio Poco a poco (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The framing is still too cramped after minor change -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:17, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Beautiful place, good quality and the distortion is really not that bad, I'm not sure why there are so many complaints about it. But the shade falling across the left of the facade is a bit distracting. Maybe would have been better at a different time of day. Cmao20 (talk) 07:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 08:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 18:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Very weak oppose I don't mind the distortion, but I do mind the shade. Daniel Case (talk) 17:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Knoblauch (Allium sativum)-20200621-RM-085344.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 11:26:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • No, it's the start of a knot-tying demo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Bergtocht van Guarda via Ardez en Ftan naar Scuol. 20-09-2019. (d.j.b) 10.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 05:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A decorative and funny door knocker. With wear spots in the paint layer. The shadow effect gives the photo an added value for me. Guarda was awarded (the Wakker Prize) for the preservation of its architectural heritage in 1975.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support My father used to photograph door knockers in many countries, therefore I know many of them. This one would have been a showpiece for his collection ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Oversaturated, highlights/shadows adjusted too much, no wow. The light is also too harsh. —kallerna (talk) 11:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful object, beautiful colors and good quality; very good for me -- Spurzem (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Harsh shadows and light spoil it in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely colours and textures in the wood Cmao20 (talk) 07:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kallerna. Daniel Case (talk) 15:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Cmao20 --Llez (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:PK Thatta asv2020-02 img03 Shah Jahan Mosque.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 01:54:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dome interior, Shah Jahan Mosque, Thatta

File:Goodyera repens flowers in detail - Männiku.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 19:30:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Creeping lady's-tresses
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Very tiny flowers of Creeping lady's-tresses, focus stacked of 46 images. The background is sky through the trees. All by Ivar (talk) 19:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful light, nice natural background. The DoF could have been more consistent, still enough crispy sharp areas to appreciate currently -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 01:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive, considering the size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Definitely unsharp even on 12 MPx and some CA all across the plant (reflexion). But i like thia back color, much better than that light green. --Mile (talk) 07:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unsharp if this was a photo of large flowers, but they are tiny Mile. Please have another look. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Charlesjsharp I still think stack could be better, i have one in a similar size, manual shots before stack, the flower was on the hill (windy-moving). Unless pic was scaled-up !? APS-C might not be best for small macros. --Mile (talk) 11:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @PetarM: Nothing was upscaled. All my Nikon images tends to be a bit soft and usually additional sharpening is added. "Definitely unsharp" is imho very harsh assessment. --Ivar (talk) 12:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Ivar Maybe i should say "sharp enough", but stack could be done more appropriate. --Mile (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • I may be missing something here, but the description implies these flowers are 5 x 7mm, but yours are 30 x 30mm Mile. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:14, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Charlesjsharp My whole flower was 30×30 mm, all that sqaured size. Means each white blossom was under 10mm. I suppose Ivar gave a blossom size, not the complete size of the flower we are looking at ? --Mile (talk) 16:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Mile: You are comparing quite flat inflorescence with the one that has hairy flowers. 9 stacked images versus 46, they are not quite comparable. --Ivar (talk) 16:25, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Ivar We won't get far here. But you gave me a mission, I will try to find this flower in soon future. I will try to reaffirm my objectives here. Maybe I will fail too, but let's have a try. --Mile (talk) 16:45, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Mile: Face-smile.svg You need to wait at least for the next summer to find this rare species in Slovenia. Good luck with that! Anyway, the asessment "Definitely unsharp" is imo not competent. --Ivar (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Thats OK, i put this on Bookmark and see habitat, Central Europe too. --Mile (talk) 19:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 09:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Mile, this kind of shots have limited wow to me, therefore I really expect crispy sharpness, which unfortunately isn't the case here Poco a poco (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine considering the flowers are very small. I don't think it's really that unsharp at all. Cmao20 (talk) 07:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 19:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Tallinna Tööstushariduskeskus 005-omblusklass pano.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 16:54:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

360° view on the Tallinn Industrial Education Centre sewing class

File:Tallinna Teeninduskool 009-kokalabor pano.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 16:45:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

360° view on the Tallinn School of Service cook's laboratory

Church of St Sebastian, Ponta Delgada[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 09:25:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Church of St Sebastian, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal. The church, built between 1531 and 1547, is one of the landmarks of the capital of the island. I propose these images as a set because I believe that each of them deserves the FP star alone and because the set depicts this beautiful church from different viewpoints giving a comprehensive view of it (3rd criteria "A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints"). Note that there is already a closer look of the high altar that became FP and could have been added to this set. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Interested to see how this set is interpreted. For me, the images, high quality as they are, do not depict 'the same subject from different viewpoints'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
    The subject is the church and I offer different view of parts of it Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In the exterior image there is a car that is distracting and the "General view of the interior." there is a problem of distortion of the verticals, the upper part is stretched towards the sides (check the verticality of the columns) --Wilfredor (talk) 12:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Wilfredor: I reworked the image of the exterior view: the van is gone, I also improved the verticals. I've also made some adjusments of the interior view and added one additional image of the interior looking from the altar back to the entrance. Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Almost everything is fine but "General view of the nave back from the altar." has the same problem now fixed in "General view of the interior.", please, fix it too and I will support it. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 21:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Wilfredor: I had already anticipated this feedback and rework the second interior image before I added it to the set, but I made now some additional adjustments. --Poco a poco (talk) 09:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Sigo observando el problema de las columnas en "General view of the nave back from the altar.", la parte superior de las columnas esta inclinada hacia afuera, esto es fácilmente corregible usando las guías en Photoshop. --Wilfredor (talk) 15:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Wilfredor: ¿¿cómo lo ves ahora?? si sigo sin atinar, ¿podrías añadir una nota? Poco a poco (talk) 18:09, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support IMHO Good now --Wilfredor (talk) 19:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Distortion quite strong on the first image, looks like the tower is falling down. --Ivar (talk) 12:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Ivar: I readjusted the perspective of the tower Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Imho it's not fixable, because shooting point was too close to the church. --Ivar (talk) 18:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • I was Ivar, indeed as far as I could and I also took the side further from the tower. The church is in the middle of the city and there are usually tons of people walking around specially visiting bars or restaurants nearby. I could manage this shot without people thank you patience and COVID-19. Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Amazing images, on the whole. I really like all three interior views and I think they should definitely be FP. The exterior isn't so clear for me, the van is distracting and I agree with Ivar that the tower looks like it's falling backwards. Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Cmao20: as mentioned above I addressed the mentioned issues of the external image Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks, I mean honestly it's an amazing set and I'm not going to quibble any further. Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The last two photos are unreservedly FPs to me. I'm not as sure about the rest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I like all the photos and IMHO at least the first (now) and the two last really deserve the star, but I am not sure about the set idea. --Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The black point should be made more intense, especially on the first image which looks washed out. -- King of ♥ 15:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
    @King of Hearts: I've adjusted the darker areas, please, have a look Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 20:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Tropidolaemus wagleri, Wagler's palm pit viper - Takua Pa District, Phang-nga Province (48238132136).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 08:55:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wagler's palm pit viper

File:Une tartiflette sortie du four.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 08:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info nominated by Benoît Prieur -- --Benoît (d) 08:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- --Benoît (d) 08:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharp and appetizing-looking photo of the tartiflette. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No reason to have assymetic and 'tilted' tile pattern. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support per Ikan but I also take Charles' points. Cmao20 (talk) 13:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose no wow. Kruusamägi (talk) 16:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Looks very yummy and certainly good photographic quality, but per Charlesjsharp and Kruusamägi. --MB-one (talk) 12:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose +1. --Peulle (talk) 21:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 16:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Tūranga (library), Christchurch City, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 07:23:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tūranga (library), Christchurch City, New Zealand
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#New_Zealand
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's Tūranga, a new public library in Christchurch, New Zealand. The old one was destroyed during the earthquakes. It's usually quite busy around so I'm quite pleased that I managed to take this shot without cars and people. -- Podzemnik (talk) 07:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 07:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I may be a lone dissenter, but the front of the building feels too in-your-face to me. The right side has a decent rhythm and I like the design on the bottom right of the front, but I just find the building in general upsetting to view and not part of a great composition, although I'm of course happy that a new public library was constructed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The more I look at it the more that cropped tree on the left bothers me. Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I've come back to this several times, and I really want to support it, but Daniel Case has a point about the tree. The library building and the hotel next to it work well together. I wish that you could've walked just a few steps to the right to avoid that tree, while keeping the hotel on the right side. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 22:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Plagiodontes daedaleus f. minor 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 07:06:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A shell of Plagiodontes daedaleus forma minor
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Odontostomidae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not really colorful like many of the shells you've photographed, but very nice details and very impressive, considering its size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Not so colourful, but have a look at the teeth! --Llez (talk) 10:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, boring colours, but amazing internal detail. What is the purpose of the 'teeth'? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I suppose that it is an protection against predators, when the animal is retracted in the shell. In contrary to many sea and freshwater snails, most of he land snails lack an operculum, which has amongst others the same function. At any rate these teeth are very useful for taxonomists, for their arrangement (different in every species) helps to identify the species ;-). --Llez (talk) 11:59, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 23:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:45, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Jeanette Scissum at Marshall Space Flight Center.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 00:02:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jeanette Scissum
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NASA/MSFC - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 02:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice photo of someone I wish I had already known about. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Not an FP. Moon dominates and the file cabinet on the right is highly distracting. Face is not well lit. Seven Pandas (talk) 22:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Seven Pandas. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
    • @Seven Pandas, Daniel Case: I'm confused about the month-old face comment. She is African-American, and the photo was shot a little overexposed to try and get more detail in her face with the filmstock of the time, so I think it's as all-out as it could have been. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
@Adam Cuerden:Her face doesn't bother me; I know we're asserting the main value of the image is historic. But ... I think SP had a point about how, if she's the basis for nominating the image for FP, it really works as one if she's only a quarter of the total image and not the most prominent thing in it. Daniel Case (talk) 16:56, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. This would make a wonderful VI and probably a good FP at en.wikipedia, but I wouldn't call this a top-notch environmental portrait. --El Grafo (talk) 09:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Seven Pandas --StellarHalo (talk) 09:46, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Steuerhaus, Memmingen, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 90.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2020 at 21:10:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Steuerhaus, Memmingen, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Steuerhaus, Memmingen, Germany. The building dates from 1494/1495 and was created for the administration of the finances of the city. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have the feeling that some people at the left are distorted (stretched horizontally), caused by the wide angle objective, also the arch at the right. --Llez (talk) 06:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
    Llez I applied an aspect ratio adjustment, looks better now, thanks, Poco a poco (talk) 08:47, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice, and the forward-and-back motion is helped by the wicker chairs. Side point: It's funny that there are no flags in the flagpoles. In the U.S., there would be, but I understand the different historical consciousness of Germany. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Complicated! Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 11:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan, a really nice colourful photo. Cmao20 (talk) 13:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. It's also faintly nostalgic to see people sitting in groups at tables right next to other people in groups sitting at tables ... Daniel Case (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I've looked at this a few times now, and I don't understand what's so special about it that it should warrant FP status.--Peulle (talk) 10:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Peulle. —kallerna (talk) 11:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle. --MB-one (talk) 12:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle and right crop doesn't work for me. --Ivar (talk) 13:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:28, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Boring sky, and not special enough, per others. Incidentally, visible distorsions among the people -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Georgios Ntaviotis & Daniel Souček, U21 CZE-GRE 2019-10-10.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2020 at 19:00:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Georgios Ntaviotis and Daniel Souček in an internatinoal association football match of European Under-21 Championship Qualifying Round between the Czech Republic and Greece
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Association football (soccer)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 19:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- T.Bednarz (talk) 19:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The scene doesn't speak for itself (why does the guy in the white shirt appear to be shouting at his hand, and why is the other guy not interested in the ball?). Also, the motion blur, on the hand and the ball, detracts from the image rather than adding to it. --Bobulous (talk) 19:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm sorry, but once you read Bobulous's !vote you can't take the picture seriously (In any event, regardless of the outcome of this, I think the image would benefit greatly from being cropped in from the left as that part of it adds nothing). Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I was going to suggest you nominate this image instead, but realised rather late that it has already been awarded FP status. That is a striking image. --Bobulous (talk) 19:45, 26 October 2020 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Beilstein - Burg Hohenbeilstein und Unteres Schloss - Ansicht vom Birkenweg mit Abendsonne.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2020 at 19:35:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the Birkenweg to Hohenbeilstein Castle (on the top of the hill) and to the so-called Unteres Schloss
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It was not easily possible to use a tripod (I took this photo standing on a parking place, people and cars cruising around me ;–), I wanted f/10 to get enough DoF at 94mm, and so I selected ISO 400 to get 1/125 s in order to avoid camera shake. --Aristeas (talk) 07:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • IMO it would be nothing wrong about using, for example, f/7.3 and 1/50 sec exposure. Tripod? For god's sake, a Sony A7Rx user hardly ever needs a tripod ;-) --A.Savin 13:02, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I will provide a version with noise reduction in the sky as soon as possible (hopefully tomorrow or at Monday), but at the moment I am working hard as a member of the jury for WLM 2020/DE and can’t do any photo editing ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 07:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New version with less noise uploaded. @Aristeas: Please revert, if it's not meeting Your expectations. --Ivar (talk) 08:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @Iifar: Thank you very mich for helping out! (Maybe I will take the freedom to upload my own de-noised version created from the RAW file next week, but your version is definitely a good improvement, I will take it as a measure for my own attempt.) --Aristeas (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Appealing light, interesting architecture. Assuming no tripod was taken, the settings seem consistent to me (minor noise in the sky, honestly not a deal-breaker in my view). High resolution and appropriate DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you very much, Cmao20, for nominating and all of you for your comments and support. --Aristeas (talk) 07:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 09:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • This one, FF, paid some 2000, but ISO 400 migth be problem. A.Savin !? --Mile (talk) 11:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In Ivar's version well fixed, thanks. --A.Savin 13:02, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose None of the three buildings is large enough in the scene to keep the attention, so it feels like the three buildings together define the composition, and the way they're laid out doesn't feel balanced. Also, the way the trees suddenly burst in to obscure the building at the bottom-left makes it feel even less balanced. Lighting and detail are excellent, but the arrangement just doesn't fit together for me. --Bobulous (talk) 19:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'd like more space at the bottom --Llez (talk) 06:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I understand your wish very well, but the problem is that at the bottom there are some very ugly modern buildings which would spoil the image … Next week I will have a look at the RAW file if I can rescue some more pixels at the bottom, but we cannot do much, sorry. --Aristeas (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Friedhof ohlsdorf november 2019 30.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2020 at 16:23:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hamburg, cemetery Ohlsdorf, memorial for the civilian casualties in WW2, entrance
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice, a really arty composition with beautiful light. Cmao20 (talk) 19:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree. Really good, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very beautiful indeed, but the bright part looks unnatural. It is totally OK for the sun to be blown out. We shouldn't resort to fake highlight recovery to artificially suppress the brightness of the sky when the color information just isn't there. -- King of ♥ 22:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support KoH is right, but I still love the composition and light. ;–) Sidenote: It’s a pity and I do not understand why this photo did not pass the pre-jury for WLM 2020 :–(. But the pre-jury is always somewhat tricky … and always kills a few of the best submissions. --Aristeas (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
    @Aristeas: Thanks for the sidenote! Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 16:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I love the scene, but why is the metalwork so much softer and lighter in the areas where the sky is seen? --Bobulous (talk) 19:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mosbatho (talk) 20:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Like King of ♥, I like everything about the image except for the unnatural glow and sudden decrease in sharpness in the upper right corner of the gate. --MB-one (talk) 12:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose what have you done to the top right of the gate Dirtsc? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp: I tried a rework, but didn't want to change the original. Please tell me, if you think the version File:Friedhof ohlsdorf november 2019 30a.jpg might be better. I'm not quite happy with the new version yet, because it is darker than the original. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  • I see more artefacts. Sometimes you just cannot recover overexposed areas. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Indeed. I am saying that the bright area should be even brighter than it is right now. -- King of ♥ 15:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri borealis) male Jaipur 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2020 at 13:23:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri borealis) male near Jaipur

File:Laila Peak.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2020 at 12:56:01
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Nice view, but far below today's FP and QI standards. --A.Savin 12:56, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Ivar (talk) 17:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --StellarHalo (talk) 19:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Pretty, but tiny. Give me twice this resolution and I'd vote to keep. Cmao20 (talk) 19:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I feel like we should keep really good or striking small pictures from the early digital photography age as historical. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Below 2 MP. A landscape would have to be in the 2-4 MP range for me to say "I wouldn't vote for this now, but I wouldn't delist it either." -- King of ♥ 22:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Slightly underexposed (sky), and the WB seems too warm, but the main issue is definitely the size. In years 2000-2001 I remember I was among the first to own a digital camera, working with floppy disks (almost this model). Maximum resolution 0.35 Mpx 🔬😭 Nice gadget at these old times to avoid developing the photos on paper before inserting them in university reports, however I really don't think any of these documents would have ever made a great image. Even at this period it was very clear the quality was disappointingly low compared to the standards -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Per Ikan Kekek. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful delist If there were some way we could at least recognize the independently commendable elements (the composition and lighting), I wish we could. In those areas it could certainly serve as an example to emulate.Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist I am not swayed by Ikan's arguments; there is no such category as far as I'm aware, and this image doesn't meet the current FP bar, imo.--Peulle (talk) 21:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If historical digital photos can't be grandfathered in, why vote? Someone should create a bot that will automatically remove FP status from all photos below 2MP and run it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Points well taken, but why not do this kind of delisting with a bot? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • I guess I do think that there should be some kind of acknowledgement of good pioneering use of the new digital technology, but if we want to revoke the FP status of everything under 2MP, a bot should be created and run. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:07, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • As for me, the photo is also a bit short on wow side, although it of course may have been considered unusual at the timepoint of promotion. But meanwhile we have lots of impressive mountain views, and I'm also not quite sure if the upright format is the best one for this scenery. That said, I still think what should be delisted is not to be decised via bot, but needs consensus instead. --A.Savin 16:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Ancien hôtel des Postes de Charleroi (DSC 0278).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2020 at 07:22:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ancien hôtel des Postes (Charleroi, Belgium)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info by -- Trougnouf (talk) 07:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Trougnouf (talk) 07:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks like a good QI, but I'm not really wowed by the light or the motif, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 09:00, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I agreed with Peulle at first but looking at it some more the soft light and the beautiful clouds have won me over. Support is only weak because I feel it is a little bit oversharpened and there is a little colour noise. Cmao20 (talk) 19:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done more denoising, less sharpening. Thank you ! --Trougnouf (talk) 17:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The clouds radiating from the center really enhance the composition. -- King of ♥ 22:30, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this. The lighting is subtle but the main building still has a luminosity which makes it stand out against its surroundings. The composition works for me: just the right amount of sky above the tower, and just about as much empty pavement showing below as is viable, and a clear view of the main building without obstruction or distraction. Detail is sharp at full screen (34" 4K) and sufficient at 100%. --Bobulous (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Chute Montmorency3.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2020 at 00:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Montmorency Falls

File:Green karst peaks seen from the top of Mount Nam Xay a sunny morning during the monsoon Vang Vieng Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2020 at 23:56:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Green karst peaks seen from the top of Mount Nam Xay a sunny morning during the monsoon Vang Vieng Laos
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Have another look, Basile, it does not look crispy sharp to me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Charles J Sharp, sharp like your honeycomb I think. If not "crispy" then normally sharp. But look, you have two nominations currently, this honeycomb measuring 3,415 × 3,415 pixels, and a moth sized 4,422 × 2,948 pixels. Your buzzard archived yesterday measured 2,600 x 4,000 pixels, and your chameleon last week 3,785 × 2,523 pixels. Now this is how detailed this landscape appears when downsized or cropped to 4'422 px large, like the biggest of your 4 last candidatures. The autofocus was set, certainly the limit of the camera was reached. More sharpness would mean over-sharpened in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • I was reacting to your dismissing the oppose vote with the 'crispy' adjective. I wouldn't dream of comparing the absolute sharpness of my hand-held photos using a enthusiast-level crop-frame body and a hand-held 400mm lens in average light conditions with your professional-level full-frame body and tripod with the option of testing out various settings. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:34, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:25, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support of course --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 10:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very beautiful landscape and the sharpness looks fine to me. Cmao20 (talk) 06:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Majestic. -- King of ♥ 22:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:21, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice scenery, sharpness clearly OK. --A.Savin 13:19, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good composition and exposure, and a nice sense of depth delivered by the low angle of the sun. Detail is sharp at full screen (34" 4K) and sufficient at 100%. The clouds and the colours and the rugged terrain make for a striking scene. --Bobulous (talk) 19:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:54, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support due to sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 07:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Sugarloaf Mountain with the cloud on top.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2020 at 21:53:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sugarloaf Mountain with the cloud on top
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded Donatas Dabravolskas - nominated by -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 21:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 21:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The quality is not perfect but this is a really amazing sight. Cmao20 (talk) 10:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice, but wb seems to slightly off. —kallerna (talk) 15:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A very striking scene, especially with the lines of cables partially disappearing within the cloud. The peak does appear starkly darker and more saturated than the rest of the rock, but I'm guessing this might be because it's above cloud level and less affected by moisture haze. The composition is good, the exposure fitting, and the warm colour seems right to me given how low the sun must be to cast shadows like that. --Bobulous (talk) 19:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not impressed by composition or quality. Should not be any need to crop (or it may be downsized). Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Not sure about the WB, especially given this picture taken by the same photographer at the same time. Daniel Case (talk) 23:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Duplicate picture (see metadata of both, e.g. unique ID). The other version was uploaded 5 Sep 2019 as part of WLM, the now nominated version -- on 16 Jul 2020 as part of WLE. Interesting strategy... --A.Savin 12:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
    A.Savin: Good point, but in the case this image had made it to the final of WLE 2020 in Brazil it would have been disqualified as we expect images that had not been uploaded before (that includes of course derivative works!). FYI Donatas Dabravolskas. Otherwise I agree with Charles and I find the original WB more realistic, therefore Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poco a poco (talk) 17:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Podzemnik (talk) 19:46, 28 October 2020 (UTC)