Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arara Azul no Pantanal.jpg

File:Arara Azul no Pantanal.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2017 at 17:26:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Arara Azul no Pantanal.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arara Azul no Pantanal.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
•  Info created and uploaded by Leonardo Ramos - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:26, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:26, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support New category: macro-bird-photography! (Focal plane seems to be a bit closer than the eyes but because of that most of the body feathers are in perfect focus and show wonderful detail so it's not a prob I think.) -- KennyOMG (talk) 18:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daphne Lantier 19:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 20:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very good, but please fix the categories, unless I'm mistaken, this is a photo of a bird not a park. --cart-Talk 20:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment There is a kind of halo along the left border of the wing on the right side --Llez (talk) 20:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:47, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- PumpkinSky talk 22:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Conditional support per fixing halo noted by Llez. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose, this has not been done in six days. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Ditto to what Daniel said above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Weak support that would become full support if the image is lighten up, it's a bit too dark. Poco² 12:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 20:49, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 23:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Cute! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:11, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 11:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Regretfully since it is a great photo. But it has been saved with ProPhotoRGB colourspace, which is totally unsuitable for JPG or internet use (see User:Colin/BrowserTest for why the majority of our users -- mobile -- will see extremely bad colours). The halo noted seems I guess to be a crudely applied mask perhaps to reduce sharpening-noise or to apply NR or increase exposure, and which is overlapping the edge. I think we would expect our regulars to do that more carefully. -- Colin (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

• User:LeonardoRamos, could you possibly convert the colorspace to a more web-friendly one? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:31, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

• User:Colin Just changed the colour space to sRGB. There is no mask applied to this photo, let alone crudely done. I believe the halo you refer to is the way the leaves are arranged in the background, or the vignette created by the lens. Either way, I like it. -- LeonardoRamos.

• User:Colin It took me almost 2 years, but I finally realised what you mean by "halo". It's called a shadow. Look it up. It's quite common to see shadows underneath objects that block sunlight, like a bird's wing. Thanks for the support though.

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Daphne Lantier 22:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds