Commons:Requests and votes/Royalbroil

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Symbol support vote.svg Support = 12; Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose = 0; Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral = 1 - 92% Result = successful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)



Links for Royalbroil: Royalbroil (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · SULinfo)

I'd like to nominate Royalbroil for adminship. Royalbroil is helpful and offers a sound voice in discussions with other users. He has been a sysop on the English Wikipedia since November 2007 and does sterling work in that capacity. I think commons would benefit from also granting him a few extra buttons. Royalbroil has uploaded over 1000 images to Commons and helps out as a flickr reviewer. His deleted contributions show sensible tagging of media files and other pages for deletion. I think Royalbroil has a good understanding of how commons works; he would make good use of the tools as part of his image review work and for general maintenance. He has my full confidence. WJBscribe (talk) 01:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I accept this nomination, thank you for you confidence, WJBscribe. The tools would be helpful, as I do find copyright violations (especially while reviewing flickr images). Royalbroil 01:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as nom. WJBscribe (talk) 01:24, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Trusting scribe's good judgment. MBisanz talk 03:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Motopark (talk) 04:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg voor Huib talk 09:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Majorly talk 11:56, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nom. Cirt (talk) 20:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Most certainly. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm still concerned about the lack of involvement in community discussons, but this is a trustworthy user with a solid record on Commons. I hope that when you gain these extra tools (and extra trust) we will get to see even more of you. Thanks for helping. Finn Rindahl (talk) 00:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - Won't oppose, because it is WJB's nom, won't support because I agree with Finn. Please do get involved more whether this passes (as I expect it will) or not, best wishes. ++Lar: t/c 19:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg voor Freaky Fries (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support trustworthy user that I illingly support --High Contrast (talk) 15:05, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportAnonymous DissidentTalk 11:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Foroa (talk) 15:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question some nine months ago you said [1] that you did not know Commons policies well enough to apply for adminship here, in what way have your contributions/edit pattern here changed since then so that you now feel ready? To elaborate, I'm a bit concerned that you haven't been very active in the Commons namespace. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 14:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Several things have changed. The biggest one is that I became trusted to review flickr images. The trust caused me to review Commons' policies and guidelines to get a better understanding on how everything works. I got to see the difference between speedy and regular deletions. I've participated in some discussions on regular deletions. Royalbroil 00:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)