Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Externsteine High Resolution v2 2015.jpg

File:Externsteine High Resolution v2 2015.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2015 at 19:37:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Externsteine High Resolution v2 2015.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Externsteine High Resolution v2 2015.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info High resolution photo (211 Mpx) of the famous German stone formation Externsteine
  all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support WOW! Absolutely impressive. Light and composition couldn't be better and the quality is perfect. And I think I should visit this place soon. --Code (talk) 20:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--LivioAndronico talk 22:13, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing! Very clear image. --Laitche (talk) 08:45, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I am amazed too. By its unnecessary size of merely 100 MB and fact i cant open it. So, what is benefit of stone in 1:10 or 10:1 ? If effect is wow, he bring me to faces of visitors then i would oppose. --Mile (talk) 12:58, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Mile, why are you complaining at FP about the problems with your PC. Sadly Commons zoom viewer seems broken more often that it works but I'd recommend that for large photos viewed in a browser. Obviously such a photo must work as an image at screen-resolution. But it also works as source-media for exploring the rock formation in detail or for allowing multiple crop opportunities. So it has high EV due to its great resolution. If you have problems viewing such an image, complain on the Village Pump that the zoom viewer is broken, or that Commons has had it's "thumbnailer" (the software that downsizes images for view) crippled so it can't create large downsized versions. -- Colin (talk) 14:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 13:07, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:44, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support and I won't even ask you to focus-stack the bench. :) — Julian H.^✈ 13:56, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing detail. It is a good photo in screen size but there is also much to explore in detail. -- Colin (talk) 14:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Wow. --XRay ^talk 15:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 16:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:50, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer 09:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 10:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Cultic. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:23, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:39, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural