Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:CID Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.

Formalidades[edit]

Nominación[edit]

Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas, entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.

Crear una nueva nominación[edit]

Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.


Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.

Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}

Para votar[edit]

Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question).

Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.

Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.

Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.

Reglas[edit]

  • Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
  • Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
  • Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
  • Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
  • Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.

La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:

  • estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
  • que haya un mínimo de cinco votos a favor
  • que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)

Contents


Recarga para nuevas nominaciones: purge this page's cache

Propuestas[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Hotel 3 Nagas with old red Citroen at blue hour in Luang Prabang.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2018 at 01:42:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hotel 3 Nagas with old red Citroen at blue hour in Luang Prabang

File:Ranularia sarcostoma 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2018 at 00:13:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ranularia sarcostoma

File:Cantina Hussong in Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2018 at 17:36:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Oh yes! So a late night indoors grainy photo, but who cares! Guys, this is art. The crowd in the photo emulates the painting in the background and it brings to mind all those murals in Los Angeles of celebrities like [1] or even paintings in the style of Nighthawks. I just love it! I also see that Ensenada is still as swinging as when I was there back in the 70s. :) --Cart (talk) 18:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support absolutely per Cart --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:55, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ezarateesteban 00:37, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Ciudad del Cabo desde Cabeza de León, Sudáfrica, 2018-07-22, DD 20-23 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2018 at 13:51:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Cape Town viewed from Lion's Head, South Africa

File:Dülmen, Dülmener Sommer, Open-Air-Konzert -- 2018 -- 9316-18.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2018 at 13:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Preparations for the open-air concert of the Dülmen Summer at Wiesmann Sports Cars, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 13:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 13:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info For your information: It isn't monochrom. It's a tone-mapped HDRI with a algorithm for a realistic illustration, the building is illuminated inside with different color. --XRay talk 17:06, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support dramatic "monochrome". Plus yellow. Works --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:01, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
BTW: It is natural, not colorkey. So it looks like monochrom, but it isn't. --XRay talk 17:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Oops, I did not intend to imply that. It's obvious that the image is not really monochrome: there's shades of red in the sky, a red traffic sign, the blueish roof, etc. Face-smile.svg --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:27, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks sort of ... alien. :) --Cart (talk) 18:57, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Impressive. Do you have a few pixels left on the far right? A small piece of the wood construction seems to be missing. --Milseburg (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very impressive. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:32, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 02:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Gamebird (27147095490).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2018 at 09:40:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Narrowboat Gamebird
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tim Green on Flickr - uploaded by INeverCry - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose While it is a pleasant landscape photo, I think the sharpness and technical quality of it is below what I would like in an FP. The gray plastic storm cover also looks rather ugly as a main feature in a photo of a nice traditional canal boat. --Cart (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Very gray, composition not IMO great. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Daikanransha.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2018 at 20:36:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail of Daikanransha, Ferris wheel in Odaiba, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz -- Gzzz zz 20:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Gzzz zz 20:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support You have to wonder what's going on with No 8. :) --Cart (talk) 21:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
    • You're right ! I had seen the curtain, but not the bloody hand marks ! Gzzz zz 21:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • There's another crazy car in this photo of the wheel. Intriguing. :) --Cart (talk) 21:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • It's just a full glazed (and air conditioned !) car. There are 4 of that kind on the wheel and the ride is more expensive ! Gzzz zz 22:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

File:ET Amhara asv2018-02 img068 Lake Tana at Bahir Dar.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2018 at 14:54:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two hippos at Lake Tana

File:Sailor directs an EA-18G during snow storm in Japan (8367035559).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2018 at 11:15:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:PAL118773 Basis Joigny.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2018 at 08:01:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Joigny and the banks of the Yonne river, France
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Robert Palomba - uploaded by Locaboat holidays - nominated by Dmottl -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 08:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 08:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not sure about the policy here. This and a bunch of other photos of these boats seems to have been uploaded by the boat company, perhaps to get some publicity. At the very least the user name Locaboat holidays, is not according to COM:UPOL#Inappropriate usernames since it is a company name. --Cart (talk) 09:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not really wowed by this; the light is fairly ordinary and it just looks like a normal tourist shot someone took while walking along the marina. Nothing spectacular.--Peulle (talk) 11:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree. And the town is a lot more interesting and a lot prettier than the boats. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because while I actually like the image, the metadata attributes the copyright not to the company that uploaded it but the photographer it hired. I don't know how this work for hire thing works in France but there is enough doubt here as to whether this is truly a free image. Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

File:University Of Oxford The Bridge Of Sighs.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2018 at 18:43:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

University Of Oxford The Bridge Of Sighs

File:Brügge (B), St.-Salvator-Kathedrale -- 2018 -- 8559.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2018 at 15:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Salvator's Cathedral, Brügge, Belgium
  • ✓ Done Sorry, forgotten. I just added the information. It's the ceiling over the altar. --XRay talk 05:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Boy plowing with a tractor at sunset in Don Det, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2018 at 02:41:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boy plowing at sunset with a tractor
Well, as they say in Manchester, there's the team everybody there supports, and then there's those bastards in red. Face-smile.svg Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
COYS! :D--Peulle (talk) 13:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
support your local team! Face-smile.svgMartin Falbisoner (talk) 07:26, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Grutte Griene, eiland in het natuurreservaat “Sneekermeer”. (d.j.b.) 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2018 at 17:38:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects Windmill.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Maybe this picture is too simple for FP. It is a simple metal mill which dominates the water level of Grutte Griene, island in the nature reserve "Sneekermeer". I personally like this picture because of its simplicity. All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 01:57, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, not enough wow for me.--Peulle (talk) 12:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ezarateesteban 17:21, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 18:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Good QI but doesn't do enough for me for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 07:41, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Alternative, another version[edit]

Grutte Griene, eiland in het natuurreservaat “Sneekermeer”. (d.j.b.) 05.jpg

File:Alligator mississippiensis - Loro Parque 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2018 at 13:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alligator mississippiensis (Daudin, 1802) (American alligator), Loro Parque, Tenerife
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:04, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 13:04, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I saw this in small size and really liked it, but looking at the full size there are just too many artefacts for me to go along with it as an FP, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 13:35, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I made a completely new version from RAW, I think, it is better now --Llez (talk) 15:45, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is, actually. :) --Peulle (talk) 19:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Siem Reap, Victory Gate.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2018 at 21:50:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Angkor Thom, South gate
  • ✓ Done centered shot without any vehicles in the background, thank you for your advice. Regards.--Pierre André (talk) 19:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Washed-out sky, lots of purple fringing and generally static composition. I know it wasn't taken with a DP/S but it reminds me of so many of my earlier pictures for Wikimedia when I used one. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

File:EstatuasIglesiaSanFrancisco-Jujuy.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2018 at 21:40:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Redone Ezarateesteban 22:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I enjoy this composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Asymmetrical off-center composition with unfortunate lighting conditions (daylight + different lamps). Please try again if you have the opportunity. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 15:14, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Christoph; looks tilted as well. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

File:PIA07763 Rhea full globe5.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2018 at 08:10:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cassini mosaic of Saturn's moon Rhea
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The bottom doesn't look fixed to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Try to make a little bit darker instead of fixing borders. --The NMI User (talk) 10:11, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Why are you avoiding fixing the borders? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks Rhea-lly good now Face-smile.svg. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Kalifornischer Seeloewe Zalophus californianus Tierpark Hellabrunn-4.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2018 at 07:30:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female California sea lion and her pup

File:Detail of the Central Branch of Greater Victoria Public Library, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2018 at 04:34:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Canada
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. I like the play of the sun and shadows here together with the reflection of unusual construction of the glass roof. -- Podzemnik (talk) 04:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. I was making a similar comment before reading the line above -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support truly excellent --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 14:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice rule of thirds execution. Interesting use of shadows, highlights, reflections and structure in a single shot. Well done. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 15:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Martin -- P999 (talk) 16:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Really interesting to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Dirty glasses, muddy reflections. I don't see anything interesting. Not the FP for me. --KSK (talk) 04:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The image seems to be finding some order it cannot explain to us in its chaotic rectilinearity. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Col dala Pieres Puez Mont de Sëura Cir Sela da Stevia te Gherdëina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2018 at 03:33:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Col dala Pieres peak, Mont de Sëura, The Chedul valley, Pizes de Cir and the Sella group with the Steviola mountain up front in the Puez-Geisler Nature Park in Val Gardena in the Dolomites - South Tyrol

File:Granite cliff with feldspar crystals in Loddebo 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2018 at 20:09:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Granite cliff with feldspar crystals in Loddebo
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Sweden
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info For some strange reason I think the portrait orientation creates more drama here than landscape. At first I wasn't too happy about the old handrail, but then I realized it provides size reference. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 20:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cart (talk) 20:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This one works really well. Patterns, lines, clouds, colours. Very well done! --Code (talk) 21:29, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Very good subject, but I demur on the composition, as I don't think the sky is helping. Either a purely blue sky or a sky with something going on in the upper left corner would probably help the composition more, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Crispy. Good light and colors. I also like the composition with the clouds. Positive impression at first sight with the thumbnail, then confirmed at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:47, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Code -- P999 (talk) 20:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Basile Poco2 19:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A nice juxtaposition of the orange granite and the cool blue sky. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:27, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Ледяные парусники.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2018 at 10:40:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Before sunrise on Lake Baikal
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Discoverynn - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 10:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KSK (talk) 10:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Resolution could be better, but very nice composition. --XRay talk 11:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Resolution is too low for me; 6 megapixels from a 36MP camera. Images should not be downsized and I can't see a good reason why this one should be. There's also the adage that "all sunsets are beautiful", so while this is a pretty picture in itself, there are so many pretty sunsets on Commons that an FP must give us something extra special. This doesn't, since it's so small.--Peulle (talk) 11:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Peulle and others. The full size is uploaded. 34 megapixels are enough? Please, look at the bigger size. --KSK (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Still not quite sure. I'll go with Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral.--Peulle (talk) 14:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle. It's a very nice idea but the execution of it plus processing could be better. --Cart (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per XRay, but mostly per Peulle. Gerifalte Del Sabana 23:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle --The NMI User (talk) 08:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose per others; it's a great image that unfortunately falls apart technically at the edges. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love Baikal lake. - Benh (talk) 06:38, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good size now but it still doesn't wow me. Btw, it looks tilted to me. Ok, we have no real horizon, but the opposite shoreline is far enough to be used as level gauge. --Cart (talk) 09:33, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
    ✓ Done--KSK (talk) 12:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • KSK, I Symbol support vote.svg Support, conditional on your fixing one dust spot that's on the right in the sky a bit above the lake. Otherwise, the photo with the ice forms is beautiful and special. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A lot of wow, and good quality. Yann (talk) 13:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The motif is outstanding, but die technical quality is below FP requirement, I guess especially regarding the loss of sharpness towards the edges. --Milseburg (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good work.--Naturephotographers (talk) 17:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Rathaus der Stadt Wanfried, Hessen, Deutschland IMG 5932-1 edit.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2018 at 16:36:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wanfried town hall.

Alternative image File:Rathaus der Stadt Wanfried, Hessen, Deutschland IMG 5922-1 edit.jpg[edit]

Wanfried town hall.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info @Basotxerri, Peulle: Here you go.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christoph Braun (talk) 20:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral OK, the technical quality is better now. --Basotxerri (talk) 08:28, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very pleasant --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:52, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The NMI User (talk) 09:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Not a great composition, IMO, though the motif is nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It still doesn't quite give me the wow feeling. Cleanup of the purple CA might also be a suggestion.--Peulle (talk) 20:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral My first thought was, wow, those must be really big rats Face-smile.svg. However, I've noticed that in other pictures of these buildings the half-timbering is red, almost scarlet, whereas here they seem more like red velvet cake. Is this something that could be addressed? Daniel Case (talk) 23:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Most of the images you'll find online are dated and the paint is not as saturated as it used to be. Although the lighting might be a more decisive factor. The timberframing will look entirely different on an overcast day. For this particular image, I wouldn't consider nudging the colors though. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 14:59, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Etangs de Bassies.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2018 at 09:13:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Étangs de Bassiès in commune of Auzat, Ariège, France

File:Obernberger See -BT- 09.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2018 at 08:39:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Colour gradient of green water at Obernberger See. Obernberg am Brenner, Tyrol, Austria
  • No problem, thank you for your opinion! --Basotxerri (talk) 14:32, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hmmmm --Podzemnik (talk) 17:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it. The sharpness could be better. --XRay talk 11:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Artistic. This aquatic blue and green vegetation is unusual and behind some trees it makes the composition successful in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Basile -- P999 (talk) 18:13, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 20:19, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 20:38, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The NMI User (talk) 09:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Very weak oppose An interesting idea that I don't think quite works. The trees are complex enough to be distracting, and the highlights near the bottom are almost blown. Daniel Case (talk) 18:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you Daniel. This might have been a nice application for a polarizer to get rid of the reflections, I think. --Basotxerri (talk) 07:14, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

File:IglesiaConsolación-puertaprincipal-00903.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2018 at 22:45:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me --Ezarateesteban 22:45, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:45, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Since this hasn't gotten any !votes yet, I will venture to suggest that there's a featurable image still to be found here. First, the slight pincushion distortion needs to be corrected. Second, I think it would do better with the walls, and possibly even the trim above, cropped out, to leave just a square picture of the doors themselves.Symbol support vote.svg Support now. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Look now, Daniel. thanks!!! Ezarateesteban 12:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - That did it. Very satisfying picture, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Parque estatal Chugach, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 109-121 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2018 at 18:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

360 degrees panorama in the Chugach State Park, Alaska, United States
  • Yes, that was a stitching issue, Peulle, the only one I actually saw and fixed, just forgot to upload the corrected version, which just happened, thanks. --Poco2 20:51, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Fix confirmed. Symbol support vote.svg Support now, it's an impressive view.--Peulle (talk) 22:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not particularly beautiful nor interesting in my view. The light is also too hard -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support That's a no-brainer support. :) ― Gerifalte Del Sabana 12:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Blown clouds are distracting, per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
    Daniel, I've reworked the curves and reduced the highlights but in a 360 degrees pano the sun will have to be somewhere. --Poco2 07:36, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I propose to cut off the (about) upper third just above the top of the dense clouds at the left. So you get rid of the parts of the overexposed region with the sun and it remains just enough sky --Llez (talk) 12:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:10, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Polinices aurantius 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2018 at 15:26:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Golden Moon Snail, Polinices aurantius joppensis from the Philippines
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:26, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 15:26, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Right now you're probably thinking: "What? He's voting against one of Llez' shell pics? Is that even possible?" I know, I usually support these too, so let me explain my reasoning. It's simple, really. It's the shells. Their colours are fairly uniform, just a slight variation between light yellow and white, not with some of the exciting stripes or patterns we have become used to seeing in these nominations. As such, they are less exciting. Less impressive, less "wow-y" than the photos I've become accustomed to seeing. That's all.--Peulle (talk) 15:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment To make photos of such uniform shells (without overexposing) and showing however all details is much more difficult than a photo of shell with various different colours and "with some of the exciting stripes or patterns". --Llez (talk) 20:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Sure, but there's a problem with inflation; so many great shell pics raises the standard since I get used to seeing better ones.--Peulle (talk) 20:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Each shell is a masterpiece of nature. I do not dare to differentiate between better and worse shells. In my opinion they all are aestetic, independent the colour and shape they have. Just such shells as the shell above are a challenge for photographers. --Llez (talk) 20:51, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great job...your shells will never detach me --Σπάρτακος (talk) 23:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 23:59, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 01:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMartin Falbisoner (talk) 08:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 16:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 17:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm sorry but I must agree with Peulle (and I have, I think, !voted against one of these other collections—can't remember which). It is not to say that Llez shouldn't have taken it, or even nominated it; it is certainly an image we should have on Commons, and possibly even a QI. But Peulle is right that the nature of these shells makes it difficult to get out of them much of what has made other shell sets featurable—ironically, to me, that is in part because so much care was taken in photographing them. Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Only a Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question: "...shell sets featurable...".Do we feature shells or do we feature pictures? Do we have featured picture candidates or featured shell candidates? --Llez (talk) 05:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • The subject is of course relevant. A photo can be technically excellent, but if the subject doesn't wow people, there's still a chance they won't vote for it in FPC. --Peulle (talk) 12:07, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

File:20171128 Angkor Wat 5671 DxO.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2018 at 07:25:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the central structure of Angkor Wat
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Cambodia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by User:Jakubhal - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I expect this nomination to be controversial, so hear me out. We constantly hear pleas to pretend in photography that we aren't living in the 21st century, requiring photos to have no cars and even no people in them. And the question to me in regard to a tremendous tourist attraction like Angkor Wat isn't whether it's unrealistic to require that all photos of it include no people, either by arriving when it's closed or cloning them all out; it's whether the people actually make the photo less than excellent. And in this case, I submit to you that we have an excellent view of the most famous part of Angkor Wat, with two women in the center adding a splash of color and a welcome structural element (though not an ancient one) and some more people elsewhere being somewhat less obtrusive parts of the scene. Call it a juxtaposition of the digital age and an ancient temple complex if you like, but I think this photo is very good and deserves a feature (though I'd be sympathetic to changing the description to "View of the central structure of Angkor Wat with two women"). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:57, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:13, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:30, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 17:39, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree and disagree with Ikan, so here comes the controversy... Agree that the description, and also the 3 categories, are not describing well the content. There are people on the picture, and these people in the center dressed with colorful clothes and mirroring in the water should obviously be mentioned somewhere in the file page. Otherwise, the subject is nearly wrong. Imagine the picture without these two women, it would have been completely different. The picture is only 62% from its original size, either cropped or downsized. Concerning the composition, there is too much sky compared to the bottom crop, and horizontally the main tower could have been positioned in the middle, so that the tourists visible on the left would have disappeared, and the temple would have stand much better within the composition. I agree that Siem Reap is usually crowded, and that such pictures with no tourist might be difficult to make, however, if you really want the buildings only, then you have 2 solutions : 1) patience, waiting until the place gets free 2) technique, taking two photographs with a tripod and clone out the intrusive elements in each after shooting. Then now the picture should be considered as it is : temple with tourists taking photographs of themselves. Is the action great ? Not really. Maybe a Buddhist monk walking, or a local child jumping would have made this image awesome, but here it rather shows the spectacle we have not paid for when purchasing the 37 US$ entrance ticket. I don't agree that the 21st century may justify weak sceneries with distracting elements as a modern way of life. There certainly are impressive architectural constructions with similar water reflection in non-touristic places, just you need to search and find. Here the photographer didn't search, as the attraction was perfectly located on the map, Angkor Wat being the major touristic site in Cambodia. Then, to make an exceptional picture of such classic destinations, you really have to find the special element or the particular situation that will make your shot original -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • I respect you for taking the time to think about all of that and write it down. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Always a pleasure to converse with you, even if we sometimes disagree -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:15, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • My pleasure, too. I think this is a very good photo, but if it doesn't get the votes for FP, the reasons you mention could be considered the difference between a good and a great picture. I'll see whether more people pass judgment on it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • It's a good picture, yes, and bad also. I can't imagine this image in a guide book for example, it's too far from the tradition and local culture -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Basile Morin, I have selected that picture among a dozen other, exactly because of the woman in red dress. The photo with that pair just looked more interesting than other more usual shots of Angkor Watt central structure. It is a pity I could not make a photo of rural life with Angkor in background but I think it is no longer possible. At least for an outsider who can enter the area only during a day. The place is overcrowded by tourists. I believe scene as you describe, showing local culture, may be now possible only if someone close the area and intentionally arrange it there. Sorry -- Jakubhal 19:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Yes, this place is "overcrowded by tourists", especially between November and February, during the dry season with mild temperatures. But here there are 2 problems with them : 1) they are highly visible in the center, while the description of the image is "View of the central structure of Angkor Wat" only, and no ladies. 2) These women are taking pictures like pure tourists, and this action is particularly incompatible with the magic. Never will you find such pictures in a gallery, otherwise we would ask the photographer "hey, are you doing art or just snapshots in touristic sites with your mobile phone like these ladies ?" The temple is beautiful, the tourists action is not romantic at all -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Ok, @Basile Morin:, I understand now what you mean, although I do not agree. Anyway, I have uploaded a new version according to your crop suggestion. -- Jakubhal 18:36, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Better, but the description is still missing a major element of this image. Two tourists eye-catching in the center, and a caption like saying "temple only" -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Changed as Ikan Kekek suggested. -- Jakubhal 05:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not because of any of the reasons so far given but because of the weird and unrealistic appearance of the clouds, as if someone had sprayed cleanser on the sky and had stepped away momentarily to get a cloth to wipe it with. Daniel Case (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
    Sorry Daniel Case, but I don't get it. Are you suggesting that I painted that sky? -- Jakubhal 19:28, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jakubhal: I'm saying that it looks extremely unrealistic, that it was not photographed or processed correctly. Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: I have uploaded a new version, the light should be more natural now. Not sure if it solves your problem with sky. -- Jakubhal 20:12, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
I can see what it was supposed to be now ... sort of a thin layer higher up that lightened the sky. But I still don't think the picture works enough for FA. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Wonsgehaig Neubürg P7100062.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2018 at 07:08:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the Neubürg west
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by User:Ermell - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I just love the light and sun rays, and in that context, the central positioning of the cross. I love the symbolism, which I think Christians and non-Christians alike could feel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMartin Falbisoner (talk) 08:03, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support --Laitche (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support although a couple of the spots in the sky could be cloned out; they don't really look like birds so it's probably best to just get rid of them.--Peulle (talk) 15:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 17:41, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great lighting --Poco2 18:18, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks for the nomination Ikan. Just birds Peulle.--Ermell (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 00:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- P999 (talk) 01:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The colors are yellowish like in an old postcard -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Not due to the sunlight, you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't know due to what. The sky looks overprocessed at first sight, but maybe the reason is different. One thing is sure, it was shot against the light -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yellowish colors and there are also blown highlights in the foreground and in the sky. Sorry, I don't like this picture Face-sad.svg -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 16:28, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Intanon 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2018 at 10:00:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Khunkay - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Neutral - Weak support: Really can't tell whether it's overprocessed or not... Good shot though! ― Gerifalte Del Sabana 12:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 19:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - The building looks strangely flattened in this picture, whereas other pictures show it as having 360° symmetry, or at least something much closer to that. Please correct me if I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice spot, nice colours, good lighting but I don't like the perspective and the crop especially the cut-off footpath in front. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks more like a still from a Pixar production than a photograph. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Sunny green paddy fields with water reflection.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2018 at 01:06:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunny green paddy fields with water reflection
EDIT: Although I must say I'd rather support the second picture that Ikan brought up. By the way - isn't that a lens flare hidden in the round top of the tree to the left? It's a bit disturbing. --GeXeS (talk) 17:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed Thanks, GeXeS, for these sharp eyes and for your side note concerning the picture suggested below by Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:19, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 10:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 11:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special, nothing interesting, just agriculture... --Karelj (talk) 19:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Karelj --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looks very good - nice light and a lovely sky. The shack on the right could have been cropped out, maybe. Or maybe not. But the CA in the trees on the left have to be removed for me to support.--Peulle (talk) 21:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I've fixed the flare spotted by GeXeS (the CAs were removed in Lightroom). Concerning the right part, I like the blue sky reflecting in the water and prefer to keep this format ratio 2:1, but I appreciate your suggestion -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:19, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • CA still present on the far left. I can mark it for you if you like.--Peulle (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Huh, it's gone now. And I was sure I refreshed the cache after last time. Oh well. Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • You can check in the history, I've not touched the CAs. Thanks for your support -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the crisscrossing lines. -- King of ♠ 01:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per my comment in QIC, I really like it. ― Gerifalte Del Sabana 03:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Once again I'm on the opposite of Karelj. It's a really beautiful representation of paddy fields in Laos. ― Gerifalte Del Sabana 04:00, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:02, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 18:04, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I really like that pattern Poco2 18:16, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very beautiful picture, very beautiful place. Nice light and sky. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 00:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tozina (talk) 00:18, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For many years I've been searching for The Perfect Paddy Field, never to find it. My search is over now, I guess. -- KennyOMG (talk) 20:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice! --Laitche (talk) 02:34, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Agapanthus cultivar. Zaailing van Agapanthus Lilac Flash. (d.j.b.) 04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2018 at 15:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family Agapanthaceae.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Agapanthus cultivar. A selected seedling of Agapanthus Lilac Flash. A Close-up of a beautiful flower of a selected Agapanthus in mild evening light.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 04:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:41, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very delicate, nice bokeh and lighting but the right crop is improvable --Poco2 18:11, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 00:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- P999 (talk) 01:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Poco -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:14, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Plants