# Commons:Candidates a imáxenes destacaes

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | հայերեն | +/−

Si creyes qu'hai dalguna semeya o imaxe na andecha abondo guapa como pa tar ente les imáxenes destacaes, entós pues amestala na llista de candidatures editando nesti enllaz. Si hay consensu xeneral depués de 10 díes, la imaxe tresferiráse a imáxenes destacaes.

## Featured picture candidates

### File:20181206-FS-APACHE-SITGREAVES-LSC-0241 (33334016438) (cropped).jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 07:38:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service/Lance Cheung - uploaded by Kingsif - nominated by Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 07:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kingsif (talk) 07:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose composition with digger behind his head Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. The composition does not work for me either. --Cayambe (talk) 12:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others, and too much noise --Llez (talk) 15:10, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Comet NEOWISE (50155614036).jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 05:53:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Exterior facade of Residence Bassac at blue hour, town of Champasak, Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 03:09:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:หอระฆัง พระบรมมหาราชวัง กรุงเทพมหานคร ประเทศไทย.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 03:07:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Филип Велковски.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2020 at 22:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Pupa de coccinélido, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2020-06-27, DD 285-298 FS.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2020 at 15:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Neue Burg, Hofburg, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 143-145 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2020 at 14:57:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Proses Nembok, Salah Satu Tahapan Membatik Tulis.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2020 at 23:18:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:A girl set fire to cook breakfast by using a coal-filled clay pot; July 2014.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2020 at 23:19:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
•  Info created by Gumilang Aryo Sahadewo - uploaded by Rachmat04 - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 23:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 23:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Please add {{PR}} in the file page for every pictures displaying recognizable people. Nice image but I think too noisy for FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Done. Thanks! ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 02:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Quality so-so, a bit tight left crop, but the moment is there. --Mile (talk) 08:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
• I like this a lot. I wonder about the front of her hair, though. It appears to be more than noise -- is it a light spot caused by steam? — Rhododendrites talk |  13:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Split Cathedral Bell Tower From The Vestibule - Split.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2020 at 11:51:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Bargerveen 23-08-2019. (d.j.b). 21.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 16:25:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands Restoring bog.
•  Info Bargerveen Meerstalblok. Peat lake with growing peat bog. Successful recovery of bog in Bargerveen, province of Drenthe on the German border. A project in collaboration with Germany.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Useful photo, but no great composition to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Maybe not the most obvious wow-factor but I like the composition, it's the kind of photo that grows on you after a while Cmao20 (talk) 22:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not special enough in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kekek --Fischer.H (talk) 17:18, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 20:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

### Alternative, another version

• Weak  Oppose Both these photos have a very interesting midground and background, but their common flaw is the foreground, which at best fails to draw the viewer in and at worst distracts from the image. Such a shame, because the patterns in the water are really nice. -- King of ♥ 08:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The composition in this version works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:PK Kirthar NP asv2020-02 img04.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 15:29:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Site des Orgues 031.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 13:43:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Mamoru Shigemitsu signs the Instrument of Surrender, officially ending the Second World War.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 09:49:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
•  Info created by Army Signal Corps photographer LT. Stephen E. Korpanty - uploaded by Adam Cuerden - nominated by TheFreeWorld 25 November 2020 09:49 (UTC) -- TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Question It's one of the most important events in history the past hundred years, but what can you tell us of the image quality? It seems quite unsharp and I'm wondering if it's been upscaled.--Peulle (talk) 15:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
@Peulle: Source is straight from the US Navy, so this is almost certainly the best available.Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Question But is it upscaled from the original print size? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: It's possibly at the higher end of dpi, but the question is kind of meaningless because there's no standard dpi.It's at a level that gets all extant detail. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
I assume there are existing prints? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
I mean, this is a scan of one. It's not an inverse of the negative. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
So what's the size of the print that was scanned? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
The Navy doesn't deign to say, alas. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
I see. Oh well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support An immensely historic and important photo, whatever the technical shortcomings. Cmao20 (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao20 --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao20, ultimately. Still interested in the answer to my question, but it pales in importance to this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kingsif (talk) 06:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Englische Rose -The Squire- Raureif-20201107-RM-091853.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 09:34:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### Physalis peruviana

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 05:45:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

### File:Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000 (chainring 50-34, length 172.5mm, 11 speed).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 11:28:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Others
•  Info Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000. This one made me work. The number of photos stacked is actually not so important, if you have a "twilight zone" on the subject, like here. 8, shots and hours.
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support it looks pretty cool--Andrei (talk) 12:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The white background is too bright and having no frame doesn't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
• Charlesjsharp I think there are wannabe rules to avoid watermarks and borders. Beside check the image on the article, the border is always added. Who will want to print outside can add it, the main cause is to represent crankset on Wikipedia. And it represents very well. --Mile (talk) 11:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
• The subject is sharp, but you could have chosen a different background. Image description is misleading. You show a lot more than the crankset. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  SupportRhododendrites talk |  17:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The subject holds no appeal for me, but I can appreciate the effort that went into it, and it's easily the best and most interesting photo of this motif. Cmao20 (talk) 22:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles ... it's a very busy composition, the attempt at simplicity notwithstanding. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Forgive me if this sounds really dumb, but isn't the crankset the part buried behind the nice smooth chainguard? As far as bicycle mechanisms go, it's a nice image, but it looks like the image here is of a branded chainguard Kingsif (talk) 06:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
• No, the black bit. The circle. The guard covering the chain and thus crankset. As I said, that looks like the main focus - the derailleur is in the corner, if you were wanting that to be the focus then it's very badly cropped - since it appears to be covering up the crankset. I was asking if said chainguard is supposed to be considered part of the crankset. Kingsif (talk) 08:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
• I added notations, that is bidon halter in the back. Chainguard - yes and no. On professional bicycles no, on city bikes yes. This is a Pro bike from Giant. Nothing is covering 1st chainring, while front derraileur is set on 2nd chainset (small one). Back of them is plastic bidon holder, mounted on frame. If there some else put notation. --Mile (talk) 15:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Museo di Santa Giulia Coro delle Monache Deposizione Paolo da Caylina Brescia.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 11:02:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 017.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 05:26:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

I don't really see the horizon here and therefore no tilt. With the small heights and distances of ordinary landscape photographs, a curved horizon cannot be attributed to the curvature of the earth. Otherwise the earth would be much smaller. --Milseburg (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
@Milseburg: Actually, on second thought I think it's not mainly height that matters, but focal length. A perfectly rectilinear lens is designed to preserve straight lines, no matter what angle they are viewed from. So a hypothetical horizon that went on in both directions forever should appear as a straight line when photographed from any direction. Suppose our viewpoint is just 1 m off the ground. Then the horizon would appear to be 3.57 km away in all directions (source). If our lens has a 90-degree field of view, then we would expect a straight line 3.57 km away at its nearest point to be ${\displaystyle 3.57{\sqrt {2}}\approx 5.05}$ km away at the two sides of our frame. But the actual horizon is still only 3.57 km away at the two sides, so it will appear curved. Now, height still does matter to some extent. While the ratio between the actual horizon and the ideal horizon may always be ${\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}}$, the vertical angle of approach determines how much the difference is magnified in angular terms. If the camera is at A, the ground below the camera is B, the actual horizon at the center of the frame is C, the actual horizon at the (wlog) left edge of the frame is D, and the ideal horizon at the left edge of the frame is E (i.e. the place where the tangent line at C intersects the plane that defines the left edge of the frame), then increasing ${\displaystyle \angle ADB}$ will increase ${\displaystyle \angle DAE}$, assuming that the ratio ${\displaystyle BD:DE}$ is fixed. And increasing height will increase the vertical angle of approach, because the distance to the horizon increases slower than distance to the ground (namely, at the rate of the square root of height). -- King of ♥ 22:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I can really follow the discussion in English. I know how to calculate visibility. I just meant that you can't push a horizon bent in the ordinary photo onto the curvature of the earth's surface. Anyway, as I said, I can't see this problem here. --Milseburg (talk) 12:54, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Colours and light are very good, I really feel like walking on that path. --Aristeas (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Aristeas, I really like the composition. The light doesn't seem outstanding at first but I think the soft, subtle pastel colours are actually very nice. Cmao20 (talk) 22:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Milseburg --Fischer.H (talk) 17:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's a nice image but besides being sharp and with nice lighting, it doesn't shout to me as anything special that anyone on this trail couldn't have taken quickly. The colors and focus seem like a simple auto setting to me (not that this can't be good, but in this case, there are lots of green spots all over the world and if anyone could whip out a point-and-shoot and achieve something like this there's nothing special, if that makes sense), and the whites over in the top right mute the image. I wasn't going to leave an oppose until I looked at the composition of the trail: it's not center, and it's not hitting the right third, it's just sort of off-center. As a really personal preference, I would have preferred a lower camera angle and a little more of the mound on the left. I can appreciate the positioning of the shadows over the trail, though. Kingsif (talk) 06:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
I did spend quite a bit of time experimenting with this composition; you'll notice that in my series there are no fewer than 6 shots of this scene, each with slightly different framing and lighting, and I thought that this one was the best. The original crop included more of the mound at the left, but for me the extra bit at the far left was superfluous so I cropped it out. Anyways, thanks for the feedback. -- King of ♥ 08:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Corner tower of the Cone and Kimball Building in Red Bluff.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 03:04:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Kandanaar kelan theyyam at Peeleri vayanattukulavan kaavu 10.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 19:32:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info Theyyam (Teyyam, Theyam, Theyyattam) is a popular ritual form of worship in Kerala and Karnataka, India. Theyyam consisted of several thousand-year-old traditions, rituals and customs. There is no stage or curtain or other such arrangements for the performance. The devotees would be standing or some of them would be sitting on a sacred tree in front of the shrine. In short, it is an open theatre.

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the scene is a bit too chaotic for me to know what I'm looking at. I also think the file info page could be a bit better.--Peulle (talk) 08:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Arms and part of the fire cut at the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Maybe if it included the entire fire. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dramatic photo but not an oustanding composition for me, per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 22:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The right crop is the main factor Kingsif (talk) 06:14, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:2017, cuba, jardines aggressor, playa bonita, spineyhead blennie (23700572188).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 15:24:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:School of sardines at the Monterey Bay Aquarium (12056).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 14:47:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
•  Info the Monterey Bay Aquarium Open Ocean exhibit. all by — Rhododendrites talk |  14:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support This exhibit is IMO quite special. It's a big, open, completely dark room with a great big viewing window looking out to somewhat less dark water. It was an exercise in capturing crisp silhouettes with decent contrast and not-completely-blurred fast-moving fish in a dark place. There are obvious technical shortcomings but I think the wow factor makes up for them. Curious what others will think. — Rhododendrites talk |  14:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support a great idea well executed! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 20:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:54, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Big wow and wonderful composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per others: tricky shot well done! --El Grafo (talk) 09:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Really great! --Cart (talk) 10:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Creative use. --Mile (talk) 11:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Andrei (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 09:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Martin. --Aristeas (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Everything has been said - a creative idea well-executed. Cmao20 (talk) 22:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Strong support A very cool picture, in so many ways. Really, we should make it lead image in Public aquarium, because it just ... it explains the concept more eloquently than any words could. Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kingsif (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Lac du Salagou - October 2020.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 14:25:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Puente Arslanagić, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 24.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 13:48:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Bosnia_and_Herzegovina
•  Info I will understand if you oppose because of the power lines, but for me they are not very noticeable and don't spoil a very well-composed and serene photo, with some lovely rich colours and sharp, clear reflections. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice catch, thank you! a while ago though I took the picture, so I exported again with the latest Lr version Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support That's quite beautiful with its long sight lines. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, it's a fine image, but the scene lacks wow factor for me; it just looks like an ordinary set of houses.--Peulle (talk) 08:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Andrei (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Saint Fulcran cathedral of Lodeve 11.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 10:34:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#France
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition and pretty organ. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Why do you cut off the main part of the organ? --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
• In this photo I would like make a focus to this part of pipe organs. Here you have other version. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:54, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment per Uoaei. Quality is superb but I don’t get the composition. --Kreuzschnabel 20:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is very difficult to show only a part of the organ's prospect without the cut off pipes being disturbing.--Ermell (talk) 23:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose per Kreuz, Ermell and Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:National Opera of Lorraine in Nancy (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 10:29:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment This is a beautiful picture in several ways, but the right crop is bugging me because the dark gray object is calling attention to itself and impeding my eye movement. I'm wondering what's to the right of that and whether you could crop a bit further to the right. Alternatively, it might work to crop just to the left of it, though I'd have to see the result. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Very beautiful architecture but I find the light a little bit dull. Cmao20 (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I have to confess that I like really :–). --Aristeas (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Wroclaw - Muzeum Narodowe.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 09:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

### File:Wroclaw - wieza Uniwersytetu Wroclawskiego z ksiezycem w tle.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 09:38:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Poland

### File:Вид на Эльбрус по пути в Джилы-Су.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2020 at 17:41:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Russia
•  Info A beautiful and stark landscape from the Caucasus, with the road used as an effective leading line. created by Ted.ns - uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose too much road. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  SupportRhododendrites talk |  16:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not bad and probably QI, but still I don't think it does the beauty of this region enough justice. --A.Savin 20:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment A very beautiful scene, but I would go for a more aggressive crop. For a road leading into the distance, the easiest way to make it work is to center the entire road, but if the near portion of the road is going to be off-center, then all of the road should be clearly off-center, i.e. some of the right side should be cropped out. Also, because the sky is relatively featureless I would make it take up about 1/4 of the vertical space as opposed to the usual rule of thirds. -- King of ♥ 04:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
• Agree with the featureless sky. Too much currently in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Moderate support As a contributor here who has made a different roadscape work as an FP, I'm favorably disposed to this one. This is autumn, and the landscape is bleak because as the distant mountains are already telling us, winter is coming. Therefore the relatively empty sky complements that bleakness. I do agree with King, however, that not as much of it is needed. Daniel Case (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I like the long sight line down the road, and this photo also appeals to my sense of vicariously being there. Sure, the sky could be cropped, but I support, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support The more I look at it, the more the candidature seems valid as FP for me. Just weak s per my comment above -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel, Paris 3 August 2020.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2020 at 07:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
•  Info created by Pierre Blaché (Flickr) - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 07:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 07:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Could be cropped a little closer on the bottom, but peaceful, spacious and atmospheric. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Still considering it, but my initial reaction is that the Ferris wheel in the background is sufficiently outside of the frame that it comes off as distractingly unbalanced IMO. — Rhododendrites talk |  15:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
+1. I think the image could get closer to being squared up and lose most of what's on the right. Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I actually quite enjoy the space on the right and the peaceful quality it adds to the composition Kingsif (talk) 06:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 07:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Eureka Inn, Entrance Hall.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 14:00:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Comment Unfortunately, there's nothing I can do to make this wider with the material I've got. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support It is a little bit tight, but when you're trying to capture a place like this in one frame, you're going to have to make compromises somewhere. Overall I think the architecture is really lovely and there's a lot to look at here. The image quality is great. Any clue as to the reason for the slightly strange assortment of presidential portraits on the wall (Ford on the left, Reagan on the right, and, if I'm not much mistaken, Herbert Hoover in the middle?) Cmao20 (talk) 11:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose crop at bottom Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support When I saw the image the first thing that came to my mind have been "wow". Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 13:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Ultimately, the composition works for me, even though I would have preferred a crop slightly further right, and it's a unique, beautiful room with a lot to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Per Charles, although I understand that there was probably no better way to take the shot Poco a poco (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support for the same reason Diego opposes. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The crop could have been better, but the edges are barely important with this composition. It's an astounding image, and for a room so packed the colors are all great and it doesn't look busy Kingsif (talk) 06:20, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Hong Kong Light Rail Light Trails.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 10:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro_stations
•  Info created and uploaded by Prosperity Horizons - nominated by IN (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--IN (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Without categories. Except for the light lines little image content.--Ermell (talk) 19:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support It's a composition of light trails, but to my mind, it's a good composition of light trails and works, even if I might prefer a slightly more generous crop on the right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Works for me as well --Kritzolina (talk) 21:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan, yes it's quite simple, but it's striking and works well for me. Cmao20 (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 12:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose does little for me Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The effect is common, so I'd expect more colors or a more interesting background/compo --Poco a poco (talk) 12:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Little content, no wow on my side either, I agree with others -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

### File:Nazareno de San Pablo.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 00:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

It's a sculpture of The Nazarene in the Church of La Chiquinquira, made of wood and using a wig made of human hair. In the seventeenth century, Caracas was struck by the plague of black vomit and at that time, and in the midst of such mortality as a result of the plague, the Nazarene stumbled on the path of the procession, with a lemon tree, entangling in its branches and a large quantity of lemons falling to the ground. "Miracle, Miracle!" Shouted the inhabitants of Caracas, taking said lemons and starting from there a tradition, referring to the healing properties of lemon --Wilfredor (talk) 16:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks. It's a great story and a striking photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
I would just like to clarify that this is an additional religious image is not this, this is another statue of the same saint and same type of devotion. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)--Wilfredor (talk) 22:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
What is an additional image? I'm confused. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
This is not the original image of the Nazarene, it is an image of the Nazarene but in another position, it is not a replica --Wilfredor (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
I see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Well captured and good quality. Cmao20 (talk) 08:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 12:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The hair like real mixed with the sculpted beard doesn't make for an aesthetic combination. Poor design in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above, the statue is not the best artwork --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I agree; it looks almost like a plastic or wax likeness of someone with hair added. However, it's interesting and a well-composed and shot photo, and that's enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Great depth and colors Kingsif (talk) 06:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)