Commons:Candidatas a imaxes destacadas
Candidatas a imaxes destacadas noutras linguas:
Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/− |
Shortcut: COM:FPC Estas son as imaxes candidatas para convérterse en imaxes destacadas. Por favor teña en conta que isto non é o mesmo que ser a imaxe do día.
Para consultar o arquivo de propostas vexa: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
Hai unha lista das imaxes destacadas organizada por data.
- Véxase tamén: quality image candidates e Photography critiques
Procedemento formal[edit]
Proposta[edit]
Se vostede cre que está en presenza dunha imaxe destacada ou creou unha imaxe que cumpre os requisitos para considerarse valiosa, que ademais dispón dunha descrición e licenza apropiada, copie o nome da imaxe na caixa do formulario (incluído o prefixo Image:), a continuación do texto que contén a caixa:
Deseguido, debe incluír de xeito manual un enlace á paxina que creou na cima da lista de propostas.
Votación[edit]
Pode usar os seguintes modelos para expresar o seu apoio:
- {{Support}} (
Support) / {{Concordo}} (
Agree)
ou estoutros para expresar oposición:
- {{Oppose}} (
Oppose) / {{Discordo}} (
Oppose),
Tamén pode usar:
- {{Neutral}} (
Neutral) / {{Neutro}} (
Neutral)
- {{Comment}} (
Comment)
- {{Info}} (
Info)
Por favor intente incluír algunhas palabras que xustifiquen porque lle gusta ou disgusta a imaxe, en particular cando o voto sexa contrario. Lembre tamén asinar (~~~~).
Políticas e normas sobre candidatas a imaxes destacadas[edit]
Regras xerais[edit]
- After the end of the voting period the result will be determined on day 15 after nomination (shown in the time-table below). So the voting period is two weeks (plus the hours until the end of day 14). Votes added on day 15 or after are not counted.
- Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome
- Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome
- Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
- Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
- Nominators can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by simply writing "I withdraw my nomination".
- Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a depository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
- Pictures can be taken from the list if they have no support (not counting the nominator's) on day number 7 (day of nomination + 7).
Regras para as imaxes candidatas[edit]
A imaxe pode convérterse nunha imaxe destacada se cumpre as seguintes condicións:
- Dispor dunha licenza apropiada (por suposto)
- Contar como mínimo con 5 votos de apoio
- A relación entre apoio/oposición debe ser de 2/1 como mínimo (unha maioría de dous terzos)
- Non poden ser imaxes destacadas dúas versiións diferentes da mesma imaxe, só aquela co maior número de votos.
Para as instrucións sobre como proceder coas propostas antigas, vexa Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.
Featured picture delisting candidates[edit]
Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case.
This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. These require 2/3 majority (and a minimum of 5 votes) agreeing to delist from featured pictures. If there is not 2/3 agreeing to delist it, it stays as a featured picture. For these, vote {{Keep}} Keep (it deserves to be a featured picture) or {{Delist}}
Delist (it doesn't deserve to be a featured picture). Please provide a link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page). Otherwise the same rules as above apply. Please use this link to add a new removal candidate.
Guidelines for nominators[edit]
Below you can find some informal rules picture should match:
- Resolution - graphics located on Commons may be used not only for viewing them on a screen. They may be also used for printing or for viewing on very high resolution monitors. We can't predict what devices would be used in the future neither, so it is important that pictures being nominated have a resolution as high as possible. A resolution of at least 2 million pixel (e.g. 2000 x 1000) seems reasonable right now.
- Focus - every important object on the picture should be sharp.
- Foreground and background - foreground and background objects may be pretty distracting. You should check if something in front of the subject doesn't hide some important elements and if something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example if the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
- General quality - pictures being nominated should have good technical quality.
- Value - our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
- almost all sunsets are pretty, and most of such pictures are not different in the essence from others,
- nightshots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
- beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Not every rule has to be matched, e.g. a picture may have a low resolution, because higher resolution photos cannot be taken (subject may be dead), or the event is not going to occur again.
Guidelines for Evaluating Photographs[edit]
There are several criteria for evaluating images.
On the technical side, we have exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Digital cameras (or images) have a narrower latitude than film. Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The “Rule of Thirds” is a good guideline for composition and is an inheritance from the painting school. The idea is to divide the image with two imaginary horizontal and two vertical lines, thus dividing the image into thirds horizontally and vertically. Centering the subject is almost always considered a negative practice. Subjects of interest are placed in one of the “interest points”, where horizontal and vertical lines intersect (4 interest points are created). Horizons are never places in the middle, for they “cut” the image in half. They are placed either in the upper or lower horizontal line. Main idea here is NOT to center subject.
Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better over the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the “unnatural” nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and viceversa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, etc.
Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
Color is important. Over saturated colours are not good.
Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the “feel” to the touch….
Perspective refers to the “angle” accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
Symbolic meaning or relevance…. Well, this is where opinion wars start…. A bad picture of a very difficult subject is a better picture than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photograher and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image “speaks” to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, hapiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations….
Above all, Be polite[edit]
Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone elses. Choose your words with care.
Happy judging… and remember.... all rules can be broken
Page refresh: purge this page's cache
To add your nomination to the list: Open this & add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}
Featured Picture Candidates[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:Retrato de caballero - Paulus Moreelse-restored.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2023 at 18:49:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People
Info created by Paulus Moreelse - uploaded by Isha - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 18:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 18:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 19:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose The details aren't exceptionally clear, and this is just not that large a reproduction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Saint Simon the Zealot - Arcade of Basilica of Aparecida - Aparecida 2014 (2).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2023 at 13:41:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info Statue of Saint Simon the Zealot in the arcade of the Basilica of Our Lady of Aparecida. Created and uploaded by Jbribeiro1 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 13:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Better when taken from further away with a bigger lens? Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Whatever, both options can take good photos. ★ 16:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- looking up from below is not a great PoV when a better one is available. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Whatever, both options can take good photos. ★ 16:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Écomusée d’Alsace 11.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2023 at 09:39:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#France
Info A medieval scene in the 21st century; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment I never knew they had watches, identity lanyards, and factory-produced tiles in those days! Many more anachronisms (shoes, the tap... etc.). Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Info I meant that in a humorous way, not that this really portrays the Middle Ages accurately. The actors didn't want to play the Middle Ages either. It is my personal impression that this scene is reminiscent of earlier times. Please read the file description, there is no mention of the Middle Ages or anything similar, just the description of what is pictured. If the above comment bothers you, I have no problem removing it. --Llez (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- No problem Llez, I just have a thing about anachronisms in books, reenactments, movies etc - like dirndl dresses in the Middle Ages! So I cannot see this being an FP, I'm afraid. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support It gives the vibe of an oilpainting, early impressionism, I really like it. --Kritzolina (talk) 20:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support. I was going to comment about how there was nothing misleading in the file description, but then I saw Kritzolina's really astute comment, which I agree with. Charles, do you think the anachronisms need to be pointed out to the viewer in the file description? I doubt it, because it's called Écomusée, not Musée du Moyen Âge. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 20:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Cuolm Sura 1585m. 21-09-2022. (d.j.b) 04.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2023 at 04:40:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Graubünden
Info Cuolm Sura. View (from Surcuolm) on the clouds above the mountains on the south side of the valley. Nice late summer atmosphere.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Pallastunturi and Hanhijärvi in Muonio, Lapland, Finland, 2023 September.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2023 at 23:05:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Finland
Info created & uploaded by User:Ximonic - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Another beautiful Nordic lake photo, with forest and hills in the background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 07:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 16:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Ancient Temple, Naranag, Jammu and Kahsmir, India.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2023 at 19:17:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info created and uploaded by Basavaraj K. Korkar - nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 07:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 16:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Nice photo, but there's a large dust spot that doesn't contrast much from the blue sky but is visible between two clouds about half way from the center of the picture from to the left margin. It's visible even as a thumbnail if you know where to look for it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Also, the misspelling of Kashmir should be corrected after the nomination is over. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Iglesia del Gesù Nuovo, Nápoles, Italia, 2023-03-25, DD 05-07 HDR.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2023 at 18:25:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Italy
Info Crossing of the church of Gesù Nuovo, Naples, Italy. Originally a palce built in 1470 it was bought by the Jesuits that constructed a church (1584–1601) under architect Giuseppe Valeriano. The construction was also helped by local support including that of Roberta Carafa, Countess of Maddaloni. When the Jesuits were expelled from Naples in 1767, the church passed to the Franciscan order. The Jesuits returned in 1821, only to be expelled again in 1848. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 18:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 18:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Perspective problem, the upper right column is stretching towards the upper right corner generating a distortion in the image (note added) --Wilfredor (talk) 19:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wilfredor: this is not an obvious perspective correction, since only a quarter or the image seems to be affected. I can surely fix it, that's not a problem, but I wonder if it is correct to expect perfect symmetry from such an old building with cracks everywhere. Poco a poco (talk) 12:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Beautiful to me. Strange history: do you know why the Jesuits were expelled from Naples twice? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, you can read about it here Poco a poco (talk) 12:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- "Site not found". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 07:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File: Anjos no céu (cropped).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2023 at 17:22:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Brazil
Info Interior of the Metropolitan Cathedral of Brasília. It was designed by Brazilian architect Oscar Niemeyer and engineered by Brazilian structural engineer Joaquim Cardozo, and was completed and dedicated on May 31, 1970. The cathedral is a hyperboloid structure constructed from 16 concrete columns, weighing 90 tons each. Created and uploaded by Arturdiasr - edited by PetarM - cropped and nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Yes, we have some technical questions but it's a picturesque and unique church (wow factor). -- ★ 17:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment the CA should be fixed --Virtual-Pano (talk) 23:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Done --Wilfredor (talk) 20:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! @Virtual-Pano: CA fixed. ★ 20:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Grand Canyon South Rim at Sunset.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2023 at 11:25:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Arizona
Info created by mgimelfarb - uploaded by mgimelfarb - nominated by Mgimelfarb (talk) 11:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Mgimelfarb (talk) 11:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 18:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Lovely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Monument Valley Arizona Panoramic.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2023 at 11:15:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Arizona
Info created by mgimelfarb - uploaded by mgimelfarb - nominated by Mgimelfarb (talk) 11:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Mgimelfarb (talk) 11:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment This looks better than the very similar current FP, but we shouldn't have both as FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Is this a significant problem? There are, for instance, multiple similar featured pictures of Horseshoe Bend and Antelope canyon
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Arizona Mgimelfarb (talk) 22:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, there far too many FPs of of Horseshoe Bend and Antelope canyon, but voters at FP have a great reluctance to delist images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ~ ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 18:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Motif is excellent, but sharpness is not. There is also a stitching error, see note. --Milseburg (talk) 18:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comments. I reduced the default noise reduction in Camera Raw and stitched it again. Mgimelfarb (talk) 22:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Looks great to me! I don't think the other FP is similar enough to require a delist-and-replace, but Charles, feel free to nominate it for delisting. It's not very big and noisy, and technology has moved on since 2004. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support But could you remove the unsharp bird? --Llez (talk) 09:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Петергоф, Знаменка, левый фонтан перед усадьбой сверху.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2023 at 08:09:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Russia
Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 08:09, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 08:09, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I don't understand how this could be interesting. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Per Sharp. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Weak oppose Thank you for your contribution. It's weird, but not that interesting. Извините. - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 18:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment It's a good photo, and I understand why you nominated it. I suspect it would have gotten more support here if grain, rather than patchy grass, was growing except in the former fountain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Short-horned grasshoppers (Rhytidochrota risaraldae) mating.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2023 at 16:54:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Acrididae (Short-horned grasshoppers and locusts)
Info A grasshopper endemic to the Colombian Andes. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:03, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 20777 05:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 06:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:19, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Quai du Louvre 1867, by Claude Monet.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2023 at 15:54:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info Quai du Louvre, Paris, France in 1867. Painted by
Claude Monet - uploaded by Andrew J.Kurbiko - nominated by ABAL1412 - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 15:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 15:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment
Bottom of the painting has been cropped.Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Also the left side --Wilfredor (talk) 19:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Done ~ ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 06:54, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose We've been featuring absolutely humongous scans of paintings. This is not a super-high-res reproduction, so it just can't compete with those. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per Ikan. Красный wanna talk? 13:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Red-headed barbet (Eubucco bourcierii occidentalis) female Las Tangaras.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2023 at 15:03:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Capitonidae (New World Barbets)
Info Barbets are related to toucans and woodpeckers. It is the male that gives the bird its name. 15 colourful species but no FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:03, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 15:48, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Image:Monumento funebre Guasco di Bisio Spinola.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2023 at 00:15:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries
Info created by Brigante mandrogno - uploaded by Brigante mandrogno - nominated by Brigante mandrogno -- Brigante mandrogno (talk) 00:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Brigante mandrogno (talk) 00:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Nice compositional idea, but serious posterization and vignetting. Could you redevelop this from the RAW file? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Teide Caldera Rim - 2.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2023 at 19:32:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
Info created by Imehling - uploaded by Imehling - nominated by Imehling -- imehling (talk) 19:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- imehling (talk) 19:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 14:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Neutral An impressive view, but in terms of composition I think the red rocks in the bottom left corner and the clouds in the top right corner are a bit distracting. Both elements are a bit awkwardly sized: not small enough to be ignored, but not large enough to cover enough of the frame to not be on the fringes. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:38, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment I think there is a tilt to the right (See the row of clouds on the right side and also the coastline of Gran Canaria) --Llez (talk) 09:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Quite good, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Palácio Quitandinha, Petropolis.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2023 at 16:09:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Brazil
Info all by -- Wilfredor (talk) 16:09, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Nice light. ★ 16:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 14:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Myosotis scorpioides - Niitvälja bog.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2023 at 09:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Boraginaceae
Info all by Ivar (talk) 09:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Ivar's top quality as always. ★ 11:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Question The composition is great, but the water droplets don't seem as sharp as they could be on the petals - like on this one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Really pretty specimen enhanced with nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:37, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 14:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 22:15, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 38939 05:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Oriental garden lizard (Calotes versicolor) in a mango tree in Laos.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2023 at 01:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 11:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 14:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 34531 05:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 09:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Wild goat lying on a tree stump under colorful clouds at sunrise in Don Kek Si Phan Don Laos.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2023 at 01:50:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Question Is the sky taken as-is or was there some processing involved? --SHB2000 (talk) 07:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sure the sky was as is. The clouds were incredible. With this sky in the morning, I quickly took my boat to find a good spot to capture it. Then it was completely unexpected that I met these wild goats on this island. But the sun is in front. You can see the subtle lighted side on the animal. Thus the picture was voluntarily underexposed to limit the highlights. In post process the shadows have been gently lifted to reveal more detail of the goat. The colors were as shown. Tripod was used. exposure time 1/15s -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:45, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Lovely!
★ 11:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 11:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I like the composition, but don't like the lack of any detail on the goat. Bottom left of the image is strange but not so important. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 14:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 14:05, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Overall the image looks way to manipulated for me. I don't like the HDR-ish effect, it is way too saturated. The goat has a weird halo around the ears. Not every photo has to or can be 'improved' with photoshop. The focus seems to be on the tree behind the goat and not on the goat. --Ephramac (talk) 19:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Well, the goat's ears are hairy and they are lit from the back, so the halo this produces is perfectly natural. I wouldn't call that "weird". It happens to all hairy creatures when photographed in contre-jour light. I would however suggest that the chosen gallery would be 'Places/Other' for this photo, since the goat isn't really that well represented. It's more like a very nice combo photo where your first intention was to capture the sky and not the goat as a species.--Cart (talk) 21:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Info Gallery changed from Bovidae (Bovids) to Places/Other, per Cart. Thanks for the suggestion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 26342 05:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose The sky was impressive for sure but it's difficult to translate this kind of feeling with a camera. In this case, the whole picture isn't appealing for me and the light on the goat is way too subtle to emphasize it. --Selbymay (talk) 11:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
File:34. Ulica - TNT Shows - Moving Poles - 20210904 1316 1954.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 20:06:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Events
Info TNT Shows in the show "Moving Poles" at the festival of street theatres in Krakow. All be me -- Jakubhal 20:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 20:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 20:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Impressive snapshot in any respect. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Cool! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 22:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 14:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 22:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin Terragio67 (talk) 04:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 22378 05:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support I'd remove the unsharp bird --Llez (talk) 09:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support maar per Llez --Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Sophienschule, Uhr mit Verzierungen 20230915 HOF09127 RAW-Export.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 17:17:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info Gable with clock of a neo-renaissance school in Hof, Germany, created by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 20:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Perfectly good QI, but nothing amazing to me. I'd prefer a photo of the whole school, though in better light than File:Sophienschule 20211020 HOF07229 RAW-Export 20220510002781CORR01 Kopie.jpg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Okay, thank you for your comment, this helps me to classify :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
File: Parque Nacional da Serra Geral - Raphael Sombrio (01).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 15:59:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info Canyon at Serra Geral National Park, Santa Catarina, Brazil. The park is in the Atlantic Forest biome and covers 17,302 hectares (42,750 acres). Created and uploaded by Raphael Sombrio - nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 15:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Really beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Wow! What a panorama! Yann (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 20:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 20:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Nice sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 01:49, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 22:18, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:16, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 22084 05:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Zwickau Bockwa - Matthäuskirche (aka).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 14:29:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info The exterior of the Matthäuskirche church in Zwickau, Bockwa, Saxony, Germany. Created and uploaded by Aka - nominated by ABAL1412 -- ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 14:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 14:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment It is a shame the photographer couldn't climb up onto the bank to get all the church in the frame. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- As a result of coal mining, the church sank by 9.80 m -- aka 15:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Nice photo and interesting story. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- a joke Ikan Kekek... Here is another photo Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oh well. Still a nice photo, though. aka, you can't assume people around the world will know if you're joking about stuff like this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's no joke, please see w:de:Matthäuskirche (Bockwa). I took this photo from across the river. -- aka 19:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Thanks, so not a joke (so why use small text?); an interesting point but not relevant to FPC. We cannot see the base of the church in this shot like you can from the other viewpoint. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oh well. Still a nice photo, though. aka, you can't assume people around the world will know if you're joking about stuff like this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - Je-str (talk) 20:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Fountain at Plaza de Sta Maria in Vitoria-Gasteiz (1).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 13:07:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 14:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 11:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 22:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 34901 05:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Nice light.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Man talking on the phone in Montréal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport 006.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2023 at 04:30:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Standing_people
Info After two seemingly endless days journeying from Brazil to Canada, with a 15-hour layover in Panama that felt as if it had stolen years from my life, I found myself trapped in the cold, gray disembarkation area of Montreal Airport (YUL). Looming before me was an agonizing 11-hour wait for my bus to Montreal, only to then board another bound for Quebec City. From there, a final desperate trip on the sterile public transit system might, with any luck, deliver me home by the fading light of 6pm. Reflecting upon that eternal limbo of 11 hours at YUL, an overwhelming fatigue consumed me, a blend of weariness that went beyond the physical and a spiraling despair over the cursed bus delay. I felt so hollow, so extinguished, that I didn't even possess the strength to lift my camera and capture a memory. Yet, amidst the fog of my desolation, a scene broke through my ennui. A man, lost on a Bell Canada payphone, his legs crossed as though trying to hold the weight of the world, and arms dancing in gestures of disbelief as he gazed outward, surrounded by a sea of luggage that seemed to mirror the burdens of the soul. In that moment, in his solitary figure, I saw my own inner tempest mirrored — every facet of my hopelessness perfectly echoed in his demeanor. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 04:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 07:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 09:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support for the poetry. ;o) Yann (talk) 14:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Very good retro slice-of-life photography, even if I hadn't read the story. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 23852 05:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Claustro de San Gregorio Armeno, Nápoles, Italia, 2023-03-25, DD 97.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2023 at 19:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info Garden and fontana di Gesù e la Samarintana, cloister of San Gregorio Armeno, Naples, Italy. The monumental cloister is located in the religious complex of the same name. The precise date of the foundation of the structure is somewhat unknown, however some written sources have suggested that the cloister already existed in a period prior to the 11th century. In fact, in a political document, the then small church of San Gregorio Armeno is mentioned, flanked by three other small churches. All together, located a short distance from each other, they were then united to form a single complex dedicated to San Gregorio Armeno. The cloister is characterized by the baroque fountain of disputed attribution shown here. The fountain is flanked by two statues depicting Christ and the Samaritan woman, sculptural works by Matteo Bottiglieri and is the central element of four flowerbeds on which there are orange trees. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Nice photo. There's what looks like a very subtle dust spot just diagonally up to the right of the right edge of the highest part of the roof. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment supporting Ikan's remark and why not removing the tip of a leaf? very upper rim far right while you are touching the frame? --Virtual-Pano (talk) 22:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, Virtual-Pano:
Done, thanks for your feedback Poco a poco (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, Virtual-Pano:
Comment The leaked water is kinda distracting. - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 06:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination This is going nowhere, thank you anyhow, Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Alberto Olmedo como Piluso en Canal 7-restored.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2023 at 19:04:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by Canal 7, Argentina - uploaded by Galio - restored / nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 19:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 19:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Ezarate, I think your restoration work is not complete. Work on eliminating the vertical lines visible on both actors' pants and some other stray straight and curved lines throughout the picture frame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- More scratches and strange lines removed Ezarateesteban 23:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Still incomplete. Look at the left side of the picture frame and the dark suit. Also, the edges are messy on the left and right. I'll have to oppose if the restoration isn't superb. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- More scratches and strange lines removed Ezarateesteban 23:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Superficial restoration -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Basile Morin see now, please Ezarateesteban 23:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- There are still obvious lines. I'll
Oppose at this point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Agree. And also, low resolution (only 2,048 × 1,432 pixels) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- There are still obvious lines. I'll
- Basile Morin see now, please Ezarateesteban 23:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- And juste a recomendation, keep the original in commons without changes too --Wilfredor (talk) 11:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per above - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 14:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Hintersee-Hochkalter.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2023 at 15:02:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info Lonely tree on an island-rock in the Hintersee with Hochkalter-Mountains, Berchtesgaden Alps, Bavaria, Germany. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 15:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Well-made scenic and fine for QI but for FP, there must be more wow. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Wow is here. ★ 17:20, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. I'd encourage anyone who believes they could shoot a better composition of this motif to go and try; I'd like to see the results, but this deserves a star. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- It is a high quality composition, but to my eyes, the foreground tree is too close and I wonder if 4x2 crop would be better? It seems slightly constrained at the sides (though there may be buildings there). Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Even if the crop above the tree is a little tight. --Ermell (talk) 07:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support I agree with Ermell --Harlock81 (talk) 15:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with GRDN711, I'm missing something here, detail, light, compo are not extraordinary IMHO, sorry Milseburg, Poco a poco (talk) 11:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 23781 05:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Fall colors are a bit too washed out, and the tree being taller than the mountains does not make for a good composition IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:05, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Lençóis Maranhenses 2018.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2023 at 10:10:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info Fresh water collecting in the valleys between sand dunes in the Lençóis Maranhenses National Park in Brazil. A layer of rock beneath the sand prevents the rain water from dissipating during the rainy season, resulting in a broad expanse of lagoons. Created and uploaded by Julius Dadalti - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 10:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support I’m a bit unsure about the detail on the sand dunes (some parts look as if they were overexposed = clipped and in processing the colour was recovered, but not the detail), but overall it’s a great view. --Aristeas (talk) 12:52, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 13:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support works well with the clouds. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Technically not amazing but a fascinating view with great colours. BigDom (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Really interesting but should be de-noised. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Per BigDom. Questionable settings and technical result, but nice place - Benh (talk) 09:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 01:53, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 32376 05:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Inside of a hot air balloon.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2023 at 09:00:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Aerostats
Info created and uploaded by Hu Nhu, nominated by Yann
Support Beautiful colors, nice composition. Another Photo challenge finalist. -- Yann (talk) 09:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Strong support Certainly a POTY finalist. ★ 11:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 13:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 16:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 07:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Eye-catching geometrical patterns, nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 39703 05:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 09:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Montefrío.JPG[edit]
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2023 at 20:05:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Spain
Info created and uploaded by Parlamento~commonswiki - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 20:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Good picture, but not very large - it's from 2009, after all! - and the left crop bugs me. I think it's still a QI if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- 3 888 × 2 592 pixels? Not very large? ★ 23:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- No, not for an FPC-nominated photo of an entire village. Compare similar nominations of views of Italian villages down the page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Weak oppose It's not very sharp when I zoom in. But this is a nice view. - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 03:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per Ikan – would still be a good QI, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination ★ 10:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Female spruce grouse.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2023 at 14:01:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info: Spruce grouse hen; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 15:10, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support The contrast is not as great as I wanted at smaller sizes, but the photo looks amazing at full size, and what a beautiful bird! (Do something about the red-linked category, though.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Nice bird, but the rock behind the head distracts. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 11:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 37227 05:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 23:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Panteón de la Duquesa de Sevillano, Guadalajara, España, 2023-01-02, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2023 at 05:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info Pantheon of the Duchess of Sevillano, Guadalajara, Spain. María Diega Desmaissières y Sevillano (1852–1916), Countess of Vega del Pozo, commissioned the project for the construction of a mausoleum for herself to Ricardo Velázquez Bosco. The construction of funerary architecture built in eclectic style began in 1887 and ended in 1916, the year in which the Countess died. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 05:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 05:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 17:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Showing the mausoleum trough the trees of the allée is an excellent choice. --Aristeas (talk) 12:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting composition but not sure it works for me, I find all the trees a little distracting from the main subject unfortunately. Dull light tips it over the edge, sorry Poco. BigDom (talk) 14:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment I will happily support once the 2 processing artefacts? above and to the upper left of the foremeost left tree are removed --Virtual-Pano (talk) 22:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Virtual-Pano: Thanks for the hint but I cannot see any artifacts in that area, could you please add a note? --Poco a poco (talk) 05:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- *
Comment I have added three boxes with remarks in the affected areas yesterday and included the coordinates for the center of the artefacts just now --Virtual-Pano (talk) 16:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Virtual-Pano: My problem was not to figure out the location but rather that I couldn't see anything there. Anyhow, I cloned those areas and uploaded a new version, maybe I fixed the problem with covered eyes :) Poco a poco (
talk) 16:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support The composition takes the viewer along the path towards the mausoleum, which works well for me --Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 11:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 30755 05:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Rufous-backed Dwarf-Kingfisher 0A2A6720.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2023 at 18:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Alcedinidae_(Kingfishers)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Superb colors, sharp, good composition. Yann (talk) 18:48, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Wow, what a color contrast. JJ's photos blow me away every time. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 23:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support, and cute birb. RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:45, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment The composition is great as are the colours, but there is little definition in the feathers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per Charles, sorry. I think our standard for sharp feathers on kingfishers is higher than this, though I've obviously been totally outvoted, so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Contrary to Ikan and Charles, I believe the definition of the feathers is suitable for FP, however it is not the best among the FPs for kingfishers. So I don't see why I should oppose this nomination. 20 upper 09:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Note that we already have 30 FPs of kingfishers. I therefore think we should be very selective about the quality of additional FPs of kingfishers. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Neutral Per concerns above. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support FP IMHO. ★ 11:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 29257 05:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Agapornis roseicollis bird.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2023 at 10:26:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True Parrots)
Info all by MSN12102001 (talk) 10:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- MSN12102001 (talk) 10:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Poor quality. I made what I had hoped was a helpful post at Valued Images. It was ignored. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like the head being in darkness. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:48, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Weak support Per Ikan Kekek. The bird's head should be brighter. But since it's cute, I still give you a weak support. - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 04:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Caged bird. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Low quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Blå Porten (2023).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2023 at 21:19:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info Blå Porten (Blue Door, 1849) in Stockholm, framing the building Sirishov in the background. Created by ThibautRe - uploaded by ThibautRe - nominated by ThibautRe -- ThibautRe (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- ThibautRe (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 14:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support A beautiful portal and a good framing effect. --Aristeas (talk) 12:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 13:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose IMHO - good quality but not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 36538 05:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per GRDN711. The view through the gate is nice, as is the overall scene, but I don't find the overall composition really outstanding, rather than good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per GRDN711. -- Karelj (talk) 09:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 09.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2023 at 05:25:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Just not a compelling image for a captive animal - I really want to look into the eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:37, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Support I want to give this photo a little love. The human-like baby head and excellent composition make this an FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Support ★ 00:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support So cute!! Wow!! 20 upper 09:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 12:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose per Charles, sorry. BigDom (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Also per Charles, Poco a poco (talk) 19:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Princess 🍵 Rosalina 30420 05:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Support Why should you look the baby in the eye? It's an endearing image to me. --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Delisting candidates[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:Retrato de caballero - Paulus Moreelse-restored.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2023 at 18:49:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.