Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

File:Flatirons Winter Sunrise edit 2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2010 at 13:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Flatirons rock formations, near Boulder, Colorado.


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural

File:Fresco of Apollo.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2010 at 19:52:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fresco of Apollo.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Cody escadron delta -- Cody escadron delta (talk) 19:52, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cody escadron delta (talk) 19:52, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice picture, but ISO 720 is IMO too high. You need to use a tripod if there is not enough light. Also the size is a bit small for a work of art. Yann (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
I hadn't got a tripod at the moment. Cody escadron delta (talk) 08:00, 28 August 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Hyla intermedia Oleron.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2010 at 15:05:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hyla intermedium in repose on a varnished wooden shutter.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Cpas-91 - uploaded by Caps-91 - nominated by Caps-91 -- Caps-91 (talk) 15:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Caps-91 (talk) 15:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nice, but way too low dof. --mathias K 16:59, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose DOF too low, unappealing flash lighting. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to THFSW - MPF (talk) 12:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:10, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Women in tribal village, Umaria district, India.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2010 at 13:26:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Women in tribal village, Umaria district, India.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Yann (talk) 13:26, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 13:26, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fajardoalacant (talk) 15:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support We have too few portraits in FP, methinks. This is a good one. Steven Walling 16:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - limited depth of focus, lack of 'wow' factor - MPF (talk) 16:11, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
    • Very few people visit this village, and it is quite difficult to take pictures of women, as they do not have much public activities. Yann (talk) 14:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's an portrait, of course there is just a little dof! And thats good! The composition is also very nice. The only point of critique is that disturbing rest of another robe in the corner down left. But per Steven: We have too few portraits in FP, and this is a good one! --mathias K 17:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Indeed beautiful facial expression, but the top crop (head of woman in the background looking into the camera) is too tight, and the things going on in the left bottom corner are ambiguous.--Elekhh (talk) 23:17, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per MPF. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 17:30, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik (my contribs) 10:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice portrait photographed in the country we have not nearly enough FP images from.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the use of the colors and the curved shapes around the women's faces, the equilibrium of the whole, the facial expressions completing each other. --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:28, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great pic!
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Takabeg (talk) 12:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: People

File:20100726 Kalamitsi Beach Ionian Sea Lefkada island Greece.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2010 at 13:11:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kalamitsi beach, Lefkada Island, Ionian Sea, Greece.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ggia (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Υπέρ I still believe that Greece is the most beautiful country in the world. --патриот8790Say whatever you want 17:14, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The sky is very noisy IMO.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:49, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A polarizer filter has been used and the sky was darker.. during a mask, giving more light to the sky the noise appeared. I find minor reason to vote oppose.. this is a little noise and minor thing comparing to the overall quality which is high. Ggia (talk) 09:02, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, but there is not only a little noise. This pic for example has a assimilable situation in the sky and nearly no noise. --mathias K 09:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice colors but sky noise spoil it. --Mile (talk) 10:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm afrid mathias is right. The wave crashes are very intrusive here. --Korman (talk) 05:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Not bad, but too, too noisy. Trance Light (talk) 21:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment for the most annoying thing in this photograph is the barrel distortion that you can observe in the horizon (between sea-sky). but this distortion can be corrected. Ggia (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Ggia (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

File:SNCB Class20 R04.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2010 at 20:57:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Belgian Class 20 locomotive
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by MJJR - uploaded by MJJR - nominated by MJJR -- MJJR (talk) 20:57, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MJJR (talk) 20:57, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think some perspective correction might be needed. Besides, there's too much empty space. Wolf (talk) 20:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
    • I don't see the need for perspective correction: all the vertical lines are properly vertical. The amount of 'empty space' is a matter of taste... -- MJJR (talk) 21:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral It is very good and illustrative. However I miss a bit of wow factor. There are several minor issues: I'd have preferred a 3:2 version with less soil and sky. Then there is that building in the background that is a bit disturbing. And the cut off train. --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Airbus Wing 01798.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2010 at 05:33:43 (UTC)

Alternative version by User:Carschten

Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Airbus wing


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Beloeil castel 1 Luc Viatour.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2010 at 12:28:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Beloeil caste (Belgium)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by -- Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by -- Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 12:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 12:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose change vote, see below really, really sorry about that oppose cause the picture is really nice. The Nikon D3S is a great camera and it is hard to believe that this picture is shot with F2.8 and ISO 3600. But why? Doesn't packed your tripod? This could be such an amazing picture but sadly the noise is visible, pretty less for iso3600, but visible. The sharpness over the whole scene could be better and the oe areas on the right side of the building are also not so nice. I really like the colors and the composition with the mirror effect but the technical problems make me oppose. Sorry, mathias K 14:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
A tripod in the water that does not work well ;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 05:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Face-smile.svg Yes thats true! I thought something like that cause of the very short focal length used on a full frame camera. Wasn't it possible to take the picture from the shore? I've checked the location on Google Earth and it looks like it would be possible, but I don't know the real situation there... bg mathias K 16:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral thinking about it again and I think it is too good for oppose. The situation (taking the pic from a boat) is really hard and the reasult is pretty good! Greetings mathias K 10:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I do not see much noise here. --King of Hearts (talk) 07:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A great shot indeed. I do not see any notable noise here. --Cayambe (talk) 08:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overexposed, noise, colors. --Mile (talk) 11:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good picture Cody escadron delta (talk) 14:09, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to Mile - MPF (talk) 16:06, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I see little noise, and the colours are great. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 20:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Brackenheim (talk) 02:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Noise? What noise? –Juliancolton | Talk 03:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support beautifull picture, i don't see any noise --Croucrou (talk) 11:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Superb Rastrojo (DES) 14:53, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik (my contribs) 10:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Original and rare view. Very good to me.--Jebulon (talk) 10:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Noise levels are fine. I like the blue light. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Taj Mahal, Agra, India.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2010 at 14:47:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

Taj Mahal, Agra, India.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Yann (talk) 14:47, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 14:47, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment just a reminder of the two active nominations rule, currently you have three. --Elekhh (talk) 01:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit[edit]

Edited version.
  • I removed four black spots (birds? dust spots?) in the sky, made the white balance cooler, lightened, and increased the saturation. See what you guys think. -- King of Hearts (talk) 20:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks too saturated to me. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is the best version in my opinion. --99of9 (talk) 12:42, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks to King of Hearts for his help. Yann (talk) 13:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mbz1 (talk) 15:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --George Chernilevsky talk 20:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Doesn't look over-saturated to me. Steven Walling 22:10, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cody escadron delta (talk) 07:53, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit2[edit]

Edited version.
  • Same as edit1, but saturation kept the same as original. -- King of Hearts (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks to King of Hearts for his help. Yann (talk) 13:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mbz1 (talk) 15:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This version is the best. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like all versions --George Chernilevsky talk 20:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Steven Walling 22:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cody escadron delta (talk) 07:53, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The best of the series IMO. --Cayambe (talk) 17:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This one. The sky could use some de-noising, though. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Takabeg (talk) 12:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is probably the best version - great image. Hekerui (talk) 22:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture
The chosen alternative is: File:Taj_Mahal,_Agra,_India_edit2.jpg

File:Hydrolagus alberti.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2010 at 12:22:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by [1] - uploaded by Citron - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 12:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Citron (talk) 12:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Is it correct that the fish was shot from the bottom? Strange position … Not entirely sharp, imho. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
See this drawing, the fish isn't shot from the bottom. Yes not entirely sharp, but very high quality compensates? --Citron (talk) 20:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Well, excuse my English please. Of course not directly from the bottom but obliquely from below. You can see more parts of the bottom than of the top. The scheme is a clear cross section while the photo is not. Its quality is okay but all in all I think that the fish could have been better photographed. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:33, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - scan from slide with the inevitable spots and scratches. Also shows a dead, stuffed specimen, not even in a very life-like pose. - MPF (talk) 21:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg Citron (talk) 12:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Giant's Causeway (14).JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2010 at 15:59:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Giant's Causeway, Northern Ireland. Hexagonal basalts.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Chmee2 - uploaded by Chmee2 - nominated by Chmee2 -- Chmee2 (talk) 15:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Chmee2 (talk) 15:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:23, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition and the light despite some possible issues (is the horizon really horizontal?) I inserted it in the fr:WP article when I saw it posted on QIC page some weeks ago :-) --Myrabella (talk) 20:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:16, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cody escadron delta (talk) 17:12, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Mbz1 (talk) 21:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support really nice, I love this place! --mathias K 09:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 07:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Avala (talk) 12:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural

File:Hermetia illucens Black soldier fly edit1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2010 at 07:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Serengeti Topi3.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2010 at 17:31:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Topi antelope in Serengeti, portrait format
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created - uploaded - nominated by Ikiwaner (talk) 17:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikiwaner (talk) 17:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting motion shot. -- King of Hearts (talk) 20:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Wrong framing, the poor thing looks caged. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:51, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The quality could have been better, but the image has "wow". Wrong framing? Well, maybe, but one could feel the speed, no caged animal could run with such speed --Mbz1 (talk) 15:30, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as per Mbz1. Yann (talk) 15:36, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
    • Support the other version. Yann (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Alves. --mathias K 17:03, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The usual motion shot problems of blurring/focus, plus I dislike the portrait framing. Landscape would give a better sense of movement. Steven Walling 17:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Alves and Steven. --Elekhh (talk) 20:54, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cody escadron delta (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment To me it's the portrait framing that sets this image apart from classic compositions. You get a good view of the animal but also of the surrounding habitat. But if you prefer a landscape version here you go. --Ikiwaner (talk) 10:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - definitely prefer the landscape format below - MPF (talk) 18:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not against the non-classic composition, but the branch perfectly aligned with its head makes it ambiguous. --Elekhh (talk) 21:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Landscape version[edit]

same topi antelope, landscape format

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info votes for the landscape version below this line
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support much better imo! Maybe a little thight on the left side, but very much better than the portrait-format. --mathias K 14:15, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, better than above. Yann (talk) 14:32, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Nevit Dilmen (talk) 14:45, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Still major blurring and focus problems. Steven Walling 16:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Υπέρ --патриот8790Say whatever you want 05:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - yes slighty blurred, but try doing better with a fast-galloping wild animal! Just a tiny bit of motion blur also helps convery the impression of speed. - MPF (talk) 18:28, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Muhammad (talk) 06:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--MZaplotnik (my contribs) 05:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Avala (talk) 12:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals
The chosen alternative is: File:Serengeti_Topi5.jpg

File:Side Ruines, Turkey.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2010 at 10:22:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ancient theater in Side, Turkey, Antalya Province


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Threshold formation.gif, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2010 at 13:24:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Formation of channel and attainment of threshold voltage in a nanowire MOSFET
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Saumitra R Mehrotra & Gerhard Klimeck - uploaded by Beatnik8983 - nominated by Jovianeye -- JovianEye (talk) 13:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JovianEye (talk) 13:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:21, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It may be useful and hard to get but it's not an excellent graphic. It seems there is a window hidden in the middle. And the watermark on the right is ugly and pixelated. Last but not least I do not understand it. --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Not what I would call an excellent presentation of scientific data. It is a cheap looking screenshot, cluttered with widgets, a watermark, remnants of a second window. The transistor structure is not indicated, scales/labels are missing on the second plot, the height scale is not well defined and very hard to make out. Image description lacks basic information. --Dschwen (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cody escadron delta (talk) 08:13, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Not a single support vote is stating a reason. Interesting. --Dschwen (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
    • You don't need to give a reason if it's obvious why you're supporting. I supported because it has high EV. I didn't think anyone would have such a hard time figuring that out that they would get suspicious. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
      • That is an easy thing to claim and even easier to debunk by giving detailed criticism of the illustration as I did above. Looking sciency is not the same as having high EV. --Dschwen (talk) 19:33, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
        • No, it's not the same thing, but this one has both (used on 14 articles on 6 different languages). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • It wouldn't even pass as a QI with that watermark. --Ikiwaner (talk) 14:15, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per the concerns brought up above - I would think that the graphics could be better, but if not, then the other imperfections that this image has could certainly not be present in the graphic (e.g. oodly-positioned watermark with a non-background-color filling for the "B", the windows fragment in between, etc.). ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 21:15, 27 August 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Wild flowers and errosion in Pacifica 1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2010 at 15:22:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wild flowers and erosion
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 15:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry Mila, the idea is great, it reminds me at your octupus and lighthouse picture. But sadly there are several stitching errors (maybe caused by the different focus points) over the whole image and the distorted houses are also not so nice. The composition and colours are really good, but maybe a single shot with a short focal length and less errors would be better. bg mathias K 16:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I really like this picture, unfortunately, Leviathan is right. There are many blurred areas in the photo. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:09, 26 August 2010 (UTC)


Well, at least some of the blurred area are not due to stitching errors, originals have the same problem. This was one hard to take image. I've no problems with your opposes, so, nothing to be sorry about Face-smile.svg. I wanted to show the contrast between the spring flowers and disaster. Both were caused by rains. Of course the erosion was also due to waves action.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose support comment The High Fin Sperm Whale. Ggia (talk) 10:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Avala (talk) 12:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Alt 1[edit]

Wild flowers and erosion

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Mbz1 (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Could you specify which island this was one and possibly geocode? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:57, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
It is not an island. It is mainland US, w:Pacifica, California. I added geolocation, and please do not tell me that you are going to oppose the image anyway. Just kidding Face-smile.svg--Mbz1 (talk) 19:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
I fixed blurred areas. Please take another look.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice composition with contrast between flowers and ocean --George Chernilevsky talk 20:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose stay too many siwiched error --Croucrou (talk) 10:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I will try to fix some later today.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Fixed again.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Still a few blurring problems, but I think it's good enough now. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:37, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain I'm sorry this image was already a Quality Image Candidate in april 2010,15, and was declined after a consensual review if I'm not wrong. I don't see here any improvement justifying a promotion as "Featured Picture"...--Jebulon (talk) 10:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
It is an absolutely different version that should be reviewed again. The stitching errors were fixed. If you see some, please point them out, but do not oppose because an old image was opposed. --Mbz1 (talk) 11:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
That was only for the complete information of reviewers... I remove my oppose because if I remember well I didn't vote nor oppose at the time, but I cannot support because, as I said, "I don't see here any improvement justifying a promotion as "Featured Picture" ". Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 14:29, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
You are absolutely welcome to oppose, but there are many improvements. All stitching errors were fixed.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
I respectfully think it would have been fair to say that it is another version of a previous nomination in QIC...--Jebulon (talk) 22:12, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
You are right, but QI got opposed because it had stitching errors. The new image does not.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ggia (talk) 10:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Avala (talk) 12:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Wasserschloss Mespelbrunn, 6.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2010 at 16:40:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Rainer Lippert - uploaded by Rainer Lippert - nominated by Rainer Lippert
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 16:40, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support {Oppose} - overdone perspective correction leads to image appearing to fan outwards toward the top - MPF (talk) 12:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC) New edit better, thanks! vote changed MPF (talk) 18:24, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
    Hallo, ich habe mal eine neue Version drübergeladen. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 17:13, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good in every way. No overdone perspective correction. Strong support. -- MJJR (talk) 21:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support New version looks very good to me. --Petritap (talk) 04:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This looks like a very good picture with good exposure even though I don't understand the German description. --Korman (talk) 06:39, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Doucus (talk) 16:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good exposure? I see severe overexposure of the sky and also slightly of the facade. The composition is good. --Ikiwaner (talk) 04:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--MZaplotnik (my contribs) 05:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment That image is definitely too blue. I've uploaded a corrected version: File:Wasserschloss_Mespelbrunn,_6_changed.jpg. Feel free to do whatever you want to do with. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:11, 1 September 2010 (UTC) P. S.: EXIF data would be nice.
    Die andere Version gefällt mir sehr gut. Aber kann man das Bild bei so vielen Votings noch austauschen? EXIF ist nun drinnen. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 20:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
    Alternativen kann man immer ergänzen. Und wenn die mehr Stimmen hat als das Original, wird sie und nicht die andere Fassung exzellent. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
    OK, dass wusste ich nicht, danke. Habe es auch gleich mal bei der Nahebrücke so gemacht. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 20:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Avala (talk) 12:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support: overexposure a bit disturbing, but all in all a very good picture --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:29, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikiwaner --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Alt 1[edit]

Wasserschloss Mespelbrunn, 6 changed.jpg

  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportDerHexer (Talk) 20:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose maybe more evenly colours, but more overexposure parts --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:29, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:21, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture
The chosen alternative is: File:Wasserschloss_Mespelbrunn,_6.jpg

File:Leaf & light.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2010 at 16:15:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Leaf & light in the wood


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 22:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Anas rubripes PM3.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2010 at 21:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

American Black Duck
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 21:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cephas (talk) 21:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nice shot of a creature in the wild.--Sandahl (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice sharp foto of the creature with no human intrusion. Looks like the bird is very friendly to people. Wish all birds were like this. --Korman (talk) 05:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain Nice. But composition issue: the shadow of the tail is unfortunately cropped. --Jebulon (talk) 15:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New crop with tail shadow --Cephas (talk) 21:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
    • Then Symbol support vote.svg Support. Sorry, Cephas !--Jebulon (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Citron (talk) 07:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quack, quack. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 07:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Manavgat Waterfull.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2010 at 22:44:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alt 1[edit]

Wild flowers and erosion

  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportDerHexer (Talk) 00:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 02:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not sure about the white balance. The parts closest to the viewer, the trees and the sky look a bit reddish to me. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Tarentola mauritanica Calabria.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2010 at 12:30:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tarentola mauritanica in Calabria (Italy)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mystère Martin - uploaded by Mystère Martin - nominated by Mystère Martin -- Mystère Martin (talk) 12:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mystère Martin (talk) 12:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose compostion, situation, dof, only one side of the head and one foot is visible --mathias K 14:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, composition is not fixable here. Have the same view as Mathias. --Korman (talk) 06:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 14:01, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment What does not fit in the composition? What does not fit in the situation? What does not fit in the depth of field (or depth of focus?)? Why only one side of the head and foot are not well? I don't understand...--Mystère Martin (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Спас Колев (talk) 08:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support because of the composition --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeNo scientific interest, poor quality photography depth of field too low.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentThe low DOF is a desired effect. Why is it not well? --Mystère Martin (talk) 11:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:10, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

File:2010 Fires in South America.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2010 at 10:33:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

2010 Fires in South America
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jeff Schmaltz (NASA) - uploaded & nominated by Originalwana (talk) 10:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Widespread fires throughout South America. The smoke from the fires extends over the entire 2,500-kilometre length of the image. Notice how the smoke is contained by the Andes.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As nominator Originalwana (talk) 10:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Interesting image. What is the meaning of the red rectangles? bamse (talk) 11:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • The fires are outlined in red. P. S. Burton (talk) 18:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Shoes of the victims of Majdanek.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2010 at 12:42:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An exhibition at Sate Museum at Majdanek, showing the shoes of the victims killed in this German Nazi concentracion camp.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Von.grzanka (talk) 12:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- as nominator Von.grzanka (talk) 12:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- I'm not sure if the description is correct. I'm not very good at English, so help would be very appreciated.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is a good motive. But your photo is far away from a featured picture, I'm sorry. I write my reasons with my ideas for improvement in German, because my English isn't good enough to say it in English. I contact my personal translater User:Dschwen :-) in promise that he will render my test. Weder die Komposition noch die technische Ausführung können überzeugen. Der Blickwinkel und die Perspektive sind gut, aber rechts und links hast du viel zu wenig Platz gelassen. Die Schuhe sind teilweise abgeschnitten, das sollte nicht sein. Dann solltest du beim nächsten Mal, falls es eines gibt, ein Stativ benutzen. Denn um das Foto aus der Hand ohne Verwacklung zu schießen, hat deine Kamera für die benötigte kurze Belichtungszeit ISO 800 und eine weit geöffnete Blende gewählt. Der ISO-Wert verursacht ein sichtbares Farbrauschen im Hintergund, aber das Hauptproblem liegt bei der großen Blende von f/3,5. Bei so einem langstreckten Motiv will man einen möglichst großen Schärfebereich haben, um das Motiv möglichst großflächig scharf anzuschauen und nicht nur den klienen, anfokussierten Bereich einigermaßen scharf sehen. Mit einer Blende von zum Beispiel f/13 oder kleiner und einem ISO-Wert von 100 hätte sich vielleicht die Belichtungszeit stark erhört, was auf einem Stativ kein Problem gewesen wäre und zusammen mit mehr Platz rechts und links vielleicht zu einem exzellenten Bild geführt hätte. Vielleicht kannst du das Motiv ja nochmal ablichten? Grüße --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:48, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Liberal translation: Neither composition nor technical aspects convince me. Angle and perspective are good, but you left way too little room on the left and right sides of the frame. The shoes are partially cut off; that should be avoided. Next time you should - if available - use a tripod. To take the picture hand-held without camera shake your camera chose ISO 800 and an open aperture to get the necessary short exposure time. The ISO setting caused visible chroma noise in the background, but the main problem is the large aperture of f/3.5. For a subject with this much depth you'll want a larger depth of field to get a large portion of the subject in good focus and not just the small region where your autofocus locked in. With an aperture of f/13 or smaller (?) and an ISO value of 100 the exposure time would have been much longer, which would not have been an issue when using a tripod, and together with more room on the sides it might have led to a featured picture. --Dschwen (talk) 20:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Apatura eat frog 2010 G2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2010 at 07:08:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Butterflies Emperors eat a moisture from a body of a frog


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mbz1 (talk) 13:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Xysticus sp qtl1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2010 at 12:17:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crab spider on Marsh Cranesbill
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by --Quartl (talk) 12:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A Crab Spider lurking on Marsh Cranesbill. It is not possible to determine the exact species of this spider without a closer examination of the genitals. --Quartl (talk) 12:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quartl (talk) 12:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good picture with nice composition and colours. but for my taste the crab spider is just too tiny on this picture. There are nearly no details visible. A higher magnification (maybe like here) would be much better. Sorry! bg mathias K 14:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
    • How if you think about it the other way round: "flower with spider"? --Elekhh(talk) 21:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Hmm good question! Face-smile.svg I think it would be better... --mathias K 09:50, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As per mathias K.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nevit (talk • contribs)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In addition to the composition and coloring, which I think are great, I personally don't mind the spider being a bit too small - it's detailed enough for me, and I think the view is very artistic and pleasing. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 21:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I was actually thinking about nominating it, I find it outstanding. --Elekhh (talk) 21:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF (talk) 21:30, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Mathias. Steven Walling 23:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wolf (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I see it as the picture of a flower with a spider, not the reverse. Nice colours. Don't really understand the somewhat wide crop at the left side. --Cayambe (talk) 08:26, 4 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:12, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Bergbaumaschine.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2010 at 09:06:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

*Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose again an overdone hdr with no additional value to a normal photo. --mathias K 12:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because the quality really not good enough. Sorry but the picture is not really sharp, some parts are very noisy, and really strange colours. I would like to see a picture without doing any hdr... Gruß mathias K 14:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Lambis crocata 2010 G1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2010 at 15:48:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

another natural marvel


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:03, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals

File:Park Slunj 2010.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2010 at 17:54:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SLUNJ CROATIA PARK
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by MarioCRO - uploaded by MarioCRO - nominated by MarioCRO -- MarioCRO (talk) 17:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MarioCRO (talk) 17:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Quickly glancing at it, there's a lot of noticeable overexposure, primarily looking at the sky and the sidewalk. The sides should also probably be sliced off and made straight. Not as major and more of a personal opinion, but I'm also not a huge fan of the large shadow caused by the tree in the foreground; it's kind of distracting and doesn't contrast well with the brighter parts of the image. Nice image, but not FP-worthy in my opinion, sorry. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 21:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too overexposed --Mr. Mario (talk) 03:05, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice but technical issues, mainly heavy chromatic aberration on both sides (large violet fringes). Sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 09:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I tried to fix some issues raised above in File:Park_Slunj_2010_changed.jpg. Feel free to do whatever you want to do with. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose yes it is a panorama but it's still a panorama made of individual touristy p&s snapshots.--Avala (talk) 12:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think the composition is not too bad, but the pic is unsharp and has hard CA. The light was also very bad. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Serengeti Elefantenbulle.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2010 at 17:38:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Solitary male African Bush Elephant
I like that image too. However the original has already slightly brightened shadows as you can see in the metadata. I try avoid bigger adjustments on shadows/highlights. --Ikiwaner (talk) 20:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Okay. But I seem to be blind because I cannot see it in the metadata. Where is it situated? Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
crs:FillLight, watch the raw xml. --Ikiwaner (talk) 04:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals

File:Paris Las Vegas Eiffel Tower 2010.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2010 at 03:11:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paris Las Vegas 2010
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by hsuc - uploaded by hsuc - nominated by hsuc -- Hsuc (talk) 03:11, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hsuc (talk) 03:11, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Copyrighted sculpture with no freedom of panorama in USA? Is the pic legitimate on commons? MPF (talk) 21:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Is this also true for the copy of the Eiffel Tower in Las Vegas or only for the original one in Paris? --AngMoKio (talk) 09:24, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose imo lack of compositon, way too much black areas for my taste. --mathias K 09:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral very good quality, but poor composition (street latern, too much dark parts (one, two, three hours earlier would be better I think), some other disturbing things) :( --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Alte Nahebrücke, Bad Kreuznach, 5.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2010 at 10:07:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Rainer Lippert - uploaded by Rainer Lippert - nominated by Rainer Lippert -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 10:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 10:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC) New version is better. --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:21, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice composition but much too bright, also too blue. Some parts also underexposured. Changed all in File:Alte_Nahebrücke,_Bad_Kreuznach,_5_changed.jpg. Feel free to do whatever you want to do with. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
    Leider verstehe ich nicht alles. In den anderen Bildversionen wurde bemängelt, dass es viel zu dunkel sei. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
    Deutsch: Eine gute Komposition, das Bild ist aber generell zu hell (siehe Histogramm; vor allem am Himmel und den Häusern merklich zu sehen), außerdem hat es einen Blaustich (erkennbar am blauen Dunst, der das ganze Bild überzieht und vor allem an den Häusern zu sehen ist). Einige Teile waren außerdem unterbelichtet. Das alles habe ich im Foto korrigiert. Mach damit, was du denkst, man damit machen sollte. (Zum Beispiel als Alternative aufstellen und noch ein paar Tage es kandidieren zu lassen, denn das Motiv ist meines Erachtens wirklich featureable, nur die Farben stimmen nicht wirklich. Ach ja, die Grundhelligkeit habe ich zwar herabgesetzt, die dunklen Stellen [und ausschließlich diese] aufgehellt.)
    DerHexer (Talk) 20:40, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
    Jetzt sehe ich erst überhaupt deine bearbeitete Version. Danke dafür! Habe zunächst deine Antwort in Google übersetzt. Die Version gefällt mir eigentlich ausgesprochen gut. Einzig der Himmel ist dort jetzt meine ich stärker verrauscht wie bei meiner Version. Dennoch würde ich, wenn du nichts dagegen hast, das Kandidatenbild hier austauschen. Bis jetzt hat erst Berthold Werner gevotet, den man dann darauf ansprechen könnte. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 20:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
    Himmel ist nun entrauscht, hab nochmal einen Tick heller gemacht. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:05, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Alt 1[edit]

Alte Nahebrücke, Bad Kreuznach, 5 changed.jpg

  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportDerHexer (Talk) 21:05, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Besser. Die Farben erinnern mich an 1980er Ansichtskarten. (Colors look like a 1980th postcard) --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Citron (talk) 22:36, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Grjótagjá caves in summer 2009 (2).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2010 at 14:09:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grjótagjá caves near Mývatn lake, Iceland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Chmee2 - uploaded by Chmee2 - nominated by Chmee2 -- Chmee2 (talk) 14:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Chmee2 (talk) 14:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High quality cave pictures are rare. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:39, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per HFSW Steven Walling 23:28, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, looks good. I've uploaded a derivate with reduced over- and underexposure: File:Grjótagjá_caves_in_summer_2009_(2)_by_DerHexer.jpg. Feel free to do whatever you want to do with. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks good. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 02:15, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Bright beautiful colours. Looks like the right amount of exposure. --Korman (talk) 06:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the shadows add to the mood. I prefer the original version. --99of9 (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful; thin mist in the background adds to the athmosphere. --Myrabella (talk) 08:30, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 10:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Awesome caves, awesome reflection and the blue is nice. Everything is sharp, composition is good. --Aktron (talk) 21:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The quality is really bad, some rocks are unsharp, some overexposed. Also that green thing that looks as graffiti on the right hand side spoils the image for me. Sorry. The crop in the right lower corner should be fixed.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done Corner is fixed, thx for notice --Chmee2 (talk) 22:28, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral, looks good but to low quality. Trance Light (talk) 22:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry but per Mila. Quality could be much better. --mathias K 09:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sharpless. --Mile (talk) 10:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Petritap (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tlusťa (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sharpness could be much better, also over-exposure in the lower right corner, some CA in the left part of the image. Sorry. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely. --Calibas (talk) 04:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 15:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural

File:M4A4 cutaway.svg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2010 at 17:49:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tank M4A4 cutway
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Malyszkz - uploaded by Malyszkz - nominated by Malyszkz -- Malyszkz (talk) 17:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Malyszkz (talk) 17:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beatiful! One small remark - no. 22, transmission shaft as I assume, is drawn in a different style (lack of outline, shading) from other details, which makes it kind of incompatible with the rest of image. The same goes for the gun ammunition, however it's less visible for it.
    • I think it's supposed to indicate that it's not "sliced" and sort of protrudes from the image in the direction of the viewer. And I like it. And just out of curiosity, if someone could explain: what's that yellow-golden stuff in the back? Wolf (talk) 20:31, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
      • Some kind of fan? Engine cooler? I'm not an expert in tank building ;) Masur (talk) 06:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Pattonic support. Wolf (talk) 20:31, 29 August 2010 (UTC) [don't ask me what pattonic means, I just know it fits a Sherman tank]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Like it. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Takabeg (talk) 12:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Спас Колев (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support JovianEye (talk) 04:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great drawing. --Lošmi (talk) 12:19, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:50, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

File:Baie de Quiberon Carnac.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2010 at 10:00:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Along the coast of Quiberon Bay, at Carnac (Brittany, France)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Myrabella - uploaded by Myrabella - nominated by Myrabella -- Myrabella (talk) 10:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Myrabella (talk) 10:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't see something featured in the quality and composition, sorry --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Same reasons as above -- Any1s (talk) 17:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
    • I'll try to choose a better one next time. --Myrabella (talk) 21:24, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination

File:Curtiss Jenny Płock.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2010 at 09:14:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A modern-day replica of the Curtiss Jenny
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Łukasz Golowanow a.k.a. Wolf (talk) 09:14, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf (talk) 09:14, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nicely captured. With a slight regret for the unattractive foliage at the lower right. --Cayambe (talk) 17:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Aircraft is not entirely sharp (yes I know it's very hard to do), crop not optimal (chimney cut off, boat to the left cut off, trees at the bottom right also cut off), distracting background (ship yard) --Kabelleger (talk) 19:59, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:27, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose dull colours.--Avala (talk) 12:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 15:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Alhambra in the evening.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2010 at 11:54:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alhambra of Granada, evening.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Jebulon (talk) 11:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as nominator -- Jebulon (talk) 11:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment it is a little bit tilt.. Ggia (talk) 12:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done fixed.--Jebulon (talk) 14:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Steven Walling 18:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 02:35, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wonderful --Schnobby (talk) 07:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ggia (talk) 08:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I uploaded a new version of the file.. even you fixed the tilt.. it was still a little tilt.. and I fixed. Ggia (talk) 08:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support little more sharpness and resolution would be great, but the light is awesome! --mathias K 09:57, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice view in a beautiful light. --Myrabella (talk) 10:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Doucus (talk) 16:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As mathias -- MJJR (talk) 21:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice evening photo of the Alhambra. Consistent colours. --Korman (talk) 05:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Takabeg (talk) 12:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Jonathunder (talk) 15:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Υπέρ --патриот8790Say whatever you want 18:20, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice light and composition, too noisy and soft. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:21, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose light is good, but the quality isn't it --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Gaivota - Portosín-5.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2010 at 14:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yellow-legged Gull
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created - uploaded by Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez - nominated by -- Ikiwaner (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikiwaner (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, still beautiful image although the second foot is not sharp. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think that I can vote--Lmbuga (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice quality, little dof problems on the head, but overall very good! --mathias K 09:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment hm, nice composition, but I think it's pixelized, isn't it? Maybe a bit upscaled? Or maybe I'm wrong? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:07, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • It has not been "up"scalled or "down"scalled (I don't know if it's pixelized, I can upload another version with less sharp if you want. I have the RAW file).--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 16:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC) 16:38, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 07:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's a juvenile, please add this to the file description. A geotag is also on the wish list. :-) --Cayambe (talk) 14:49, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • The localization is: -8.948750495910645 (longitud/lonxitude), 42.761948588616605 (latitud/latitude), 29T 504193 4734381 (UTM), 29T NH03 (MGRS). I will try to incorporate the data, I hope to be able I would try to incorporate the data, but I do not know: I don't remember--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 16:42, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Molothrus ater immature CT.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2010 at 21:26:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brown-headed Cowbird
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 21:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cephas (talk) 21:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I really like this one! the quality is high and the grasshopper (?) leg is a nice gimmick... ;-) --mathias K 09:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:57, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support not the best of your photos, but a really good one --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per mathias--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 11:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF (talk) 09:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Although a less disturbing bokeh would have been nice -- Any1s (talk) 18:03, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Balearica regulorum 1 Luc Viatour.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2010 at 11:56:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Balearica regulorum
dust spot removed ;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 05:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the shadows of the feathers on the head --Schnobby (talk) 16:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharp and nice composition. --Elekhh (talk) 22:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support An excellent zoo picture: it shows the head and neck in full detail and there is no disturbing or unnatural background. --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikiwaner (talk) 13:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Porsche FARA race Miami Speedway 8358.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2010 at 11:32:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Porsche racing
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by --Dori - Talk 11:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dori - Talk 11:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MarioCRO (talk) 12:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A little bit dark, perhaps, but otherwise great. Wolf (talk) 12:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Zoom, zoom. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Wolf. --mathias K 21:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Υπέρ --патриот8790Say whatever you want 06:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice --Chmee2 (talk) 14:16, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great shot, but could use some local level adjustment as already mentioned by Wolf -- Any1s (talk) 17:44, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

Image:Schacko04.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2010 at 12:35:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Schacko Trachtenhut Bergmannstracht
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by powerhauer - uploaded by powerhauer - nominated by powerhauer
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Powerhauer (talk) 06:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Please login to vote. Yann (talk) 12:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Framing is really suboptimal : cut handle on the left, fold in the fabric on the right... --MAURILBERT (discuter) 01:13, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikiwaner (talk) 13:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

File:14-33-29-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2010 at 08:00:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Inside the Ouvrage Schoenenbourg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 08:00, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 08:00, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice bunker how I know :-) This pic shows imo the bunker best, the rail system and the lighting. Good quality. Much better than the other one imo --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wonderful perspective. --Jebulon (talk) 15:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Jebulon -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice picture but imho not best perspective. Not having centered the bunker is still acceptable but for me the position is too low. So Ceiling seems to go faster to the center than floor does. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:40, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 18:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Impressive underground view. --Myrabella (talk) 19:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 15:48, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:14-40-48-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2010 at 08:03:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kitchen in the Ouvrage Schoenenbourg


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Chrysomya albiceps.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2010 at 00:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A mix of colours. C/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Muhammad (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment + Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral for now there is a little dustspot straight above the fly. Rest is pretty good, dof is a little low, but sharpness (downscaled??) and colours are good. bg mathias K 12:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • now Symbol support vote.svg Support --mathias K 11:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Until dust spot removed. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:21, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good colours and composition. I'd like to recommend the removal of the disturbing OOF light spot at the upper right. --Cayambe (talk) 10:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:16, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, but I see one more dust spot above the fly. --Von.grzanka (talk) 16:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I removed the 2 I've seen. Muhammad if you don't like it, just undo it. bg mathias K 14:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Any1s (talk) 17:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wolf (talk) 19:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Cuenca Ecuador Corte sup Just 03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2010 at 13:36:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cuenca, Ecuador, Supreme Court of Justice. Combination of colonial and modern architecture.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info everything by Cayambe -- Cayambe (talk) 13:36, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cuenca, Ecuador. Supreme Court of Justice, interior. Combination of colonial and modern architecture.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cayambe (talk) 13:36, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Спас Колев (talk) 08:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 15:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Any1s (talk) 18:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, the perspective does not convince me, sorry. Half the ceiling is cropped, the whole floor is missing (the archs are cropped in the middle). Colours etc. are nevertheless good. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:28, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per DerHexer. Picture is imo not very useful for Wikipedia articles, the composition isn't good imo. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dislike the composition: neighter the roof nor the courtyard is fully visible, and the uninteresting lamp takes central position obscuring the central arch.- Elekhh (talk) 22:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per DerHexer and Elekhh. Yann (talk) 05:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I would prefer more creative composition. Ggia (talk) 07:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:39, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Image:Bahnsteighdr.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2010 at 06:29:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bahnsteig in HDR
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Powerhauer - uploaded by Powerhauer - nominated by Powerhauer -- Powerhauer (talk) 06:29, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Powerhauer (talk) 06:29, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question What is shown on the picture? What could be illustrated with it? --Спас Колев (talk) 08:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good example for an overdone HDR image. The quality is bad and using HDR brings no advantage over "standard" fotography or carefully exposure blended pictures. --mathias K 09:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, I'm very sorry :( What I like is the composition, but the technical realization is very bad. Some parts of the sky are grainy, some others just has some small noise and the next is very soft. Another piece of the image is in nice quality, the next is very unsharp and noisy. I like the light and the colours from the HDR, even if it's now oversaturated and it has at some parts a halo effect. Do you use a tripod? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good HDR, but Nnot of the best educational quality. Steven Walling 17:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Extreme noise and overdone HDR. Diti the penguin 10:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Grotesque light levels; also description "Bahnsteig" completely inadequate (where is it? why do the rails disappear into an apparent building site? why do the steps at the end of the platform descend into a shrub bed, not the platform?). - MPF (talk) 10:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:36, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Steve Hogarth-Marillion-2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2010 at 08:33:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Steve Hogarth - Marillion - Live in Krakow, Poland 2009.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Grzegorz Chorus - uploaded by MrPanyGoff - nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff (talk) 08:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Steve Hogarth - Marillion - Live in Krakow, Poland 2009.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 08:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MrPanyGoff (talk) 08:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral A good stage picture with good background light. For an excellent image i would wish less shadow in the eyes. --Ikiwaner (talk) 19:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikiwaner -- Any1s (talk) 15:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Farmer in Tamil Nadu 1993.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2010 at 21:23:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Farmer in Tamil Nadu
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Mbz1 (talk) 02:54, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--GerardM (talk) 06:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent composition with mirror in water -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per George --mathias K 14:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Out4blood (talk) 00:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF (talk) 10:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Any1s (talk) 16:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support excellent composition with the reflection in the water and the unusual point of view for a portrait. --Ikiwaner (talk) 19:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Valuable educational subject from the Global South and quite nice composition. Steven Walling 21:10, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 10:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Why are the horns yellow and blue? --99of9 (talk) 07:04, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's part of the traditional Hindu reverence for cattle. These are likely this farmer's oxen for hauling/plowing, and as such are some of his most valuable assets. Steven Walling 22:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wolf (talk) 19:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: People

File:Blossom of Mirabelle plum.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2010 at 11:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blossom of Mirabelle plum


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:12, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Plants/Flowers

File:Chevre-Souris global.fond.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2010 at 10:37:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fossil of Balearian mouse-goat
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC) - uploaded by -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)] - nominated by -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well done photo and perfect angle of looks -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support damn good picture! Quality, resolution, sharpness, value... Great! --mathias K 14:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I would prefer white transparent background rather this one.. But I strong support the image. Ggia (talk) 16:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Steven Walling 22:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great work!--Mbz1 (talk) 01:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not a huge fan of the background (I'd probably prefer all black), but fantastic quality nonetheless. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 02:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Cesco77 (talk) 11:03, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support despite of the background -- Any1s (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 10:08, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:11, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good quality, but I don't like the color gradient of the background. Why is it not completely black?--Citron (talk) 16:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It is a fantasy. Obviously it bothers. So I abandon the idea of setting up color gradient of the background for my next picture.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:10, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

File:Czech W-3 Sokół 8496 cropped.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2010 at 21:41:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Czech W-3 Sokół
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Łukasz Golowanow & Maciek Hypś - uploaded & nominated by Wolf (talk) 21:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Okay, I am aware of the fact that this photo has certain drawbacks. But I like the way the reddish tint shows the shape of the clouds (even though by itself it should be considered a flaw), I also like the heli itself (note that it caught the green lights blinking). Well, take it or leave it :)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf (talk) 21:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great composition and lighting, even with the other flaws. An all-around quality educational photo. Steven Walling 01:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Steven! --mathias K 09:53, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 21:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Avala (talk) 12:21, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 13:50, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:NgoroNgoro Suedafrika-Kronenkranich.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2010 at 16:58:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wildlife Grey-crowned crane in Tanzania
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created - uploaded - nominated by Ikiwaner (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikiwaner (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:10, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Steven Walling 22:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - MPF (talk) 10:28, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cesco77 (talk) 11:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ...and again. :-) Looks like the NgoroNgoro crater is the paradise for animal photography. bg mathias K 14:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition. didn't get to see this when I was there --Muhammad (talk) 05:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 13:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 17:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Rust on iron.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2010 at 05:01:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Colors of rust
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Laitr Keiows - uploaded by Laitr Keiows - nominated by Laitr Keiows -- Laitr Keiows (talk) 05:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Laitr Keiows (talk) 05:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - good pic, but description could be made much more informative (e.g. what is the rust on, in what climatic exposure, and over how long did it develop?) - MPF (talk) 10:48, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because only a part of the center could be accepted as sharp. But the composition is very nice. :-) Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Sympetrum sanguineum 01 (MK).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2010 at 09:48:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sympetrum sanguineum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info a Ruddy Darter (Sympetrum sanguineum) c/u/n by mathias K 09:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- mathias K 09:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good DOF, nice quality. Imo featured --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:59, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support composition could still be a little better (pretty much branch in the picture), but sharpness is very good--Loz (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The ugly branch is way too dominant in the picture. The lower right quarter of the pic is especially an eyesore. --Petritap (talk) 05:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Astonishing detail -- Any1s (talk) 17:58, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 18:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wolf (talk) 09:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quartl (talk) 09:24, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Fishing boat in Magerøya, Norway.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2010 at 20:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fishing boat in Magerøya near North Cape, Norway.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Inisheer - uploaded by Inisheer - nominated by Inisheer -- inisheer (talk) 20:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support small ccw tilt and a bit too dark imo, but otherwise very good --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Abit dark but the clouds are better on this picture. Remi Mathis (talk) 16:14, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ludo (talk) 17:15, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Chandres (talk) 09:24, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support meow. DarkoNeko 17:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Alt[edit]

Alternative version

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info retouched by Carschten
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:42, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportDerHexer (Talk) 15:55, 4 September 2010 (UTC) Why do not participate more users in this candidature?
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Any1s (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - Lovely composition but otherwise a bit grainy. I'm surprised to see the ISO was only 200. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 14:49, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

File:20020800 Sanctuary of the Great Gods Palaiopolis Samothrace island Thrace Greece.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2010 at 06:54:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sanctuary of the Great Gods, Paleopolis, Samothrace island, Thrace Greece
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 06:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ggia (talk) 06:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment scanned image from a slide film (fuji sensia 100asa) Ggia (talk) 06:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Low quality.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment if you want to vote oppose in my pictures you are welcome to do it.. but not to remove my pictures because of low quality. [2] You are welcome to vote oppose not only to this but to all my pictures (because of noise, composition etc). And definitely this photo is not low quality. It is made be fuji sensia positive film 100asa.. and films have usually noise etc. Unless there is a rule that every picture here should be made with the latest digital camera low noise technology. Ggia (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because of very poor image quality according to the present standars -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment the quality is not very poor.. Ggia (talk) 08:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Right, the quality is not "very poor", but may be not good enough for FP. I rotated the image 0.40 CW. Yann (talk) 07:45, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Actinoscyphia aurelia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2010 at 11:22:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Actinoscyphia aurelia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Aquapix and Expedition to the Deep Slope 2007 - uploaded by Citron - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 11:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Citron (talk) 11:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 12:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose strange composition. The animal is neither at half nor at full size on the photo. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good quality, however, part of the tentacles are cut off. I'd like to see the whole thing. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Shouldn't it be "Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Actinoscyphia aurelia.jpg" instead of "Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Actinoscyphia aurelia.jpg"? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:38, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Oops! I take a mystake. --Citron (talk) 19:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Could you add a description above please? Yann (talk) 14:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Où ça? Le fichier a bien une description.--Citron (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Alternate[edit]

Actinoscyphia aurelia 1.jpg


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals
The chosen alternative is: File:Actinoscyphia_aurelia_1.jpg

File:Gaivota - Portosín-3.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2010 at 17:54:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Larus michahellis, Portosín, Porto do Son, Galicia (Spain)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Salamandra salamandra Male Karpaty.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2010 at 07:41:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fire Salamander (Salamandra salamandra), Malé Karpaty, Slovakia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Doronenko - uploaded by Doronenko - nominated by Doronenko -- Doronenko (talk) 07:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Doronenko (talk) 07:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strong flash reflect. Yann (talk) 07:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Much too noisy + reflections -- Any1s (talk) 11:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Yann --Chmee2 (talk) 12:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition is okay, but there are the problems Any1s refered, sorry --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:04, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
    • You mean oppose
      • oh, yeah, my mistake, sorry. Thanks :) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose harsh lighting, noise. --Quartl (talk) 09:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Oversaturated Cathy Richards (talk) 09:54, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
    • I think that's just what they look like. --IdLoveOne (talk) 20:26, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
    • I'm sorry that the Nature oversaturated Salamandras... Doronenko (talk) 11:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:26, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Vaux le vicomte 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2010 at 06:45:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Oops, there was one Jebulon too much. --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
signature corrected by --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 11:55, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Mbz1 (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice and interesting, and now inserted in WP articles. --Myrabella (talk) 06:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --mathias K 15:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Piling on. Steven Walling 17:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Profile view of Atlantis (STS-129).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2010 at 14:16:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Profile view of Atlantis
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NASA - uploaded & nominated by Originalwana (talk) 14:16, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Unique view of space shuttle Atlantis on its penultimate mission.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As nominator Originalwana (talk) 14:16, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much black space. Yann (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Could you rotate it 180? --HoverFly (Contribs...Chat?) 15:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think it should be rotated, since that is its actual position, but the Shuttle itself is very noisy, and most is just blackness. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:06, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because of poor image quality -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Crepemrytle.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2010 at 15:17:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Closeup of white crepe myrtle flowers
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because the picture is not sharp -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Alt 1[edit]

Alt1

Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because the picture is not sharp -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:54, 11 September 2010 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:TheTower-Ouranopolis-Athos-Greece.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2010 at 23:08:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Old Byzantine Tower in Ouranopolis.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by MrPanyGoff - uploaded by MrPanyGoff - nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff (talk) 23:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Old Byzantine Tower in Ouranopolis, Athos peninsula, Greece.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 23:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MrPanyGoff (talk) 23:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cephas (talk) 01:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Υπέρ --патриот8790Say whatever you want 06:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Спас Колев (talk) 08:20, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Υπέρ -- Takabeg (talk) 13:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very interesting subject, nice composition, good sharpness. White balance seems a bit off (too yellow?). And why is the lower right corner so dark? -- MJJR (talk) 19:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A little on the soft side though. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose it's not a bit too yellow, it's much too yellow. Compare [3][4][5]. The colours are very faked. The image is also tilt. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:54, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Not so "strong" Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, but I agree with Carschten.--Jebulon (talk) 21:49, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose White balance and titled. Yann (talk) 07:57, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the center-composition. White balance is minor problem because it can be corrected. Ggia (talk) 08:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others and grey thing in bottom right corner. --99of9 (talk) 14:05, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wrong White balance --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Revised version[edit]

The Byzantine Tower in Ouranopolis - revised version.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Revised version: color balance and perspective correction.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 06:49, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK after correction. Yann (talk) 07:57, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I was to support, but I see now some strange artifacts in the lower part of the sky. Maybe I'm wrong ?--Jebulon (talk) 00:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
    Would a crop on the left side (which would also deleted some CAs) help? —DerHexer (Talk) 15:12, 11 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Creation-IMG 4784.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2010 at 06:18:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

reation of Eve, sandstone from Montbenon (Lausanne), circa 1515.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Rama - uploaded by Rama - nominated by Rama -- Rama (talk) 06:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Abstain as nominator -- Rama (talk) 06:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, very good although I'd prefer a brighter background: Black for brown is a bit too dark imho. The nice image should also be added to some articles. ;o) Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Thanks! :-)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well done extraction -- Any1s (talk) 17:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Valuable educational media for sure. Steven Walling 21:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality and EV.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:53, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support GL (talk) 12:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Black background is neutral, and nor disturbing neither distracting IMO. I find this object and this image very good. --Jebulon (talk) 21:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The same as Jebulon. Fine and valued.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 06:51, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

File:Joggins mcr1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2010 at 20:47:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Joggins Fossil Cliffs
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Rygel - uploaded by Rygel - nominated by Rygel -- Rygel, M.C. (talk) 20:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rygel, M.C. (talk) 20:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice pano. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportVery nice, please fix stitching error at the sky. I added an approximate location note.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the input, I fixed all three stitching errors in the sky and uploaded a new version. I think(?) that I did this correctly and that the retouched version is now the one that is displayed. Rygel, M.C. (talk) 13:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very special place -- Any1s (talk) 07:14, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice work. imo a little more space on the right side would be even better, but overall very nice. bg mathias K 14:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Steven Walling 17:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 22:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great! ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 23:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Υπέρ --патриот8790Say whatever you want 06:36, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Arremoulit.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2010 at 15:18:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

I want to present this picture because i think it's good. The reflections of snow on the water is something wonderful, especially in the Pyrenees.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Kaprixo - uploaded by Kaprixo - nominated by France64160 -- France64160 (talk) 15:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- France64160 (talk) 15:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Citron (talk) 22:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Noisy, unsharp, tilted, washed out, and the composition is far from ideal. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:08, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose quality not the best, composition imo okay, but the CA should be removed --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:10, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Why should the California be removed? MPF (talk) 10:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
      • hard chromatic aberration... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
        • I think it was a (failed) attempt at humor. ;) –Juliancolton | Talk 13:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
          • Nope, a reminder that many / most visitors to this site won't be familiar with that particular meaning of the acronym 'CA', and that it should always be spelled out to help everyone understand what is meant - MPF (talk) 17:28, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
            • Oh, I see (sort of). Well, given that FPC is a specialty process largely to which experienced photographers contribute, I don't think using shorthand is necessarily problematic. If we start enforcing silly rules on discussion pages as well as mainspace content, Commons' atmosphere will further degrade. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Harpon 2010.0.3.5. Global simple .JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2010 at 17:08:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A bone harpoon from the epipaleolithic era. This object is made available by the [fr:w:Muséum_de_Toulouse
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There varnish on the name. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Steven Walling 22:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:12, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - sorry to spoil the support party, but I find it too dark - the shadowed edges of the items (particularly the right-hand one) vanish into the black background. Also no sense of scale: how large are the items? - MPF (talk) 10:17, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The dimensions are given in the caption --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cesco77 (talk) 11:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Avala (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Any1s (talk) 16:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, I unluckily have to concur with MPF. The right harpon blurs into the background while all of them are quite unsharp, imho. Sorry, —DerHexer (Talk) 01:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Witty lama (talk) 10:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC) Lovely example of a museum artifact display. Witty lama (talk) 10:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Shoot, I think I was gonna nominate this, oh well. --IdLoveOne (talk) 22:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

File:Rajagopal P. V., 2003.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2010 at 12:06:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rajagopal P. V.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Simon Williams, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 12:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice portrait of an Indian leader. -- Yann (talk) 12:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, but imo the posture isn't the best with the hands like this. Also the BW doesn't works the for me and the upper right corner is overexposed. --mathias K 14:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - interesting photo with good expression, but the crop is too tight, in my opinion. Jonathunder (talk) 03:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Eight-spotted Skimmer (Libellula forensis).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2010 at 23:20:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An Eight-spotted Skimmer (Libellula forensis).
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 11:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the background is already much better than at your last one but the quality of the dragonfly is way below the macro bar. Sorry, mathias K 15:18, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Could you add a description above please? Yann (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Valued image and quality image but due to lack of sharpness not featured image quality. --Quartl (talk) 09:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --IdLoveOne (talk) 20:29, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • oppose as Quartl. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination

File:Four-spotted Chaser (Libellula quadrimaculata).JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2010 at 04:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Four-spotted Chaser (Libellula quadrimaculata) on a branch by a pond.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice, the unsharp background and the sharp animal --Schnobby (talk) 08:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry but the overall quality isn't good enough imo. The dragonfly isn't that sharp and the background is too messy. Sorry! Bg mathias K 12:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Insect good, but I don't like background, sorry --Cesco77 (talk) 11:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Decent quality, but much too disturbing background -- Any1s (talk) 16:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Cannot keep up with current macro quality. --Quartl (talk) 09:27, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination

File:Img20050526 0007 at tannheim cumulus.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2010 at 15:02:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A cloud is a visible mass of droplets of water or frozen crystals suspended in the atmosphere above the surface of the Earth or another planetary body. A cloud is also a visible mass attracted by gravity, such as masses of material in space called interstellar clouds and nebulae. Clouds are studied in the nephology or cloud physics branch of meteorology.
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because it does not meet the size minimum (it's under 2 MP) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Engelberg-Titlis cableway wallpaper.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2010 at 18:14:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Engelberg-Titlis alpine cableway
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikiwaner (talk) 05:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Damselflies August 2010-1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2010 at 18:01:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue-tailed damselflies mating
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Blue-tailed damselflies (Ischnura elegans), copula. Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:01, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:01, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:23, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Dragonfly at bottom is partially overexplosed and blurred. We have several better photo of copulation this species -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Of course --Cesco77 (talk) 11:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There are two QIs on this topic but composition-wise I find this the best. --Elekhh (talk) 14:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral nice scene but the little errors George allready mentioned prevent my support. bg mathias K 14:25, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 13:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Could you add a description above please? Yann (talk) 14:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question -- I don't understand. What kind of desciption? Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Composition is very good, but the body of the female is really overexposed. --Quartl (talk) 09:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lycaon (talk) 17:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Quartl and George. Pictogram voting info.svg Info & Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question As "Valued Images candidates" contest, this pic has now a very serious competitor with this one. Could we really promote as "Featured picture" an image which is not sure to be considered as the "best in its category in "Commons" " ?--Jebulon (talk) 21:39, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
    • VI and FP have little in common. The most valuable in not necessarily the best and vice versa. Lycaon (talk) 22:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Even in this specific case ? With exactly the same scene ? Mmmmh, not sure... Well it was only a question. I think the other one is better, but matter of taste. --Jebulon (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info - The abdomen of the female is indeed overexposed. I have uploaded an improved version. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:14, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral, could be a bit sharper, imho. The rest looks good to me. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 3 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Jimmy Wales Fundraiser Appeal edit.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2010 at 20:25:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jimmy! Featured on en.wiki
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Jimmy! Featured on en.wiki and unedited version featured on es.wiki created by Manuel Archain - uploaded by User:MickStephenson - nominated by User:Nard the Bard -- -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 20:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 20:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, nothing special, Multichill (talk) 20:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I disagree with Multichill (look at the list of articles it's used on), however, I oppose because the focus seems too shallow. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment delete, out of project scope, non-notable person (just kidding, not really ;-) . . . more relevant, after comparing with the original (cited above), I think the original is slightly better than this edit - MPF (talk) 10:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Avala (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The focus and DOF could be better. The eyes should be in focus, resulting in sharp details. Depending on the aperture the rest could have a shallow DOF with f/2.8 or larger apertures. Or else overall sharpness with smaller apertures (f/7.1 f/11 etc.) Though the relevancy/importance of Mr Wales could be sufficient for a featured picture (see en:wiki nomination) I would be glad to see a technically more advanced version. --Peter Weis (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a image valued, do not featured Dottor Claudio Segnali radio 16:19, 12 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Porto Covo August 2010-14a.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2010 at 18:06:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A beach in Porto Covo, Portugal
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Where is the lifeguard and why are the people staring at left? The Praia Grande ('Large Beach') in Port Covo, in a summer day. Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I see artifacts near the falling rocks sign. Multichill (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I can't see anything. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportThere are something that looks like a red noise at the cave's entrance and in a few other places, but still FP for me.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Some oddity causes pixellation whereever a person has a combination of light and dark skin tones or shadows. I'll mark a few people that suffer, but it's nearly everywhere. Perhaps the results of a curve or levels adjustment? --99of9 (talk) 11:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info -- I see some noise and posterization in darker parts, not pixelation. Anyway, it should be stressed that those minor effects are hardly perceived, even in full size, and that the picture was not downsampled, only cropped where necessary. The origin of these flaws is (I think) some underexposure of the individual pictures, which Hugin automatically compensated. Yes, it would look cleaner in smaller size but I want to preserve the full information. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ok, posterization is a better term. I appreciate that you've uploaded the full size, and am not advocating downsampling. I am just saying that there must be a better processing method that prevents these artifacts. Can you upload the originals so that if someone else wants to have another go at blending they can? P.S. Why don't the image notes show up on the FPC page, only on the single nomination page? --99of9 (talk) 00:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per 99of9 --Avala (talk) 12:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I sort of see what Toby is referring to, but it's not a huge issue in my opinion. I think overall this is a well-executed and high-quality panorama that I could frankly spend hours looking at – lots of detail. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • StrongSymbol support vote.svg Support per Alves' Info and Julian. The quality is very high and nearly more important at this one: the scene is very interesting and just great imo! bg mathias K 14:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support FP for me --Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 20:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cathy Richards (talk) 12:53, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's hard to avoid ghosts when stitching images with people on them. Unfortunately you missed at least one which I marked on the image. Regards -- Any1s (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info -- I have uploaded a new and lighter version where most of the pixelation/posterization problems were mitigated, by manual cloning from the original pictures. No attempt was made to eliminate the detected ghost, as I don't consider the flaw serious. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - ditto to 99of9 and Any1s; also find it a decidedly ordinary beach scene, nothing very special about it - MPF (talk) 20:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ggia (talk) 23:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment To be honest I can't see much improvement in the new version. I've marked a masking problem down at the bottom of the waves. Personally I'm much more worried about the posterization than about the ghosting. The posterization just seems like it must be fixable. --99of9 (talk) 10:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Could you add a description above please? Yann (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
    • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question -- I don't understand. What kind of desciption? Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
      • I think he means the one here: <div class="wpImageAnnotatorFile">[[File:Porto Covo August 2010-14a.jpg|x300px|'''''SHORT DESCRIPTION''''']]</div>Juliancolton | Talk 18:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
        • Yes, thanks. Yann (talk) 07:52, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Wenzelschloss.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2010 at 17:59:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wenzelschloss in Lauf an der Pegnitz, Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Rainer Lippert - uploaded by Rainer Lippert - nominated by Rainer Lippert -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 17:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 17:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:23, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support: distracting foreground, but for this circumstances a good result --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Avala (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, I like that motive. But it's imho a bit undersaturated (possibly also a bit too blue). I also removed some over-/underexposure errors in File:Wenzelschloss changed.jpg which I would recommend you to alternatively nominate. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:31, 5 September 2010 (UTC) P.S.: Translate: Anmerkung, ich mag das Motiv. Meines Erachtens ein wenig untersättig (höchstwahrscheinlich dabei ein wenig zu blau). Außerdem habe ich noch ein paar kleine Über- und Unterbelichtungen im Foto entfernt, das ich zu einer alternativen Nominierung empfehlen würde.
    Hallo, gerne kannst du deine überarbeitete Version als Alternative aufstellen. Vielen Dank dafür! Grüße
  • Could you add a description above please? Yann (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
    Ich kann leider kein Englisch. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 19:02, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • @Rainer: er hat dich gebeten, eine kurze Bildbeschreibung oben bei „SHORT DESCRIPTION“ anzugeben. Ich habe es mal für dich erledigt.
    @Yann: ✓ Done --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Alt 1[edit]

Wenzelschloss changed.jpg


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Blue Wildebeest, Ngorongoro.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2010 at 05:13:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 05:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Muhammad (talk) 05:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Could you add a description above please? Yann (talk) 14:11, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great sharpness, lighting, and composition. Glad to see this one is already being used as a lead image on en.wp. Steven Walling 16:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Steven. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Mbz1 (talk) 17:21, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Hongera! Very detailed, illustrative posing. --Ikiwaner (talk) 18:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit too tight, perhaps, but otherwise great. Wolf (talk) 20:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:11, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 03:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Quartl (talk) 09:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --George Chernilevsky talk 19:39, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support JukoFF (talk) 23:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - and very appropriate that is under a GNU license ;-)) MPF (talk) 08:37, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
  • LOL:-) --Muhammad (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support   ■ MMXX  talk  06:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals

File:Cotacachi volcano.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2010 at 20:39:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

the Cotacachi volcano (Ecuador) seen from the town of Cotacachi. My camera is not the most recent one and I am no professional photographer, so please do not bite !
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Cymbiola imperialis 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2010 at 11:24:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cymbiola imperialis, Volutidae, Imperial Volute, length 21 cm, originating from Philippines.