Commons:特色靚相候選

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:FPC Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

呢度係成為特色靚相嘅候選區。請留意呢度唔係同每日靚相一樣

要知道之前有乜提名,睇睇:Commons:等色靚相/紀錄

Contents

正式嘅事物[edit]

提名[edit]

如果您認為您已經創作或搵到一張可能有價值的圖片,請將佢加到「提名」部分嘅最頂部。用呢個連結加入。

喺您提名之前,請肯定已經喺相應的圖片加上適當嘅版權標籤

請喺投票嘅時候利用您嘅語言或者使用下面嘅模板

  • 支持 - Support, Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, ...
  • 反對 - Oppose, No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, ...

另外,您亦可以使用模板{{Oppose}}同{{Support}}

您亦可以表達使用{{I love}}代表您喜歡呢張圖片或您想利用{{Neutral}}嚟表達您嘅睇法。

特色靚相候選方針[edit]

  • 14 日投票持間。結果將會喺提名後嘅第 15 日公佈決定。
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅提名
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅討論貢獻
  • 匿名貢獻者嘅投票不作計算
  • 提名者不會計作票數。必須另作解釋作出支持。
  • 記住,Wikimedia Commons 計劃嘅目標係提供一個中央式嘅檔案庫,以提供所有 Wikimedia 計劃(包括未來的計劃)裏使用。呢個唔只係於置 Wikipedia 嘅圖片,因此呢啲圖片唔係只針對嗰個計劃作出決定。

要成功登上特色靚相,必須合乎以下嘅條件。

  • 合理嘅牌照 (當然)
  • 最少 5 張支持票
  • 支持/反對嘅比例最少為 2:1 (三分二多數,即最少 67% 支持)

有關點樣處理舊嘅提名,睇睇Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished

更新呢一頁:purge this page's cache

提名[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Altmühltal Apollofalter.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2018 at 18:27:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Lago Kluane, Destruction Bay, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-25, DD 70-76 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2018 at 15:00:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kluane Lake, Destruction Bay, Yukon, Canada
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panoramic view of Kluane Lake, near Destruction Bay, Yukon, Canada. The lake is located in the southwest area of the Yukon and, with 408 km2 (158 sq mi), is the largest lake enterely contained within the state. All by me, Poco2 15:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Poco2 15:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support . Well done! Excellent, pleasant and atmospheric picture -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - I really feel like I'm there when looking through this picture. Just a small point: It would be the largest lake in the territory. Canada has provinces and territories, no states. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Hemerocallis fulva 2018 G1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2018 at 15:32:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Orange Daylily after a rain

File:CatedraldeBariloche.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2018 at 13:08:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cathedral of Our Lady of Nahuel Huapi, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Bad light, perspective distortion. Yann (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2018 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Common cottongrass in a cliff crevice.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2018 at 09:16:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common cottongrass in a cliff crevice
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Poales
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info c, u, n by -- Cart (talk) 09:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Cart (talk) 09:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Excellent light and sharpness.--Peulle (talk) 12:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Empty part on the left is distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment - I agree with Basile. I would be likely to support if the leftmost third or so to the left of the prominent blade of grass were cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:49, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • I expected that comment since the compo is the same as in this nom. Having that "breathing space" to the left is a matter of taste, to me it brings the big open airy places where these plants grow into the picture. I'm very reluctant to crop it, since that would be like fencing it in, boxing and package it. I understand that to those who haven't seen this plant in its true environment, it is just another cute fluffy grass, so oppinions will differ. --Cart (talk) 20:50, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Swing into books, Book week, November 1-7, 1964.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2018 at 03:49:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swing into books. Book week, November 1-7, 1964

File:View of Helldalsisen and the peak from Blåfjell.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2018 at 20:42:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Helldalsisen glacier and a variety of mountains from Blåfjell
  • As I see this landscape, nearly everything is in the darkness. The luminous small rock in the foreground is nice, but isolated. Not sure you can manage to light this valley artificially -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Yes, much of it is kind of dark, but it is also a special glow to the landscape because of the very low sun. --Frankemann (talk) 16:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't know, but I wasn't disturbed by the light: It was the amount of haze that was my issue. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • I understand what you mean Ikan Kekek. I think it is due to high ISO and a lot of humidity in the air. I have purchased a very small and easy tripod for such occasions. Too bad I had no such thing on this trip. --Frankemann (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Nice light and very instructive. --Milseburg (talk) 10:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Per Milseburg --Code (talk) 13:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per Ikan. --Basotxerri (talk) 21:33, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Ryxö island nature reserve in Brofjorden.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2018 at 17:35:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ryxö island nature reserve in Brofjorden
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Sweden
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info In the 60s, this area was the focus of one of the hottest debates in Sweden, as plans were made to build Scandinavia's biggest oil refinery and oil port so close to a nature reserve. This gave the newly awakened environmental movement a push and the refinery was made to be "the world's safest and most beautiful", with most of the operation underground, blasted into the granite cliffs. The reserve is so far untouched and has a variety of local wildlife plus a heard of cows. In this photo I managed to catch four roe deer down by the shore. The photo is taken from a ledge overlooking the flatlands of the old Rixö granite quarry (shown here). There used to be a hill there, as big and high as the one I'm standing on, but it got chopped up and shipped off to Germany to be used in the construction of Autobahn. No such quantities of durable granite could be obtained in Germany and everything was shipped from the quay down left in the photo. The water snaking off towards the horizon is the inlet of Brofjorden, today trafficked by tankers. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 17:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Cart (talk) 17:35, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:35, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:55, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Cernina fluctuata 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2018 at 10:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shell of a Wavy Moon Snail, Cernina fluctuata

File:People for Animals rescusing stranded mules during the Uttarakhand Floods 2013.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2018 at 06:40:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mules during 2013 North India floods
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment - I don't see how we could know that other members of the Animal Kingdom are incapable of feeling hope. Otherwise, I agree, but it's best for you also not to editorialize about things we can't know. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • It's anthropomorphising, if we want to be technical about it ;-). I see also the editorialising is in the FPC note too. That's too much. Please keep this sort of thing off of Commons. We're just an image repository. -- Colin (talk) 09:53, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • I agree, but I'm saying, it's also best for you not to make that kind of declarative statement of your opinion on this if you don't want a discussion. Note that I've avoided stating my opinion except to say that I don't see how we could know that all animal species other than Homo sapiens couldn't possibly feel hope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per Basile Morin.--Peulle (talk) 14:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per all above, and because, despite the filename, no people are in the image "rescusing" anything. Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Hermagor Görtschach Filialkirche hl. Heinrich NW-Ansicht 18062018 3636.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2018 at 06:11:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Northwestern view of the subsidiary church Saint Henry the Emperor in Görtschach, Hermagor, Carinthia, Austria
  • BA candidate.svg  Weak oppose Seems overly processed to me. There is a mildly disturbing halo around the steeple in the sky, but there also seems something wrong with the overall contrast. The face of the tower also seems quite disturbing to me. Storkk (talk) 10:40, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓  Done @Storkk: Thanks for your valuable review. According to your hints some modifications were made. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks. It looks significantly better to me now, enough to strike the oppose. Something is still bugging me about the shadows, but not enough to oppose. Storkk (talk) 11:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Not the light one would want, but a very good job with it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Techelsberg Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin Kaplanei 31012015 752.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2018 at 06:03:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sacristan house and parish church Saint Martin in Sankt Martin, Techelsberg, Carinthia, Austria

File:Residence on No. 45, Route Pichon.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2018 at 05:33:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Photo of No. 45 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, designed by Ladislav Hudec. Built in 1932, it was the former official residence for Deputy Inspector-General of the Chinese Maritime Customs Service. It is listed in the Shanghai Cultural Relics Protection Unit and the Shanghai Heritage Architecture List.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose The size is better but sorry the verticals have not been fixed. The top of the building is thinner than the base. You need to use a software like Lightroom or Photoshop to change the appearance and make it closer to the reality. But my oppose is because after correction, there will be too little space on the right of the building, with the roof cut. So unless this image is a crop from a larger file you can compose differently with more space on the right, I'm afraid the whole will look tight within the space -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment There is also some confusion in the beginning of the file's history. The original file was uploaded by Antigng and Fayhoo overwrote it with a completely different photo of the house. --Cart (talk) 11:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
@W.carter: That's why I created File:Residence on No. 45, Route Pichon (old).jpg, since Antigng's version is of low quality in my opinion. --WQL (talk) 11:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Ok, that seems like a roundabout and unusual way of doing it when the overwrite could have been moved to a new file instead. --Cart (talk) 11:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Too much distortion.--Peulle (talk) 14:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose As per Peulle --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per Basil and Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Perspective distortion. Yann (talk) 18:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Fondamenta Zacchere Rio delle Muneghe Venezia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2018 at 19:05:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Houses on Fondamenta Sacchere and the Rio delle Muneghe canal in Venice

File:Heliopsis helianthoides flower.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2018 at 10:33:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Heliopsis helianthoides
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Sed imago mihi valde placet. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Confirmo Non est satis fugatur et esse in centro, non est a forsit. Daniel Case (talk) 14:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Confirmo - Sed etiam imago mihi valde placet-- P999 (talk) 00:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Colorful floating bungalows in Don Khon, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2018 at 09:04:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Colorful floating bungalows in Don Khon, Laos

File:Colorful shophouses in Koon Seng Road, Singapore.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2018 at 09:02:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Colorful shophouses in Koon Seng Road, Singapore

File:Loxura atymnus-Kadavoor-2018-06-18-001.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2018 at 09:11:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Loxura atymnus
  • Category: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Loxura atymnus, Yamfly, is a species of Lycaenidae found in Asia. There are several types of nectaries in the orchids, including extrafloral types that secrete nectar on the outside of the buds or inflorescence while the flower is developing. In contrast to floral nectaries, nectar produced outside the flower generally have a defensive function. The nectar attracts predatory insects which will eat both the nectar and any plant-eating insects around, thus functioning as 'bodyguards'. Foraging predatory insects show a preference for plants with extrafloral nectaries, particularly some species of ants and wasps, which have been observed to directly defend the plants. Loxura atymnus is famous for consuming nectar secreted from the extrafloral nectaries stimulated by the ants. Here they are on a Philippine orchid bud along with some Yellow crazy ants. C/U/N by Jkadavoor -- Jee 09:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Jee 09:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Colin (talk) 10:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --El Grafo (talk) 11:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Cart (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support But please remove the dust spot (see note). --A.Savin 12:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I requested one of my friends here to help as no processing tool available in the old computer now I'm using. Jee 13:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • What happend to your computer? --Cart (talk) 14:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • @Jee: OK, I saw it now already -- I think it would be then unfair to demand you to fix it -- no problem, I'll fix it for you (it's quite easy), but as we have the occasion, maybe you send me your raw file -- I would also try to fix the noise better. If interested, mail me? --A.Savin 20:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • A.Savin and Jee I've uploaded a version of the JPG without the dust spot. Then afterwards a version processed from RAW that tries to be as similar to the original as I can get it, and it has less JPG noise/artefacts. -- Colin (talk) 22:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Yeah, it's definitely better. --A.Savin 22:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks Colin and Alex. Jee 01:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Acosmeryx shervillii mounted specimen[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2018 at 09:10:44 (UTC)

File:A pier at a campsite during sunset, Sidney Spit (part of Gulf Islands National Park Reserve), Sidney Island, British Columbia, Canada 20.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2018 at 03:39:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A pier at a campsite during sunset, Sidney Spit, Sidney Island, British Columbia, Canada
Thank you, Ikan Kekek, I might give the picture you mentioned a go after this nomination is finished. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File:I think its gonna rain today.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2018 at 12:50:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rainy Dutch landscape
  • Please add a category above. Yann (talk) 12:54, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Regarding the file's name, please read Commons:File naming and consider renaming the file. Since people need to be able to search this huge archive to find the right photo, names must be accurate and not poetic or misleading. Flickr names are seldom ok in that respect. --Cart (talk) 12:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose even if properly named; it's unsharp and very noisy, as well as nearly blown at the right. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Good idea but technically badly implemented.--Ermell (talk) 06:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Sputnik (talk) 11:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --WQL (talk) 05:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose - I'm not amazed by the composition. I'd like the photo better if only the right side with the higher cloud were in the picture. To my eyes, the left side kind of sits there - not that there wasn't activity in real life, but just as a composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:32, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Not very sharp and colour noise in the sky --Llez (talk) 10:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Dutch bicycle.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2018 at 10:21:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dutch bicycle a.k.a Roadster bicycle
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Other land vehicles
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Dutch bicycle a.k.a Roadster bicycle. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Mile (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment It's a great capture of the bike, but couldn't you find a less busy background to photograph it against? The person in the yellow neon jacket is rather disturbing. --Cart (talk) 11:06, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose An excellent sharp photo of a normal Dutch bicycle, but the people behind the bicycle are spoiling the composition.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per Michielverbeek. Daniel Case (talk) 20:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose - Regrettably, background is too distracting. -- P999 (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Front view of Milan Stazione Centrale entrance portico.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2018 at 22:40:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Front portico of Milano Centrale railroad station
✓  Done Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - Big improvement. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support I like that there are everyday people milling about, coming or going somewhere. Not a sterile monument or some place with gawking tourists. --Cart (talk) 09:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Sorry, I don't find it particularly interesting. Harsh midday light; the structures in the front spoil the view (yes, it's not up to the photographer). And the quality could have been better -- a bit too soft at the sides --A.Savin 17:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Exactly as I remember it. -- P999 (talk) 21:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per A.Savin. -- King of ♠ 04:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Nice station but the confusion of the people as well as the decreasing sharpness to the sides reduce the good impression. I can't detect a wow effect either.--Ermell (talk) 06:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
If it matters to anyone who doesn't have issues with the composition, I have sharpened up the sides. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Río Copper, Glennallen, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 114.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2018 at 20:01:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of the Copper River, Glennallen, Alaska, United States.
  • I also think it should be rotated... Yann (talk) 10:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Cayambe (talk) 05:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Cart (talk) 09:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose The image is tilted. Apart from that technical problem, I don't find the landscape really awesome. The person could bring something special, but unfortunately his back and action are not very interesting in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment I applied a tilt --Poco2 18:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support with tilt correction. --Yann (talk) 22:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Jee 01:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- King of ♠ 04:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Llez (talk) 11:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Cezembre 2 cropped.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2018 at 16:03:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cezembre island after bombing in August 1944
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose (Edit conflict) File:Cezembre_Bombing_2.jpg already is a comparably low quality digital reproduction. (Handwriting/Typewriter is unsharp, so the rest is also not as sharp as it could be. At least in the areas depicting the main photograph, it also has some weird JPG artifacts that clearly show the borders between the 8x8 pixel blocks used by the jpg algorithm (best seen at 300% zoom, but it affects picture quality at normal magnifications as well).) Something went wrong there. The version presented here, on top of all that also has a considerably reduced color palette: the "original" had 252 shades of grey (normal for 8-bit grayscale), this one has a mere 39 unique values. This results in what I'm tempted to call strong pixel-level posterization. Something went very wrong there.
TL;DR: This is a very bad digital reproduction and even if it was improved by re-cropping the source file it would still be a pretty bad digital reproduction. --El Grafo (talk) 09:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Yann's edit fixed the "posterization" issue, but the rest of my comment remains untouched by that … --El Grafo (talk) 09:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Certainly a valuable image, but not excellent on the technical and aesthetic aspects -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment Thanks everyone for the input, and thanks to Yann for improving all the images I uploaded of the bombing of Cezembre. I understand this falls short of the requirements here, and I will therefore submit this picture to the Valued Images. Skimel (talk) 21:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File:American white pelican 3 cropped.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2018 at 11:20:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A non-breeding American white pelican (Pelecanus erythrorhynchos) in the Putrajaya Wetlands, part of Peninsular Malaysia. Note that the black flight feathers are hidden within the white plumage.

File:München BW 2017-03-16 19-55-33.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2018 at 07:46:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Germany, Munich, Nationaltheater
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 07:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 07:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Don't think this one compares well to our existing German Architecture FPs. The light for much of the building is not great and rather flat. The bright light star is distracting. The left side is quite blurred. -- Colin (talk) 12:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per Colin. To add to his critique, the additional architecture on either side, and the posts in front, are distracting. There also seems to be a slight tilt. Daniel Case (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per others. A good photo and worth nominating, but not IMO outstanding enough for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:25, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Ich weiß, wie schwierig es einem der Platz macht, ein halbwegs perfektes Bild zu bekommen... :-/ --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Desfile de los Locos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2018 at 17:41:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment That is pretty creepy. I don't like the angry man flipping the birds in an otherwise innocent walk, but that adds an emotional response and I guess emotion is what we are after here. Can you improve the categorization a bit? It's not precise nor accurate. --Trougnouf (talk) 00:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Trougnouf (talk) 16:32, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment - I will support once you fix the categories. Having this in the categories of "Parade" and "Parades" doesn't make sense, and why are those two different categories, anyway? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:30, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Having fixed the cats, I'll say that there is good chaos in this photo ... it brings out the craziness of the event. Daniel Case (talk) 14:51, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Yann (talk) 17:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 02:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Added to two wiki pages too. Jee 01:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Sputnik (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2018 (UTC) Multa perturbatio in hac pictura.
  • Could you please use a living language? This is a little irritating. :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pro me Britannica lingua irritabilis est. (For me English is irritating.)
  • Kamu boleh guna Bahasa Melayu. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --WQL (talk) 05:37, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Hieno näkymä merelle Seurasaaresta.png[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2018 at 15:44:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of an ocean from an island.
  • Forgotten: IMO PNG is not a good choice for photographs. --XRay talk 13:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Sunset at Ganga Sagar, Janakpurdham 11.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2018 at 13:38:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 13:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 13:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - Very atmospheric and nicely composed, so I'll support, but I think the reason people have so far not supported is that sunsets are specifically described as usually beautiful yet common, so people may be feeling that this photo may not be a special enough sunset to support but haven't been inclined to oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:45, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Conditional support Per Ikan, I see it as more of a mood than an attempt to represent what I consider to be dusk here (as we can't see the sun since it appears to have gone down). Some very minimal perspective correction is needed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Sputnik (talk) 11:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Nice sunset but these black silhouettes are not very interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Pitkä alikulku espoossa.png[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2018 at 09:33:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

long underpass in Finland
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by JKorpimies - uploaded by JKorpimies - nominated by JKorpimies -- JKorpimies (talk) 09:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- JKorpimies (talk) 09:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Regretful oppose It's a great idea and good composition, the kind of image you'd expect to see on a square meter of canvas at photo exhibitions, but unfortunately the focus has ended up on the tiles instead of the bike. That makes it a no-go for me, sorry. --Cart (talk) 09:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose as per cart Bijay Chaurasia (Talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - I find this a good composition and I don't find that having the bike be a little out of focus in the background makes it unworthy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support per Ikan. GerifalteDelSabana (talk) 11:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Experimental shot looking weird -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:17, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Hermione (ship, 2014), Sète 2018.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2018 at 07:38:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hermione (ship, 2014)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created - uploaded - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Despite the tents the atmosphere is very special and brings this picture out of the ordinary. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Some might complain about the tents but I like the old vs. new contrast and the very lovely tones. Quality is flawless as always. --Code (talk) 08:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support per Code -- Colin (talk) 08:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support The tents actually add to the image since they look exactly like the old military campaign tents of the original ship's era. They put the ship in context. In this dim light you can imagine what it looked like when the ship was made ready to sail for the American Revolution. --Cart (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support despite the tents. Storkk (talk) 11:14, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Sorry, but the angle doesn't work for me; it makes the image show too much of the harbour and not enough of the ship.--Peulle (talk) 11:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 12:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:41, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment - I'm still evaluating this photo, but please fix a dust spot that's some ways to the left of the upper right corner. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓  Done I cloned out not one but two dust-spots, let me know if yours is still here. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • No, you took care of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • On the photo: I love the ship and the harbor, but the bottom crop isn't working that smoothly for me and the right crop, with the one unsharp object in the lower right corner, is bugging me. I don't know what a photo that included more that is now below and to the right of the crops would have looked like, but I think I'd like this photo better if you did a horizontal crop right in front of the unsharp post, thereby also getting rid of a lot of the tents. The tents don't disturb me per se, but they kind of clog up a section of the photo. I think my proposed crop would create a more unified composition, but of course others might disagree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg  Neutral Light is just great, but considering the Hermione the main subject I think that the angle is not the best as a good portion of the subject is hidden behind the tents Poco2 19:31, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • The main subject is the whole scene, of course it is not the ship alone! I don't understand how can someone can think otherwise...! poor review, really. I will not be surprised if someone says the third window of the second boat is not under the right angle this is very disturbing!, and there is a big very very disturbing thing out of focus at bottom right, oh and so many boring tents!! where are the specialist of the oppose votes, there are many reasons here. Come one!! it is easy! Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support I was going to oppose based on the tents until I read Cart's !vote. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment I'm surprised that nobody talked about the title "File:Hermione (ship, 2014), Sète 2018.jpg" as we see only the back of the ship and it is only about 10% of the image. Nobody? and nobody oppose for the way the first tent is cut at bottom? and the "forbidden sign" at bottom? not disturbing? the second crane is misplaced too? no? isn't it? Sometimes FPC is not the research of the finest picture, but the competition of the poorest review. That is a snap shot, but a lucky one, that's all. Better for me to stop talking, please continue. Christian Ferrer (talk)
  • You have only yourself to blame for taking such nice photos with wow ambience that we just fall in love with them and forgive and forget all the little details. Face-smile.svg --Cart (talk) 21:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Tourist snapshot & POTY. -- Colin (talk) 21:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- King of ♠ 02:22, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose , at least for the right crop, because that unsharp post is not needed in the picture and distracts me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Jee 02:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Lopesan Baobab, Maspalomas, May 2018 -3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2018 at 18:41:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lopesan Baobab Resort, Maspalomas, Gran Canaria
  • No time for sitting idly by the pool if you hope to be first in line for dinner! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose This picture I can only review in comparison with the already promoted one, which I clearly prefer -- perhaps the dark building parts at both sides do the blue hour photo no favor, and I also prefer for this motif the more wide crop instead of a square photo. --A.Savin 13:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Why not? IMO it's better indeed and has more of the symmetry, though because of the dark parts I still wouldn't vote in support. --A.Savin 15:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose - I'm inordinately bugged by the asymmetry of the near right and left corners. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:20, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose The sky and the pool are nice, but the building and tree lights are too dark and too bright. Not saying it could have been taken/processed any better but the result isn't quite there compared to our best night FPs. -- Colin (talk) 07:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Alternative - uncropped[edit]

Lopesan Baobab, Maspalomas, May 2018 -2.jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info As suggested by A.Savin, also pinging Basotxerri, Frhdkazan, Cart, George Chernilevsky. While I do prefer the cropped square, I could understand arguments in favor of the uncropped wide-angle version --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg  Neutral as stated above. --A.Savin 17:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg  Neutral All that gradient light is competing with the patterns in this one and makes it restless. --Cart (talk) 17:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - This is IMO a better composition, and quite a nice one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:20, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Per other crop -- Colin (talk) 07:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support I still prefer this one because it contains the competition between gradients and patterns noted by Cart in her oppose !vote to that one. Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg  Support . A bit unsharp and overexposed in the middle, but very nice nonetheless. -- King of ♠ 02:22, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support I like this version better, it kind of adds more symetry into the image. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Llez (talk) 11:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Yann (talk) 22:48, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Jee 02:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support more completed from my perspective --WQL (talk) 05:39, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Red Clover 2011 G1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2018 at 16:01:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The red clover (Trifolium pratense). Ukraine
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - You really capture the beauty of this common flower. Any other remark from me would feel like unnecessary quibbling. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose good shot, but nothing all too special imho. It's a very commons plant, and the shot lacks in the wow-department for me, especially when compared to the already featured File:Trifolium_pratense_-_Keila2.jpg. --El Grafo (talk) 08:32, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose I think lighting could be significantly better. Actually, given the positions of the leaves, I think taking a half a step around the flower to your right would have stood a good chance of producing a more pleasing photo. Also per El Grafo. Storkk (talk) 09:33, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support If you have to upload something this small, this is the way to do it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Llez (talk) 11:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support per Ikan -- P999 (talk) 22:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Jee 02:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Soyuz rocket and spaceship V1-1.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2018 at 13:15:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Soyuz rocket and spaceship
  • Could you please add documentation sources? Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:44, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose still no information about the sources. Yann (talk) 22:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Yann (talk) 18:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Stercoraire iceland.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2018 at 22:43:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Aymen861 - uploaded by Aymen861 - nominated by Aymen861 -- Aymen861 (talk) 22:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Aymen861 (talk) 22:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Beautiful view but the front-right blurry rock kills it for me. The very bright one on the bottom-left isn't great either, and I would like to see some of the mountain range with a little bit more focus though that's technically nearly impossible. There is some red CA on the grass and the categorization is very imprecise. --Trougnouf (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment Great EV, if only you could put some more information and categories. Yann (talk) 13:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • I added Category:Stercorarius skua. I would support with geolocation, or at least the name of the mountain in the background. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Frhdkazan (talk) 06:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment I don't think the out of focus rocks or mountain is a problem... but the CA is disturbing. Would support if that was fixed. Storkk (talk) 11:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Nice! Tournasol7 (talk) 15:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose - It's a really interesting composition and great luck to find the eggs! But oppose per others, primarily for the unsharp foreground. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:13, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose per Ikan and Tougnouf. Great juxtaposition marred by technical shortcomings. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Water, Sand and Ice.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2018 at 19:50:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Glacier in Diamond Beach, Iceland
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Ice
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Natural phenomenon occurring in Iceland. Icebergs from the nearest mountain get detached and melt on the pitch-black, basalt lava sand. All by me -- Bharel (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Bharel (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment I like the idea. Reminds me (remotely) of this photo. However, the flare of the sun spoils the nomination for me. Not good enough to support, not bad enough to oppose. --Code (talk) 06:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
    Thanks Code for your review Face-smile.svg The flare was actually an artistic choice. I have a few other shots on different angles without the flare, but I chose this on purpose. (Much like another close image I've uploaded with an international glare File: Diamonds of nature.jpg) Bharel (talk) 10:05, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Regarding that file's name, please read Commons:File naming. Since people need to be able to search this huge archive to find the right photo, names must be accurate and not poetic or misleading. Only those looking for "natural diamonds" will find that file now, and they will be disappointed. --Cart (talk) 20:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
    ✓  Done , thanks cart Face-smile.svg Bharel (talk) 21:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Yann (talk) 13:03, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Looks like another one that could be an album cover. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
    Thanks mate :-) Bharel (talk) 12:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - Beautiful and striking, and this particular flare doesn't bother me, or not much. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:02, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose The colors seem saturated. Natural object that doesn't look natural. I suspect a strong post-processing. And also find the composition has a problem of cropping on top -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
    Thanks for your review Basile Face-smile.svg. There's not much post processing actually (tiny bit of mainly exposure correction on the water). The black sand creates a strong saturation difference. I am, however, able to desaturate it straight on the original raw file if you believe it'll be better. Bharel (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Perhaps just this exposure correction is enough to make the picture looking artificial. You can try to improve it, yes, though the glare on top with the wave cut too short are also bothering in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Fundación César Manrique - post.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2018 at 14:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Top of a post of a cordon, Fundación César Manrique, Tahiche, Lanzarote

File:Panorama vom Wachtküppel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2018 at 13:24:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view from the Wachtküppel in the Rhön Mountains
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Instructive panoramic view (360°) from the Wachtküppel in the Rhön Mountains. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 13:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Milseburg (talk) 13:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Storkk (talk) 18:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Llez (talk) 21:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 21:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Ermell (talk) 08:20, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Procedural oppose This image has been nominated for deletion as copyvio; we should wait until it's resolved before considering it as an FP.Symbol support vote.svg  Support Never mind; it turns out it was by one of INeverCry's socks and the account has been blocked indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support - Lots to see, and very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Sympecma paedisca 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2018 at 12:25:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Siberian winter damselfly
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Very nice as well as a very good execution. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:21, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Tozina (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Poco2 19:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose - I may be spoiled by the dragonfly pictures that have been nominated here by Charles, et al., but compare the resolution and contrast in the other current FP in Category:Sympecmatinae: File:Austrolestes cingulatus03.jpg. It's too small for FPC, nowadays. It was taken in 2006. And yet, it's a flat-out better photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support File resolution enough for me for such a small damselfly in natural. More resolution means, you need to approach it and cut the aperture and go for artificial lights (like me) or lift the ISO (as Charles). All have their own pros and cons. Jee 02:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Large Gautama Buddha statue in Buddha Park of Ravangla, Sikkim.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2018 at 17:27:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Large Gautama Buddha statue in Buddha Park of Ravangla, Sikkim - Front Telephoto Shot

--Trougnouf (talk) 17:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment The brightness of the statue has been increased by adding some localized adjustments. But as per histogram there are no over blown highlights. It is slightly on the bright side but with details intact. The slight bluish in forest I guess was a result of decreasing the global contrast in the image. - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose as previous comments Charles (talk) 20:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose An impressive photo, but unfortunately you have emphasized the blue colours --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment The blue colour has been dialed down a bit globally in the photo. Pl check - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 02:14, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support After improvement --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support good enough now, imo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:30, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment Looks good, but there's a strange loss of fine detail (visible in the grass and bushes at the bottom). Too much noise reduction? dllu (t,c) 06:29, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment - This is a really imposing image. I'll await your work to address dllu's points before I vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment - I re-processed the image from scratch this time with selective noise reduction and aimed at maintaining the overall incremental improvement on this image that I have been doing basis feedback from various reviewers over the last few weeks. I think I have been able to address the issue highlighted by dllu in the latest version. The updated image has already been uploaded. - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 17:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support chest detail is visible to the naked eye, less blue and less exaggerated colors, I approve. --Trougnouf (talk) 18:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Interesting subject, quite good for me. Yann (talk) 11:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg  Question statue appears to be leaning roughly 0.5° (counterclockwise from viewer's position)... does that reflect reality? Storkk (talk) 18:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment - The observation on tilt is correct (It was off by 0.53 deg). I have fixed it now and uploaded the updated photo. Thanks - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 02:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support seems fine now. dllu (t,c) 18:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support Poco2 19:42, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- WQL (talk) 05:40, 22 June 2018 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)