From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

LymaBot (talk · contribs)

Operator: Lymantria (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Categorizing.

Automatic or manually assisted: Automatic & supervised or sometimes manually assisted

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Occasionaly

Maximum edit rate (eg edits per minute): 30

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y

Programming language(s): AWB

Lymantria (talk) 11:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)


  • I think will be good idea to create source template and place category there. Also will be good idea to use links edit summaries. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
    • What do you mean by "links edit summaries"? Lymantria (talk) 14:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
      • I have done a tiny additional test run adding a source template rather than a category (and I had to run a correction run too). Lymantria (talk) 05:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
        Sorry, I missed in. New test run looks OK for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
-+Category:Images from PaDIL
++[[Category:Images from PaDIL]]

-- Rillke(q?) 17:42, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

What about


Would this be beneficial in case the links change in future (I don't had a deep look into the site so I can't say whether /Pest/Main is superfluous)? -- Rillke(q?) 17:47, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

If you really consider this an improvement, I can of course change that. But I am afraid that this splitting up the link does indeed make it a lot less user friendly for (non bot) uploaders. That is why I intentionally did not split it at first. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
I agree. Should be also easy to change the links later in case the site changes its structure. -- Rillke(q?) 14:22, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. I hope if necessary indeed it will be easy. Lymantria (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

If there are no objections, I think bot status should be granted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)