Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:CID Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | հայերեն | +/−

Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.

Formalidades[edit]

Nominación[edit]

Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas, entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.

Crear una nueva nominación[edit]

Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.


Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.

Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}

Para votar[edit]

Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question).

Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.

Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.

Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.

Reglas[edit]

  • Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
  • Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
  • Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
  • Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
  • Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.

La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:

  • estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
  • que haya un mínimo de cinco votos a favor
  • que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)

Contents


Recarga para nuevas nominaciones: purge this page's cache

Propuestas[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Branches of a Ficus kurzii reflecting in the water at Singapore Botanic Gardens.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 01:40:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Branches of a 150 year-old Ficus kurzii (Burmese Banyan) reflecting in the water of the Swan Lake, at Singapore Botanic Gardens

File:Park Royal on Pickering at dusk from Hong Lim Park Singapore.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 01:47:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Park Royal on Pickering at dusk from Hong Lim Park Singapore

File:CSIO4 Linzer Pferdefestival 2017-Thomas Velin-Chopin van het Moleneind-6116.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2018 at 18:48:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Superb capture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KTC (talk) 22:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice watch :-) Though more space at the bottom would have been better. And the whites are a bit too gray in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Nürnberg St. Lorenz Dreikönigsaltar Geburt 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2018 at 10:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nativity by Hans Pleydenwurff

File:Giechburg Abendlicht P1103921efs.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2018 at 23:05:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Giechburg near Bamberg

File:Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2018 -- 1618 (bw).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2018 at 18:16:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Horse muzzle of Dülmen ponies in the Merfelder Bruch bei Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 18:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It's black-and-white, yes. IMO black-and-white improves the details better than the colored version. And it is taken with a large focal length, because it is a wild horse. You can't touch them, a minimal distance is necessary. --XRay talk 18:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 18:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This DoF isn't working for me.--Peulle (talk) 20:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 04:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition doesn't work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

File:40. Schwimmzonen- und Mastersmeeting Enns 2017 100m Brust Damen-9834.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2018 at 18:09:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Breaststroke contest in Enns

File:Lobby hall with couches and chandelier at The Fullerton Bay Hotel Singapore.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2018 at 07:48:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Symmetric view of the spacious lobby hall with couches and giant chandelier reflecting on the floor at The Fullerton Bay Hotel, Singapore
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks, Ikan, for the nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • My pleasure, and the noise reduction made the photo even better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 15:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow --Isiwal (talk) 16:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very immaculate lobby. It is a shame it wasn't taken from the absolute centre and so the photo isn't symmetrical. HDR might have kept some more detail in the window frame area (though they sky should still be blown in a JPG). -- Colin (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Finally a hotel lobby we can all like ... Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:13, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Is this stitched? There are reflections at the shiny floor which look like stitching errors. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • To me it looks more like the floor sections/boards are a bit uneven, reflecting the light at slightly different angles. --Cart (talk) 10:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • No stitching, I confirm. Wide angle used here. No editing of any kind either on this picture. So just a normal reflection on irregular tiles -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks for explanations. Very good image indeed! --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Roof of auditorium in Beacon Park, British Columbia, Canada 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2018 at 07:41:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Roof of auditorium in Beacon Park, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada

File:Obernberg am Inn Adlerwarte Rotmilan-0136.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2018 at 19:35:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Milvus milvus
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created - uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 22:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The light is great, the colors wonderful, unfortunately a main element bothering me at first sight is the chain-link fence in the background, immediately identifiable despite the blur. The bird seems enclosed, even if it's just an impression, it's enough to break the feeling of freedom a flying animal naturally evokes. But much more distracting than this is the low depth of field. F/2,8 at 200 mm is far too low. Only the eyes are in focus, the beak is completely blurry. (Beside, the left part would gain being cut to be more balanced) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support-- Fence makes nice pattern Seven Pandas (talk) 13:32, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 15:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ...and off course I love my babies even when they are considered not to be handsome :-) --Isiwal (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Although I think it could be cropped in more on the left, squaring it up. Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Basile is misunderstanding: This is the Red Kite of Emancipation standing guard at the fence. It was developed by Great Britain, Spain, France, and Italy (and sold to Germany and Poland) [1] in order to replace the outdated Bald Eagles of Freedom they imported from the US 40 Years ago. It was a prestige project that took longer than expected, but now the first couple has been deployed for active duty. SCNR :-P
But seriously, somehow I like the pattern in the background. And although I'd like a little bit more DOF, the beak is not an issue for me. Also, please don't cut it, every close crop I tried ended up being too crammed.--El Grafo (talk) 08:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 11:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose background Charles (talk) 15:03, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I love the facial expression, and I'm OK with the chain link fence in the background (why not? there are wild things near fences), but I'm really not OK with the blurry beak being the frontmost thing I see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:04, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Viking Sky (ship, 2017) - Sète - December 2018.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2018 at 19:08:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Viking Sky (ship, 2017)

File:Coast at Chinamada - Tenerife 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2018 at 08:55:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coast at Chinamada, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 08:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I might wish for a little more sky above the land on the right, but I love the rocks, with all their shapes and colors. I advise you all not to pixel-peep at full size. The photo looks great at 3x my 13-inch laptop monitor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:59, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:11, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well captured. I know the place. --Cayambe (talk) 18:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Since the sun was clearly obscured Face-smile.svg, or more likely occulted, by clouds, the softness isn't really a problem because of reduced contrast. In fact, combined with the high saturation it gives the whole image a slightly dreamlike quality ... Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing extra. Normal good photo. -- Karelj (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special -- S. DÉNIEL (talk) 11:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm sure that was a breathtaking view IRL, but it doesn't really come across like that in the photograph. --El Grafo (talk)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm afraid I agree with El Grafo -- MartinD (talk) 18:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk)

File:Inzell 2017 Kat A1 ZBYSZEK Kunert -9513.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2018 at 17:00:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Reformierte Kirche Waltensburg (d.j.b.) 12.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2018 at 16:43:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings. Pipe organ.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Reformierte Kirche Waltensburg. The church of Waltensburg was built in the 11th century as a chapel on the site of a pre-Romanesque hall building with an existing tower. Pipes from it pipe organ with beautiful frescoes in the background.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The cut plant suggests a part of the organ is also missing at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Answer: The photo is taken from the keyboard upwards. The organ pipes are the main motif.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Cherry Resort inside Temi Tea Garden, Namchi, Sikkim.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2018 at 16:26:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cherry Resort inside Temi Tea Garden, Namchi, Sikkim
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cherry Resort inside Temi Tea Garden, Namchi, Sikkim
  • All by -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 16:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 16:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice view but the colors seem oversaturated, and the fields are not very sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Saturation dialled down. Image taken at f/8 at 1/200 sec, so sharpest setting of the lens with very low chance of body movement during the shot. However kit lens may have a limitation on absolute sharpness achievable at the sides/corners. However did some local sharpening adjustments. Hope it addresses the sharpness in the field issue - Subhrajyoti07 talk 02:42, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Improved. But f/8 "the sharpest" setting works at the focus area only. At f/11 or f/13 obviously you get more depth, thus more details over the surface of such landscape -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Agreed Subhrajyoti07 talk 13:46, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nonetheless; sharpness on left side really needs work. Ambitious, though. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely composition. Sharpness is not *that* bad IMO. -- King of ♠ 04:45, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per King. Since this photo is not meant mainly to show the precise features of tea plants, we can judge it a bit more like a landscape painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:25, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 11:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent picture! MartinD (talk) 18:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk)

File:Leones (Panthera leo) deborando un búfalo africano negro (Syncerus caffer caffer), parque nacional de Chobe, Botsuana, 2018-07-28, DD 94-96 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2018 at 11:02:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pack of lions (Panthera leo) devoring an African buffalo (Syncerus caffer caffer), Chobe National Park, Botswana.
@Ikan Kekek: Pretty much. If a new lion takes over, he not only kills the other lions, but the lions those lions fathered. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Not so. He might kill very young cubs. Charles (talk) 15:05, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seems to be some slight motion blur, but that's the lions' fault, not the photographer's. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Local editing errors on the top right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
    Basile ✓ gone --Poco2 11:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lighting too harsh. Charles (talk) 18:25, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
    Yes, Charles, at 8:15 a.m. We must have tons of images like this with this resolution and this moment, please, nom you then one that deserves FP --Poco2 19:27, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Stift Wilhering Kirche Deckenfresko 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2018 at 09:10:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling fresco at Wilhering Abbey Church
I plan also to nominate either the one you mention, or maybe some alternative I am still working on. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support There is room for improvement in terms of symmetry when comparing both sides, still great quality and a very nice motif Poco2 11:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support- Anisha Maharjan (talk) 11:24, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Qualified support It's a little distorted and unsharp at the corners, but that's something that seems to be unavoidable when shooting vaulted ceilings. Daniel Case (talk) 21:46, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:46, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 19:12, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:28, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Snowy road Sosonka 2017 G1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2018 at 20:05:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The snow-covered road from Sosonka village to the highway M21 Vinnytsia–Kyiv

File:Kuzhenkino TverObl asv2018-08 img08.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2018 at 12:28:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kuzhenkino railway station
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Russia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Kuzhenkino railway station near Bologoye, Tver Oblast: 1900s wooden architecture, Cultural Heritage ----- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 12:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 12:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:16, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe the transformer on the left side could be cropped or cloned out, but otherwise a great pic. -- -donald- (talk) 07:15, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice railway station but the cropped power post just spoils it --Poco2 11:16, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Reluctant oppose per Poco. I think this building could be the subject of a featured image, but not from this angle. Daniel Case (talk) 14:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Carrie Chapman Catt - National Woman's Party Records.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2018 at 06:21:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Carrie Chapman Catt
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info credited to the Joint Suffrage Procession Committee - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Given that the original print was 4 x 5.5 inches, blowing it up to any larger than the default size on my screen when I open it is a mistake. It's a very good portrait at its original size. However, I'd suggest noting the original size in your file description. The information can be seen here (duly linked in the file description). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:58, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
      • @Ikan Kekek: That won't be quite right, of course, as it's cropped a little bit (truncated oval to rectangle with a little added background. Doesn't really remove or add anything of note due to the chiaroscuro fadeout on her, but I really loathed that part of the original layout). Anyway, having done that, there was a lot of empty space at the bottom, and I believe the right, so the area shown will be significantly smaller. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC) Oh, wait, I have the pixel values. I can give the size of the area shown no problem. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:47, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Added to description, with an explanation of the calculations in a note. 14:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 24.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 23:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stained-glass window of the church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez, Aveyron, France

File:Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 20.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 23:03:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez, Aveyron, France
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I love the church, and I have a lot more tolerance for parked cars as part of an urban landscape than most other FPC voters, but the cars, temporary fencing, pile of scrap metal for recycling (I think that's what it is), poles and so forth are just too distracting for me to consider this other than a very good QI/VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me the cloud background makes it. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'm surprised. I thought you'd be the first to object to the cars, etc. I like the clouds, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
I don't really think you can do much about the cars etc. They are also pretty small in relation to the church. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Hipopótamos (Hippopotamus amphibius), parque nacional de Chobe, Botsuana, 2018-07-28, DD 79.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 22:37:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hippos (Hippopotamus amphibius), Chobe National Park, Botswana.

File:Bruderwald Nebel 286411.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 21:31:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fog in the Bruderwald natural forest reserve

File:Seine et Musée du Louvre Paris.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 20:51:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seine et Musée du Louvre Paris.jpg
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Paris in a way it has always been at this time of year, yet I had not seen and appreciated until now. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Lovely, great work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:17, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Seven Pandas (talk) 23:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose high quality for sure but I'm not that thrilled about the angle/perspective... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Leaning out, and maybe some minor stitching errors at the signs of Pont du Carrousel --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done @Uoaei1: and @Ermell: Uploaded a corrected version. Thanks for the precious hints --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:03, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You solved the problem quite well but there are two stitching errors visible. See annotation.--Ermell (talk) 13:18, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
        • ✓ Done Don't trust those stiching machines. Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately the verticals in the middle and left are not correct. In addition there are some stitching errors.--Ermell (talk) 08:19, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per other --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:13, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wrong stitching. The horizontal is broken here. And compression could be stronger without most (everyone?) not seeing the differnce. - Benh (talk) 19:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
    • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question @Benh: could you please be more clear and more specific --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 01:22, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Kreuzberg (Rhön) im Nebelmeer.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 19:09:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rhön Mountains looking out of the fog about 30 minutes before sunset.


Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Natural phenomena#fog

File:Egon Schiele - Eduard Kosmack - 4702 - Österreichische Galerie Belvedere.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2018 at 15:58:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of Eduard Kosmack by Egon Schiele

File:Ghostscript Tiger.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2018 at 18:19:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tiger from the Ghostscript examples
This is in scope, because it is a very important example picture of PostScript, see de:PostScript#Verbreitung --Habitator terrae 🌍 11:20, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ordinary clip art, nothing special -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This file, in EPS file format, was one of the most interesting examples packed with many (all?) Ghostscript distributions in the 1990s. It was really impressive to see the PS code rendered as a tiger picture ;–). On my old Quadra 840AV this took quite some seconds. Good old times! ;–) … Today, of course, there is nothing special anymore about this graphics. IMHO it is of historical interest only — really nice for an article about Ghostscript or PostScript or the history of computer graphics. I do not know: Do we “feature” such images of almost purely historical value? If yes, this is a good candidate. --Aristeas (talk) 19:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Historic photos can be featured, but if they aren't considered good enough for FP, they can be nominated at COM:VIC. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:31, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well, at the moment all of this is not apparent to the reader – the file description page would need to provide a bit more in-depth information. Feels kind of weird to use SVG for a historic Postscript example, btw. --El Grafo (talk) 09:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:45, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Common and easy to do --Photographer 19:30, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Bergtocht van Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië) 25.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2018 at 16:13:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects #Tree stump.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Whimsically shaped partially decayed tree stump, covered with lichensin the Stelvio National Park (Italy).
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:13, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:13, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 00:22, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I read in the notes that this stump is consumed by many different organisms that, I believe, designed interesting textures on the wood. I wonder if taking a close up of selected parts of the wood would create some interesting artistic design, for example like this one [1] As i can see you are often walking in the woods and finding interesting stumps or consumed trees should be easy. Have you ever thought going macro instead of catching general photos? I am sure it would give you big satisfactions, as your fantasy could find hundreds of interesting subjects. In this particular photo I would have chosen a very shallow depth of field, leaving the background completely out of focus and avoided that grass in the foreground. With a very shallow dof the wood would be standing in the composition, as the background is not so much interesting.Paolobon140 (talk) 09:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Paolobon's implication that this would be better as, perhaps, a tighter closeup on the stump surface. As it is there's just too much going on here to easily settle on one subject. Daniel Case (talk) 15:53, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose better, no FP-potential --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - It's a matter of taste, but this composition doesn't speak to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:33, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with S. Déniel Poco2 11:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Bergtocht van Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië) 25 A.jpg

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- like too Seven Pandas (talk) 21:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Much more interesting composition, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:11, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Like too -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I'll have to disagree. This feels utterly crammed to me, I like the original much better. --El Grafo (talk) 14:58, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per El Grafo. Yann (talk) 19:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support Still not perfect, but the texture is nice. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose no FP-potential --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But i find the other more interesting --Llez (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with S. Déniel Poco2 11:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Vittoriano vittoria alata Roma.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2018 at 08:48:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winged Victory column in the Altare della Patria in Rome.

File:Ida Husted Harper photograph by Aime Dupont.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2018 at 10:15:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ida Husted Harper
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Aimé Dupont - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice portrait, excellent restoration. --Yann (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 11:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ezarateesteban 20:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seven Pandas (talk) 00:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm pretty sure the lady wouldn't agree with her orange peel face. Is that from the restoration or is that on the original already so. No FP for me.--Ermell (talk) 09:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
    • @Ermell: That's film grain, I believe. Every photo I've seen from about this time has that sort of thing to some extent. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:18, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tozina (talk) 18:29, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support (assuming that the “orange peel” is film grain, as Adam explained ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The Library of Congress digital ID you give goes to a "Handle System Error Report Form" for a broken link, so please correct it if you can. It's hard for me to tell what the original dimensions of the photo are. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:03, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
    • @Ikan Kekek: Oh, yeah, the division=mss thing. I'm so used to the tag just working. It's fixed now. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:06, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Thanks. And now that I know the original size: Her face is crinkly at the original photo size, so I'll oppose in a losing cause. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Fried beetles.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2018 at 01:12:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fried beetles in Asian cuisine (Entomophagy)
✓ Done Highlights softened. Agree they were a bit strong, but please @GerifalteDelSabana: also consider this shiny metallic aspect with glistening oil as part of the style (like hyperrealism) -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support :) sharp and crisp. Disgusting! ― Gerifalte Del Sabana 14:05, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A mass. Technically ok, but in my opinion the motif has no FP-potential. Sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 10:37, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • The idea to nominate this picture here came after I met it by chance on this website (2), while searching "Acrididae Laos" on Google :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Milseburg --Ermell (talk) 09:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Why not? Yummy ;-) Excellent work IMO -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Milseburg --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Milseburg. -- Karelj (talk) 10:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)