Commons:特色靚相候選

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:FPC Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−

呢度係成為特色靚相嘅候選區。請留意呢度唔係同每日靚相一樣

要知道之前有乜提名,睇睇:Commons:等色靚相/紀錄

正式嘅事物[edit]

提名[edit]

如果您認為您已經創作或搵到一張可能有價值的圖片,請將佢加到「提名」部分嘅最頂部。用呢個連結加入。

喺您提名之前,請肯定已經喺相應的圖片加上適當嘅版權標籤

請喺投票嘅時候利用您嘅語言或者使用下面嘅模板

  • 支持 - Support, Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, ...
  • 反對 - Oppose, No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, ...

另外,您亦可以使用模板{{Oppose}}同{{Support}}

您亦可以表達使用{{I love}}代表您喜歡呢張圖片或您想利用{{Neutral}}嚟表達您嘅睇法。

特色靚相候選方針[edit]

  • 14 日投票持間。結果將會喺提名後嘅第 15 日公佈決定。
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅提名
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅討論貢獻
  • 匿名貢獻者嘅投票不作計算
  • 提名者不會計作票數。必須另作解釋作出支持。
  • 記住,Wikimedia Commons 計劃嘅目標係提供一個中央式嘅檔案庫,以提供所有 Wikimedia 計劃(包括未來的計劃)裏使用。呢個唔只係於置 Wikipedia 嘅圖片,因此呢啲圖片唔係只針對嗰個計劃作出決定。

要成功登上特色靚相,必須合乎以下嘅條件。

  • 合理嘅牌照 (當然)
  • 最少 5 張支持票
  • 支持/反對嘅比例最少為 2:1 (三分二多數,即最少 67% 支持)

有關點樣處理舊嘅提名,睇睇Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished

更新呢一頁:purge this page's cache

提名[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Symphorichthys spilurus - Wilhelma 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2022 at 05:32:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sailfin snapper (Symphorichthys spilurus), Wilhelma, Stuttgart

File:Múlafossur2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 21:06:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Múlafossur

File:F-35 Heritage Flight Team performs in Bell Fort Worth Alliance AirShow.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 20:18:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

F-35 Heritage Flight Team performs in Bell Fort Worth Alliance AirShow

File:Fragaria vesca fruit - Keila.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 14:44:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fragaria vesca
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do not understand the question. Shot is done without additional magnification with standard macro lens. Fruit size was ca 8–10 mm. -- Ivar (talk) 13:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ontluikende bloemknoppen van een Agapanthus 'Windlebrook'. 08-07-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 10:30:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flower buds of an Agapanthus

File:Peces fuego diablo (Pterois miles), parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-27, DD 45.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 08:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common lionfishes (Pterois miles), Red Sea, Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt

File:Livraria Lello (49369268093).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 05:14:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Livraria Lello
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Portugal
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sanshiro Kubota - uploaded by Tm - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 05:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IamMM: It's a nice motif but I believe that the quality is not quite there for FP (or QI), too much noise, wrong WB, perspective correction missing,... There are also too many heads around the scene for my taste Poco a poco (talk) 08:41, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Poco. -- -donald- (talk) 10:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination You are right Poco. Maybe later in my spare time I'll be able to fix the noise/perspective/WB problem to some extent and try it again on FPC, but I'm not in a position to do so at the moment. -- IamMM (talk) 10:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • That would be great. thank you -- IamMM (talk) 11:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Yes, it would be great if you could try that, Poco. (I could have tried it, too, but in these weeks I am preparing for a move to another flat and therefore can’t do much image processing.) --Aristeas (talk) 12:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Eiffel Tower in 2022 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 04:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eiffel Tower

File:Composition of the German Bundesrat as a pie chart.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2022 at 20:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Composition of the German Bundesrat. A versatile SVG, which is structured for easy updating with ever changing voting rights as well as seventeen languages. So, among the simple a clear diagram, please consider the practical aspects of maintenance of this chart with every state election in Germany.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Aeroid - uploaded by Aeroid - nominated by Aeroid -- Aeroid (talk) 20:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Aeroid (talk) 20:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain As I do not know the FP protocol for graphics. Urban Versis 32KB(talk | contribs) 22:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question looks very nice at first sight, but gets really confusing once I try to wrap my head around it. What exactly does the area size encode? Is it really the number of seats per party? That doesn't seem to add up. For instance, afaict SPD in Saxony and Linke in Bremen each cannot have more than one seat (they are the weakest of three parties in their state and the states have only 4 and 3 grey rectangles aka seats respectively). So why is the area for SPD in Saxony larger than the area of Linke in Bremen? In other places, I can't even make out which area is larger: Grüne in Bremen or Linke in Berlin? Luckily this is based on an official figure so I don't feel bad about being blunt: Regular pie charts are already bad enough in that regard, but this is almost completely obscure to me. At the very least it needs a much better description. --El Grafo (talk) 08:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC) PS @Aeroid Let me know if I'm somehow missing the point here. Also be aware that it's entirely fine to make adjustments to both the file and the description during the nomination as long as you notify people here. Reply[reply]
    • Turns out I indeed completely missed the point. Apparently, seats from one state are not divided between the parties in a coalition after all. The area representing a party within a state's slice of pie (or donut) is not equivalent to anything. It just depends on the number of seats available (angle) and number of parties in the coalition (number of subdivisions in a slice). This is just a ridiculously convoluted and unintuitive way of transmitting the same information as in File:Bundesrat Sitzverteilung.svg. A great example of design decisions getting in the way of delivering the message. Obviously not Aeroid's fault, who afaict did a great job with the manual SVG. Sorry, but I can only Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose this for being unclear and potentially even misleading. --El Grafo (talk) 10:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      It's not a standard election diagram. It illustrates a rather custom German constitutal body with its particular details of composition and voting procedures.
      But thanks for digging into it and trying to get your head around it. I also did the other diagram you mentioned, which I abandoned due to information of the actual current division of power was encoded on the physical seats. That didn't work on thumbs.
      Just to explain a little bit this choice here: a "slice" is a state, each state has defined number of seats by constitution. The seats are the outer circle grey boxes. This defines the "width" (angle) of the slice.
      A state is ruled by single parties (Saarland) or most commonly coalitions. There are typcially majority parties "leading" teh coalition and get their candidate elected to be the state's head of legislature (Ministerpresident). This majority party is one the outermost position in the slice, taking up most of the "area". the smallest coalition member is on the innermost postion of the slice. For me this is enough info and as much as you could encode. The election results leading to this coaltion are not really relevant after the coalition takes power and divides ministers among them as they decide. The seats here and voting procedure are by law bound together and a stae has to vote as one with all their seats. So I think it well represents this kind of political body. The offical charts on the Bundesrat.de website are very similar, so didn't really invent soemthing new.
      There is a second very similar diagram style the I maintain and can update within 2 minutes which is suitable for even smaller thumbnails.
      As mentioned really not much of an "design", I re-use color choices from the election diagrams on wikide and just put quite some work on easy translation and update capabilities of this.
      But thanks for your feedback, if more people don't get the content (which is complex, can't change german law), I'm happy to consider incorporating it in a further variant. Aeroid (talk) 16:40, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very simple image. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for your feedback, I take that as a compliment. I didn't see a need for any fancyness. I hope you have also considered the SVG code for easy updating and the 17 translations. Aeroid (talk) 20:31, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't see what separates this one from all the other semicircular distribution charts we have of seating and representation in legislative bodies around the world. And it is necessarily subject to change. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rathaus Diedesfeld IMG 0315.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2022 at 16:47:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Town Hall

File:Picos de Europa - Soto de Sajambre - @vilanchelo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2022 at 10:04:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hayedo abrazo León
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Vilanchelo - uploaded by Vilanchelo - nominated by Vilanchelo -- Vilanchelo (talk) 10:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Vilanchelo (talk) 10:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Dim light, vignetting, unnatural contrast and overall look. And really not that interesting an image beyond those. Daniel Case (talk) 16:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC) (Escalating !vote to strong oppose per Kreuzschnabel; I had wanted to do that originally but felt a little sheepish about doing that when mine was the first !vote. Now I see I was right. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 12 August 2022 (UTC))Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Funny idea admittedly, but the image is overexposed, poor quality, uninteresting light, odd-looking vignetting with a decrease in contrast towards the edges, and not the most fortunate composition. Not even QI for me. I cannot see why this should be one of our very very very best pics, sorry. --Kreuzschnabel 21:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Gracias por comentar. Es cierto que la composición no es buena, pero no estoy de acuerdo con respecto a la luz, el viñeteado, que me parece equivocado como he visto en otro comentario tildarlo de "viejo". En cualquier caso, lo tendré en cuenta para las siguientes fotos :) Vilanchelo (talk) 10:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. — Urban Versis 32KB(talk | contribs) 22:19, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Elvis Presley 1958.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2022 at 04:33:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of Elvis Presley.

File:Antieke zwadhark, (long exposure photography) 07-08-2022. (d.j.b) 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2022 at 14:54:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Antique hay rake
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Antique hay rake. (long exposure photography)
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good intentions, but the image does not work for me (and therefore has no wow). Firstly, the machinery is just old but by no means "antique", I’ve seen it still in use. Then, the main subject (according to the file name) is really hardly discernible here, the bottom half being covered in grass and the top part nearly vanishing before the busy shrubbery background (could have easily been avoided by holding the camera a bit higher to place the rake entirely before the bright grass). Third, the device is poor in detail for high levels of visible noise. Fourth, what’s the point of doing a long exposure here in bright light? --Kreuzschnabel 21:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me the brighter look that the long exposure creates actually makes the image more about its late summer mood ... where I live we have just gotten out of our second heat wave of the summer, and with minimal rain over the last month (even given that it is usually our driest month), a lot of exposed unshaded grassy areas are far more golden than green. So this image is what this summer has felt like for me ... bright and sunny, almost to a fault. Which enhances the feeling of this equipment being put out to pasture (literally Face-smile.svg) and neglected ... I don't really see it as the subject, just a part of the overall image's real subject. Daniel Case (talk) 01:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Daniel. — Urban Versis 32KB(talk | contribs) 22:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Honestly I don’t understand the need for a long exposure here, but Daniel is right about the summer mood captured nicely in this photo. And the rusty equipment is like an allegory: this summer is so long that rural equipment rusts and is overgrown by the meadow ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Daniel and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 17:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Scarlet Robin - Mortimer Bay.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2022 at 13:21:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scarlet Robin

File:Tartu asv2022-04 img60 StPeter Church.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2022 at 10:51:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of St. Peter's Church in Tartu
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Estonia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interior view of St. Peter's Church in Tartu, all by me --A.Savin 10:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 10:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral A noise reduction filter was applied excessively, eliminating details (for example, the textures on walls and lamps) and later an excessive sharpening filter was applied, which caused noise especially in the ceiling and in some areas of the wall. I have added some notes --Wilfredor (talk) 11:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful. Time to put Estonia on my travel wishlist. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -– George Chernilevsky talk 17:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose per Wilfredo; the NR seems to have made the stained glass windows at the rear look drawn in. We have a bar for church interiors, and it's been set higher than this. Daniel Case (talk) 22:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Wilfredo, could there maybe be a less sharpened version? Urban Versis 32KB(talk | contribs) 01:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In general I agree with Wilfredo that we should accept more (natural) noise in photos and stop with the habit of excessive noise reduction and oversharpening. But when compared with other photos this photo IMHO shows neither excessive noise reduction nor excessive sharpening. (Of course I would welcome less noise reduction.) --Aristeas (talk) 06:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Blown windows and per Daniel Case. --Ermell (talk) 19:22, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lac des Plagnes 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2022 at 09:01:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lac des Plagnes in commune of Abondance, Haute-Savoie, France

File:Weird Tales August 1926.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2022 at 08:43:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cover of the pulp magazine Weird Tales (August 1926, vol. 8, no. 2) featuring The Woman of the Wood by A. Merritt.

File:Ascaris male 200x section.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2022 at 14:51:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ascaris under microscope
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Other lifeforms
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Massimo brizzi - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful and has a freaky "face" shape, so FP for me. If I had my wish, this would be a full cross section with a full circle of membrane and would be sharper at full size, but what we got is still special and not something you see every day! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Looks like an interesting buffet, too. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A good picture, shure, but 2 points: First, why this random clipping? If the specimen is not completely in the microscope's field of view, it's easy to take several single exposures and then stitch them together as a panorama (I do this with small mollusc shells, for example). And why is the dorsal side not at the top but diagonally to the right, that is, why is the preparation rotated 45°? Second, it would be interesting to know what the picture shows. An explanation of the individual structures would be easy to do with annotations. This image of a transverse section of a mature male could serve as a template. --Llez (talk) 06:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:04, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting coincidental structure :) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others. — Urban Versis 32KB(talk | contribs) 01:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I'd really like it to be complete and labelled, but I can see value in a light-hearted image that may make people a bit more curious about biology. --El Grafo (talk) 09:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Precisely per El Grafo but I find this crop a dealbreaker like Benh would say Poco a poco (talk) 08:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Eiffel Tower in 2022 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2022 at 08:32:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eiffel Tower
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Maksim Sokolov - uploaded by Maksim Sokolov - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 08:32, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 08:32, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This I like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not sure how this is so remarkable. When I was in Paris almost a decade ago, it was pretty easy to get a shot like this so no wow. Also, given that this was taken at night, do we have a FoP issue? (see [2]) --SHB2000 (talk) 10:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The rule of a FP having to be hard to take seems to have been just recently introduced, so I haven’t heard of it yet. Category:Eiffel Tower from immediately beside it has 2 or 3 images from the same spot, and one of them nearly coincident, but at much lower quality in less interesting light … well yes, that’s more a point for VI, but this kind of photo does not seem to be that commonplace then. This one candidate is interesting and impressive for me, a bit soft but we’re talking about 60 megapixels. Still, there’s the FoP issue to clear. --Kreuzschnabel 12:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      I don't think there's a rule, but if it's so easy to take then there's no wow. SHB2000 (talk) 12:23, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per SHB2000. Urban Versis 32KB(talk | contribs) 11:28, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting perspective which makes us see the famous tower in a not-so-common way and emphasizes its structure. I don’t think we should speculate about how difficult a photo is to take – some of our best FPs may be technically simple shots, and on the other hand there can be incredibly complex photos which nevertheless would never make it to a FP for good reasons. However there is still the copyright problem because of the strange French copyright conception. Personally I think this should be fixed in France (i.e., France should finally introduce a working freedom of panorama), but until that I fear we cannot keep such photos … I support this photo here (a) for moral reasons and (b) because I have been told that we should discuss such legal issues in deletion requests etc., not here. --Aristeas (talk) 15:19, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My understanding is that the copyright claim is over the light shows (or if you prefer, special lighting), not the regular yellow light we see here, which couldn't possibly pass any threshold of originality. I believe the light show takes place later at night, not during blue hour. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you, Ikan. That would make sense. I hope this is the correct explanation and we can keep this photo (and similar photos). --Aristeas (talk) 19:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • FYI, there is no daily light show. It only happens on special occasions. Yann (talk) 19:29, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Given what Category:Eiffel Tower at night says, I do not believe we are in the clear here. It has always been my understanding that the lighting design on the tower was commissioned not just for the light show but for any occasion it's all lit up ... watch the credits of any American movie that includes a scene with the Eiffel Tower at night, and you'll see the copyright acknowledged. I didn't find anything in threshold of originality that discusses how France treats it; in a nation lacking FoP I do not think we can make any assumptions. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good details and lights. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:32, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Yosemite National Park (CA, USA), Yosemite Valley, Mirror Lake -- 2022 -- 2815.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2022 at 05:13:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bank of Mirror Lake, Yosemite National Park, California, USA
  • It's the bank of the lake, typical with low water in the summer. --XRay 💬 19:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per King. It seems also a little oversaturated ... kind of like a postcard. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looking for a while at this photo it has grown for me. I like the contrast between the vivid colours of the plants and of the sky and the pale ground and rocks, which corresponds to the fact that here living nature asserts itself in a rather hostile mountain world. --Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Рудник "Мир" спустя 5 лет после затопления, г. Мирный, Республика Саха (Якутия).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2022 at 22:27:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mir mine five years after flooding
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Dear SHB2000, I would like to understand this oppose better, especially because it is a strong one. Do you mean that every photo which contains the sun does hurt your eyes? Or do you refer to the lensflares below of the sun? --Aristeas (talk) 11:08, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Coral cerebro (Platygyra daedalea), parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-27, DD 70.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2022 at 18:22:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brain coral (Platygyra daedalea), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt

File:Édifice Price at night, Quebec city, Canada.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2022 at 15:30:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Édifice Price at night, Quebec city, Canada

File:Breakfast in Île d'Orléans 072.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 15:47:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Desayuno en el albergue de los brazos de morpheo
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Gallery link changed as suggested. (Undo my edit if you disagree ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support A little busy to me, especially on the table. Urban Versis 32KB(talk | contribs) 15:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose While Aristeas is spot on about how this works as a photo, the window muntins, glasses and plates are oversharpened. GA candidate.svg Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Daniel Case I rollbacked any sharpening filter, please could you take another look?. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice object, but that was too much HDR, it needs more light from the window on the table. -- -donald- (talk) 06:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done -donald-, I lowered the HDR to give more light to the table, please, could you take another look?. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, the table top did not change in light, the window and curtain only. -- -donald- (talk) 11:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this image - it feels a bit like a still life, a painting more than a photograph. The colors enhance this feeling. I do not see this as being too busy, the scene is well balanced. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas and Kritzolina. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above. -- IamMM (talk) 04:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the way this looks now, and I like the feeling it gives. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Why did the size change from around 30 Mpixels to 55 Mpx and then back? Yann (talk) 08:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I artificially enlarge the image with Topaz Gigapixel but this created other problems like oversharpening commented by others. --Wilfredor (talk) 10:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ah, so thank you from removing the enlargement again. --Aristeas (talk) 15:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It was an experiment that went wrong, I always try to improve the photos but sometimes one ends up spoiling it. I consider myself more of a photographer than a photoshop editor, I like using stitched photos more than using the fake topaz Gigapixel trick but I wanted to try to see your comments and finally someone commented on what I more or less feared. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for your answer. IMO use of Topaz Gigapixel to enlarge images should be highly discouraged on Commons, and certainly not accepted on FP. Yann (talk) 09:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yann I think that you are right, also Topaz Denoise or any Denoise tool because it's destructive. FPC should accept the noise like we accepted the film grain. --Wilfredor (talk) 12:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Obrigado meu caro. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bambusicola thoracicus Wuhan.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 14:25:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chinese bamboo partridge (Bambusicola thoracicus), photographed in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. This bird is endemic to China, and introduced to Japan.

File:Dents de Morcles au coucher de soleil - juillet 2022.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 09:21:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Dents de Morcles during sunset.

File:Dunes of Reserva Biologica de Santa Isabel - Pirambu - Sergipe - Brasil - 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 04:52:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dunes of Reserva Biologica de Santa Isabel

The Taking of Lungtungpen[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2022 at 23:55:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Book_illustrations_in_black_and_white
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Archibald Standish Hartrick - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No comment. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:10, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:31, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I have just read the summary of the story and it seems this narrative is brutal, chauvinistic, racist and glorifies war crimes, murder and acts of violence. Is it somehow to be understood as a hidden criticism of these crimes, or did Kipling (whom I have only known from the Jungle Book) really represent this terrible attitude? (I know that such attitudes were common in those days, but it is always sad to find out that this or that great writer, artist etc. also shared them, so I ask). --Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • My impression from Kipling is he's basically an advocate for the lower classes, advocating for the enlisted over the officers that ordered them around. He seems to try not to be racist, but doesn't always succeed given when he was writing. He clearly loved the culture and people of India, but he's also the author of The White Man's Burden. But, then again, The White Man's Burden is also a statement of goals, and explicitly states that colonialism's goals should be, first, to benefit the people under it, and, secondly, to eventually release them. Basically, he's arguably progressive for his day, but not tainted by it. That said, having read Puck of Pook's Hill, which has one of the most bizarre defenses of Jewish people you'll ever see. (It basically boils down to something like "Yes, they love money and control the world's finances. But that's a good thing! It's just a little quirk they have, and they always use it to benefit everyone. Aren't they great?") ...Well, I get the feeling he's a great writer, probably has a good heart, but he is not, when it comes down to it, a clever man, and that shows in some of the most bizarre "hot takes" (or whatever you want to call them) in literature. That said, I'm a white guy so take my impressions with a grain of salt. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:27, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      Just as an addendum: Kipling is actually a pretty eloquent spokesperson for conservatism, as a general proposition rather than a set of positions purported to reflect that general proposition, as demonstrated by "The Gods of the Copybook Headings", which I still find very relevant (Rereading it, I really wonder what Kipling would have thought of Brexit). Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Adam and Daniel, thank you very much for your responses and insights! Very interesting. Well, human beings are complex and often have contradictory ideas and attitudes (mostly without realizing that they are contradictory), and so I should not be surprised that this applies also to Kipling. --Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Les Hauts Forts 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2022 at 16:49:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Les Hauts Forts (2466 m) in commune of Morzine, Haute-Savoie, France