Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Fly May 2008-6.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Fly May 2008-6.jpg - not featured[edit]

Short description

  •  Info A simple fly, in the style of our talented photographer... well, you know who. This is a female flesh-fly, probably a Sarcophaga sp. (the females of these family are not normally identifiable from a photograph). Notice the hairy arista (the bristle-like branches of the antennae), the long legs and the red eyes. Created & nominated by Alvesgaspar 19:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Alvesgaspar 19:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment maybe you could identify this one of mine that's been in the unidentified category for a year or so :) Mfield 20:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral It's wonderfully composed, but it seems to lack sharpness required for this type of shot. Maybe because it was shot at f/16? -- Ram-Man 02:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Support I strongly disagree that focus bracketing should be required. My only concern was that in my eyes it didn't look the proper sharpness at my 2MP viewing standard. Diffraction should be invisible at that magnification, but perhaps it was over-sharpened or just blurry to start with? In any case, I stared at it for a while and realized that it looks fine at normal viewing distances and magnifications. Borderline for me, but on the right side. -- Ram-Man 22:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment f/16 causes diffraction blur. Focus bracketing can be a solution --Richard Bartz 18:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Ordinary subject, nothing special, no wow. On a positive note, it is quite well done technically. Unfortunately, aesthetically and compositionally it is not that much above average. Crapload 05:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
2 support, 1 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 21:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]