Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:CID Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | հայերեն | +/−

Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.

Formalidades[edit]

Nominación[edit]

Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas, entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.

Crear una nueva nominación[edit]

Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.


Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.

Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}

Para votar[edit]

Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question).

Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.

Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.

Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.

Reglas[edit]

  • Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
  • Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
  • Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
  • Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
  • Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.

La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:

  • estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
  • que haya un mínimo de cinco votos a favor
  • que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)


Recarga para nuevas nominaciones: purge this page's cache

Propuestas[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Tiny house surrounded by trees, inhabited in the middle of green paddy fields in sunshine under a stormy sky at golden hour in Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2020 at 00:21:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tiny house surrounded by trees, inhabited in the middle of green paddy fields in sunshine under a stormy sky at golden hour in Laos
  • Lol :-) It was last year, so to be honest I don't remember what happened next. I always walk with a waterproof bag. But one thing is sure, the sun might have disappeared in the minute after this shot -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Buidhe (talk) 06:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But I would remove the bright spot in the sky (above the trees just a bit left of the person) -- Llez (talk) 07:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I hope you told him that smoking is bad for his health... Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Water reflection of mountains, hut, green rice sheaves scattered in a paddy field and clouds with blue sky in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2020 at 00:19:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water reflection of mountains, hut, green rice sheaves scattered in a paddy field and clouds with blue sky in Vang Vieng, Laos

File:Caterpillar of Danaus chrysippus (Linnaeus, 1758) – Plain Tiger feeding on Calotropis.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 12:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Blue tiger (Tirumala limniace exoticus) male underside.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 22:32:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue tiger (Tirumala limniace exoticus) male

File:Hummingbird hawk moth (Macroglossum stellatarum) in flight.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 13:28:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hummingbird hawk moth (Macroglossum stellatarum) in flight
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Up to 3 cm I guess. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Mine was a really big oneǃ Oopsǃ Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Congratulations!.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 13:26:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Graduates of the US Military Academy celebratring
  • Yep, I know. Just delivering the info. --Cart (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice dramatic shot but clearly tilted, and quite blurry at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 15:27, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20. Buidhe (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:36, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose All the feet are cut off -- Llez (talk) 07:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Yad Vashem View.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 11:10:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yad Vashem

File:Lichenostomus flavicollis stealing hair from Thylogale billardierii for nest - Melaleuca.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 05:39:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yellow-throated Honeyeater

File:POL COA Trzaska.svg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2020 at 02:02:29
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info There are countless of these coats of arms of same or similar quality either made by Bastianow or deriative of/heavily using elements from his works (See this category or its subcategories) and this one does not stand out from any of them and is nothing special as far as computer generated coats of arms go. (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist As someone interested in royalty and nobility, I have seen numerous CG coats of arms on Commons and the standards for them have come a really really long way in the past 13 years. This image just pales in comparison to the ones created by the likes of Glasshouse, Heralder, and Sodacan, to name a few. --StellarHalo (talk) 02:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist A fine image, but it does not stand out as one of the absolute best examples of CG coat of arms that we have on Commons. Buidhe (talk) 02:15, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img19 Topkapı Palace.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 22:15:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of Queen Mother's Apartments in Topkapı Palace
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Domes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Dome ceiling of the Queen Mother's Apartments in Harem of Topkapı Palace, Istanbul ----- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 22:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 22:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very nice dome, but too much noise for FP. Based on your Photoshop exposure adjustments it looks like you're using the equivalent of ISO 800 or so. -- King of ♥ 22:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful. I wouldn't do any noise reduction to be honest. A fine grain like this is better than a smudgy picture with too much NR. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and agreed with Cmao20 -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really beautiful. A little bit noise is OK for me, because I assume that the dome is quite dark in reality. (If you want to apply additional noise reduction, please be very careful; IMHO a little bit noise is better than soft mush.) --Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Noise is ok to me --Wilfredor (talk) 13:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 07:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Erizo de mar violáceo (Sphaerechinus granularis), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 40.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 18:33:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Purple sea urchin (Sphaerechinus granularis), Madeira, Portugal.

File:Wrocław - widok z Wyspy Slodowej - wyspa Tamka.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 16:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ostrów Tumski, Wroclaw
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Inspired by Andrei's excellent nomination, another lovely image of the city of Wroclaw by Jar.ciurus. Ostrów Tumski ('Cathedral Island') is the oldest part of Wroclaw, consisting of mainly religious buildings dating as far back as the twelfth century. It's a very historic site that also contains the former residence of Nicolaus Copernicus. created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you! --Andrei (talk) 19:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I am seeing a halo effect on the buildings at full size. Buidhe (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Maybe a slight sharpening halo, yes. Not a lot I can do about it without having access to the original RAW files though. IMO it's too minor a flaw to spoil my enjoyment of the picture. Cmao20 (talk) 23:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not perfect in details, but very beautiful and atmospheric. — I wish Jar.ciurus would respond to hints about improving some details in his nice photos – many of them are very good and could be excellent with a little bit of extra work. ;–) Does somebody have an idea how to contact him? --Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Vietnamkrieg Bootsflüchtling 1980.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 12:19:50
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info 2005 promotion (Original nomination), obvious and distracting damage to the original negative without restoration being done. Also, the image would look substantially better with a conversion of the greenish duotone to grayscale and a levels adjustment.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- Buidhe (talk) 12:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Where can we see the original negative? The "Source" link is 404. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
    • The image is also sold by Alamy apparently.[1] where it's credited to "Pictures From History" (which credits the image to CPA media, apparently public domain [2]) Buidhe (talk) 22:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
      • The source website can be found on Wayback Machine[3] but it doesn't have this image on it. Buidhe (talk) 23:02, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the sleuthing. I'll vote to Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist on the basis that nowadays, we'd insist on a digital restoration of the image for anything more than VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Burg Eltz am frühen Morgen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 10:01:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle Eltz

File:Châteaux du Pays cathare - Château de Peyrepertuse - 13.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 09:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the "Old Keep" on the "Keep San Jordi", Château de Peyrepertuse

File:Professor Bill Rutherford FRS.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 09:00:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bill Rutherford

File:مجموعه گنجعلی خان هوایی.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 09:00:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Ganjali Khan Complex, is a Safavid-era building complex, located in the old center of city of Kerman, Iran. The complex is composed of a school, a square, a caravanserai, a bathhouse, an Ab Anbar (water reservoir), a mint, a mosque and a bazaar.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Morteza salehi70 - uploaded by Morteza salehi70 - nominated by Persia -- ahuR ☘ 09:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ahuR ☘ 09:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Description completely lacking --Llez (talk) 09:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment That looks very edited to me, especially all light sources in the scene having the same kind of orange tint to them. I'd need to see the raw file to believe that this is real. --El Grafo (talk) 11:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain The picture looks amazing but I don't feel qualified to pass judgment on the point El Grafo makes. Cmao20 (talk) 16:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is so a description! Don't you folks use Google Translate? "Ganjali Khan School / Ganjali Caravanserai". However, even that doesn't indicate how this presumably aerial picture was taken, nor do the Metadata provide any info about the camera. And what accounts for that color of blue? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have taken the freedom to add a short English description, after comparing the photo to other aerial imagery in order to make sure that it really shows the Ganjali Khan Complex. --Aristeas (talk) 09:49, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:La chaleur à Paris, fillette prenant de l'eau à une borne-fontaine, 1921 - Gallica.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 08:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A little girl and a fountain, Paris, France.

File:Sunset over Trommekilen from Norrkila 6.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2020 at 06:22:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunset over Trommekilen, a part of Brofjorden, as seen from Norrkila, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. In the background is Preemraff oil refinery.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Sweden
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info After taking the photos of the hill with the birds, I was about to pack up and go home when I met some other photographers. We started to chat and it got late. Because of that we were rewarded with the most colorful sunset I've ever seen. It went through all the colors you can think of. Later, three very mosquito-bitten but happy photographers went home with full SD cards. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cart (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Stands out against the wast plentitude of photographs taken around sunset by the not-so-common colouring, the subtle composition and the calm, peaceful atmosphere. (Many photos taken around sunset boast with their many garish colours and seem to cry “Watch me! I am spectacular!”; it is refreshing to see sunset/after sunset photos which present their beauty without crying.) --Aristeas (talk) 11:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but wish the lower left corner were sharper. (What's causing it? There shouldn't be DOF issues at f/5.6 on a 1" sensor.) -- King of ♥ 13:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • I think it's mostly due to that is was a very dark/shadow-y part of the photo and I had to raise the shadows there quite a bit. This camera does not handle really dark areas that well. It is a re-occurring comment on my photos. In this case, I'd rather have a not so sharp area than a dense black blob. (This was taken before a kind user here, I think it was Basotxerri, told me about a function to improve this. I'm using it these days.) --Cart (talk) 15:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas - better for the more subtle colours. Cmao20 (talk) 16:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Looking up at The View From The Shard, Level 72.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 22:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Looking up at The View From The Shard, Level 72
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United_Kingdom
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info At The View from The Shard there are two levels for visitors. A triple-height indoor view at level 68 and a partially open gallery at level 72 (244m). Most guests are looking down at London landmarks. This is what you see if you look up on level 72. All by me. -- Colin (talk) 22:06, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 22:06, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice one, could be some kind of futuristic film poster. Cmao20 (talk) 23:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment For a color photo I'd prefer blue sky here. What do you think about a B&W conversion? The red lines are the only significant bits of color, but you can set them to whatever luminance you want to achieve the desired effect. This would allow you to bump up the contrast greatly to emphasize the shapes and textures without making it look unnatural. -- King of ♥ 23:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Anyways, this is ultimately a matter of personal taste, any version is featurable to me. -- King of ♥ 04:54, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support personally I like the red, although it would be nice to see what this looks like in B&W for comparison. Buidhe (talk) 03:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 05:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reminds me of Martin's photo. It could stand a bit more highlights IMO, but then again, it's London... --Cart (talk) 06:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really good and reminds me of some of the modernistic photos from the 1920s and 30s. I'd like to see a black & white version of this, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 09:29, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --StellarHalo (talk) 12:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  18:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 12:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Pink-spotted hawk moth (Agrius cingulata) male.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 13:29:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pink-spotted hawk moth (Agrius cingulata) male in Panama
  • Might be better to move it to a horizontal or slanted stick for compo. Having it at the end of one like this, brings my mind to moth specimens stuck on pins. --Cart (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Man corona mask-20200505-RM-160216.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 13:23:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Man with prescribed protective mask at the Bamberg railway station
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Man with prescribed protective mask at the Bamberg railway station. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 13:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 13:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent timing. (or did you write that text on the wall and then wait for someone to pass by? :-) ) --Cart (talk) 13:47, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It was pure coincidence. I only discovered the inscription on the monitor when I got home. Sometimes you are lucky. Thanks to all the supporters.--Ermell (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 14:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I already loved this photo when I saw it first in the May photo challenge. Not dramatic as the photos from the hospitals, but it perfectly depicts everyday life in Corona times. --Aristeas (talk) 14:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cropping it tighter to get the pipe out of there might result in a stronger image but I like the picture. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment That pole in front of the bag is distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 09:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The It's Corona Time etching on the wall seals the deal for us all I think. It's subtle but impactful. - Harsh 02:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Harsh. Buidhe (talk) 08:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker der US Army -- 2020 -- 8388.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 13:19:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Door lock of Bunker 26 at the area of the US army at the special ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 13:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It's a detail view of a door lock of a bunker. --XRay talk 13:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 13:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think it would work better without the thin extra details on the sides. A crop along the metal would be more harmonious for me at least. The extra info the sides provide is redundant. --Cart (talk) 13:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • I think you're right. I've the small crop. --XRay talk 14:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It could be a bit sharper, but nice colours and overall a very good idea. Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 20:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Intriguing. Also fixed the gallery since we have other door locks among the door. --Cart (talk) 20:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:16, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Buidhe (talk) 07:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Cmao20 --Llez (talk) 09:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  18:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sure, a good thought, but the form doesn't work for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Hrubý Jeseník in December 2019 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2020 at 09:37:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Czech Republic - Hrubý Jeseník in December 2019
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Czech_Republic
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 09:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 09:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support truly amazing Buidhe (talk) 10:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm less wowed, sorry. I see this kind of scene at home every winter, so for me to support an FP like this one I'd need higher resolution and really crisp quality. This one seems to be losing its detail a bit on the right side.--Peulle (talk) 11:25, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm with Peulle on this one. It's a nice winter photo, but not special in any way, and the plane trails in the sky do nothing for the image. I'm sure that when you took it, the snow was glittering in the sun and the mist in the distance seemed magical, but such things rarely translates well into a photo. It could also be sharper. --Cart (talk) 12:48, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Underexposed. -- King of ♥ 14:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it. Maybe it's a tiny bit low on wow, but the quality is good and I find it nice and atmospheric - I can almost feel the frost! Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The quality is nice and all but this view is just not special enough. --StellarHalo (talk) 23:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

File:20191204 Funambulus pennantii, Agra 0936 6598 DxO.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 17:07:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Northern palm squirrel (Funambulus pennantii) in Agra
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me Jakubhal -- Jakubhal 17:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jakubhal 17:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If you have to feed the squirrel to get a photo, should be easy to get a better PoV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
    • I did not feed it to get this photo, if it matters. -- Jakubhal 05:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose It's very cute and it definitely deserves to be QI. But the background and point of view are a bit so-so as Charles says. It's nice and sharp, but 4.3mpx resolution is not high for an FP these days. Overall if it were twice this resolution I think I'd support, but as it is the image's good points are not quite enough to make it one of the best on Commons to me. Cmao20 (talk) 23:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I just looked through all the squirrel and chipmunk FPs. A lot of them date from the time before 2 MP was the required minimum and some of them should probably be delisted, but I think this stands up well compared to even some relatively recent FPs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Is this downsized Jakubhal? Don't imagine it is croppedIkan Kekek. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
    • Charlesjsharp the picture was taken from the distance about two meters (if I remember it right) and is cropped. Please do no assume anything, like "feeding from hand". I could probably do it and get closer, but when I met this critter it was eating what he found or got earlier and fled when I came closer -- Jakubhal 11:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
      • This is original RAW downsized for comparision. -- Jakubhal 11:25, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
        • Thanks for the explanation. I hadn't noticed the lens you used. I understand now that someone else had just fed it. Feeding these squirrels is ubiquitous in Agra and nearby sights. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
        • From a biased perspective, I think this image is a better FP candidate. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. -- King of ♥ 14:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cmao20 Poco a poco (talk) 18:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Cmao20. These top-down photos of animals are usually not a good idea unless the shadow or something can provide something extra. --Cart (talk) 20:57, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 16:40:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bottom view of the iwan at one of the entrances of Fatima Masumeh Shrine
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good work. --Aristeas (talk) 07:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Amirpashaei: Should we rename this photo to use capital letters, like the other one? Please request the rename to “Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg” or so, then I (or another filemover) can rename it. Thanks! --Aristeas (talk) 09:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
    • @Aristeas: rename it if you can . thanks Mr Aristeas.--Amirpashaei (talk) 10:18, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
      • ✓ Done Moved file according to Amirpashaei’s request. Greetings, --Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support high quality work. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 13:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 14:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is great --Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 21:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DXR (talk) 22:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 09:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Ceiling of a shabestan in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 16:36:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of a shabestan in Fatima Masumeh Shrine, Qom, Iran
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 16:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 16:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Lovely image, but it's cut off so you can't see the entire ceiling. For a featured picture I expect that the entire subject is captured. Buidhe (talk) 22:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I get Buidhe's point, but, as Ikan Kekek often says, painters make crops like this all the time. In any case, for a 93mpx image with good quality even at immense full size, I don't feel inclined to complain. Cmao20 (talk) 23:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support maybe fix the file name to include capitals? --Andrei (talk) 07:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
    • @Andrew J.Kurbiko: I fixed that in caption but I can't change the main file name.--Amirpashaei (talk) 07:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
      • ✓ Done move as author request, as I am a file mover. Buidhe (talk) 09:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 07:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I would prefer a square crop with all circles included. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 13:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 14:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 18:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:25, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 09:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Moderate Symbol support vote.svg Support: I would prefer to see more above and below the crops, but they're symmetrical and the result is beautiful and quite high-resolution. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Silek Harimau.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 12:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Erisonjkambari - uploaded by Erisonjkambari - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Well composed, but the main fighter is really unsharp. --Cayambe (talk) 13:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose So sorry to oppose both these very dramatic photos you have nominated. They are both really good in their own way, but the technicals are not up to FP standard. The trouble with this one is that in an action shot like this the subject - the fighter holding the knife - should be sharp, but it's clearly out of focus there. There is a bit of blue CA going on too, but not enough to oppose by itself. Cmao20 (talk) 14:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose +1.--Peulle (talk) 11:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Mahout dan gajah menyemburkan air dari belalainya ke arah pohon, CRU Samponiet.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 12:13:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Indonesia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Hendrapictures - uploaded by Hendrapictures - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very sad to see a wondefull composition with severals problems like low exposure, chromatic aberration and out of focus. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose This is an amazing photo but regretfully I have to oppose because the quality is not at FP level. There are quite a lot of oversharpening haloes, a degree of motion blur (see the movement of the man standing atop the elephant), and as Wilfredor says a lot of chromatic aberration. It's a real shame though as it is a stunning composition. Cmao20 (talk) 14:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It’s a pity – the low exposure and CAs etc. could be fixed, but the unsharpness and/or motion blur of the man and the elephant probably not. --Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I suspect these technical issues may be the result of an HDR composite made with two misaligned frames, rather than the result of over sharpening, motion blur and chromatic aberration. If that's the case, perhaps Hendrapictures can reprocess the original raw files? Bonus points for taking the opportunity for brightening up the sky as well :) Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Hendrapictures please, if you need help, let me know, this image is too good to be lost --Wilfredor (talk) 13:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

File:2019-03-16 03 Aquaculture in Chile.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 10:08:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Chile
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by GRDN711 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Buidhe (talk) 10:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Resolution is a bit low, but the light makes up for it IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice light. -- Colin (talk) 20:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting photo and a good composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per previous speakers. --Aristeas (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral IMO the sharpness should be better. Why f/5.6? --XRay talk 13:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral To answer XRay's point, they probably used a polarizer. Why else would you need ISO 400 with an exposure setting of 1/250s at f/5.6? ISO 800 is venturing into dangerous territory for a landscape so f/5.6 is probably the best compromise. I think the technical quality is fine given the wow, but the sky looks weird; unfortunately you just can't use a polarizer on such a wide frame of view. -- King of ♥ 14:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 21:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Imo 1600px on the short edge is pretty low, in particular for a 7 image panorama made with a high quality camera, yet the image does not appear overly sharp. I also don't find the subject / composition overly interesting, although the light is quite nice. --DXR (talk) 22:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Pine trees growing on the slope of Cinder Cone.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2020 at 02:21:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pine trees growing on the slope of Cinder Cone, a 700 foot high volcanic cone of loose scoria in Lassen Volcanic National Park
  • Related anecdote: In the back of my head is a painting of a similar motif, probably now in Tate, MoMA or some such place. I did a Google picture search to see if I could locate it. No such luck. The system identified this as "grass" and promptly redirected me to Günter Grass. Probably the most worthless search I've ever done. Face-tongue.svg Still, it looks like a painting in a national art gallery. --Cart (talk) 09:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent minimalist design -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 10:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent quality. Cmao20 (talk) 14:46, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Outstanding minimalism --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 20:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poetic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Although I agree with the others in terms of quality and wow factor, the categories need species ID for me to support this.--Peulle (talk) 11:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 13:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is an abstract image, not a species identification photo; no one would ever use this picture to illustrate an article on the species. So I don't view ID as a requirement (but if you can, it would of course be even better). -- King of ♥ 14:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --DXR (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  18:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I thought at first it was some weeds Cart had found growing in a parking lot somewhere (which I would have supported just as readily). Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

File:American officer and French partisan crouch behind an auto during a street fight in a French city. - NARA - 531322 - restored by Buidhe.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 20:41:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

NARA caption: "American officer and French partisan crouch behind an auto during a street fight in a French city."
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1950
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by unknown US Army Signal Corps photographer - uploaded by National Archives bot - restored and nominated by Buidhe. High historical value as it is used as the lead image of the article on the French Resistance on wikidata and in several Wikipedia languages (English, Spanish, Czech at minimum), and also the cover of a book (a different version of the image). I have benefitted from Adam Cuerden's helpful comments at the enwiki FPC. -- Buidhe (talk) 20:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Buidhe (talk) 20:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Indeed a striking photograph, and on a somewhat less grim subject than Nazi propaganda. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 10:42, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unfortunately the whole world is currently checked into the Hotel Corona. Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is obviously a posed photo. As per Nick-D's argument here. --Gnosis (talk) 06:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
    • I disagree that a staged photograph necessarily lacks EV. This one is widely used, so many people clearly think it is valuable. This painting does not accurately depict the Battle of Austerlitz, rather it is a staged composition, but it is used as the lead image because we have no better images to use. We already have at least one featured picture of staged World War II fighting. I submit that this case is much the same, as it is dangerous to take photographs when combat is actually occurring. Should we delist Adam Cuerden's opera posters because they are promotional, not particularly realistic, and don't necessarily offer an accurate representation of the opera in progress? (t · c) buidhe 21:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
    A staged photo doesn't have any historic significant, can't compare to a painting! sorry --Gnosis (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose. The posing photo can be beautiful and very convincing. However, here is the posing, which i can immediately see only the fake. People in the background ruined this shot, sorry -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 09:26, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looking back years, decades or centuries later a staged picture can tell more about the times than regular photos. This one definitely does. -- KennyOMG (talk) 10:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
A high proportion of combat photos from World War II were posed, but usually not as blatantly as this one. --Gnosis (talk) 17:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
This is not Wikipedia Featured Pictures but Commons Featured Pictures. Whether an image carries any EV or historical significance, or even accuracy, should quite frankly be irrelevant (unless it adds to the image's value ofc). Having said that I'd actually argue that this image carries significant historical value as it represents how the allies tried/wanted to portray this part of WWII. -- KennyOMG (talk) 22:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per George Chernilevsky, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 16:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Nice restoration but the posing makes the photo not at all convincing in what it is trying to portray. Sorry. --StellarHalo (talk) 23:06, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 12:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, posing becomes something you can't unsee and in fact makes you laugh. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Tongariro02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 20:33:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Painted Dunes and Fantastic Lava Beds (upright).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 17:54:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Painted Dunes and Fantastic Lava Beds as seen from the edge of Cinder Cone’s crater.

File:Erste Frühlinsboten IMG 4059.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 16:55:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Stacks of lobster traps in Norra Grundsund 7.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 11:43:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stacks of lobster traps and ropes in Norra Grundsund
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cart (talk) 11:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:55, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 13:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 13:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love the composition and colours. Cmao20 (talk) 16:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 17:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I find this a beautiful composition, too. I'm a little surprised no-one thinks it's "chaotic" or "too busy", though, because it has a very active and complex arabesque, and similarly complex forms have gotten panned here. Maybe the fact that most of it is composed of one kind of rope that's mostly of one color makes it more palatable to more of you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • The whole scene makes me think of a waterfall with swirls and vortexes down in the pond and people tend to find such things beautiful even though they are quite complex. --Cart (talk) 18:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Understood. It's a pretty complex series of flows, though. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Taufliege (Drosophila melanogaster)-20200607-RM-210232.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 10:46:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Christening fly in a garden in Bamberg. Focus stack of 11 pictures

File:Meyerbeer - Les Huguenots - Décor Acte II.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2020 at 06:44:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Les Huguenots Act II
IMHO, To correct this, a rotation without loss of proportion should be done and not only add a sharpness filter --Wilfredor (talk) 20:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Cistus (zonneroosjesfamilie.) 14-06-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2020 at 15:11:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Answer: The diameter of the flower in this photo is ± 40 mm.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you. Impressive sharpness, considering the size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 11:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do not see what's so impressive about this. Sharpness is OK but not great for a 4cm flower. Composition, lighting, exposure, subject, bokeh – all OK but not great. Sorry, but top me this looks like "just another flower mugshot". --El Grafo (talk) 10:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:58, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Estrella espinosa común (Marthasterias glacialis), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-31, DD 57.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2020 at 09:13:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Exemplar of Spiny starfish (Marthasterias glacialis), Garajau Marine Nature Reserve, Madeira, Portugal.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Asteroidea
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Exemplar of Spiny starfish (Marthasterias glacialis), Garajau Marine Nature Reserve, Madeira, Portugal. Note: this is not an aquarium image but and underwater shot, of which have very few in Commons. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 09:13, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 09:13, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think File:Estrella espinosa común (Marthasterias glacialis), Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-30, DD 03.jpg is better. The contrast and colours are better, the lighting less harsh, and the creature is closer to the plane of focus. Whereas in the nomination, the creature is at about 45° and so the front and rear legs are out of focus even at screen size. I know the nom is higher resolution and the other one could do with a bit of vertical crop. I wonder what Charles could do with it wrt the Topaz AI sharpening from raw? -- Colin (talk) 09:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have 'treated' a number of Poco a poco's RAW images so he has been able to assess the software. Topaz works best on the best images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:10, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose shallow depth of field, is there any particular reason for f/5,6? --EV Raudtee (talk) 15:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
    EV Raudtee I imagine that your question is sarcastic as you have already rendered a judgement. So, what camera settings whould you have chosen at 15m depth? Poco a poco (talk) 21:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Could be sharper but IMO good for an underwater photo at this resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 17:01, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not the sharpest, but difficult shot under water. The light works for me, subject well isolated from its background -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others after considerable reflection. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:58, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:El Tres de Mayo, by Francisco de Goya, from Prado thin black margin.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2020 at 11:32:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Third of May 1808
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Unlikely to be part of the painting. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Why do you think so? The frame is gilded and the black line is not straight. Goya must have messed up a bit on his canvas. StellarHalo (talk) 12:10, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • What expertise do you have to suggest Goya must have messed up a bit on his canvas. You should be wary of off-the-cuff analysis. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • The "black line" is most likely the gap between the paining itself and the frame. Old paintings with the canvas stretched on a wooden frame, that might not have been perfectly straight and rectangular to begin with, get warped when the wood dries. In a lot of cases the painting and the frame don't match up perfectly and gaps appear. Some frames are made to cover a small portion of the paining's edges, some are not. In this case, it looks like the frame might not have been a perfect fit for the painting to begin with. --Cart (talk) 13:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. I think Cart's explanation for the frame is probably the right one. Cmao20 (talk) 16:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks to explanation from Cart. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportIf you'd care to nominate this over on en:WP:FPC as well, please do so. An excellent choice. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:56, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 09:24, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 10:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 05:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Habonim-Dor Beach.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2020 at 09:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • @W.carter: I already did that, maybe "purging" will help. --Ivar (talk) 12:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yep, Ivar, thanks! I forgot to do that. Need coffee. --Cart (talk) 12:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment now neutal per Colin's comments. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice! --Basotxerri (talk) 14:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support though perhaps a bit of liberty has been taken with the WB for dramatic effect. -- King of ♥ 16:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 16:02, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very noticeable that the sky is darkened (whether it is with a filter or in post) but I like the effect still, and it doesn't ruin the dramatic composition. - Benh (talk) 17:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As Benh notes, the sky appears to have a strong graduated filter applied. I hate the effect. It's corny and looks unreal. -- Colin (talk) 17:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Benh and others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Red neutral Overprocessed. I also noticed the darkened sky before Benh's comment, and this confirms my impression. The more I look at it, the more it bugs me. The picture has potential (despite the low DoF), but currently it's too artificial -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ---Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 05:56, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose to prevent speedy promotion. I agree with Colin and Basile. The graduated filter is really obvious and it makes an impressive photo look overprocessed to me. Cmao20 (talk) 16:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Great, but it’s a pity about the sky. --Aristeas (talk) 17:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cmao20, otherwise great shot Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I wish this could have been done without the filter; however the sky is not the subject, the wrecked ship is. Daniel Case (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 21:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20 --DXR (talk) 22:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Adliswil Werdsteg dawn.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2020 at 08:19:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Werdsteg in Adliswil, Switzerland, right before dawn
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Switzerland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 08:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is quite a simple image, but I really like the light and the general mood. -- Domob (talk) 08:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice mood. Cmao20 (talk) 16:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice but I find it a little bit too ordinary, sorry. Perhaps if the foreground would be more interesting, it could work but that grassy patch just doesn't wow me. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Podzemnik. This photo is nice, but I don't find the composition great. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with others -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Podzemnik --EV Raudtee (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Busy composition and posterized reflections. Daniel Case (talk) 23:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Wochenspruch der NSDAP 11 January 1943.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 10:46:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nazi wall newspaper, Wochenspruch der NSDAP, issue of 11 January 1943. These posters were widely displayed in wartime Germany.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Werner von Axster-Heudtlass - restored and uploaded by Buidhe - nominated by Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 10:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Buidhe (talk) 10:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Pretty chilling stuff. The quality seems good so I think this can make a good if unpleasant historical FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agreed. High quality print and scan, striking, and worth a feature. It's important to understand how propaganda in the service of evil can be artful and effective. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others. Important historical documentation.--Peulle (talk) 22:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 01:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above. Chilling, yes. --Cayambe (talk) 06:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose until a proper description has been added that explains what this is. You've got to be kidding me: I can't believe that the only content of the decription of a file at Commons is an un-commented, verbatim Goebbels quote. Given that educational value seems to be the major reason for support here, we better make sure it actually has educational value. Keep in mind that this will become eligible for POTY voting. This is not just another painting of a random historical figure. This is not something you can have sitting around without context. --El Grafo (talk) 08:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
    • @El Grafo: The quote is the text displayed on the poster; I've expanded the description with more information about the publication. There are a lot of issues of this periodical, many of which are public domain (most of those can be found in Wochenspruch der NSDAP) however, in my opinion this is the one with the most "wow factor". I would not support this for POTY. Buidhe (talk) 08:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • That's good information. Could you include all of that in German, too? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Sadly I can read German but not write it. Buidhe (talk) 09:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Very nice, that's the kind of information I'd expect from a FP candidate file description page. Thank you, and apologies for my strong language. I might be able to translate this into German later if I find a quiet moment. --El Grafo (talk) 11:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Here is a "neutral" description indifferent. --Neptuul (talk) 10:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question What would you like to add to the description? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • I'd agree that that context would improve the description. I'm not sure it's essential, but it's certainly helpful. Buidhe, would you like to add a sentence or two with links? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • there is a dead link and a vexing chronological order, I will fix it this evening. But I agree with the argument: Must this realy be a FP? --Neptuul (talk) 07:04, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I generally do not think that a quote by Göring deserves to be "featured" anywhere. --Andrei (talk) 21:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question As a Jew who knows of dozens of relatives who were murdered by the Nazis in Poland, should I agree with you? For whatever reason, I don't, but I agree with the fruitful efforts to provide more context. I guess the question is whether by featuring this photo, we honor the man or his party. And I don't think saying that this is one of the best photos on the site and showing how propaganda in service of evil can be effective, we are thereby doing the equivalent of erecting an equestrian statue to Robert E. Lee in the public square. I had more trouble with a nomination of a photo of an equestrian statue of Khmelnitsky, because that is an existing heroic statue that is currently in the public square and honors a notorious Jew-killer. This would be a photo of a document by a party that is blessedly out of power in Germany and Austria. But I think the crux of the issue can be reduced to this: Is a photo of an immoral document itself inherently immoral? I don't think so, but I respect the argument that by featuring the photo, we risk promoting the contents of the document. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • I've always believed that FP should be for any images that illustrate a subject particularly well, while POTD/POTY are for images that we are proud to display as a community. Certain types of FPs should not make it into the main page IMO, such as those depicting criminals, graphic violence, or sexual acts. -- King of ♥ 04:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Khmelnitsky ended up being POTD for 2020-08-24. I do not want such kind of material to be given a platform here. This poster is already VI, on my opinion its more than enough. --Andrei (talk) 07:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • I surely respect your opinion on this. I recused myself from voting on one of the nominations of a photo of that equestrian statue because it wasn't clear to me that on the basis of quality and composition, it should be opposed, but I couldn't support portraying a heroic statue of him neutrally while the image of the statue itself seemed to honor him. However, I feel like this is different in context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you, Ikan! --Andrei (talk) 11:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Ikan and Peulle. -- B2Belgium (talk) 07:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question looking at the file history, how did the file got "enhanced" from 1,790 × 2,584 to 2,863 × 4,084? Was a new source found somewhere? If so, if should be indicated. Renata3 (talk) 18:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
    • @Renata3: Nope, I just figured out how to download the highest quality version from the same website. Buidhe (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This image shows the poster as it is, without anything that puts it into the historic context. So it can (and probably will) easily get into the wrong hands. --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:04, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
I understand your concern, but I think that those wrong hands will probably get on it without our help, if they haven't already. Daniel Case (talk) 15:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I honestly think that the context of this - a cry to finish the job then, not leave it to the descendants, and how it can only be seen in a limited range of contexts that all help put a lie to the common myth that the general public was not aware of the Holocaust - I think the encyclopedic value outweighs any remaining propoganda value. I would suggest POTD is very careful with descriptions (Buidhe has said it should be pulled from POTY consideration above, so as long as the POTY organisers are informed of that, I think we can ignore this issue), but I think that, as long as a certain amount of care is taken, this sort of thing is valuable. Buidhe has been working hard to write, in an appropriate, academic, not-being-a-Nazi manner, about aspects of the history of Naziism over on en-Wiki, and this sort of visual evidence is helpful to such articles.
Obviously, there are reasons to be careful with such things. Our goal is to educate about, not accidentally promote. But I think this is about as good of an illustrative example as one can hope for, and - although perhaps I might be naive here - I don't see how it could be used to promote modern neo-Naziism, as it's very much of its time. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amusing that Göring is made to look so leaderly and heroic here rather than the Jabba-esque figure he had become by then.

    Since everyone seems to be weighing in on the morality of featuring this, I will, in addition to seconding Peulle and Ikan, note that it makes us think about propaganda and how easily it can sway people, including us. The quote, outside of its historical context, is something almost any politician could say, and many have (including, I think, John F. Kennedy) and which in many other contexts many of us here would not disagree with (In fact, this is basically one of the arguments for addressing climate change now).

    It also shows (like the Pernkopf atlas, an article which I did a lot of work on) how artistic talent can be harnessed to execrable causes. Daniel Case (talk) 15:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Have hesitated for a few days, but Ikan, Adam, and Daniel are right. --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Alright, I've slept over this a couple of times and I think that this is now in a state where it can be featured. --El Grafo (talk) 10:27, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For good articles, we need good images of both heroes and villains. I know, I was involved in getting a drawing of Kim Jong-un before we had a photo. Good illustrations are always a premium however distasteful the subject. --Cart (talk) 13:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Münster, Hafen, ehem. Schüttvorrichtung -- 2020 -- 8064.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 04:12:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Former bulk bin (“Elephant”) in the port, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 04:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 04:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 09:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support not without technical flaws (highlight recovery artifacts on high contrast edges) but I like Star Wars and the sandcrawler enough to support this - Benh (talk) 09:51, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 13:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 15:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well done. Cmao20 (talk) 16:16, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 20:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 13:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Per Benh, I get the Star Wars idea, but that's not enough to sustain this as an FP and the background is kind of busy. Also, there's still CA on the roofline to the left, and a lot of this isn't that sharp. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I'll have a look to the CAs. --XRay talk 04:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done It should be better now. --XRay talk 12:13, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 21:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Germany

File:Water reflection of the mountains of Vang Vieng with crepuscular rays.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 03:15:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water reflection of the mountains of Vang Vieng with crepuscular rays

Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

File:Front view of a stream with a tree as vanishing point, mountains and mist in the countryside of Vang Vieng.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 03:17:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Front view of a stream with a tree as vanishing point, mountains and mist in the countryside of Vang Vieng
  • Spotted :-) Fixed. Thanks, Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • You bet. These are two particularly lovely nominations. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent composition and atmosphere. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 20:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 06:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 15:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A little busier than I'd like, but the underlying idea behind the composition is spot-on. -- King of ♥ 15:45, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose A great idea that almost works for me but for the oddly cropped puddle at left. Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice mood and composition in my view. --Domob (talk) 08:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Laos