Commons:特色靚相候選
Shortcut: COM:FPC Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−
要知道之前有乜提名,睇睇:Commons:等色靚相/紀錄
正式嘅事物
[edit]提名
[edit]如果您認為您已經創作或搵到一張可能有價值的圖片,請將佢加到「提名」部分嘅最頂部。用呢個連結加入。
喺您提名之前,請肯定已經喺相應的圖片加上適當嘅版權標籤。
請喺投票嘅時候利用您嘅語言或者使用下面嘅模板:
- 支持 - Support, Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, ...
- 反對 - Oppose, No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, ...
另外,您亦可以使用模板{{Oppose}}同{{Support}}
您亦可以表達使用{{I love}}代表您喜歡呢張圖片或您想利用{{Neutral}}嚟表達您嘅睇法。
特色靚相候選方針
[edit]- 14 日投票持間。結果將會喺提名後嘅第 15 日公佈決定。
- 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅提名
- 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅討論貢獻
- 匿名貢獻者嘅投票不作計算
- 提名者不會計作票數。必須另作解釋作出支持。
- 記住,Wikimedia Commons 計劃嘅目標係提供一個中央式嘅檔案庫,以提供所有 Wikimedia 計劃(包括未來的計劃)裏使用。呢個唔只係於置 Wikipedia 嘅圖片,因此呢啲圖片唔係只針對嗰個計劃作出決定。
要成功登上特色靚相,必須合乎以下嘅條件。
- 合理嘅牌照 (當然)
- 最少 5 張支持票
- 支持/反對嘅比例最少為 2:1 (三分二多數,即最少 67% 支持)
有關點樣處理舊嘅提名,睇睇Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished。
更新呢一頁:purge this page's cache
提名
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 22:31:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Family : Odontodactylidae
Info Peacock mantis shrimp (Odontodactylus scyllarus), Anilao, Philippines. This species ranges in size from 3–18 centimetres (1.2–7.1 in) and is a burrower, constructing U-shaped holes in the loose substrate near the bases of coral reefs in water ranging from 3–40 metres (9.8–131.2 ft). It's a smasher, with club-shaped raptorial appendages. An agile and active intertidal and sub-intertidal predator, it prefers gastropods, crustaceans, and bivalves, and will repeatedly deliver blunt force to the exoskeleton of its prey until it can gain access to the underlying soft tissue for consumption. It is reported to have a "punch" of over 80 km/h (50 miles/h), the fastest recorded punch of any living animal. The acceleration is similar to that in a .22 LR bullet fired from a handgun. Note: after reading this I definitely believe that I got too close to it. A smash would have broken my port lens and (by flooding) the camera and lens. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 22:16:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 22:16, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 22:16, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Amazingly beautiful picture with crisp reflections and lovely composition but just to check, the far-away tower on the right actually does lean like that? Just checking it's not perspective distortion Cmao20 (talk) 22:32, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Indeed; the tower on the right is leaning in reality. --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 21:21:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism
Info Went to photograph a lake; came home with bike rack photo. Life as usual for a wiki photographer. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:21, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 21:21, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support A splash of fun in the world Cmao20 (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 15:29:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Books_and_Paper
Info digitized by the Polish Central Archives of Historical Records, uploaded by Lukasz Truscinski, nominated by Yann
Info Janusz, prince of Wisła, Warsaw, Zakroczym and Ciechanów, grants the citizens of Warsaw the privilege to build a bathhouse and allocates the income from it to the needs of the city, 26 July 1376.
Support Historical document is very high resolution. -- Yann (talk) 15:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Super high quality and interesting Cmao20 (talk) 22:30, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 13:44:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Cyprinidae (Carps and Allies)
Info Koi in a garden pond. (Or, selfie in the morning before my coffee.) Additional info given by the pond's owner: Due to the cold climate, the koi live in an indoor pond during the cold seasons. In spring they are moved to the outdoor pond. During the first days outside, the koi are sensitive to the strong sunlight, so the water is kept 'murky' with a fish-friendly coloring to provide shade and an awning is placed over the pond. This was one of those days. When they have adapted to the sunlight, the water will be filtered and cleared. These koi are about 0.7 m (2.3 ft) long. All by me, W.carter -- Cart (talk) 13:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 13:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Ugly fish, but interesting. And your comment made it. --Yann (talk) 15:17, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Fascinating pond monster photographed really well under difficult circumstances. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:53, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:21, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I think it's cute! Cmao20 (talk) 22:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 12:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 12:23, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 12:23, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
*
Oppose I'm sorry, I'm sure this looked amazing when seeing it IRL but per what I said below on the other nom, illumination like this will wipe out details in photos and it's not working here. There are too many layers of black/dark elements and it comes out a bit messy for me. A closer crop might have been better. --Cart (talk) 12:54, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. The certain restlessness in Hochofenstraße is due to the many elements along the street. This underlines the former bustle - in my opinion. BTW: At daylight there are much more rusty steel. --XRay 💬 14:14, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- I have taken up your idea with the smaller crop. Thank you for this idea. I think the photo will benefit from it. --XRay 💬 14:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support That calmed things down considerably, thanks. Changed to support. And to answer your BTW, lots of rusty steel in daylight usually works since it's more subdued and uniform in color and daylight will be kinder to details. A really cool place, similar to Furillen on Gotland that I often used for model photos. I can spend weeks in places like these. :-) --Cart (talk) 15:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- The landscape park is also often used for filming. Scenes from “Tribute to Panem” were filmed there. When we were there now, filming was underway for “Babylon Berlin”. --XRay 💬 15:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 11:42:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking! A good thing the objects are so big, since illuminations like these tend to obliterate details in photos, but here it works. --Cart (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Amazing color composition --Kritzolina (talk) 18:55, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Kritzolina Cmao20 (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:33, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 10:41:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
Info created by Sanjoykumar99 – uploaded by Sanjoykumar99 – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support A bit over-sharpened, but the compo is picture-perfect. --Cart (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support For me it is often about the colors when I support a picture - and I really love the blues and greens here. And of course it a very well executed bird shots in other areas as well. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart Cmao20 (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:34, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 03:39:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info Beautiful photo of this thirteenth century German cathedral. I like the effect that the sweeping clouds have in making the architecture look dramatic and impressive. No FPs from this place. created by A.Savin – uploaded by A.Savin – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Not easy to take. Well done and outstanding in my eyes. --Milseburg (talk) 11:06, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Milseburg, well done Alexander and thanks to Cmao20. --Terragio67 (talk) 11:16, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 12:24, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks Cmao20 for nominating it --A.Savin 13:46, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 03:39:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Other land vehicles
Info IMO a really good and well composed 'action photo' of a harvest. I have placed it into the 'land vehicles' gallery as there are two other FPs of combine harvesters in there already (neither as good as this one in my opinion) but there's an argument it should be in the 'agriculture' gallery, please change if you think that'd be better. created by Ermell – uploaded by Ermell – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Not the most artistic compo, but that is very hard to do with these harvester (I've tried!) and the technical quality and isolation of the subject more than makes up for it. Gallery is fine for me. --Cart (talk) 12:35, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:15, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 18:24, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nom Cmao20--Ermell (talk) 22:43, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
File:Deux enfants regardent depuis les ruines des remparts du château, Saint-Lô, July 1944.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2025 at 09:32:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
Info created by US Army, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Info Two children watch, from the ruins of the castle ramparts on the north slope, the passage of an American Jeep preceded by a Citroën traction avant on the rue des Noyers located between the upper town, on the left and the Dollée.
- The children are two brothers: Max and Jean Robin 12 and 8 years old. Their father is Raymond Robin, a resistance fighter executed by the Germans on June 15, 1944 in Beaucoudray. In the background an armored vehicle with GIs and at the top left the Agneaux college. In the background on the left, the Institut Libre d'Agneaux where the Germans began to dig an air-raid shelter from 1943 in the basement (now completely flooded and inaccessible), so at about the same time as the underground. This shelter, which was still not finished before the Germans left, had a total length of 135 meters and a width of 2 meters, with 6 rooms. General der Artillerie Erich Marcks commander of the LXXXIV AK used it as his HQ until his death on June 12, 1944, but it is not known why and when he left the castle of Commines.
- A German garrison occupied these places upon their arrival in June 1940 and from June 19 it was one of the four French prisoner of war camps in Saint-Lô (Frontstalag) until these prisoners were sent to Germany in November 1940.
- This is the place. Taken from nearly the same place 70 years later.
Support -- Yann (talk) 09:32, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2025 at 10:31:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
Info Heath and protected area Neuer Hagen on the northern slope of the Clemensberg in the Sauerland. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 10:31, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 10:31, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support The earthy, subdued colors at this time of year are unique to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks like a classical painting Cmao20 (talk) 03:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Well depicted. --Terragio67 (talk) 11:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support The light got me. --Cart (talk) 13:21, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2025 at 08:12:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Composites (Multiple images merged into one)
Info a SSB-Drag-Bike. The aerodynamic full fairing is designed to be transparent for a better view to the technology. created by Auge=mit – uploaded by Auge=mit – nominated by Auge=mit -- Auge=mit (talk) 08:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. -- Auge=mit (talk) 08:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:23, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support A very cool and interesting illustration of such bikes. I see that there is a bit of a difference (center front hole) where some parts of the bike have moved a bit between the shots, and as a result they are "doubled". Has any part of the image been created by some computer program or is it just two images merged? --Cart (talk) 12:04, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment it is all photoshop/handmade (two pictures on different layers plus some layers for the shadows)... an other version can be seen at commons (for a better understanding) best regards, --Auge=mit (talk) 15:58, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! A very good job with the photos, very creative and certainly not something we usually see here. I've added links between the different versions on the file pages for easier viewing.--Cart (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- thanks to you too for finding the perfect gallery… Auge=mit (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! A very good job with the photos, very creative and certainly not something we usually see here. I've added links between the different versions on the file pages for easier viewing.--Cart (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice work.--Ermell (talk) 18:21, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks really cool. Was the Wikipedia wordmark added digitally? dllu (talk) 00:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it‘s digitally, because i found a lot of common-pictures on different websites without any appropriate credit - as required by the license… best regards, Auge=mit (talk) 01:13, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- if the „WP-watermark“ is against the rules, i can easily hide the layer in photoshop…--Auge=mit (talk) 01:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's not against any rules but in this case with all the other stickers and advertising on the bike, it could be interpreted as if Wikipedia is sponsoring the bike and its driver, and that is misleading. I suggest you remove it. "Watermarking" images like this is not something that is done for the reason you are giving. Non-credited Commons pictures needs to be dealt with in other ways. --Cart (talk) 12:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- if the „WP-watermark“ is against the rules, i can easily hide the layer in photoshop…--Auge=mit (talk) 01:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool stuff Cmao20 (talk) 03:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2025 at 23:30:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 23:30, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 23:30, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 12:13, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Definitely FP-level composition, and superb resolution and detail. I'm not sure about the washed-out, greyish light on the building on the left. Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- There was a street lamp just out of frame there and it was foggy. dllu (talk) 04:54, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 11:25, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2025 at 17:10:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
Info Fish crow (Corvus ossifragus), cousin of the far more common American crow. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 17:10, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:10, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose While it is a technically decent capture, it's an ordinary photo of a relatively common bird. This seems to be precisely the kind of thing that Quality Image was designed for. dllu (talk) 23:33, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Detail, quality, and simple clear composition are sufficient for FP for me Cmao20 (talk) 00:11, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Agree, no the easiest subject to get a good focus of but it's tto simple and detail level not high for such a common subject. Poco a poco (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2025 at 12:36:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info A white breasted kingfisher in flight. Created, uploaded by Ehsan Ali Biswas – nominated by Redmyname31 -- ツredmyname 💬 12:36, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ツredmyname 💬 12:36, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support You have a good eye for selecting nominations, now it's time for you to also be just as good at fixing the descriptions for the photos you nominate. It's up to you as nominator to make the nom as good as possible. People who are looking for photos here on Commons, still have to rely on the written descriptions on the file's page. We don't have image recognition in the search tool yet. So to make the image "findable" and make sure it is used, every file needs a good description, especially those with some award. I have helped you with these two noms, I think that you can do this yourself in the future. ;-) --Cart (talk) 13:11, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Cart Thanks a lot for enlightening me, I'll keep this in mind. ツredmyname 💬 16:25, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Ehsan Ali Biswas (talk) 15:27, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:29, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:57, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rocky Masum (talk) 18:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:10, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:21, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:00, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:46, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2025 at 09:09:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittaculidae_(True_Parrots)
Info A male plum-headed parakeet (Psittacula cyanocephala) landing on sorghum plant. Created, uploaded by Sanjoykumar99 – nominated by Redmyname31 -- ツredmyname 💬 09:09, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ツredmyname 💬 09:09, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 10:53, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Very well frozen! ~Moheen (keep talking) 11:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:13, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 11:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:43, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 11:48, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:36, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Outstanding, not just a difficult capture but a very attractive composition Cmao20 (talk) 00:09, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:24, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:00, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
File:Pez payaso zorrillo (Amphiprion akallopisos) en una anémona magnífica (Heteractis magnifica), Zanzíbar, Tanzania, 2024-05-29, DD 02.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2025 at 07:44:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)
Info Nosestripe clownfish (Amphiprion akallopisos) in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Zanzibar, Tanzania. Note: we have no FPs of this species of clownfish. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:44, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:44, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 10:53, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:17, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 11:27, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:34, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Very sharp on the fish, and a great composition Cmao20 (talk) 00:09, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:24, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:42, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:27, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2025 at 12:45:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Rallidae (Coots, Rails and Crakes)
Info created by Tarik Hasan – uploaded by Tarik Hasan – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I suspect bird photo experts will have something to say about focus, eye, sharpness, detail, whatever, but it's nevertheless a great action shot. There is an odd patch of texture on the left wing, perhaps you could have a look at it. --Cart (talk) 13:04, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:32, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:48, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I don't see any issues with the focus Cmao20 (talk) 14:16, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 19:53, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 10:54, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:14, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:47, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Info It's oversharpened. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rocky Masum (talk) 18:06, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:38, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2025 at 12:21:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Serbia
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 14:15, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:38, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2025 at 08:53:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
Info Coronation of the Virgin (in the center), Saint Peter (left), and Paul the Apostle (right), main altar, parish church St. Genesius, Riedböhringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. To prevent a discussion: The three blue columns on the left side of the altar are also not exactly vertical in reality; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:53, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:53, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:28, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Very beautiful, but the perspective seems a little strange to me. I'm struggling to find much in the picture that's either symmetrical or properly straight. Cmao20 (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Info You are right, this old baroque altar is not symmetrical at all. You can compare it with this and this picture from another autor, taken from different angles, where you see the same asymmetries. It is therefore not caused by the angel of view or the photographer, but of the real assymetry of the altar, caused by the (unknown) artist who created the altar. --Llez (talk) 15:19, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think I would prefer a photo like the first one you link to (though of course of higher quality). This one is too close and it just looks strange to me. Lacking the context of the overall appearance of the altar makes the asymmetries appear disorienting Cmao20 (talk) 15:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 10:54, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:15, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
--Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Oppose Leaning to the right.
Comment Please check the horizontal lines (e.g. using the grid or auxiliary lines of Photoshop). They are exactly level! --Llez (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment I remove my opposing vote. I agree, this ok. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:27, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
File:Chacal de lomo negro (Lupulella mesomelas), reserva natural Masái Mara, Kenia, 2024-05-20, DD 07.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2025 at 20:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info Black-backed jackal (Lupulella mesomelas schmidti), Masai Mara, Kenya. The black-backed jackal has occupied eastern and southern Africa for at least 2–3 million years, as shown by fossil deposits in Kenya, Tanzania, and South Africa. This omnivore occupies a wide range of habitats, from arid coastal deserts to areas with more than 2000 mm of rainfall. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Good sharpness and composition Cmao20 (talk) 23:00, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:48, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 10:55, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:25, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2025 at 13:37:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Clothing and Textiles
Info All by me, -- Cart (talk) 13:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 13:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice arrangement Cmao20 (talk) 16:51, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Original picture An insect photographer (talk) 17:32, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 19:12, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Clean background, good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:08, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good, and something different. Yann (talk) 09:13, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:30, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:52, 13 March 2025 (UTC) ^
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support funny! --Harlock81 (talk) 13:50, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 20:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 10:55, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:59, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support by others.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:57, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2025 at 06:04:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)
Info A Rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri) and her two chicks in tree hole. Created & uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by আফতাবুজ্জামান -- আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 06:04, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 06:04, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 09:51, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment There seems to be a green cast. Fixable? Yann (talk) 16:00, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Great composition but less than great quality Cmao20 (talk) 16:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 20:08, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:27, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2025 at 23:21:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
Info created by Sofiane mohammed amri – nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Nice picture. The crop is too tight for the bus, but it is not for the windshield. There are also some technical flaws. The interior of the bus is too dark, while the sky is overexposed. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:01, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Yaqub Qomarudin Dibiazah (talk) 16:16, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:36, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2025 at 19:06:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Fringillidae_(Finches_and_Allies)
Info American goldfinch (Spinus tristis) at a feeder. Feeder shot, but the comp/detail/light seem worth a nom. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes feeder shot, but since the feeder is color-coded for this bird, I don't mind. Well balanced. --Cart (talk) 23:49, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:42, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition. Per Cart, the feeder's colour is quite helpful here Cmao20 (talk) 16:40, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:34, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:24, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2025 at 21:06:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Windows
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support I've seen a lot of similar photos to this one but I do like the light here, plus the splash of green in the bottom right to break up the regularity of the shapes Cmao20 (talk) 19:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 19:46, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality and a nice photo, but it doesn't pass the bar of wow or originality for me for an FP. Sorry. --Cart (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose What cart said. Also, as a nitpick, the perspective correction isn't perfect --- the top edge is sloping down towards the left. The sharpness is also not perfect but that's expected for a perspective corrected photo like this. I generally like architecture shots like this, though. dllu (talk) 04:49, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2025 at 16:23:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Norway
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:23, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:23, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:59, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:10, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sorry, nice light and good quality but neither an outstanding composition nor motif for me. I feel like the vantage point seems too high so I seem to be looking down at the dock from somewhere above it, and that has the effect of highlighting the somewhat chaotic background. I will withdraw this vote if I'm the only dissenting voice so as to enable five-day promotion. Cmao20 (talk) 19:41, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support for the originality of this little floating sauna, humble among all those yachts. --Cart (talk) 23:59, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:31, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:35, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:24, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2025 at 12:54:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info Rose Pavilion, Pavlovsk, Saint Petersburg created and uploaded by Никонико962 - nominated by FBilula (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FBilula (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I don't really like the shadows but there's enough in the architecture, quality, and colours for me to support Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 19:42, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support-- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:24, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment the perspective correction wasn't done perfectly as both sides are still leaning inwards slightly. dllu (talk) 03:02, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:24, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2025 at 12:56:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Russia
Info Grand Cascade of en:Peterhof Palace, Saint Petersburg created and uploaded by Елена Нечипоренко - nominated by FBilula (talk) 12:56, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FBilula (talk) 12:56, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 20:00, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:12, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:41, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:53, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, to me the crop looks to random and unbalenced for a FP. --Milseburg (talk) 17:55, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 19:41, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support One of the most vibrant and dynamic castle photos I've seen here. Very refreshing. --Cart (talk) 00:05, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --per Cart Famberhorst (talk) 18:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:19, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:25, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2025 at 18:36:48
-
Older version
-
Newer version
Info I propose to delist the featured image and replace it with an image taken from a different angle, in better lighting conditions, following the criticisms in the original nomination. (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:36, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace In the new picture, several parts are better represented in both light conditions and definition with respect to the one already featured. Thanks for it. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace Per above Poco a poco (talk)•
Delist and replace per above Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace per experts. --Thi (talk) 16:37, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace --imehling (talk) 17:48, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace --Cart (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:25, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2025 at 16:02:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment In this case I think it would be better to go for the center of mass for the whole structure, and put that in the middle of the photo, rather than just using the tower. See note, what do you think? --Cart (talk) 00:10, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- "Photo as is" better displays the composition of the castle and the hill on which it is located. In case of cropping the hill loses its expressiveness -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:37, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- It makes sense, but I would also like to keep the hill on the left because castle location is more representative in this case. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:09, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 02:12, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Per Cart.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:38, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:26, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2025 at 09:30:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 09:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- imehling (talk) 09:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Majestic view Cmao20 (talk) 01:35, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 02:11, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:04, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and rarely shown mountain landscap. An insect photographer (talk) 19:29, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:26, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:12, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:26, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2025 at 23:11:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 23:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 23:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose
Support I agree the sharpness could be better but the resolution is huge Cmao20 (talk) 01:33, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Right. Resolution of the picture is massive so I think my oppose was too harsh. --imehling (talk) 08:15, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:22, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral The color compo here is great and sharpness is fine. The resolution is almost ridiculously big for such a motif, and if you downsize it by 50% it will be fine and about the usual size for car photos. Seems like a lot of new cameras that yields these big files, don't really put a lot of extra detail or information in them. However, I agree with Imehling, less road and more tree would have been better for me. (Most of all less road.) --Cart (talk) 00:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- There's plenty of detail in the front of the car which is in focus. And there is definitely more detail or information in high resolution photos. Just don't pixel peep at 100% --- print it out at 2 m width and compare it side by side against a 24 megapixel photo and the difference is stark. dllu (talk) 01:40, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:26, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2025 (UTC)