Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skyline Frankfurt am Main 2015.jpg

File:Skyline Frankfurt am Main 2015.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2016 at 16:16:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Skyline Frankfurt am Main 2015.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skyline Frankfurt am Main 2015.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info created and uploaded by Dr. Chriss - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support More Christian Wolf. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support We already have lots of Frankfurt skylines but this one has the highest resolution except for File:Frankfurt Am Main-Stadtpanorama von der Ignatz-Bubis-Bruecke am Mittag-20100424.jpg, whose view is not as good as this one. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 19:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pierre André (talk) 21:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry and no offense to the author, but do you honestly believe that this is FP? The resolution might be high, but the light is of a harsh summer day kind and comes from the wrong direction and imho does not do justice to the skyscrapers. I think that a good FP of this view must be taken either in the morning or at night., ideally with the same technical quality. --DXR (talk) 09:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm fine with the light. Just a difference of taste, I think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support as photographer, and thank you for the nomination Arion. --Dr. Chriss (talk) 15:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per DXR basically. The lighting is too harsh--Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support It may have been processed more than one would like in order to get this level of detail with the strong light available, but again that's a tradeoff I can except (Is there some sort of pedestrian walkway along the railroad bridge from which this was taken? It looks like it from Google Maps). Daniel Case (talk) 01:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

The Bridge is for trains and on the side, there is a walkway only for pedastrians. U can have a look at the location when u click in the discription page on the coordinates. Regards --Dr. Chriss (talk) 12:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes