Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Húsavík (8).jpg

File:Húsavík (8).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2011 at 14:59:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Húsavík (8).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Húsavík (8).jpg

9

1123

242

156

3872

2592

chromatic aberrations --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

3379

1823

225

302

3872

2592

chromatic aberrations --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

•  Info created by Chmee2 - uploaded by Chmee2 - nominated by Chmee2 -- Chmee2 (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Chmee2 (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose technical reasons: the clouds have only little structure and you see only white mud, further the building in the middle have strong chromatic aberation, the landscape is for sure amazing, but the composition is ordinary, nearly boring --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment To Wladyslaw. I'm desagree, perhaps with all, but ¿can you say with a note where are the chromatic aberrations?, thanks--Miguel Bugallo 19:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

revenge for [1]? --Tlusťa (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

(Poor english) I don't know. Persecution? I'm not sure. Perhaps if the user does not respond with criterion… must have administrators who punished. This is a precedent, unless Wladyslaw respond with criteria. Sorry, I am not nobody--Miguel Bugallo 21:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately not a precedent, Taxiarchos228/Wladyslaw, has already been blocked on two other Wikimedia projects. --ELEKHH^T 03:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

would be interesting to know what the (unjustified) blockades have to do with my opinion concerning this candidate. I was interessted why Chmee2 critizes facts but his own pictures not approach the criteria. it's a pity that Chmee2 nominates a poor quality picture I critiszed instead of anwsering my questions. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm glad that Tlusťa gave here link to my review. Everybody can easily see in other edits, if I answered your questions or not why yours two images are not good candidates for QI. However thank you for your vote here, but I nominated this image regardless your comments on QI page. Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 10:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Sure. What an amazing coincidence that I mentioned this picture 15 Minutes before you nomineted it. --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

I do not deny, that I realized via your link, than I do not yet try to nominate this shot from Iceland. However this was not main message from my previous comment. --Chmee2 (talk) 10:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support --Tlusťa (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral I really like the atmosphere and the colors, but I've to agree with Taxiarchos and the image is unsharp/soft and thus the details are low. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Weak support Agree with kaʁstn, but I think that I agree with Tlusťa and there are things more important than the image, and than one image--Miguel Bugallo 21:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks kaʁstn. You can see chromatic aberrations, but the chromatic aberrations of User:Taxiarchos228 or Wladyslaw must be seen in (or "on") the building: "further the building in the middle have strong chromatic aberation". I wait for comprehensible answer: It is possible, in spite of everything.--Miguel Bugallo 23:17, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, kaʁstn. ¿What are you doing? ¿Are you trying to say that the world is good? To me, your notes are ridiculous--Miguel Bugallo 23:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    • We must hope to Wladyslaw. He can opine--Miguel Bugallo 23:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --SHION (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

• account is too young --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose Bad aerial perspective and lacking sharpness.--Snaevar (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Weak support Per kaʁstn and Miguel Bugallo. --TFCforever (talk) 05:04, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Vypadá to docela pěkně (barvy), ale křiví se tam horizont a působí to na mě trochu neostrý dojmem. --Aktron (talk) 14:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Jujutacular ^talk 01:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)