Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Shortcut: COM:CID Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.

Formalidades[edit]

Nominación[edit]

Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas, entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.

Crear una nueva nominación[edit]

Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.


Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.

Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}

Para votar[edit]

Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram voting question.svg Question).

Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.

Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.

Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.

Reglas[edit]

  • Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
  • Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
  • Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
  • Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
  • Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.

La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:

  • estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
  • que haya un mínimo de cinco votos a favor
  • que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)

Contents

Propuestas[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Crab (Pachygrapsus marmoratus).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2015 at 19:29:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crab (Pachygrapsus marmoratus) on Istrian coast, Adriatic sea
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info True, but its still 1:1. Animal is very wide and short, so you have to crop more. But you cant come much closer, they run away on movement. --Mile (talk) 19:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Bieszczady - zielony raj.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2015 at 14:01:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bieszczady Mountains. Subcarpathian Voivodeship, Poland.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Bettomsik - nominated by Halavar -- Halavar (talk) 14:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Halavar (talk) 14:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful mountains! --Tremonist (talk) 14:07, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vivid green... but not a very interesting subject in my view : a lot of grass and forest, with little volume because of the lighting, and a centered composition make up for a little wow. - Benh (talk) 17:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Kos - Panorama vom Dikeos-Gebirge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2015 at 10:44:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view at northwest part of Kos from Dikeos mountains, Greece

File:Lagopus muta japonica Mount Tsubakuro.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2015 at 10:18:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta japonica) on Mount Tsubakuro, Japan
  • They lure them with food? - Benh (talk) 17:10, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
@Benh: Ok, I'll try that way next time :) --Laitche (talk) 17:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Was just conjecturing! But i'd be in a portable blind, put some bread in a good spot, and wait ;) - Benh (talk) 17:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Eeeeh thought you were joking, so I joked back! --Laitche (talk) 18:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 15:07, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mile (talk) 19:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Macaca fuscata juvenile yawning.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2015 at 09:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata) juvenile yawning at Jigokudani Monkey Park, Nagano, Japan

File:NSG Rotwildpark Stuttgart 2014 14 Bärenschlössle.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2015 at 08:23:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Bärenschlössle" (bear castle) and "Bärensee" (bear lake) in the natural reserve "Rotwildpark", Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural (not sure actually)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info c/u/n by me. — Julian H. 08:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportJulian H. 08:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Another panorama, but not very interesting and too much processed (see the leaves).... in short, no wow--Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review. Just as a note, I don't think this counts as a panorama. — Julian H. 10:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Σπάρτακος: I did some editing now to improve the leave rendering, but I might just have made it worse because I'm not sure exactly what you dislike about them. Could you check and/or specifiy what you don't like? — Julian H. 12:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support At first it didn't made me fell WOW because it seemed like a usual lake-side picture. Although, the reflection on the water is simply brilliant here. A few clouds in the sky might help, though. -- Pofka (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support per Pofka. --Tremonist (talk) 14:07, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Maybe QI,nothing more for me. --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Swedish landscape near Björnlunda (by Pudelek) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2015 at 21:15:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swedish landscape near Björnlunda
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 21:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 21:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not distorted, as you could erroneously assume on first glance. Ordinarily I'd want less clouds, but a bluer sky would have been overwhelming in conjunction with that green. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 07:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:22, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support D kuba (talk) 12:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:02, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is very clear composition therefore the cables are too disturbing (as if to be seen the main subject). --Laitche (talk) 16:49, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The major pattern of the composition is that it's half bottom plain green, half top light grey. It could be more dynamic and interesting to me. I also think it's a bit small for a panorama, even though it's within limits. - Benh (talk) 17:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Macaca fuscata meditation.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2015 at 20:49:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Macaca fuscata meditation

File:Aerial view of Capitol Hill at night, looking east from Pine and 9th.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2015 at 10:03:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view of Capitol Hill (Seattle) at night, looking east from Pine and 9th.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by dllu -- dllu (t,c) 10:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- dllu (t,c) 10:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very well done technically, a QI in a heartbeat, but aesthetically undistinguished from any other nighttime cityscape. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent! That there are other similar pictures is no reason for me to oppose. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Lothar. --Tremonist (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support My brains immediately told me: SUPPORT THIS. These streets lights are just stunning here. -- Pofka (talk) 14:07, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry per Daniel --LivioAndronico (talk) 15:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 15:09, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 19:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality is so-so, but I like this "urban mess" in this case, especially because you didn't undergone some heavy post processing, which often become plastic. --Mile (talk) 19:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Leegheide-nahe-Glabbacher-Bruch-2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2015 at 05:01:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Leegheide inside the protected area Krickenbecker Seen und Kleiner De Wittsee in Nettetal
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 05:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 05:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good composition. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 13:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Interesting proportion but grassses on the bottom part are disturbing the composition. --Laitche (talk) 16:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks, Laitche for your comment. The grasses are placed there on purpose. Classical foreground, midground, background composition. IMHO the photo would look worse without these grasses. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
      • I guessed grasses are one of elements but in this case light green (mid) ground is too little in this composition. If there are a bit more ground (midground), I would agree :) --Laitche (talk) 19:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A nice composition and a good technical achievement but the subject is not worth a FP to me.--Jebulon (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Jebulon. While this avoids the usual pitfall of shooting almost into the sun, there are still some small blown areas in the clouds, and I'm not sure that the composition delivers enough to offset that. I don't like the crop on the cloud, for one thing, and Laitche is correct about the paucity of ground. Daniel Case (talk) 01:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I understand the intention of this composition. The trees in one line similar to a pearl necklace and the cloudy look interesting. But the tree on the left is disturbing the composition. The photographer should try a different placement here. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:52, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:22, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition. --Tremonist (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. There probably is way too much of sky captured (like 4/5 of the picture?) and yet it has cropped clouds. Cropped tree doesn't help as well. Probably wrong angle... -- Pofka (talk) 14:10, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Dam at Jalpa de Canovas 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2015 at 04:15:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:A rolling stone gathers no moss.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2015 at 03:30:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looks oversharpened to me, most remarkable on the unsharp areas at the edges. I would also expect better sharpness at the edges - wasn't it a flat structure? --Tuxyso (talk) 05:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ Tuxyso You are correct on the sharpening and the soft edges. On the sharpening... I oversharpened intentionally because I am treating this as an abstract interpretation of color and texture, while trying to minimize some of the softness. On the soft edges... I decided to go with them after I saw them in the computer, it really ticked me off becuase that lens is not supposed to do that, it is an L series Canon lens, and while taking pictures I intentionally used f8 for its supposed sweet spot and to avoid this potential problem. I get now that this lens is no good in macro mode. Nonetheless, the softness works for me, perhaps not for others, as an abstraction. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think a more useful description would be important to be able to judge the image. I expected it to be an underwater photo from the image quality, but nothing else suggests that it is. — Julian H. 07:29, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ Julian, You are correct, is is not an underwater shot... and will update desription. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment These are lichens, not moss. I've changed the categorization accordingly, suggest to change the description as well (maybe something like "various species of lychen covering a rock"?). --El Grafo (talk) 07:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ El Grafo Thank you for your pointing out the correct classification and for updating the category. One learns soomething new everyday!!! And I will update the description... I don´t know if I can change the file name, but I think it still conveys an idea. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Even if not scientific neither precise nor descriptive enough, I think the current tomascastelazian file name makes sense, even in french. Please Symbol keep vote.svg Keep it... My two centesimos.--Jebulon (talk) 22:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
        • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Merci Caballero. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
          • I don't know, but what is a title for? Certainly having a smart idiom as title will not help anybody searching images of the subject. Working your way through the cats is quite weird for non-commoners, so I see little value in such a title, at least here (opposed to flickr etc., where you have tags). --DXR (talk) 09:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Could be interesting if executed well, but unfortunately both the sharpness and the post-processing are really not convincing to me. --DXR (talk) 09:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looks really interesting! --Tremonist (talk) 14:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too blured at all sides -- Christian Ferrer 19:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Dacelo novaeguineae waterworks.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2015 at 03:03:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Laughing Kookaburra (Dacelo novaeguineae) perched on a Silver Wattle (Acacia dealbata), Waterworks Reserve, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia"

Alternative[edit]

"Laughing Kookaburra (Dacelo novaeguineae) perched on a Silver Wattle (Acacia dealbata), Waterworks Reserve, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia"

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Re-cropped from the first version. --Laitche (talk) 19:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as editor. --Laitche (talk) 19:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice Charles (talk) 23:09, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support this version also. --Pine 00:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Right crop is not perfect, but the colours are just beautiful, and so is the quality. — Julian H. 07:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 15:10, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Моржи на фоне мыса Останцового, остров Хейса.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2015 at 20:16:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Walruses in Franz Joseph Land Reserve, Arkhangelsk Oblast, Russia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Nixette - nominated by A.Savin --A.Savin 20:16, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 20:16, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Много хороших фото с севера, ну у всех света не хватает. Осветить надо, немного. --Mile (talk) 08:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Petar: Я сейчас понимаю очень хорошо. Daniel Case (talk) 21:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice and good --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but unfavorable light. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good composition. --Laitche (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Sonnenaufgang -- 2015 -- 4952.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2015 at 13:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise near Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer 13:01, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 13:01, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is special. The mood. The tree. Great work. --Code (talk) 18:10, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose YAFS. Like the "blue hour"-pictures, they're cliche. Kleuske (talk) 18:40, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Still not completely sure I know what that acronym means. I have an idea, but maybe you could be so kind to verify it. — Julian H. 20:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Definitely one of our nicer sunsetsrises. Still not really much more than that. — Julian H. 20:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Um, it's a sunrise. Read the image description before you say things like that. Please. Daniel Case (talk) 06:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry. — Julian H. 12:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support WoW --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:25, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, we get too many ordinary sunsets. But this is a well-done winter sunrise. Daniel Case (talk) 06:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per DC. Jee 11:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support If this was sunset, I wouldn't support... --Laitche (talk) 20:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful, I love this kind of recordings.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 15:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Sant'Agostino (Gubbio) - Intern.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2015 at 09:43:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Sant'Agostino (Gubbio) - Intern
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info From the second half of the century. XIII. The interior has a nave with girders supported by arches resting on pillars. Among the most outstanding works of art are to be mentioned: Jesus and the Samaritan woman (1580), Virgil Nucci (first chapel since.); the Madonna del Soccorso, the unknown of the end of the century. XV (5th chapel since.); Our Lady of Grace, fresco by Ottaviano Nelli (3rd chapel d.); Baptism of St. Augustine (1594), by Felice Damiani (fourth chapel d.). Very interesting frescoes in the apse and the triumphal arch, executed by Nelli and his workshop. The triumphal arch is represented the Last Judgment, made perhaps with the help of Jacopo Salimbeni from San Severino. In the apse are illustrated stories from the life of St. Augustine. These paintings, dated 1420, is one of the main examples of late Gothic painting of Gubbio. All by LivioAndronico (talk) 09:43, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico (talk) 09:43, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lights up high are blown out, but that's not so much of the image and it's the price you pay for otherwise exposing what seems to have been a pretty dim church interior so well. Daniel Case (talk) 06:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice mood but I got a bit bored of church interiors, I think we need the rest with this kind of subject... --Laitche (talk) 20:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I do what I can with the material that I find .... in Italy the churches are everywhere. If there was a Buddhist temple I would go there ... but there isn't Face-tongue.svg --LivioAndronico (talk) 22:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I don't think every house in Italy is a church Face-surprise.svg --Laitche (talk) 09:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Every house? what are you talking about? Meh.svg--LivioAndronico (talk) 10:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Houses, buildings, skyscrapers, bridges, towers. Interiors, exteriors anything ok but not a church, we can take a rest for a while... --Laitche (talk) 12:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Churches are ok, no problem at all. I just got a bit tired with churches, that's it :) --Laitche (talk) 12:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • PEO-sweat.svg And what can I tell you Laitche ? Each church has its own architecture, statues, filling spaces etc ... I watch this. However if you hear David Nuclear Blast Animation Rising Mushroom Cloud.gif--LivioAndronico (talk) 14:22, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
P.S. I joke --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
✓OK forget it Smile P.S. I've already told David the same thing :) --Laitche (talk) 14:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment What's the story with the blocky (?) appearance of Jesus below the arch? Is this oversharpened noise? Generally the details look quite rough for ISO 100, imo. --DXR (talk) 09:22, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • is old and a bit spoiled, it happens with the churches of the thirteenth century.Thanks.--LivioAndronico (talk) 10:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Vilnius N-D de la Porte d'Aurore Vilnius.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2015 at 08:44:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Notre Dame de la  Porte de l'Aurore, à  Vilnius,  Lituanie.

File:Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2015 at 07:41:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus).
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus). All by --Mile (talk) 07:41, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 07:41, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me the category is better Animals --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I was considering which category to put, but made up my mind for Animals it would be better if fish would be in whole, with tail. --Mile (talk) 08:36, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support "Food and drink" is better. They are dead. Yann (talk) 08:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition does not work for me, sorry, the plate and the lower right corner are disturbing to me.--Jebulon (talk) 09:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The pattern on the plate does take the eye away from the fish, but then it is a sort of swimming sea pattern, which is an interesting combination. So I think it works. -- Colin (talk) 11:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:08, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Soundwaweserb (talk) 21:17, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tuxyso (talk) 05:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Composition works for me and the details are sharp. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon. --Laitche (talk) 16:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 02:54, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Composition is fine for me. --Tremonist (talk) 13:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Wilhelm Benque - Photograph of Ambroise Thomas.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2015 at 06:39:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Photograph of w:Ambroise Thomas

File:Macaca sinica - 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2015 at 17:18:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wild toque macaque (Macaca sinica) in Yala National Park, Sri Lanka.

File:Grand Théâtre de l'Exposition. Palais des enfants.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2015 at 17:17:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grand Théâtre de l'Exposition. Palais des enfants.jpg
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jules Chéret / BnF, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very high resolution (300 Mpx) of a 19th-century poster by Jules Chéret. -- Yann (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support And as you might oppose?--LivioAndronico (talk) 18:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:10, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral (but thinking about opposing) It is big but so blurred that downscaling it won't remove any information at all. This should have the side effect of preventing some browsers from crashing when opening it. Also wonder where the grid pattern comes from. - Benh (talk) 19:33, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
    • I think the the grid pattern comes from the support texture. I wonder if it was paper, or textile? Please note that the original is quite big (244 x 88 cm). Regards, Yann (talk) 20:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
      • Actually, I might agree about downscaling. Yann (talk) 20:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. I know, I shouldn't complain about too much resolution. But my browser is really sweating trying to show me the image, and the 100% view shows it's really completely unnecessary. — Julian H. 20:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
    • @Benh, Julian Herzog: I downscaled it, is it suitable for you? ;o) The original is still available in the upload history. Yann (talk) 21:14, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
      • Yes, thank you. Now I can reasonably judge it and see, for example, that it has about 3-4 Megapixels of actual resolution. I think 53 Megapixels should be enough to store that data. — Julian H. 21:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
      • Sorry but I still have doubts about the result. It's still blurry, and not sure it renders as good as the original if printed at the same size (not that it's necessary). Don't think the banding is due to the support. It's colored, so I assume it's some sort of noise which came with the capture process. Maybe the original is soft like that ? - Benh (talk) 17:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment After looking at other posters from the same period, I made further adjustments: the white should be white. Yann (talk) 11:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 15:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Big Mac hamburger.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2015 at 15:31:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A McDonald's Big Mac hamburger
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Evan-Amos - uploaded by Evan-Amos - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 15:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kasir (talk) 15:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality,is a few small but good and original --LivioAndronico (talk) 18:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Makes me hungry. Mmmmm....hamburger.--Fotoriety (talk) 01:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Manages to be a good, attractive, but reasonably accurate view of it (unless the people making it squash it, and you get some horrible mess of food) Think the patties might be moved forwards slightly, but otherwise they'd be hidden, so I can live with that. Likewise, the pickled cucumber slices are probably a lot more visible than they'd normally be, but, again, that's acceptable enough. A definite winner. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Something a little different here. Rare, but still well-done Face-wink.svg Daniel Case (talk) 07:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Реалистичное фото! :) Почему-то не используется в русскоязычных проектах Викимедиа... --Brateevsky {talk} 10:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Beware of McD! --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • barely Symbol support vote.svg Support OK from a lighting point of view. But I wish we have more studio like photographs, with the background being an actual one, so we keep the shadow, instead of having to remove it. Would also be pretty interesting to have it side by side with the same subject from the McDo marketing division ;) - Benh (talk) 19:17, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Benh. Not a giant fan of objects standing on something that was cut away. — Julian H. 20:31, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beware of McD, but this image is good! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 02:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Aleja uz Lauku kapiem Jaunpils pusē.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2015 at 09:55:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Linden allee to Lauki cemetery in Jaunpils Municipality, Latvia. Nature monument.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Kikos - uploaded by Kikos - nominated by Kikos -- Kikos (talk) 09:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kikos (talk) 09:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 10:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry,not outstanding for me --LivioAndronico (talk) 13:24, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice mood but overprocessed. --Laitche (talk) 16:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much on the artsy side; overprocessed per Laitche and white balance seems off (perhaps deliberately?) Daniel Case (talk) 16:53, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others and sorry, the sharpening algorithm wasn't lucky finding out what is and what isn't an edge that needs sharpening. — Julian H. 20:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the quality isn't ok, but the idea is fantastic! Please try to do this work again and perhaps as a focus stack. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 02:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose overprocessed.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overprocessed. -- Pofka (talk) 14:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Apollo 11 Launch2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2015 at 03:58:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The launch of Apollo 11 on 16 July 1969. "At 9:32 a.m. EDT, the swing arms move away and a plume of flame signals the liftoff of the Apollo 11 Saturn V space vehicle and astronauts Neil A. Armstrong, Michael Collins and Edwin E. Aldrin, Jr. from Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39A."
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space launch vehicles
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NASA and restored by Mvuijlst - uploaded by Mvuijlst - nominated by Pine -- Pine 03:58, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pine 03:58, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the flames, I think it shows the danger of space flight, like a malfunction could occur. But you can also see that some preparation went in before takeoff to make this a safe trip. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:19, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quite an interesting photo of great historical significance. Although the technical quality is poor by today's standards, the FPC guidelines say something about a bad photo of a good subject is preferable to a good photo of a mundane subject. dllu (t,c) 11:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 07:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 10:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support No good quality but historical significance. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Plans de Frea Murfrëit y Saslonch.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2015 at 21:19:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The vale of Frea in the Dolomites
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:19, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:19, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 23:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Compositionally very nice but please remove the dust spots in the sky. There are at least three of them. --Code (talk) 08:04, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 10:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice view and natural colors except CAs on the left upper corner. --Laitche (talk) 16:24, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support Another landscape that I wish I had taken. Daniel Case (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe I had cropped a bit at right, but what a nice picture !--Jebulon (talk) 22:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:10, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. The blacks in the foreground really lose significant detail and look unnaturally contrasty in my opinion. The, theoretically, bad light isn't too bad here in my opinion because it makes everything look so gigantic. — Julian H. 20:34, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the review. The lights are not unnatural because they are on the picture as in rality whith a very bright and clear sun. You are right about the lights which someone might like smoother as I in fact usually do but i could not change them on that moment ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 15:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Nowruz Zoroastrian (retouched).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2015 at 10:43:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bas-relief in Persepolis
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Anatoly Terentiev, retouched and uploaded by MagentaGreen, nominated by Yann (talk) 10:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think there is a potential here. Hopefully, editing fixed the issues mentioned in the previous nomination. -- Yann (talk) 10:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 12:11, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:15, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 10:24, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kasir (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reguyla (talk) 16:27, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Strong oppose Thanks for fixing CA. But it's really too soft for me to support, jpeg compression I'd say. Some good wildlife, sport and concert pictures get rejected here having MUCH more detail. Why should this have a special treatment? It is a stone with daylight, for a FP it should be razor sharp with twice the resolution we have now. --Kadellar (talk) 16:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strongly per Kadellar.--Jebulon (talk) 22:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Alborzagros (talk) 03:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Samak (talk) 08:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Soft, below 4 megapixels despite static subject. Not FP to me. — Julian H. 20:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 07:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Farshid . Talk 14:26, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

File:140626 Tierser Alpl Rosszähne.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2015 at 05:00:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The alpine refuge Alpe di Tires is located in the Dolomites

File:Men triple jump French Athletics Championships 2013 t154029.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2015 at 16:01:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Men triple jump French Athletics Championships 2013
No, I want a subject that clearly stands out. Daniel Case (talk) 17:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Ermita de Nuestra Señora de Jerusalén, Artajona, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 09.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2015 at 05:07:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View in a foggy morning of the basilica of Our Lady of Jerusalem, Artajona, Navarre, Spain. The basilica was built between 1709 and 1714 honors the Lady of Jerusalem, patron saint of Artajona.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View in a foggy morning of the basilica of Our Lady of Jerusalem, Artajona, Navarre, Spain. The basilica was built between 1709 and 1714 honors the Lady of Jerusalem, patron saint of Artajona. All by me. Poco2 05:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 05:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Muy buena imagen, felicidades! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- At first look, I thought it was a painting. Though not quite sharp, but well shot. Nikhil (talk) 07:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Stunning. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a bit overprocessed? but great mood! --Laitche (talk) 09:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Symbol support vote.svg Support (will this trick work on the bot?) This is wonderful. What a nice mood. Harldy spoiled by the electric line ! - Benh (talk) 09:47, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
@Benh: Double votes? --Laitche (talk) 10:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Was just a humorous way to show I'm very impressed. Maybe not as humorous as I intended but as long as one gets the understatement ;) - Benh (talk) 13:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Ok, I arranged your vote :) --Laitche (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wow -- Christian Ferrer 11:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Christian - WOW! --Pudelek (talk) 11:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice mood. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice Poco, well done --The Photographer (talk) 14:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree with the painting comments. Quality is not great, but the mood certainly is. --DXR (talk) 14:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very nice mood (wonder what Lightroom 6.1's dehaze would make of this :-)) but the right-hand-side dark trees and metal structure just spoil the scene. I suggest a 2:1 crop at the left (as indicated). So I think a better picture is possible. -- Colin (talk) 17:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Metal structure for me is a minor problem too, I had added a note about it, however, dark areas make a nice contrast in the composition with the foreground and background. --The Photographer (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks very painterly with the fog ... I really thought it was one at first. The crop wouldn't change my !vote, although I'm not bothered at all by the issues it addresses. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Painting-like. --King of ♠ 00:51, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very beautiful. --Code (talk) 08:04, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:29, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 07:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

File:Sant'Agata dei Goti (Rome) - Interior.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2015 at 21:31:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sant'Agata dei Goti (Rome) - Interior
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A little bit too dark in some places, and the lights higher up are sort of blown—but given the very Baroque feel of the church that actually works in the image's favor. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe too strong contrast, but it works here. --Mile (talk) 08:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Overall a bit too unsharp. --Laitche (talk) 20:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Taggenbrunn 11 Burgruine mit Weinberg 18072015 5993.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2015 at 15:48:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz (talk) -- Johann Jaritz 15:48, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:48, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think that this is a nice picture but taken at the wrong time of day. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It happened that I was just there at noon. Perhaps there will be another opportunity one day for an image in the late afternoon.--Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Tomascastelazo, but I oppose, sorry (it's really not you, but a common voting pattern with me). - Benh (talk) 11:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Tomas; this has potential if photographed with raking light. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment since this nomination doesn't seem to be going anywhere fast, I thought I'd experiment with drawing out the patterns in the landscape with a b&w conversion. I've posted an alternative below. Johann Jaritz, if you hate it or don't want this added to your nomination then please feel free to remove the alt, or request the image be deleted. -- Colin (talk) 16:39, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you, Colin, I am fascinated by your idea and the endeavors you made. The B&W result is far better than the color version. The crop of the sky increased the quality as well. Perhaps there is a little chance now. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Johann Jaritz, if you support the b&w version, you need to explicitly put a support vote against that version as each alt is counted separately -- but it is up to you of course. -- Colin (talk) 07:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Colin, I am still pondering. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:17, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 07:18, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm not sure what the lower third and upper quarter add to the picture. — Julian H. 20:17, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 10:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Taggenbrunn 11 Burgruine mit Weinberg 18072015 5993 b&w alt.jpg

File:Bulgarian folk dancers and musicians in Brussels.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2015 at 08:18:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bulgarian folk dancers in Brussels.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tropcho - uploaded by Tropcho - nominated by Tropcho -- Tropcho (talk) 08:18, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tropcho (talk) 08:18, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Upper part (background) a little dark. --Tremonist (talk) 15:51, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very good. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 06:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent picture of ethnic costume. Some flaws—unsharp background in upper right and some CA—but not enough to compromise the subject of the image. Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like this photo but not Featured picture, imho. --Laitche (talk) 16:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Laitche. What is there to be featured? No good light, no interesting actions (no actions actually), slightly tilted, jpeg compression artifacts. If you could see their pants, skirts, shoes and dresses it would have a bit more of EV as well. --Kadellar (talk) 17:03, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
@Kadellar:Well, it's perhaps a question of taste. The costumes, although not completely visible, are rather pretty, I think. But what I like best about this picture - and what adds wow for me - are the facial expressions of the dancers, which span a broad spectrum of emotions - from melancholy, through bewilderment and amusement, to mild scepticism. I may be wrong of course, but I think it's not really the most common and boring juxtaposition. It's certainly amusing to me. As said, possibly a question of taste. Regarding the light, what is it precisely that bothers you? And what would have been better in your opinion? Tropcho (talk) 18:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For what the nominator said. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:36, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The quality isn't great but more importantly, they don't really look happy or even neutral. Unless this is some kind of a signature look for Bulgarian folk dancers, I think this is not a featurable representation. — Julian H. 20:15, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Galerie Vivienne, 12 March 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2015 at 06:06:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Lothar Spurzem we all have different approach to "decoding" images. Some see colors better, some read volumes easier... I admit a panorama may make it hard to read volume, but I think "bended lines" are a too easy targets. Many photos with straight lines give "no real impression" either because projecting volumes on 2D comes with tradeoffs, and keeping lines straight often mean proportions are lost. And many photos might gives "no real impression" because you don't see colors as intended or because of bad processing. As for me, I think one can easily tell there are two alleys which are perpendicular to each other. But I know the place of course... Anyhow, I guess you mostly mean that you don't like my compositional choices (which is fine, but saddens me). - Benh (talk) 05:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Not sure how to read this. But (un)fortunately, this passage is not so busy to start with. So it's both a bit sad, and not an achievement (depending on what you meant). - Benh (talk) 05:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • The image as it is stands for itself, not needing anything really. However, the same picture with people can be interesting. It is a public space, but with no public, and this in itself is different, almost like a movie set. Anyway, I wonder about the demographics... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I have to say that I really like this picture, it has Wabi Sabi. I like the details like the pipes, the ceiling glass, the damaged floor, the books and cards and art. It is nice indeed. I really do not like to compare, but here this to me is so Norman Rockwell sans the people. And I love Norman Rockwell. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you Tomas. I'm not surprised by your comment, and if I may, this is how I "identified" you. You focus more on people and what makes things live or evolve, when I'm more into static stuffs (making references to wabi sabi or Norman Rockwell says a lot. Not that I knew them, but Wikipedia helps ;) ). I agree that a picture with people would give more life to it, be more faithful and best represent the atmosphere. But I'm just not good at it, and made a few failed attempts here. I've also come to be careful when photographing people : it may hurt them that I spead their image all over the net (have had some debate here, and many don't agree with me). This aside, this picture is HDR. It's always tricky to blend exposures when people are in the way, so I'd rather have less of them to begin with. - Benh (talk) 06:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great details and very clear image of a normal day. I like this color balance :) --Laitche (talk) 09:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great shot! --Gyrostat (talk) 12:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 00:50, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ---Code (talk) 16:43, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice! --Kadellar (talk) 17:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportJulian H. 20:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose unnatural distortion: the mosaic on the ground is a perfect circle in the real life if I remember well...--Jebulon (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • No projection, even the rectilinear you probably think as a "more normal than others" projection, will show it to you as a circle (unless the circle is in a plan perpendicular to the view direction). You can not like it (I'm used to that), but it's not wrong in itself. - Benh (talk) 21:14, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • And if I may... The bassin (which is a "perfect" circle too) doesn't show as circle here either dear Jebulon ;) - Benh (talk) 21:32, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Ne te fais pas plus bête que tu l'es, cher Benh ;). Tu comprends très bien ce que je veux dire. Je suis d'accord avec toi, mais tu sais que je n'apprécie pas ce genre de "projection", que je trouve trop artificielle par rapport à ce que voit mon œil. Tu nous proposes une vision déformée par ta lentille, et j'aime pô. Et non, contrairement à ce que tu dis à Lothar Spurzem, avec cette projection il n'est pas évident que les deux allées soient perpendiculaires, mê si moi aussi je connais les lieux. Ton choix n'est pas faux en soi (ai-je dit ça ?), il ne correspond pas à mes canons esthétiques et ce n'est pas nouveau... Quant à ton contre-exemple, tu t'es donné bien du mal pour retrouver quelque argument que, quant à moi, je juge bien peu convaincant, voire carrément capillotracté. Tu es souvent la voix discordante ici, et c'est très bien ainsi (sauf si ça devient systématique et s'apparente à une "posture"...). Permets que j'apporte ici ma modeste contradiction, qui permettra d'ailleurs à ton image, Ô paradoxe, de rester plus longtemps sur cette page !!!--Jebulon (talk) 08:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Je cherche à montrer l'absurdité d'un vote contre basé sur une "idéologie" finalement. Tu ne peux pas lancer de telles affirmations (ça n'est pas un cercle...) d'une telle manière sur la place publique. Déjà parce que c'est faux, et parce que beaucoup prennent ça pour argent comptant et ne se posent pas plus de questions que ça. Ça marche en politique, ça marche ici. Et je ne dis pas à Lothar que c'est évident ; je dis que ça l'est plus pour certains que pour d'autres. Il y a une forte nuance. Moi je suis bon avec les volumes, et ai été éduqué assez jeune avec des photos projetées comme ça : ça ne me gêne pas et mon cerveau fait le travail inverse rapidement. Je suis sûr de ne pas être seul dans ce cas. Tu peux dire explicitement que tu n'aimes pas, mais là, ton vote est formulé comme si le cercle qui n'en est plus était une vérité. C'est exactement la même chose sur ta photo (si!). Juste que tu sais faire la projection inverse sur ce type d'image. Et encore dès fois on se gourre, les architectes faisant souvent usage de techniques trompe-l'oeil. Tu voterais contre un planisphère? Tu réalises que l’Antarctique ou le Groenland ne sont pas aussi grands que ce qui est représenté sur la plupart des planisphères? Pourtant c'est un outil scientifique... Ça choque moins car on y est tellement habitué qu'on ne se pose plus la question, mais c'est pourtant grossier. Quant à ma voix discordante... si c'est le cas, c'est juste que la ligne éditoriale retenue après votes ne correspond pas souvent à mes goûts et convictions. Mais je ne suis pas discordant pour le plaisir ; à priori je suis constant dans mes propos (sauf évolutions dues à l'âge, je me fais vieux). Ouf. Note tout de même que j'ai une ligne directrice : c'est que la photo ait qq chose d'un minimum exceptionnel, dans le sens où ça n'est pas le type de photo facile à prendre. Sinon je reste ouvert à tout et essaie de ne pas voter contre les images dont le sujet ne m'intéresse pas, sauf erreur flagrante. - Benh (talk) 09:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Je crois que l'idéologue, là, c'est toi, désolé. Pas de "projection" ici, juste le résultat d'une lentille déformante. Et j'avais pensé à l'argument du planisphère de Mercator évidemment, mais pour en tirer la conclusion exactement inverse de la tienne. Tu as le droit d'être discordant à ton gré. Moi aussi. Et vive la Cité Idéale d'Urbino !--Jebulon (talk) 23:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Bon on rentre dans le point godwin... et on pourrait continuer longtemps avec les "non c'est toi"... Et malheureusement si, il y a "projection" (ou alors tu as raté qq chose, désolé). Tes lentilles ne font que ça, les logiciels type Hugin aussi. Je continue cette conversation en privé. On a assez pollué ici. - Benh (talk) 08:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Tour Saint-Jacques BLS.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2015 at 03:46:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • This is a third attempt... and I don't think we could. If I take it a bit earlier, the bottom part of the tower is in the shade (because of surrounding buildings). If I take it at later time, shadows have grown too much horizontaly. This is north side of the tower, leaving a very short window to get it right. Now to say all about it, the rightmost building should have been lit by the sun on top, but I found it distracting, so I used a shot taken dozens of minutes before to stitch, so everything but the tower is in the shade. Not quite faithful to reality, but more beautiful in my opinion. - Benh (talk) 06:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Fair enough. Short of pulling a Mr. Burns-esque act of villainy, I don't see a way of controlling the lighting here. Striking the "weak". — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • What about shooting the scene in June? Don't want to be a smart-ass here, but 8 o'clock in April is imo not really the best time to get optimal light on a north facade. --DXR (talk) 14:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Smart ;) true. I probably wouldn't have waited until June had I realised then (I don't plan this far). I could do it again now, checked that July is still good enough, but my backlog of photos to process or move to wiki has quite swelled up lately... I may go there and just see how the lighting renders (maybe the right building come out of the shade). But I personally like the lighting enough that way. I guess I'll just wait next year to actually take the photo again. - Benh (talk) 14:58, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • And leaves of the tree might be an annoyance. - Benh (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I didn't mean to say "Go out and do it better", but rather react to Crisco's comment ;-). I'd rather have you create great new stuff like this than spend too much time for that tower. --DXR (talk) 15:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not a very inspiring shot, but I think lighting won't get (edit after discussion above) much better than this, and will fulfill its encyclopedic purposes well. - Benh (talk) 06:55, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:47, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:11, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good composition and perspective control. --Laitche (talk) 17:37, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:40, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I salute you, Benh, for all you've tried to do here. But the unnatural sky color and CA around it suggest overprocessing here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I'm not Crisco, but guess "you takin' to me" instead ;) Not too sure how it's unnatural, but I used a polariser filter to darken the sky. It was even darker than that and I had to brighten it actually. I don't see CA, and they don't come from overprocessing so I guess you mean "halo" you get from oversharpening. I do sharpen so the fine details stand out more, but feel it's not pushed too far. I'll listen to other points of view. - Benh (talk) 04:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Post amended. Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Concernant les CAs je suppose que Daniel parle des traces violettes sur la balustrade en haut de l'immeuble de droite. Les ombres semblent avoir été très éclaircies, ce qui doit affecter dans une certaine mesure le contraste et donc le rendu des couleurs. Je n'ai pour ma part rien décidé concernant mon vote. Really sorry I'm a bit too tired after my day job to try to speak in English. -- Christian Ferrer 20:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • J'ai regardé de nouveau et je pense qu'il parle des halos autour des batiments. Il faut vraiment regarder de près la miniature pour le voir. C'est un phénomène qui vient du fait que j'ai fusionné trois expositions. C'est ce qui me permet d'avoir les bâtiments sur le côté relativement clairs (sans ça ils seraient vraiment sombres). Je ne sais pas si je dois m'entêter à essayer de voir ça (je dois déjà revoir mon image de la cathédrale de Condom). Si les critiques sont unanimes, je le ferai. Pour le vote, tu n'as pas à te justifier, je suis là pour lire des avis francs :) - Benh (talk) 06:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Lack of color vibrancy. -- Christian Ferrer 14:38, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not happy about how you brightened the parts of the sky towards the left and right where the dark buildings are, not happy about the bottom crop. But man, that light just works perfectly with this architecture. — Julian H. 20:11, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes I noticed that after Daniel Case mentioned it as "CA". Not happy with it either... I spent a lot of time on that picture... so I'm a bit annoyed ;). It's due to exposures blending, and not an effect of me brightening the sky (which was much darker because of the polariser). Added to my backlog for fix. - Benh (talk) 21:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

File:2015 Kostra, Góry Bardzkie, Sudety.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2015 at 21:15:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kostra, Bardzkie Mountains, Sudetes
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful landscape. --Tremonist (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Drought --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support What are you doing with my camera and my lens Jacek? Face-surprise.svg....I joke --LivioAndronico (talk) 19:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:39, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:45, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:44, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Uaoaei1. One of those pictures that you think looks great right after you take it ... until you get home and look at it closely on your monitor and see all the clutter and asymmetry you didn't realize was there. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, sorry; nothing featurable imo. --Kadellar (talk) 17:07, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The picture draws my eyes to the hill in the middle, but I don't find it's a very rewarding subject, making the composition a bit boring. Lighting could be better as well. Why not trying at sunrise or sunset? - Benh (talk) 09:29, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, lacks interesting content in my eyes. — Julian H. 20:10, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Mundane composition. Technical quality OK, but not very good due to limitations of equipment (poor sharpness near edges). dllu (t,c) 11:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

File:2015 Koniunkcja Jowisza i Wenus.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2015 at 21:11:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Conjunction of Jupiter and Venus, observed in Kłodzko
  • Maybe Daniel likes the contradictions... --Laitche (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry; I had meant to oppose; I had gotten back from Mexico earlier in the day and I was tired and probably shouldn't have been editing. !Vote amended. Daniel Case (talk) 18:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't find the composition really appealing either, but the title Conjunction of Jupiter and Venus (or something like that) suggests that the main subject is made of the two dots on the very upper right corner. It's not a successful depiction of the topic in my opinion. It's possible to catch them near horizon to get a better composition (I don't talk about the basic composition on that photo of course). Besides, I really expect to see some other stars in the sky of a photo which promises you "astronomy" (perhaps not as many as on the milky way nom though). - Benh (talk) 17:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per Benh. Indeed, his picture is much more interesting: File:Astrophotography Panorama Test Shot.jpg. Yann (talk) 11:10, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks Yann, but I feel a bit embarassed. It was only a quick test shot (practical field test to try to reproduce how the milky way nom was shot) and I never thought it was worthy an upload on Commons. At least I'll try to clone the electric line out (only added the task to my backlog for now) - Benh (talk) 14:07, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • My point is that, even far to be perfect, but still better that this nomination. If you can clone out the cables, it will be great. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Vultur gryphus head (Linnaeus, 1758).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2015 at 17:50:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Head by the Andean condor (Vultur gryphus) in Hanover Zoo.

File:Alaska Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2015 at 12:38:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alaska Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes)
Well, its just filename, you can see Vulpes vulpes fulvus how a file category. What do you mean about over-exposed, could you add notes?. Could you show me what is a "Many better pictures of Vulpes vulpe" fulvus for you? and sharp is relative because its a hight size picture of a wild animal --The Photographer (talk) 09:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
My comments of better images referred to Vulpes vulpes, not sub species. Withdrawn my oppose. Charles (talk) 23:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very nice. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:09, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like the face and the color contrast but ... I still think it could be better with a crop on the left to square things off. However, there seems to be a bit of color noise that also remains. I am not sure that the greenish areas I see in full-res are actually there. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lots of unnecessary colour noise. Bottom/top crop relation is not ideal imo. — Julian H. 16:18, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Julian. --Laitche (talk) 21:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too tight crop. Lower part of the animal is not visible. -- Pofka (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Río Dynjandisá, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 118-120 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2015 at 19:58:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flow of the Dynjandisá river just over the Dynjandi waterfall in the region of Vestfirðir, northwestern Iceland.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Flow of the Dynjandisá river just over the Dynjandi waterfall in the region of Vestfirðir, northwestern Iceland. Poco2 19:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 19:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is more sharp of the others,more the river give a beautiful composition --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice --Pudelek (talk) 09:44, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:28, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:31, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Because of the dull lighting and "random" composition (don't get a better word in my thin english vocabulary, no offense intended). - Benh (talk) 19:11, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:40, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose About lighting per Benh, I guess this is intentional composition but not works, imo. --Laitche (talk) 22:09, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition don't work for me too. -- Christian Ferrer 11:14, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition, and having freshly experienced the challenges and rewards of photography in wild Arctic and subarctic landscapes I honestly don't think you could do much better than this—you could wait for a clear day, but that's asking for a lot of time. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For what Mr. Chase said. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:46, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per opposers. Dull light is unfortunate and might be common, but that doesn't make this image outstanding. Subject doesn't really make up for this either. --DXR (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Jules Bianchi Marussia 2013 Silverstone F1 Test 002.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2015 at 19:05:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Jules Bianchi Marussia 2013 Silverstone F1 Test
  • Well Laitche, the middle of the picture is just the machine (with Jules Bianchi dead a few days ago after the incident in Suzuka) --LivioAndronico (talk) 11:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
@Livio: I have no words about that. Maybe I want to see his back walking on this road and holding the helmet with his hand. --Laitche (talk) 12:23, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • In Japan, nobody do not mention it Laitche ? In Italy many calling for the head of the guy with the green flag --LivioAndronico (talk) 16:08, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
@Livio: Yes, of course I knew it but did not realize this photo is him until read your comment. I saw many news in Japanese but all of them had written "ビアンキ", so I didn't know the spelling... Kamui commented about his death, I don't know any more about that in Japan. --Laitche (talk) 16:28, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, no wow. Composition seems unbalanced, with car too far to the left and the top too dark. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Case. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 03:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. -- Pofka (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:White-cheeked Starlings perching on the cables.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2015 at 17:23:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White-cheeked Starlings perching on the cables.
@XRay: ✓ Done --Laitche (talk) 17:56, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Better. Hopefully you like this crop. Thanks. --XRay talk 18:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A normal picture of a normal day --Σπάρτακος (talk) 19:03, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wish I see more of theses. Am not lucky enough to witness that on my own normal days, and certainly not normal by FPC's standard (not a panorama, nor a shell, nor a church...). I would try to make the cables parallels to strengthen the composition. - Benh (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unusual FPC of birds. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry,but not wow for me --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:12, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
orz --Laitche (talk) 21:32, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
In this way will be more original Face-smile.svg --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the birds sitting on this cables looking a bit like a sheet music. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:35, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice idea and composition. --Code (talk) 21:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 06:08, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:33, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 08:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice! --Tremonist (talk) 15:25, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is a very classic type image, very cliché, and generally works nice. In this case I think that the blue is too overwhelming and takes away the punch that this type of image has visually. I prefer much lighter sky and in black and white. This image, generally speaking is about photographic rythm. I would support this image if the sky was lightened by 2 f stops. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:27, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great idea but, per Tomas, background is a little too dark. Also I think the dead space at top and bottom could be cropped down a bit. Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Tomas: @Daniel✓ Lightened. --Laitche (talk) 10:19, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks nice Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:52, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Norra Kvill National Park, Sweden (by Pudelek).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2015 at 12:45:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Norra Kvill National Park, Sweden
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:45, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:45, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Left is dark but WOW! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--LivioAndronico (talk) 13:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support FP, but IMO minor CAs at the right. --XRay talk 17:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very nice, I like this photo but a bit small for this type photos, left and the right top crop are a bit pity. Nearly support neutral. --Laitche (talk) 17:43, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 19:07, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose 1350px on the short edge is just way too little for a recent image, let alone a fairly ordinary landscape FP candidate. I am frankly a bit surprised if people critizise noise in 30+ MP images and support such images like this that are strongly downsampled, sorry. --DXR (talk) 13:58, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:21, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very beautiful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, noting the minor CA as XRay does. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per DXR, sorry. I think for a landscape photo, 6 MP is not too much to ask. — Julian H. 20:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support D kuba (talk) 20:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose all per DXR. Don't see any CA (if people mentioning them point them out). - Benh (talk) 17:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Salarom Sabah Frame-of-a-new-house-01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2015 at 12:01:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kg. Salarom, Sapulut, Sabah: A carpenter is working at the frame of a newly built, traditional house in Kg Salarom
All by-- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:01, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:01, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 17:38, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High EV and well done, but the sky looks a little bit cyanic. Additionally, the sharpness of the main subject could be a little bit better. --Code (talk) 05:31, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I slightly raised the sharpness. For the sky, I have to mention, that it indeed looks like that. If you compare with other photos of my Sabah series, taken at very bright days under bornean light, you will notice, that they all look like that. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer 18:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:20, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Nice to have something like this. I can vouch for the sky being like that; it drives me nuts sometimes. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Best picture I've ever seen of a timber frame house under construction, but unfortunately the blown clouds in back are too distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for review, Daniel, but please check your monitor. I don't know how you sugguest, that the clouds are blown out. I can see structure in every cloud and the histo of the full resolution also tells me, that there is not a single pixel which has RGB 255. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Well, I checked my monitor, it's alright. However, while it is true that there were no 255 areas, there were a lot that were close (245, 249). So I wondered if I could bring out the clouds a little more. See below. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support D kuba (talk) 20:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't see any blown cloud here. Technically very good, rare and high EV document. Never seen this, FP for me.--Jebulon (talk) 23:28, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice colors. --King of ♠ 01:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Alternative with highlights reduced

Salarom Sabah Frame-of-a-new-house-01 edit.jpg


If someone's interested in voting for this, please go ahead. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry to say so, but it is oversaturated now and the sky top left is posterized. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 06:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
I think you need to fix your monitor Face-wink.svg. But you must admit there's more cloud structure visible. Daniel Case (talk) 15:48, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Bee on Lavender Blossom.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2015 at 06:48:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European Honey Bee sitting on a lavender blossom
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Not intended to serve as a perfect example of a classic macro shot per se - although taken with a macro lense (Canon EF 100 2,8). I like this picture primarily for a couple of compositional reasons: The stems and leaves, each showing a different level of blur, provide depth as well as vertical structure; the smooth green background contrasts well with the bee's yellow-orange profile. All by --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:48, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:48, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment. I find the out-of-focus blossom on the left distracting, it clashes with the blurred green background. I know cropping it out will disturb your composition, but that's what I would do. —Bruce1eetalk 07:13, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Bee on Lavender Blossom 2.jpg

File:Morpho peleides (Kollar, 1850).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2015 at 00:40:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A unhealthy/wing-damaged Morpho peleides at the Schmetterlingshaus (Butterfly zoo) in the Palmenhaus (palm house) near the Burggarten in Vienna, Austria.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:40, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:40, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:50, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportBruce1eetalk 06:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I find the flash too harsh in this case. The wing damage doesn't make it an ideal specimen either, although I suppose it has some value in showing how the wing damage is manifested. Diliff (talk) 10:42, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Halavar (talk) 13:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wonderful--LivioAndronico (talk) 13:41, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Diliff and the damage is not only the wing but also the legs. --Laitche (talk) 15:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 19:09, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Colours distorted by flash or editing. This image File:Morpho peleides02.jpg is so much better Charles (talk) 22:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support even though I agree partly with Diliff here. --Tremonist (talk) 15:23, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Diliff. Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles. -- Colin (talk) 17:18, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:45, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info We must realize that the Wikimedia not only images for Wikipedia provides, but also for many other media that require images. This image shows the disability at a butterfly. Disability is an important issue. In books and lectures on the topic "handicap" can this image be shown at the beginning and lead in this way on "disability". This is an example of the subsequent use of the image in the media. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:38, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Pseudothemis zonata, Keitakuen, Osaka.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2015 at 20:22:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pseudothemis zonata, Keitakuen, Osaka.

File:Storebæltsforbindelsen højbroen.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2015 at 18:36:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:36, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:36, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes the composition work,the subject is clear and interesting --LivioAndronico (talk) 19:12, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The lighting just isn't very exciting for me. I also feel there could be more of the rocks down below. --King of ♠ 22:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 12:48, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 19:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per King, sorry. Competent shot and useful, but the light doesn't allow for much wow. --DXR (talk) 14:17, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sufficiently wowed, and I'm not sure the light's all of that. Maybe it's the pale sky that doesn't offset the earth tones of the rock enough. Maybe it's the composition that seems not to be able to distinguish between bridge and rocks as the subject of the image. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Colin (talk) 17:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think for this composition to really work, the central part of the bridge would have to be closer. Also per others. — Julian H. 16:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Mausoleum of Galla Placidia mosaics.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2015 at 16:59:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Combination of ceiling mosaics in mausoleum of Galla Placidia. UNESCO World heritage site. Ravenna, Italy.