Commons:Candidatas a imaxes destacadas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Candidatas a imaxes destacadas noutras linguas:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | հայերեն | +/−

Shortcut: COM:FPC Estas son as imaxes candidatas para convérterse en imaxes destacadas. Por favor teña en conta que isto non é o mesmo que ser a imaxe do día.

Para consultar o arquivo de propostas vexa: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

Hai unha lista das imaxes destacadas organizada por data.

Contents

Procedemento formal[edit]

Proposta[edit]

Se vostede cre que está en presenza dunha imaxe destacada ou creou unha imaxe que cumpre os requisitos para considerarse valiosa, que ademais dispón dunha descrición e licenza apropiada, copie o nome da imaxe na caixa do formulario (incluído o prefixo Image:), a continuación do texto que contén a caixa:


Deseguido, debe incluír de xeito manual un enlace á paxina que creou na cima da lista de propostas.

Votación[edit]

Pode usar os seguintes modelos para expresar o seu apoio:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support) / {{Concordo}} (Symbol keep vote.svg Agree)

ou estoutros para expresar oposición:

  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose) / {{Discordo}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),

Tamén pode usar:

  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral) / {{Neutro}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral)
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment)
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info)

Por favor intente incluír algunhas palabras que xustifiquen porque lle gusta ou disgusta a imaxe, en particular cando o voto sexa contrario. Lembre tamén asinar (~~~~).

Políticas e normas sobre candidatas a imaxes destacadas[edit]

Regras xerais[edit]

  1. After the end of the voting period the result will be determined on day 15 after nomination (shown in the time-table below). So the voting period is two weeks (plus the hours until the end of day 14). Votes added on day 15 or after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome
  4. Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by simply writing "I withdraw my nomination".
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a depository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Pictures can be taken from the list if they have no support (not counting the nominator's) on day number 7 (day of nomination + 7).

Regras para as imaxes candidatas[edit]

A imaxe pode convérterse nunha imaxe destacada se cumpre as seguintes condicións:

  1. Dispor dunha licenza apropiada (por suposto)
  2. Contar como mínimo con 5 votos de apoio
  3. A relación entre apoio/oposición debe ser de 2/1 como mínimo (unha maioría de dous terzos)
  4. Non poden ser imaxes destacadas dúas versiións diferentes da mesma imaxe, só aquela co maior número de votos.

Para as instrucións sobre como proceder coas propostas antigas, vexa Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.

Featured picture delisting candidates[edit]

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. These require 2/3 majority (and a minimum of 5 votes) agreeing to delist from featured pictures. If there is not 2/3 agreeing to delist it, it stays as a featured picture. For these, vote {{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (it deserves to be a featured picture) or {{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist (it doesn't deserve to be a featured picture). Please provide a link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page). Otherwise the same rules as above apply. Please use this link to add a new removal candidate.

Guidelines for nominators[edit]

Below you can find some informal rules picture should match:

  • Resolution - graphics located on Commons may be used not only for viewing them on a screen. They may be also used for printing or for viewing on very high resolution monitors. We can't predict what devices would be used in the future neither, so it is important that pictures being nominated have a resolution as high as possible. A resolution of at least 2 million pixel (e.g. 2000 x 1000) seems reasonable right now.
  • Focus - every important object on the picture should be sharp.
  • Foreground and background - foreground and background objects may be pretty distracting. You should check if something in front of the subject doesn't hide some important elements and if something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example if the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • General quality - pictures being nominated should have good technical quality.
  • Value - our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are pretty, and most of such pictures are not different in the essence from others,
    • nightshots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.

Not every rule has to be matched, e.g. a picture may have a low resolution, because higher resolution photos cannot be taken (subject may be dead), or the event is not going to occur again.

Guidelines for Evaluating Photographs[edit]

There are several criteria for evaluating images.

On the technical side, we have exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Digital cameras (or images) have a narrower latitude than film. Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.

Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The “Rule of Thirds” is a good guideline for composition and is an inheritance from the painting school. The idea is to divide the image with two imaginary horizontal and two vertical lines, thus dividing the image into thirds horizontally and vertically. Centering the subject is almost always considered a negative practice. Subjects of interest are placed in one of the “interest points”, where horizontal and vertical lines intersect (4 interest points are created). Horizons are never places in the middle, for they “cut” the image in half. They are placed either in the upper or lower horizontal line. Main idea here is NOT to center subject.

Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better over the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the “unnatural” nature of the pose would be a good photograph.

Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and viceversa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, etc.

Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.

Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.

Color is important. Over saturated colours are not good.

Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the “feel” to the touch….

Perspective refers to the “angle” accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.

Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.

Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.

Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.

Symbolic meaning or relevance…. Well, this is where opinion wars start…. A bad picture of a very difficult subject is a better picture than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.

Images can be culturally biased by the photograher and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image “speaks” to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, hapiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations….

Above all, Be polite[edit]

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone elses. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember.... all rules can be broken

Page refresh: purge this page's cache


To add your nomination to the list: Open this & add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}

Featured Picture Candidates[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:2017.06.03.-14-Anglerteiche-Rimbach--Spitzenfleck-Maennchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 12:01:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scarce chaser - Libellula fulva, male.

File:Wells Cathedral Nave Photograph.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 06:58:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wells Cathedral Nave

MAV Canidae[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 06:33:09 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Bases on previous discussion, I gather all Canidae skeletons displayed at MAV - edited by Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton - uploaded by Joalpe and Sturm - nominated by -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 06:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 06:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - There are certainly differences in the way these skeletons are photographed. For example, some are yellower or darker than others. But overall, this is a notable achievement, even if a little eerie. Also, it's fitting but in a way odd that one of the skeletons is of a mutt, because there are so many different mixtures possible in a mutt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't see how this is different to Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/MAV I. Canidae is a huge family of creatures. As others have noted, I wouldn't expect a collection of Lez's shells to be nominated as a set, or a collection of Jee's butterflies to be nominated as a set. The final one (Saint Bernard dog) is poor quality. As the FP page says: "Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats". Here we have a few species/breeds of canids: there are 34 species, and hundreds of breeds of dogs. The fact that this may be the entire collection currently at MAV isn't IMO enough to make this a set, it just tells me that their collection is rather limited. -- Colin (talk) 08:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Certainly good VI candidates, but this one is relatively small and the head is unsharp, this one has blown highlights. I don't think each of them would be promoted if they were nominated separately, thus I don't see why they should be as a set -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Haft-sin, Nowruz, Still-life-3205068.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2019 at 21:08:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Haft-sin, Nowruz
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Katzenfee50, uploaded by 4nn1l2/Yann, nominated by Yann (talk) 21:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 21:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good Ezarateesteban 22:26, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - The background looks like my eyes are crossed and I'm seeing double. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the idea and it is arranged quite nicely, but: Formally, 1) the description really could use a bit more information – at least the single elements of the haft sin should be listed, as is seems that they can vary 2) The book cover is a copyright violation – {{de minimis}} may apply but the file is not marked as such. Photographically speaking, it's not really outstanding imho: busy background; weird light that is neither neutral nor does it add anything in terms of atmosphere; table is awkwardly cut. --El Grafo (talk) 10:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. -- Karelj (talk) 16:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Rosie the Riveter (Vultee) DS.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2019 at 20:45:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A real-life "Rosie the Riveter" operating a hand drill at Vultee-Nashville, Tennessee, working on an A-31 Vengeance dive bomber.
-- Colin (talk) 21:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • You can read the various arguments at en:wp but they are a bit dated (2008) with concerns about large file size (not sure why since WP only displays a thumb). Since Commons is a media repository, and any of the other edits can be derived from the original, and there isn't really anything wrong with the original other than being huge and a little soft if you pixel-peep, I think we should support the original version. Yann, could you offer that as an alt? -- Colin (talk) 21:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Rosie the Riveter, original version

File:FaroPuntadelEste.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 22:48:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Punta del Este lighthouse
fixed tilted, thanks!!! @Uoaei1: Ezarateesteban 16:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Now it is leaning even more --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the picture might need cropping a little on the right hand side. Look in the bottom right corner - there are a few white pixels. Cmao20 (talk) 17:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
See now @Cmao20: --Ezarateesteban 23:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. The motif looks quite ordinary. I´m not sure, whether there is enough wow if it becomes technically perfect.--Milseburg (talk) 18:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg SupportMarinna (talk) 23:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Neither the light nor the composition are very successful in my view. Beside, there's a problem at the top right of the image with an intrusive white line, suggesting a bad crop after perspective correction -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:2017.06.04.-01-Bonsweiher-Moerlenbach--Wald-Erdbeere.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 21:10:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wild strawberry - Fragaria vesca
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hockei (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Technical shortcomings undermine an otherwise good photo. I am a little less forgiving of quality issues on a shot like this than on some of your recent macro photography of butterflies and insects since a shot of a stationary subject is considerably easier to execute. Cmao20 (talk) 17:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • OK. Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination.--Hockei (talk) 11:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:MosMetro KomsomolskayaKL img2 asv2018-01.jpg (delist and replace)[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 15:43:54 (UTC)

Proposed to be delisted Proposed replacement

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Komsomolskaya-KL station of Moscow Metro, all by A.Savin. Here is the original nomination. Now, after some consideration, I have reworked the second picture a bit to give more pleasant levels etc. Although there are no trains, I find this one better, also given the more generous crop on the ceiling. This crop is not possible on the first image. I also think, maybe, it is even better without trains, as they obscure some detail on the wall and they itself are not that nice. So, all in all I think the photo w/o trains should be featured and the photo with trains should then be delisted, because it's very similar.
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --A.Savin 15:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 21:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace - I prefer the proposed replacement because it's brighter. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Cayambe (talk) 07:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Cart (talk) 08:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Nürnberg Kaiserburg obere Kapelle 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 10:07:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Upper chapel of Nuremberg Castle
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interior of the upper chapel of the Imperial Castle, Nuremberg, Middle Franconia, Bavaria, Germany. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The photo is not completely balanced for me. The pillar on the right is cut off at the top. The crucifix in the middle is also somewhat unhappy with regard to the window. The light on the right is also a bit disturbing for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Overall a good quality interior, even considering the above criticisms. Cmao20 (talk) 17:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The pillar on the left is not vertical. At the bottom, there's a disturbing dark part (not horizontal). Shame also the view is asymmetrical. The right pillar is cut -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing so special for FP. -- Karelj (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Sunset over the hills of Amber Cove, 30 December 2018.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 09:36:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Joe deSousa (Flickr) - uploaded & nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 09:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 09:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is a great view with lots of details, but unfortunately it is so heavily over-processed that the highlights in the darker areas look like impressionistic brush strokes even if it is viewed at downsized like 50%. Being a Flickr photo I don't think we will be able to make the author fix this from raw. Pity. --Cart (talk) 11:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cart.--Peulle (talk) 14:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I also count at least 4 dust spots. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cart. --El Grafo (talk) 08:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above. A shame because it makes a beautiful desktop wallpaper. Cmao20 (talk) 17:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 018-033 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 18:58:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Full panoramic view of the landscape around Deadvlei, Namib-Naukluft Park, Namibia.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Full panoramic (360 degrees) view of the unique landscape around Deadvlei, Namib-Naukluft Park, Namibia. All by me, Poco2 18:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support You liked (and promoted) the last pano from the area, this one is IMHO even more impressive, much bigger and of higher quality. -- Poco2 18:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The previous one had an excellent composition, sadly not all 360 degrees panoramas share that quality no matter how big they are. IMO a normal jpeg is often an inferior medium for this kind of panorama since the composition tends to look a bit random. See note. --Cart (talk) 21:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 00:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interesting photo to see the difference of ground in front of / behind the dune. But the composition is completely unbalanced. Two areas cut in the center and the dunes on the sides it does not work for me.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I do get what people mean about this not being the most balanced or aesthetic composition, but the immense resolution and detail make this an impressive technical feat and an important and useful document. Cmao20 (talk) 17:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Restaurant on Ochrid lake Pogradec Albania 2018.2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 17:26:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Small restaurant on a platform by the Lake Ohrid shore in the town Pogradec, Albania, September 2018
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Karelj (talk) 17:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 17:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but focus to main part of the photo is not well done --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distortion, poor light and not very high resolution.--Peulle (talk) 23:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition is good, but vignetting and other technical flaws. Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Weather observations in Antarctica.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 17:01:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Tsy1980 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The place where this photo was taken is wow, but the main person is looking down (and that is not really impressive) --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - She's looking down to get her footing in the snow, I think. I like the form, the interesting apparatus and the stark snowscape with an incline in the distance. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unnatural way of walking which indicates discomfort of receiving a photo --Wilfredor (talk) 01:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I particularly like the way she walks minding her steps so she doesn't stumble in this unnatural environment for humans.--G Furtado (talk) 02:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not the most recent image, but still impressive --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do like the Hoth-ish atmosphere in this, but the composition just isn't awesome. To have someone centered in that vast emptiness looks unbalanced to me, a more panoramic view with more space left or right would have been nice. --Cart (talk) 10:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Simple but effective composition. Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 08:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Michiel and Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Place de l'Horloge in Nimes 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 15:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Place de l'Horloge in Nîmes at night, Gard, France
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Could be a good VI, but I'm not awestruck by the composition, and I'd prefer a more nearly dead-on view of the tower. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the colours, and composition seems OK. We’ve certainly promoted much worse night photography. Cmao20 (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Those colorful lights (green at the left, blue in the center) are too disco for me. Also the composition doesn't work in my view, with this intrusive wall on the left -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Couple of teenagers riding a jestski splashing on the Mekong in Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 10:38:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Couple of teenagers riding a jestski splashing on the Mekong in Laos
  • I think you are right, this compo is better. The other one also has a disturbing log in the background. --Cart (talk) 12:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 00:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support For once a picture of Basile's from the rivers of Laos that doesn't involve bamboo bridges or tropical landscapes Face-smile.svg. Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Langkofel group from Sellajoch Col Rodella Fassa.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 22:25:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Langkofel Group from the Sella pass. From left to right the Plattkofel, Zahnkofel, Grohmann Peak, the Fünffinger Peak, the Langkofelscharte and the Langkofeleck

File:Ida Paul & Kalle Lindroth - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 08.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 21:54:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ida Paul performing.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Teevee - uploaded by User:Teevee - nominated by Teevee -- Teevee (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Teevee (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice portrait, good composition. --Yann (talk) 23:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Yann. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 07:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:59, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 12:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not sure about the title though since Kalle Lindroth is not in the picture. --Cart (talk) 13:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but misleading filename should be changed --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Crop on both sides is too tight. Also the guitar below shouldn't be cut. --Hockei (talk) 18:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Here is another one with the whole guitar and a bit more air on the right. I feel the focus a bit too far in the back in this one. --Teevee (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Smial (talk) 23:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Some small faults but given how hard it is to get this kind of shot right and how much does go right with it, I'm letting them go. Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Galerie Perrotin Ceiling Detail.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 20:02:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Site: Galerie Perrontin
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by ComedyAmy - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 23:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like these kind of image very much. But IMO it is important, that the image is centered and the horizontal lines are horizontal. It's fixable. There are artifacts and problems mit sharpness too. May be this is not fixable. --XRay talk 07:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per XRay. Daniel Case (talk) 15:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Vihorlat (v zime) 046.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 19:56:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vihorlat v zime počas inverzie
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It can be fixed to make it look better. But I don't know if that low cloud was actually in the plane. I had a problem with it on several photos of that day. --Milan Bališin (talk) 15:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose until the tilt is fixed. Yann (talk) 19:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • There is still a tilt IMO. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I don't know, it seems so straight to me? --Milan Bališin (talk) 16:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. If the horizon is tilted, I'm sure you'll fix it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Needs a lot of brightening, snow should be white. -- King of ♠ 01:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - Why should it be white when it's reflecting what looks like late afternoon light near sundown? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It was taken about an hour before sunset. The sun colored the snow into “yellow”. The sunset was around 15:30. The photo was taken at 14:37 (It was Golden hour). --Milan Bališin (talk) 09:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I'll have to Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the image in its current state then. -- King of ♠ 00:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment More photos of the day in The Gallery. On several photos, the snow is yellow (when the sun sets). --Milan Bališin (talk) 16:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, but a bit per Yann and a bit per King (It was my first impression too. Maybe it's slightly too warm.). --Hockei (talk) 07:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I think that the lighting and above all the scenery had lots of FP potential, but I am not quite convinced about the composition here. I'd would probably focused more on a spot where the effect of the wind to the snow/ice is predominant --Poco2 12:28, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Slightly colder WB. would probably be nicer.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Did you sleep up there? --Podzemnik (talk) 02:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Image is overcategorized. --A.Savin 13:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • For example "Vihorlat + Views from Vihorlat", "Frost + White frost", "Golden hour + Golden hour landscapes",... and many more --A.Savin 17:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I have the impression that you are not thinking for yourself... --A.Savin 17:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Help me if there's something else wrong. Thanks. --Milan Bališin (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - He's right. Just to give a few examples: How can you have categories for both Vihorlat and Vihorlat (národná prírodná rezervácia)? It's obvious that one is a parent of the other, isn't it? At the very least, it's redundant. Also, you have numerous snow categories and then "Snow scenery", an obvious parent category. And isn't "Winter landscapes" a parent for one of the other categories? I want you to clean this up before it's featured, and I may have to join A.Savin in opposing if you don't. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I cleared it. I don't know if that's ok. --Milan Bališin (talk) 18:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Much better, but how is Kyjov (vrch vo Vihorlatských vrchoch) different from Vihorlat? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment They are two separate peaks. See notes in the photo. --Milan Bališin (talk) 20:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Got it. I think your categories are good now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special. --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 12:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice montane winter mood. Daniel Case (talk) 15:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Hmla, vrcholky vysokotatranských štítov vyčnievajúce z rannej hmly 002.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 19:42:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vrcholky vysokotatranských štítov vyčnievajúce z rannej hmly

File:Saint-Michel church in Fontenoy (DSCF5104) Antoing, Belgium.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 18:36:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Michael church in Antoing
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belgium
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info by User:Trougnouf
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Trougnouf (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no wow --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:32, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special. The tree obstructs the church. Yann (talk) 23:40, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. A QI and possibly a VI, but not a great composition, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:59, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This one is OK for me. If the sky was bright and blue I have a feeling it would have got a lot more support. But a grey sky doesn’t bother me, and the composition looks good - it’s often tough to find a better angle to shoot churches from I think. Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you. I really like the light in this picture, with the beginning of civil twilight even though the sky is cloudy there is a blue tint to it and it lights up the church beautifully imo. I think the tree is a feature, I like the way it stands next to this modest church and being the right time of the year it doesn't block the view (in contrast with the other version where I unexpectedly happened to bicycle to the same spot again five months later and the tree is too prominent). --Trougnouf (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too ordinary in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Yann. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom, nördliches Seitenschiff -- 2019 -- 3934-8.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 18:34:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Windows in northern aisle of St Paul's Cathedral in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Amiral bruix.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 16:08:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait de l'Amiral Eustache Bruix

File:Vue panoramique du château et de l'arsenal en Penfeld 3Fi079-242.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 10:01:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Merci beaucoup pour cette réponse detaillée. Je n'aurais pas pensé qu'un carte si grand serait possible. C'est tres interessant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:08, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quite an interesting postcard Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good scan of an unusual old item/memorabilia/postcard. Info added to description on file page. (À propos, même si {{LangSwitch}} est élégant, il peut cacher des informations qui ne sont disponibles que dans une des langues des autres lecteurs. Je l'ai changé en description multilingue.) --Cart (talk) 13:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart and Cmao20. This photo should also be nominated at VIC, regardless of whether it passes FPC or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support avec le supplément d'information. --Yann (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Doesn't work so well for me.--Peulle (talk) 23:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting historically to see such a colored card -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Soutiens per les autres. Daniel Case (talk) 15:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Walters Ranch Hop Kiln in 2019.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 02:57:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Walters Ranch Hop Kiln near Healdsburg, Sonoma County, in 2019.

Alternative[edit]

Walters Ranch Hop Kiln in 2019
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the feedback. Here's a new, less cluttered version with stronger perpective correction. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It needs some perspective correction, otherwise looking good --Poco2 12:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Poco, which direction? I'm somewhat lost. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
No, no tilt here, just missing vertical perspective correction to get the verticals vertical (see verticals on the right side leaning in) --Poco2 17:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded a new version. Please note that the building itself isn't straight. Nor are the poles on the right. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:27, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

File:2017.06.21.-01-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Tagpfauenauge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 21:30:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European peacock - Aglais io
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New version. I gave a bit more on both sides. --Hockei (talk) 11:25, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen). (d.j.b.) 18.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 17:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Rain
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This looks like a black and white photo, but it isn't. During heavy rain showers it seemed. that all colors disappeared and there was this grim atmosphere. Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen). Stormy wind and heavy rain showers above Langweerderwielen.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportLucas 17:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Doesn't quite speak to me.--Peulle (talk) 21:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - There's a dust spot right in the upper right corner. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Quite artistic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:08, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lack of details for this relatively small resolution. The trees are unsharp and like noisy. I also find this monochromatic picture a bit depressing -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 10:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is very difficult to capture the concept of 'wind' and rain since even if you and your camera are almost blown away, things usually look rather still in the resulting photo and the rain becomes frozen in a misty layer obscuring details. Also hard to balance the shutter time; if you want visible rain streaks, you get very blurry plants. Here the patterns of bending reeds and gushing water help to make visible the movement of wind and rain. The mono color also helps to bring out the ominous mood in the photo. Category changed to "Rain" since there are no geographical sub-categories in "Natural phenomena". --Cart (talk) 10:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 11:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle. -- Karelj (talk) 13:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I also find it a bit depressing but that's what I like about the photo :) I also like how the plants grow directly from the waves. Otherwise per Cart. But Famberhorst, please add en English description. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you for your comment. W.carter has now added an English description. Thank you very much.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Podzemnik Poco2 12:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'd like to support it. But I cannot be a friend of the monochrome, sorry. --Hockei (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart. --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- This is what water in the Netherlands looks like, quite often. :) Artistic and/or depressing? Yes, both... MartinD (talk) 14:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Animated phenakistiscope disc - Running rats Fantascope by Thomas Mann Baynes 1833.gif[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 03:55:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Animated phenakistiscope disc - Running rats Fantascope by Thomas Mann Baynes 1833
  • I don't understand. Please could you explain which "reason" you're talking about ? Source. For me this is an awesome testimony of an amazing invention -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I find the effect of all the rats running at me unpleasant, but now that I realize this is meant to replicate a historic invention, I've crossed out my oppose vote. I'd support this for VI, but I still don't think a moving GIF actually has the same effect as the Phenakistiscope, because it's so common to see moving GIFs online. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Well, this is a modern technique applied to a 186 year-old document. Personally, I like the kaleidoscopic effect of this creation. But not animated, it would be very static for what it's supposed to show. Yes of course today moving GIFs are common online, but the phenakistiscope is regarded as one of the first forms of moving media entertainment that paved the way for the future motion picture and film industry. Today many trendy websites bring these old precursor drawings to the light. This piece is certainly one of the best quality and highest resolution we can find on the web in 2019 -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • But in the original technique, didn't you just look at "one" of running rats (or procession of rats) through a slit? Like this image shows. Just seeing one running rat would be less dizzying. Seeing this multi-rat version is only possible with gif. Or? --Cart (talk) 14:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • This works like an optical illusion. The retinal persistence is the secret behind these animations. The GIF linked above is also an approximation. Through the hole, in reality we would see 10% images, by interruption at regular intervals, and 90% black foreground (that would be much more dizzying IMO). The advantage here is to see both the whole wheel and the animation. Hypnotizing for many viewers Face-glasses.svg Face-grin.svg. Today young and creative designers like Ana Taberko use this old invention for modern designs (it sounds like we can make new dishes with old good recipes). Similar FP in German and Persian Wikipedia -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Participantemarcha8M2019CABA.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 01:03:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Participant on action strike of womens 8M 2019 in Buenos Aires
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me Ezarateesteban 01:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ezarateesteban 01:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. The composition looks off with an important object, the ring, cut off awkardly along with her second arm. In general the setting doesn't become clear: why has she the ring? Does the crowd behind her have something to do with it? Does she smile for the crowd or some individual? As it is no story is told and it makes it look like a random snapshot. – Lucas 08:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @Lucasbosch: it was a protest so there was a lot of people and a very difficult place to take photos, the ring is a tool to protest Ezarateesteban 13:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please give a proper name to this file. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The background is kind of noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: I applied a bit denoising but I think that is acceptable for this kind of photos, thanks and regards!! Ezarateesteban 13:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support but I would like more space at the bottom. Yann (talk) 11:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded the entire photo without cropping, a lot of people around me, difficult to take phots, thanks Yann!!
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think a picture like this maybe needs a better caption to clarify what's going on. What was the protest about, and how is the ring being used as a tool for the protest? If I understood this, I'd be happy to support because the image quality is superb, but I don't really understand what I'm seeing at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 12:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks @Cmao20:, I was there as Commons's photographer, I don't have too much idea about this topic, but I investigate in Wikipedia and I improve a bit the description, Regards!! Ezarateesteban 13:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wonderful, and thanks for making the effort. Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very, very good composition --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Lucas, the cut-off ring doesn't work for me. -- King of ♠ 01:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Marinna (talk) 20:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Lucas --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Good picture indeed, but the inevitable background distracts me enough for me not to consider it great. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jalu (talk) 12:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Mont de Sëuc Seiser Alm Montes de Gherdëina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2019 at 20:57:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Seiser Alm and the Gröden Dolomites in South Tyrol.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I can see that only if I really pixel-peep at full size. Is that what you're doing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I can see some of them in the preview and other zoom levels as irregular shapes that could be clouds, but really are the artefacts. Again, the ones placed right above the highest peak are the best example. – Lucas 08:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Moroder: I put notes on your high contrast image. The posterization is a sudden change in brightness and has an irregular shape. – Lucas 14:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I would call those cirrostratus clouds (Schleierwolken). I don't see any posterisation on my Eizo monitor --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • It's possible that there was the "edge" of a cloud at the parting line originally, but as I see it something in the capture and/or post-processing (not necessarily your fault) made a harsh split of tones out of it there, with some speckles inbetween. I don't want to belabor this any more, I see artifacts that I'm convinced are not natural, but if I am alone in this it's okay. I hope it's not caused by my monitor ... – Lucas 17:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Invalid vote : Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Please read the guidelines -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 11:34, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Needs theme music ... Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit warm with regard to color temperature for my taste, but still a fantastic shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Brilliant. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok, it's an alp, so I'm not a fan. But a very, very good photo of an alp. My own photos of this view and the Dolomites are unfortunately lost. --Cart (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 12:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's tempting to print it off and put on my wall. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 06:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Amazing quality like a beautiful painting, however, posterization on the sky. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, there is some mild posterization going on in the sky (Lucas, your monitor is OK). It is difficult to see because there is still some structure in the posterized areas: It takes place in the clouds, but it is very clearly an artifact of digital processing. I'd prefer to see this fixed, but it is a minor issue. --El Grafo (talk) 09:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Carloz Schwabe - Vincent d'Indy's Fervaal.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2019 at 12:28:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fervaal

File:South 3rd Ring Rd west of Yangqiao (20180719154203).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2019 at 00:21:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South 3rd Ring Rd west of Yangqiao
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by N509FZ - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I didn't expect to find this special, based on the thumbnail, but I like the really long sight line and the strange light and colors that combine storm clouds and smog. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the mood and the view but for me the quality is unfortunately not high enough. It is quite visible that it was taken with a cell phone. -- B2Belgium (talk) 08:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Neither composition nor image quality are outstanding --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I actually quite like the composition, but the image quality is not really good enough to be called an FP.--Peulle (talk) 15:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, with regret. Composition is lovely, but I'm not sure the iPhone is really capable of taking pictures of FP quality. Cmao20 (talk) 19:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Uoaei1. --Cart (talk) 11:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Building at 3795 Carey Rd, Saanich, British Columbia, Canada 13.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 20:42:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Building at 3795 Carey Rd, Saanich, British Columbia, Canada
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture#Canada
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's an office building at 3795 Carey Rd, Saanich, British Columbia, Canada -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author. -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I really dislike this type of architecture, but you've captured it very well. Cmao20 (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Cmao20 --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Weirdly enough, I think I'm starting to enjoy brutalism … I like how the various installations on the roof make it look like the bridge section of an ocean liner. --El Grafo (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Abzeronow (talk) 17:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 18:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I know the light trails are unavoidable with a 30-second exposure at that time of night, but that doesn't make them less distracting to me. They focus way too much of my attention. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice light, but this modern building is really ordinary. Beside, I find the colors oversaturated -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others – Lucas 08:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I didn't make any saturation adjustments, it's just the end of the blue hour. I had a version without the light trails, too, but I found this one more entertaining. The building is by a busy highway and I thought including the light trails would be a good representation of it. --Podzemnik (talk) 14:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Perhaps vibrance is too strong, as the yellows are very intense. Concerning the light trails, I agree they're distracting because the street is partly cut. They look intrusive, since they strike out both the sign and the building, making the composition really busy at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 01:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile Morin; This image is in good quality, but the building is very ordinary. Tournasol7 (talk) 08:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above, you did a good job but I don't see this subject featureable --Poco2 12:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per others, after much pondering. Yann (talk) 19:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Chapel Interior 4, Royal Holloway, University of London - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 20:22:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The interior of the chapel at Royal Holloway, University of London
  • Invalid vote : Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Please read the guidelines -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The spots on the wall lit by the sun look pretty awkward, like a blur --Poco2 12:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco --Milseburg (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Planken Wambuis locatie omgeving Mossel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 17:15:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena #Fog.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Walking the Planken Wambuis from Mossel. Morning mist hangs over the Planken Wambuis.
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice fog picture. --Hockei (talk) 20:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautifully atmospheric and a clear FP. Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 08:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Love the fog and the location, but the image is not quite there for me. It lacks a clear subject or compositional idea for me: Neither the raspberry (?) scrub on the left nor the tree/hedge on the right are particularly interesting, but they dominate the scene, distracting from the nice-looking tree in the background. Or, if you say they are supposed to be the subject, then that nice-looking tree in the background distracts from that. The white balance is too warm for my taste, makes it look more like a sand storm rather than a foggy day. Or maybe not warm enough, if this was a golden hour shot (but it doesn't look like one to me) --El Grafo (talk) 10:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with El Grafo. The two shrubs, left and right, are not very nice and distract from the two central trees. I don't mind the WB, but the composition doesn't convince me. As an artistic photo, with mainly fog and no distinct subject, we need a better disposition of the elements in this space. Perhaps too much random here, or only shapes almost hidden. Immediately my eyes go to the right and feel not rewarded -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others: Nice mood, but the composition doesn't really add up fully for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I have to agree with Ikan, it doesn't come through completely. --Cart (talk) 10:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Karelj (talk) 13:51, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Still a nice idea. I'd have probably supported if the 3 trees would have looked similar (kind of pattern) Poco2 12:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Very typical Dutch weather. :) MartinD (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Charles-Antoine Cambon - La Esmeralda, Act 3, Scene 2 set.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 06:11:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

La Esmeralda, Act 3, Scene 2

File:Lower Manhattan from Governors Island (71943).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2019 at 06:10:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lower Manhattan viewed from Governors Island
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - Is there a category for "Lower Manhattan Skyline" or "Downtown Manhattan Skyline"? If so, I'd suggest adding it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The size is not huge and the crop at the right a bit tight, but they are minor issues. Nice helicopter and image notes -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC) update after new upload -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very nice image, but not outstanding compared to other images of the same subject. The composition/crop feels a bit crammed at the sides, the level of detail is not that great and the position of the sun makes for a rather flat image. In my opinion, all of this is handled better in File:Lower Manhattan from Governors Island September 2016 panorama 2.jpg. The chopper is about the only thing that sets it apart from similar views and I'm afraid that's not quite enough for me. All that being said, the image notes are very useful, so I think this would make an excellent VI. --El Grafo (talk) 09:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose File:Lower Manhattan from Governors Island September 2016 panorama 2.jpg works much better for me. Charles (talk) 11:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Charles. The composition and light is better in the other photo, which is also higher resolution. The helicopter isn't positioned and directed optimally to enhance the photo. -- Colin (talk) 15:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very instructive The image quality is very good and the informative label work sets it apart positively from other good images of this motif. --Milseburg (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Milseburg --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others, right crop is too tight --Poco2 20:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
    The new crop is better, moving now to Symbol neutral vote.svg NeutralPoco2 09:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, per Colin and Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice capture with the helicopter. Cmao20 (talk) 20:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles and others --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The new version is much better, changed to Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Time went by between editing and uploading and I guess I didn't realize some space got lost while fixing perspectives (I think that's what happened anyway). So there's a new version which addresses the right crop. Obviously this doesn't address other issues brought up, so I doubt this will change much, but I would be remiss if I didn't upload and ping commenters anyway. :) @Uoaei1, Cmao20, Daniel Case, Poco a poco, Palauenc05: — Rhododendrites talk |  14:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Better, but I still prefer the other one. Charles (talk) 15:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Much better, but I also still prefer the other one. --El Grafo (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • It's fine. The other photo is bigger, but both compositions are good and I think it's not overkill to have a couple of FPs of the Downtown Manhattan skyline. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Same reasoning as Ikan. I would support the other image too for its superior resolution, but the helicopter makes this one a little different. Thanks for providing the improved crop. Cmao20 (talk) 19:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:06, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The helicopter is nice, but isn't special enough to make me support a 10.6 MP cityscape with blue sky and no clouds. -- King of ♠ 01:49, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Image:AB Schoental Kuehruhgraben.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2019 at 22:04:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aschaffenburg, Schoental, Kuehruhgraben
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by KaiBorgeest - uploaded by KaiBorgeest - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Lovely light, colors and composition, similar to a good painted landscape. I predict, though, that it will have trouble with people who think compositions like this one are too "busy". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The painting-like character of this shot makes it special. It's almost as if pictorialism made a comeback. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Indeed it seems busy at thumb, but when you look at it in full size it opens up a bit. Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too busy. Charles (talk) 11:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Seems oddly light, like there isn't really much dark or black. Also wonder if the colour temp is a little blue. Overall it is ok, but I'm not getting much wow compared to some forests we've had with shafts of light or a clear composition. -- Colin (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin.--Fischer.H (talk) 18:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The focus is at the quite uninteresting foreground, light and colors are unnatural. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Uoaei1 --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dull light and colors, unsharp, busy composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose A good, well-composed photo but it doesn't really wow me, plus the background is not sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 20:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Jpcomic (talk) 08:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Invalid vote : Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Please read the guidelines. Also you need to explain your vote when opposing -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The foreground plant doesn't make for an attractive composition. --Trougnouf (talk) 19:44, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Félix, Torralba de Ribota, Zaragoza, España, 2018-04-04, DD 57-59 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2019 at 20:22:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling in the church of St Felix, Torralba de Ribota, province of Zaragoza, Spain.


Delisting candidates[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:2017.06.03.-14-Anglerteiche-Rimbach--Spitzenfleck-Maennchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 12:01:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scarce chaser - Libellula fulva, male.

File:Wells Cathedral Nave Photograph.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 06:58:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wells Cathedral Nave

MAV Canidae[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2019 at 06:33:09 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Bases on previous discussion, I gather all Canidae skeletons displayed at MAV - edited by Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton - uploaded by Joalpe and Sturm - nominated by -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 06:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 06:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - There are certainly differences in the way these skeletons are photographed. For example, some are yellower or darker than others. But overall, this is a notable achievement, even if a little eerie. Also, it's fitting but in a way odd that one of the skeletons is of a mutt, because there are so many different mixtures possible in a mutt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't see how this is different to Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/MAV I. Canidae is a huge family of creatures. As others have noted, I wouldn't expect a collection of Lez's shells to be nominated as a set, or a collection of Jee's butterflies to be nominated as a set. The final one (Saint Bernard dog) is poor quality. As the FP page says: "Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats". Here we have a few species/breeds of canids: there are 34 species, and hundreds of breeds of dogs. The fact that this may be the entire collection currently at MAV isn't IMO enough to make this a set, it just tells me that their collection is rather limited. -- Colin (talk) 08:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Certainly good VI candidates, but this one is relatively small and the head is unsharp, this one has blown highlights. I don't think each of them would be promoted if they were nominated separately, thus I don't see why they should be as a set -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Haft-sin, Nowruz, Still-life-3205068.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2019 at 21:08:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Haft-sin, Nowruz
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Katzenfee50, uploaded by 4nn1l2/Yann, nominated by Yann (talk) 21:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 21:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good Ezarateesteban 22:26, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - The background looks like my eyes are crossed and I'm seeing double. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the idea and it is arranged quite nicely, but: Formally, 1) the description really could use a bit more information – at least the single elements of the haft sin should be listed, as is seems that they can vary 2) The book cover is a copyright violation – {{de minimis}} may apply but the file is not marked as such. Photographically speaking, it's not really outstanding imho: busy background; weird light that is neither neutral nor does it add anything in terms of atmosphere; table is awkwardly cut. --El Grafo (talk) 10:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. -- Karelj (talk) 16:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Rosie the Riveter (Vultee) DS.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2019 at 20:45:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A real-life "Rosie the Riveter" operating a hand drill at Vultee-Nashville, Tennessee, working on an A-31 Vengeance dive bomber.
-- Colin (talk) 21:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • You can read the various arguments at en:wp but they are a bit dated (2008) with concerns about large file size (not sure why since WP only displays a thumb). Since Commons is a media repository, and any of the other edits can be derived from the original, and there isn't really anything wrong with the original other than being huge and a little soft if you pixel-peep, I think we should support the original version. Yann, could you offer that as an alt? -- Colin (talk) 21:29, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Rosie the Riveter, original version

File:FaroPuntadelEste.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 22:48:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Punta del Este lighthouse
fixed tilted, thanks!!! @Uoaei1: Ezarateesteban 16:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Now it is leaning even more --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the picture might need cropping a little on the right hand side. Look in the bottom right corner - there are a few white pixels. Cmao20 (talk) 17:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
See now @Cmao20: --Ezarateesteban 23:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. The motif looks quite ordinary. I´m not sure, whether there is enough wow if it becomes technically perfect.--Milseburg (talk) 18:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg SupportMarinna (talk) 23:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Neither the light nor the composition are very successful in my view. Beside, there's a problem at the top right of the image with an intrusive white line, suggesting a bad crop after perspective correction -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:2017.06.04.-01-Bonsweiher-Moerlenbach--Wald-Erdbeere.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 21:10:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wild strawberry - Fragaria vesca
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hockei (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Technical shortcomings undermine an otherwise good photo. I am a little less forgiving of quality issues on a shot like this than on some of your recent macro photography of butterflies and insects since a shot of a stationary subject is considerably easier to execute. Cmao20 (talk) 17:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • OK. Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination.--Hockei (talk) 11:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:MosMetro KomsomolskayaKL img2 asv2018-01.jpg (delist and replace)[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 15:43:54 (UTC)

Proposed to be delisted Proposed replacement

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Komsomolskaya-KL station of Moscow Metro, all by A.Savin. Here is the original nomination. Now, after some consideration, I have reworked the second picture a bit to give more pleasant levels etc. Although there are no trains, I find this one better, also given the more generous crop on the ceiling. This crop is not possible on the first image. I also think, maybe, it is even better without trains, as they obscure some detail on the wall and they itself are not that nice. So, all in all I think the photo w/o trains should be featured and the photo with trains should then be delisted, because it's very similar.
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --A.Savin 15:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 21:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace - I prefer the proposed replacement because it's brighter. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Cayambe (talk) 07:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Cart (talk) 08:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Nürnberg Kaiserburg obere Kapelle 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 10:07:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Upper chapel of Nuremberg Castle
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interior of the upper chapel of the Imperial Castle, Nuremberg, Middle Franconia, Bavaria, Germany. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The photo is not completely balanced for me. The pillar on the right is cut off at the top. The crucifix in the middle is also somewhat unhappy with regard to the window. The light on the right is also a bit disturbing for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Overall a good quality interior, even considering the above criticisms. Cmao20 (talk) 17:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The pillar on the left is not vertical. At the bottom, there's a disturbing dark part (not horizontal). Shame also the view is asymmetrical. The right pillar is cut -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing so special for FP. -- Karelj (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Sunset over the hills of Amber Cove, 30 December 2018.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2019 at 09:36:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Joe deSousa (Flickr) - uploaded & nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 09:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 09:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is a great view with lots of details, but unfortunately it is so heavily over-processed that the highlights in the darker areas look like impressionistic brush strokes even if it is viewed at downsized like 50%. Being a Flickr photo I don't think we will be able to make the author fix this from raw. Pity. --Cart (talk) 11:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cart.--Peulle (talk) 14:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I also count at least 4 dust spots. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cart. --El Grafo (talk) 08:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above. A shame because it makes a beautiful desktop wallpaper. Cmao20 (talk) 17:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 018-033 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 18:58:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Full panoramic view of the landscape around Deadvlei, Namib-Naukluft Park, Namibia.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Full panoramic (360 degrees) view of the unique landscape around Deadvlei, Namib-Naukluft Park, Namibia. All by me, Poco2 18:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support You liked (and promoted) the last pano from the area, this one is IMHO even more impressive, much bigger and of higher quality. -- Poco2 18:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The previous one had an excellent composition, sadly not all 360 degrees panoramas share that quality no matter how big they are. IMO a normal jpeg is often an inferior medium for this kind of panorama since the composition tends to look a bit random. See note. --Cart (talk) 21:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 00:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interesting photo to see the difference of ground in front of / behind the dune. But the composition is completely unbalanced. Two areas cut in the center and the dunes on the sides it does not work for me.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I do get what people mean about this not being the most balanced or aesthetic composition, but the immense resolution and detail make this an impressive technical feat and an important and useful document. Cmao20 (talk) 17:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Restaurant on Ochrid lake Pogradec Albania 2018.2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 17:26:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Small restaurant on a platform by the Lake Ohrid shore in the town Pogradec, Albania, September 2018
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Karelj (talk) 17:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 17:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but focus to main part of the photo is not well done --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distortion, poor light and not very high resolution.--Peulle (talk) 23:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition is good, but vignetting and other technical flaws. Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Weather observations in Antarctica.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 17:01:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Tsy1980 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The place where this photo was taken is wow, but the main person is looking down (and that is not really impressive) --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - She's looking down to get her footing in the snow, I think. I like the form, the interesting apparatus and the stark snowscape with an incline in the distance. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unnatural way of walking which indicates discomfort of receiving a photo --Wilfredor (talk) 01:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I particularly like the way she walks minding her steps so she doesn't stumble in this unnatural environment for humans.--G Furtado (talk) 02:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not the most recent image, but still impressive --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do like the Hoth-ish atmosphere in this, but the composition just isn't awesome. To have someone centered in that vast emptiness looks unbalanced to me, a more panoramic view with more space left or right would have been nice. --Cart (talk) 10:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Simple but effective composition. Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 08:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Michiel and Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Place de l'Horloge in Nimes 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 15:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Place de l'Horloge in Nîmes at night, Gard, France
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Could be a good VI, but I'm not awestruck by the composition, and I'd prefer a more nearly dead-on view of the tower. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the colours, and composition seems OK. We’ve certainly promoted much worse night photography. Cmao20 (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:40, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Those colorful lights (green at the left, blue in the center) are too disco for me. Also the composition doesn't work in my view, with this intrusive wall on the left -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Couple of teenagers riding a jestski splashing on the Mekong in Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2019 at 10:38:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Couple of teenagers riding a jestski splashing on the Mekong in Laos
  • I think you are right, this compo is better. The other one also has a disturbing log in the background. --Cart (talk) 12:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 00:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support For once a picture of Basile's from the rivers of Laos that doesn't involve bamboo bridges or tropical landscapes Face-smile.svg. Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Langkofel group from Sellajoch Col Rodella Fassa.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 22:25:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Langkofel Group from the Sella pass. From left to right the Plattkofel, Zahnkofel, Grohmann Peak, the Fünffinger Peak, the Langkofelscharte and the Langkofeleck

File:Ida Paul & Kalle Lindroth - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 08.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 21:54:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ida Paul performing.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Teevee - uploaded by User:Teevee - nominated by Teevee -- Teevee (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Teevee (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice portrait, good composition. --Yann (talk) 23:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Yann. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 07:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:59, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco2 12:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not sure about the title though since Kalle Lindroth is not in the picture. --Cart (talk) 13:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but misleading filename should be changed --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Crop on both sides is too tight. Also the guitar below shouldn't be cut. --Hockei (talk) 18:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Here is another one with the whole guitar and a bit more air on the right. I feel the focus a bit too far in the back in this one. --Teevee (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Smial (talk) 23:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Some small faults but given how hard it is to get this kind of shot right and how much does go right with it, I'm letting them go. Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Galerie Perrotin Ceiling Detail.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 20:02:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Site: Galerie Perrontin
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by ComedyAmy - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 23:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like these kind of image very much. But IMO it is important, that the image is centered and the horizontal lines are horizontal. It's fixable. There are artifacts and problems mit sharpness too. May be this is not fixable. --XRay talk 07:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per XRay. Daniel Case (talk) 15:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Vihorlat (v zime) 046.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 19:56:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vihorlat v zime počas inverzie
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It can be fixed to make it look better. But I don't know if that low cloud was actually in the plane. I had a problem with it on several photos of that day. --Milan Bališin (talk) 15:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose until the tilt is fixed. Yann (talk) 19:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • There is still a tilt IMO. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I don't know, it seems so straight to me? --Milan Bališin (talk) 16:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. If the horizon is tilted, I'm sure you'll fix it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Needs a lot of brightening, snow should be white. -- King of ♠ 01:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - Why should it be white when it's reflecting what looks like late afternoon light near sundown? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It was taken about an hour before sunset. The sun colored the snow into “yellow”. The sunset was around 15:30. The photo was taken at 14:37 (It was Golden hour). --Milan Bališin (talk) 09:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I'll have to Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the image in its current state then. -- King of ♠ 00:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment More photos of the day in The Gallery. On several photos, the snow is yellow (when the sun sets). --Milan Bališin (talk) 16:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, but a bit per Yann and a bit per King (It was my first impression too. Maybe it's slightly too warm.). --Hockei (talk) 07:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I think that the lighting and above all the scenery had lots of FP potential, but I am not quite convinced about the composition here. I'd would probably focused more on a spot where the effect of the wind to the snow/ice is predominant --Poco2 12:28, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Slightly colder WB. would probably be nicer.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Did you sleep up there? --Podzemnik (talk) 02:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Image is overcategorized. --A.Savin 13:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • For example "Vihorlat + Views from Vihorlat", "Frost + White frost", "Golden hour + Golden hour landscapes",... and many more --A.Savin 17:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I have the impression that you are not thinking for yourself... --A.Savin 17:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Help me if there's something else wrong. Thanks. --Milan Bališin (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - He's right. Just to give a few examples: How can you have categories for both Vihorlat and Vihorlat (národná prírodná rezervácia)? It's obvious that one is a parent of the other, isn't it? At the very least, it's redundant. Also, you have numerous snow categories and then "Snow scenery", an obvious parent category. And isn't "Winter landscapes" a parent for one of the other categories? I want you to clean this up before it's featured, and I may have to join A.Savin in opposing if you don't. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I cleared it. I don't know if that's ok. --Milan Bališin (talk) 18:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Much better, but how is Kyjov (vrch vo Vihorlatských vrchoch) different from Vihorlat? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment They are two separate peaks. See notes in the photo. --Milan Bališin (talk) 20:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Got it. I think your categories are good now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing special. --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 12:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice montane winter mood. Daniel Case (talk) 15:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Hmla, vrcholky vysokotatranských štítov vyčnievajúce z rannej hmly 002.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 19:42:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vrcholky vysokotatranských štítov vyčnievajúce z rannej hmly

File:Saint-Michel church in Fontenoy (DSCF5104) Antoing, Belgium.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 18:36:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Michael church in Antoing
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belgium
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info by User:Trougnouf
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Trougnouf (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no wow --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:32, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing special. The tree obstructs the church. Yann (talk) 23:40, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. A QI and possibly a VI, but not a great composition, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:59, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This one is OK for me. If the sky was bright and blue I have a feeling it would have got a lot more support. But a grey sky doesn’t bother me, and the composition looks good - it’s often tough to find a better angle to shoot churches from I think. Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you. I really like the light in this picture, with the beginning of civil twilight even though the sky is cloudy there is a blue tint to it and it lights up the church beautifully imo. I think the tree is a feature, I like the way it stands next to this modest church and being the right time of the year it doesn't block the view (in contrast with the other version where I unexpectedly happened to bicycle to the same spot again five months later and the tree is too prominent). --Trougnouf (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too ordinary in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Yann. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom, nördliches Seitenschiff -- 2019 -- 3934-8.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 18:34:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Windows in northern aisle of St Paul's Cathedral in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Amiral bruix.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 16:08:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait de l'Amiral Eustache Bruix

File:Vue panoramique du château et de l'arsenal en Penfeld 3Fi079-242.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 10:01:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Merci beaucoup pour cette réponse detaillée. Je n'aurais pas pensé qu'un carte si grand serait possible. C'est tres interessant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:08, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quite an interesting postcard Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good scan of an unusual old item/memorabilia/postcard. Info added to description on file page. (À propos, même si {{LangSwitch}} est élégant, il peut cacher des informations qui ne sont disponibles que dans une des langues des autres lecteurs. Je l'ai changé en description multilingue.) --Cart (talk) 13:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart and Cmao20. This photo should also be nominated at VIC, regardless of whether it passes FPC or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support avec le supplément d'information. --Yann (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Doesn't work so well for me.--Peulle (talk) 23:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting historically to see such a colored card -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Soutiens per les autres. Daniel Case (talk) 15:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Walters Ranch Hop Kiln in 2019.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2019 at 02:57:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Walters Ranch Hop Kiln near Healdsburg, Sonoma County, in 2019.

Alternative[edit]

Walters Ranch Hop Kiln in 2019
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the feedback. Here's a new, less cluttered version with stronger perpective correction. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It needs some perspective correction, otherwise looking good --Poco2 12:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Poco, which direction? I'm somewhat lost. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
No, no tilt here, just missing vertical perspective correction to get the verticals vertical (see verticals on the right side leaning in) --Poco2 17:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded a new version. Please note that the building itself isn't straight. Nor are the poles on the right. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:27, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

File:2017.06.21.-01-Vogelstangsee Mannheim--Tagpfauenauge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 21:30:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European peacock - Aglais io
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New version. I gave a bit more on both sides. --Hockei (talk) 11:25, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen). (d.j.b.) 18.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 17:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Rain
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This looks like a black and white photo, but it isn't. During heavy rain showers it seemed. that all colors disappeared and there was this grim atmosphere. Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen). Stormy wind and heavy rain showers above Langweerderwielen.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportLucas 17:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Doesn't quite speak to me.--Peulle (talk) 21:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - There's a dust spot right in the upper right corner. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Quite artistic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:08, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lack of details for this relatively small resolution. The trees are unsharp and like noisy. I also find this monochromatic picture a bit depressing -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 10:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is very difficult to capture the concept of 'wind' and rain since even if you and your camera are almost blown away, things usually look rather still in the resulting photo and the rain becomes frozen in a misty layer obscuring details. Also hard to balance the shutter time; if you want visible rain streaks, you get very blurry plants. Here the patterns of bending reeds and gushing water help to make visible the movement of wind and rain. The mono color also helps to bring out the ominous mood in the photo. Category changed to "Rain" since there are no geographical sub-categories in "Natural phenomena". --Cart (talk) 10:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 11:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle. -- Karelj (talk) 13:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I also find it a bit depressing but that's what I like about the photo :) I also like how the plants grow directly from the waves. Otherwise per Cart. But Famberhorst, please add en English description. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you for your comment. W.carter has now added an English description. Thank you very much.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Podzemnik Poco2 12:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'd like to support it. But I cannot be a friend of the monochrome, sorry. --Hockei (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart. --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- This is what water in the Netherlands looks like, quite often. :) Artistic and/or depressing? Yes, both... MartinD (talk) 14:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Animated phenakistiscope disc - Running rats Fantascope by Thomas Mann Baynes 1833.gif[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 03:55:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Animated phenakistiscope disc - Running rats Fantascope by Thomas Mann Baynes 1833
  • I don't understand. Please could you explain which "reason" you're talking about ? Source. For me this is an awesome testimony of an amazing invention -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I find the effect of all the rats running at me unpleasant, but now that I realize this is meant to replicate a historic invention, I've crossed out my oppose vote. I'd support this for VI, but I still don't think a moving GIF actually has the same effect as the Phenakistiscope, because it's so common to see moving GIFs online. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Well, this is a modern technique applied to a 186 year-old document. Personally, I like the kaleidoscopic effect of this creation. But not animated, it would be very static for what it's supposed to show. Yes of course today moving GIFs are common online, but the phenakistiscope is regarded as one of the first forms of moving media entertainment that paved the way for the future motion picture and film industry. Today many trendy websites bring these old precursor drawings to the light. This piece is certainly one of the best quality and highest resolution we can find on the web in 2019 -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • But in the original technique, didn't you just look at "one" of running rats (or procession of rats) through a slit? Like this image shows. Just seeing one running rat would be less dizzying. Seeing this multi-rat version is only possible with gif. Or? --Cart (talk) 14:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • This works like an optical illusion. The retinal persistence is the secret behind these animations. The GIF linked above is also an approximation. Through the hole, in reality we would see 10% images, by interruption at regular intervals, and 90% black foreground (that would be much more dizzying IMO). The advantage here is to see both the whole wheel and the animation. Hypnotizing for many viewers Face-glasses.svg Face-grin.svg. Today young and creative designers like Ana Taberko use this old invention for modern designs (it sounds like we can make new dishes with old good recipes). Similar FP in German and Persian Wikipedia -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Participantemarcha8M2019CABA.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2019 at 01:03:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Participant on action strike of womens 8M 2019 in Buenos Aires
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me Ezarateesteban 01:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ezarateesteban 01:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. The composition looks off with an important object, the ring, cut off awkardly along with her second arm. In general the setting doesn't become clear: why has she the ring? Does the crowd behind her have something to do with it? Does she smile for the crowd or some individual? As it is no story is told and it makes it look like a random snapshot. – Lucas 08:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • @Lucasbosch: it was a protest so there was a lot of people and a very difficult place to take photos, the ring is a tool to protest Ezarateesteban 13:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please give a proper name to this file. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The background is kind of noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: I applied a bit denoising but I think that is acceptable for this kind of photos, thanks and regards!! Ezarateesteban 13:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support but I would like more space at the bottom. Yann (talk) 11:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded the entire photo without cropping, a lot of people around me, difficult to take phots, thanks Yann!!
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think a picture like this maybe needs a better caption to clarify what's going on. What was the protest about, and how is the ring being used as a tool for the protest? If I understood this, I'd be happy to support because the image quality is superb, but I don't really understand what I'm seeing at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 12:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks @Cmao20:, I was there as Commons's photographer, I don't have too much idea about this topic, but I investigate in Wikipedia and I improve a bit the description, Regards!! Ezarateesteban 13:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wonderful, and thanks for making the effort. Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very, very good composition --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Lucas, the cut-off ring doesn't work for me. -- King of ♠ 01:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Marinna (talk) 20:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Lucas --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Good picture indeed, but the inevitable background distracts me enough for me not to consider it great. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jalu (talk) 12:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Mont de Sëuc Seiser Alm Montes de Gherdëina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2019 at 20:57:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Seiser Alm and the Gröden Dolomites in South Tyrol.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I can see that only if I really pixel-peep at full size. Is that what you're doing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I can see some of them in the preview and other zoom levels as irregular shapes that could be clouds, but really are the artefacts. Again, the ones placed right above the highest peak are the best example. – Lucas 08:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Moroder: I put notes on your high contrast image. The posterization is a sudden change in brightness and has an irregular shape. – Lucas 14:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I would call those cirrostratus clouds (Schleierwolken). I don't see any posterisation on my Eizo monitor --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • It's possible that there was the "edge" of a cloud at the parting line originally, but as I see it something in the capture and/or post-processing (not necessarily your fault) made a harsh split of tones out of it there, with some speckles inbetween. I don't want to belabor this any more, I see artifacts that I'm convinced are not natural, but if I am alone in this it's okay. I hope it's not caused by my monitor ... – Lucas 17:55, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Invalid vote : Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Please read the guidelines -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 11:34, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Needs theme music ... Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit warm with regard to color temperature for my taste, but still a fantastic shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Brilliant. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok, it's an alp, so I'm not a fan. But a very, very good photo of an alp. My own photos of this view and the Dolomites are unfortunately lost. --Cart (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 12:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's tempting to print it off and put on my wall. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 06:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Amazing quality like a beautiful painting, however, posterization on the sky. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, there is some mild posterization going on in the sky (Lucas, your monitor is OK). It is difficult to see because there is still some structure in the posterized areas: It takes place in the clouds, but it is very clearly an artifact of digital processing. I'd prefer to see this fixed, but it is a minor issue. --El Grafo (talk) 09:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Carloz Schwabe - Vincent d'Indy's Fervaal.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2019 at 12:28:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fervaal

File:South 3rd Ring Rd west of Yangqiao (20180719154203).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2019 at 00:21:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South 3rd Ring Rd west of Yangqiao
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by N509FZ - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I didn't expect to find this special, based on the thumbnail, but I like the really long sight line and the strange light and colors that combine storm clouds and smog. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the mood and the view but for me the quality is unfortunately not high enough. It is quite visible that it was taken with a cell phone. -- B2Belgium (talk) 08:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Neither composition nor image quality are outstanding --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I actually quite like the composition, but the image quality is not really good enough to be called an FP.--Peulle (talk) 15:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, with regret. Composition is lovely, but I'm not sure the iPhone is really capable of taking pictures of FP quality. Cmao20 (talk) 19:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Uoaei1. --Cart (talk) 11:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Building at 3795 Carey Rd, Saanich, British Columbia, Canada 13.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 20:42:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Building at 3795 Carey Rd, Saanich, British Columbia, Canada
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture#Canada
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's an office building at 3795 Carey Rd, Saanich, British Columbia, Canada -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author. -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I really dislike this type of architecture, but you've captured it very well. Cmao20 (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Cmao20 --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Weirdly enough, I think I'm starting to enjoy brutalism … I like how the various installations on the roof make it look like the bridge section of an ocean liner. --El Grafo (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Abzeronow (talk) 17:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 18:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I know the light trails are unavoidable with a 30-second exposure at that time of night, but that doesn't make them less distracting to me. They focus way too much of my attention. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice light, but this modern building is really ordinary. Beside, I find the colors oversaturated -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others – Lucas 08:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I didn't make any saturation adjustments, it's just the end of the blue hour. I had a version without the light trails, too, but I found this one more entertaining. The building is by a busy highway and I thought including the light trails would be a good representation of it. --Podzemnik (talk) 14:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Perhaps vibrance is too strong, as the yellows are very intense. Concerning the light trails, I agree they're distracting because the street is partly cut. They look intrusive, since they strike out both the sign and the building, making the composition really busy at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 01:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile Morin; This image is in good quality, but the building is very ordinary. Tournasol7 (talk) 08:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above, you did a good job but I don't see this subject featureable --Poco2 12:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per others, after much pondering. Yann (talk) 19:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Chapel Interior 4, Royal Holloway, University of London - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 20:22:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The interior of the chapel at Royal Holloway, University of London
  • Invalid vote : Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Please read the guidelines -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The spots on the wall lit by the sun look pretty awkward, like a blur --Poco2 12:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco --Milseburg (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Planken Wambuis locatie omgeving Mossel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 17:15:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena #Fog.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Walking the Planken Wambuis from Mossel. Morning mist hangs over the Planken Wambuis.
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice fog picture. --Hockei (talk) 20:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautifully atmospheric and a clear FP. Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 08:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Love the fog and the location, but the image is not quite there for me. It lacks a clear subject or compositional idea for me: Neither the raspberry (?) scrub on the left nor the tree/hedge on the right are particularly interesting, but they dominate the scene, distracting from the nice-looking tree in the background. Or, if you say they are supposed to be the subject, then that nice-looking tree in the background distracts from that. The white balance is too warm for my taste, makes it look more like a sand storm rather than a foggy day. Or maybe not warm enough, if this was a golden hour shot (but it doesn't look like one to me) --El Grafo (talk) 10:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with El Grafo. The two shrubs, left and right, are not very nice and distract from the two central trees. I don't mind the WB, but the composition doesn't convince me. As an artistic photo, with mainly fog and no distinct subject, we need a better disposition of the elements in this space. Perhaps too much random here, or only shapes almost hidden. Immediately my eyes go to the right and feel not rewarded -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others: Nice mood, but the composition doesn't really add up fully for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I have to agree with Ikan, it doesn't come through completely. --Cart (talk) 10:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. -- Karelj (talk) 13:51, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Still a nice idea. I'd have probably supported if the 3 trees would have looked similar (kind of pattern) Poco2 12:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Very typical Dutch weather. :) MartinD (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Charles-Antoine Cambon - La Esmeralda, Act 3, Scene 2 set.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2019 at 06:11:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

La Esmeralda, Act 3, Scene 2

File:Lower Manhattan from Governors Island (71943).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2019 at 06:10:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.