Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo December 2009-12a.jpg (2)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

File:Porto Covo December 2009-12a.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2011 at 16:30:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tempest in Porto Covo
  • Pictogram voting info.svg  Info Second try for one of my favourite pictures. First nom here. Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:30, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:30, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg  Comment very poetic, minimal and has a nice form (the absent of the colors make it looking like a b&w image - and I like that) - but this image has low EV IMO. Ggia (talk) 17:44, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose the composition is feature-worthy, yet the lacking crisp sharpness and missing metadata make me oppose. did you perform any digital enhancement? regards, PETER WEIS TALK 22:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg  Info -- The Exif file was eliminated by the noise-removing application (Neat Image). I have included in the image file the exposure information I was able to recover. Sharpness and contrast were enhanced as the original was extremly soft due to lack of light and haze/spray in the air (a storm was going on). Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose Good visualization of a storm. I like the composition, and the large swells apparent in the background. I think that maybe your noise reduction tool has done more harm than good in this case. Patches of the rocks looks odd or overprocessed. Maybe it would have been better or at least more true or "raw" with all the haze. --Slaunger (talk) 23:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg  Question Hmmm it is beautiful and very poetic indeed, but with such uninteresting light and color conditions I would go B&W. Is the vignetting not corrected on purpose? --Paolo Costa (talk) 01:20, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg  Support I like this seascape. It shows the darkness by the sky on the stormy day and the liveliness by the sea on the stormy day. The water is not only gray or even white, it has also colours like orange and a greeny-gray. This orange is also on the top of the landscape. A black-and-white-image would miss this colouring. The sea is powerful with large breakers. I don't miss a full sharpness. The image is coherent and (like Ggia said) very poetic and minimal. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:29, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg  Oppose lacks any wow, very dull photograph that fails convey the subject, I do note the colour aspets as interesting but they dont hold either a significant position(see rule of thirds) or visual proportion. Also nothing has changed since the previous nomination 10 months ago. Gnangarra 12:01, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)