Commons:特色靚相候選

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:FPC Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−

呢度係成為特色靚相嘅候選區。請留意呢度唔係同每日靚相一樣。

要知道之前有乜提名，睇睇：Commons:等色靚相/紀錄

正式嘅事物[edit]

提名[edit]

如果您認為您已經創作或搵到一張可能有價值的圖片，請將佢加到「提名」部分嘅最頂部。用呢個連結加入。

喺您提名之前，請肯定已經喺相應的圖片加上適當嘅版權標籤。

請喺投票嘅時候利用您嘅語言或者使用下面嘅模板：

  • 支持 - Support, Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, ...
  • 反對 - Oppose, No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, ...

另外，您亦可以使用模板{{Oppose}}同{{Support}}

您亦可以表達使用{{I love}}代表您喜歡呢張圖片或您想利用{{Neutral}}嚟表達您嘅睇法。

特色靚相候選方針[edit]

  • 14 日投票持間。結果將會喺提名後嘅第 15 日公佈決定。
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅提名
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅討論貢獻
  • 匿名貢獻者嘅投票不作計算
  • 提名者不會計作票數。必須另作解釋作出支持。
  • 記住，Wikimedia Commons 計劃嘅目標係提供一個中央式嘅檔案庫，以提供所有 Wikimedia 計劃(包括未來的計劃)裏使用。呢個唔只係於置 Wikipedia 嘅圖片，因此呢啲圖片唔係只針對嗰個計劃作出決定。

要成功登上特色靚相，必須合乎以下嘅條件。

  • 合理嘅牌照 (當然)
  • 最少 5 張支持票
  • 支持／反對嘅比例最少為 2:1 (三分二多數，即最少 67% 支持)

有關點樣處理舊嘅提名，睇睇Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished。

更新呢一頁：purge this page's cache

提名[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Musk Lorikeet - Goulds Lagoon Wildlife Sanctuary.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2021 at 17:00:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Indian Farmers' Protest by Ravan Khosa 37.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2021 at 12:16:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Three protestors at the 2020-2021 Indian Farmers' Protest
@Aristeas: Oh, I didn't realize that. I will withraw one of those nominations. Thanks for your help. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Abtei Seckau Basilika Kreuzigungsgruppe 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2021 at 08:18:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Romanesque crucifixion group at Seckau Basilica, Styria, Austria

File:Church of the Saviour, Beijing.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2021 at 06:02:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Saviour, Beijing
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#China
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ZhengZhou - uploaded by ZhengZhou - nominated by ZhengZhou -- ZhengZhou (talk) 06:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ZhengZhou (talk) 06:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Interesting motif and welcome to FPC! But can you explain why you think this is one of the very best photos on Commons? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sure. This is a clear image of the church, a rare nexus connecting catholic religion (western culture) and the Chinese, on a nice day. You can see two beautiful Chinese pavilions with yellow tiles (only the emperor's family were allowed to use yellow tiles in China'a feudal eras) in front of the magnificent Gothic architecture. I think contrast and fusion of this image are amazing as they reflect the equally interesting history behind this building. ZhengZhou (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Mitsubishi Ki-21 under attack on airfield.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2021 at 23:21:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1950
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by w:USAF - uploaded by Cobatfor - nominated by Sadopaul -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 23:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 23:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Quality isn't great for a wwii photo. There's a weird border at left, watermark in the bottom left corner, sharpness is underwhelming, and the aircraft is cut off at bottom. I'm willing to excuse a lot for historically valuable photographs but this isn't FP in my opinion. Buidhe (talk) 02:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Isdera Autobahnkurier Classic-Gala 2021 1X7A0228.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2021 at 20:05:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Ada Bridge pylon (Sava river, Belgrade).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2021 at 10:09:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ada Bridge pylon (Sava river, Belgrade)

File:Madagascar stonechat (Saxicola sibilla) male.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2021 at 08:40:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Madagascar stonechat (Saxicola sibilla) male

File:Indian Farmers' Protest by Ravan Khosa 08.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2021 at 07:03:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Farmers from Haryana at 2020-21 Indian Farmers' Protest
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ravan Khosa - uploaded by - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is actually quite good. I like the light and the sharpness, and in terms of being a portrait of the man on the right, it's excellent. What bothers me here, though, is the composition. The man on the right is in focus, but cropped. The man in the background is out of focus, which in itself is fine, but also takes up more space in the frame than the man in the front.--Peulle (talk) 08:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good lighting. Beautiful colors (love it). But I'm wondering what happened to the left arm of the farmer on the right? Why wasn't it included in the shot? —  Băng Tỏa  11:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The photo depicts a protest, so it makes sense to center it around the raised arms of both men. It's a good photo, but it has some technical problems (focus, distracting background). —capmo (talk) 13:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The man in the back is too out-of-focus to be a subject, but too in-focus to blend seamlessly into the background, and thus just ends up as a distraction. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Thank you. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Bergeralm im Sommer 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2021 at 06:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bergeralm, Tyrol, Austria in the summer - water reservoir for artificial snow with restaurant in the background
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 06:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 06:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful. What's the blue thing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
    • The blue thing is part of the artificial snow production stuff. I don't fully understand it, but I think water gets pumped out of the reservoir and distributed through this thing. --Kritzolina (talk) 06:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a lovely scene, but considering the resolution, I don't think the level of sharpness is good enough for it to be called one of the finest landscape photos on Commons.--Peulle (talk) 08:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment That's a very reasonable point of view. I'll think about it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMHO a beautiful panorama with very peaceful mood. (Disclosure: I am perhaps somewhat biased because I have edited this picture a little bit for QI ;–). But I would not have done so if I would not think that this is a beautiful photo.) --Aristeas (talk) 17:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me, it's good enough.--Alexander-93 (talk) 20:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm trying to understand what are those horizontal lines in the mountain right above the house. It can't be terraces, or can it? —capmo (talk) 04:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Protection against avalanches and / or mudslides. --Kritzolina (talk) 06:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:13, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:33, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:33, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Common darter (Sympetrum striolatum) female.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2021 at 22:43:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common darter (Sympetrum striolatum) female
  • Thanks. Focus stacking is like taking down the Christmas decorations. However hard you look, there is always something left which others spot right away. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Lake of Fusine.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2021 at 18:43:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lake of Fusine.jpg
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Commonists - uploaded by Commonists - nominated by Commonists -- Commonists 18:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain -- Commonists 18:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The right corner is missing. Instead of trying to fill it in Photoshop, I would just crop the top, since compositionally there is too much sky anyways. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
    ups 😝...sorry. Better? Thank you --Commonists 20:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice, tranquil scene, though perhaps a little bit oversharpened. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:35, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The thumbnail didn't get my attention, but when I zoomed in, wow! We can see the fish in the foreground as well as all those people in the background that I wasn't even aware of. —capmo (talk) 01:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Capmo. Overall a very nice panorama. --Aristeas (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Per King. a little over-processed.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Even if I weren't bothered by the unnatural appearance that results from the oversharpening, this is not among the best images of this kind of scene. The thin clouds do the sky no favors, and the landscape across the lake is unremarkable to me—I live near where I can take pictures of views like this (and I don't consider that image FP-level). It's possible there might be something with wow of this lake, but this isn't it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Indian Farmers' Protest by Ravan Khosa 45.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2021 at 15:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A farmer with folded hands at the 2020-21 Indian Farmers' Protest
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ravan Khosa - uploaded by Satdeep Gill - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very good portrait but the eyes should be sharp.--Ermell (talk) 21:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose DOF shallow. The nose is in focus but the eyes and fingers aren't. Seven Pandas (talk) 00:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good composition. The face, beard and one of the eyes are in focus. Sometimes we can't have it all... —capmo (talk) 01:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • My frustration with FPC when it comes to pictures of protests/social movements is well documented at this point. Typically, the conditions at an event like a demonstration aren't compatible with traditional notions of technical photography applied, on average, here. This nomination is interesting in that it says it's from the Indian farmers' protests, but it seems removed from any protest activity -- more of a portrait studio set up to take pictures of protesters. Because it's just a person on black background, the picture doesn't tell a story of the protest. It's a portrait of a farmer. That said, while personally I wish this were more visually contextualized, I'm still going to Symbol support vote.svg Support as a good portrait (though I'd probably cut off maybe 20% of the black space at the top). — Rhododendrites talk |  04:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It must be a whole lot easier to get the F number right and use much higher ISO on the R6 body (to make sure the eyes are in focus) than in one of your wildlife shots. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The nearer eye is in focus; I don't mind the shallow DoF. This is a very well done portrait, full of emotion on his face. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Valuable picture that is IMO worth a feature, despite the described flaws. Thanks for analysis and explanation by Rhododendrites. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The good composition and the strong expression we can see here for me overcomes the technical not-perfection. --Kritzolina (talk) 05:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Expressive portrait with beautiful soft light/shadows, reminding me of some paintings. --Aristeas (talk) 06:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 12:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Focus is on the near eye. Absolutely typical in portrait photography taken from side or an angle for the far eye to be somewhat out of focus. This is not a "flaw". The lighting and colours are very good. -- Colin (talk) 12:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think in this type of portrait, the emotional effect on the viewer is the most important thing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Colin --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others, this is an excellent portrait. --El Grafo (talk) 11:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the difference in focus between the eyes is a metaphor for this man's situation, that drew him top protest. Daniel Case (talk) 14:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Holy Cross church in Rottweil (9).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2021 at 15:32:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Holy Cross church in Rottweil, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

File:Св. Никола Маврово.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2021 at 12:13:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The submerged St. Nicholas Church in Mavrovo
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Daniela Stefanoska - uploaded by Daniela Stefanoska - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm on the fence about this one. On one hand, it's a striking image that caught my attention. I hadn't heard of this place before, so wasn't sure if this was a unique moment (a flood, for example) or whether the building is just always submerged (the latter appears to be true). Certainly different from the typical church exterior shots we get. :) Technically, there are shortcomings. Beyond the pixel peeping stuff like the CA on the steeple, the composition feels too heavy on the right and too empty on the bottom. All in all, I still find myself neutral for the time being... — Rhododendrites talk |  22:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I actually like this a lot, obviously for the WoW factor, but also for the smaller details like the clouds and the texture of the water. --Kritzolina (talk) 05:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, good composition and striking image. (Parenthetically, we're going to have to get used to these kinds of photos in this age of global warming, even though that's not what caused this flooding.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose I'm sorry but for me the fact of the building being partially submerged does not give it enough wow. Maybe with less dull light it might work. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Just as a counterpoint, I felt like the somber light helped produce an appropriate mood for the subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good points have been made pro and contra, I am undecided. — I have tried to edit the photo a little bit to remove the most prominent CAs and to give it a touch of more light; you can take a look at the result, if you want. Is it better? --Aristeas (talk) 09:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Here are some pictures of the same church in summer and winter when it's not submerged. The submergence is caused by the increased water level of Mavrovo Lake as a result of the snowmelt from the surrounding mountains during spring.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Carpocoris purpureipennis fifth instar nymph[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2021 at 12:07:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Top view

  • Bottom view

File:Imambara inside the Residency-Lucknow-Uttar Pradesh-DSC 0001.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2021 at 06:03:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Roofless ruined Imambara inside Lucknow Residency
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dey.sandip - uploaded by Dey.sandip - nominated by Dey.sandip -- Dey.sandip (talk) 06:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 06:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Soft all-around, overexposed portions, distracting wires in front. Also leaning in, which should be corrected unless intentionally exaggerated for artistic effect. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Moderate Symbol support vote.svg Support OK on the wires, but I'm supporting this in view of the discussion on the talk page about the difference between Commons FPC and other nomination pages. It's really not that soft and I don't see any obvious overexposure, but I feel the somewhat worn monumental space so much that I can practically smell it, and I think the non-perspective-corrected composition is fine and might be less interesting if it were perspective-corrected. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I find the uncorrected perspective disturbing.--Ermell (talk) 22:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support per ikan — Rhododendrites talk |  22:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Nidarosdom 1857.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2021 at 22:21:41
Nidaros Cathedral (1857)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Resolution is under 1 MP. Yes, it's an old image, but it doesn't appear that this digital scan has exhausted the full analog resolution of the photograph, so this is far from the best possible version of it. This photograph is not so iconic that we should consider it one of our best from that era, when the resolution is taken into account. (Original nomination, prior delist nom)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd note that the original nomination only passed 6-3, which wouldn't pass nowadays, but how big was the original print? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
    I tried to find other copies of this online, but could not find any larger ones. I'm not sure on the physical size but it definitely looks like more detail could be extracted from a better scan since every pixel is pin-sharp. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist That makes sense. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist The reasons given against delisting in the previous delist nom are really outlandish. Of course it’s a very interesting photo of that church, so if we just could get a better reproduction/scan … --Aristeas (talk) 06:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Radomianin (talk) 18:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Peulle (talk) 08:45, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Daniel Case (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Lyndon Johnson Richard Nixon 1968.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2021 at 08:50:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lyndon Johnson meets with Presidential candidate Richard Nixon at the White House, July 26, 1968.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1960-1970
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Lyndon Johnson meets with Presidential candidate Richard Nixon at the White House, July 26, 1968. Taken by en:Yoichi Okamoto - uploaded by Soerfm - nominated by A. C. Santacruz -- A. C. Santacruz (talk) 08:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- A. C. Santacruz (talk) 08:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting foreground. Also crop too tight on both sides, and the heavy grain doesn't help -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The out-of-focus chair in the foreground splits the image apart. Also, it seems to have a digital color noise pattern which I've never seen on a film photo before. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:35, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as above. --Mile (talk) 09:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The distracting chair in the foreground. --Cayambe (talk) 20:19, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support That the chair sticks out between them is kind of the point of the story of the photo. Johnson was on his way out; Nixon was coming in. Their politics could barely be more different. — Rhododendrites talk |  01:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Peulle (talk) 08:45, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don't think the colour noise is "digital" as King of Hearts claims, but the colour has been altered in the file history, producing a colour shift and more contrast/saturation. I think that alteration of a historic photo is not what Commons should be about. Personally, I would prefer it without the chair, and the point Rhododendrites is making could be served by being at opposite ends of a large empty table. -- Colin (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Ķemeru purva laipa.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2021 at 17:43:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Lativa
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Jolanta Liva - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 17:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful. Not technically perfect, but wonderful atmosphere. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The red dot and the strong CA are extremely disturbing IMO--Ermell (talk) 22:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but perhaps someone could just clone out the [lens flare, presumably] — Rhododendrites talk |  01:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral, perhaps the CA can be fixed or cropped out. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral after looking again and again at it. With the raw image file, it should be quite simple to fix the CA and that irritating red dot/lens flare, so I do not understand why the photographer did not do it. The duty of a photographer is not only to see great photos and to capture them correctly, but also to do adequate post-processing ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 06:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Daniel and Aristeas -- Radomianin (talk) 09:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Raabklamm Kaisermantel Echter Alant-5535.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2021 at 10:09:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Silver-washed fritillary in the Raabklamm (Styria)

File:Matthäus Merian, Le plan de la ville, cité, université fauxbourg de Paris - Paris Musées.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2021 at 09:44:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Merian map of Paris

File:El infante Carlos María Isidro de Borbón (Museo del Prado).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2021 at 06:10:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of Infante Carlos María Isidro of Spain, by court painter Vicente López Portaña. Carlos was brother of Ferdinand VII of Spain, and his next in line in the Spanish Salic law of succession due to there being no direct male heir. However, when Ferdinand issued the Pragmatic Sanction of 1830, the succession then passed on to his daughter Isabella II of Spain as his first child (regardless of gender). This led to the Carlist Wars upon Ferdinand's death, a series of bloody civil wars in Spain during the 19th century.

File:Bloemknoppen van Verbesina alternifolia. 07-09-2021. (d.j.b).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2021 at 04:34:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • ✓ Done. Halo’s removed. Thank you for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Background noise ? Gzen92 [discuter] 07:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Noise reduction + div. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is a halo and there are many cloning errors. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Improved but lots to do on the spiders' webs. All blurry near the petals. It's a typical focus-stacking nightmare. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

File:The artist's face behind his hand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2021 at 20:59:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"The artist's face behind his hand" or "Don't take pictures of me ", 2021

File:Orphan baby monkey in Liquiçá, Timor Leste (32284436072).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2021 at 17:37:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Orphaned baby monkey in Liquiçá, East Timor, whose mother had been shot and killed the day before.
  • Thank you very much! --Aristeas (talk) 05:46, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noise among other concerns. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp: Do you think the noise can be fixed somehow? I'm not an expert in image processing. —capmo (talk) 12:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • I'm afraid the quality is just not there, very strange shutter speed; noise is not perhaps the right word. And I have no idea why the monkey has been left lying on rocks. Doesn't look good. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:10, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the answer. I think he's just taking a sunbath. Rocks can become quite warm in East Timor, he must be enjoying it :) —capmo (talk) 17:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lovely lighting, but per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Deesis with Saints, triptych 18-19 cent.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2021 at 15:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Deesis with Saints, triptych 18-19 cent
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Unknown creator. My photo. -- Mile (talk) 15:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 15:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but @PetarM: could you please replace the license with {{Licensed-PD-Art|PD-old-100|cc-zero}}? This just makes it extra clear that you are hereby releasing your rights as a photographer rather than merely describing the copyright status of the work. Users around the world will be confident that the image is PD and won't be affected by any adverse court ruling in their country. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Mile (talk) 05:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and edited the image description to include the names of the saints depicted. —capmo (talk) 00:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful triptych.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good photo of an impressive triptych. --Aristeas (talk) 06:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas -- Radomianin (talk) 09:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Commonists 18:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 08:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

File:La vallata di Poggiorsini vista nel dettaglio.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2021 at 13:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Just discovered in metadata: The fact of the focal length of 386 mm changes my vote to Symbol support vote.svg Support :) -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Because with a longer focal length, the depth of field decreases. I had not considered this in my neutral vote. If I had looked in the metadata, my vote would have been a support :) -- Radomianin (talk) 09:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment So because the short depth of field is intentional, that makes the photo great. I don't agree. Beautiful light and textures, but it's not good to me beyond about 40% of full size. I won't break up the unanimous support, though, as I do like the photo at full screen (about 20% of full size) and might react to larger sizes differently if I were looking at a framed photo on a gallery wall at a distance. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Many thanks for your answer. I actually meant it more precisely that the shallow depth of field is technically caused. But I knew about it only after looking into the metadata and accepted the photo as it is, despite the flaw. Greetings :) -- Radomianin (talk) 09:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • As I understood it, Radomianin meant that (please correct me if I'm wrong!) at such a long focal length a narrow depth of field is unavoidable, rather than intentional. Closing down the aperture would bring only a small improvement, at the expense of sharpness ([1]). The photographer could perhaps have focused on the house instead of the centre of the image to make the narrow depth of field less apparent, but in my opinion the larger issue at play is the software used for developing the raw file (likely responsible for the blotchy appearence of the grass and dirt patches, see comment below). Anyway, still a wonderful picture and a great example of the benefits of using a telephoto lens for landscape photography - if one is willing to lug it around :) Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Many thanks to Julesvernex2, with your excellent knowledge of English, you have clearly stated my point. Thanks to Ikan for the constructive discussion, which is based only on my first decision that I have afterwards changed, based on (for me) new knowledge. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very satisfying color and light — Rhododendrites talk |  20:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice atmosphere. --Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 05:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 06:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hanooz 07:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Fishmax77, Adobe Camera Raw often does a terrible job demosaicing Fuji's X-trans raw files (e.g. blotchy patches of grass). I would suggest using instead Capture One or Iridient X-Transformer (available as a plugin for Lightroom and Photoshop) to get the most out of this incredible image Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay 💬 17:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Axel (talk) 19:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 22:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 12:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Absolutely excellent! --Basotxerri (talk) 18:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I wish I could paint this --Schnobby (talk) 07:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Lüdinghausen, Burg Kakesbeck -- 2021 -- 8860.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2021 at 10:39:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kakesbeck Castle in the Bechtrup hamlet in Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Cohombro de mar pardo (Holothuria arguinensis), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2020-07-23, DD 34.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2021 at 08:31:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sea cucumber (Holothuria arguinensis), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Phylum_:_Echinodermata
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Sea cucumber (Holothuria arguinensis) of an approximierte length of 30 centimetres (12 in), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal. Sea cucumbers are echinoderms and are found on the sea floor worldwide. The number of holothurian species worldwide is over 1,700. Many of these are gathered for human consumption and some species are cultivated in aquaculture systems. Sea cucumbers serve a useful role in the marine ecosystem as they help recycle nutrients, breaking down detritus and other organic matter after which bacteria can continue the degradation process. All by me, Poco a poco (talk) 08:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay 💬 10:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --IamMM (talk) 13:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question About how big is this creature? The en.wp article doesn't say. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:43, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    Ikan Kekek, it was about 30 centimetres (12 in) long, I added that information above and in the description page Poco a poco (talk) 20:32, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Symbol support vote.svg Support Great details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

File:When Depew goes to the Senate by Homer Davenport (cropped).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2021 at 10:26:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Political cartoon "When Depew goes to the Senate", 1899

File:Gooseneckbarnacles.jpg (delist), not delisted[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2021 at 09:58:56
Lepas anatifera Linnaeus

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Created and uploaded by Tompagenet - nominated and edited by Aurevilly (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist This picture doesn't even have a focus, it's strange how he got the featured picture.--Q28 (talk) 09:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Quality is OK, and we don't delist only because "today it would not pass". --A.Savin 11:12, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep per A.Savin -- Radomianin (talk) 12:21, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Still works as a texture. Daniel Case (talk) 17:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Very respectable photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:46, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 05:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 delist, 5 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Landscape with the Good Samaritan - Rembrandt.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2021 at 08:59:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rembrandt


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:James Abram Garfield, photo portrait seated.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2021 at 08:28:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

President James A. Garfield, circa 1870–1880


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Bell Miner 1 - Nepean Weir.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2021 at 06:09:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bell miner


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Second Beach Olympic June 2018 008.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2021 at 01:23:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Second Beach, Olympic National Park
+1 Daniel Case (talk) 17:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
@Iifar, Daniel Case: Done. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Love the combination of the soft, horizontal/slightly diagonal lines of the waves with the sharp, “bumpy” vertical structures of the rocks and trees. --Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks like it is leaning to the right but that is probably an optical illusion.--Ermell (talk) 21:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for the edited version: Atmospheric photo of an interesting place. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --IamMM (talk) 13:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Commonists 18:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose I keep coming back to this one to give it another try, but the composition just doesn't work for me, sorry. The main thing for me is the stacks just seem squished at the top of the frame, with the focus on the waves in front of it (which are nice, but not particularly unusual). The positions of the islands in the frame create a helpful slope via their relative size, but apart from the light on the left island, I don't find them particularly appealing. I don't know the spot, but I wonder what a wider composition would look like, and/or one with more sky, and/or a different perspective on the stacks... — Rhododendrites talk |  01:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
    @Rhododendrites: I do have a wider version, File:Second Beach Olympic June 2018 009.jpg. I was struggling to decide which one to nominate, but I polled a few of my friends and a majority preferred 008. IMO the advantage of 008 is the more prominent foam in the waves, while the advantage of 009 is the two stones in the lower right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Leidschendam, de Molendriegang RM25724-6 vanaf de Stompwijkseweg IMG 9984 2021-08-03 11.04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2021 at 19:17:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Leidschendam, the Molendriegang (Three Windmills)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#The_Netherlands
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Michielverbeek -- Michielverbeek (talk) 19:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Typically Holland --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Michielverbeek (talk) 19:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bland lighting, and I don't like how the many horizontal lines in the composition are cut off by the canal. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dark and dull in color, and while the subject is nice I think a photo taken in a sunnier day with better composition would be much much better. A 50% crop focusing on the windmills lends a nicer scene, with some horses, the canal, and the windmill all in view (even if the composition of the crop is still not great it maybe gives you some ideas for a follow-up image, seeing how (I assume) due to your username you are Dutch and live nearby. A. C. Santacruz (talk) 22:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • I am Dutch, but I am not living nearby the location. IMO black cand white cows fit in the scene, horses not. --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • That's unfortunate! Hopefully you can find similar locations tho. I'd at least encourage you to keep uploading to Commons! Even if not FP level, quality images are always good :D A. C. Santacruz (talk) 22:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a good photo, but it's actually too typical, in the non-special sense, as stated above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lack of detail, light conditions were not favorable. --Ivar (talk) 06:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 05:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Water-Moon Avalokitesvara (Freer Gallery of Art).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2021 at 14:18:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Krzyżanowski, Konrad (1872-1922) - Clouds in Finland - National Museum Kraków.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2021 at 11:13:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Clouds in Finland
Another one for comparison
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Landscapes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Konrad Krzyżanowski - uploaded by Andrew J.Kurbiko - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 11:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 11:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Detailed reproduction with a high encyclopedic value. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fantastic piece of art. Thank you for uploading. A. C. Santacruz (talk) 22:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 03:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't find this exceptional or fantastic at all. I find it nauseating. Seven Pandas (talk) 18:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
    Tell us more! What's nauseating? Finland? Sky? Landscapes? Let's talk about it! --95.160.159.116 19:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --IamMM (talk) 13:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I tend to agree with Seven Pandas: Krzyżanowski has better paintings... this one looks like something my 5yo son or daughter would paint (if I had one, lol); But speaking seriously, I don't like the pale colours; they are more vivid in the version to the right, and also here. —capmo (talk) 01:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The photo at the right has to be removed, but the argument about the colors seems like a good argument to me. Why would it not be a good argument? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per argument on colors, pending a possibly persuasive reply. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thats why is always good to have one with the walls, to cover the temperature. I still think this 1st is probably more reliable. --Mile (talk) 07:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Radial engine.gif (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2021 at 09:30:43
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This picture is really too small, I wonder why it is still a feature picture ~14 years. (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Q28 (talk) 09:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol flower.svg Remark: The picture was nominated by Chris 73, produced and uploaded by Duk.--Q28 (talk) 09:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist It's still a featured picture because no-one nominated it for delisting until now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per above -- Radomianin (talk) 17:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Too small, and we're really trying to discourage the use of animated .GIfs anyway. Daniel Case (talk) 17:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per others. --Peulle (talk) 18:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per others. --Cayambe (talk) 20:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per others.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 03:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Ivar (talk) 06:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per others. --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 04:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
    @Bestoernesto: Please vote either {{Delist}} or {{Keep}}. Regards --A.Savin 12:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Caldeira, isla de Fayal, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-28, DD 25-30 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2021 at 08:15:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Caldeira Volcano, Faial Island, Azores, Portugal
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Caldeira Volcano, Faial Island, Azores, Portugal. It's the highest mountain, massive stratovolcano and the largest geomorphological structure that forms the island of Faial. The mountain's highest point, Cabeço Gordo, reaches 1,043 metres (3,422 ft) above sea level. The caldera is 2 kilometres (1.2 mi) wide and 400 metres (1,300 ft) in depth below the crater rim. All by me, Poco a poco (talk) 08:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting, but not really exciting. Would probably have more chance as a VI. Daniel Case (talk) 14:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral There is strong diference in sharpnes across the photo at least size is big. --Mile (talk) 17:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love the dynamism of the uneven light and the uncertain atmosphere created by the clouds. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good VI candidate. It's very interesting to look into a dead caldera that's full of plants. However, I think the photo would be more valuable if it could be sharper, which probably would require different weather. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
    @Ikan Kekek: In my opinion, a 60+ MP image should not be nitpicked for pixel-level sharpness, unless it duplicates an existing FP and is competing primarily on quality. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
    I'm thinking about it in comparison to other landscape photos we've been featuring, but note that I haven't voted on this nomination so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:53, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    Yes, but to this day we regularly feature 15 MP landscapes without anyone complaining about resolution - this photo is absolutely tack-sharp at 50%. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Not quite tack sharp, IMO. Your monitor(s) and eyes may vary, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel and Mile. --Ivar (talk) 06:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per KoH. IMHO this is a very atmospheric and interesting panorama, the mixed light and clouds add some magic to it. --Aristeas (talk) 09:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --IamMM (talk) 13:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support agree w/ KoH — Rhododendrites talk |  20:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 04:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 18:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Commonists 18:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Winter auf dem Melpertser Rasenberg.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2021 at 14:42:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winter in the Rhön Mountains
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Winter in the Long Rhön with distant view to the Thuringian Forest. All by me. --Milseburg (talk) 14:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 16:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 18:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay 💬 16:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A. C. Santacruz (talk) 22:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 03:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --IamMM (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose - It may be a VI (and it looks like it will pass FPC), but I have trouble finding the "wow" in the subject and composition, sorry. — Rhododendrites talk |  20:25, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose 1/320s @ f/16 is about a stop underexposed for snow. The darkness of the sky looks unnatural. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Commonists 18:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Rhododendrites - there's nothing in the upper right corner to help the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Die Belichtung stimmt nicht: Schnee sollte auf Winterbildern nicht grau, sondern weiß sein. Ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass das noch – sofern dies eine RAW-Aufnahme ist – korrigiert werden kann. Für diesen Fall werde ich mein Votum gerne ändern. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 

File:Flight of Refugees Across Wrecked Bridge in Korea (Original).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2021 at 04:26:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flight of refugees across a wrecked bridge in Korea
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1950-1960
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by w:Max Desfor - uploaded by Sadopaul - nominated by Sadopaul -- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 04:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Korean war is one of the most impactful events in 1950-1960 but there has been no FP still. This picture shows refugees evacuating from Pyeongyang to South. The resolution is somewhat low but it seems due to restriction of contemporary photography technique (other contemporary FPs are similar).-- — Sadopaul 💬 📁 04:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The notice on the file says "This work is in the public domain because it was published in the United States between 1926 and 1963, and although there may or may not have been a copyright notice, the copyright was not renewed." The notice on the linked AP page says: "This content is intended for editorial use only. For other uses, additional clearances may be required." Which one is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  • These press agencies are notorious for copyfraud. COM:ALAMY is the worst, claiming images they don't even own, but it is normal for other agencies to continue to sell their own works even after they have entered the public domain. That said, @Sadopaul: have you actually performed a search of copyright renewals to ensure that the copyright has not been renewed? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  • @King of Hearts:Actually I have pursued for a half-hour but I could not find sufficient information or reliable source standing for or against. In this case, this web linked in the category page above might be the most plausible answer.— Sadopaul 💬 📁 11:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Obvious current relevance. Daniel Case (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive photo. --Aristeas (talk) 20:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 05:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Famous, dramatic photograph, but maybe enlarged too much for its level of sharpness? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 03:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The file should be renamed. --Yann (talk) 11:11, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Rename done.— Sadopaul 💬 📁 07:12, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --IamMM (talk) 13:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1950-1960
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:特色靚相候選&oldid=358003323"