Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2013 at 12:22:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Paris - Sacré-Cœur - Kuppel zur blauen Stunde.jpg/2Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paris - Sacré-Cœur - Kuppel zur blauen Stunde.jpg/2
all by Wladyslaw. Image was already nominated here and was well accepted, but sadly there was to less voters. As I think this image is worth to be FP I start a renomination. -- Wladyslaw (talk) 12:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
I don't like the overlapping-dome composition. There are better composition arrangements in Category:Dome of Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre. The building to the front-right looks good and natural, but the rear dome and the building to the front left have too much local contrast. This might be unfortunate lighting but might also be overprocessing. Either way, the rear dome is blown in places so there is no detail to the brickwork. The contrast between the blown yellow-lit brickwork and the saturated blue sky makes the picture look less real. The top of the dome is blurred, though I appreciate it is quite some way away -- I can't comment on whether the aperture could have been smaller as there's no EXIF data. Which is another issue: the file has no colour profile defined or embedded, so may appear different colours on everyone's PC or mac. I think an FP should have professional standards here, and so expect an sRGB profile for web usage. Any quality program designed for editing photographs should be able to save JPGs properly with a suitable profile. -- Colin (talk) 18:05, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
bad cut penalize the compositions, the subject is not very exciting, is something already seen in many other parts of the world. bad depth --Pava (talk) 12:27, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results: Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /JoydeepTalk 12:44, 28 October 2013 (UTC)