Commons:特色靚相候選

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:FPC Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | հայերեն | +/−

呢度係成為特色靚相嘅候選區。請留意呢度唔係同每日靚相一樣

要知道之前有乜提名,睇睇:Commons:等色靚相/紀錄

正式嘅事物[edit]

提名[edit]

如果您認為您已經創作或搵到一張可能有價值的圖片,請將佢加到「提名」部分嘅最頂部。用呢個連結加入。

喺您提名之前,請肯定已經喺相應的圖片加上適當嘅版權標籤

請喺投票嘅時候利用您嘅語言或者使用下面嘅模板

  • 支持 - Support, Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, ...
  • 反對 - Oppose, No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, ...

另外,您亦可以使用模板{{Oppose}}同{{Support}}

您亦可以表達使用{{I love}}代表您喜歡呢張圖片或您想利用{{Neutral}}嚟表達您嘅睇法。

特色靚相候選方針[edit]

  • 14 日投票持間。結果將會喺提名後嘅第 15 日公佈決定。
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅提名
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅討論貢獻
  • 匿名貢獻者嘅投票不作計算
  • 提名者不會計作票數。必須另作解釋作出支持。
  • 記住,Wikimedia Commons 計劃嘅目標係提供一個中央式嘅檔案庫,以提供所有 Wikimedia 計劃(包括未來的計劃)裏使用。呢個唔只係於置 Wikipedia 嘅圖片,因此呢啲圖片唔係只針對嗰個計劃作出決定。

要成功登上特色靚相,必須合乎以下嘅條件。

  • 合理嘅牌照 (當然)
  • 最少 5 張支持票
  • 支持/反對嘅比例最少為 2:1 (三分二多數,即最少 67% 支持)

有關點樣處理舊嘅提名,睇睇Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished

更新呢一頁:purge this page's cache

提名[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Christophorus 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 16:10:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Statue of Saint Christopher

File:Gurung child at Upper Sinuwa during Annapurna Base camp trek in a Tea house-2972.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 13:40:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
@Charlesjsharp: Yes, i can and do have a permission to use this child's portrait. I asked his father about this photo and doesn't have any problem. But is there any template to indicate Parental Permission --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Bijay. There probably is, someone else might help? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks @Charlesjsharp:, Or Is it OK to write in description section that this user have permission to use this photo in Commons--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
The template we have is {{Consent}}. If you use that and write about the father's permission in the description, that's enough. --Cart (talk) 18:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Why did you applied the vignetting and looking at it I have the impression that the use of the 25 mm so close to the head and this being tilted results in a deformation of the head. I don't think that a wide angle lens is usually a good choice por portrait shots Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img62 Ortaköy Mosque.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 13:35:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ortaköy Mosque

File:Theyyam at peeleri vayanaattukulavan kaavu 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 08:41:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Theyyam Make-up
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info--Theyyam (Teyyam, Theyam, Theyyattam) is a popular ritual form of worship in Kerala, India. Theyyam is a living cult with several thousand-year-old traditions, rituals and customs. The performers of Theyyam belong to folk communities. Theyyam is mixture of folk arts like folk painting, folk song, folk dance etc.

-- created by, uploaded by, nominated by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think this is a good photo of cultural heritage. It works well because you can see the intent expression of the man concentrating on his task. There are a few quibbles about image quality but overall this seems like an FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 18:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose The subject is FP-worthy but I'm not convinced by the crop, special at the bottom, the noise/detail level and the cluttered background, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree poco Seven Pandas (talk) 21:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Browning Range during winter sunrise, Lake Kaniere Scenic Reserve, West Coast, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2020 at 01:33:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Browning Range during winter sunrise, Lake Kaniere Scenic Reserve, West Coast, New Zealand

File:Luz Train Station, Sao Paulo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 14:11:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Luz Train Station, Sao Paulo
if I cut the right I run the risk that the cut is too close to the train door, regarding the other photo it is really a art work, thanks. I'm going to try to make another cut to see what you think --Wilfredor (talk) 13:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per W.Carter. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Alt cut[edit]

Luz Train Station, Sao Paulo

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Thanks Cart for your recomendation. I preffer this cut --Wilfredor (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry Wilfredor but I prefer the original cut. The original worked well because the lampposts acted like a framing device, but without them it seems a bit like just a random photo of a train station. Cmao20 (talk) 18:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Ottoman surrender of Jerusalem restored.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 11:56:11
Ottoman surrender of Jerusalem

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The biggest problems are that the crop removes people from the image - which I believe makes much of the description inaccurate - and it turns a semi-transparent flag (expected for thin fabric seen against a bright sky) into a solid flag, which looks really unnatural. I just don't think this is a good example of our work. (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep If you compare to this, only one person was cropped out. I also see no problems with the flag. --Andrei (talk) 12:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per Adam. Buidhe (talk) 21:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist because of the destructive crop. Historical photos should be restored faithfully. Plus, the guy on the left of the original photo looks like an important person. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per others --StellarHalo (talk) 06:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per others. --Cayambe (talk) 07:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist No need to make such strange alterations to an historical photo. Cmao20 (talk) 18:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Isojärvi panorama 3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 11:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Isojärvi, Pomarkku.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Finland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info There are 187,888 lakes, about 509,800 summer cottages, and estimated 3,2 million saunas in Finland. The image depicts a common summer day view over a lake in Finland, in this case the photo is taken from my summer cottage. The lake is called Isojärvi, and it is the 97. largest lake in Finland. The day was beautiful, and the sunset was equally stunning. Created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 11:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support —kallerna (talk) 11:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice reflections and I like the wider crop, but it seems oversharpened to me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cmao20, it's not well processed and a bit tilted. I also find the motif a bit average. --Cart (talk) 10:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Aina-kari near Zarih of Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2020 at 06:13:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

[Āina-kāri] near [Zarih] of [Fatima Masumeh Shrine] , Qom, Iran
@Ikan Kekek: Thanks Mr Kekek. I use fujifilm GFX 50R camera. because of Panorama and HDR techniques, some of my pictures exif data are removed.--Amirpashaei (talk) 09:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
That info should be on the file page, not here. I've added the Template:Photo Information to the page, you can fill in information that way if the exif is lost. I've also fixed the links to wiki-pages in the description for you. --Cart (talk) 11:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Very easy to circumvent this: just c+p the edited picture on the original picture, and save it as its copy. --A.Savin 11:19, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Miss Carter. I wrote the exif data.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Mr Savin. I will try this method.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely image. Although all the reflections does make me somewhat wish for a stereoscopic view. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
@Adam Cuerden: Thanks Mr Cuerden. Stereoscopic view is a main purpose of building Muqarnas . the purpose in the Āina kāri is showing Glamor and glitter.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
I mean as in a 3D view, so that you can tell the shapes of the complex, reflective structures. Obviously, that's not happening. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
I understood. If we have light and shadow in a picture we have 3D view too. but in Āina kāri art you just see light's reflection and there is no shadow. because that reason you don't see the shape not even in reality and with your eyes.--Amirpashaei (talk) 13:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another good one. Seems like a tremendously unusual place with all that green. Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Absolutamente si --Wilfredor (talk) 17:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 22:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 05:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Although I think the top half could have a little, little bit more contrast for better impact. -- Cart (talk) 10:14, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
I didn't want to go far from original picture. but I agree with you in more contrast Miss Carter.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I kind of would like to see more at the bottom (cropped chandalier) but anyhow, great Poco a poco (talk) 18:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Mr Silva. I will shot from floor to the ceiling and from top to floor next time.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Maroc Marrakech Jemaa-el-Fna Luc Viatour.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 23:19:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Maroc Marrakech Jemaa-el-Fna Luc Viatour.JPG

Jemaa el-Fnaa is a square and market place in Marrakesh's medina quarter (old city). It remains the main square of Marrakesh, used by locals and tourists.

  • Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the gallery here>]]
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Lviatour - uploaded by Lviatour - nominated by Editor-1
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Editor-1 (talk) 23:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A snapshot with lots of posterization, and please add the correct gallery. Find it by looking at COM:FP, but somewhere in it will be "Pictures" and "#Morocco". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unbalanced composition with a bright, empty sky taking up too much space. -- King of ♥ 03:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
We can crop the sky easily by using CropTool--Editor-1 (talk) 03:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty but doesn't add up to more than a snapshot to me with the obvious tilt, blown-out featureless sky, and blurry ledge in the bottom left corner. Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

File:2017-02-02 APRIL MORAN - IMO 9373711.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 18:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info: With antenna lowered for bridges, sea-going tugboat April Moran, heads down the Elizabeth River at dusk off Norfolk, Virginia, USA. - created - uploaded - nominated by GRDN711 (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- GRDN711 (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The light in this pic is really beautiful, but I can't help feeling the focus has been missed, it doesn't seem quite sharp. But I don't want to oppose such a lovely scene. Cmao20 (talk) 15:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice light and mood, but unfortunately not sharp enough and though the lowered navigation light mast (not an antenna) has some educational value, it spoils the contour of the boat a bit. Better to catch it on the other side of the bridge. --Cart (talk) 10:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per W.Carter. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Chichester Cathedral Choir, West Sussex, UK - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 18:29:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chichester Cathedral choir
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United Kingdom
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Chichester Cathedral is one of the 26 medieval cathedrals of England. Although it isn't the largest, its architecture is seen by critics as one of the finest examples of the period; it also has the distinction of being the only medieval English cathedral visible from the sea. There are currently no FPs from this cathedral, but Diliff has several shots on Commons, and this shot of the choir seems the best of the series. created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow. Unfortunately not completely symmetrical, but I think it's the corridor's problem rather than the photographer's. -- King of ♥ 18:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Yes, most English cathedrals are not perfectly symmetrical. See Ripon Cathedral for an example that just gets odder the more you look at it. Cmao20 (talk) 18:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nothing is perfectly synmetrical --Wilfredor (talk) 20:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing that there are still not-yet-nominated FPs from David after all these years. I hope he and his family are doing well, and that he comes back some time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Of course. Has he really been gone that long? It feels like he was here last year still. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great photo. Buidhe (talk) 22:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --StellarHalo (talk) 10:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Andrei (talk) 14:14, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Landscape of Luang Prabang with a temporary wooden footbridge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 18:25:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Landscape of Luang Prabang (Laos)

File:Wroclaw- Ratusz, wieza.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 16:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wrocław Town Hall Tower
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Poland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support The nice clock on the tower is interesting enough to feature, though I must say I wish it didn't have such a boring building behind it. Cmao20 (talk) 17:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting info.svg Info Constructed in 1931, the Municipal Savings Bank is an iconic example of the German Modernist architecture. Designed by Henrich Rump, the winning project was in line with the modernist style and innovative urban design of Max Berg, creator of the Centennial Hall (UNESCO site). Located in the middle of the Old Town Square, next to Baroque and Renaissance houses, it symbolizes not only power of Silesian economy, but the futuristic vision and ambitions of the city. --Andrei (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Fair enough. I'm sure it's an important building, but the architecture really doesn't appeal to me. I'm not a fan of modernism overall to be honest. The picture is still good though. Cmao20 (talk) 18:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Anas platyrhynchos - Weiherwald - Karlsruhe 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 11:12:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Anas platyrhynchos Linnaeus, 1758 (Mallard) swimming in Lemna minor (Common Duckweed); Weiherwald, Karlsruhe,
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Family_:_Anatidae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 11:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Composition and image quality look fine to me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A duck ducking down in duckweed. Cute. Daniel Case (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The area between and peak looks awkward, probably it was darker and has been lighten up a bit, the result doesn't look realistic. Quality otherwise is good and the green layer nice but at the end of the day a duck in a center of an image, no dynamic there, sorry. --Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Dörzbach - Hohebach - Jüdischer Friedhof - Detailansicht 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 07:12:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jewish gravestones in Hohenlohekreis
  • You're right, but is there any reason they have to be? IMO there's nothing wrong with a picture focussing only on the ones nearest the camera. Aristeas has gone for a similar approach in this FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
    • I would say that it adds depth to the photo --Andrei (talk) 18:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Hazel MacKaye and dog by Harris & Ewing.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 06:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hazel MacKaye

File:2019W3046 - Львів.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2020 at 06:15:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

alley in Stryjskyj Park, Lviv, Ukraine
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Myroslav Vydrak - uploaded by Myroslav Vydrak - nominated by Мирослав Видрак -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 06:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Myroslav Vydrak (talk) 06:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I can see that it must have been very pleasant to be there in that weather, but I don't see what I consider an unusually great composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A very beautiful photograph with nice colours but a) it needs a perspective correction and b) I too am not quite sold on the composition - the path takes up too much of the frame for me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Lack of sharpness: there is a small sharp focal plane and it seems quite arbitrary, as a result it seems that almost nothing is in focus. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This image has the elements of a lot of great autumn photos, but without actually being one. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Boletus erythropus 2010 G1.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 21:31:19
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Too cluttered, blurry grass blade in front of the stump, crop unnecessarily wide, distracting branches, dim lighting, average composition (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist It has encyclopedic value but I have seen much better fungus images fail to get promoted to FP. Also, the natural phenomenon depicted could be reproduced in a lab/artificial setting and so a studio shot is very much possible. -- StellarHalo (talk) 21:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist I agree - the level of detail here does not seem like FP quality. --Peulle (talk) 22:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Low wow and sadly well below FP quality in 2020. Cmao20 (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist per others. -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- King of ♥ 04:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist +1 --El Grafo (talk) 14:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist , does not seem special. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist --Cayambe (talk) 07:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Clouds reflected in a bay with jellyfish infestation at Rågårdsdal.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 21:10:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Clouds reflected in a bay with jellyfish infestation at Rågårdsdal
Clouds reflected in a bay with jellyfish infestation in Åbyfjorden at Rågårdsdal, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. Most of the jellies are moon jellyfish (Aurelia aurita) and lion's mane jellyfish (Cyanea capillata). When these gatherings occur, the lion's manes go into a bit of a feeding frenzy capturing and eating moon jellies. The bigger lion's manes will capture smaller moon jellies with their tentacles and drag them up into their mouths. Smaller lion's manes will attach themselves to a moon jelly and eat. They seem to prefer eating the moon jellies from the underside. Some of the moon jellies in this photo are tattered and flaccid after having been partially eaten by lion's manes, others have circular marks from the lion's manes feeding. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cart (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much noise for me, and I find the reflections more disturbing than adding to the picture.--Peulle (talk) 22:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the shadow spoils everything. JukoFF (talk) 22:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good abstract work. I think it succeeds mainly because of its sheer uniqueness, I have never seen anything quite like it. Cmao20 (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Disturbing reflections and the composition doesn't work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile, but if you crop out most of the cloud reflections, it might work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao—absolutely unique Buidhe (talk) 01:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support more for the jellyfishes. Nice shot! - Benh (talk) 06:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan. I might support without the cloud reflections. Sorry. --StellarHalo (talk) 08:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another Cocteau Twins cover-style Cart image ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Works for me.--iMahesh (talk) 15:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 20:04:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Lemuridae (Lemurs)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This lemur is on the front cover of Issue Four of my free magazine (read online) or download pdf. This month I have amazing photos from Llez, Archaeodontosaurus, Cayambe, Rhododendrites, Wilfredor and Jkadavoor. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I can't resist lemurs since they, apparently, can't resist me. I visited a park with lemurs once and we were told to strictly not touch the lemurs. No one had told the lemurs the same. I was the tallest in the group and the lemurs took turns jumping down and perching on my head. Spent most of that visit with a "lemur hat". ;-) --Cart (talk) 21:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I always appreciate for wildlife images but this one is not at the level of others. Main issues here are the leaf in front of the face, the tilt (see the water level) and the noise level --Poco a poco (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose a good shot no more. JukoFF (talk) 22:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Resolution is not your highest but overall this still makes it to FP. Obviously this is an endangered species and I am happier to make allowances because of that. The quality is good overall despite a bit of noise and the angle and composition are really good, showing the whole animal very well. Definitely one of the best shots of the species on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 22:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support FP for me. Nice composition, facial expression and shape of its tail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too noisy and too low resolution. The grass spoils a bit. Looking at the first version, the quality had no real FP potential (although the reprocess is better). Light very average -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 00:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Benh (talk) 06:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco.--Ermell (talk) 07:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile. --Ivar (talk) 10:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I appreciate the current processing, and the image is overall eye-catching. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I can't help but like it after Cart's story. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Mossy leaf-tailed gecko (Uroplatus sikorae)[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 20:12:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Gekkonidae (Geckos)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The mossy leaf-tailed gecko has developed an amazing camouflage system. It has irregular flaps of skin (known as a dermal flap) that run along its body so that it can press itself against a tree branch or trunk and disappear. The flaps mean that it doesn’t throw a shadow. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is really fascinating. -- B2Belgium (talk) 20:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I really thought for a minute that you nominated a branch without a gecko and another branch with a gecko until I read the description and saw it. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support These has to be in a set! --Cart (talk) 21:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment wow, can you still do something about the frame overlapping issue on the far left of the hiding image? Poco a poco (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For now, at least I deserve an answer why editing the left part of the left picture wouldn't be posible. The quality issues are very obvious and although this set is among the best I can think of, the quality of the left image can and should be improved Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment. Sorry Poco a poco, I didn't notice your comments which are spot on. New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent set, just the way to do photos of camouflaged animals. Cmao20 (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others. So cool! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Gorgeous illustration of camouflage in nature. Each image is fine as FP, but the set increases the value of the pair. Imagine only one picture captured in this place, we would love to see the other one. The fact we've got both clearly adds an extra documenting value. The animal itself seems rare enough and visually special to boost the candidature. Still two remarks: 1) Do you know the template {{otherversion|File:example.jpg}} you can add in the description pages? 2) Very poor categorization. I would expect at least something related to the notion of camouflage, which seems essential here -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done thanks, though the template doesn’t seem to work very well. I edited Camouflage on Wikipedia, but the edit was reverted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • It works well IMO but is supposed to be placed in the specified section Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed. And I've learnt something with your category added -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support One of the best animal camouflage images I have seen on here --StellarHalo (talk) 00:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Buidhe (talk) 01:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 04:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wooowowowowowowwww - Benh (talk) 06:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I am groot - Benh (talk) 06:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support/ Almost ideal for set nominating. Left part of Hiding a bit unsharp. --KSK (talk) 07:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A shame that the left part of the hiding is not perfect but a lot of wow. Never seen the animal before.--Ermell (talk) 07:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 09:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 10:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Absolutely cool! --Basotxerri (talk) 16:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent set! --GRDN711 (talk) 17:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question How are sets handled by POTY? It would be really sad this doesn't make it to POTY candidates. - Benh (talk) 17:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Benh, sets do count for POTY, but we vote on the set as a whole rather than the pictures individually. Example here - see the '1/8' above the picture and the navigation tools to scroll through the pictures in the set. Cmao20 (talk) 18:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Sets do count in POTY, but if, I remember correctly, are poorly displayed for voting - I think only one image is displayed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • One image at a time is displayed. It's not obvious at all it is a set. I hope this doesn't compromise this set's chances. - Benh (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • As well as notifying this page that POTY has started, the organizers could improve the layout to alert voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Crucibulum laeve - Vieux-Sautour2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 10:36:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common bird's nest fungus

File:Wooden bench swing and wicker hammocks on a bamboo footbridge in paddy fields a sunny day during the monsoon, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 09:24:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wooden bench swing and wicker hammocks on a bamboo footbridge in paddy fields a sunny day during the monsoon, Vang Vieng, Laos

File:A large cabbage.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 09:15:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Historisches Hammerwerk am Blautopf-Abfluss.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 08:57:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by GZagatta - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a nice enough scene but to me, somehow the "zooming effect" that the lens makes here is at odds with this very peaceful and tranquil landscape. That effect is better in more action-y photos. --Cart (talk) 09:40, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pretty enough for FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 04:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition does not work for me, the main object (the building) is at the side and cropped. Furthermore, there are some CAs and perspective issues. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose While I have no issues with the composition, it perhaps does aggravate the unsharpness that's too prevalent in the image. Daniel Case (talk) 00:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Quality is not the best and per Uoaei1, 15 mm definitely work here, but the image format doesn't Poco a poco (talk) 18:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Wetland - Weiherwald - Karlsruhe 11.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 08:12:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wetland in the Weiherwald, Weiherfeld, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A composition of white, blue, and green; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 08:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice, but please mention the Lemna in the description and categories. When there is this much of it in the photo, it should be in the info as well. A {{Panorama}} template with info would hurt either. --Cart (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thanks --Llez (talk) 11:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 21:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, very weak composition. JukoFF (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very high quality, but not a compelling composition for me as most of the center is blank. -- King of ♥ 04:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is not blank, it is completely filled with Lemna minor (common duckweed), please zoom in to see the details, especially in the foreground --Llez (talk) 10:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
      • When I talk about composition, I mean from a global perspective it is blank - it doesn't lead my eye anywhere, while the interesting bits are all on the periphery. -- King of ♥ 15:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per other --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:45, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with KoH Poco a poco (talk) 18:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker -- 2020 -- 8874 (bw).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 04:45:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gate of bunker 24 in the ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Thank you. I just cloned out the tiny area. --XRay talk 04:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Longsheng Rice Terraces November 2017 014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2020 at 04:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Longsheng Rice Terraces after harvest

File:Murión (Gymnothorax unicolor), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 49.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 19:51:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brown moray eel (Gymnothorax unicolor) found in Madeira, Portugal.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Muraenidae_(Moray_Eels)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Brown moray eel (Gymnothorax unicolor) found in Madeira, Portugal. I'm giving it another try. Morays are rare, they are usually hiding in holes and active during the night. I cross my fingers to hope that the composition here is acceptable. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Now this is more like what I want in a photo of a moray eel. Lurking in a crevasse ready to spring on an unsuspecting prey. The "sinister grin" is a nice bonus. --Cart (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support That looks good - Benh (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 22:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others. Sharp head, good facial expression as Cart says. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree with the above, this is a much better shot and I wouldn't have supported the other one if I had noticed you'd done this one too. Cmao20 (talk) 00:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. This is much better than the previous one. --StellarHalo (talk) 08:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 10:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Pez lagarto diamante (Synodus synodus), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 44.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 19:47:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Diamond lizardfish (Synodus synodus) found in Madeira, Portugal.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Aulopiformes_(Grinners)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Diamond lizardfish (Synodus synodus) found in Madeira, Portugal. This species has typically a length of 20 centimetres (7.9 in) and lives in the Atlantic Ocean, usually between 2 metres (6.6 ft) and 35 metres (115 ft) deep, in this case found at the bottom of a reef area 12 metres (39 ft) deep. There are no FPs of this family (and I just uploaded the first 2 QIs). c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. DoF is shallow but still great considering technical challenges and in some ways I think it actually helps the photo to have only the head in focus. Cmao20 (talk) 00:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose merging background. JukoFF (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
    JukoFF: what do you mean with "merging background"? too bussy? what kind of background do you expect then here? Poco a poco (talk) 06:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice face, natural background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Pergola - Point Pelee National Park.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 18:57:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pergola - Point Pelee National Park
Thank you, the shadows are the main point here, I'm glad you noticed :-) --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A special kind of mirroring --Llez (talk) 08:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Doesn't work for me with this vanishing point targeting an uninteresting guardrail -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If I may. The point of the image is the uniform lattice of the shadows. A small crop, top and bottom would give the photo a better impact. If you don't see exactly where the lattice begins, you get that infinity feeling. The bench will be cut, but that is secondary in this image IMO. See note. --Cart (talk) 09:19, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done: cropped. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Yay! :-) Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose bad geometry. JukoFF (talk) 22:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
If one is really into Lobachevskian geometry, perhaps. Can't see what's wrong with it otherwise... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
The center square is ideal, but the top rungs are not parallel). But this is not the point, the point is that there is no enceclopedicity, what should this image illustrate on Wikipedia *? JukoFF (talk) 02:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
You keep giving this reason for opposing things here and at QIC, and I wish you'd stop. First of all, you have no idea what might be used on Wikipedia, but second, this is not Wikipedia and this is not FPC on any of the Wikipedias. You think that Commons is only about encyclopedic illustrations, not about photography in any other way? Where in the world do you get that idea from? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I see what you were thinking but I think the image is trying to do too much. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this, and I don't find it a particularly complicated form, but I do find it satisfying. And for JukoFF, I could easily see this being used on Wikipedia as a good example of light and shadow in photography, but more importantly, I could see it being used on another page on photography, -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel Poco a poco (talk) 19:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bereich der US Army -- 2020 -- 8893.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 13:59:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Manhole cover at special ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 13:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 13:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, it's a great new take on the old manhole theme, and I would gladly have supported if the flowers were not fused into yellow and white blobs. I think that could have been avoided. Do you think you could try a new shot? Perhaps a two shot stack of some kind. --Cart (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • No, sorry. I can't take another shot. The area is closed. Perhaps my next visit is end of September or in spring. May there are other flowers. I'll have a look. --XRay talk 16:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately overexposed. -- King of ♥ 22:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Definitely a good compositional idea, but Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cart. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I like the idea very much and the quality is fine for me, seems sharp and I don't think the issue with the flowers is very important. My support is only weak because I don't think the subject itself is outstanding. I've seen manhole covers that are much more ornate and beautiful than this (here are a few beautiful ones on an external site) and as good as this shot is, the subject lacks the craftsmanship and elegance of some examples I've seen, so it doesn't really fill me with amazement. Cmao20 (talk) 00:26, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per others --Llez (talk) 08:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others JukoFF (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cart --StellarHalo (talk) 00:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 01:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Works for me.--iMahesh (talk) 17:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me too, a funny shot, for a change Poco a poco (talk) 19:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Vieux Limoilou, Québec city, Canadá 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2020 at 03:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Apis mellifera carrying pollen in a pollen basket, Vieux Limoilou, Québec city, Canadá

File:Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 21:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of an interance of Atabki Sahn in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran
  • That may improve the attractiveness, yes -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 02:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit underexposed --Wilfredor (talk) 03:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support WOW again. --Gnosis (talk) 06:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The light is better than the ones with more visible reflections. Buidhe (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 13:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as usual. --Aristeas (talk) 14:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment How many pictures of this kind have already been nominated and awarded? I think it's getting enough. -Killarnee (CTU) 15:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • @Killarnee: , @W.carter: I can earn money by selling these picture's copy right. but to be seen by all, I abandon the copy right by uploading them in Wikimedia. I think these works are Masterpieces of Persian architectural art and rarely seen before. I agree with Miss Carter but I think we should consider these pictures Regardless of religion. these pictures reflect pure art and history of ancient world Whether Christian or Muslim. --Amirpashaei (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Of course it's all art and architecture. We just have a rather crude way of sorting photos here on Commons since our tagging system is antiquated. I sincerely thank you for donating these photos to WikiMedia, however there are always voters who get bored if there are a lot of similar photos nominated one after the other, whatever the subject. It's a very picky and tough audience. Perhaps if you had some other views or artwork you could alternate with, then you wouldn't risk what we call "reviewer-fatigue". Most experienced nominators try to mix up their noms to keep the audience alert, since it increases the chances of noms getting featured. FPC is always craving new fresh things. --Cart (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks Miss Carter. I consider it. Although I seen voters wondering of my new pictures and that's raised me to nominate them.--Amirpashaei (talk) 17:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
So I've seen several such mosaic pictures in the last few days and think it's enough, which is why I don't give a pro. And what do you want to tell me "you could also sell the pictures"? Should it be blackmail or should I fall at your feet now? -Killarnee (CTU) 18:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Showing the architectural masterpieces to the world is my proud and honor. that's caused donating them. it's not blackmailing. you can oppose with my nominations. but I don't understand why you think other voters shouldn't support. --Amirpashaei (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
I don't give a pro because I just think that there are enough pictures of this kind, even if they are well done. At the end of the year, every second picture at POTY is a mosaic picture. -Killarnee (CTU) 19:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
every of these pictures are unique and designing them took many years. these art works not simple mosaic, they are unique. even now making these masterpieces are very hard and rarely can find architecture could design them. I think you don't know this art well. good luck.--Amirpashaei (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I recognize the art and I know what kind of masterpieces they are, but I would like it if you would nominate landscapes for example. -Killarnee (CTU) 19:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It seems like most of us are not bored - these ceilings are all really beautiful and different from one another, and we've seen way more pictures of churches than of mosques - but I'd surely love to see other types of photos of beautiful or interesting motifs in Iran, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
I agree with Ikan Kekek. Amirpashaei, we have absolutely loads of featured pictures of church interiors and it shouldn't stop us featuring any more as long as we can still find pictures of outstanding quality and extraordinary subjects. The exact same is true with your pictures. In fact we are quite underrepresented with mosques (and even more so with synagogues, Hindu/Sikh temples etc.) compared with churches, so as far as I'm concerned I'm happy to vote support for almost any of these pictures you present us with. Cmao20 (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
@W.carter: , @Ikan Kekek: , @Cmao20: Thanks for your support and high understanding of art. My purpose of nominating these pictures is to be seen better and using in more pages. --Amirpashaei (talk) 07:09, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
You say "seen better and using in more pages", but this image is not used as far as I can see Amirpashaei. So why not? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
I meant relevant pages. on of the my purposes is saving these monuments in image form. because most of heritage in Iran don't maintain very well.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Charles, I'm not surprised by that. The photo is recently uploaded and the author is foremost a photographer donating his photos to us and not a very active Wikipedian. Not every uploader will immediately go about spreading their photos on as many articles as possible. Also remember that Commons photos are used by many, many other sites outside the Wiki-verse, those uses don't show up on the Commons file page. I often find my photos online in the most unlikely places, but it always takes a while for a photo to get spread. By uploading photos here we make them available for people and that is enough. --Cart (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Miss Carter. Exactly. I agree.--Amirpashaei (talk) 12:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I find it a bit boring to see so many similar candidates (and ceilings are a bit of a super cooperative easy subjects), but they are all incredible shots in my view. - Benh (talk) 20:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not bored. :) On the contrary, I find these pictures absolutely stunning. –– B2Belgium (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:50, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing. JukoFF (talk) 22:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Cephalanthus occidentalis occidentalis1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 20:27:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cephalanthus occidentalis
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Rubiaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info: Common buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis occidentalis); all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Could be sharper, but I don't care. The compo and light of these corona-like plant balls is gorgeous. --Cart (talk) 20:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --StellarHalo (talk) 22:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I might add a bit more sharpening but this is a nice shot and a good unusual subject. Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support One of the better-composed plant photos I've seen. -- King of ♥ 02:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I never knew that the Coronavirus could grow so big. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I also think the composition is what sets this one appart - Benh (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I wonder how long it will be before people start calling this a "virus tree" Face-smile.svg. Daniel Case (talk) 16:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2020 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Rhacophorus kio.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 17:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rhacophorus kio

File:Gebänderte Prachtlibelle auf Pusteblume am NSG Gülper See.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 17:03:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Calopteryx splendens

File:Filhote de Jacaré.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 15:27:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Filhote de jacaré no entardecer do Porto Jofre, Pantanal.


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Gsengscharte 20200622.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2020 at 10:18:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hiking path to Gsengscharte, Nationalpark Gesäuse, Austria
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Styria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This picture does not have an immediate "wow" for me, but looking at it closer, one first notices the natural side with the rocks, and only later how there are nine (!) way markings leading the hiker and the eye to the top. --Domob (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Domob (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, I see what you're going for. Maybe a little low on the wow but overall I think it's unusual and interesting enough to feature. Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting and unusual. Buidhe (talk) 23:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sufficiently intesting to me I'm afraid. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not really outstanding --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 01:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support An example for redundance --Llez (talk) 06:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. JukoFF (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Vaste Judaspenning (Lunaria rediviva) 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 17:37:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Сурок черношапочный (камчатский).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 10:20:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by NadezhdaKhaustova - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 10:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KSK (talk) 10:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This picture was nominated as part of a set- nomination "Black-capped marmots" and received 6 support before I withdrew this nomination due to Charlesjsharp remarks. --KSK (talk) 10:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's a nice composition of an adult with a juvenile, but not sharp enough for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 15:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good picture, but not sharp enough. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per my vote on the original nomination. Wrt sharpness, I don't think it's a focus issue, it's just perhaps a bit too little sharpness has been applied to it in processing. But that is easily fixed, and I'd rather an undersharpened JPEG than an oversharpened one. Cmao20 (talk) 22:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per my remark on the set. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --StellarHalo (talk) 02:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good picture, but.... JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The quality is not the best for the exemplar in the back (given that the first one is on focus) but hey, it's a 600 mm shot and the compo is one of the best we have in that FP category Poco a poco (talk) 19:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Ferdinand Hodler - Der Genfersee von Chexbres aus.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 05:43:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lake Geneva as seen from Chexbres

File:Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 045.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2020 at 00:22:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Walk to the Moon

talk) 09:06, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Per Poco. It is a nice scene, but is missing something extra to make it "wow" for me. --Domob (talk) 10:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Very good but not IMO an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose little wow - Benh (talk) 16:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. JukoFF (talk) 23:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Nieuw blad van een beuk (Fagus sylvatica). 26-04-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2020 at 05:27:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae New beech leaf.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Fresh new leaf of a beech (Fagus sylvatica) in mild morning light.The mild morning light creates a pleasant atmosphere in my opinion.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose A QI, yes, but it doesn't stand out enough for me to consider it an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The light is what makes the difference here. Cmao20 (talk) 16:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose it's nice, but per Daniel. --Ivar (talk) 19:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose DoF is too shallow for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Poco a poco (talk) 14:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan Kekek. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me it is special because it captures the delicacy of the young leaves, thanks to the tender light and to the shallow DoF. --Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Annapurna Massif-IMG 5221-Pano.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2020 at 17:44:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
✓ Done Thank you @Uoaei1: for review. Location added --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 16:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:29, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg weak oppose I'm going to dissent. It's nice, but not exceptional panorama with a midday light and a bland composition - Benh (talk) 10:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 13:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't think Benh's oppose is unreasonable, but I find enough to enjoy looking at the panorama in high resolution, even if the composition could maybe be a bit more interesting. Cmao20 (talk) 16:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • 71 Mpx crispy sharp image: very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg weak oppose per Benh. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg weak oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 14:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per others --StellarHalo (talk) 02:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Benh's oppose is reasonable, but also is a nice panorama. --Gnosis (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lack of detail. --Ivar (talk) 15:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment look at grass, it's unnatural. --Ivar (talk) 06:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Conical shadow of Mount Nam Xay over green trees at golden hour, South-West view from the top, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2020 at 01:00:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Conical shadow of Mount Nam Xay over green trees at golden hour, South-West view from the top, Vang Vieng, Laos
  • The resemblance is actually pretty uncanny! Cmao20 (talk) 16:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Adam's Peak being in the water, it allows the sun's rays to reach it really very early. But similar idea :-) Basile Morin (talk) 22:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:40, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ordinarily I'd find the shadow distracting but it's so perfect here. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
★⭑⭑⭑⭑ 🌄 ⭑⭑⭑⭑★ :-) Basile Morin (talk) 13:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:07, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose quite nice and interesting idea, but the (light on the) background is a bit too distracting to make this photo very "special", in summary the half top is not very very nice. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Christian here Poco a poco (talk) 14:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Christian Ferrer. --Fischer.H (talk) 07:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In my opinion the light on the background is fine, but the shadow at the right on the mountains can be competitive. It comes from another peak behind. However, the shadow on the trees (left and right) accentuates the impression of light centered in the middle -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Conical shadow of Mount Nam Xay over green trees at golden hour, South-West view from the top, Vang Vieng, Laos

File:Tiefenstürmig Feuersalamander -20200314-RM-171544.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2020 at 20:32:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fire salamander in a stream in the Franconian Switzerland that dries up in summer.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Family : Salamandridae (True Salamanders)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Fire salamander in a stream in the Franconian Switzerland that dries up in summer. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A QI deservedly, but this just doesn't do it for me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question how could u get a salamander to remain still for a close up stack like this? - Benh (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info @Benh: @Cmao20: I stood with the tripod in shallow water and the camera was mounted upside down to be close enough above the water surface. The animal moves about as slowly as a toad and always pauses for a moment. Of course you need a little bit of luck.--Ermell (talk) 08:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
      • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks. It's an amazing shot. - Benh (talk) 18:28, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm impressed. Look at the animal's head, in particular. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Really excellent for me. Beautiful creature and it's extraordinary that you have managed to get a focus stack with everything so sharp. I have no idea how you even began to achieve that. Cmao20 (talk) 15:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan and Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great colors, shoot, focus and lovely animal --Wilfredor (talk) 02:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 12:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)