Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Istanbul (by CherryX).jpg

Image:Istanbul (by CherryX).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2011 at 08:25:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:Istanbul (by CherryX).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Istanbul (by CherryX).jpg

•  Info created by CherryX - uploaded by CherryX - nominated by CherryX -- CherryX (talk) 08:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- CherryX (talk) 08:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Low quality. Galandil (talk) 13:32, 4 August

2011 (UTC)

• •  Comment Galandil, the support model comes automatically when you upload a picture! You'll notice that it's almost always the case with the other featured pictures candidates! This is not a correct way to judge a picture ! Please remove your vote or find better arguments. Same thing for your votes on other pictures... -Gzzz (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks Galandil. -Gzzz (talk) 20:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
    • As Gzzz. This reason is not valid. Please delete your vote. Tomer T (talk) 19:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Please improve the file's description page. It isn't clear, for example, in what year it was taken. Tomer T (talk) 19:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose low quality, low resolution and imho bw pictures are not appropriate for a encyclopedia if they are not historical --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:27, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Berthold Werner + unsharp, + missing EXIF (when was is taken, and wehere: missing GEO-tag. And why, why, why a BW photo??? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:16, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)