Commons:特色靚相候選

呢度係成為特色靚相嘅候選區。請留意呢度唔係同每日靚相一樣。

要知道之前有乜提名，睇睇：Commons:等色靚相/紀錄

正式嘅事物[edit]

提名[edit]

如果您認為您已經創作或搵到一張可能有價值的圖片，請將佢加到「提名」部分嘅最頂部。用呢個連結加入。

喺您提名之前，請肯定已經喺相應的圖片加上適當嘅版權標籤。

請喺投票嘅時候利用您嘅語言或者使用下面嘅模板：

支持 - Support, Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, ...
反對 - Oppose, No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, ...

另外，您亦可以使用模板{{Oppose}}同{{Support}}

您亦可以表達使用{{I love}}代表您喜歡呢張圖片或您想利用{{Neutral}}嚟表達您嘅睇法。

特色靚相候選方針[edit]

14 日投票持間。結果將會喺提名後嘅第 15 日公佈決定。
歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅提名
歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅討論貢獻
匿名貢獻者嘅投票不作計算
提名者不會計作票數。必須另作解釋作出支持。
記住，Wikimedia Commons 計劃嘅目標係提供一個中央式嘅檔案庫，以提供所有 Wikimedia 計劃(包括未來的計劃)裏使用。呢個唔只係於置 Wikipedia 嘅圖片，因此呢啲圖片唔係只針對嗰個計劃作出決定。

要成功登上特色靚相，必須合乎以下嘅條件。

合理嘅牌照 (當然)
最少 5 張支持票
支持／反對嘅比例最少為 2:1 (三分二多數，即最少 67% 支持)

有關點樣處理舊嘅提名，睇睇Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished。

更新呢一頁：purge this page's cache

提名[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Christophorus 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 16:10:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_indoors
Info Saint Christopher at the winged altar of the parish- and pilgrimage church Kefermarkt, Upper Austria. Anonymous master (called Master of the Kefermarkt Altarpiece), around 1497. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Anonymous, but stunning craftsmanship, captured well. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:32, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I think you have got just the right composition so that we get a sense of how the alterpiece actually looks. Cmao20 (talk) 18:32, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Gurung child at Upper Sinuwa during Annapurna Base camp trek in a Tea house-2972.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 13:40:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Standing_people
Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 13:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 13:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Question Can you indicate on the file page that you have parental/guardian permission to use this image, please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Yes, i can and do have a permission to use this child's portrait. I asked his father about this photo and doesn't have any problem. But is there any template to indicate Parental Permission --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Bijay. There probably is, someone else might help? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks @Charlesjsharp:, Or Is it OK to write in description section that this user have permission to use this photo in Commons--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

The template we have is {{Consent}}. If you use that and write about the father's permission in the description, that's enough. --Cart (talk) 18:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Question Why did you applied the vignetting and looking at it I have the impression that the use of the 25 mm so close to the head and this being tilted results in a deformation of the head. I don't think that a wide angle lens is usually a good choice por portrait shots Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img62 Ortaköy Mosque.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 13:35:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Turkey
Info Dome interior of the Ortaköy Mosque, Istanbul ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 13:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 13:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Interesting perspective. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --XRay ^talk 14:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Great composition.--iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support IMO very beautiful and the perspective is just right here. Cmao20 (talk) 18:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak support Symmetry is not perfect, the image is tilted in cccw direction (following the vertical chain in the very middle) and noise level is just acceptable, but the motif is very nice --Poco a poco (talk) 18:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Theyyam at peeleri vayanaattukulavan kaavu 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 08:41:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info--Theyyam (Teyyam, Theyam, Theyyattam) is a popular ritual form of worship in Kerala, India. Theyyam is a living cult with several thousand-year-old traditions, rituals and customs. The performers of Theyyam belong to folk communities. Theyyam is mixture of folk arts like folk painting, folk song, folk dance etc.

-- created by, uploaded by, nominated by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I think this is a good photo of cultural heritage. It works well because you can see the intent expression of the man concentrating on his task. There are a few quibbles about image quality but overall this seems like an FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 18:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose The subject is FP-worthy but I'm not convinced by the crop, special at the bottom, the noise/detail level and the cluttered background, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose agree poco Seven Pandas (talk) 21:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Browning Range during winter sunrise, Lake Kaniere Scenic Reserve, West Coast, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 01:33:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/New_Zealand#West_Coast_(Te_Tai_Poutini)
Info Created, uploaded and nominated by me. It's Browning Range during sunrise. -- Podzemnik (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak Support Very nice, but a shame that the ridge is so close to the bottom edge at the center right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support a bit boring composition but I can't say no to this gorgeous light - Benh (talk) 06:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per Benh. Cmao20 (talk) 18:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Neutral Per Benh and too hazy too me, also agree with KoH Poco a poco (talk) 18:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Luz Train Station, Sao Paulo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 14:11:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 14:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support For once I think the people add to rather than detract from this scene. Cmao20 (talk) 15:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose A good documentation of everyday life, but no element stands out to give me that wow-feeling like in for example File:Ana rosa metro station, São Paulo, Brazil.jpg with its light and crispness. Here everything is just uniform. Also wonder why the photo isn't symmetrically cropped on the right side when everything else is so centered. --Cart (talk) 10:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

if I cut the right I run the risk that the cut is too close to the train door, regarding the other photo it is really a art work, thanks. I'm going to try to make another cut to see what you think --Wilfredor (talk) 13:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose per W.Carter. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Alt cut[edit]

Info Thanks Cart for your recomendation. I preffer this cut --Wilfredor (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry Wilfredor but I prefer the original cut. The original worked well because the lampposts acted like a framing device, but without them it seems a bit like just a random photo of a train station. Cmao20 (talk) 18:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Ottoman surrender of Jerusalem restored.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 11:56:11

Info The biggest problems are that the crop removes people from the image - which I believe makes much of the description inaccurate - and it turns a semi-transparent flag (expected for thin fabric seen against a bright sky) into a solid flag, which looks really unnatural. I just don't think this is a good example of our work. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep If you compare to this, only one person was cropped out. I also see no problems with the flag. --Andrei (talk) 12:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist per Adam. Buidhe (talk) 21:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist because of the destructive crop. Historical photos should be restored faithfully. Plus, the guy on the left of the original photo looks like an important person. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist per others --StellarHalo (talk) 06:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist per others. --Cayambe (talk) 07:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist No need to make such strange alterations to an historical photo. Cmao20 (talk) 18:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Isojärvi panorama 3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 11:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Finland
Info There are 187,888 lakes, about 509,800 summer cottages, and estimated 3,2 million saunas in Finland. The image depicts a common summer day view over a lake in Finland, in this case the photo is taken from my summer cottage. The lake is called Isojärvi, and it is the 97. largest lake in Finland. The day was beautiful, and the sunset was equally stunning. Created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 11:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support —kallerna (talk) 11:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Neutral Nice reflections and I like the wider crop, but it seems oversharpened to me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Per Cmao20, it's not well processed and a bit tilted. I also find the motif a bit average. --Cart (talk) 10:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Aina-kari near Zarih of Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 06:13:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 06:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 06:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Beautiful as always. I notice in your Exif data, you don't include the model of your camera. I think people would be interested to know what camera you are using. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Thanks Mr Kekek. I use fujifilm GFX 50R camera. because of Panorama and HDR techniques, some of my pictures exif data are removed.--Amirpashaei (talk) 09:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

That info should be on the file page, not here. I've added the Template:Photo Information to the page, you can fill in information that way if the exif is lost. I've also fixed the links to wiki-pages in the description for you. --Cart (talk) 11:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Very easy to circumvent this: just c+p the edited picture on the original picture, and save it as its copy. --A.Savin 11:19, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Miss Carter. I wrote the exif data.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Mr Savin. I will try this method.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Support Lovely image. Although all the reflections does make me somewhat wish for a stereoscopic view. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

@Adam Cuerden: Thanks Mr Cuerden. Stereoscopic view is a main purpose of building Muqarnas . the purpose in the Āina kāri is showing Glamor and glitter.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

I mean as in a 3D view, so that you can tell the shapes of the complex, reflective structures. Obviously, that's not happening. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

I understood. If we have light and shadow in a picture we have 3D view too. but in Āina kāri art you just see light's reflection and there is no shadow. because that reason you don't see the shape not even in reality and with your eyes.--Amirpashaei (talk) 13:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Support Another good one. Seems like a tremendously unusual place with all that green. Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Absolutamente si --Wilfredor (talk) 17:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Although I think the top half could have a little, little bit more contrast for better impact. -- Cart (talk) 10:14, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

I didn't want to go far from original picture. but I agree with you in more contrast Miss Carter.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Support I kind of would like to see more at the bottom (cropped chandalier) but anyhow, great Poco a poco (talk) 18:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Mr Silva. I will shot from floor to the ceiling and from top to floor next time.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Maroc Marrakech Jemaa-el-Fna Luc Viatour.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 23:19:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jemaa el-Fnaa is a square and market place in Marrakesh's medina quarter (old city). It remains the main square of Marrakesh, used by locals and tourists.

Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the gallery here>]]
Info created by Lviatour - uploaded by Lviatour - nominated by Editor-1
Support -- Editor-1 (talk) 23:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose A snapshot with lots of posterization, and please add the correct gallery. Find it by looking at COM:FP, but somewhere in it will be "Pictures" and "#Morocco". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Unbalanced composition with a bright, empty sky taking up too much space. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

We can crop the sky easily by using CropTool--Editor-1 (talk) 03:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Pretty but doesn't add up to more than a snapshot to me with the obvious tilt, blown-out featureless sky, and blurry ledge in the bottom left corner. Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

File:2017-02-02 APRIL MORAN - IMO 9373711.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 18:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info: With antenna lowered for bridges, sea-going tugboat April Moran, heads down the Elizabeth River at dusk off Norfolk, Virginia, USA. - created - uploaded - nominated by GRDN711 (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- GRDN711 (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Neutral The light in this pic is really beautiful, but I can't help feeling the focus has been missed, it doesn't seem quite sharp. But I don't want to oppose such a lovely scene. Cmao20 (talk) 15:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Very nice light and mood, but unfortunately not sharp enough and though the lowered navigation light mast (not an antenna) has some educational value, it spoils the contour of the boat a bit. Better to catch it on the other side of the bridge. --Cart (talk) 10:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per W.Carter. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Chichester Cathedral Choir, West Sussex, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 18:29:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United Kingdom
Info Chichester Cathedral is one of the 26 medieval cathedrals of England. Although it isn't the largest, its architecture is seen by critics as one of the finest examples of the period; it also has the distinction of being the only medieval English cathedral visible from the sea. There are currently no FPs from this cathedral, but Diliff has several shots on Commons, and this shot of the choir seems the best of the series. created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Wow. Unfortunately not completely symmetrical, but I think it's the corridor's problem rather than the photographer's. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes, most English cathedrals are not perfectly symmetrical. See Ripon Cathedral for an example that just gets odder the more you look at it. Cmao20 (talk) 18:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Support Nothing is perfectly synmetrical --Wilfredor (talk) 20:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Amazing that there are still not-yet-nominated FPs from David after all these years. I hope he and his family are doing well, and that he comes back some time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Of course. Has he really been gone that long? It feels like he was here last year still. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Great photo. Buidhe (talk) 22:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 10:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Andrei (talk) 14:14, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Landscape of Luang Prabang with a temporary wooden footbridge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 18:25:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info A really nice landscape from Basile Morin, and the composition is very different from all his other Laotian FPs. created by Basile Morin - uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per nom. Related to File:Working at the consolidation of a wooden footbridge in Luang Prabang - 1 (Side view).jpg but significantly different, and beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Amazing photo! Buidhe (talk) 22:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:09, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Laos + nice light = Support - Benh (talk) 06:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Andrei (talk) 14:14, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose That bridge has indeed wow-factor but to me it doesn't work in this composition, there are too many other elements in the compo. Poco a poco (talk) 18:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support For me the bridge is a complementary diagonal to the river banks. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose nothing spectacular here Seven Pandas (talk) 21:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Wroclaw- Ratusz, wieza.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 16:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Poland
Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Andrei (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak support The nice clock on the tower is interesting enough to feature, though I must say I wish it didn't have such a boring building behind it. Cmao20 (talk) 17:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Info Constructed in 1931, the Municipal Savings Bank is an iconic example of the German Modernist architecture. Designed by Henrich Rump, the winning project was in line with the modernist style and innovative urban design of Max Berg, creator of the Centennial Hall (UNESCO site). Located in the middle of the Old Town Square, next to Baroque and Renaissance houses, it symbolizes not only power of Silesian economy, but the futuristic vision and ambitions of the city. --Andrei (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'm sure it's an important building, but the architecture really doesn't appeal to me. I'm not a fan of modernism overall to be honest. The picture is still good though. Cmao20 (talk) 18:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Support Very eye-catching, very nice colors. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per Christian. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Bijay chaurasia (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:09, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Anas platyrhynchos - Weiherwald - Karlsruhe 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 11:12:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Family_:_Anatidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Composition and image quality look fine to me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support A duck ducking down in duckweed. Cute. Daniel Case (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose The area between and peak looks awkward, probably it was darker and has been lighten up a bit, the result doesn't look realistic. Quality otherwise is good and the green layer nice but at the end of the day a duck in a center of an image, no dynamic there, sorry. --Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Dörzbach - Hohebach - Jüdischer Friedhof - Detailansicht 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 07:12:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Well composed and sad. Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose The headstones in the back are not in focus Buidhe (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

You're right, but is there any reason they have to be? IMO there's nothing wrong with a picture focussing only on the ones nearest the camera. Aristeas has gone for a similar approach in this FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- I would say that it adds depth to the photo --Andrei (talk) 18:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

+1 Cmao20 (talk) 18:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Composition. The other FP has a nice way of drawing the viewer's eyes to the center, but this one has too many prominent shapes near the far edges, which is distracting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support. The fungi on the stones, their slightly skewed stance, the low light and the shallow DoF combine to reinforce an overarching theme of the slow fade of the dead from the consciousness of the living, the fate that awaits us all: "One by one they were all becoming shades. Better pass boldly into that other world, in the full glory of some passion, than fade and wither dismally with age." Daniel Case (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Hazel MacKaye and dog by Harris & Ewing.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 06:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Harris & Ewing - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Info This is probably my favourite of all the portraits I've done of notable people. Just something about the genuine smile and choosing to be photographed with her dog. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Question Is there something wrong with the top half of her hair? Seems too light. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: Black and white is kind of a weird medium. Hair colours that aren't either fairly near black or fairly near blond can come out a bit strange. I think it's just a relatively light brown (or possibly red) hair, with sun shining on it. Compare https://www.loc.gov/item/mnwp000122/ (another image, same photography session), the very wild hair of https://www.loc.gov/resource/mnwp.275005/ and especially https://www.loc.gov/resource/agc.7a17749/ In short, it's odd, but it seems to be reasonably accurate. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Excellent and lovely portrait. Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Buidhe (talk) 17:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:2019W3046 - Львів.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 06:15:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created by Myroslav Vydrak - uploaded by Myroslav Vydrak - nominated by Мирослав Видрак -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 06:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 06:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose I can see that it must have been very pleasant to be there in that weather, but I don't see what I consider an unusually great composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose A very beautiful photograph with nice colours but a) it needs a perspective correction and b) I too am not quite sold on the composition - the path takes up too much of the frame for me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others. Lack of sharpness: there is a small sharp focal plane and it seems quite arbitrary, as a result it seems that almost nothing is in focus. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose This image has the elements of a lot of great autumn photos, but without actually being one. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Boletus erythropus 2010 G1.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 21:31:19

Info Too cluttered, blurry grass blade in front of the stump, crop unnecessarily wide, distracting branches, dim lighting, average composition (Original nomination)
Delist It has encyclopedic value but I have seen much better fungus images fail to get promoted to FP. Also, the natural phenomenon depicted could be reproduced in a lab/artificial setting and so a studio shot is very much possible. -- StellarHalo (talk) 21:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist I agree - the level of detail here does not seem like FP quality. --Peulle (talk) 22:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist Low wow and sadly well below FP quality in 2020. Cmao20 (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist per others. -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist +1 --El Grafo (talk) 14:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist , does not seem special. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Delist --Cayambe (talk) 07:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Clouds reflected in a bay with jellyfish infestation at Rågårdsdal.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 21:10:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Sweden
Info Or... Welcome to the floating forests of Pandora!

Clouds reflected in a bay with jellyfish infestation in Åbyfjorden at Rågårdsdal, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. Most of the jellies are moon jellyfish (Aurelia aurita) and lion's mane jellyfish (Cyanea capillata). When these gatherings occur, the lion's manes go into a bit of a feeding frenzy capturing and eating moon jellies. The bigger lion's manes will capture smaller moon jellies with their tentacles and drag them up into their mouths. Smaller lion's manes will attach themselves to a moon jelly and eat. They seem to prefer eating the moon jellies from the underside. Some of the moon jellies in this photo are tattered and flaccid after having been partially eaten by lion's manes, others have circular marks from the lion's manes feeding. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Support -- Cart (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Too much noise for me, and I find the reflections more disturbing than adding to the picture.--Peulle (talk) 22:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose the shadow spoils everything. JukoFF (talk) 22:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Good abstract work. I think it succeeds mainly because of its sheer uniqueness, I have never seen anything quite like it. Cmao20 (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Disturbing reflections and the composition doesn't work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile, but if you crop out most of the cloud reflections, it might work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per Cmao—absolutely unique Buidhe (talk) 01:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support more for the jellyfishes. Nice shot! - Benh (talk) 06:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Per Ikan. I might support without the cloud reflections. Sorry. --StellarHalo (talk) 08:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Another Cocteau Twins cover-style Cart image ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Works for me.--iMahesh (talk) 15:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 20:04:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Lemuridae (Lemurs)
Info This lemur is on the front cover of Issue Four of my free magazine (read online) or download pdf. This month I have amazing photos from Llez, Archaeodontosaurus, Cayambe, Rhododendrites, Wilfredor and Jkadavoor. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I can't resist lemurs since they, apparently, can't resist me. I visited a park with lemurs once and we were told to strictly not touch the lemurs. No one had told the lemurs the same. I was the tallest in the group and the lemurs took turns jumping down and perching on my head. Spent most of that visit with a "lemur hat". ;-) --Cart (talk) 21:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose I always appreciate for wildlife images but this one is not at the level of others. Main issues here are the leaf in front of the face, the tilt (see the water level) and the noise level --Poco a poco (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose a good shot no more. JukoFF (talk) 22:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Resolution is not your highest but overall this still makes it to FP. Obviously this is an endangered species and I am happier to make allowances because of that. The quality is good overall despite a bit of noise and the angle and composition are really good, showing the whole animal very well. Definitely one of the best shots of the species on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 22:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support FP for me. Nice composition, facial expression and shape of its tail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Too noisy and too low resolution. The grass spoils a bit. Looking at the first version, the quality had no real FP potential (although the reprocess is better). Light very average -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak support per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 00:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support - Benh (talk) 06:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco.--Ermell (talk) 07:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. --Ivar (talk) 10:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I appreciate the current processing, and the image is overall eye-catching. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I can't help but like it after Cart's story. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Mossy leaf-tailed gecko (Uroplatus sikorae)[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 20:12:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Hiding
Revealing itself

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Gekkonidae (Geckos)
Info The mossy leaf-tailed gecko has developed an amazing camouflage system. It has irregular flaps of skin (known as a dermal flap) that run along its body so that it can press itself against a tree branch or trunk and disappear. The flaps mean that it doesn’t throw a shadow. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support This is really fascinating. -- B2Belgium (talk) 20:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I really thought for a minute that you nominated a branch without a gecko and another branch with a gecko until I read the description and saw it. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support These has to be in a set! --Cart (talk) 21:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment wow, can you still do something about the frame overlapping issue on the far left of the hiding image? Poco a poco (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose For now, at least I deserve an answer why editing the left part of the left picture wouldn't be posible. The quality issues are very obvious and although this set is among the best I can think of, the quality of the left image can and should be improved Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment. Sorry Poco a poco, I didn't notice your comments which are spot on. New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Excellent set, just the way to do photos of camouflaged animals. Cmao20 (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per others. So cool! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Strong support Gorgeous illustration of camouflage in nature. Each image is fine as FP, but the set increases the value of the pair. Imagine only one picture captured in this place, we would love to see the other one. The fact we've got both clearly adds an extra documenting value. The animal itself seems rare enough and visually special to boost the candidature. Still two remarks: 1) Do you know the template {{otherversion|File:example.jpg}} you can add in the description pages? 2) Very poor categorization. I would expect at least something related to the notion of camouflage, which seems essential here -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Done thanks, though the template doesn’t seem to work very well. I edited Camouflage on Wikipedia, but the edit was reverted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

It works well IMO but is supposed to be placed in the specified section Fixed. And I've learnt something with your category added -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Support One of the best animal camouflage images I have seen on here --StellarHalo (talk) 00:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Buidhe (talk) 01:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support wooowowowowowowwww - Benh (talk) 06:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment I am groot - Benh (talk) 06:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support/ Almost ideal for set nominating. Left part of Hiding a bit unsharp. --KSK (talk) 07:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support A shame that the left part of the hiding is not perfect but a lot of wow. Never seen the animal before.--Ermell (talk) 07:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- -donald- (talk) 09:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Absolutely cool! --Basotxerri (talk) 16:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Excellent set! --GRDN711 (talk) 17:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Question How are sets handled by POTY? It would be really sad this doesn't make it to POTY candidates. - Benh (talk) 17:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Benh, sets do count for POTY, but we vote on the set as a whole rather than the pictures individually. Example here - see the '1/8' above the picture and the navigation tools to scroll through the pictures in the set. Cmao20 (talk) 18:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Sets do count in POTY, but if, I remember correctly, are poorly displayed for voting - I think only one image is displayed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

One image at a time is displayed. It's not obvious at all it is a set. I hope this doesn't compromise this set's chances. - Benh (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

As well as notifying this page that POTY has started, the organizers could improve the layout to alert voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Support per Podzemnik. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Bijay chaurasia (talk) 05:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per Benh.--iMahesh (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Crucibulum laeve - Vieux-Sautour2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 10:36:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Order_:_Agaricales_(Gilled_Mushrooms)
Info created by Gilles San Martin - uploaded & nominated by Ivar (talk) 10:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 10:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Question The description doesn't say if this is a natural background. See note. It would be nice to know. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Overall a nice focus stack but the image quality doesnt quite match up to our best and also a little dark. Cmao20 (talk) 17:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per/ Cmao20 JukoFF (talk) 22:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:12, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Wooden bench swing and wicker hammocks on a bamboo footbridge in paddy fields a sunny day during the monsoon, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 09:24:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Gnosis (talk) 15:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Outstanding composition and atmosphere. Cmao20 (talk) 17:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Buidhe (talk) 19:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support so nice atmosphere Benh (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Nice, still, isn't the left side leaning out a bit? Poco a poco (talk) 18:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:A large cabbage.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 09:15:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Brassicaceae
Info created & uploaded by Subhrajyoti07 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose no novelty. JukoFF (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Nice composition and colors. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Have gone back and forth on this one but I don't think the composition is really outstanding for FP, although the image quality is quite good. Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose If it was just the cabbage and its bed it might work, but the flowers make it too random. Daniel Case (talk) 01:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Historisches Hammerwerk am Blautopf-Abfluss.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 08:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info created & uploaded by GZagatta - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose It's a nice enough scene but to me, somehow the "zooming effect" that the lens makes here is at odds with this very peaceful and tranquil landscape. That effect is better in more action-y photos. --Cart (talk) 09:40, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Pretty enough for FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose The composition does not work for me, the main object (the building) is at the side and cropped. Furthermore, there are some CAs and perspective issues. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose While I have no issues with the composition, it perhaps does aggravate the unsharpness that's too prevalent in the image. Daniel Case (talk) 00:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is not the best and per Uoaei1, 15 mm definitely work here, but the image format doesn't Poco a poco (talk) 18:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Wetland - Weiherwald - Karlsruhe 11.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 08:12:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info A composition of white, blue, and green; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Very nice, but please mention the Lemna in the description and categories. When there is this much of it in the photo, it should be in the info as well. A {{Panorama}} template with info would hurt either. --Cart (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done Thanks --Llez (talk) 11:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose, very weak composition. JukoFF (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Very high quality, but not a compelling composition for me as most of the center is blank. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It is not blank, it is completely filled with Lemna minor (common duckweed), please zoom in to see the details, especially in the foreground --Llez (talk) 10:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  - When I talk about composition, I mean from a global perspective it is blank - it doesn't lead my eye anywhere, while the interesting bits are all on the periphery. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per other --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:45, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with KoH Poco a poco (talk) 18:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker -- 2020 -- 8874 (bw).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 04:45:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info created and uploaded and by XRay -- XRay ^talk 04:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Info It's simple, it's minimal. I like compositions like this. But if you need a full view of the gate, here it is: Gate --XRay ^talk 04:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- XRay ^talk 04:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Minimalism at its best. Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 19:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment I would crop out a tiny sliver at the bottom, as the bottom left corner is distracting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I just cloned out the tiny area. --XRay ^talk 04:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Support --Podzemnik (talk) 10:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:42, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Longsheng Rice Terraces November 2017 014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 04:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#China
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Composition. These cascading reliefs remind me the curves of the colored maps met in some scientific articles -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 09:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per Basile Morin. Cmao20 (talk) 17:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support This is something different in a nice compo Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Murión (Gymnothorax unicolor), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 49.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 19:51:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
Info Brown moray eel (Gymnothorax unicolor) found in Madeira, Portugal. I'm giving it another try. Morays are rare, they are usually hiding in holes and active during the night. I cross my fingers to hope that the composition here is acceptable. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Now this is more like what I want in a photo of a moray eel. Lurking in a crevasse ready to spring on an unsuspecting prey. The "sinister grin" is a nice bonus. --Cart (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Great shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support That looks good - Benh (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per others. Sharp head, good facial expression as Cart says. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I agree with the above, this is a much better shot and I wouldn't have supported the other one if I had noticed you'd done this one too. Cmao20 (talk) 00:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per Cart Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. This is much better than the previous one. --StellarHalo (talk) 08:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Pez lagarto diamante (Synodus synodus), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 44.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 19:47:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Aulopiformes_(Grinners)
Info Diamond lizardfish (Synodus synodus) found in Madeira, Portugal. This species has typically a length of 20 centimetres (7.9 in) and lives in the Atlantic Ocean, usually between 2 metres (6.6 ft) and 35 metres (115 ft) deep, in this case found at the bottom of a reef area 12 metres (39 ft) deep. There are no FPs of this family (and I just uploaded the first 2 QIs). c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Nice. DoF is shallow but still great considering technical challenges and in some ways I think it actually helps the photo to have only the head in focus. Cmao20 (talk) 00:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose merging background. JukoFF (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
JukoFF: what do you mean with "merging background"? too bussy? what kind of background do you expect then here? Poco a poco (talk) 06:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Nice face, natural background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Pergola - Point Pelee National Park.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 18:57:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada
Info: A pergola along the Marsh Boardwalk, Point Pelee National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I could quibble about the image quality a little, but the shadows make this a really outstanding composition, well done. Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, the shadows are the main point here, I'm glad you noticed :-) --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Support A special kind of mirroring --Llez (talk) 08:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment Doesn't work for me with this vanishing point targeting an uninteresting guardrail -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment If I may. The point of the image is the uniform lattice of the shadows. A small crop, top and bottom would give the photo a better impact. If you don't see exactly where the lattice begins, you get that infinity feeling. The bench will be cut, but that is secondary in this image IMO. See note. --Cart (talk) 09:19, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: cropped. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Yay! :-) Support --Cart (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose bad geometry. JukoFF (talk) 22:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

If one is really into Lobachevskian geometry, perhaps. Can't see what's wrong with it otherwise... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

The center square is ideal, but the top rungs are not parallel). But this is not the point, the point is that there is no enceclopedicity, what should this image illustrate on Wikipedia *? JukoFF (talk) 02:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

You keep giving this reason for opposing things here and at QIC, and I wish you'd stop. First of all, you have no idea what might be used on Wikipedia, but second, this is not Wikipedia and this is not FPC on any of the Wikipedias. You think that Commons is only about encyclopedic illustrations, not about photography in any other way? Where in the world do you get that idea from? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose I see what you were thinking but I think the image is trying to do too much. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I like this, and I don't find it a particularly complicated form, but I do find it satisfying. And for JukoFF, I could easily see this being used on Wikipedia as a good example of light and shadow in photography, but more importantly, I could see it being used on another page on photography, -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Per Daniel Poco a poco (talk) 19:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bereich der US Army -- 2020 -- 8893.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 13:59:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 13:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- XRay ^talk 13:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, it's a great new take on the old manhole theme, and I would gladly have supported if the flowers were not fused into yellow and white blobs. I think that could have been avoided. Do you think you could try a new shot? Perhaps a two shot stack of some kind. --Cart (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

No, sorry. I can't take another shot. The area is closed. Perhaps my next visit is end of September or in spring. May there are other flowers. I'll have a look. --XRay ^talk 16:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak Oppose Unfortunately overexposed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Definitely a good compositional idea, but Oppose per Cart. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak support I like the idea very much and the quality is fine for me, seems sharp and I don't think the issue with the flowers is very important. My support is only weak because I don't think the subject itself is outstanding. I've seen manhole covers that are much more ornate and beautiful than this (here are a few beautiful ones on an external site) and as good as this shot is, the subject lacks the craftsmanship and elegance of some examples I've seen, so it doesn't really fill me with amazement. Cmao20 (talk) 00:26, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Per others --Llez (talk) 08:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Per others JukoFF (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Per Cart --StellarHalo (talk) 00:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 01:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Works for me.--iMahesh (talk) 17:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Support For me too, a funny shot, for a change Poco a poco (talk) 19:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Vieux Limoilou, Québec city, Canadá 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 03:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family_:_Apidae_(Bumble_Bees,_Honey_Bees,_Carpenter_Bees,_Cuckoo_Bees,_Orchid_Bees,_and_Stingless_Bees) (I don't know. Animal or plant?)
Info created and uploaded by Wilfredor - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 03:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Certainly one of my favorite Wilfredo's pictures. I just love this one! -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 03:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment Please fix the gallery. It is you, the nominator, who decides how you want to nominate this. Don't put that on someone else. --Cart (talk) 08:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment Are you sure it is Apis melifera? I don't think so. And I see no pollen basket. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment it's a bumblebee, hard to id with this angle. --Ivar (talk) 15:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Conditional support on the ID being confimed properly. We shouldn't promote it if there is doubt as to whether the ID is correct - but I agree with the nominator, it's a really nice photo. Cmao20 (talk) 00:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose everything is very usual. JukoFF (talk) 22:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 21:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Wow again.--Ermell (talk) 22:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Amazing, and I'm impressed that the corner sharpness this time is so good. Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak support Huge resolution but underexposed in my view (overall a bit dark) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:11, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: , @Wilfredor: , Thanks. you're right about a little darkness. but I captured this place with this light pattern. the light coming from above and left and right of the picture was darker. I found this pattern of light more attractive. if darkness is annoying I can work on it. --Amirpashaei (talk) 05:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

That may improve the attractiveness, yes -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support A bit underexposed --Wilfredor (talk) 03:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support WOW again. --Gnosis (talk) 06:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support The light is better than the ones with more visible reflections. Buidhe (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --XRay ^talk 13:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support as usual. --Aristeas (talk) 14:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment How many pictures of this kind have already been nominated and awarded? I think it's getting enough. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 15:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Check out Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings. We have 203 FPs of church ceilings, 2 of synagogues, 1 of a temple and 23 of mosque ceilings. I think we can stand a few more of these very high-quality photos. ;-) However, I would really like to see some of the other 4,296 religions represented too. Not even all major religious groups have photos. --Cart (talk) 15:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

@Killarnee: , @W.carter: I can earn money by selling these picture's copy right. but to be seen by all, I abandon the copy right by uploading them in Wikimedia. I think these works are Masterpieces of Persian architectural art and rarely seen before. I agree with Miss Carter but I think we should consider these pictures Regardless of religion. these pictures reflect pure art and history of ancient world Whether Christian or Muslim. --Amirpashaei (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Of course it's all art and architecture. We just have a rather crude way of sorting photos here on Commons since our tagging system is antiquated. I sincerely thank you for donating these photos to WikiMedia, however there are always voters who get bored if there are a lot of similar photos nominated one after the other, whatever the subject. It's a very picky and tough audience. Perhaps if you had some other views or artwork you could alternate with, then you wouldn't risk what we call "reviewer-fatigue". Most experienced nominators try to mix up their noms to keep the audience alert, since it increases the chances of noms getting featured. FPC is always craving new fresh things. --Cart (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Miss Carter. I consider it. Although I seen voters wondering of my new pictures and that's raised me to nominate them.--Amirpashaei (talk) 17:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

So I've seen several such mosaic pictures in the last few days and think it's enough, which is why I don't give a pro. And what do you want to tell me "you could also sell the pictures"? Should it be blackmail or should I fall at your feet now? -Killarnee (C•T•U) 18:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Showing the architectural masterpieces to the world is my proud and honor. that's caused donating them. it's not blackmailing. you can oppose with my nominations. but I don't understand why you think other voters shouldn't support. --Amirpashaei (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

I don't give a pro because I just think that there are enough pictures of this kind, even if they are well done. At the end of the year, every second picture at POTY is a mosaic picture. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

every of these pictures are unique and designing them took many years. these art works not simple mosaic, they are unique. even now making these masterpieces are very hard and rarely can find architecture could design them. I think you don't know this art well. good luck.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I recognize the art and I know what kind of masterpieces they are, but I would like it if you would nominate landscapes for example. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 19:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Comment It seems like most of us are not bored - these ceilings are all really beautiful and different from one another, and we've seen way more pictures of churches than of mosques - but I'd surely love to see other types of photos of beautiful or interesting motifs in Iran, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

I agree with Ikan Kekek. Amirpashaei, we have absolutely loads of featured pictures of church interiors and it shouldn't stop us featuring any more as long as we can still find pictures of outstanding quality and extraordinary subjects. The exact same is true with your pictures. In fact we are quite underrepresented with mosques (and even more so with synagogues, Hindu/Sikh temples etc.) compared with churches, so as far as I'm concerned I'm happy to vote support for almost any of these pictures you present us with. Cmao20 (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

@W.carter: , @Ikan Kekek: , @Cmao20: Thanks for your support and high understanding of art. My purpose of nominating these pictures is to be seen better and using in more pages. --Amirpashaei (talk) 07:09, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

You say "seen better and using in more pages", but this image is not used as far as I can see Amirpashaei. So why not? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

I meant relevant pages. on of the my purposes is saving these monuments in image form. because most of heritage in Iran don't maintain very well.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Charles, I'm not surprised by that. The photo is recently uploaded and the author is foremost a photographer donating his photos to us and not a very active Wikipedian. Not every uploader will immediately go about spreading their photos on as many articles as possible. Also remember that Commons photos are used by many, many other sites outside the Wiki-verse, those uses don't show up on the Commons file page. I often find my photos online in the most unlikely places, but it always takes a while for a photo to get spread. By uploading photos here we make them available for people and that is enough. --Cart (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Miss Carter. Exactly. I agree.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I find it a bit boring to see so many similar candidates (and ceilings are a bit of a super cooperative easy subjects), but they are all incredible shots in my view. - Benh (talk) 20:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I'm not bored. :) On the contrary, I find these pictures absolutely stunning. –– B2Belgium (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Amazing. JukoFF (talk) 22:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Cephalanthus occidentalis occidentalis1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 20:27:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Rubiaceae
Info: Common buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis occidentalis); all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Could be sharper, but I don't care. The compo and light of these corona-like plant balls is gorgeous. --Cart (talk) 20:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Very nice. -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 22:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I might add a bit more sharpening but this is a nice shot and a good unusual subject. Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support One of the better-composed plant photos I've seen. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I never knew that the Coronavirus could grow so big. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I also think the composition is what sets this one appart - Benh (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I wonder how long it will be before people start calling this a "virus tree" . Daniel Case (talk) 16:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Rhacophorus kio.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 17:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Family_:_Rhacophoridae_(Shrub_Frogs)
Info created - uploaded by Rushenb - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Closed eyes don't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support DoF is a tiny bit shallow but still a really nice capture. Cmao20 (talk) 23:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -Killarnee (C•T•U) 15:06, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 23:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Good composition. Closed eye is OK for me. Is the frog asleep? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Sorry, the eyes are wide open. Only the pupils are contracted, caused by light (see also here and here) --Llez (talk) 06:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 16:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 23:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:06, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Gebänderte Prachtlibelle auf Pusteblume am NSG Gülper See.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 17:03:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Calopterygidae_(Demoiselles)
Info created - uploaded by Sven Damerow - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Not a patch on the technical quality of this photographer's exisiting FP of this species Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose Very nice compo and sharp everywhere apart from the thorax, therefore a weak oppose Poco a poco (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I agree that some parts are sharper than others but this is still a good, high-resolution, well-composed macro shot. The composition is IMO sufficiently different from the other one Charles links to for it to be worth featuring. Cmao20 (talk) 23:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I think the wing here has more detail than the other FP. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support IMHO sufficiently different from the exisiting FP, here the nice background colours and the dandelion (?) add much to the ‘wow’. --Aristeas (talk) 14:33, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support But where are the Metadata gone? --Llez (talk) 06:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 23:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Filhote de Jacaré.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 15:27:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Alligatoridae (Alligators and Caimans)
Info created and uploaded by LeonardoRamos - nominated by ArionEstar -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 15:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 15:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose I like the composition, but the sharpness is poor and it is very noisy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose Nice shot and not too far off FP but I agree with Charles that the noise is a little bit much. Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Not great IMO and more water than necessary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:06, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Gsengscharte 20200622.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 10:18:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Styria
Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment This picture does not have an immediate "wow" for me, but looking at it closer, one first notices the natural side with the rocks, and only later how there are nine (!) way markings leading the hiker and the eye to the top. --Domob (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Domob (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Yes, I see what you're going for. Maybe a little low on the wow but overall I think it's unusual and interesting enough to feature. Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Interesting and unusual. Buidhe (talk) 23:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Not sufficiently intesting to me I'm afraid. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Not really outstanding --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Per above, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 01:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support An example for redundance --Llez (talk) 06:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others. JukoFF (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Vaste Judaspenning (Lunaria rediviva) 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 17:37:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Brassicaceae
Info Pleasantly scented flowers of a Lunaria rediviva. Location. Garden sanctuary JonkerValley.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support - Bijay chaurasia (talk) 20:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Good composition and quality. Cmao20 (talk) 22:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 08:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose I don't think this one is one of our finest images and the shot is easy, not a FP to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 20:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:55, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Not a great composition to me, though nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a Poco. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Сурок черношапочный (камчатский).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 10:20:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info created and uploaded by NadezhdaKhaustova - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 10:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- KSK (talk) 10:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Info This picture was nominated as part of a set- nomination "Black-capped marmots" and received 6 support before I withdrew this nomination due to Charlesjsharp remarks. --KSK (talk) 10:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment It's a nice composition of an adult with a juvenile, but not sharp enough for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose good picture, but not sharp enough. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per my vote on the original nomination. Wrt sharpness, I don't think it's a focus issue, it's just perhaps a bit too little sharpness has been applied to it in processing. But that is easily fixed, and I'd rather an undersharpened JPEG than an oversharpened one. Cmao20 (talk) 22:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per my remark on the set. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --StellarHalo (talk) 02:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose good picture, but.... JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support The quality is not the best for the exemplar in the back (given that the first one is on focus) but hey, it's a 600 mm shot and the compo is one of the best we have in that FP category Poco a poco (talk) 19:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Ferdinand Hodler - Der Genfersee von Chexbres aus.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 05:43:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info Landscape painting Der Genfersee von Chexbres aus (Lake Geneva as seen from Chexbres) by Swiss symbolist painter Ferdinand Hodler in his personal style known as "parallelism". Painted in 1905 at the time period when various modernist movements were revolutionizing the world of Western art and landscape paintings were becoming a less dominant genre. created by Ferdinand Hodler - uploaded by StellarHalo - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 05:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- StellarHalo (talk) 05:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Important artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 22:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support IMHO Hodler is somewhat underestimated. --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:58, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Andrei (talk) 11:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 23:06, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 045.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 00:22:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
Info I don't usually give my photos a title, but I like to call this one: "A Walk to the Moon." -- all by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Buidhe (talk) 04:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 13:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Nice scene but not extraordinary to me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poco a poco (talk • contribs)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I like the concept. Cmao20 (talk) 22:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak support Normally I would oppose a scene lacking in wow like this one but, I like the idea behind it in combination with the title you came up with --StellarHalo (talk) 04:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support First I thought the light was a bit boring, but looking at it in detail and following the trail to the moon convinced me. --Aristeas (

talk) 09:06, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Weak oppose Per Poco. It is a nice scene, but is missing something extra to make it "wow" for me. --Domob (talk) 10:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others. Very good but not IMO an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose little wow - Benh (talk) 16:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per others. JukoFF (talk) 23:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Nieuw blad van een beuk (Fagus sylvatica). 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2020 at 05:27:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae New beech leaf.
Info Fresh new leaf of a beech (Fagus sylvatica) in mild morning light.The mild morning light creates a pleasant atmosphere in my opinion.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose A QI, yes, but it doesn't stand out enough for me to consider it an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support The light is what makes the difference here. Cmao20 (talk) 16:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose it's nice, but per Daniel. --Ivar (talk) 19:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Oppose DoF is too shallow for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per Daniel Poco a poco (talk) 14:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per Ikan Kekek. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support For me it is special because it captures the delicacy of the young leaves, thanks to the tender light and to the shallow DoF. --Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Annapurna Massif-IMG 5221-Pano.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2020 at 17:44:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support Looks good. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Comment Very good, but not geo-coded. Can you please add the location coordinates! --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Done Thank you @Uoaei1: for review. Location added --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 16:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:29, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

weak oppose I'm going to dissent. It's nice, but not exceptional panorama with a midday light and a bland composition - Benh (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support I don't think Benh's oppose is unreasonable, but I find enough to enjoy looking at the panorama in high resolution, even if the composition could maybe be a bit more interesting. Cmao20 (talk) 16:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

71 Mpx crispy sharp image: very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
weak oppose per Benh. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
weak oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 14:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose per others --StellarHalo (talk) 02:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak support Benh's oppose is reasonable, but also is a nice panorama. --Gnosis (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose lack of detail. --Ivar (talk) 15:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Question where do you find the lack of detail Ivar? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Comment look at grass, it's unnatural. --Ivar (talk) 06:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Support--Sabina Bajracharya (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Conical shadow of Mount Nam Xay over green trees at golden hour, South-West view from the top, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2020 at 01:00:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support I find this shadow striking and the sunlight harmoniously spread around like a theater spot -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support Nice idea. Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Green version of Adam's Peak 🌲🌲🌲 :-) Basile Morin (talk) 13:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

The resemblance is actually pretty uncanny! Cmao20 (talk) 16:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Adam's Peak being in the water, it allows the sun's rays to reach it really very early. But similar idea :-) Basile Morin (talk) 22:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support Ordinarily I'd find the shadow distracting but it's so perfect here. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

★⭑⭑⭑⭑ 🌄 ⭑⭑⭑⭑★ :-) Basile Morin (talk) 13:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Support --Llez (talk) 06:07, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Oppose quite nice and interesting idea, but the (light on the) background is a bit too distracting to make this photo very "special", in summary the half top is not very very nice. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Christian here Poco a poco (talk) 14:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per Christian Ferrer. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment In my opinion the light on the background is fine, but the shadow at the right on the mountains can be competitive. It comes from another peak behind. However, the shadow on the trees (left and right) accentuates the impression of light centered in the middle -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

A crop that makes the shadow more central. Pinging the previous voters @Johann Jaritz, Cmao20, The Cosmonaut, Aristeas, Daniel Case: @Llez, Christian Ferrer, Poco a poco, Fischer.H: Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Fine by me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Much clearer focus. The clouds are lovely in isolation, but distract from the main message of this image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Neutral a bit improved, but still not enough eye catching IMO. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Both versions are fine for me. --Aristeas (talk) 14:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment: I prefer the original version. The sky makes for a more pleasing composition. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment It doesn't convince me either, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Tiefenstürmig Feuersalamander -20200314-RM-171544.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2020 at 20:32:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Family : Salamandridae (True Salamanders)
Info Fire salamander in a stream in the Franconian Switzerland that dries up in summer. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Oppose A QI deservedly, but this just doesn't do it for me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Question how could u get a salamander to remain still for a close up stack like this? - Benh (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Info @Benh: @Cmao20: I stood with the tripod in shallow water and the camera was mounted upside down to be close enough above the water surface. The animal moves about as slowly as a toad and always pauses for a moment. Of course you need a little bit of luck.--Ermell (talk) 08:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  - Support Thanks. It's an amazing shot. - Benh (talk) 18:28, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Support I'm impressed. Look at the animal's head, in particular. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Strong support Really excellent for me. Beautiful creature and it's extraordinary that you have managed to get a focus stack with everything so sharp. I have no idea how you even began to achieve that. Cmao20 (talk) 15:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support per Ikan and Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 06:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Support Great shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Great colors, shoot, focus and lovely animal --Wilfredor (talk) 02:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 12:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Commons:特色靚相候選

正式嘅事物[edit]

提名[edit]

特色靚相候選方針[edit]

提名[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Christophorus 03.jpg[edit]

File:Gurung child at Upper Sinuwa during Annapurna Base camp trek in a Tea house-2972.jpg[edit]

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img62 Ortaköy Mosque.jpg[edit]

File:Theyyam at peeleri vayanaattukulavan kaavu 03.jpg[edit]

File:Browning Range during winter sunrise, Lake Kaniere Scenic Reserve, West Coast, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

File:Luz Train Station, Sao Paulo.jpg[edit]

Alt cut[edit]

File:Ottoman surrender of Jerusalem restored.jpg (delist)[edit]

File:Isojärvi panorama 3.jpg[edit]

File:Aina-kari near Zarih of Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg[edit]

File:Maroc Marrakech Jemaa-el-Fna Luc Viatour.JPG[edit]

File:2017-02-02 APRIL MORAN - IMO 9373711.jpg[edit]

File:Chichester Cathedral Choir, West Sussex, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

File:Landscape of Luang Prabang with a temporary wooden footbridge.jpg[edit]

File:Wroclaw- Ratusz, wieza.jpg[edit]

File:Anas platyrhynchos - Weiherwald - Karlsruhe 05.jpg[edit]

File:Dörzbach - Hohebach - Jüdischer Friedhof - Detailansicht 1.jpg[edit]

File:Hazel MacKaye and dog by Harris & Ewing.jpg[edit]

File:2019W3046 - Львів.jpg[edit]

File:Boletus erythropus 2010 G1.jpg (delist)[edit]

File:Clouds reflected in a bay with jellyfish infestation at Rågårdsdal.jpg[edit]

File:Ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta).jpg[edit]

Mossy leaf-tailed gecko (Uroplatus sikorae)[edit]

File:Crucibulum laeve - Vieux-Sautour2.jpg[edit]

File:Wooden bench swing and wicker hammocks on a bamboo footbridge in paddy fields a sunny day during the monsoon, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg[edit]

File:A large cabbage.jpg[edit]

File:Historisches Hammerwerk am Blautopf-Abfluss.jpg[edit]

File:Wetland - Weiherwald - Karlsruhe 11.jpg[edit]

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker -- 2020 -- 8874 (bw).jpg[edit]

File:Longsheng Rice Terraces November 2017 014.jpg[edit]

File:Murión (Gymnothorax unicolor), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 49.jpg[edit]

File:Pez lagarto diamante (Synodus synodus), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 44.jpg[edit]

File:Pergola - Point Pelee National Park.jpg[edit]

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bereich der US Army -- 2020 -- 8893.jpg[edit]

File:Vieux Limoilou, Québec city, Canadá 02.jpg[edit]

File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran2.jpg[edit]

File:Cephalanthus occidentalis occidentalis1.jpg, featured[edit]

File:Rhacophorus kio.jpg[edit]

File:Gebänderte Prachtlibelle auf Pusteblume am NSG Gülper See.jpg[edit]

File:Filhote de Jacaré.jpg, not featured[edit]

File:Gsengscharte 20200622.jpg[edit]

File:Vaste Judaspenning (Lunaria rediviva) 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg[edit]

File:Сурок черношапочный (камчатский).jpg[edit]

File:Ferdinand Hodler - Der Genfersee von Chexbres aus.jpg[edit]

File:Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 045.jpg[edit]

File:Nieuw blad van een beuk (Fagus sylvatica). 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg[edit]

File:Annapurna Massif-IMG 5221-Pano.jpg[edit]

File:Conical shadow of Mount Nam Xay over green trees at golden hour, South-West view from the top, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg[edit]

Alternative[edit]

File:Tiefenstürmig Feuersalamander -20200314-RM-171544.jpg, featured[edit]

Navigation menu

Search