Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Body-bones3.png

File:Body-bones3.png

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2011 at 00:09:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Body-bones3.png Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Body-bones3.png

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by Niabot -- Niabot (talk) 00:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Niabot (talk) 00:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Interesting, high educational value. I would like to have more information about the accuracy before voting: did you use a model? which one? male or female? Thanks, Yann (talk) 06:38, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's basing on an older 3D-Scan (several layers) from Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg with different aspect ratio for each axis. I used this relatively low resolution images to adjust the bones that where modeled by hand. The outer surface is from MakeHuman and the bones got stretched/rotated to match the model. --Niabot (talk) 08:30, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the info. Could you include that in the description? Yann (talk) 12:54, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Snaevar (talk) 12:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination The skeleton has some issues as a discussion at german wikipedia revealed. I will fix the problems and replace it with a corrected version. Until then the nomination should be stopped. --Niabot (talk) 14:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment The bones are stylised. The clavicle should clearly articulate with the sternum. It is not clear which is rib cartilage and which is rib bone. There should be more ankle and foot bones. The intervertibral discs are not represented properly. Not in the anatomical position. If used for educational purposes, it would need properly shaped bones. Snowmanradio (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)