Commons:特色靚相候選

呢度係成為特色靚相嘅候選區。請留意呢度唔係同每日靚相一樣。

要知道之前有乜提名，睇睇：Commons:等色靚相/紀錄

正式嘅事物

提名

如果您認為您已經創作或搵到一張可能有價值的圖片，請將佢加到「提名」部分嘅最頂部。用呢個連結加入。

喺您提名之前，請肯定已經喺相應的圖片加上適當嘅版權標籤。

請喺投票嘅時候利用您嘅語言或者使用下面嘅模板：

支持 - Support, Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, ...
反對 - Oppose, No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, ...

另外，您亦可以使用模板{{Oppose}}同{{Support}}

您亦可以表達使用{{I love}}代表您喜歡呢張圖片或您想利用{{Neutral}}嚟表達您嘅睇法。

特色靚相候選方針

14 日投票持間。結果將會喺提名後嘅第 15 日公佈決定。
歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅提名
歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅討論貢獻
匿名貢獻者嘅投票不作計算
提名者不會計作票數。必須另作解釋作出支持。
記住，Wikimedia Commons 計劃嘅目標係提供一個中央式嘅檔案庫，以提供所有 Wikimedia 計劃(包括未來的計劃)裏使用。呢個唔只係於置 Wikipedia 嘅圖片，因此呢啲圖片唔係只針對嗰個計劃作出決定。

要成功登上特色靚相，必須合乎以下嘅條件。

合理嘅牌照 (當然)
最少 5 張支持票
支持／反對嘅比例最少為 2:1 (三分二多數，即最少 67% 支持)

有關點樣處理舊嘅提名，睇睇Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished。

更新呢一頁：purge this page's cache

提名

⚠️ Important notice ⚠️

A vote is currently underway to decide whether the FPC promotion rules should be changed by requiring more than seven votes for an image to be promoted and/or by increasing the required support ratio above 2:1. The number of votes to apply the fifth day rule is also under discussion.

All users eligible to vote on FPC are invited to vote on this page.

The voting is open until 17 March 2026 23:59:59 (UTC).

This temporary notice will be removed after the vote is over.

Shortcut

COM:FPC/CL

Featured picture candidates

File:Fiat 500 yellow.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 18:58:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info A yellow Fiat Nuova 500 on a street in San Marino. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- DILIN (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DILIN (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wheel engraved in the 13th century built Konark Sun Temple in Orissa, India.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 05:37:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info created and uploaded by Joydeep – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
An aside: the motif is quite famous in India because it appears on Indian currency notes. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:41, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anonymous - Krishna and the Gopis Take Shelter from the Rain - 1991.94 - Metropolitan Museum of Art.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 02:07:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Hinduism
Info created by anonymous painter c. 1760 – photographed at the Met, uploaded by BotMultichillT – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:07, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Typical Rajput miniature of Radha Krishna, from eighteenth century, good quality reproduction. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:07, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Запуштено одморалиште кај Николиќ 9.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 00:03:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting, but some chromatic aberration, maybe the author can be stirred out of inactivity to provide the RAW? JayCubby (talk) 01:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done Chromatic aberration removed. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment An alternative version from the same photo session is this one from a slightly different perspective. Please advise if you find it more appealing. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:21, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiedehopf mit Puppe als Futter.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 23:54:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Upupidae_(Hoopoes)
Info created & uploaded by Sven Damerow – nominated by Alu -- Alu (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alu (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good catch by the photographer and the bird, which is pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

* Support 10:59, 6 March 2026 (UTC) Signature missing --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:39, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support A wonderful picture, both the subject and the background. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:38, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolute --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:39, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:57, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great pose. – Aristeas (talk) 18:54, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:BB61 USS Iowa BB61 broadside USN.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 21:16:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/1900s#1980-1989
Info I just cannot believe that this beautiful and powerful photo wasn't yet FP nor VI, guys... (I tought it was in the past, really strange... maybe just on local wikipedia projects; I just stumbled on it after some year and immediately nominated it now)/// created by the DoD-USAF – uploaded by Makthorpe & TomStar81 (current high res.) – nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yeah, this is a striking sight, and before anyone says it's not that sharp, is it sharp enough to you for a 1984 photo of such a sight? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:44, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This used to be my profile picture in school! Fascinating photograph with the conflict of colors and texture. GGOTCC (talk) 07:49, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue Stone (4 March 2026).jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 17:20:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info Pedra Azul (Portuguese for "Blue Stone"), in the Pedra Azul State Park, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The cloudy sky is not a problem here, in my opinion. -- ★ 17:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and a remarkable geological formation. I agree that the cloudy sky isn’t a problem here. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It is one of the most iconic landmarks in the Brazilian state of Espírito Santo. ★ 19:43, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I hope to visit it one day. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Rather soft at 1:1 zoom. The hill shape reminds me of Syntaxys's File:2009-08-27 D100-08 Achim-Lammerts Estergebirge-Krottenkopf.jpg. JayCubby (talk) 20:58, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The main difference: the Syntaxys's image compositionally centers on the gap of the Krottenkopf; here we have a centered crop of another peak itself. ★ 22:57, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I see a sine wave in both. JayCubby (talk) 23:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The crest and trough! Lol ★ 00:42, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gamla brandstationen Vaxholm January 2026 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 12:15:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info Former firestation in Vaxholm after heavy snowfall with the old bell tower and water tower in the background. I am very happy with the composition here, with the three red towers and the contrast with the white snow. Created, uploaded and nominated by-- ArildV (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:13, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:29, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Picturesque and well-composed. – Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foggy Reflections - Loch Tummel.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 07:15:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United Kingdom
Info Autumn landscape at Loch Tummel, Perth and Kinross, Scotland. Created by Eric Kilby – uploaded/nominated by me. Юрий Д.К. 07:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 07:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice reflection, beautiful colors. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's just so appealing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I miss the necessary sharpness --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:NB-36H with B-50, 1955 - DF-SC-83-09332.jpeg

Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 02:03:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft
Info What if... the nuclear wessels were in the air? That's what the US Air Force attempted to explore in the 1950s with the Convair NB-36H, which carried a nuclear reactor to test its shielding and show the feasibility of a nuclear-powered bomber. Ultimately, after fifteen years, they never got around to actually powering an aircraft with a nuclear reactor, and John F. Kennedy killed the program. Created by the United States Air Force – uploaded and nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historical importance, cannot be taken again. Yann (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also a good photo with an excellent composition and well denoised. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC03675 voestalpine Wordmark and Blast Furnace, voestalpine Donawitz, 2026-02.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2026 at 23:47:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Austria
Info Company logo and blast furnace of the Austrian steel producer voestalpine in Leoben, Austria after snowfall. Image by me. --Aciarium (talk) 23:47, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Aciarium (talk) 23:47, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perfect for an advertising purpose ("One step ahead"), but the visual impact of the image is limited in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see the logic with your use of the wall in the composition, and as per Basile, great display of the logo and what the company does. But it takes away from the more interesting infrastructure. JayCubby (talk) 20:09, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Houses in Sanaa, Yemen (10205293626) (edited).jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2026 at 23:24:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Yemen
Info Houses in Sana'a, Yemen. Created by Rod Waddington – firstly uploaded by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) – edited and nominated by ★ -- ★ 23:24, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great documentation since the city is a war zone now. -- ★ 23:24, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems to have a purple tinge. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:04, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Not entirely; just the window courtains. ★ 02:37, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morgenstimmung-Drenthe-Feld-Weiter-Blick-Baumreihe-Krepuskularstrahlen-2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2026 at 21:11:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A moody morning in Drenthe near Aalden. Visible are crepuscular rays . Wide angle view with grass in the foreground sun behind a raw of trees.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Natural_phenomena#Crepuscular_rays
Info A moody morning in Drenthe near Aalden. Visible are crepuscular rays . Wide angle view with grass in the foreground sun behind a raw of trees.
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:13, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:15, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Obere-Halle-Villa-Hügel-2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2026 at 20:51:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:51, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:51, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
SupportThe shadows could be raised a little more. --Ermell (talk) 09:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support but could be a bit brighter --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:57, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
~~Conditional~~ support as per above. JayCubby (talk) 14:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fix, it looks less gloomy now. JayCubby (talk) 22:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the reviews up to now. I have brightened up the shadows a bit. Keep in mind that the wooden interior has also a very dark brown color in reality. Nonetheless a slight brightning was a good idea here, thanks for thind. Please take another look, Chris Woodrich, Ermell, Uoaei1, JayCubby --Tuxyso (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:33, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prague September 2016-17a.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2026 at 16:55:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Czech Republic
Info Plaque representing the martyrdom of John of Nepomuk, being touched by a tourist, in the Charles bridge, Prague. Touching the falling priest on the plaque (which the tourist is not really doing...) is supposed to bring good luck and ensure your return. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I really like this picture. It depicts an unusual custom that's unusually common, and portrays a moment that was supposed to be frozen in time still being altered as time goes on – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:10, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support though I'd prefer a more descriptive title. You can see just how much rubbing has affected the plaque. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:06, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful hand with finely painted nails, but she seems to be hiding someone, or doing something different from the expected custom (i.e. "touching" the priest?) At the end it looks like the hand is a big fail, like "oops, there's a bombing hand in front of my sculpture" :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. --Yann (talk) 10:18, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:161 Crimson-breasted shrike in Otjozondjupa Region Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2026 at 19:47:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Malaconotidae_(Bushshrikes)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:47, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:47, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:26, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very well done --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 04:34, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:43, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:26, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice profile view. JayCubby (talk) 15:13, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:06, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LucaLindholm (talk) 20:42, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:30, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:49, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent, and it’s great how the bird’s shape is aligned within the bright part of the unsharp background, making the bird stand out even more against the background. – Aristeas (talk) 18:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:178 Male African bush elephant in Etosha National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2026 at 16:04:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:04, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:04, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. ~~I might push the white balance 10% toward neutral though.~~ JayCubby (talk) 16:29, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. The picture was taken during the golden hour of the afternoon so I don't want to change the white balance or the colors would not be accurate to reality anymore -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:41, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That would do it. The golden hour proper would begin a little later per this, but you are very much correct. JayCubby (talk) 18:50, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
On your link the hours shown are for London, the sunset is earlier in Namibia. Also on your link it says golden hour only lasts 29 minuts but in real life I already see golden colors 2 hours before sunset -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:30, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I can't share the results for a location, but Nambia's was +6:20 (London's would be two hours later). The proper golden hour feels more orange, I don't know why we call it that. JayCubby (talk) 19:45, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm probably wrong using the term golden hour but you get what I mean with the pre-golden hour colors of the afternoon. Also there was a bit of atmosphere for the sun to go through, which also contributes more to it -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:50, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Jakubhal 16:33, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:08, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Excellent quality and dynamic depiction of an impressive animal. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:11, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good! --Ermell (talk) 21:29, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:20, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light (fantastic), subject and quality (high level of detail) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:37, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile, great work! --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 04:36, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – An impressive shot of a magnificent creature striding across the landscape. —Bruce1ee^talk 11:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:45, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:10, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:07, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:49, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:29, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Bruce1ee. Aristeas (talk) 18:48, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lavant St. Ulrich Innenraum 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2026 at 15:30:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info Interior of the parish church St. Ulrich in Lavant, Tyrol, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:30, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:30, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Excellent quality. But the extreme distortion of the lateral altars is disturbing. Please compare the golden crosses there with the one at the center. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:58, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Stunning quality, but the crop is very close on the sides in my opinion, and there is distortion as pointed out by Alvesgaspar – Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:39, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment per Alves and Julian, since it is composed of several images, isn't there a little more space next to the side altars? --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 04:44, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Due to the crop and because it's slightly off-center with the carpet. HurricaneZeta^C 19:38, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kathmandu Durbar Square, Shiva Parvati Temple, Nepal (edit).jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2026 at 14:51:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Nepal
Info created and uploaded by Argenberg – edited and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:51, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:51, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing extraordinary mitigating the poor quality image. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:53, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alvesgaspar, I would have chosen this image --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 04:50, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I wouldn't call this bad quality: it might have been an FP if nominated in 2007 when it was taken, and it would be a good cell phone pic today. However, it is not close to FP quality for 2026. (I don't think the other one is, either. CAs and not a great composition IMO.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:10, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-eared Shrike-Babbler in Lava May 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2026 at 06:36:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Vireonidae_(Vireos)
Info (hard to photograph) All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:54, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:34, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very well captured and executed --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 04:51, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:07, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:49, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:27, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Achim/Syntaxys. – Aristeas (talk) 18:47, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow - 2026 - Kremlin Wall between the Vodovzvodnaya and the Annunciation Towers.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2026 at 05:53:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
Info Kremlin Wall texture. Moscow Kremlin Wall is a defensive wall that surrounds the Moscow Kremlin, built in 1485-1516. My photo Юрий Д.К. 05:53, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 05:53, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple with nice textures. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:55, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support And it looks the same as a brick wall only a century old! Great resolution, too. JayCubby (talk) 15:38, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:54, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm a fan of minimalism. That is why I cannot oppose this nom. But the picture lacks something exciting, not sure what. Maybe a broken brick, or one with a different color?... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:05, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:35, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's well done, and there are a few breaks in the visual flow that keep you engaged in the image. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 04:56, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:26, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Achim/Syntaxys. It’s essential that the light comes from the side, emphasizing the three-dimensionality of the bricks. – Aristeas (talk) 18:46, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:2025-11-04 D500-1610 Achim-Lammerts Calocera-viscosa.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2026 at 04:48:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Dacrymycetaceae
Info Fruit body of the Yellow Stagshorn (Calocera viscosa) on a mossy tree stump in the mixed forest near Jockgrim (Southern Palatinate), height approx. 1-4 cm. This is a very young fruiting body, probably only 1-2 days old, older specimens develop larger and denser fruiting bodies with many shoots (similar to a coral). Created, uploaded and nominated by Syntaxys, it's a re-nomination from an invalid set. -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 04:48, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 04:48, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 05:54, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:29, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:22, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive and beautiful, excellent light and colours. A very nice example of how impressive the small things in nature appear when we depict them in a large format. – Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:08, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support as previously. JayCubby (talk) 14:32, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice shot but the background bothers me a bit. --Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:53, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:25, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lutheran church in Boian (Bonnesdorf).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2026 at 15:34:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Romania
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 15:34, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 15:34, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 05:55, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like how the monumental church building fits in the rural ambient. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:56, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is the most accurate view of this church in its category, and the image is well done, with good composition. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:32, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good perspective, light and colours, and I love the contrast between the imposing building with its impressive history and the traces of rural decay. – Aristeas (talk) 19:35, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:08, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:24, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Female Hanbok From South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2026 at 10:16:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info all by -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but too dark. Yann (talk) 11:01, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I improved the light have a look please. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I did it again. The whites should be white. I also renamed the file and the nomination. Yann (talk) 07:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you dear Yann IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:39, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful picture with the new lighting changes – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:56, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking composition, enhanced whites bring elegance and clarity. Blurred background keeps focus firmly on the women, adding depth rather than distraction. Very graceful and visually compelling. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2026 (UTC)--[reply]
Oppose Original subject but blurry background, unappealing backs (+ mobile phone?) and grey sky. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:58, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The gray/grey sky doesn't ruin the photo. ★ 15:07, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and Arion. – Aristeas (talk) 18:45, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mottled Wood-Owl in Bhigwan August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 09.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2026 at 08:44:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:44, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:44, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The "beard" is striking! However, the characteristic reddish-brown mottling is mostly absent. This may be due to the high ISO 32,000 which tends to result in washed-out colours. Do you have an image with better colour, with less noise and without the crop of the tail? Conversion of this high ISO image to b/w may make it more impressive. --Tagooty (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I do have other images of this trip but mostly front view, this image shows the most of the bird. Check 1 & 2, I can add as alternative if you like. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I like 2, it has some wow-factor -- the branches on either side look like extended wings -- and better image quality. Note: as the two images were taken on a different days and have very different compositions, it should be a fresh nomination, not an alternative (ref the FPC guidelines). Tagooty (talk) 14:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I will nominate that later then. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:08, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Owls are usually not easy to find with good light conditions. I think the quality is ok considering it's at 32000 ISO. If possible, would be even better to have the bottom of the tail uncropped -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:17, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for understanding, actually the tail was behind the branch, a little more space would have been much better I know. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:17, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Giles. Yann (talk) 16:58, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:25, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough quality for a FP, most especially the lack of detail caused by the severe noise. I also don't like the cropped tail. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:01, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Giles.--Ermell (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Despite high ISO and cropped tail, the owl's posture and expression are striking. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:30, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice posture, but washed out colours (reddish-brown missing from the mottling), lack of detail and noisy. --Tagooty (talk) 03:10, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Giles and Radomianin. Honestly I fail to see why the little noise should be so terrible. Sharpness is better than in some recently successful candidates of much easier subjects. Actually the quality is stunning for ISO 32,000 – this would have been impossible a few years ago. – Aristeas (talk) 19:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The bright sky in the background is disturbing, and it lacks details. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reflection of the Flamingo Hotel in front of the Bellagio.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2026 at 16:55:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Reflections (only) on objects
Info Created, uploaded, and nominated by Julian Lupyan – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info This picture was taken on one of Las Vegas's characteristic glass-sided pedestrian bridges, on which I was lucky enough to notice this reflection. The image is a single frame, not a composite, and portrays two major casinos in the same picture, even though they are opposite each other. I'm curious to see opinions about this, since it was quite difficult to take and a bit out there. I believe it characterizes the overwhelming and clashing feeling of the Vegas Strip quite well. I'm uncertain which gallery I should put it under, so changes are welcome. Thank you! – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This image is visually very complex and not easy to "decipher" at the first glance. I think this is what renders it exciting to look at. Just two minor details that I think could be improved: The building on the very right is leaning outward, and the image is lacking geocoding (which is probably relevant in this case). --Aciarium (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Doing… Thank you very much for the pointers, will have this fixed soon – Julian Lupyan (talk) 19:34, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Aciarium: – Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:15, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support @Julian Lupyan: Support per above. Thank you! --Aciarium (talk) 08:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support A really exiting candidate. I love photos which at first glance appear enigmatic and force us to think in order to understand them. At the same time, the shot is also truly attractive and (in my opinion) an impressive representation of the Las Vegas Strip, much better than many of the usual photos, in which the grandiose architecture often appears somewhat banal. – Aristeas (talk) 10:37, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 05:57, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:26, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:12, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The nomination is very creative and you’ve captured exactly what you wanted, but the end result isn’t a truly outstanding composition in my opinion because of the distracting objects from the street in the lower part. I prefer a more minimalist approach with only the two casinos in the frame, which was perhaps achievable if you lowered down the camera to move the reflection upwards (I believe it was possible to position the reflection by moving around with the camera as it [the reflection] appears to be quite strong.). Moreover, the picture looks a bit grainy, and there’s slight chromatic aberration on the edges of Belaggio’s building. That’s my opinion. I hope it’s helpful. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:11, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the thoughts Kiril, I agree I should’ve taken another picture composed that way too when I had the chance, that would’ve been a great idea. As for the grain, this was with my old D3500 so the image quality unfortunately couldn’t be as good as my newer pictures. I will do my best on the CA and let you know. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:16, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Kiril Simeonovski: Done Chromatic aberration removed, denoised as far as I could without removing too much detail – Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:36, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice idea, confusing outcome. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:13, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo captures a fleeting, almost surreal reflection of the Flamingo and Bellagio, compressing the chaos and spectacle of the Las Vegas Strip into a single, striking frame. The interplay of perspective and symmetry transforms a simple reflection into a layered, engaging composition, handled with subtle technical skill, making this a distinctive interpretation of the Strip's energy. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:39, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas and Radomianin, you'll remain captivated by this image and attempt to determine what you are seeing. A very intriguing candidate. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:44, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Confusing, as Alvesgar already wrote. --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:02, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pacific National freight train Virginia, SA.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2026 at 16:08:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Australia
Info A Pacific National freight train in Virginia, South Australia. Created by Tomoyn – uploaded by Tomoyn – nominated by Cutlass -- Cutlass ^Ciera 16:08, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cutlass ^Ciera 16:08, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:13, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 19:25, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:25, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:10, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- I fail to see anything extraordinary in this picture. Just a high quality image of a train. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:51, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Does FP require images to have something extraordinary in them? I feel like this argument does not make sense. Cutlass ^Ciera 21:17, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That is precisely what I think! A featured picture is not (should not be) just a very high quality image, but part of the very best Commons has to offer. Thus, adjectives like extraordinary, exceptional, magic or unique come naturally to my mind when I evaluate a candidate. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alvesgaspar. This is a perfectly good photo, but all the FPs by Kabelleger and others have set the bar for photos of trains in landscapes very high, and what makes those photos great is that they are not at all merely photos of trains, but photos of great landscapes with trains and often bridges and such in them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, "train in landscape, taken from afar" is almost a cliché at this point for a rail vehicle FA. Considering the number of train FAs fitting that definition, at least for me, this image is more interesting. Cutlass ^Ciera 16:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Great landscape compositions never become boring or mere cliches to me. The idea is absurd to me. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cutlass has a point here. The image may look boring in the thumbnail, but if I look at it in full size it really impresses me; the train appears imposing, and this is one of the rare case where heat haze/distortion adds to an image, because it increases the dramatic touch of the scene and adds depth to it. – Aristeas (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others (COM:I: Featured pictures candidates should meet all the following requirements, must have a "wow factor"). Aristeas notices the thumbnail looks "boring", but at full size the empty foreground becomes too dominant in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't agree with the opposers. The mirage in this picture is really special. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:25, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stockholms stadshus February 2026 02.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2026 at 09:09:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden
Info Winter view of Stockholm City Hall and Riddarfjärden in Stockholm. I like all the elements here. People skate across the ice, small groups pause and gather in the winter light, and the older passenger boat makes its way carefully through the frozen surface. Together, they transform a static cityscape into something dynamic and human. This kind of thick, walkable ice has become increasingly rare in Stockholm in recent year. Created, uploaded, and nominated by ArildV
Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:09, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cutlass ^Ciera 17:09, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:22, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:25, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice composition and execution. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:46, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Achim/Syntaxys, and I like the contrast between the warm winter sun and the ice. – Aristeas (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:10, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:22, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Aristeas (talk) 18:41, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden

File:Kulmbach Plassenburg Luftbild-20240907-RM-164034.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2026 at 21:36:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info Plassenburg Castle in Kulmbach seen from the southwest. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition, light and architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:14, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 07:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasant view and composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:45, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the bottom crop is too tight, the cropped road on the left side is distracting and the composition would benefit from more sky. I think the subject is featurable if captured from greater distance. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:00, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just one more of the German castles. We have many of them featured. I miss something like Chinese pagodas… ★ 19:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for your suggestion. I will think about that.--Ermell (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (as renomination)… ★ 23:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support More crop at the bottom would make it look more unbalanced because of the extra wide angle. Looks fine to me. Of course, ArionStar, I always appreciate more diversity in the subjects, I indeed try to contribute my grain of sand there (not China, but other exotic destinations) Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Why not China? ★ 19:30, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:57, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:10, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan and Poco a Poco. – Aristeas (talk) 19:23, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:21, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babosa de mar (Felimare picta webbi), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-09, DD 60.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2026 at 19:20:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
Info Nudibranch (Felimare picta webbi) surrounded by seeweed (Dictyota dichotoma), Teno-Rasca marine strip, Tenerife, Spain. Felimare picta lives on rocky seabeds throughout the Mediterranean Sea, European waters, the Eastern North Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico in depths between 0–55 metres (0–180 ft). They are usually 10–15 centimetres (3.9–5.9 in) long and feed mainly on sponges of the genus Dysidea. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:20, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:20, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty. Could you add a category for at least the most prominent seaweed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek: Done, thanks Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:25, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:26, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incredible creature, good photo. – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:ILanz, plaats in Graubünden. 27-09-2025. (actm.) 47.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2026 at 05:33:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Switzerland
Info ILanz, Reformierte Kirche Ilanz, (decorative vaulted ceiling.) Decorative vaulted ceiling of the old church in Lanz (a national monument, built in 1494). The decorations depict symbols of the evangelists.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:33, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
{{* Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:33, 28 February 2026 (UTC)I choose the alternative photo.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but IMHO several things here are not up to FP. First of all, that bar in the middle of the image, that's a dealbreaker. Furthermore I find the ceiling too simple, and if there is an interesting spot that's the one at the top that has been cropped. Poco a poco (talk) 12:22, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you for your comment about my photo. It's about an old, small church from 1494. The beam you're referring to is one of the tie rods (wall anchors) that hold the exterior walls together. That's part of the church. You also find the decoration too simple. Tastes differ, but I find these religious depictions beautiful and very refined. I've added another photo as an alternative; perhaps the decoration will look better in that one.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:16, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Good quality. The use of a tripod here was very efficient. Unfortunately the bar in the middle is distracting, the wow factor low in my subjective view, and I agree with Poco the composition is not breathtaking -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:58, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info with a different distribution of the decoration.
Support I like this one better.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much better imo and the beams for some reason are not distracting in this version. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:57, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality. The use of a tripod here was very efficient. Unfortunately the two bars are distracting, the wow factor low in my subjective view, and the angle of view not special enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:58, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me. The ceiling is beautiful, esp. the colours, the quality is fine, and I can easily ignore the bars, probably because their simple shape is so different from all forms of the ceiling. – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File: Воздушен поглед на Радожда 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2026 at 18:05:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#North Macedonia
Info There are three main motifs in this composition: 1) Lake Ohrid 2) the village of Radožda and 3) Jablanica mountain. Each motif is presented in a different shape (the lake is rectangular, the village is in the shape of an inverted triangle and the mountain is in the shape of a triangle) with distinct textures. The composition is additionally enriched with the pier, which connects the village with the lake, and the rocks, which make a smooth transition from the village to the mountain. Created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good aerial pic, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 05:27, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good to me. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but the horizontal composition doesn't work in my view. Drone photos are becoming common, and neither these roofs nor the light at 10:30 am are extraordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:19, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the roofs aren’t extraordinary, but I disagree on the other points you make. The landscape orientation is what makes this composition work as the lines and shapes are more prominent. A vertical orientation would result in longer lines and irregular shapes. As for the light, this is probably the best period of the day to avoid an annoying sun patch on the surface of the lake, which would be observed if it was taken at noon or in the early afternoon, or shadows from the houses, which would be observed if it was taken in the late afternoon. Finally, if drone images are becoming common, it would be nice from you to point out to some FPs of a similar subject taken with a drone as useful examples. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:24, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Useful, many photos can be useful on Commons. Google Map is useful too. But extraordinary with 1 third of flat water, 1 third of standard roofs, and 1 third of arid land? What I expect from FPC is pictures that offer something special, unique, fascinating, uncommon. A structure unlikely to spot from the window of an airplane -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:59, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:11, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Basile Morin – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Just an acceptable quality aerial image, not extraordinary either in the subject or composition. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I concur with Alvesgaspar Poco a poco (talk) 18:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 10:22, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fishing Boat Nets Sholayar Valparai Feb26 A7CR 10156.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2026 at 14:34:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
Info Fishing boat with nylon nets in late evening, Sholayar Reservoir, Valparai, Tamil Nadu, India. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 14:34, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 14:34, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support the nets add a splash of colour to an otherwise dull coloured scene. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 15:12, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The background seems a little bit noisy to me – Julian Lupyan (talk) 00:40, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Julian Lupyan: The noise is due to the low evening light and high ISO. I've further increased the NR in the background. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:44, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much better, thank you! – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:18, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'd call it a splash of color in an otherwise peaceful scene. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I find the background distracting and the image quite noisy. The noise reduction has caused the colors to appear washed out. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 20:50, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ok for me, however some noise here. Юрий Д.К. 04:27, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support If noise could be reduced better, that would be great. Better the fishermen are using real nets than mosquito netting. JayCubby (talk) 18:40, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Works for me thanks to the stunning contrast between the colourful nets and the subdued colours of the surroundings. – Aristeas (talk) 19:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:11, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pez ángel de Lamarck (Genicanthus lamarck), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-25, DD 21.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2026 at 12:32:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacanthidae_(Marine_angelfish)
Info

Blackstriped angelfish (Genicanthus lamarck), Anilao, Philippines. They are normally observed over the bottom in small harems with a dominant male and 2-6 females. They are sequential protogynous hermaphrodites and if the male in a harem goes missing the dominant female changes sex to become male. It occurs in the Indo-West Pacific region at depths between 10–50 metres (33–164 ft). Note: there are no FPs of the genus Genicanthus, containing 10 species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:32, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:32, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bland colours and composition compared to the several FPs of angelfish. Some parts of the fish are blurry. --Tagooty (talk) 14:42, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record, the current FP of anglefishes we have today are much bigger than this one, getting the same detail in this case is much more difficult. Poco a poco (talk) 10:35, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Satisfying composition and good details to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:09, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:01, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The pelvic fin is noisy in contrast to the rest of the picture. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:04, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kiril Simeonovski: Done, I've also brightened it a bit up. Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like how the fish stands out from the calming background with harmonious colours. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan and Kiril. – Aristeas (talk) 11:21, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:10, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:08, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Kiril. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:27, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:55, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Igreja de São Francisco de Assis (37555632214) (B&W).jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2026 at 16:45:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Building exteriors
Info created by Oscar Niemeyer – photographed by Nicolas de Camaret – initially uploaded by Sturm – edited and nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:45, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another Oscar Niemeyer's great work and part of the Pampulha Modern Ensemble, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. -- ★ 16:45, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment High-quality photograph technically, but why black & white, and why these crops, which feel a bit arbitrary to me? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:14, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Black and white match with the modernist style of the church, IMO. The crop is not arbitrary; it is the roof the building. ★ 19:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the lower cut, and I think the colour version gives a better impression of the material on the front — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berthold Werner (talk • contribs) 09:04, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 15:02, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC09611 Search and Rescue Dog, Austrian Red Cross Perchtoldsdorf, 2024-10.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2026 at 16:21:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Domestic dogs
Info A young labrador retriever of the Austrian Red Cross search and rescue dog unit. Photo by me. --Aciarium (talk) 16:21, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Aciarium (talk) 16:21, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nicely composed pup-portrait. Some chromatic aberration visible on the jacket stitching, GPS might be relevant. Feel free to revert any of the categories I added. JayCubby (talk) 16:52, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I have reduced CA and added geocoding. Thank you for the review and for adding categories! —Aciarium (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support You really show how alert the dog is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:16, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lighting and posture work also well here --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:27, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not outstanding enough for me for FP, bad background --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:42, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful lighting and posture, per PantheraLeo – Julian Lupyan (talk) 14:21, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Uoaei1. Yann (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same opinion and the DoF is definitely too shallow Poco a poco (talk) 14:54, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @Poco a poco: I understand that the DoF could be a bit deeper, but I think it overall fits the subject? --Aciarium (talk) 16:10, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info @Uoaei1 and Yann: I tried to clone out the distracting car. Please reevaluate. --Aciarium (talk) 16:10, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, much better. Yann (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping to the other voters as well @JayCubby, Ikan Kekek, PantheraLeo1359531, Julian Lupyan, and Poco a poco: for alternative. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:47, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And a Support from me. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:47, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support though the car didn't bother me. JayCubby (talk) 21:50, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support both good for me, per JayCubby – Julian Lupyan (talk) 00:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just how much of the photo should be edited out? My feeling is, if you're going to edit out the car, edit out the snow, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:13, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I generally support your idea. Sadly, I don't have the best software/abilities for rather intricate masking; cloning out the car was comparably easy for me since it did not interfere much with the dog. Aciarium (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
SupportGood for me --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:28, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:05, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done, and IMHO this was the right amount of editing – the car was distracting and not an important part of the image, while the snow adds a bit to the atmosphere. – Aristeas (talk) 11:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alert, expressive portrait, beautifully composed and lit. Cloning out the distracting car enhances focus. Personally, it brings to mind the German verse: "The dog stayed faithful to me in the storm, the human not even in the wind". Loyalty and character clearly shine through. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:14, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:52, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:13, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:GNR London Stadium 2017 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2026 at 16:15:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Male singers
Info created by Raph_PH – uploaded by SilverBullitt – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (^talk/_edits) 16:15, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shame we don't have any good photos of Axl Rose from the 90s. We have only this one. -- heylenny (^talk/_edits) 16:15, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The file description is not so descriptive of the image. JayCubby (talk) 16:46, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Can you change it to a better description, then? Commons is a collaborative project. Thanks heylenny (^talk/_edits) 17:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done heylenny (^talk/_edits) 22:47, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:43, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The WB appears off. People (usually) aren't blue. JayCubby (talk) 00:14, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:30, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per JayCubby. Another thing: To me, there is a lot of empty space especially on the left side of the subject and I don't think that this aspect ratio works particularly well for a photo. Maybe cropping it to 3:2 or 4:3 (still in landscape) could be worth a try? --Aciarium (talk) 07:34, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not crop it on the left (where he is facing), but a crop on the right would be OK. Yann (talk) 11:24, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This photographer uploaded a lot of great pictures but this one is not one of them. It doesn't even meet QI standards. --Selbymay (talk) 14:51, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped and edited version

Info Cropped and WB adjusted. ★ 21:57, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support this version as well. --heylenny (^talk/_edits) 22:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@JayCubby, Aciarium, Yann, Selbymay, Kiril Simeonovski, MZaplotnik, and Tisha Mukherjee: What do you think about this version? --heylenny (^talk/_edits) 22:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose @Heylenny: Crop still doesn't convince me (heavy loading to the right, empty space to the left). But as mentioned before: Sharpness is the main issue. --Aciarium (talk) 23:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I cropped the image using the ideia of the rule of thirds and lead room. ★ 14:58, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, better. Sharpness is fine for a concert picture. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better! --MZaplotnik^(talk) 11:59, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In both versions, I really don't get sucked in by a picture in which we can't see his eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support better frame - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:33, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rescue on Pit River Bridge.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2026 at 15:37:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical/1900s#1950-1959
Info created by Virginia Schau on a Kodak Brownie – uploaded by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 15:37, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photograph, of two truckers being rescued after driving their truck over the railing of the Pit River Bridge, won the 1954 Pulitzer Prize for Photography. Schau's biography is an interesting read. -- JayCubby (talk) 15:37, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Impressive subject. Certainly, sharpness and framing could be better, but I think it is important to consider that this is a more than 70 years old image with quite some wow effect. (I prefer the alternative over this) --Aciarium (talk) 16:10, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review, @Aciarium! I played with the sharpness while trying not to bring out the grain. Two possible attempts are at https://ibb.co/RpT0xJz6 and https://ibb.co/VW79pc9v. Would you prefer either over the current version? (ImgBB is recovering from another outage, so the files are slow in loading). JayCubby (talk) 16:44, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think the first link is the best of the three versions. Would you like to offer it as an alt? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:23, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
+1 --Aciarium (talk) 07:21, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aciarium. --Yann (talk) 18:42, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support From my own experience with b&w film photography this version appears more authentic to me. – Aristeas (talk) 11:10, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Unsharp mask + layer blending. Ping User:Aciarium, User:Ikan Kekek, User:Yann. JayCubby (talk) 19:09, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support either version. JayCubby (talk) 19:09, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No improvement. Yann (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my remarks above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:46, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support While the original version was not bad, I think the sharpened one is significantly better. @JayCubby: Thanks for improving it! --Aciarium (talk) 07:21, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:48, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The edited version is good, too. – Aristeas (talk) 11:10, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:52, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:46, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erfurt - Rathaus 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2026 at 10:12:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Thuringia
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:12, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:08, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:42, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the left crop, but the right crop is wider than I'd prefer. I'd suggest cropping the brighter building to the right in half, just between the windows. Yes, that would produce asymmetrical crops. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP for me. However, Ikan's idea about the crop may improve the photo, but still very good work. Юрий Д.К. 20:48, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done Cropped as proposed --Llez (talk) 21:20, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you. I do think it makes a big difference and produces a neat composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Llez: Would you mind nominating the original composition as an alternative? I honestry liked that a bit more. --Aciarium (talk) 07:49, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:27, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer the alternative -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:27, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Cropped as proposed by Aciarium --Llez (talk) 08:03, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support @Llez: Thank you! I appreciate the horizontal symmetry. --Aciarium (talk) 08:06, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:27, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one is good as well. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one looks more balanced to me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:24, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:02, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Good too.MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:58, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per my remarks above, in favor of the other version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:39, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:26, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 04:20, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:13, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Daft Punk in 2013

Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2026 at 06:48:53 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

Promotional picture of Daft Punk after the release of Random Access Memories in 2013, medium shot
Promotional picture of Daft Punk after the release of Random Access Memories in 2013, medium long shot

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
Info created by Sony Music Entertainment – uploaded by Wikitest2222 – nominated by It's moon -- It's moon (talk) 06:48, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- It's moon (talk) 06:48, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 07:19, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The top crop of the right picture is unfortunate. Furthermore this isn't complying with any of the criterias for nomination like a set. I recommend you to nominate the left picture as standalone. Poco a poco (talk) 12:24, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:42, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco. --Yann (talk) 18:44, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The top crop doesn't ruin this impressive promotional set. ★ 19:17, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco. I would support the left picture if it were nominated as a standalone. --Aciarium (talk) 12:26, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above. Will support left picture – Julian Lupyan (talk) 14:26, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I doubt this is a good set. Would probably support the left one. – Aristeas (talk) 19:26, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per others above. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]