Commons:Candidatas a Imagens de qualidade

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 77% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Ir para as nomeações
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎日本語 • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎svenska
float

Estas são as candidatas a tornarem-se Imagens de qualidade. Por favor, fique claro que não é o mesmo que Imagens especiais. Além disso, se você deseja obter informações sobre as suas imagens, pode consegui-las em Críticas fotográficas.

Objectivo[edit]

O objectico das Imagens de qualidade é incentivar as pessoas que são a base do Commons, os utilizadores individuais que fornecem imagens para ampliar esta colecção. Enquanto que as imagens especiais são as melhores de todas as imagens carregadas no Commons, as Imagens de qualidade servem para identificar e encorajar os esforços dos utilizadores para carregar imagens de qualidade no Commons.
Além disso, as imagens de qualidade podem ser um local onde outros utilizadores expliquem métodos para melhorar uma imagem.

Orientações[edit]

Todas as imagens nomeadas devem ser trabalho próprio dos utilizadores do Commons

Para os nomeadores[edit]

Aqui estão as diretrizes gerais para Imagens de qualidade, Below e orientações gerais para Imagens de qualidade; e outras orientações mais detalhadas estão disponíveis em Diretrizes de imagens.

Requisitos das imagens[edit]

  1. Status de direitos autorais. As candidatas a Imagens de qualidade foram carregadas no Commons pelo proprietário dos direitos autorais sob uma licença adequada. Os requisitos completos de licença estão disponíveis em COM:CT
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
  4. Sem anúncios ou assinaturas na imagem. Os direitos de autor e informações de autoria devem ficar na página da imagem e podem estar nos metadados da imagem, mas não deve interferir no conteúdo da imagem.


Creator[edit]

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Requisitos técnicos[edit]

Critérios mais detalhados estão disponíveis em Diretrizes de imagens.

Resolução[edit]

As imagens do Commons podem ser usadas não só para visualizá-las no ecrã. Também podem ser usadas para impressão ou visualização em monitores de alta resolução. Não podemos prever quais dispositivos serão usados no futuro, por isso é importante que as imagens que são nomeadas tenham uma resolução razoavelmente alta. Normalmente o limite inferior é de 2 megapixels, mas para imagens 'fáceis de tomar', os revisores podem exigir muito mais.

Não se aplica a imagens SVG.

Qualidade das imagens[edit]

As imagens digitais estão sujeitas a vários problemas resultantes da captura e processamento da imagem, tais como ruídos, problemas com a compressão JPEG, falta de informação de zonas ou realces, ou problemas com a captura de cores. Todas estas questões devem ser tratadas adequadamente.

Composição e iluminação[edit]

A disposição do objecto principal de uma imagem deve contribuir para a própria imagem. Objectos em segundo plano não devem desviar a atenção. A iluminação e o foco também devem contribuir para o resultado global; o objecto principal tem de se destacar, ser completo e estar bem exposto.

Valor[edit]

Nosso principal objectivo é melhorar a qualidade das imagens que contribuem para o Wikicommons, algo valioso para os projectos da Wikimedia.

Como nomear[edit]

Basta adicionar uma linha deste formulário no topo da lista de candidatos da secção de Nomeações.

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição  --~~~~ |}}

A descrição deve ser não mais do que algumas palavras, e por favor deixe uma linha em branco entre sua nova entrada e as demais.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição  --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the Image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Number of nominations[edit]

A descrição deve ser não mais do que algumas palavras, e por favor deixe uma linha em branco entre sua nova entrada e as demais. A adição de mais de um par de imagens de uma só vez pode ser considerado flooding, o que é desaprovado.


Avaliando as imagens[edit]

Qualquer utilizador registado pode revisar um nomeação.
Quando um revisor avalia uma imagem deve considerar as mesmas diretrizes do nomeador.

Como revisar[edit]

Como actualizar o status

Examine cuidadosamente a imagem. Abre-a na resolução máxima, e veja se ela atende aos critérios de qualidade.

  • Se você decidir promover a nomeação, altere a linha relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição --~~~~ |}}

to

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Breve descrição --Assinatura do nomeador |Por que você gostou. --~~~~}}

Em outras palavras, altere a predefinição de /Nomination para /Promotion e adicione a sua assinatura, possivelmente com algum pequeno comentário.

  • Se você decidir rejeitar a nomeação, altere a linha relevante de
Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Breve descrição --~~~~ |}}

to

Image:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Breve descrição --Assinatura do nomeador |Por que você não gostou --~~~~}}

Em outras palavras, altere a predefinição de /Nomination para /Decline e adicione a sua assinatura, possivelmente declarando os critérios pelos quais a imagem fracassou (podes usar os títulos das secções de diretrizes). Se houver muitos problemas, notifique os 2 ou 3 mais graves, ou adicione múltiplos problemas. Ao rejeitar uma nomeação, por favor, explique as razões na página de discussão do nomeador - em regra, seja agradável e estimulante! Na mensagem, você deve dar uma explicação mais detalhada de sua decisão.

Nota: Por favor, avalie primeiramente as imagens mais antigas.


Período de tolerância e promoção[edit]

Se não houver objecções no período de 2 dias (exactamente 48 horas) desde a sua revisão, a imagem será promovida ou rejeitada, de acordo com a revisão que recebeu. Se você possuir objecções, mova a imagem para a secção Consensual review.

Como executar uma decisão[edit]

QICbot trabalha automaticamente nisso 2 dias depois de a decisão ter sido tomada, e as imagens promovidas são armazenadas em Promovidas recentemente à espera de categorização e inserção automática em uma página apropriada das Imagens de qualidade.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • As imagens que esperam uma revisão são mostradas em uma caixa azul
  • As imagens que o revisor aceitou são mostradas em uma caixa verde
  • As imagens que o revisor rejeitou são mostradas em uma caixa vermelha

Imagens não avaliadas (quadro azul)[edit]

As imagens nomeadas que não foram promovidas nem rejeitadas, ou que acabaram em consenso (que haja um número igual de oposições e apoios) após 8 dias nesta página devem ser removidas desta página sem promoção, armazenadas em Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives julho 2015 e a categoria Unassessed QI candidates acrescentada à imagem.

Processo de revisão de consenso[edit]

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

Como pedir uma revisão consensual[edit]

Para pedir uma revisão consensual, basta alterar /Promotion ou /Decline para /Discuss, e adicionar o seu comentário imediatamente após a revisão. Um bot automático irá movê-lo para a secção de revisão consensual dentro de um dia.

Por favor, somente envie coisas para a revisão consensual que foram revisadas como promovidas/rejeitadas. Se, como revisor, você não pode tomar uma decisão, adicione seu comentário, mas deixe o candidato nesta página.

Regras de revisão consensual[edit]

Veja Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules.

Actualização da página: purge this page's cache

Contents

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 00h34min, 7 julho 2015 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

July 06, 2015[edit]

July 05, 2015[edit]

July 04, 2015[edit]

July 03, 2015[edit]

July 02, 2015[edit]

July 01, 2015[edit]

June 30, 2015[edit]

June 29, 2015[edit]

June 28, 2015[edit]

June 27, 2015[edit]

June 26, 2015[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File:Βασιλική του Αγίου Μάρκου 9276.jpg[edit]

Βασιλική του Αγίου Μάρκου 9276.jpg

  • Nomeação Saint Mark's basilica, Heraklion. --C messier 16:42, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose JPG Artifacts in sky --Xicotencatl 19:03, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I wish for a discussion before I try to correct it (it's caused by noise reduction, they are not jpeg artifacts). --C messier 05:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK, but you should not need noise reduction for day sky. Why are you shooting ISO 400 in the middle of the day? --Xicotencatl 17:45, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Forgot it, I was indoors before. --C messier 21:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl (talk) 06:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Palacio_de_Nymphenburg,_Múnich,_Alemania,_2015-07-03,_DD_01-18_HDR_PAN.JPG[edit]

Palacio de Nymphenburg, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-03, DD 01-18 HDR PAN.JPG

  • Nomeação Nymphenburg Palace, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 10:06, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support GQ --Palauenc05 11:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg I like this mood :) --Laitche 11:34, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
    FP-worthy? Poco a poco 14:25, 4 July 2015 (UTC)* Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don´t think that may be FP, there are too many blurred objects, due to the long exposure time. I´m even not sure, if this is even QI. We should discuss it. BTW: as Laitche, the mood is exceptional! --Hubertl 20:38, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don't know how this picture can be moved to CR due to "motion blur". It has 117 megapixels, and the issue brought up is maybe covering and area of 0,5% of it, this is to me negligible, since those animals are not the main subject of the picture. To solve your concern I should have taken 10 long exposure photographs of each frame to get rid of everything moving, but the light would be changing, not a real option. I am really curious about what others say here. Poco a poco 08:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Answer: I am fully aware of the complexity making panoramas like this. Maybe it was 20 minutes too late to have enough light (without loosing the colors), if there is a "static" motion blur with wind in the trees, it would be ok IMO. Please don´t take it personal, the image is in the same deciding position as it was befor Palaunc give his pro. And there are a lot of other collegues who can decide. This picture (and the making) is worth, to talk about. --Hubertl 11:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Poco a poco: I am not sure this pano is FP-worthy or not but in my opinion, this photo should be discussed on FPC not here, if needs discussion. --Laitche 19:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 05:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

File:USO-ASR_-_20141108_-_Olivier_Missoup.jpg[edit]

USO-ASR - 20141108 - Olivier Missoup.jpg

  • Nomeação USO-ASR - 20141108 - Olivier Missoup --Pleclown 10:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Any chance of reducing the noise a little?Crisco 1492 14:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  •  Not done --Hubertl 08:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry I'm late, tried a new version --Pleclown 10:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for me ok now. What about you, Crisco 1492? --Hubertl 15:03, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support now. It seems Crisco 1492 is very busy in RL. :) Jkadavoor 02:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jkadavoor 02:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Берег_Весны.jpg[edit]

Берег Весны.jpg

  • Nomeação Sayan Mountains, Yenisei river. By User:Александр Лещёнок. --ViseMoD 20:53, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Xicotencatl 21:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: Artefacts in the sky. --Cccefalon 03:50, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cccefalon, and not only in the sky. --Kadellar 09:42, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • What do you expect from in-camera jpeg? --ViseMoD 07:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I expect people to shoot RAW if possible, and it's the case here. We are looking for Quality images, we don't mind the brand or the model, but obviously some cameras just can't give you enough quality (and the EM1 of course can, just shoot RAW). Btw, please write the name of the author in the nominations. --Kadellar 14:07, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 07:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Cynthia Barcomi Wikipedia.jpg[edit]

Cynthia Barcomi Wikipedia.jpg

  • Nomeação Cynthia Barcomi --Denis Apel 13:22, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Rejeição
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but the image is too bright. -- Spurzem 14:48, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Nothing burnt, easily fixable. Maybe acceptable as it is. Please discuss. --C messier 12:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hand crop in this kind of portrait not acceptable. --Cccefalon 04:29, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I withdraw my support, Cccefalon, is right about the bad crop. --C messier 14:35, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry too bad framing.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --Hubertl 06:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Tournoi_de_rugby_à_7_-_20141012_-_Genève_-_20.jpg[edit]

Tournoi de rugby à 7 - 20141012 - Genève - 20.jpg

  • Nomeação Tournoi de rugby à 7 - 20141012 - Genève --Pleclown 10:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IMO too much empty space at the right.--XRay 16:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC) Not done

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Hubertl 08:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I disagree, IMHO composition is acceptable as it is. --C messier 10:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose  Not done --Livioandronico2013 16:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support "Too much empty space at the right"? Do you want them get crashed on the edge? Let the poor people breath. (no problem in cropping a bit from bottom though. Jkadavoor 05:49, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
  • But the trahscan at the right could be cropped out ... --XRay 12:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Fair enough. It can be cropped or cloned out. :) Jkadavoor 12:45, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Σύνοδος Αφροδίτης Δία 2015 9594.jpg[edit]

Σύνοδος Αφροδίτης Δία 2015 9594.jpg

  • Nomeação Venus-Jupiter conjunction, 30.7 June 2015. --C messier 10:50, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry,noisy and shake --Livioandronico2013 17:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment what you mean with shake is just the normal move of stars during a long time exposure (2.5sec). --Hubertl 18:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Jupiter and the satellites are double!?!
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Σπάρτακος 19:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Douple? I can see one Venus, one Jupiter (although, a bit elogated due to the relative movement of the sky - remember Galileo) and three satellites. Also, I can do some more denoising, around the planets. --C messier 10:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
    • I used tripod and 6 s delay to avoid any shake. --C messier 10:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
      • If the subject are the planets you have to use a motor drive, it's like a motorcycle you have to follow --Livioandronico2013 11:33, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
      • But here there is no motion blur. Only a light pathway. --C messier 12:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
        • But discuss it as well? this thing for you is quality? two planets blurred and moved? are you kidding me ???--Livioandronico2013 13:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 12:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As Livioandronico. If you want to take a picture of the galilean satellites of jupiter you cant do this with a stationary tripod, you should use a motorized equatorial mount. --Dirtsc 10:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 12:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Core_Banks_-_fence_-_02.JPG[edit]

Core Banks - fence - 02.JPG

  • Nomeação Sand dune stabilization fence near Long Point Cabins at North Core Banks, North Carolina. By User:Jarekt --Jarekt 13:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks like a random composition. I understand the idea, but I think the achievement is not good enough (Unfortunate crops). The rest (light, sharpness etc... is good. I oppose, but I wish other opinions, I think a discussion could be interesting.--Jebulon 15:35, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Symbol support vote.svg Support The quality is ok and this is the key criteria. I regard the fence and its wave shaped shadow on a grey sandy background as the main elements of the composition, which I would not qualify as random.--CHK46 16:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think it´s worth to discuss it. --Hubertl 17:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think it succeeded to explain the topic sand dune stabilization so not a fully random composition. Crop: It looks unfortunate on top; but there will be a cut as the fence is long. Jkadavoor 05:59, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Jkadavoor 05:59, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

File:10818 Λιθουανία 4Χ400 γυναικών.JPG[edit]

10818 Λιθουανία 4Χ400 γυναικών.JPG

  • Nomeação The Lithuanian team at 4x400 women's relay at 2015 European Team Championships First League. --C messier 16:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Opposesorry,too much noisy --Livioandronico2013 17:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the noise is acceptable here. At least, it needs a discussion, please.--Jebulon 21:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Jebulon Je comprends que cela est votre ami, mais sommes sérieux ...--Livioandronico2013 18:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I don't understand when you try to write in "french", please explain your meaning in another language.--Jebulon 20:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much noise, lack of details --Σπάρτακος 19:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. A bit noisy but a good photo, nice, sharp enough, good colors -- Spurzem 13:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Imo it's not noise, it's quite big compression artifacts. --Kadellar 09:47, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Spurzem --Palauenc05 14:39, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


File:Lestes elatus female in Kadavoor.jpg[edit]

Lestes elatus female in Kadavoor.jpg

  • Nomeação Lestes elatus, female --Jkadavoor 02:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent --Moroder 20:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but it is not sharp enough and too noisy. For me not QI. --Hockei 14:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Hockei --Σπάρτακος 19:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Moroder --Palauenc05 14:37, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 06:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


File:Двухэтажка.jpg[edit]

Двухэтажка.jpg

  • Nomeação Canyon of the Tsitse river in Caucasian Biosphere Reserve, Russia. By User:Synaps-s --Ilya 11:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Rejeição
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hubertl 11:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I could agree, but for an easy to take landscape photo, this is much too small resolution imo. --Cccefalon 15:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
    @Cccefalon: higher resolution uploaded --Antanana 21:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
    It is significantly overprocessed. Please have a look at the mountain ridges, for example. --Cccefalon 09:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality, IMHO.--Sergei Kazantsev 08:49, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unsharp and oversharpened, sadly the higher resolution isn't any better than the previous version --A.Savin 12:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
    @A.Savin:You are right, the previous version was better.--KSK (talk) 10:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hans Haase 11:17, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with A. Savin in full resolution the current version shows lots of artifacts. --C messier 14:37, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice mood, but image is overprocessed. --Iifar 17:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Symbol declined.svg Declined   --Hubertl 06:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File: Laacher See, Ostufer (2008-12-28).jpg[edit]

Laacher See, Ostufer (2008-12-28).jpg

  • Nomeação Laach Lake. It is a volcanic caldera lake in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, about 24 km (15 mi) northwest of Koblenz and 37 km (23 mi) south of Bonn -- Spurzem 18:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Promoção
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice and moodful image. But according to QI criteria I have to deny it: Burnt hightlights and a lot of pure black. Probably a fill flash had compensate the high contrast situation. English description is missing on the file description page. --Tuxyso 18:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK. So unterschiedlich sind die Auffassungen von guten und grottenschlechten Bildern. Außerdem: Seit wann ist eine englische Beschreibung beim Bild vorgeschrieben? -- Spurzem 19:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sie ist nicht vorgeschrieben, nur wenn du dir schon die Mühe machst und das Bild hier auf Englisch beschreibst, ist es im Sinne von Commons als Medienarchiv nur sinnvoll die Beschreibung auch auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite zu integrieren. Ich habe ja geschrieben, dass ich das Bild sehr schön und stimmungsvoll finde, den QI-Kriterien genügt es aber dennoch nicht. Setze einfach auf Discuss, um weitere Meinungen einzuholen. --Tuxyso 18:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for me it´s QI. --Hubertl 02:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Hubertl --Palauenc05 11:38, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Symbol support vote.svg Promoted   --Hubertl 06:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Shiva_temple_at_Puthia_01.JPG[edit]

Shiva temple at Puthia 01.JPG

  • Nomeação The Bhubaneshwar Shiva Temple of Puthia is the largest Shiva temple in Bangladesh. It was built in 1823 by Rani Bhubonmoyee Devi. --Tanweer Morshed 18:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Revisão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 05:58, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: Artefacts in the sky. --Cccefalon 19:09, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, good quality picture! --Hans Haase 15:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose With an additional review, it´s not QI. Its too unsharp, blurry and too, artefacts in the sky --Hubertl 10:36, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Out of date clock icon 2.svg Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 06:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Bara_Ahnik_Mandir_at_Puthia.JPG[edit]

Bara Ahnik Mandir at Puthia.JPG

  • Nomeação Bara Ahnik Mandir at Puthia, constructed by the Char Ani Rajas of Puthia estate. --Tanweer Morshed 18:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Revisão
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 06:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree: Magenta CA in the trees and loss of fine details. Never a QI! --Cccefalon 19:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hans Haase 11:25, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strong chromatic aberration on the right side and lack of fine detail. --Iifar 17:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Out of date clock icon 2.svg Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 06:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Nico_Rosberg_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Nico Rosberg 2010 Malaysia 2nd Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomeação Nico_Rosberg_2010_Malaysia_2nd_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Revisão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's too tight IMHO, it needs lead room. If the uploader has kept the original it can be easily fixed. --C messier 11:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --Iifar 15:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Spurzem. --Palauenc05 14:33, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Out of date clock icon 2.svg Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 06:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Mark_Webber_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice.jpg[edit]

Mark Webber 2010 Malaysia 1st Free Practice.jpg

  • Nomeação Mark_Webber_2010_Malaysia_1st_Free_Practice. By User:Morio --Σπάρτακος 15:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Revisão
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. And: Is it a downhill race? (no need to present it with an angle) --Cccefalon 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with Spurzem,also is a tight crop is excellent (for F1....this car go on 300 km/h!) and the first curve in Sepang is down --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop, the spoiler is barely within frame. Easily fixable if the uploader has kept the original. --C messier 11:20, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --Iifar 15:35, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Spurzem --Palauenc05 14:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Out of date clock icon 2.svg Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 06:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Tabela de tempo (8 dias após a nomeação)[edit]

seg 29 jun. → ter 07 jul.
ter 30 jun. → qua 08 jul.
qua 01 jul. → qui 09 jul.
qui 02 jul. → sex 10 jul.
sex 03 jul. → sáb 11 jul.
sáb 04 jul. → dom 12 jul.
dom 05 jul. → seg 13 jul.
seg 06 jul. → ter 14 jul.
ter 07 jul. → qua 15 jul.