Commons:秀逸な画像の推薦

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
COM:FPC
This project page in other languages:
現在の候補へスキップ 現在の候補へスキップ 現在の除外候補へスキップ 現在の除外候補へスキップ

ここにある画像は秀逸な画像への候補画像です。 今日の一枚とは異なりますのでご注意ください。

概要[edit]

推薦にあたって[edit]

推薦者のためのガイドライン[edit]

まずはじめに、『秀逸な画像ガイドライン』、『画像のガイドライン』をお読みください。

ここでは推薦画像の評価を受ける・する際の必要事項を要約して紹介します。

  • 解像度 - 200万ピクセル以下の写真画像は、特別な理由が無い限り却下されます。1,600 x 1,200 ピクセル(1.92メガピクセル)は200万ピクセルには届いていない事にご注意ください。
コモンズに置かれた画像は一般的なPCモニターのみで閲覧されるとは限らず、プリントアウトや高解像度モニターで表示される可能性もあります。将来的にもどのような機器が用いられるようになるかは誰にも予想出来ないので、推薦画像が可能な限り高い解像度を保っている事は重要な事なのです。
  • スキャン画像 - 公式な方針ではありませんが、Help:スキャニングページで各種様々な画像を準備するための有用なアドバイスが提供されています。
  • フォーカス - 通常、重要な被写体は全て焦点が合っていなければいけません。
  • 前景と背景 - 前景や背景に主題ではない物が写り込むと、それは“余計なもの”になり得ます。前景にある物が主題の重要な部分を隠していないか、背景にあるものが構図を損ねていないか(例:後ろの街灯が人物の頭の上から生えているように見える、等)を確認しましょう。
  • 全体品質 - 推薦される画像には高い技術品質が要求されます。
  • デジタル補正 - 見る人を欺いてはいけません。写真画像のキズ・ホコリ等を修正する、良い編集、故意に人を騙す目的でない限り、デジタル補正は一般的に歓迎されます。例を挙げると、色合い/露出補正、シャープ/ボカシ、遠近感歪み補正、トリミング(切り取り)等がこれにあたります。背景に写り込んだ余計な物を取り除く等のさらに大がかりな修正は、{{Retouched picture}}テンプレートを画像ページへ貼付け、修正した旨を記述しましょう。記述漏れや記述ミスがある等、主題を不正確に見せる編集は決して受け入れられません。
  • 価値 - 『全ての画像の中でも特に際立ち、最も価値のある画像』が我々の大きな目標です。秀逸な画像はそれぞれの分野の中でも別格でなけらばならず、故に次の点に留意して下さい。
    • たいていの夕日は美しく見えますが、そういう画像のほとんどは他の夕日画像と大差ありません。
    • 夜景は美しいですが、普通は日中に撮影された写真の方がより詳細を見せてくれます。
    • 必ずしも『美しさに価値がある』わけではありません。

技術的側面では露出『構図』『動感表現』被写界深度等を見ます。

  • 露出とはシャッタースピードと絞りとの組み合わせの事を言い、適切なトーンカーブが見せる陰影〜ハイライトが有用なディティールを描写します。これをラティチュード(露光寛容度)と言い、このラティチュードの陰影〜ハイライトの領域内において、画像を暗め、中庸、明るめに作る事が出来ますが、デジタルカメラ及びデジタル画像はこのラティチュードの範囲がフィルムに比べて狭いです。ディティールの欠損した影部分は必ずしも「悪い」わけではなく、実際にその様な効果が望ましい場合(部分)もあります。ただしディティールの欠損したハイライト部分が大きく面積を占めるのは良くありません。
  • 構図とは画像画面内での各要素の配置の事を言います。“三分割法”は構図作成には良い方法で、美術学校でも教えられています。まず、画像に水平線と垂直線をそれぞれ2本引き、画像を水平・垂直方向とも3分割します。主題を中央に配置するとたいていは画面に面白味を欠き、水平線と垂直線が交差する4つの交点の内どれか1つに主題を置いた方が良い画面になるでしょう。地平線は画面を半分に切ってしまうので、通常は地平線を中央に配置するべきではありません。上寄り、若しくは下寄りに配置させる方が良いでしょう。主たる考え方としては空間を上手に使い、躍動感・臨場感のある画面を作るという事です。
  • 動感表現 - ここでは被写体の「動き」を表現する手法を紹介します。動きのある被写体は止まって見えるか、もしくはブレて写りますが、これらはどちらの方が良いとは必ずしも言えず、どのような表現意図を持っているかによります。「動感」は主題と共に写り込んでいる他の背景等との関係で表現されます。例えばレーシングカーの撮影。車と背景とが共に止まって見えては、見る側にスピード感は伝わってきません。 なので撮影手法によって車は画面内で止まっているように写り、かつ背景をブレさせることでスピード感が表現され、このような手法を「パンニング(流し撮り)」と呼びます。一方で、背景と共に止まって撮られた高く跳躍したバスケットボール選手は、これは決定的瞬間の「不自然」なポーズになり、これも良い写真になり得るでしょう。
  • 被写界深度(DOF)とは主題の前側から後ろ側までのフォーカスエリアの事を言います。被写界深度は全ての画像で明解な意図のもと選択され、深い、または浅い被写界深度は、画像に品質を与えもし、また損なわせもします。浅い被写界深度は、主題を他の被写体から切り離し、見せたい被写体に注目を集めることが出来ます。深い被写界深度は空間を強調させる事が出来ます。広角(短焦点)レンズは深い被写界深度、逆に望遠(長焦点)レンズは浅い被写界深度が得られる傾向があります。また絞りを絞り込むと被写界深度は深く、解放すると浅い被写界深度が得られます。

グラフィック要素では形状、ボリューム、色、テクスチャー、遠近感、バランス、比率 等を見ます。

  • 形状とは主題に対する輪郭線、及び形状を言います。
  • ボリュームとは主題の立体感に対する品質を言います。立体感は横からのライティングで表現出来、反対に正面からのライティングは被写体を平坦に見せる傾向があり、不向きとされています。自然光の中でベストな光を得るには、早朝か、もしくは夕方の日の光が良いでしょう。
  • は大変重要で、強すぎる色合いは好ましくありません。
  • テクスチャーとは主題の表面材質の描写性に於ける品質を言います。表面材質は横からのライティングにより強調され、手に触れて伝わるかのような質感を与えます。
  • 遠近感とは、画像の画面内若しくは外にある消失点で繋がる放射状の直線、これに沿った形で現れる「角度」により表現されます。
  • バランスでは画像の画面内での重心が左右均衡か、若しくは片方に寄る等適切な配置が成されているかを見ます。
  • 比率では画面の大きさに対する被写体の大きさを見ます。一般的に、小さな被写体は小さく写真に表現してしまう傾向にありますが、相応しい撮影手法により小さな被写体を実寸とは逆に大きく見せる事が可能です。例えば、小さな花を大きな山よりも大きく見る事が出来ます。この手法を指して「倒置法」と呼びます。
主題の全ての要素を画像に盛込む必要はありません。多くの写真はそれぞれの個性で評価出来ます。すなわち、画像の色やテクスチャー等々により判断出来ます。
  • 『象徴性か妥当性か』 ー 『秀逸な画像』ではしばしばこのようなテーマで意見論争が起こる傾向にあります。技術的・品質的には出来の悪い写真でも極めて撮影困難な被写体を捉えた写真は、凡庸な被写体を写した品質的に良い写真よりも評価されます。もちろん撮影困難な被写体を写し、かつ品質も良い写真は極めて価値の高い写真と言えます。
画像は時に撮影者と評価者、若しくはどちらか片方の文化的な偏りが見られます。画像の意図は画像そのものの文化的背景により評価されるべきであり、評価者の文化的背景に依存してはいけません。イメージは人に語りかけ、そして慈しみ、怒り、拒絶、幸せ、悲しみ等の感情を喚起させる力を持っています。良い写真から与えられる心地よさには限りがありません。


画像のガイドラインを事前に読めば、あなたの推薦が成就する可能性を最大限に引き伸ばしてくれるでしょう。

新規推薦[edit]

推薦に値する価値があると考えられる画像を作った、または見つけたならば、その画像に適切な説明ライセンスが与えられているかを確認し、以下に従ってください。

ステップ1:画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックス内の文字列の後にコピー&ペースト、正しく Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg と記入されているかを確認し、続いて『作品を推薦』ボタンをクリックします。


ステップ2:ページ編集画面上にある指示に従い必要箇所を付記、ページを保存してください。

ステップ3:ステップ2で作成したページへのリンクをFeatured picture candidates/candidate listへ手動で挿入します。ページ編集をクリックし、候補リスト最上部に以下の書式で推薦画像へのリンクを加えます。

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg}}

投票[edit]

投票には以下のテンプレートを使用します:

  • {{支持}}または{{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg SupportSymbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{反対}}または{{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeSymbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),
  • {{中立}}または{{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg NeutralSymbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{コメント}}または{{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentPictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • 情報:{{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • 質問:{{Question}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question).

テンプレート{{FPX|理由}}を用いて、推薦画像が秀逸な画像の推薦に相応しくない旨を指摘出来ます。テンプレートの「理由」部分に、秀逸な画像には明確に値しない事の説明を書き加えます(可能ならば英語で)。

あなたが何故その画像を好むか、または好まないか、特に(Symbol support vote.svg Supportや(Symbol oppose vote.svg Opposeの投票をする際は簡単な理由を加えましょう。また署名(~~~~)も忘れずに。匿名投票は受け付けられません。

秀逸な画像からの除外[edit]

時も経ればやがて『秀逸な画像』の基準も変わります。かつては“充分に価値に値する”と決定されたであろう画像も、その価値は普遍ではありません。ここでは「もはや『秀逸な画像』に値しない」と考えられる画像をリストアップします。リストされた画像へは、{{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep 及び {{維持}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (=『秀逸な画像』に値する)、または{{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist 及び {{除外}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose (=『秀逸な画像』に値しない)を投票します。

あなたが『秀逸な画像』の価値基準に値しないと考える画像があれば、除外候補として提出できます。除外したい画像の画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックスの文字列の後にコピー&ペーストします。


あなたが作成した新規除外候補のページに以下を加えます。

  • 画像の作者、投稿者等の出所情報。
  • その画像の“過去の秀逸な画像への推薦”ページへのリンク(画像ページの「リンク節」に表示されています)。
  • あなたが除外と考える理由とあなたの署名。

次に、Commons:Featured picture candidates/removalを編集し、下記の書式で作成した除外候補のページのリンクを手動で最上段に挿入します。

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:除外画像名.jpg}}

秀逸な画像の候補での方針[edit]

総則[edit]

  1. 投票期間を終えた後、結果は推薦日時から数えて10日後(下記タイムテーブル参照)に決定します。投票期間は推薦日時から数えて9日と23時間59分です。10日、またはそれを超えた投票はカウントされません。
  2. 匿名寄稿者による推薦を歓迎します。
  3. 匿名寄稿者による議論への参加を歓迎します。
  4. 匿名寄稿者による投票はカウントされません。
  5. 推薦者票は投票へはカウントされません。支持は明示的かつ言明される必要があります。
  6. 推薦者は自身の推薦をいつでも取り下げる事が出来ます。推薦を取り下げるには "I withdraw my nomination" (推薦を取り下げます)と書くか、テンプレート {{withdraw|~~~~}} を加えます。
  7. ウィキメディア・コモンズのプロジェクトの目的は、全てのウィキメディアプロジェクト(将来的なプロジェクト含む)に於いて自由に利用可能な画像を集積するセントラル・データベースを提供することである、ということを忘れないでください。セントラル・データベースは単純にウィキメディアの保管庫と言うわけではなく、また『秀逸な画像』等のプロジェクトに応じた判断をされるべきではありません。
  8. 推薦日から数えて5日間支持を受けられなかった画像(推薦者票含まず)は候補リストから外されます。(下記タイムテーブル参照)
  9. テンプレート{{FPX}}が貼られた画像は、テンプレート{{FPX}}の適用後は推薦者以外の支持票が無い限り、48時間後に候補リストから外されます。

秀逸と除外のルール[edit]

候補画像は下記必要事項に準じて秀逸な画像に認定されます。

  1. 適切なライセンス情報が添付されている。
  2. 最低5票以上の支持票を得ている。
  3. 支持:反対比率が2:1 (賛成が3分の2の過半数)以上である。
  4. 2つの同様な画像での異なったバージョンは同時に『秀逸な画像』へは認定されず、より支持票の多かった一枚を認定します。

除外ルールでは、投票期間、及びリストから外される期間は秀逸ルールと同じ期間を取ります。除外候補提出後5日間で提出者以外の Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose)票が得られなかった候補は、5日間ルールが適用され、候補リストから外されます。

常連ユーザーが推薦・投票の完了方法に従って、推薦投票を閉じることがあります。終了方法に関してはCommons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finishedを参照。

何よりも礼儀を忘れずに[edit]

どうか、あなたが評価するその画像が「人の作品」であることを忘れないでください。「これはヒドイ」、「こんなのキライだ」と言ったような表現は避けましょう。もしあなたが『反対』に票を投じなければならないのなら、思いやりを忘れずに。また、あなたの話す英語は、また誰か他の人の話す英語とは同じではないでしょう。慎重に言葉を選んでください。

それでは良い評価を。そして、全てのルールは壊すことが出来るという事を忘れないでください。

関連項目[edit]

目次[edit]

秀逸な画像の候補[edit]

purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Dülmen, Merfeld, Wildpferdebahn, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2020 -- 7340.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2020 at 04:54:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dülmen pony in the Merfeld Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Matterhorn and Riffelhorn as seen from Gornergrat, Wallis, Switzerland, 2012 August.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2020 at 00:07:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Chafer May 2020-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2020 at 22:50:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Summer Chafer

Covid-19 San Salvatore 06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2020 at 20:40:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

File:Wald-Kahlkopf (Psilocybe pelliculosa)-20191014-RM-112540.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2020 at 20:13:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Trekkers along with porters towards Snow Lake, over Biafo Glacier 61Km.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2020 at 18:38:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trekkers on their way towards Snow Lake, Karakoram, Pakistan.

File:Manneporte en soir.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2020 at 10:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cliffs of Étretat with natural arch Manneporte
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Normandy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cliffs of Étretat with natural arch Manneporte. Created by Jörg Braukmann - uploaded by Milseburg - nominated by Milseburg -- Milseburg (talk) 10:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 10:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Oh yes. --A.Savin 12:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very beautiful. The horizon is a bit wavy, see if you can do something about it. -- King of ♥ 15:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sonya7iv (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice composition, but sharpness could be better. There are halos at the rocks in the background and the horizon looks like a barrel. --XRay talk 18:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 19:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alsakan (talk) 22:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another lovely composition. In the past I sometimes opposed your nominations because I didn't see a clear composition, but I haven't had anything to complain about lately. Cmao20 (talk) 02:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like a straight horizon. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Capsicum - Mercado Municipal Funchal 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 16:31:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dried Capsicum, Mercado dos Lavradores, Funchal, Madeira

File:SL Horton Plains NP asv2020-01 img08.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 13:35:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Horton Plains landscape
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Sri Lanka
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Landscape in the Horton Plains National Park, Sri Lanka ----- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 13:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 13:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Quite common outdoor scene, doesn't seem very special to me. Overall quite a lot of uninteresting sky, too. --Basotxerri (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Normal landscape, not special enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose same. common, harsh light and all. - Benh (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, though the scenery is beautiful in its various elements. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry but per above. Good QI, but the composition is not as good as your usual standard at FP. Cmao20 (talk) 02:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Avenida Presidente Julio A. Roca y calle Bolívar1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 06:45:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Avenida Presidente Julio A. Roca y calle Bolívar

File:Equisetum telmateia Fallätsche drops 20200507.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 06:41:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Equisetum telmateia with dew in Fallätsche, Zurich
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Equisetaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There are three other FPs of Equisetaceae, but I think all of them are quite different from this one. This picture is more "natural", and I like the bushy form of the young plant as well as the dew droplets on it. --Domob (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Domob (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sonya7iv (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting grass and cluttered background -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Basile, there's room for improvement in terms of composition, DoF and wow-effect Poco a poco (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile -- Alsakan (talk) 22:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Nice plant, but could use more isolation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the dew droplets. Background could be better I agree, but it's FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Torre del silencio, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 60-64 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 21:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tower of Silence (also known as 'Dakhma'), old settlement nearby and city of Yazd, Iran.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Tower of Silence (also known as 'Dakhma'), old settlement nearby and city of Yazd, Iran. A Tower of Silence is a circular, raised structure built by Zoroastrians for excarnation – that is, for dead bodies to be exposed to carrion birds, usually vultures. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a great panorama, but it looks like it's strongly tilted downwards to the right to me. Happy to change my vote if this can be fixed, but it's pretty disconcerting as-is. Cmao20 (talk) 00:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    Cmao20: I uploaded a new version, hopefully I address your concern --Poco a poco (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks! Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Structures look vertical. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not tilted IMO --Llez (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's great to see another one of your beautiful panoramas of Iran. I particularly love the desert mountains in the haze on the right that look almost like mirages. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 01:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Lago del Rey, Alemania, 2019-05-17, DD 25.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 21:44:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cottage at Königssee, Germany.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cottage at Königssee, Germany. I enjoy the contrast of green forest and white mountains here with a nice cottage in between and the lake in the front. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cute composition. Shame about the top left corner, but no big deal on a 50 MP sensor. -- King of ♥ 22:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nomination and KoH. Quality is fine, one would barely notice the blurry corners on a 20mpx downsample. Cmao20 (talk) 00:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:42, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Frank. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Needs a bit of work on pincushion distortion (if that's the right description). The reflections in the water are a long way off vertical except in the centre. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    I adressed that, Charlesjsharp, among other adjustments --Poco a poco (talk) 13:39, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ahuR ☘ 10:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. I like the balance of the two mountains. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sonya7iv (talk) 13:10, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Appealing weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Too unsharp on the left side IMO --Llez (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per Llez.--Ermell (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 18:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:The Hive - Kew Gardens.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 16:34:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sonya7iv - uploaded by Sonya7iv - nominated by Sonya7iv -- Sonya7iv (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Sonya7iv (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Stunning composition. Please remove the purple fringing. -- King of ♥ 16:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks --Sonya7iv (talk) 17:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
    Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Still some fringing left, but no longer distracting. -- King of ♥ 22:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Purple fringing still present, there is also a grainy unsharpness especially in the lower edges, the whole picture seemms to be oversharpened to correct the unsharp edges. Would be a great photo without these issues. --Llez (talk) 17:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not technically perfect, but wow, what a composition! Cmao20 (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you add more detailed description, please? I am not sure what I am looking at... --Grtek (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 06:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ahuR ☘ 10:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Eye-catching. But short description -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 14:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it's a stunning picture, but I'm going to oppose because you have been on an oversharpened photos streak IMO. Almost all of your pictures I have looked full size show annoying artifacts. I feel that one wasn't that sharp to begin with and that you have hopelessly try to fix (ruining it IMO). - Benh (talk) 18:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • sincerely thank you for your suggestions. I will try to improve myself --Sonya7iv (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I believe I do see what Benh is talking about, but I just can't hold back from supporting such a great composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan Kekek. --Cayambe (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO JPEG artifacts, but really good composition. --XRay talk 18:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Front court of Wartburg Castle (4).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 12:43:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Front court of Wartburg Castle in Eisenach, Eisenach, Germany

File:Luther church in Apolda 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 12:40:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Luther church in Apolda, Thuringia, Germany

File:Iglesia Nova Gracanica, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 23:31:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:FelipeHeredia (retouched).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 13:00:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Felipe Heredia, former governor of Salta Province, Argentina

File:Golden Pheasants by John Henry Hintermeister.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 03:40:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden Pheasants, a 1938 painting by John Henry Hintermeister. The digital image shows the painting as it exists today, including multiple signatures, added to make sure a signature was visible in lithographed calendar prints that were cropped from the original. Spots may be seen on the painting, which exist on the original.

File:Oenopia lyncea3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 06:36:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oenopia lyncea
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I agree completely with Llez. What kind of plant is that, and are all the white things larvae, worms or part of the plant? Is there any way to find out? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - It's clear that the beetle is on the leaf. What's not clear is what plant it is or what all the white stuff is. Those things need to be explained, or I feel like I should oppose for lack of sufficient information, in spite of being very impressed by the photo. Maybe the author can explain what we're looking at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • No, put the information in the description or get the author to do so, so that people know what they're looking at! This isn't about me, and I'm not the only one who's finding the description inadequate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but the reflections/flare on the animal are the main reason for my oppose. Also per Liez and Ikan Kekek. --Cayambe (talk) 11:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Egretta garzetta in the United Kingdom.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 21:33:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Egretta garzetta in the United Kingdom
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family :Ardeidae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sonya7iv - uploaded by Sonya7iv - nominated by Sonya7iv -- Sonya7iv (talk) 21:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Sonya7iv (talk) 21:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. This is a hard one for me because it is a clearer, more illustrative image than any of the other four FPs we have (1 2 3 4) but the quality just isn't up to snuff, especially when compared to 2. I think a lot of the noise in the background is from oversharpening, because the D750 really shouldn't be that bad at ISO 400. -- King of ♥ 22:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but this one is definitely oversharpened for me. I like it and I think it could be FP, but the oversharpening is IMO pretty glaring at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I have to agree with the others. Very clear oversharpening, particularly on and for some ways below the bird's head. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 15:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Sociable weaver (Philetairus socius).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 20:43:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sociable weaver (Philetairus socius)

File:Hortus Haren. 06-05-2020 (d.j.b.) 06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 15:44:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Lamprotornis superbus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 11:50:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lamprotornis superbus (Rüppell, 1845)(Superb starling), Karlsruhe Zoo
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Note that there is some color noise in the background which should be easy to clean up with minimal degradation in image quality. -- King of ♥ 16:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Llez (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Sorry, I take it back, I wasn't aware that it was taken in a tropical hall Poco a poco (talk) 20:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very harsh flash and annoying shadow. - Benh (talk) 20:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 05:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Beautiful bird but the flash ruins it. I agree with Benh -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seems fine to me, it's a very beautiful bird. Cmao20 (talk) 23:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh - Ryan Hodnett (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think we should need a flash for this bird in a zoo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Why Not? Light coonditions in a Zoo are sometimes more difficult than in nature. This bird was photographed indoor in the "Exotic hall" which was very dark compared with outside. --Llez (talk) 20:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK, I understand, but am surprised that a bird gets no daylight in a zoo. They do in London Zoo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I didn't say "no daylight", but in a room it is always darker, please see here. The birds fly free, but the light conditions are not optimal --Llez (talk) 05:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh. Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 18:02:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White circles 10 feet (3.0 m) in diameter, spaced 8 feet (2.4 m) apart, are painted on the grass at Dolores Park in San Francisco to encourage social distancing during Memorial Day weekend amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Christopher Michel - uploaded by Tm - nominated by Mxn -- Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just as striking and educational as the photo from May 23 but higher-quality. Though the grass has gotten a little worn by Memorial Day, it shows more of the circles and a larger crowd has come out to use them. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 18:08, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 20:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I would support if it was taken legally and the CC licence etc. is OK. Is it illegal to fly a drone in a San Francisco park? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp: The photo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license, which is acceptable for this project. As for whether the photographer broke any rules, I can't say for certain. The Recreation & Parks Department doesn't allow drones to take off or land at city parks without permission, but Dolores Park isn't in an FAA no-drone zone. [1][2][3] The photographer hasn't indicated whether the drone took off from Dolores Park or from somewhere else nearby for this particular photo, or whether they got permission to take off at the park. (Some other photos were taken a good distance away from the park.) – Minh Nguyễn 💬 23:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Neptuul (talk) 21:24, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yeah, this one definitely. --A.Savin 23:10, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice thumbnail, unfortunately at full size blown highlights everywhere, in every single white part. Technically not well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes, a nice illustration of the Quarantine period, but otherwise per Basile Morin. --Cayambe (talk) 05:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support idea & compo clearly outweigh minor technical issues --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wow.--Grtek (talk) 10:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile Morin. --Karelj (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --Ivar (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strong compo, quality is improvable but still ok to me give the wow factor Poco a poco (talk) 18:10, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Benh (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others -- Alsakan (talk) 02:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Martin. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile. A VI in all likelihood, but we can only forgive the technical failings of drones so much. Daniel Case (talk) 23:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I find this compelling. Support per Martin, et al. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 18:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but would not be opposed to replacing if we get a similar shot that addresses the technical issues. it's too interesting and visually compelling not to feature in some way, though. — Rhododendrites talk |  00:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Cologne Germany Cologne-Gay-Pride-2015 Parade-06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 12:07:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cologne, Germany: Drag queen "Tatjana Taft" at Cologne Pride Parade 2015
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Cccefalon - uploaded by Cccefalon - nominated by Persia -- PERSIA♠ 12:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PERSIA♠ 12:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's definitely a nice and interesting portrait but it lacks some wow due to the poor lightning and DoF IMO. --T.Bednarz (talk) 16:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting background. --Palauenc05 (talk) 05:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely woman and colors --Wilfredor (talk) 12:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:03, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A different subject for FP, but I don't like the composition so much, with the blurry wires and the out-of-focus camera in the background. Cmao20 (talk) 00:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per above --Andrei (talk) 14:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 23:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination--ahuR ☘ 09:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Garden warbler (Sylvia borin) at the UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Swabian Alb.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 12:12:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Swabian Alb is a fascinating place to listen and, if lucky enough, watch birds such as the Eurasian skylark and others. This Garden Warbler was spied singing his beautiful spring anthem in an almost blooming Hawthorn Crataegus monogyna. UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Swabian Alb.

File:Dolina Chochołowska i tatrzańskie krokusy.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 10:13:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tatra National Park
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Qvidemus - uploaded by Qvidemus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, I like this. I can see others opposing because of the blurry foreground though. I don't mind the blown-out areas, it seems to me that in a very bright sunny photo the highlights kind of should be dazzlingly bright. Overall this is a dreamlike composition and it really works. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice mood and some beautiful light effects. --Bob Collowan (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Apart fromt the tilt I see a nice scene with moderate wow effect, disturbing elements (like left crop, shadow on right) and some overexposed areas, overall not a FP to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco a poco. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco, but I also find it overly busy compositionally (maybe something focusing more on just the hut and the trees behind it) and harshly lit on the right. Daniel Case (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - It's nice, but it's so bright that I can't see details in any of the flowers on the ground, and I want to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Masked Lapwing - Newington.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 05:00:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Masked Lapwing
  • @Frank Schulenburg: Did You look at shooting time? It was early in the morning, when light conditions were soft and warm. --Ivar (talk) 10:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice-looking bird. -- King of ♥ 05:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 11:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice motif but a bit small and the blurry area at the bottom is too dominant Poco a poco (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Poco --Andrei (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I feel like that amount of blurred area damages the composition enough for it not to be an FP. It looks like I'll be outvoted, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes, and I've not had a response to the question I asked. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Pfersag-Wasserfall-20200308-RM-113024.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 21:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pfersag waterfall in the district of Lichtenfels in Upper Franconia
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Waterfall in the district of Lichtenfels in Upper Franconia. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very beautiful, but framing could be slightly better: crop out a bit on the left, give a bit more breathing room at the top. -- King of ♥ 22:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very high resolution but the light is not very attractive, and the composition not well balanced (crop at the top too tight) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Basile. I wasn't sure about this and I nearly supported it because of the great resolution, but I don't like the light, it's too dull for me and doesn't stand out from other FP waterfalls. I also think the detail looks a little bit odd at full size, hard to explain it though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above, and the amount of water is a bit limited, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, and pleasant to look at at full size as well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Nové Mlýny Reservoir - Dam 2020 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 20:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dam of Nové Mlýny reservoir cascade
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Czech Republic
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The exact gallery for the Czech Republic doesn't yet exist. Not sure about the right procedure. --T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Light is maybe not the best but I like the composition and the reflection. Wouldn't worry about specifying a gallery that doesn't exist yet, I've done that before. Cmao20 (talk) 22:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dull light, ordinary image -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's fine, but lacking in wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 07:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile -- Alsakan (talk) 16:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile, also rather cluttered compositionally. Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I disagree with some of you, in that I think this is a good composition and the clouds really help. However, the sharpness isn't overwhelming and I'd love a little more light to shine on the dam. I think this is a good motif and a strong QI and near-FP photo, and it's worth trying to shoot this scene in different lights and weather conditions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Stadtquartier Overbergplatz -- 2020 -- 7378 (bw).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 17:14:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

StadtQuartier Overbergplatz, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 17:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 17:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support perspective and special. Black / white gives me an extra dimension.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Famberhorst. Cmao20 (talk) 22:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the tilt, nor the crop at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile.--Peulle (talk) 07:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I couldn't find anything spectacular enough to get this image featured. Although the cloud gap with the rooftops is an interesting idea, it doesn't work for me overall. --T.Bednarz (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the composition is not for me --Andrei (talk) 14:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

File:SL Galle Fort asv2020-01 img24.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 15:05:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Galle Lighthouse

File:Klagenfurt Innere Stadt Theaterplatz 4 Stadttheater SW-Ansicht 18052020 9029.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 14:36:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Klagenfurt Innere Stadt Theaterplatz

File:Durmitor mountains, Montenegro.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 11:13:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Montenegro
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition and for once I think the shadows really add to it, they give the landscape depth somehow. Maybe the resolution is a bit low for FP though. Cmao20 (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per above. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Could you add the location? -- -donald- (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    done --Pudelek (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is not "extraordinary enough to be FP" for me. It is highly subjective. I have seen a lots of mountainous landscapes in my life and this one is just too ordinary for me (although defínitelly nice and well done.) --Grtek (talk) 10:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Grtek Poco a poco (talk) 18:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sort of per Grtek, but if the sharpness at full size hadn't struck me as underwhelming, I might have supported. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Three-course meal including Bistecca alla fiorentina (Bistec a la fiorentina).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 17:41:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Andrei (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crops don't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I take Charles' point but it looks so tasty I can't oppose, especially when you have presented it to us with such high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 00:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is a nice, moody image and the crop is OK for me, too. However the flaw I see is that according to the image title, the scene is about the meat which isn't in focus while focus is set on the secondary elements like bread and the cheese. --Basotxerri (talk) 08:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

*Symbol support vote.svg Support The focus should have been on the lemons, then the roast would certainly have been a bit sharper. But it is still good.--Ermell (talk) 09:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with T.Bednarz.--Ermell (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well, according to Wikipedia, it shouldn't be served with lemon. All the bread etc. has nothing to do with the dish (Bistecca alla fiorentina), which is (as pointed out above) blurred. My view, as written previously Cmao20, is that high resolution should not be a major factor to be considered here. High resolution for panoramas, church interiors, macro insects etc. are essential so you can zoom in on the details. High resolution of an out-of-focus image surely doesn't add any value, does it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose According to the title “Bistecca alla Fiorentina” the meat has to be in the center of the picture and not cheese and bread, which are not elements of a real Fiorentina dish.--Christof46 (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Tomascastelazo, I fixed the gallery and categories for you on this since you still seems to have some trouble with that. Do you want me to re-name and move this file to: "Three-course meal including Bistecca alla fiorentina (Bistec a la fiorentina).jpg"? I think that would make this nomination go better. --Cart (talk) 18:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Cart lol! I am useless in categorizing!!! I woul really appreciate you doing what you suggest!!! Keep safe and many thanks!!! Tomascastelazo (talk)
  • Ok, will fix. Stay safe, you too! --Cart (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Please Cart ping those who voted in favour of the previous description, not just the oppose voters. Let's have balance. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Charlesjsharp, I pinged those who had voiced some problem with the name or the context of it, otherwise I would've pinged opposer T.Bednarz in that post too. But as per your request I'm pinging everybody else now, I hope that is satisfactory for you. Pinging Cmao20, Andrei, Ermell. --Cart (talk) 21:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • simply changing the wording of the title makes me confused, what is the message of the picture?--Christof46 (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Though the enormous resolution, I am not a fan of this image. Considering it as a studio shot, I'd prefer not to have the cropped parts of the image, like the plate or the lemon slices, displayed in it at all. I'm also not impressed by the focus, since the main part of the dish is blurred as mentioned above. However, the piece of blue tapestry in the background looks also quite redundant to me. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 18:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- My criterium when looking at pictures of food is, does it make me hungry? This picture does. MartinD (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per T.Bednarz. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support "Bread and Cheese to be eaten after having a nice Bistecca". OK, then. And per MartinD. --Basotxerri (talk) 13:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. Also, the foods are not appealing enough for me. -- Alsakan (talk) 18:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The whole table to me looks too arranged for a real-life situation but too chaotic for a studio setup. It feels like ist was arranged hastily ("before you all dig in, let's push it all together so we can take a picture"), and that doesn't work. The crumpled corner of the red tapestry plays a big part in that. As it is now, the three slices of bread are the visual focal point of the image in terms of location, sharpness, lighting and exposure – but not in a way that would make them the star of the image, as all the other dished look much more interesting from a culinary POV. --El Grafo (talk) 11:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just too cluttered compositionally. Less would definitely have been more here. Daniel Case (talk) 00:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfavorable crop.--Milseburg (talk) 10:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. It all looks delicious, but I think it would have been better compositionally to focus on a subset of these items and not crop anything. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:View from Stolová hora to the north in the morning.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 16:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:20180819 ReuttenerSeilbahn vorZugspitze blau DSC00935 PtrQs.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 12:50:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Cableways
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by PtrQs - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice minimalistic composition. -- Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mimihitam (talk) 14:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing spectacular here. Seven Pandas (talk) 14:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good quality but I incline to agree with Seven Pandas. It's all a bit empty for me, there's not much tension in the composition. Cmao20 (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Subject in the shadow -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As this picture is generated from a raw file there is almost no limit to highlighting, but a) the gondola is coated by tinted glass, and b) artificially minimizing the constrast would mean to destroy the monochromatic blueish look by flashy red colors. --PtrQs (talk) 23:44, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm not saying you can save this nomination with a better post-processing, unfortunately, this gondola is very dark and thus uninteresting in my view (like this one) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 11:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 03:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the overall effect very much. I don't think it's a problem that the gondola is darker than the background -- which is the real subject. — Rhododendrites talk |  04:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support love the overall effect, gondola is not the object here, but the background with its lovely shades of blue. Renata3 (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The odd position and lighting on the gondola may have been intentional, but it doesn't work fo me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:08, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing stands out to warrant FP. -- Alsakan (talk) 18:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I could see this working as a horizontal ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This composition just does not work on a computer screen. I really dislike it especially in full screen mode. But looking at the thumb on the nomination page made me realize: It needs to be printed large, hung on an otherwise empty white wall and looked at from a distance of at least 3 meters. Perfect for waiting rooms or for relaxing your eyes in the office. Stare at it and get lost in your thoughts. The gondola could be a plain black silhouette and it wouldn't matter. It is not what you're looking at, it's only there to provide an additional layer of depth – and because of that it is positioned exactly where it needs to be. --El Grafo (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support El Grafo's idea finally convinced me. --T.Bednarz (talk) 10:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support how to take great shot in the day of bad atmospheric conditions. --Grtek (talk) 10:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:00, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 13:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I was going to oppose, but I looked at the full-page image from about 1.5 and then 1.7 or so meters, and I see more depth in it from there. I think I'll abstain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Zitting cisticola feeding its chicks.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 12:22:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • I am talking about halos Cart, not stripes. There is a band of lighter colour surrounding each stem about half the width of the stem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:16, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 03:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  04:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Budi Santoso Adji, Mimihitam, W.carter, Cmao20, King of Hearts, Basile Morin, Palauenc05, Ermell, Meiræ, Rhododendrites: I have already asked for the image quality to be improved, but the photographer is not active here. There is a weakness in third parties nominating images where they have no control over the image they are nominating. We all make mistakes, but nominators should try to verify the accuracy of the subject description before nomination. The birds in this image are incorrectly identified. There are two cisticolas in Indonesia. This is the golden-headed cisticola (Cisticola exilis). Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:49, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp thank you for pointing this out. Shall I change the name of the file then? Mimihitam (talk) 23:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    I would not be happy if someone changed the file name of any of my images. This is for the photographer only who may challenge my id if they wisħ. This is an obvious error and my id in this instance Basile Morin has been validated by one of Asia's top bird experts after I first checked in one of his field guides, but many identifications of LBJs (Little Brown Jobs) are challenging and third parties should in general not correct identifications. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • These two species are very similar. For me the wow is about the situation (not the kind of spectacle you see every day). However, it's important yes that the animals are well identified. It might be fixable. Personally, I can't distinguish both (perhaps a species feeding another one ? 🐥😉) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:38, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • @Charlesjsharp: the guidelines allow you to request the renaming of a file. Commons:File renaming#Which files should be renamed? Reason 3: To correct obvious errors in filenames, including misspelled proper nouns, incorrect dates, and misidentified objects or organisms. If you're absolutely sure the species is different, then just rename the file, what's the problem? If you're not sure, then maybe the photographer was right, and all is fine for us. As you can see yesterday I updated the description based on this discussion. I think this way the readers can judge and evaluate fairly what they're looking at. Finding the exact species is sometimes difficult, even for experts. A FP of mine won the 1st prize of WLS France although the species has always been unsure (I contacted high experts for precise identification, but they could not be 100% affirmative). Thus I think a margin of uncertainty is tolerated here. Most of us are photographers, not biologists. As I said above, this image is striking because three juvenile birds are fed by a parent, a rare thing in picture. And to be honest, I don't really care about the exact species, I attach much more importance to the behavior. Zitting cisticola and Cisticola exilis on Google are so similar, frankly it is not a drama. Hope this answers your question. -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
@Charlesjsharp: I must support Basile Morin's statement. Being a historian of literature, I don't know much about ornithology, hence, I must trust the uploader and/or the nominator. If you can attribute the birds more exactly, I would encourage you to change the file name and the description accordingly. The alternative would be that only ornithologists could evaluate such pictures. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, and please change the name and description accordingly with an appropriate edit summary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Fin garden ceiling2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 11:45:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

a part of qajar vault in fin garden, kashan, iran

File:Juvenile robin (12336).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 01:37:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a fledgling American robin

Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Turdidae_(Thrushes)

File:Home made sour dough bread.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 00:28:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Bread


秀逸除外候補[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Dülmen, Merfeld, Wildpferdebahn, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2020 -- 7340.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2020 at 04:54:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dülmen pony in the Merfeld Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Matterhorn and Riffelhorn as seen from Gornergrat, Wallis, Switzerland, 2012 August.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2020 at 00:07:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Chafer May 2020-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2020 at 22:50:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Summer Chafer

Covid-19 San Salvatore 06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2020 at 20:40:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

File:Wald-Kahlkopf (Psilocybe pelliculosa)-20191014-RM-112540.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2020 at 20:13:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Trekkers along with porters towards Snow Lake, over Biafo Glacier 61Km.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2020 at 18:38:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Trekkers on their way towards Snow Lake, Karakoram, Pakistan.

File:Manneporte en soir.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2020 at 10:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cliffs of Étretat with natural arch Manneporte
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Normandy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cliffs of Étretat with natural arch Manneporte. Created by Jörg Braukmann - uploaded by Milseburg - nominated by Milseburg -- Milseburg (talk) 10:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 10:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Oh yes. --A.Savin 12:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very beautiful. The horizon is a bit wavy, see if you can do something about it. -- King of ♥ 15:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sonya7iv (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice composition, but sharpness could be better. There are halos at the rocks in the background and the horizon looks like a barrel. --XRay talk 18:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 19:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alsakan (talk) 22:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Another lovely composition. In the past I sometimes opposed your nominations because I didn't see a clear composition, but I haven't had anything to complain about lately. Cmao20 (talk) 02:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like a straight horizon. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Capsicum - Mercado Municipal Funchal 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 16:31:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dried Capsicum, Mercado dos Lavradores, Funchal, Madeira

File:SL Horton Plains NP asv2020-01 img08.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 13:35:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Horton Plains landscape
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Sri Lanka
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Landscape in the Horton Plains National Park, Sri Lanka ----- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 13:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 13:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Quite common outdoor scene, doesn't seem very special to me. Overall quite a lot of uninteresting sky, too. --Basotxerri (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Normal landscape, not special enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose same. common, harsh light and all. - Benh (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, though the scenery is beautiful in its various elements. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry but per above. Good QI, but the composition is not as good as your usual standard at FP. Cmao20 (talk) 02:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Avenida Presidente Julio A. Roca y calle Bolívar1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 06:45:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Avenida Presidente Julio A. Roca y calle Bolívar

File:Equisetum telmateia Fallätsche drops 20200507.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 06:41:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Equisetum telmateia with dew in Fallätsche, Zurich
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Equisetaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There are three other FPs of Equisetaceae, but I think all of them are quite different from this one. This picture is more "natural", and I like the bushy form of the young plant as well as the dew droplets on it. --Domob (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Domob (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sonya7iv (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting grass and cluttered background -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Basile, there's room for improvement in terms of composition, DoF and wow-effect Poco a poco (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile -- Alsakan (talk) 22:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Nice plant, but could use more isolation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the dew droplets. Background could be better I agree, but it's FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Torre del silencio, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 60-64 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 21:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tower of Silence (also known as 'Dakhma'), old settlement nearby and city of Yazd, Iran.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Tower of Silence (also known as 'Dakhma'), old settlement nearby and city of Yazd, Iran. A Tower of Silence is a circular, raised structure built by Zoroastrians for excarnation – that is, for dead bodies to be exposed to carrion birds, usually vultures. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a great panorama, but it looks like it's strongly tilted downwards to the right to me. Happy to change my vote if this can be fixed, but it's pretty disconcerting as-is. Cmao20 (talk) 00:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    Cmao20: I uploaded a new version, hopefully I address your concern --Poco a poco (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks! Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Structures look vertical. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not tilted IMO --Llez (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's great to see another one of your beautiful panoramas of Iran. I particularly love the desert mountains in the haze on the right that look almost like mirages. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 01:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Lago del Rey, Alemania, 2019-05-17, DD 25.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 21:44:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cottage at Königssee, Germany.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cottage at Königssee, Germany. I enjoy the contrast of green forest and white mountains here with a nice cottage in between and the lake in the front. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cute composition. Shame about the top left corner, but no big deal on a 50 MP sensor. -- King of ♥ 22:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nomination and KoH. Quality is fine, one would barely notice the blurry corners on a 20mpx downsample. Cmao20 (talk) 00:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:42, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Frank. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Needs a bit of work on pincushion distortion (if that's the right description). The reflections in the water are a long way off vertical except in the centre. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    I adressed that, Charlesjsharp, among other adjustments --Poco a poco (talk) 13:39, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ahuR ☘ 10:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. I like the balance of the two mountains. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sonya7iv (talk) 13:10, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Appealing weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Too unsharp on the left side IMO --Llez (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per Llez.--Ermell (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 18:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:The Hive - Kew Gardens.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 16:34:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sonya7iv - uploaded by Sonya7iv - nominated by Sonya7iv -- Sonya7iv (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Sonya7iv (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Stunning composition. Please remove the purple fringing. -- King of ♥ 16:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks --Sonya7iv (talk) 17:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
    Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Still some fringing left, but no longer distracting. -- King of ♥ 22:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Purple fringing still present, there is also a grainy unsharpness especially in the lower edges, the whole picture seemms to be oversharpened to correct the unsharp edges. Would be a great photo without these issues. --Llez (talk) 17:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not technically perfect, but wow, what a composition! Cmao20 (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you add more detailed description, please? I am not sure what I am looking at... --Grtek (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 06:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ahuR ☘ 10:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Eye-catching. But short description -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 14:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it's a stunning picture, but I'm going to oppose because you have been on an oversharpened photos streak IMO. Almost all of your pictures I have looked full size show annoying artifacts. I feel that one wasn't that sharp to begin with and that you have hopelessly try to fix (ruining it IMO). - Benh (talk) 18:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • sincerely thank you for your suggestions. I will try to improve myself --Sonya7iv (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I believe I do see what Benh is talking about, but I just can't hold back from supporting such a great composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan Kekek. --Cayambe (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO JPEG artifacts, but really good composition. --XRay talk 18:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Front court of Wartburg Castle (4).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 12:43:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Front court of Wartburg Castle in Eisenach, Eisenach, Germany

File:Luther church in Apolda 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 12:40:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Luther church in Apolda, Thuringia, Germany

File:Iglesia Nova Gracanica, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 23:31:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:FelipeHeredia (retouched).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 13:00:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Felipe Heredia, former governor of Salta Province, Argentina

File:Golden Pheasants by John Henry Hintermeister.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 03:40:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden Pheasants, a 1938 painting by John Henry Hintermeister. The digital image shows the painting as it exists today, including multiple signatures, added to make sure a signature was visible in lithographed calendar prints that were cropped from the original. Spots may be seen on the painting, which exist on the original.

File:Oenopia lyncea3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 06:36:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oenopia lyncea
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I agree completely with Llez. What kind of plant is that, and are all the white things larvae, worms or part of the plant? Is there any way to find out? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - It's clear that the beetle is on the leaf. What's not clear is what plant it is or what all the white stuff is. Those things need to be explained, or I feel like I should oppose for lack of sufficient information, in spite of being very impressed by the photo. Maybe the author can explain what we're looking at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • No, put the information in the description or get the author to do so, so that people know what they're looking at! This isn't about me, and I'm not the only one who's finding the description inadequate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but the reflections/flare on the animal are the main reason for my oppose. Also per Liez and Ikan Kekek. --Cayambe (talk) 11:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Egretta garzetta in the United Kingdom.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 21:33:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Egretta garzetta in the United Kingdom
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family :Ardeidae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sonya7iv - uploaded by Sonya7iv - nominated by Sonya7iv -- Sonya7iv (talk) 21:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Sonya7iv (talk) 21:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. This is a hard one for me because it is a clearer, more illustrative image than any of the other four FPs we have (1 2 3 4) but the quality just isn't up to snuff, especially when compared to 2. I think a lot of the noise in the background is from oversharpening, because the D750 really shouldn't be that bad at ISO 400. -- King of ♥ 22:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but this one is definitely oversharpened for me. I like it and I think it could be FP, but the oversharpening is IMO pretty glaring at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I have to agree with the others. Very clear oversharpening, particularly on and for some ways below the bird's head. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 15:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Sociable weaver (Philetairus socius).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 20:43:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sociable weaver (Philetairus socius)

File:Hortus Haren. 06-05-2020 (d.j.b.) 06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 15:44:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Lamprotornis superbus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 11:50:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lamprotornis superbus (Rüppell, 1845)(Superb starling), Karlsruhe Zoo
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Note that there is some color noise in the background which should be easy to clean up with minimal degradation in image quality. -- King of ♥ 16:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Llez (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Sorry, I take it back, I wasn't aware that it was taken in a tropical hall Poco a poco (talk) 20:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very harsh flash and annoying shadow. - Benh (talk) 20:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 05:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Beautiful bird but the flash ruins it. I agree with Benh -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seems fine to me, it's a very beautiful bird. Cmao20 (talk) 23:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh - Ryan Hodnett (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think we should need a flash for this bird in a zoo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Why Not? Light coonditions in a Zoo are sometimes more difficult than in nature. This bird was photographed indoor in the "Exotic hall" which was very dark compared with outside. --Llez (talk) 20:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK, I understand, but am surprised that a bird gets no daylight in a zoo. They do in London Zoo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I didn't say "no daylight", but in a room it is always darker, please see here. The birds fly free, but the light conditions are not optimal --Llez (talk) 05:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh. Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 18:02:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White circles 10 feet (3.0 m) in diameter, spaced 8 feet (2.4 m) apart, are painted on the grass at Dolores Park in San Francisco to encourage social distancing during Memorial Day weekend amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Christopher Michel - uploaded by Tm - nominated by Mxn -- Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just as striking and educational as the photo from May 23 but higher-quality. Though the grass has gotten a little worn by Memorial Day, it shows more of the circles and a larger crowd has come out to use them. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 18:08, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 20:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I would support if it was taken legally and the CC licence etc. is OK. Is it illegal to fly a drone in a San Francisco park? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp: The photo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license, which is acceptable for this project. As for whether the photographer broke any rules, I can't say for certain. The Recreation & Parks Department doesn't allow drones to take off or land at city parks without permission, but Dolores Park isn't in an FAA no-drone zone. [4][5][6] The photographer hasn't indicated whether the drone took off from Dolores Park or from somewhere else nearby for this particular photo, or whether they got permission to take off at the park. (Some other photos were taken a good distance away from the park.) – Minh Nguyễn 💬 23:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Neptuul (talk) 21:24, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yeah, this one definitely. --A.Savin 23:10, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice thumbnail, unfortunately at full size blown highlights everywhere, in every single white part. Technically not well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes, a nice illustration of the Quarantine period, but otherwise per Basile Morin. --Cayambe (talk) 05:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support idea & compo clearly outweigh minor technical issues --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wow.--Grtek (talk) 10:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile Morin. --Karelj (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --Ivar (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strong compo, quality is improvable but still ok to me give the wow factor Poco a poco (talk) 18:10, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Benh (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others -- Alsakan (talk) 02:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Martin. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile. A VI in all likelihood, but we can only forgive the technical failings of drones so much. Daniel Case (talk) 23:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I find this compelling. Support per Martin, et al. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 18:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but would not be opposed to replacing if we get a similar shot that addresses the technical issues. it's too interesting and visually compelling not to feature in some way, though. — Rhododendrites talk |  00:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Cologne Germany Cologne-Gay-Pride-2015 Parade-06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 12:07:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cologne, Germany: Drag queen "Tatjana Taft" at Cologne Pride Parade 2015
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Cccefalon - uploaded by Cccefalon - nominated by Persia -- PERSIA♠ 12:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PERSIA♠ 12:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's definitely a nice and interesting portrait but it lacks some wow due to the poor lightning and DoF IMO. --T.Bednarz (talk) 16:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting background. --Palauenc05 (talk) 05:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely woman and colors --Wilfredor (talk) 12:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:03, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A different subject for FP, but I don't like the composition so much, with the blurry wires and the out-of-focus camera in the background. Cmao20 (talk) 00:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per above --Andrei (talk) 14:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 23:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination--ahuR ☘ 09:39, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Garden warbler (Sylvia borin) at the UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Swabian Alb.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 12:12:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Swabian Alb is a fascinating place to listen and, if lucky enough, watch birds such as the Eurasian skylark and others. This Garden Warbler was spied singing his beautiful spring anthem in an almost blooming Hawthorn Crataegus monogyna. UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Swabian Alb.

File:Dolina Chochołowska i tatrzańskie krokusy.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 10:13:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tatra National Park
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Qvidemus - uploaded by Qvidemus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, I like this. I can see others opposing because of the blurry foreground though. I don't mind the blown-out areas, it seems to me that in a very bright sunny photo the highlights kind of should be dazzlingly bright. Overall this is a dreamlike composition and it really works. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice mood and some beautiful light effects. --Bob Collowan (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Apart fromt the tilt I see a nice scene with moderate wow effect, disturbing elements (like left crop, shadow on right) and some overexposed areas, overall not a FP to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco a poco. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco, but I also find it overly busy compositionally (maybe something focusing more on just the hut and the trees behind it) and harshly lit on the right. Daniel Case (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - It's nice, but it's so bright that I can't see details in any of the flowers on the ground, and I want to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Masked Lapwing - Newington.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 05:00:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Masked Lapwing
  • @Frank Schulenburg: Did You look at shooting time? It was early in the morning, when light conditions were soft and warm. --Ivar (talk) 10:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice-looking bird. -- King of ♥ 05:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 11:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice motif but a bit small and the blurry area at the bottom is too dominant Poco a poco (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Poco --Andrei (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I feel like that amount of blurred area damages the composition enough for it not to be an FP. It looks like I'll be outvoted, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes, and I've not had a response to the question I asked. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Pfersag-Wasserfall-20200308-RM-113024.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 21:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pfersag waterfall in the district of Lichtenfels in Upper Franconia
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Waterfall in the district of Lichtenfels in Upper Franconia. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very beautiful, but framing could be slightly better: crop out a bit on the left, give a bit more breathing room at the top. -- King of ♥ 22:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very high resolution but the light is not very attractive, and the composition not well balanced (crop at the top too tight) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Basile. I wasn't sure about this and I nearly supported it because of the great resolution, but I don't like the light, it's too dull for me and doesn't stand out from other FP waterfalls. I also think the detail looks a little bit odd at full size, hard to explain it though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above, and the amount of water is a bit limited, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, and pleasant to look at at full size as well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Nové Mlýny Reservoir - Dam 2020 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 20:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dam of Nové Mlýny reservoir cascade
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Czech Republic
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The exact gallery for the Czech Republic doesn't yet exist. Not sure about the right procedure. --T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Light is maybe not the best but I like the composition and the reflection. Wouldn't worry about specifying a gallery that doesn't exist yet, I've done that before. Cmao20 (talk) 22:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dull light, ordinary image -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's fine, but lacking in wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 07:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile -- Alsakan (talk) 16:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile, also rather cluttered compositionally. Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I disagree with some of you, in that I think this is a good composition and the clouds really help. However, the sharpness isn't overwhelming and I'd love a little more light to shine on the dam. I think this is a good motif and a strong QI and near-FP photo, and it's worth trying to shoot this scene in different lights and weather conditions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Stadtquartier Overbergplatz -- 2020 -- 7378 (bw).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 17:14:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

StadtQuartier Overbergplatz, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 17:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 17:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support perspective and special. Black / white gives me an extra dimension.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Famberhorst. Cmao20 (talk) 22:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the tilt, nor the crop at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile.--Peulle (talk) 07:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I couldn't find anything spectacular enough to get this image featured. Although the cloud gap with the rooftops is an interesting idea, it doesn't work for me overall. --T.Bednarz (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the composition is not for me --Andrei (talk) 14:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

File:SL Galle Fort asv2020-01 img24.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 15:05:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Galle Lighthouse

File:Klagenfurt Innere Stadt Theaterplatz 4 Stadttheater SW-Ansicht 18052020 9029.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 14:36:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Klagenfurt Innere Stadt Theaterplatz

File:Durmitor mountains, Montenegro.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 11:13:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Montenegro
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition and for once I think the shadows really add to it, they give the landscape depth somehow. Maybe the resolution is a bit low for FP though. Cmao20 (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per above. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Could you add the location? -- -donald- (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    done --Pudelek (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is not "extraordinary enough to be FP" for me. It is highly subjective. I have seen a lots of mountainous landscapes in my life and this one is just too ordinary for me (although defínitelly nice and well done.) --Grtek (talk) 10:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Grtek Poco a poco (talk) 18:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sort of per Grtek, but if the sharpness at full size hadn't struck me as underwhelming, I might have supported. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Three-course meal including Bistecca alla fiorentina (Bistec a la fiorentina).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 17:41:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Andrei (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crops don't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I take Charles' point but it looks so tasty I can't oppose, especially when you have presented it to us with such high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 00:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is a nice, moody image and the crop is OK for me, too. However the flaw I see is that according to the image title, the scene is about the meat which isn't in focus while focus is set on the secondary elements like bread and the cheese. --Basotxerri (talk) 08:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

*Symbol support vote.svg Support The focus should have been on the lemons, then the roast would certainly have been a bit sharper. But it is still good.--Ermell (talk) 09:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with T.Bednarz.--Ermell (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well, according to Wikipedia, it shouldn't be served with lemon. All the bread etc. has nothing to do with the dish (Bistecca alla fiorentina), which is (as pointed out above) blurred. My view, as written previously Cmao20, is that high resolution should not be a major factor to be considered here. High resolution for panoramas, church interiors, macro insects etc. are essential so you can zoom in on the details. High resolution of an out-of-focus image surely doesn't add any value, does it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose According to the title “Bistecca alla Fiorentina” the meat has to be in the center of the picture and not cheese and bread, which are not elements of a real Fiorentina dish.--Christof46 (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Tomascastelazo, I fixed the gallery and categories for you on this since you still seems to have some trouble with that. Do you want me to re-name and move this file to: "Three-course meal including Bistecca alla fiorentina (Bistec a la fiorentina).jpg"? I think that would make this nomination go better. --Cart (talk) 18:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Cart lol! I am useless in categorizing!!! I woul really appreciate you doing what you suggest!!! Keep safe and many thanks!!! Tomascastelazo (talk)
  • Ok, will fix. Stay safe, you too! --Cart (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Please Cart ping those who voted in favour of the previous description, not just the oppose voters. Let's have balance. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Charlesjsharp, I pinged those who had voiced some problem with the name or the context of it, otherwise I would've pinged opposer T.Bednarz in that post too. But as per your request I'm pinging everybody else now, I hope that is satisfactory for you. Pinging Cmao20, Andrei, Ermell. --Cart (talk) 21:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • simply changing the wording of the title makes me confused, what is the message of the picture?--Christof46 (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Though the enormous resolution, I am not a fan of this image. Considering it as a studio shot, I'd prefer not to have the cropped parts of the image, like the plate or the lemon slices, displayed in it at all. I'm also not impressed by the focus, since the main part of the dish is blurred as mentioned above. However, the piece of blue tapestry in the background looks also quite redundant to me. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 18:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- My criterium when looking at pictures of food is, does it make me hungry? This picture does. MartinD (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per T.Bednarz. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support "Bread and Cheese to be eaten after having a nice Bistecca". OK, then. And per MartinD. --Basotxerri (talk) 13:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. Also, the foods are not appealing enough for me. -- Alsakan (talk) 18:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The whole table to me looks too arranged for a real-life situation but too chaotic for a studio setup. It feels like ist was arranged hastily ("before you all dig in, let's push it all together so we can take a picture"), and that doesn't work. The crumpled corner of the red tapestry plays a big part in that. As it is now, the three slices of bread are the visual focal point of the image in terms of location, sharpness, lighting and exposure – but not in a way that would make them the star of the image, as all the other dished look much more interesting from a culinary POV. --El Grafo (talk) 11:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just too cluttered compositionally. Less would definitely have been more here. Daniel Case (talk) 00:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfavorable crop.--Milseburg (talk) 10:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. It all looks delicious, but I think it would have been better compositionally to focus on a subset of these items and not crop anything. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

File:View from Stolová hora to the north in the morning.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 16:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:20180819 ReuttenerSeilbahn vorZugspitze blau DSC00935 PtrQs.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 12:50:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Cableways
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by PtrQs - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice minimalistic composition. -- Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mimihitam (talk) 14:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing spectacular here. Seven Pandas (talk) 14:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good quality but I incline to agree with Seven Pandas. It's all a bit empty for me, there's not much tension in the composition. Cmao20 (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Subject in the shadow -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As this picture is generated from a raw file there is almost no limit to highlighting, but a) the gondola is coated by tinted glass, and b) artificially minimizing the constrast would mean to destroy the monochromatic blueish look by flashy red colors. --PtrQs (talk) 23:44, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm not saying you can save this nomination with a better post-processing, unfortunately, this gondola is very dark and thus uninteresting in my view (like this one) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 11:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 03:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the overall effect very much. I don't think it's a problem that the gondola is darker than the background -- which is the real subject. — Rhododendrites talk |  04:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support love the overall effect, gondola is not the object here, but the background with its lovely shades of blue. Renata3 (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The odd position and lighting on the gondola may have been intentional, but it doesn't work fo me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:08, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing stands out to warrant FP. -- Alsakan (talk) 18:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I could see this working as a horizontal ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This composition just does not work on a computer screen. I really dislike it especially in full screen mode. But looking at the thumb on the nomination page made me realize: It needs to be printed large, hung on an otherwise empty white wall and looked at from a distance of at least 3 meters. Perfect for waiting rooms or for relaxing your eyes in the office. Stare at it and get lost in your thoughts. The gondola could be a plain black silhouette and it wouldn't matter. It is not what you're looking at, it's only there to provide an additional layer of depth – and because of that it is positioned exactly where it needs to be. --El Grafo (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support El Grafo's idea finally convinced me. --T.Bednarz (talk) 10:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support how to take great shot in the day of bad atmospheric conditions. --Grtek (talk) 10:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:00, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 13:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I was going to oppose, but I looked at the full-page image from about 1.5 and then 1.7 or so meters, and I see more depth in it from there. I think I'll abstain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Zitting cisticola feeding its chicks.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 12:22:57 (UTC)
Visit the