Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ARD-Hauptstadtstudio, Berlin-Mitte, Fassade, 170117, ako.jpg

File:ARD-Hauptstadtstudio, Berlin-Mitte, Fassade, 170117, ako.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2017 at 06:52:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:ARD-Hauptstadtstudio, Berlin-Mitte, Fassade, 170117, ako.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ARD-Hauptstadtstudio, Berlin-Mitte, Fassade, 170117, ako.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info Facade of ARD-Hauptstadtstudio in Berlin-Mitte. ARD-Hauptstadtstudio is a television studio in Berlin operated jointly by the members of the federal broadcasting network ARD. All by me -- Code (talk) 06:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Code (talk) 06:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:17, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:10, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm bothered by the slight curvature of the lines. Otherwise great shot. – Lucas 17:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

• @Lucasbosch: Really? That's interesting. I thought on the contrary that the curvature was compositionally lifting the picture above FP treshold. --Code (talk) 17:49, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

• @Code: I see what you mean, but IMO unless the actual building is curved, the image should either have drastically curved lines for effect or have perfectly straight lines. I'll see what others say about it. – Lucas 18:05, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

• @Lucasbosch: Ehm... the buliding actually is curved. --Code (talk) 18:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

• @Code: thanks, I wasn't aware of that. – Lucas 18:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I'm a big fan of repeating patterns and simplicity and you have a great eye for both. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per above discussion, the curved lines are there for a reason. – Lucas 18:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 20:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 21:50, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Great colors; the geometric forms in this picture look so perfect. The blue reminds me of this picture posted a few days ago. WClarke (talk) 01:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral makes no wow --Miha (talk) 09:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:30, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral Agree with Miha. We have better compos for this kind of shots Poco² 09:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - I agree with Miha and Poco, but since no-one has the courage or conviction to oppose, I won't stand in front of this racing locomotive, either. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I'm not here to judge your choice of subject. -- Thennicke (talk) 07:44, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture