Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phoenicopterus roseus portrait.jpg

File:Phoenicopterus roseus portrait.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2014 at 17:04:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Phoenicopterus roseus portrait.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phoenicopterus roseus portrait.jpg

•  Info Up close and personal with a Greater Flamingo, Phoenicopterus roses, at Martin Mere, Lancashire, UK. All by -- Baresi F (talk) 17:04, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Baresi F (talk) 17:04, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 18:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice --Alexander Vasenin (talk) 04:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral technically flawless and very good composition! It's only that I'm not really that wow-ed this time... the bird's a bit dull, i.e whiteish, simply lacking striking colors that I would expect here. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:32, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks @Martin Falbisoner - a fair comment regarding the colour. I've added a little saturation, and adjusted the exposure slightly to make it less washed-out - do you think it looks any better? --Baresi F (talk) 16:13, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

yes, it does look better now. The bird's still not my all-time favorite, but the image is good enough to  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

•  Support I never fail to enjoy your work @Baresi franco. --Graphium 10:07, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

 Neutral Very tight crop --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:40, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

•  Support tight, but impressive -- Wolf im Wald 08:45, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Being high resolution and showing detail is not enough for reaching the star. For me the composition is poor and the crop too tight. By the way, the top of the head is overexposed in the red channel and no significant detail is shown. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tight crop --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:17, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Support per "Wolf im Wald". --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose see C. Ferrer and Alvesgaspar above. --Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 11:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tight crop, poor composition Gidip (talk) 18:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Question Isn't it tilted ? (See the droplet...)--Jebulon (talk) 10:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 21:27, 24 May 2014 (UTC)