From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion and the translation is 55% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Other languages:
العربية • ‎azərbaycanca • ‎বাংলা • ‎čeština • ‎dansk • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎Canadian English • ‎español • ‎فارسی • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎magyar • ‎italiano • ‎日本語 • ‎ಕನ್ನಡ • ‎한국어 • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎македонски • ‎മലയാളം • ‎norsk bokmål • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎Tagalog • ‎Türkçe • ‎українська • ‎中文


Commons deletion (policy)

此页面阐述有关维基共享资源上的快速删除方针,以及如何请求或处理快速删除。 此页面不包含任何版权或授权问题;此类问题请参见Commons:Licensing

The criteria for speedy deletion specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus support to, at their discretion, bypass deletion discussions and immediately delete files or pages, which does not mean that administrators are compelled to delete it if there are circumstances that provide for a simple better solution. They cover only the cases specified in the rules below.

Administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases. If a page has survived a prior deletion discussion, it should not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations. Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation. There is strong consensus that the creators and major contributors of pages and files should be warned of a speedy deletion nomination; if you tagged any content for speedy deletion, be sure to notify its creator.



1. 測試頁、意外建立、或頁面包含無意義或無效內容
Page contains redundant content that was previously used for testing, or was accidentally created, or contains content that is gibberish or of nothing meaningful. This may also include empty categories, and text placed in talkpages (which has no further history) that doesn't help or refer to the related page.
2. 無用、不合理或毀損的重定向
Page is an unused and implausible redirect, or a redirect that is dependent on deleted or non-existent content. Unused talkpage redirects created as a result of a page move and cross-namespace redirects may also be deleted under this criterion.
3. 意圖進行破壞、威脅或攻擊的內容
Content that is posted with the intention of causing damage, or with the intention of threatening, harassing, or attacking another person or user. Users that commit such acts are subjected to their accounts being temporarily or permanently blocked, depending on the severity of the content. Content posted with the intention of creating/spreading hoaxes may also be deleted under this criterion.
4. 之前根據社群共識刪除後又重新建立的內容
Page or file matches content that was previously deleted per community consensus. Repeated recreation of such content may lead to the user's account being blocked. The author or uploader may ask the deleting administrator to restore the file, or file an Undeletion Request.
5. 為了清理歷史或隱藏版本的臨時刪除
Content temporarily deleted to remove specific revisions containing vandalism, threats/attacks, or personal information. Content may also be temporarily deleted to perform a history merge or split.
6. 無爭議的維護
Content temporarily deleted to make way for a page move, or other uncontroversial maintenance tasks that require temporary or permanent deletion.
7. 作者或上傳者請求刪除
Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content. For author/uploader requests for deletion of content that is older[1] a deletion request should be filled instead.
8. 依賴於已刪除或不存在內容的頁面
The page or file depends on content that was deleted or no longer existing, such as orphaned talkpages without useful content, redirects to invalid targets, subpages without parent page, and so on. The criterion only applies to content within Wikimedia, and does not apply to external content (i.e. deleted source).
9. 基金会行动。
Criterion reserved for office actions. The Wikimedia Foundation office reserves the right to speedily delete content temporarily or permanently in cases of exceptional circumstances. 没有管理员可以依此删除内容,除非他自己就是维基媒体基金会的官方职员。此类删除亦不应该在未获基金会授权的情况下恢复。



1. 沒有圖片或其他媒體文件的圖庫
Mainspace pages (galleries) that are empty or contain no useful content, such as pages that contain text but no images or other media.
2. 錯誤建立的圖庫
User intended to create a category, userpage, or other page, but a typo or misplaced character(s) in the prefix prevented the content from being the intended type. In particular, note that the prefix must be in English.
3. 用戶預計建立百科全書的內容
Page intended to be an encyclopedic article. Articles and biographies belong to the Wikipedia projects, and are out of Commons's project scope.
4. 宣傳內容或垃圾訊息
Mainspace content is of no apparent use or value, and largely contains spam, or is intended to promote a business, person, or other entity. Such content is out of the project scope.


1. 被重命名的或重复的分类。
Categories that are renamed, or those that duplicate an existing, may be redirected to the new category, or deleted. See Rename a category#Should the old category be deleted?
2. 命名不当的分类。
Improperly named categories, or categories that violate the basic naming conventions, may be speedily deleted. See Rename a category#Should the old category be deleted?

Note: Criterion G1 is applicable for empty categories.


1. Improperly filled or routinely emptied deletion request or log
This includes Deletion Requests (DRs) that are corrupted or incorrect and cannot be fixed. Or redundant DRs for pages that are eligible for speedy deletion; this requires either formally closing the DR in order to both close the DR and have the bot remove it from the log, or deleting the DR page and removing the daily log entry. Deletion logs are also routinely emptied as discussions are closed, when empty they may be deleted immediately. Note that this does not apply to DR archives, which are separate from the working logs.


1. 明顯侵犯版權
Content is apparently a copyright violation, with no good evidence of Commons-compatible licensing being issued by the copyright holder or status as a free work. Repeated uploading of non-free material may lead to the uploading user's account being temporarily or permanently blocked.
2. 合理使用内容。
3. 非自由版权内容的衍生作品。
Derivative works based on non-free content (such as screenshots of non-free content). 这并不包括自由的全景使用权(FoP)的情况。
4. 未通过的授权验证。
License review concluded that the recently uploaded content is based on a non-free license, disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works. Files tagged by OTRS Reviewers as having insufficient permission, or files tagged with OTRS pending for over 30 days, may also be speedily deleted under this criterion.
5. 缺少必要資訊
The file is missing essential information, such as a license, permission, or source. Such content may be given a grace period of seven days (since tagging) before being deleted.
6. 洗授權
Content uploaded via license laundering techniques is a copyright violation. Users uploading in such techniques may be subjected to their account being temporarily or permanently blocked.
7. 空的文件。
The file-namespace is empty. Empty file-pages are subjected to uncontroversial speedy deletion, unless they are being used as redirects.
8. 完全相同或縮小的副本
The file is an exact or scaled-down duplicate of an older existing file. The generally accepted rule is to delete the newer duplicate, but that may not always be the case, such as when comparing between a user uploaded file, and a bot uploaded file. Note that for very large files, it may be acceptable to have a scaled-down duplicate for accessibility reasons.
9. Embedded data
The file contains additional embedded data in the form of a password protected archive.


1. 重复的模板。
2. 未使用的模板。


1. 用户请求删除自己的用户页。
2. 不存在的用户的用户页。
3. 不恰當地使用用戶頁
Inappropriate use of user pages. These include user pages that contain purely advertising or promotional material, or those that are created with the intention of harassment or attack. Those that contain gibberish or unrecognisable content may also be deleted under this criterion.


  1. Older content (>7 days) may be used by external websites and would thus not show up in Special:GlobalUsage.