Commons:Administratorer
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Denne siden forklarer rollen til administratorene (også kalt admins eller sysops) på Wikimedia Commons. Merk at detaljene rundt rollen, og hvordan administratorene utnevnes, kan være forskjellig fra andre wikier.
Om du ønsker hjelp fra en administrator, post på administratorenes oppslagstavle.
Det er for tiden 177 administratorer på Commons.
Hva er en administrator?
Administrators as of april 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 177
If 177 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Teknisk
Administratorer er brukere med den tekniske muligheten til å:
- slette og gjenopprette bilder og andre opplastede filer, og vise og gjenopprette slettede versjoner
- slette og gjenopprette sider, og vise og gjenopprette slettede versjoner
- beskytte og avbeskytte sider, og redigere sider som er helt beskyttede
- blokkere og avblokkere brukere, individuelle IP-adresser og IP-områder
- redigere visse grensesnittbeskjeder (se også Commons:Grensesnittadministratorer)
- endre navn på filer
- legge til og fjerne brukergrupper
- konfigurere UploadWizard-kampanjer
- slette og gjenopprette visse loggoppføringer og revisjoner av sider
- importere sider fra andre wikier
- slå sammen historikken til sider
- endre misbruksfiltre
- ikke opprette omdirigeringer når sider flyttes
- overstyre sjekk mot svartelister for brukernavn og sidetitler
- sende meldinger til flere brukere samtidig (massmessage)
- bruke høyere grenser i API-spørringer
Disse er kollektivt kjent som administratorverktøy.
Rolle i fellesskapet
Administratorer er erfarne og pålitelige medlemmer av fellesskapet på Commons som har tatt på seg ekstra vedlikeholdsarbeid og har fått tillit til det i avstemning. Forskjellige administratorer har forskjellige interesse- og ekspertiseområder, men typiske adminoppgaver består av å avgjøre utfallet av sletteforespørsler, slette filer med opphavsrettsbrudd, gjenopprette filer der det trengs, beskytte Commons fra vandalisme, og å jobbe med maler og andre beskyttede sider. Selvsagt kan noen av disse oppgavene gjøres også av brukere som ikke er administratorer.
Administratorer forventes å forstå målene til dette prosjektet, og være forberedt på å jobbe konstruktivt med andre for å nå disse. Administratorer bør også forstå og følge Commons' Template:Pc, og respektere konsensusen i fellesskapet der det trengs.
Bortsett fra roller som krever bruken av administratorverktøy har ikke administratorene noen spesiell redaksjonell autoritet, og i diskusjoner og avstemninger teller deres stemmer på samme måte som vanlige bidragsyteres. Noen administratorer kan ha større påvirkningskraft, men ikke på grunn av deres rolle, men fordi mange i fellesskapet stoler på dem.
Forslag til administratorer
Les Commons:Guide to adminship.
Fjerning av administratorrettigheter
I følge reglene for fjerning av administrotorrettigheter kan administratorrettighetene fjernes dersom en bruker er inaktiv eller misbruker administratorverktøyene. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.
Søk om å bli administrator
Alle som ønsker å bli administrator må gå gjennom denne prosessen og skrive inn en søknad på RFA, inkludert alle tidligere administratorer som ønsker å komme tilbake til rollen.
Gå først til Commons:Administrators/Howto og les informasjonen der. Kom så tilbake hit og lever søknaden i seksjonen nedenfor.
- Etter at du har trykket på riktig knapp og opprettet undersiden, kopier lenka til undersiden, f.eks. «Commons:Administrators/Requests/Brukernavn», rediger Commons:Administrators/Requests og lim den inn på toppen av seksjonen, og putt den i doble krøllparenteser (altså {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) for å transkludere den.
- Hvis noen andre har nominert deg, godta nominasjonen ved å skrive «Jeg godtar» eller lignende, og signer under selve nominasjonen. Undersiden må fortsatt transkluderes av deg eller nominatoren.
Bruk boksen nedenfor, og erstatt «Brukernavn» med ditt brukernavn: |
Stemming
Alle registrerte brukere kan stemme her, men de som ikke har noen bidrag fra før vil ikke telles. Det foretrekkes om man oppgir grunnen til at man stemmer enten Support eller
Oppose, siden dette vil hjelpe byråkratene med å gjøre sin endelige avgjørelse. Større vekt gis til argumenter med støttende bevis dersom det trengs, enn til grunnløse stemmer.
Å bli forfremmet krever som regel 75 % stemmer for, med minst 8 stemmer for. Stemmer fra uregistrerte brukere telles ikke. Byråkraten som stenger avstemningen kan imidlertid bruke skjønn, og avgjørelsen vil ikke alltid være basert på bare antall stemmer.
Neutral-kommentarer telles ikke i totalen når man regner ut prosentandelen for/imot. Slike kommentarer er likevel del av diskusjonen, kan overbevise andre, og bidra til at byråkraten som stenger avstemningen får bedre forståelse av konsensus.
Gjenoppfrisk mellomlageret Bruk redigeringslenka nedenfor for å redigere den transkluderte siden.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Kaganer (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 23:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi all! As Translation administrators i was faced with the need to delete a page with an incorrect language code (see. this case). But TA doesn't have delete
right, and regular admins can't delete translation pages... Please grant me an admin flag (can be temporary) or consider including this right in the list of TA rights.--Kaganer (talk) 23:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Votes
- sorry, you only give one reason about it. yeah, we indeed need such a group that will handle deletions. so,
no. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 10:18, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- In more than 20 years of my working on Wikimedia projects, including Commons, I have never had any complaints from the admins (in general, and in Commons). I don't intend to use the admin rights outside the designated area, and I will certainly replace this with a "narrower one" rights when this becomes.
If we take that I have an admin rights in other projects (Meta and MediaWiki.org), it's hardly worth fearing that I'll suddenly misuse that flag here or use it carelessly. --Kaganer (talk) 22:23, 19 April 2025 (UTC)- @Kaganer Hopefully you can do work in other areas if you have the time. :-) Bedivere (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Of course, I'm just not ready to make any firm promises. --Kaganer (talk) 16:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Kaganer Hopefully you can do work in other areas if you have the time. :-) Bedivere (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- In more than 20 years of my working on Wikimedia projects, including Commons, I have never had any complaints from the admins (in general, and in Commons). I don't intend to use the admin rights outside the designated area, and I will certainly replace this with a "narrower one" rights when this becomes.
Support We definitely could use more regular admins and having another Russian speaking admin would be handy. They're experienced enough, and so giving them the mop would help us. Abzeronow (talk) 17:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your confidence. Unfortunately, I can't promise any substantial administrative activity from me. But I once compiled a list of Russian-speaking admins, and I keep it on my userpage. --Kaganer (talk) 22:33, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- I will not expect such, and I would be fine with whatever level of contribution you can do. As The Squirrel Conspiracy says, action in a narrow area could help us by letting us concentrate more on other areas. Abzeronow (talk) 00:10, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your confidence. Unfortunately, I can't promise any substantial administrative activity from me. But I once compiled a list of Russian-speaking admins, and I keep it on my userpage. --Kaganer (talk) 22:33, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Very experienced user. Thank you for volunteering. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:08, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Support, I do not see any problems--Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per modern_primat, sorry. --A.Savin 19:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Experienced user. Incall talk 07:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К 09:24, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Support trustworthy. --0x0a (talk) 09:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I don't generally have an issue with Kaganer being an admin. It seems pointless to give them the right if they only want it for one thing and can't commit to doing the job outside of that though. Serious question but is there really no other Translation administrators that can't delete the page for them? --Adamant1 (talk) 10:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Any admin can make themselves a translation admin. But that doesn't mean that they're going to; it's an obscure corner of the project and not everyone is going to feel comfortable taking admin actions in it. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Adamant1 --Mateus2019 (talk) 11:07, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- When I observe administrators' actions, I notice that each of them typically focuses on a specific set of tasks: some review FoP cases, others handle bot rights requests, others evaluate autopatrol rights requests, and so on. These areas rarely overlap. Therefore, I see nothing unusual in the fact that Kaganer’s range of administrative actions will be narrow — most active administrators specialize in a limited scope.As for Adamant1’s objection, a closer look at the list of TAs reveals that few administrators are among them, and the languages they speak are quite limited (en, de, fr, ja). I doubt this is sufficient.The real question is whether this user can be trusted with administrator rights at all. Checking CentralAuth, we can see that he already holds admin rights on several wikis. I have interacted with him on the Russian Wikipedia several times — his decisions have always been reasonable and balanced. He is particularly knowledgeable in copyright matters. If I’m not mistaken, he has been elected to the Arbitration Committee several times.So, regarding trustworthiness, my answer is
Support. Olksolo (talk) 13:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Support No issue with trustworthiness. --Yann (talk) 14:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Neutral per Adamant1. Kaganer looks to be a good editor though, so probably someday if they actually have a wider need/use for it in the future. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 15:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Support I don't see any trust issues with this user, and if someone wants the tools to help solve one problem, we should give it to them. Not every single admin has to do every admin action, we're all volunteers. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 19:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Support no concerns. ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Support I'm fine if they only need the right for this one, valid, reason. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Support I believe Olksolo has answered well about the objections. Shaan SenguptaTalk 10:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Support good luck! RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Support They have been contributing since at least 2004. --Jerimee (talk) 23:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Net-positive for the community, and is trusted enough. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Kaganer has 124,621 edits to Commons, so it's not like they're going to sit on the mop and not do anything. And if they're taking admin actions in one specific area, it frees up other admins to do other work. And if they make 200 admin actions a year, that puts them in the top half of admins by activity. We've got a lot of admins already that don't log many admin actions. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Taivo (talk) 07:39, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Support I for one appreciate Kaganer being so straightforward about their planned level of activity and commitment. Any admin action is worth it. Thanks for helping! Jean-Fred (talk) 17:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Support . Fit India 12:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Support per multiple Admins above. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:19, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Support a long-time users since 2006, and experienced enough. The opposing side is not convincing enough to overturn my decision. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:54, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Support plausible arguments for the application and implausible arguments against. --Gauss (talk) 14:09, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Support. — ArtSmir (talk) 14:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Support I see no reason for opposition. Sure, they're only asking to do "one thing", but a basic review of the user makes me confident that this user is capable to do most things an admin should (which of courses doesn't mean he has to do all of them). If so, why not.--Takipoint123 (💬) 01:10, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Even if its only for one reason, they are a long time trusted user. Have no concerns about misuse of tools. --JackFromWisconsin (talk) 02:37, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Support. —— Eric Liu(Talk) 10:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Achim55 (talk) 11:27, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Support. --Ыфь77 (talk) 11:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Support They ask it for just one reason but I think they can be trusted to do work in other areas, if they wish to, they're most than welcome IMO! --Bedivere (talk) 16:31, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Support. Trusted with a good use case for the mop. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 16:45, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Nemoralis (talk) 22:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Tasks