Commons:Amministratura

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Administrators and the translation is 56% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Administrators and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Outdated translations are marked like this.

Shortcut: COM:A· COM:ADMIN· COM:SYSOP

Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Bahasa Melayu • ‎Canadian English • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎Lëtzebuergesch • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎Türkçe • ‎als • ‎asturianu • ‎brezhoneg • ‎català • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎interlingua • ‎italiano • ‎magyar • ‎norsk bokmål • ‎occitan • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎sicilianu • ‎suomi • ‎svenska • ‎čeština • ‎Ελληνικά • ‎беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ • ‎български • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎հայերեն • ‎עברית • ‎العربية • ‎فارسی • ‎مصرى • ‎پښتو • ‎नेपाली • ‎मराठी • ‎हिन्दी • ‎বাংলা • ‎ไทย • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어
Commons Administrator.svg

Sta pàggina spiega lu rolu di l'amministratura (a li voti chiamati admins o sysops) nta Wikimedia Commons. Teni prisenti ca li dittagghi supra lu rolu e la manera ntâ quali sunnu numinati ponnu diffiriri di l'àutri siti.

Si si voli addumannari l'aiutu di n'amministraturi, scrìviri un post nta Administrators' noticeboard.

Ci sunnu attualmenti 218 amministratura nta Commons.

Un admin ca ci havi nu spazzuluni, sìmmulu cumuni di l'amministratura. Talìa macari: The good admin.

Cui è n'amministraturi?

Administrators as of Sittèmmiru 2019 [+/−]
Listing by language
Listing by date
Listing by activity

Number of Admins: 218

  1. -revi, ko, en-3 (steward)
  2. ~riley, en, fr-1, es-1
  3. 1989, en
  4. 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  5. 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1
  6. 4nn1l2, fa, en-3, ar-1
  7. 99of9, en (bureaucrat)
  8. A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2
  9. Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2
  10. AFBorchert, de, en-3
  11. Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1 (global renamer)
  12. Aka, de, en-3
  13. Alan, es, eu-3, en-2
  14. Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1
  15. Amada44, de, en-3, fr-1
  16. Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1
  17. AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1
  18. Anthere, fr, en-3
  19. Arthur Crbz, fr, en-4, es-3
  20. Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3
  21. AzaToth, sv, en-4
  22. Benoît Prieur,fr, en-3, pt-2, es-1, it-1, hy-1
  23. Benoit Rochon, fr, en-4
  24. Billinghurst, en
  25. Blackcat, it, en-3, fr
  26. BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1
  27. Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1
  28. Cambalachero, es, en-3
  29. Captain-tucker, en
  30. ChrisiPK, de, en-3, fr-1
  31. Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2, es-2
  32. Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1
  33. Common Good, en
  34. Cookie, es, en-2
  35. Czar, en
  36. DaB., de, en-1
  37. Dantadd, it, pt, en-3, es-3, fr-3, gl-3, ca-2, ro-1, el-1
  38. DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1
  39. Davepape, en
  40. David Levy, en
  41. De728631, de, en-5
  42. Dereckson, fr, en-3, de-1, nl-1
  43. DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward)
  44. Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3
  45. DMacks, en
  46. Didym, de, en-2, fr-2
  47. Dyolf77, ar, fr-5, en-2, it-1, es-1
  48. D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1
  49. Ebrahim, fa
  50. Edgar181, en, de-1, fr-1, es-1
  51. Elcobbola en, de (checkuser)
  52. Ellin Beltz, en (bureaucrat)
  53. Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1
  54. Érico, pt, en-2, es-1 (global renamer)
  55. EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat)
  56. Explicit, en, es, ko-2
  57. Ezarate, es-3, en-1
  58. Flominator, de, als, en-3
  59. FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1
  60. Gbawden, en-3, af-1
  61. Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1
  62. Geni, en
  63. George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1
  64. Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3
  65. Gnangarra, en, nys-1
  66. Golbez, en, ja-2
  67. Green Giant, en, de-1, fr-1 (steward)
  68. grin, hu, en-3, de-1
  69. Guanaco, en, es-1
  70. Hedwig in Washington, de, en-4, nds-1
  71. Hekerui, de, en-4
  72. Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1
  73. Hesperian, en
  74. Howcheng, en, ja-2
  75. Huntster, en
  76. Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2
  77. Infrogmation, en, es-1
  78. Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  79. Jaqen, it, en-2
  80. Jarekt, pl, en
  81. JarrahTree, en, id-1
  82. Jcb, nl, en-3, es-3
  83. Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1
  84. Jdforrester, en
  85. Jdx, pl
  86. Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1
  87. JGHowes, en, fr-2, de-1
  88. Jianhui67, en, zh-4, ja-2, ms-1 (global renamer)
  89. Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1
  90. Joergens.mi, de, en-3
  91. JoKalliauer, de, en-3
  92. Jon Kolbert, en, fr-4, de-2
  93. Josve05a, sv, en-3
  94. Juliancolton, en
  95. Julo, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  96. JuTa, de, en-2, fr-1 (bureaucrat)
  97. Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-2, ko-1
  98. Kaldari, en
  99. Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1
  100. King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1
  101. Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1
  102. Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
  103. Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2
  104. Kwj2772, ko, en-3
  105. Leit, de, en-3, fr-1
  106. Léna, fr, en-3, es-1
  107. Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1
  108. Lofty abyss, en, mt, it-2
  109. Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1
  110. Magog the Ogre, en, es-2 (checkuser)
  111. Mahagaja, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1
  112. Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1 (global renamer)
  113. Majora, en, fr-2, it-1
  114. Marcus Cyron, de, en-2
  115. Mardetanha fa, az, en-3, tr-2, ar-1 (steward)
  116. Martin H., de, en-2
  117. Masur, pl, en-3, de-1
  118. Matanya, en, he (steward)
  119. Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1
  120. Mates, cs, en-3, sk-4, de-1
  121. Mattbuck, en, fr-1, la-1
  122. Maxim, ru, en-3, fr-2
  123. MB-one, de, en-3, fr-1, pt-1
  124. MBisanz, en (steward)
  125. Mhhossein, fa, en-3, ar-1
  126. Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1
  127. Mike Peel, en, pt-2, fr-1
  128. Missvain, en
  129. Mitchazenia, en, es-2
  130. Miya, ja, en-2
  131. Moheen, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1
  132. Morgankevinj, en
  133. MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1
  134. Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
  135. Mys 721tx, zh, en-3 (global renamer)
  136. Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1
  137. NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1 (steward)
  138. Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1
  139. Neozoon, de, en-4, nl-4, fr-2
  140. Nick, en, sco-2, fr-1
  141. notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2
  142. Nyttend, en, ang-1
  143. odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter)
  144. Otourly, fr, en-2, it-1
  145. P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1
  146. Perhelion, de, en-3
  147. Pi.1415926535, en, es-2
  148. PierreSelim, fr, en-3, es-1 (oversighter)
  149. Pitke, fi, en-4, sv-2
  150. Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1
  151. Pleclown, fr, en-3
  152. Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1
  153. Podzemnik, cs, en-2
  154. Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1
  155. Putnik, ru, en-2
  156. Pyb, fr, en-2
  157. Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1
  158. Racconish, fr, en-4
  159. Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1
  160. Ra'ike, de, en-2
  161. Rama, fr, en-3, de-2, la-2, es-1, it-1, ja-1 (oversighter)
  162. Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1
  163. Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter)
  164. Rehman, en, si-1
  165. Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3
  166. Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1
  167. Rodhullandemu, en, fr-1, de-1, sv-1
  168. Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1
  169. Ronhjones, en, fr-1
  170. Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1
  171. Royalbroil, en, es-1
  172. RP88, en, de-1
  173. Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2
  174. Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1
  175. Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1
  176. Sealle, ru, en-4, pl-2, sk-2, uk-2
  177. Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1
  178. Spiritia, bg, en-3, ru-2, mk-2, de-1
  179. Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1
  180. Srittau, de, en-3
  181. Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1 (global renamer)
  182. Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1
  183. Storkk, en, fr-3, de-2, eo-2
  184. Strakhov, es, en-2
  185. Tabercil, en
  186. TadejM, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2
  187. Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1
  188. Tarawneh, en, ar, de-1
  189. Techman224, en
  190. Teles, pt, en-3, es-2 (steward)
  191. Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1
  192. Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-2
  193. Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2
  194. Trijnstel, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1 (checkuser, steward)
  195. Tulsi Bhagat, ne, mai, en-3, hi-2, bh-2, hif-2
  196. Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1
  197. VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1
  198. Wdwd, de, en-2
  199. Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3
  200. Whym, ja, en-2
  201. Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, as-2, bpy-1
  202. Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1
  203. Wuzur, de, en-3
  204. wvk, de, en-4, fa-3, fr-2
  205. Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1
  206. Yarl, pl, en-2, de-1, ru-1
  207. Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1
  208. Y.haruo, ja, en-1
  209. Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1
  210. Yuval Y, he, en-3
  211. Zhuyifei1999‎, zh, en-4
  212. Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1
  213. علاء, ar, en-4, he-1, es-1 (steward)
  214. Abuse filter, (automated account)
  215. CommonsDelinker, (bot) see request
  216. CommonsMaintenanceBot, (bot) see request
  217. KrinkleBot, (bot) see request

The system currently recognizes 218 administrators. If that is not the last number in the list above, there is an error in the list.

Chistioni tècnichi

L'amministratura sunnu utenti câ capacità tècnica nta Wikimedia Commons pi:

  • Cancillari o ricupirari mmàggini e àutri file carricati, virificari e ripristinari li virsioni cancillati
  • Cancillari o ricupirari pàggini, virificari e ripristinari li rivisioni cancillati
  • Prutèggiri o livari la prutizzioni evintuali ê pàggini, canciari chiddi stissi pàggini ca foru prutiggiuti di àutri amministratura
  • Bluccari o sbluccari l'utenzi di l'utenti, comu puru li nnirizzi IP ndividuali o la gamma di nnirizzi IP
  • Canciari lu spazziu nomu
  • Rinuminari li file
  • Livari gruppi d'utenti (requests for rights)
  • Cunfigurari campagni pô carricamentu cu prucidura guidata
  • Cancillari e ripristinari vuci comu puru rivisiunari lu riggistru spicìficu di na pàggina
  • Mpurtari pàggini di àutri wiki
  • Uniri la crunuluggìa dê pàggini
  • Canciari li filtri d'abbusu
  • Nun criari rinnirizzamenti di pàggini quannu chisti hannu a èssiri spustati e canciati dô nomu origginali
  • Gnurari li cuntrolli di spoofing e lu tìtulu, o lu nomu utenti dâ blacklist
  • Mannari un missaggiu a chiù utenti e cuntimpuraniamenti (massmessage)
  • Utilizzari li lìmiti chiù àuti pê ntirrugazzioni API

Chisti sunnu noti ntâ cullittività comu li strummenti di l'amministratura.

Rolu ntâ Cumunità

L'amministratura sunnu membri sperti e affidàbbili dâ cumunità Commons, li quali ntrapigghiaru un travagghiu di manutinzioni ultiriuri: a iddi foru affidati li strummenti d'amministraturi e hannu un pirmissu pùbblicu pi zocchi pò èssiri un votu/cunzenzu. Diversi amministratura hannu diffirenti àrii di ntiressi e cumpitenza, nunostanti ca li còmpiti tìpici di l'amministratura cumprènninu: la ditirminazzioni e cunchiusioni d'addumannati di cancillazzioni; la cancillazzioni di viulazzioni dô copyright; lu riprìstinu di file si avissi a èssiri nicissariu; la prutizzioni ntê cunfronti di Commons di parti di dd'utenzi ca dê sò canciamenti nni fannu mutivu di vannalismu; travagghiari ntê mudelli (usualmenti chiamati e canusciuti dô tèrmini templates), e àutri evintuali canciamenti ntê pàggini ca sunnu prutiggiuti. Naturalmenti, arcuni di sti còmpiti ponnu macari èssiri svolti di utenti nun-amministratura.

Si ci aspetta ca l'amministratura cumprènninu li scopi di stu pruggettu, e sunnu priparati a travagghiari custruttivamenti cu l'àutri pi sti fini. L'amministratura noltri avìssiru a cumprènniri e seguiri li pulìtichi di Commons, e unni apprupiatu rispittari la culliggialità dâ cumunità.

Oltri ô rolu c'addumanna l'usu dê strummenti d'amministrazzioni, l'amministratura nun pussèdinu auturità edituriali spiciali n virtù dâ sò pusizzioni, e ô nternu di discussioni e vutazzioni pùbblichi li sò cuntribbuti sunnu cunzidirati â stissa manera di n'utenti edituri nurmali. Naturalmenti arcuni amministratura hannu chiù nfluenza, ma chistu nun diriva tantu dâ sò pusizzioni quantu dâ fiducia ca guadagnaru ô nternu dâ cumunità.

Suggirimenti pi l'amministratura

Lèggiti Commons:Guide to adminship.

Livamentu dê privileggi d'amministraturi

Sicunnu la de-admin policy, li privileggi d'amministraturi ponnu èssiri rivucati pi nun attività o usu erratu dê strummenti.

Addumannata p'addivintari amministraturi

All intending administrators must go through this process and submit themselves to RFA, including all ex-administrators who are seeking to return to their previous role.

Comu prima cosa abbisogna jiri ntâ pàggina Amministraturi/Howto e liggìrisi li nfurmazzioni ca sunnu ripurtati ddà. Doppudichì si pò turnari ccà p'effittuari la vostra addumannata ntâ sizzioni suttastanti.

  • After clicking on the appropriate button and creating the subpage, copy the link to the subpage, e.g. "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edit Commons:Administrators/Requests and paste it in at the top of the section, then put it in double curly brackets (e.g. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}} ) to transclude it.
  • If someone else nominated you, please accept the nomination by stating "I accept" or something similar, and signing below the nomination itself. The subpage will still need to be transcluded by you or your nominator.
Use the box below, replacing Username with your username:


Voting

Any registered user may vote here although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted. It is preferable if you give reasons both for Symbol support vote.svg Support votes or Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ones as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to an argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.

Promotion normally requires at least 75% in favour, with a minimum of 8 support votes. Votes from unregistered users are not counted. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers.

Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral comments are not counted in the vote totals for the purposes of calculating pass/fail percentages. However such comments are part of the discussion, may persuade others, and contribute to the closing bureaucrat's understanding of community consensus.

Purge the cache Use the edit link below to edit the transcluded page.

Requests for adminship

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

DannyS712

Vote

DannyS712 (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 11:21, (UTC)

Lots of good edits, I think he could be good enough to be an administrator. Calvinkulit (talk) 11:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Co-nomination by Masumrezarock100

DannyS712 (talk · contribs) – Ladies and gentlemen, let me introduce you to DannyS712. I first encountered him when he left a message on my talk page on English Wikipedia about a script. As you might have guessed, he creates user scripts and assists in areas where technical support is needed. He also has written few gadgets for some small wikis. True, his global account is only one year old. But despite that he has done a lot of good works on Wikimedia projects. He holds several advanced rights on English Wikipedia as well as on Commons. Aside from that he is a patroller and translation admin on meta-wiki, and he serves as an admin on Mediawiki.org. He also holds several advanced permissions in some Wikimedia projects which proves that he is not a rookie and has experience with sensitive rights. He is a very active editor as his edit count has passed over 70 thousand on English Wikipedia. I am sure he will become one of the most active admins on Commons, if he becomes a sysop. I am not quite familiar with his works on Commons, but after reviewing some of his recent contributions, I have no doubt that he will be prolific admin. Therefore it is my pleasure to co-nominate Danny for the admin bits. Masum Reza📞 08:02, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Votes

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as proposer. Calvinkulit (talk) 11:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Natuur12 (talk) 15:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I usually have my standards and honestly I don’t think they qualify right now. Despite their account age being nearly a year, they only done more editing here for nearly 4 months and their deleted count is under 500 edits. I don’t think it would be fair to give sysop tools to this candidate as recently there was a nomination by 大诺史 and their RfA was withdrawn due to account age and etc. As they are more familiar and experienced with enwiki, I would definitely support an RfA there and I can understand why they feel hesitant to do it. As I can also see, this is a surprise nomination. Nominators of candidates (like Calvinkulit) are expected to ask the candidate whether they would run for this or not, not just go on ahead and then later shut down when they refuse. Since the candidate has accepted this, I ask for more experience from them here before they become admin here. 1989 (talk) 15:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per 1989 --DCB (talk) 16:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support no concerns --Schlurcher (talk) 16:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'd rather not grant Commons' admin rights to the user, who do[es]n't plan to get involved in license reviewing. --VLu (talk) 16:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
    • Not sure why you think that. License reviewing is a non-admin task, admins may wish to take part in it. Many users avoid complicated areas, what's wrong with that? Masum Reza📞 19:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as co-nominator. Adminship is not just about license reviewing and upload count. IMO, nominees just needs to have experience and a good reason. I believe Danny already is a more suitable candidate. Masum Reza📞 19:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Lots of good edits, I think he could be good enough to be an administrator. - sorry, I can't make me an image here. I expect from a presentation more than this. To be honest - in m eyes, this is respectless. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mirer (talk) 03:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Changed from Oppose to Neutral. I am inclined to agree with 1989 and I think this nom took Danny as a suprise. I haven't seen any DR's from them, nor speedy deletes. This is a crucial part of an admins job on commons and I would like to see them contributing to and weighing on DR's to get some experience. (They might have already but I haven't come across them) And as 1989 points out another candidate was turned down for being too new but IMO contributes far more Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
    @Gbawden: you're right, it took me by complete surprise. But, see the 86 deletion requests I've started (though that list includes a few other pages; its the best I could get) --DannyS712 (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Definitely, We need to deal with ageism(edit count/account age), when they have shown good work on several projects, great technical abilities and they are aware of most of the policies. They have accepted that they won't get into something which they are not sure of, then what's the problem? QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 01:38, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
    They don't have much experience. 3 months of activity is not enough. That’s the problem. 1989 (talk) 02:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
    I agree that they don't have much experience and that's why they wish to stay away from complicated areas. But blocking vandals and some other admin tasks are easy tasks. Masum Reza📞 08:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
    Such tasks can be taken at enwiki, where imo they are experienced. 1989 (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
    See, instead of hypothetically arguing what I suggest is please try and look for two things. a) how much total time they must have spent through these last three months of activity. b) what are their big mistakes in that edit history/try and find out actual flaws/shortcomings if one could find anything and show it that they are not worth of having admin rights. then I will agree and change my vote too. otherwise this account age argument is not worth it, for me its a clear insult of their time + efforts. Some might take few thousand edits and a couple of years and some might get to the same point of maturity/understanding in few months or even in weeks too. Let's have some hard data and showcase that they have done some serious mistakes arising from their being younger in terms of edit count or account age. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 18:52, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per 1989 + never heard of the candidate + nominator + co-nominator, nothing personal, I'm sorry. --A.Savin 08:43, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
    Lol. Yes, I didn't used to edit Commons and I just started editing actively a month ago. I never heard of the nominator either. :) Masum Reza📞 08:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
    @Masumrezarock100: regardless of being a nominator or not, you’re not supposed to comment every vote. --VLu (talk) 09:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per A.Savin. Side note: nominator has a doubtful record, although this does not have effect on the question whether nominated user should be an admin. Jcb (talk) 15:49, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
  • moral Symbol support vote.svg Support. He is filemover, patroller, rollbacker and template editor. Exactly such people are often promoted to administrators. Taivo (talk) 16:01, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The nominator's and conominator's statements seemed a little weird to me. However, I think Danny would do a fine job. He might not have all the "expertise" some voters demand, but who said you had to be commenting or participating in every little corner of the site to be an admin? Some people do that, and they have also ran for administrators. But rather than being helpful or collaborative, they end up being annoying. And they have not been elected administrators, which is the funny thing. But well, may this RfA be successful or not, good luck Danny. --Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 04:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral: I agree with 1989 but on the other hand i also agree with QueerEcofeminist. -- CptViraj (📧) 13:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per A.Savin.--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, per Cuatro Remos. —Hasley 17:16, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose I believe the "mundane tasks" do not have a really large backlog and I rarely see you pop up at any of the AN's. In addition to what you've said below, "I don't plan to get involved in controversial deletions, license reviewing, or anything like that", I believe having some participation in LRs would be better as it shows that you have some basic knowledge of it. If you want to participate in it, I'd be more than happy to Symbol support vote.svg Support you. Regards -- (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Danny answered that. He would be more involved in blocks and protections, or B&Ps. Calvinkulit (talk) 06:51, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

@Calvinkulit: As said above, this is the part where the backlog isn't as huge as DRs, where Danny doesn't really participate in. Yes, blocks and protections are needed, but I believe that it is still within control by the current admins. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per A.Savin. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:49, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - "Administrators are experienced and trusted members of the Commons community." [1] . This user's first edit related to a DR request is 31 May 2019 (!!!). Further, echoing A. Savin, I have been an admin for more than 11 years and am routinely in the top 90% by activity, and have never seen or heard of this user. Accordingly, and especially with consideration of the above, I do not believe this user is sufficiently experienced or trusted (the latter a thing earned over time through continued demonstration, which is not on offer here.) Эlcobbola talk 14:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments

  • Does DannyS712 agree with this request? I would likely support his candidacy but not without knowing if he is actually willing to become an admin. Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
    Yes, I do; it came as a surprise, but I believe that I could use the tools to further this project. --DannyS712 (talk) 15:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • DannyS712, you've uploaded the cropped version of File:(1-18) Peugeot 206 CC (4350220440).jpg. What would you decide if this file were proposed for deletion as derivative work and you were the closing sysop? Thanks, --VLu (talk) 15:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
    Given my involvement with the file, I would likely recuse from closing the deletion discussion. However, I'll note that while the flickr image is tagged as CC-BY-2.0, the image content (the car) isn't necessarily licensed properly. Given the precautionary principle, and the fact that the file is unused, I would close the discussion in favor of deleting the image. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 16:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
    And what if the file were widely used? --VLu (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
    Then I would leave it to someone more experienced; I don't plan to get involved in controversial deletions, license reviewing, or anything like that. I would use the tools to help fight vandalism by applying protection or blocks as needed, by helping out at requests for rights, and other mundane admin tasks. I don't intend to dive into areas I am not familiar with, and if at any point I am unsure about something I'll leave it for someone else; I am a sysop on mediawiki, but commons is a much bigger site with a very different culture, and I will be aware of that as I (cautiously) use the tools. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 16:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • DannyS712 If you were appointed an admin, what do you see yourself using the tools for and where will you help out? Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
    @Gbawden: They answered that above. 1989 (talk) 06:37, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Lucas Werkmeister (interface administrator)

Vote

Lucas Werkmeister (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 21:28, (UTC)

I’m the author of the AC/DC gadget. It started out as a user script, but now that it’s a gadget, I can no longer edit it directly. I can use {{Edit request}} on MediaWiki talk:Gadget-ACDC.js, of course, but I figured asking for interface admin doesn’t hurt either :)

While Commons is not my main wiki, I do have some volume of contributions here that I hope doesn’t look too disagreeable. I’ve also written another tool that’s mainly useful for Commons (though, unlike AC/DC, isn’t exclusive to it): QuickCategories, a way to mass-edit categories that has already been used for over 300 000 edits according to Special:Tags. In my day job, I’m a software developer for Wikimedia Germany, so some code from me is already running here no matter how this request turns out ;)

My account is reasonably well-protected – on all the main computers where I’m logged into this account, either the home partition or the complete disk is encrypted, and once I get the the right I will of course enable 2FA (at the moment I’m not allowed to) I have two-factor authentication enabled. I might currently be logged in on a few other devices, but I can reset my password to terminate those sessions. The big question is my phone – I’m currently logged in there and it’s not particularly secure. How do other interface admins handle this? I could log out, but sometimes it’s useful to be able to see notifications there. (T153454 would help here, but doesn’t look like it will happen soon.)

Commons doesn’t seem to have partial blocks enabled (yet?) as far as I can tell, but otherwise I wouldn’t mind being blocked from editing particularly sensitive pages, e. g. common.js and gadgets that are enabled by default, since the main purpose of this request is just one gadget. (On the other hand, I’d be happy to help with development on other gadgets too.) --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 21:28, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Votes

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lucas Werkmeister is a trustworthy Wikimedian. — Envlh (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes he is. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Definitely the case, has earned it. Sadads (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As there appears to be a way around this besides giving you access to the entire interface. You have less than 3,000 edits here and no other advanced rights anywhere except the test wiki so I'm unable to even glean your ability to be trustworthy besides what I have in front of me. 3,000 edits is barely enough for regular adminship and in my opinion interface adminship is far more dangerous due to the ability to affect everyone from users to readers. I have no idea why Jean-Frédéric thought it would be ok to make your script into a gadget thereby locking you out of it but I don't feel like giving you access to the entirety of the interface to rectify that is the best course of action when there are alternatives. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
    Lucas Werkmeister (WMDE) is a Wikidata administrator.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
    Well, Wikidata Staff. That group is mostly equivalent to Administrator (and tbh I’m not sure if the differences are intentional or not – for example, Staff can’t manage tags), but I’m not supposed to exercise those rights most of the time. --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 15:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. 1989 (talk) 23:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support If you know what you do, you know what you do. And another categorizing 10.000 files here won't improve that knowledge. I have way more trust in Lucas than in some biased admins here with tens of thousands of edits. --Mirer (talk) 02:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
@Mirer: Could you explain how admins more experienced than you and this candidate is biased? Thanks. 1989 (talk) 03:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I trust Lucas. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lucas is probably the best person to be interface administrator; he maybe doesn't have much experience on Commons but he clearly have plenty of experience in interface. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:26, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per VIGNERON --DCB (talk) 09:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Envlh and Vigneron. Pymouss Let’s talk - 12:44, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, no problems--Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jianhui67 TC 04:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per my original suggestion. Sure, Lucas has not been a super-active user yet here on Commons, but the way I see it is: we have here a colleague primarily from another Wiki (Wikidata), technically-minded and highly competent, who has been developing tools for Wikimedia Commons. I see clear potential for Lucas to be involved in the maintenance and development of various gadgets and scripts. And overall, Lucas has long-demonstrated his trustworthiness and dedication to the Wikimedia projects, and I have no doubt he can be trusted with both using the advanced permissions and securing his account appropriately. Jean-Fred (talk) 07:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support of course, trusted user. Multichill (talk) 08:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:25, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. I think communicating first with original authors or other interface editors is better solution then partial pages protection. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support- FitIndia Talk Mail 16:02, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Per VIGNERON. Highly trusterd User. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support without any arguments. Masum Reza📞 17:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support User with proven technical competence on the work they want to do. 3K edits is reasonable at any sensible standard. – Ammarpad (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support They are here to help, undoubtedly. Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 04:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Of course. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 13:30, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments

  • If you are the maintainer wouldn't you be able to put this in your userspace and then have the MediaWiki page directed to that? --Majora (talk) 21:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Hm, are there other gadgets that do this? I’m not sure I like the sound of gadgets redirecting back into less-privileged space. --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 22:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
There really wouldn't be a difference. It would still allow you to make changes and we wouldn't be giving you access to the entire interface. Seems a little silly to be afraid of the consequences of having one script be redirected and not of giving you access to things that affect everyone down the the readers who don't even login. The only reason the script was even moved from your userspace to begin with was to make it easier for others to use it. --Majora (talk) 22:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
@Majora: I was thinking about this more from another perspective. If I was some other user who had never heard of this Lucas Werkmeister guy, and I noticed that this gadget just redirected to that user’s page, I might think something like, “who even is this guy? What gives him the right to edit a gadget, with no formal endorsement from the community beyond whoever set up the redirect?” That’s why I’m curious if any other gadgets do that already. --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have no idea why Jean-Frédéric thought it would be ok to make your script into a gadget thereby locking you out of it
    Hello there. I am not entirely sure how to interpret that comment − for clarity, I had discussed it with Lucas beforehand (I guess I could have made it clearer that it would only be editable by interface admins after that). Jean-Fred (talk) 08:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
    For further clarity, I’m definitely not mad at Jean-Fred :) I think on some level I was aware that I wouldn’t be able to edit the gadget version as easily, though it still caught me by surprise a bit when it happened. --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
  • I realized that being a sysop on testwiki/testcommonswiki (for testing purposes) allows me to enable 2FA already, so now I’ve done so :) --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
@Lucas Werkmeister: You could also ask for oauth-tester right on meta-wiki to be able to use 2FA. Masum Reza📞 20:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Requests for bureaucratship

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for CheckUser rights

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for Oversight rights

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Archives

You can find requests for adminship archives at Commons:Administrators/Archive.

Talìa macari