From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Pompidombot (talk · contribs)

Operator: Pompidom (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: It's the same as RudolphousBot (Commons:Bots/Requests/RudolphousBot), only I use AWB. This bot will help with categorising the images of Category:Possible Rijksmonumenten. So:

This bot will helping with:

  • adding Monumentid's to the photographs based on addresses / description
  • adding Categories to photographs based on monumentid / address / description

Just see the test edits.

Other things to know:

  • run before a bot on the Dutch Wikipedia with the same name.
  • admin on the Dutch Wikipedia.

Automatic or manually assisted:

  • Automatically

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run):

  • As long as work can be done on unidentified photo's

Maximum edit rate (eg edits per minute): 10

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y

Programming language(s): AWB.

Pompidom (talk) 21:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


  • I appreciate the help. Multichill (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Looks uncontroversial. Where does the id number data come from? Do you look this up manuallyt? --Dschwen (talk) 04:53, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
    • Yes, I'll program the number and category in AWB manaully and will run than the bot after a few test edits. Pompidom (talk) 07:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
      Is it possible to add Rijksmonumenten in location category at the same time? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
      Yes, it is possible. But the category which is added is an subcategory of Category:Rijksmonumenten in location. Because of the huge amount, I think it's better to keep the category Rijksmonumenten in location clean of those files. Pompidom (talk) 18:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Are there any other questions? Pompidom (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
    • Not from me. I'll grant the flag if there are no further comments today. --Dschwen (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Approved. --Dschwen (talk) 15:33, 16 January 2013 (UTC)