Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Miniopterus manavi.jpg/2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

File:Miniopterus manavi.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2013 at 08:54:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Digital illustration based on a previous pencil drawing. Created with expert supervision. Illustration of the bat Miniopterus manavi showing its features and morphology. Useful for infoboxes in Wikipedias.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Edgarsh422 - uploaded by Edgarsh422 - nominated by Dvdgmz -- Dvdgmz (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good scientific illustration, showing the features and morphology of the animal. Good integration of general and detail views. Resolution 3,2Mpx. Usefull for Wikipedia and Wikispecies -- Dvdgmz (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This image was previously nominated but denied because I had other nominations active, after that nominations are closed I can nominate this again.--Dvdgmz (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Is a naturalistic illustration that breaks a little the stereotype, although this, it gives us all the information needed for this type of work. As author --Edgarsh422 (talk) 11:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, rather small and too much "artistic" design for my taste. I would prefer the more scientific drawing --mathias K 18:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is not small, is 1,2Mpx over minimum of 2Mpx. --Dvdgmz (talk) 11:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The engravings of Ernst Haeckel from 1904 are good contributions to naturalism, but it's not the only style for scientific illustrations. I think that the Edgarsh422 drawing shows well the features of the animal for an encyclopedia. --Dvdgmz (talk) 11:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'd rather be educated by a creative work like this. That other drawing suits en:FP not Commons FPC. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per nominator. Leptictidium (talk) 17:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per nominator. --Ivan bea (talk) 14:03, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per mathias. Kaldari (talk) 07:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per mathias. RichardKongrosian (talk) 07:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per nominator.--KRLS (talk) 12:12, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Mathias--Jebulon (talk) 13:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Mathias. --Citron (talk) 18:01, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Mathias.  ■ MMXX talk 15:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please, if you can spend a little time to argue the author will have feedback and we will have best orientations to promote this kind of contributions. Thanks.--Dvdgmz (talk) 21:04, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep Talk 13:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)