Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:17-12-14-Flughafen-Madrid-Barajas-RalfR-DSCF1008.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:17-12-14-Flughafen-Madrid-Barajas-RalfR-DSCF1008.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2018 at 20:29:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info Flughafen Madrid-Barajas, Eingangsbereich, links die Sicherheitskontrolle, all by -- Ralf Roleček 20:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Ralf Roleček 20:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)- Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- PumpkinSky talk 00:06, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 06:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I actually like it which it why I took the pain to open it fullscreen... and it's not symmetrical. I think those shots should be. - Benh (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC)- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 00:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:11, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:24, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Benh, suggested crop see note --A.Savin 12:51, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Die Säulen sind nicht symmetrisch, siehe hier. --Ralf Roleček 20:17, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support It think this photo doesn't have to be symmetric. The original crop is perfect for me. — Draceane talkcontrib. 21:58, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose compo, like captured in the middle of nowhere.--Mile (talk) 08:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Moderate support One would wish for pure symmetry, but it isn't in the original. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: Not quite sure what you mean, but File:Barajas_Airport_(Madrid)_(4684560779).jpg is much more acceptable from a "symmetry" point of view, so why not here? Here the assymetry can be noticed even on the thumbnail (Now that I know about it in my case) and I'm fairly sure it wouldn't have taken a big effort to leave the annoying right pilar out of the frame. If people like it non-symetric though, I guess there's no arguing. - Benh (talk) 21:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- The supports are NOT symmetrical in this case, see here. --Ralf Roleček 21:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- If u r right, then there was a least a way to render them "more" symmetrical as I've shown File:Barajas_Airport_(Madrid)_(4684560779).jpg. - Benh (talk) 21:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Right, there is the posibility from other points. But my photo show no symmetric supports. Symmetry is not a criterion to FP. But i knew, symmetric photos are very popular here. --Ralf Roleček 22:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- The supports are NOT symmetrical in this case, see here. --Ralf Roleček 21:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
_(4684560779).jpg){kind=link}
- Oppose Per Benh. I looked at other photos. There is symmetry here but not in this photo, which is a mistake and quite a big one. The claim "Symmetry is not a criterion to FP" is simply nonsense. The FP criteria are not defined or limited to some handful of agreed-upon features. While the building is amazing enough this image will likely pass, I am also confident that practically anyone else with a DSLR could improve on it by simply taking more care where to stand and how to point their camera. -- Colin (talk) 15:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors
