Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.

Formalidades

Nominación

Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas, entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.

Crear una nueva nominación

Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.

Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.

Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}

Para votar

Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:

{{Support}} ( Support),
{{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
{{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
{{Comment}} ( Comment),
{{Info}} ( Info),
{{Question}} ( Question).

Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.

Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.

Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.

Reglas

Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.

La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:

estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
que haya un mínimo de siete votos a favor
que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)
si a partir del quinto día, la candidatura tiene al menos diez votos a favor y ninguno en contra, automáticamente será destacada (regla del quinto día)

Recarga para nuevas nominaciones: purge this page's cache

Propuestas

Shortcut

COM:FPC/CL

Featured picture candidates

File:Faint aurora, a meteorite and some clouds over Tuntorp.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 May 2025 at 13:22:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
Info (No, not a scene from Wicked...) Despite the less colorful aurora, this is one of my own favorite aurora photos because of its spooky composition, incidentally shot during Halloween season. The aurora was rather faint, making it appear dark green against the black sky in a way that didn’t overwhelm the stars or the little settlement below, the wispy clouds adding to the atmosphere. And of course, the meteorite that made a perfect appearance for a couple of seconds.

The photo is made as a panorama, a trick I learned from another aurora photographer, and I thought I’d share with people here who might like to try similar shots. When you photograph the aurora, your camera is almost always tilted upward which results in leaning buildings and trees. Correcting that, you get those big pesky empty triangles in the lower corners. So you take your main photo and then add one on each side of it to fill in those triangles. That way you get a decent composition too. This is not something you need to think about if you shoot auroras in a landscape that doesn’t require perspective correction. For newbie aurora hunters, I always recommend starting at a beach or on a hill, where you can enjoy the show instead of thinking about the technicalities. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 13:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Cart (talk) 13:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose Only two active FP nominations per user are allowed. AVDLCZ (talk) 14:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC) ~~{{FPD}}~~[reply]

Comment Sorry AVDLCZ, you are quite new to FPC, so you don't know all the rules yet. This nom was made after the Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gold chain with gemstones and enamel, late 16th century, The Royal Armoury, Sweden.jpg was closed as a 5th day closing (please read the rules), and it's quite legal. ;-) I suggest that you do not make radical edits like this while you are still learning how the FPC works. You might also consider striking you vote since it was made on faulty grounds. --Cart (talk) 14:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I didn't notice the other nomination was just closed. AVDLCZ (talk) 14:39, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, we've all been eager newbies here and learned from our mistakes. :-) --Cart (talk) 15:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Meteorite makes this one special. Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed. Suitable for Halloween. Yann (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Callistocypraea aurantium 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 May 2025 at 09:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Cypraeidae
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Educative, high quality and very appealing color scheme. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radominian. --Seewolf (talk) 09:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 10:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radominian. --Terragio67 (talk) 12:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support An especially pretty one Cmao20 (talk) 13:06, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:People of Butte County – Tod Kimmelshue (2025)-104A8824.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 May 2025 at 01:53:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The technical quality is truly impressive - especially the sharpness and overall execution. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request At the same time, I find version 104A8815 from the same series even more compelling in terms of composition and expression. Though the eye is not quite as crisply defined, the overall presence feels stronger to me. Would you consider it as an alternative for the nomination? Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 09:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info (c/u/n) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met (73884).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 23:00:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing_and_Textiles
Info The final room of the Camp: Notes on Fashion exhibit at The Met. I took some shots of individual exhibits, but keep coming back to this one, with the top row of colorful looks mirrored in a case (and the top of the big pink hat it contains). Maybe an unusual composition, and I know there are some imperfections (a dark room packed with people), but I like it enough to give it a shot. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking image with great use of light and color - it captures the essence of the subject very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 09:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Cool image, the 'weak' is because the bright reflection bugs me a bit. IMO darkening the lower half somewhat would bring better balance to the photo. --Cart (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moroccan donkey and Populus nigra from Sidi Mimoun river.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 21:10:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi – uploaded by Mounir Neddi – nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice mood and a good representation, but the unfortunate top crop with abruptly cut off tree and ridge, ruins the image for me, sorry. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I agree with some of what UnpetitproleX says. The cut of tree top is unavoidable, but too many other elements could be used better in frame. I keep wanting to move the camera a bit to the right and up, to avoid the partial tree, include a little more of the stream's bank on the right side and clear the ridge of the hill. --Cart (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avutarda kori (Ardeotis kori), zona de conservación de Ngorongoro, Tanzania, 2024-05-27, DD 38.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 20:48:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Otididae (Small Bustards)
Info Kori bustard (Ardeotis kori), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania. Note: Surprisingly this candidate could be the first FP in the whole order Otidiformes. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution and great quality photo of an interesting bird in the wild Cmao20 (talk) 01:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, while this has good quality and is a strong QI, the light is unexceptional, the background drab and the top-down perspective doesn't work for me. It's valuable image for the species, but I don't think FP. --Cart (talk) 10:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hermit thrush (10787).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 18:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Turdidae_(Thrushes)
Info Hermit thrush (Catharus guttatus). Happy to finally get some good shots of this regular, but skittish migrant. Wasn't sure whether to nominate this one or File:Hermit thrush (10793).jpg. Same individual -- I like the pose and little flower in that shot, but the background is much cleaner in this one. We'll see what others think. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The feet are unfortunately not quite sharp but otherwise the picture is a FP for me.--Ermell (talk) 19:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Ermell. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:14, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marine after Eniwetok assault.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 13:21:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info created by Ray Platnick, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 13:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Important photo worth a feature. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 07:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Rhododendrites. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 10:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:EU @ G7 Summit 2024 - Family photo (06) (cropped).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 13:03:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Dario Pignatelli – uploaded by Zio27 – nominated by RodRabelo7 -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It should be renamed. Yann (talk) 13:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My instinct is that following the death of an important figure beloved by so many, we should perhaps wait a little bit before we decide what are truly the strongest images we have of him. I think it would be easy to promote this as we wish to commemorate his passing, but also I'm not convinced that the image quality is what I'd want it to be (blur, noise, plus distracting cropped people in the background). Cmao20 (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Je partage l'avis de Cmao20 ,la qualité monstrueusement faible de l'image et la pose très crispée me semble contre productif pour l'illustration d'un hommage posthume décent Mariondelouhans (talk) 14:52, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree with Cmao20 about the reasoning and Yann re the name, this is a clear equivalent of the Wikipedia:Too soon. And in my very personal opinion, rushing to FPC to score some point with a nom as soon as a famous person has died is also a bit tasteless. We are not in any hurry here. --Cart (talk) 13:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Don't see any problem with the timing of the nomination -- this just is not among the best photos I've seen of the person. PS: For anyone who hasn't seen it -- as it is now quite timely -- Conclave might be the best movie I've seen this year. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:40, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gleise der Steigerwaldbahn am Gundelsbach zwischen Gochsheim und Grettstadt 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2025 at 04:44:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail_tracks
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 04:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice shot, certain QI, but otherwise I cannot find anything special about it. Sorry --A.Savin 09:06, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I think I agree with A.Savin here. The central vanishing point is not very interesting, it's all quite a bland composition. I also think the picture doesn't seem to have many shadowed regions, everything is quite bright and I'm not sure this suits the subject. Image quality is of course as high as ever and I like the motif but it doesn't feel like a featured picture to me. Cmao20 (talk) 12:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paro Taktsang, Bhutan (edited).jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2025 at 21:32:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Bhutan
Info created by Nina R – originally uploaded by Юрий Д.К. – edited and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support edited to fix tilt and slightly sharpen from the original. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Your edit removed almost all camera metadata (ISO, f-number, shutter speed etc.), please fix. AVDLCZ (talk) 21:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm unsure how to do that, sorry UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:21, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here is your version of the photo, but merged with the full EXIF from the original. Use it if you like. (You can just upload it over the version in this nom. EXIF is always displayed from the latest version, the system can't display it from previous versions.) --Cart (talk) 23:55, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Cart, I’ve uploaded that version. Should be good now. :) UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition, solid quality, and the monastery is nicely highlighted by a patch of sunlight against the shady background. Hard to believe that we do not yet have a FP of this famous view, but indeed we have only very few good photo of Paro Taktsang (1, 2 are good QIs but this one is clearly better). – Aristeas (talk) 10:36, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 11:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really cool view! Nice light on the monastery, nice clouds in the background Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:14, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Handhabung, Doppeldecker Häfeli DH-5 (Militär) für Aerofotogrammetrie Aufnahmen, 000398822, edit.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2025 at 15:31:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Photographers
Info created by Federal Office of Topography, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 15:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:44, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 13:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Midland Pullman 43 059 and 43 046 Rannoch - Corrour.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2025 at 14:31:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail_vehicles#United_Kingdom
Info Kabelleger kindly uploaded some beautiful photos of Scottish trains on my request. I like this one because of the dramatic composition and the stark, beautiful, isolated landscape. created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stark indeed, hard to imagine that most of this used to be forests. --Cart (talk) 15:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support the bright blue of the train contrasts beautifully with the uninspiring surrounding landscape. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per UnpetitproleX. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:12, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ^(talk) 12:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per UnpetitproleX. – Aristeas (talk) 10:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:25, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arenal (Parapercis tetracantha), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-23, DD 44.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2025 at 13:38:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Pinguipedidae (Sandperch)
Info Portrait of a reticulated sandperch (Parapercis tetracantha), Anilao, Philippines. This sandprech is found in the Bay of Bengal to seas around Japan and Indonesia throughout the Indo-West Pacific region and can reach a total length of 26.0 centimetres (10.2 in). Note: we have no FPs of this species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality and composition Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating eye.--Ermell (talk) 21:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Ermell. – Aristeas (talk) 10:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:54, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gonyosoma oxycephalum Oslo.JPG

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2025 at 16:54:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Colubridae_(Colubrids)
Info created by Bjørn Christian Tørrissen – uploaded by Bjørn Christian Tørrissen – nominated by BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ -- BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ (talk) 16:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ (talk) 16:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ You should add Category, i hope Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Colubridae_(Colubrids) is correct. --Mile (talk) 10:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Děkuji, ano je to správně BRKOSLAV SEVERNÍ (talk) 15:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great green. --Seewolf (talk) 11:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot, good composition + detail. Focus/quality is not the best but it's okay for me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the colors and composition are good, but it's 15 years old photo taken with a bridge camera so there are a lot of chroma noise and artifacts. Unfortunately those are things that aren't easy to fix, so the quality doesn't measure up to a current FP for me. --Cart (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful photo. Technical quality is not the best but still acceptable. AVDLCZ (talk) 21:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:51, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Marvelous. --Mile (talk) 09:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - I tend to have higher standards for photos of captive animals, and agree with some of cart's criticisms, but the light/colors are just so good I wind up a little on this side of support. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:42, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per AVDLCZ and Rhododendrites. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Firebreathing.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2025 at 11:02:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created and uploaded by Holud.himu.kalo.rab – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kaim (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the scene is a bit cluttered, the upper and lower crops (perhaps even right) are not satisfactory and I'm also not sure of the angle. That said, I understand that this must not have been easy to photograph. But I'm not convinced for FP here. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wrocław - Jahrhunderthalle6.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2025 at 01:24:24

Info Top of the spine digitally modified to fit in the frame. Non-accurate proportions. Compare here or with the previous version in the history of the file page. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info You could mention the author: Taxiarchos228 --Mile (talk) 10:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist because of undeclared digital manipulations at the time of nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Yann (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist At the first glance one could think that only a tiny part of the spine is missing; but comparing several photos (e.g. 1, 2, 3 …) shows that a complete significant part of the spine is missing. If the editing would have been declared properly and if only a tiny part of the spine was missing, one could discuss this; but making us think that the spine is a whole lot smaller and not even declaring this questionable edit is indeed very problematic. Even more because the spine is not an arbitrary element in the photo, but a central part of it. – Aristeas (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. AVDLCZ (talk) 16:41, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Thi (talk) 07:56, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist modifications such as these can only be overlooked if duly revealed at the time of nom, and even then this may be too much of a modification to be an accurate depiction of the subject. --UnpetitproleX (Talk)09:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trains leaving Hůrka station 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 22:49:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro stations
Info Two trains simultaneously leaving the Hůrka metro station in Prague, created and nominated by me. This is my first FP submission, I appreciate any suggestions for improvements (this was shot in RAW, so changes can be made easily). -- AVDLCZ (talk) 22:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AVDLCZ (talk) 22:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support the technical quality looks OK to me, though I'm sure it would be better judged by the other, more experienced (and professional) photographers here. The image definitely has a wow factor for me. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:23, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect.--Ermell (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:58, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:42, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Successful capture with a Wow. (I took the liberty of adding the missing Short Description). -- Radomianin (talk) 08:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Whooosh! effect. --Cart (talk) 08:43, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome to FP, looks great to me Cmao20 (talk) 12:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:18, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 20:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 06:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. As a user of a similar camera I think it could be even a bit sharper; you might consider manually fine-tuning the focus when you take the next shot; or maybe all what is missing is a little bit more sharpening during raw image development. But it’s totally OK as it is, and congrats for the perfect framing and timing! – Aristeas (talk) 17:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing this out. I don't shoot that much RAW and didn't notice until today that the camera produces sharper JPEGs than RAWs, which have to be sharpened manually. I've uploaded a new version. AVDLCZ (talk) 18:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the improvement! Yes, the camera automatically sharpens all JPEG images (you can adjust the strength of the sharpening in the camera settings), but it does not sharpen the raw image date. This is correct because raw data often undergo extensive processing (e.g. correcting distortion and perspective, adjusting exposure etc.) and sharpening is best applied only at the end of this processing. Therefore we need to set the sharpening in the raw image processor. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral For me a bit too much floor in relation to the ceiling, otherwise good. --A.Savin 09:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did think about cropping out some of the floor, but ultimately decided against it. The composition feels more vertically balanced this way, and it allows anyone who prefers a cropped version to make one themselves. AVDLCZ (talk) 14:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Time should be biger. --Mile (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rolf Kranz (talk) 12:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akeleiblüte (Aquilegia vulgaris)-20220508-RM-112027.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 20:37:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Ranunculales#Family : Ranunculaceae
Info Columbine flower. Focus stack of 10 frames. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great quality, beautiful symmetrical composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Always happy to see your focus stacks Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Gallery fixed to the new gallery. This is what I 'pinged' you about earlier when the gallery was created. ;-) --Cart (talk) 21:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support with placement of the stem along the darker part of the background, the flower almost appears to be floating :) --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:41, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing smooth background and excellent focus stacking creation -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:55, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:45, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 08:44, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent and beautiful, thank you especially for this one as I love Aquilegia flowers. – Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:20, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I appreciate not "fixing" the downward-facing composition -- winds up with an unusual look. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schenna, Blick von der Verdinserstraße über die Kirche 3.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 18:31:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Italy
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 18:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely beautiful light and composition! Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a great capture with convincing light and exemplary composition, thank you very much for the nomination. (Only the few remnants of trees on the right edge of the picture could be removed by cropping to refine the composition.) -- Radomianin (talk) 19:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thx, followed your advice. --Plozessor (talk) 04:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cart (talk) 21:24, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:23, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:33, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Achacha fruits and seed.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 15:21:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info Ivar has done a few good focus stacks of appealing and unusual fruits. This is a small South American fruit with a tart flavour, there are no FPs of it and I think it is depicted attractively. In my opinion the equal of other focus stacks by Ivar I have nominated e.g. here. created by Iifar – uploaded by Iifar – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very detailed and sharp - the usual high Ivar quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I will confess that I hate these "autopsy-room-style" photos where food-related items are dissected, but I know they are good for the encyclopedia so I'll support them. --Cart (talk) 16:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I get where you’re coming from for sure. I like Ivar’s fruit because they always make me want to learn what this kind of fruit is like, and because the detail is so good. But as you say it’s more illustrative/encyclopedic rather than artistic/imaginative. Cmao20 (talk) 02:51, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 19:17, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Educational and clean background -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:46, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see Ivar’s fruit photos as worthy successors of baroque biology illustrations which always combined encyclopedic curiosity with artistic beauty (random example; note the cut fruit and the artificial combination of various stages of development of the insect in one image). Insofar I see no conflict here; for me they are excellent illustrations and excellent photographs. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:49, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bad Rappenau - Bonfeld - Evangelische Kirche - Kruzifix mit Kerzenbeleuchtung - Detail.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 15:20:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info The baroque crucifix in the protestant church of Bonfeld, Bad Rappenau, Germany, seen in candlelight. All by – Aristeas (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have always admired the courage of those who dare to nominate also ‘strange’ photos which break with some of our rules and habits. Well, it’s Good Friday and so I dare to nominate my favourite crucifix photo, knowing well that there are good reasons to call this a very bad photo. I wanted to photograph this crucifix in pure candlelight because I had the impression that this would make it look much more impressive and alive. But when I tried this (as usual) from a certain distance and with a straight perspective (similar to this photo), the sculpture looked stiff and dead. Only when I took the perspective of a person standing directly in front of the altar and focussed the lens only on the face did the sculpture come to life, so to speak. I know that perspective and crop are completely at odds with our usual conventions here; but somehow the leaning verticals and the narrow framing also seem to fit the motif of the suffering Christ. – Aristeas (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Great, creative way to depict this work of art Cmao20 (talk) 15:23, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find this image truly moving - precisely because it deliberately breaks with convention. The unusual perspective and warm light convey an intensity and closeness that does justice to the suffering and dignity of Christ in a very special way. As someone who believes, it's this kind of depiction that speaks more deeply than any "technically perfect" image ever could. It feels alive. And it speaks. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good light and angle, brings out the intent of the statue rather than just a lifeless object. Well done! --Cart (talk) 16:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rolf Kranz (talk) 18:46, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good sharpness for a handheld photo, but the harsh shadows and the poor light on the left part of the photo are not successful to me. It is an ordinary sculpture of a common subject present in all churches, basilica and cathedrals (another example). Due to the shallow depth of field, the focus draws the eye to the blood, painted in a not-so-subtle manner. Sorry, I know it's Easter weekend in Western countries, but it is better to leave the calendar aside when judging this kind of images potentially loaded with a strong symbolic connotation. (Hopefully the chocolate eggs will be no less tasty :-)) -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support While I wish for less shadows on the left, the image conveys strong emotions that a different light would not be able to convey. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:56, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:15, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Children playing in the rice mill (edited).jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2025 at 07:00:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Playing (having fun)
Info Children weave through towering rice-drying cones, transforming a rice mill in Brahmanbaria, Bangladesh, into their playground. This derivative has been edited by me to correct the underexposure of the original and improve the detail. I aimed to preserve the warm light atmosphere by applying tonal corrections, without making the image too cool. Original created and uploaded by Azimronnie – Derivative retouched and uploaded by -- Radomianin (talk) 07:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 09:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 14:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seeing what a dull gallery this would have been forced into, I realized we are sometimes far too serious here. We had completely forgotten to make room for Homo Ludens! That is now fixed and the gallery is corrected accordingly. Let's make that section grow, I think we all need a bit of that. --Cart (talk) 15:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is an excellent idea, Cart, thank you very much for creating the new gallery section. As the German poet Schiller has put it, people “are only fully human where they play.” – Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't agree more with Aristeas - thank you, Cart, for creating this new gallery section. As Homo Ludens, we discover who we are, process experiences, and unfold our personalities through play. It's good to see that spirit given a place within the gallery. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wouldn't be surprised to see this do well at POTY Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo was the deserved winner of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 and I always wanted to nominate it here, but hesitated because of some technical slips. Your edits have made the photo perfect. Thank you very much for your improvements and for the nomination! – Aristeas (talk) 15:25, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:08, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The crop is a bit random, but still... --Yann (talk) 16:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support has wow. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Artistic photo with a great composition and an interesting environment -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 04:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:48, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
SupportЮ. Данилевский (talk) 17:53, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 11:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 15:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Hundred Steeds.jpg (delist)

Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2025 at 09:25:52

Info I came across a new scan File:100 Horses by Giuseppe Castiglione.jpg and would like delist and replace advice. I can see that the new version has better transitions between the newly-obtained compiled scans at thumbnail size, with higher stated resolution and filesize but can't evaluate further on my phone. (Original nomination)
Unsure. As nominator, I will rely on those with proper monitors and eye for detail. I did message Yann, and I will let the uploader know. Sorry if I messed up the nomination, fix at will. -- Commander Keane (talk) 09:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Much better. Yann (talk) 13:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The new one is cropped (look at the mountains in the top left), appears to be oversaturated, and loses quite a lot of the fine detail. MER-C 16:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep per MER-C. The pixel-level detail in the proposed replacement is much worse, and the colours are too bright for my taste - the current FP may look dull in thumbnail but all the detail is there Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The new one is badly cropped and oversaturated. MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:52, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ertholmene aerial view of 3 islands asv2024-07.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2025 at 09:23:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Denmark
Info The Ertholmene archipelago near Bornholm. From left to right: Græsholm, Frederiksø, and Christiansø. All by me --A.Savin 09:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 09:23, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent view of these picturesque islands with their manifold coastline. The settlement and buildings remind me of a lovingly arranged toy train landscape. – Aristeas (talk) 06:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can't imagine it is possible to depict these islands any better in a single frame. Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:33, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support A clear, striking aerial view of Ertholmene with great contrast between the islands and the sea. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:41, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:15, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice compo and lighting but low res / too much denoising, bent horizon and cw tilt Poco a poco (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose At least solve horizon, and put some Light. --Mile (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gold chain with gemstones and enamel, late 16th century, The Royal Armoury, Sweden.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2025 at 10:42:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Jewellery
Info One of the most stunning gold chains in The Royal Armoury of Sweden. It's made of 4.5 kg solid gold with enamel, garnets and rock crystals. The photographer works with some of the most notable Swedish museum collections. The photo was recently promoted to FP on en-wiki. Created by Erik Lernestål – uploaded by LSHuploadBot – nominated by W.carter, -- Cart (talk) 10:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 10:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed, stunning! Yann (talk) 11:37, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive work! -- Radomianin (talk) 12:05, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not really fond of just plopping an object on a white background but I guess it makes the photo more useful Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand exactly what you mean, I usually don't go for that either. But in this case I think the incredible craftmanship that goes into making a chain like this plus the high quality photo, are the wow factors. --Cart (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Jewellery

File:Trompetnarcis-trumpet-narcissus 16-03-2025 (d.j.b.).jpg 02.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2025 at 04:24:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Amaryllidaceae
Info Flower bud in development of a Trumpet daffodil This green-yellow flower bud will develop into a bright yellow flower. Focus stack of 16 photos.
All by me -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:17, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good, sharp, nice colours, I do think I'd rather see a bit more of the stem though, just for the sake of composition even if there's nothing interesting going on there Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support. Note: I also put a picture of the same flower with more stem under this picture at (other versions). So it was a matter of making a choice.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The wider crop of the other picture results in a better composition, but the details shown in this picture are excellent. --Harlock81 (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To me the wider crop is perfect, but it's your image and your choice. Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the responses. I'll leave it like this for now. In this photo I found the distribution of the dew drops a bit better.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:11, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:09, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Amaryllidaceae

File:徐渭花卉图卷.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2025 at 11:45:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Plants - wide
Info uploaded by shizhao (talk) – nominated by Shizhao -- shizhao (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- shizhao (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very beautiful painting, but could you please give a bit more information about it in English for us who can't read it. From Google I get that it's a "Flower Picture Book", but it's harder to translate any part of the texts in the scroll. I've changed the gallery to the more appropriate 'Plants'. If it is promoted, we will simply create a 'Plants – wide' section for it. --Cart (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Never mind, I found a description on the source page and added it to the file page. Also fixed up the categories a bit. Please remember these steps for your next nomination. --Cart (talk) 16:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting work of art, good quality for its age, good reproduction. But I second Cart about more information. Yann (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If you have problems opening this large file, please use this link, it shows the scroll large enough to see the details without freezing your browser. --Cart (talk) 16:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:56, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:21, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Others#Plants - wide

File:Danny Sanderson.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2025 at 10:51:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Shai Franco – uploaded by שעה טובה – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition, you can see the music. --Seewolf (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:17, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:40, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:05, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Bottom crop is not good and top crop too tight, but the main issue is the focus. With f/9 I would expect the face not to be so unsharp. Poco a poco (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Entrance in Torp shopping mall, Uddevalla.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2025 at 22:21:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info People using the revolving doors of the entrance to Torp shopping mall, Uddevalla Municipality, Sweden. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Innovative nomination but heavy contrasts. I also find the cars of the parking and the "Kundvagnar" stand distracting, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The chaos of people going to and from their cars and using shopping carts (kundvagnar) is part of what shopping malls are up here in the north, this is not Singapore. --Cart (talk) 09:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure to understand why "Singapore", but there are too many dark parts, from my point of view, especially the top of the image completely black. Everything here is silhouetted, not just the people. And the image looks over-processed -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:08, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see anything remarkable which would lead to FP status. 50% of the picture is only black. Yann (talk) 11:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I’m still undecided, but it’s actually a clever feature that most people are just silhouettes without any recognizable features. Otherwise the people in the revolving doors would be very easily recognizable and it would be a severe infringement of their personality rights to publish a photo without their explicit consent (cf. the European GDPR). There are exceptions for press photographs, but Commons is not press photography, and therefore the legal status of the photo would be quite problematic. By hiding their faces in the shadows Cart has completely worked around this problem while still showing the revolving doors in full action. – Aristeas (talk) 15:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
However you decide (or not) I'm really glad that someone has recognized what I'm trying to do in many of my photos with people. I love street photography and to document everyday life, hopefully in a cool or artistic way. But to comply with the rules on Commons, you need to be creative in how you depict people, especially for FPC. Using silhouettes is a clear favorite for me. I don't see the problem with the percentage of black in the photo, we have other FPs using the same technique, examples. --Cart (talk) 16:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am rather hesitant. But it does fit. I had to look for a long time to see what was so appealing about the photo. At first it looks a bit restless, but the strong contrast is the real strength of the photo. --XRay 💬 18:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per XRay (and my own reasoning). After looking for a while at it I find the composition and the strong contrast quite impressive. The latter also even adds a touch of mystery to the image. – Aristeas (talk) 19:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per XRay en Aristeas. To me, on closer inspection, this is a sophisticated photo where the dark areas are important details.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It took me a while, but yeah, I see why this should be FP now. It's the fact that each of the silhouetted figures is framed within the 'openings' in the revolving doors. It's one of those moments that isn't easy to replicate, takes an artist to see (I don't think most photographers would have taken this shot at all), and it conveys quite a dynamic impression. Each of the figures is doing something a little bit different too - one has her back to us so we can't see, but of the others, one is carrying an ordinary plastic shopping bag, one has what looks like a gift bag, and one is looking at (I think her) phone. It's those little details that make this a piece of photographic art, not just a photo. Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I understand the artistic intent, but it just doesn't work for me. Top third is almost entirely black pixels, the cluttered background breaks any hope for a pleasing symmetry, there are a lot of unintended reflections and glare, and the image is overall not very sharp. Side note, in many countries and Sweden specifically, you don't need consent to take and publish photographs of people in public places. AVDLCZ (talk) 17:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I know about not needing consent here in Sweden, I'm just trying to treat other people in a respectful way. I have some personal experience with how you can be treated if other people think they are entitled to do things, just because it's not against the law. Besides, photos uploaded on Commons are allowed for commercial use, and you do need consent for that in Sweden. --Cart (talk) 18:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Yann, I see nothing here that makes my heart beat faster Poco a poco (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral While I see the intent and the innovative way to capture people, the picture as a whole doesn't appeal to me. The contast would have worked for me with a less cluttered background, but of course that is out of the photographer's control. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tadej Pogacar and his team in front of the peloton during Simacourbe climb of Tour de France 2024 stage 13.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2025 at 20:06:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Cycling
Info created by Shougissime – uploaded by Shougissime – nominated by Shougissime -- Shougissime (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shougissime (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool use of DoF. It's similar to this FP of chess where the DoF is used to single out one piece. Here we get the focus on the guy in the yellow leader shirt. It mirrors the focus a biker needs to have in such a race, and let everything distracting around him fade out, just like the focus in the photo. --Cart (talk) 22:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the only two runners in focus have their bicycles cropped out at the bottom. The level of blur of the foreground is distracting, in my view. And the background cluttered with vehicles make the composition busy -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree Poco a poco (talk) 12:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I think this is a good dynamic shot but I do take Basile's points. The out of focus cyclists in the foreground don't bother me but the cluttered background does Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sur En-Sent. Sculpture Negativ - Positive. Artwork by Peter Gredig. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2025 at 04:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info Sur En/Sent, municipality of Scuol, kanton Graubünden. Sculpture Negativ - Positive. Artwork by Peter Gredig. Switzerland is trying to connect art and nature in public outdoor spaces. This sculpture stands with many others along a mountain path near Sur En in the canton of Graubünden.
All by me -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting artwork Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a QI to me. Quality is fine, the subject is interesting but not extraordinary to overcompensate the simple composition and ordinary lighting/detail level, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 12:33, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like that the sculpture nicely stands out from the green background, but still fits ‘naturally’ into its surrounding, being made just from wood and stones. The soft light nicely emphasizes the relief on the sculpture. – Aristeas (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:ভরতপক্ষী (Alauda gulgula), লালগঞ্জ, দক্ষিণ চব্বিশ পরগনা, পশ্চিমবঙ্গ, DSC6316.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2025 at 22:10:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)
Info created by SVKMBFLY – uploaded by SVKMBFLY – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 22:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 22:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:59, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and composition Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Detail just ok, but the lighting is not good with the whole subject in shadow Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seewolf (talk) 22:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light is not perfect, but somehow it works for me, adding three-dimensionality to the bird and giving a nice mood to the photo. A bonus is that this photo has not been sharpened too much (which is, alas, quite common with wildlife photos), but looks very natural and realistic. – Aristeas (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support To me the bird stands out beautifully against the background.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gandhi Bhawan, Chandigarh.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2025 at 21:41:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
Info A modernist building designed by Pierre Jeanneret, the lesser-known cousin of Le Corbusier. The building sits on a raised plinth in a large P-shaped shallow pool, with an angular and curved three-part pinwheel roof, designed to evoke a floating lotus flower. The white colour of the building was chosen so to contrast with the red of the Fine Arts Museum designed by Corbusier, visible on the right. Picture taken after an intense thunderstorm during late monsoon, when the pool was filled with rainwater. Created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, restful composition. I really dislike this kind of architecture but this manages to make it look quite pleasant. Cmao20 (talk) 21:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is not particularly good and the image quality is not at FP level for me. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 11:03, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ermell: Thanks for the review. It was taken mid-day, I've adjusted the exposure and light. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:00, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the improvements. But I'm also missing the wow effect here. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 22:08, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The local brush is really too obvious in the new version, and gives a feeling of over-processing, with an odd white part behind the trees. Interesting mirror image but I would say the lighting conditions and heavy sky were not really so cooperative at the beginning -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment after @Ermell and Basile Morin: reviews I realised the structure looks a bit too warm/yellow for the time it was taken and the light conditions - turns out I had reduced the highlights way too excessively early on while editing the image, causing the unnatural colour. I went back to the original raw image to re-edit it to preserve the while colour of the structure. Pinging also @Cmao20: in case they wish to reconsider their support vote after this significant re-edit. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also adding that the pool is never filled artificially, so this view is only ever possible after heavy rain, which is why I nom'ed it. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification - still fine for me. Cmao20 (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Detail resolution etc. could be better, but I really like the composition – it was a clever move to put the main subject mostly in the left half of the image, this adds tension and interest to the image. The light is not thrilling, yes, but it nicely shows the depth of the building without adding any harsh shadows. And indeed the fact that the pond is filled and provides a nice reflection is a big plus. – Aristeas (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 16:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas for the improved version. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas en Radomianin for the improved version.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Formalidades

Nominación

Crear una nueva nominación

Para votar

Reglas

Propuestas

Featured picture candidates

Alternative

File:Wrocław - Jahrhunderthalle6.jpg (delist)

File:A Hundred Steeds.jpg (delist)

File:Gold chain with gemstones and enamel, late 16th century, The Royal Armoury, Sweden.jpg, featured

File:Trompetnarcis-trumpet-narcissus 16-03-2025 (d.j.b.).jpg 02.jpg, featured

File:徐渭 花卉图卷.jpg, featured

File:徐渭花卉图卷.jpg, featured