Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Collegiata dei Santi Nazaro e Celso sagrestia trittico Brescia.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Collegiata dei Santi Nazaro e Celso sagrestia trittico Brescia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2019 at 21:30:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tryptyc by Paolo da Caylina il Vecchio in the Santi Nazaro e Celso church in Brescia.
  •  Comment - No-one said it should be easy to shoot an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment Of course you are right, and I absolutely did not want to criticize you, I just wanted to say that I (personally) feel that this image is excellent, even when it would be even better without the reflection. But because my comment is cryptic, I have crossed it out (but still support the image). --Aristeas (talk) 13:24, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose For me, glare in such a static object in a public place like a church is not acceptable in an FP, especially since it can be avoided by something as simple as a polarizing filter or wait for the sun to move a bit and make a combo of two or three photos (it is after all a triptych, so easy to do in sections) to get the whole piece evenly lit. --Cart (talk) 21:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the info, I stand corrected on that point and I meant no disrespect. But surely a polarizing filter could be used even in a non-public place. Given that you have such a fantastic camera (I am really envious of it!), investing in some filters could be worth doing. I always keep some in my camera bag even if I seldom use them, they are handy to have at times. I have the same opinion as three users before me, yet I'm the one you chose to come down on. --Cart (talk) 19:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @W.carter: I don't feel disrespect but IMO your comment was a bit, let's say "superficial" or hasty? That's the reason I "came down on you". You probably are not aware how difficult, well it is actually forbidden (I read the conditions to take pictures in the churches of Brescia and they made me feel a criminal) to take high resolution pictures inside the churches in Brescia and publish them on the Internet, for any reason, without written permission. I have a polarising filter, which was sold to me as one of the best (Hoya), and which takes away 2 aperture stops that are gold in such difficult conditions. The filter does'nt make miracles. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, let there be peace. I have striked my vote and my comment. You are happy when I make superficial comments and fight for your photos but not when I oppose in the same way. Lesson learned. --Cart (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity