Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

File:Dietes bicolor flower.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2012 at 14:24:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Maybe this is a different cultivar. --Citron (talk) 08:42, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks; and added to Dietes bicolor -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 09:17, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful --Schnobby (talk) 08:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice sharp water drops, I didn´t understand the generous crop at the left side, though Poco a poco (talk) 11:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Plants/Flowers

File:Diomedea epomophora portrait - SE Tasmania.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2012 at 23:16:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Southern Royal Albatross (Diomedea epomophora) portrait, East of the Tasman Peninsula, Tasmania, Australia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by JJ Harrison -- JJ Harrison (talk) 23:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JJ Harrison (talk) 23:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It seems too white for me. --Llorenzi (talk) 07:18, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- I agree with Llorenzi though gull's feathers are ... white. Strictly is not even blown but the body of the animal shows almost no detail, probably due to flat lighting. Another symptom is undersaturation: the colors are washed out. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:17, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 13:35, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Body has low detail. -- JDP90 (talk) 15:58, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Füssen - Klosterkirche St. Mang24.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2012 at 13:32:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Frescos at St. Mang Basilica Füssen, main fresco is showing the death of Magnus of Füssen
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 13:32, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 13:32, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I find it a pity that the four columns don't sit square in the frame. Rotating the picture slightly would solve that. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 16:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
    • I have tried to correct this. New version uploaded. --Wladyslaw (talk) 16:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Symmetry is still not absolutely perfect, but I like this picture very much (exceptional sharpness and uniform light, IMO), and especially the trompe-l'oeil of the Devil.--Jebulon (talk) 09:48, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 13:21, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 19:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:50, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - A.Savin 08:04, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:58, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 19:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:Haetosmia male 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2012 at 13:05:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Haetosmia vechti, male
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Gidip (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gidip (talk) 13:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like it, even the depth of focus. But it's below the ”minimum” resolution. --Ximonic (talk) 16:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
It's actually above 2 mpx, if that's what you mean. Gidip (talk) 16:15, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Weak support O'h... Well I'm changing to weak support as I still think it's just quite smallish. --Ximonic (talk) 19:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support special. Tomer T (talk) 05:44, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm happy with the DOF in this 'special' case; the head is very prominent neglecting other parts. Can be a more generous crop on right if available; serves to increase the resolution too. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:05, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support – Excellent composition. The activity of the head and proboscis are what's important here, and it's illustrated quite nicely. SteveStrummer (talk) 21:58, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 20:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:24, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just over the needed DoF, very nice eye Poco a poco (talk) 11:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 06:21, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Tootsi jaamahoone.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2012 at 20:27:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tootsi station building (Estonia), built in 1927 (typical project from Leon Johanson).
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Iifar - uploaded by Iifar - nominated by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 20:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 20:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral It's very nice, but two issues for me: 1. (very) minor stitching errors, 2. Framing. I think author tried hard to keep the rightmost tree into the frame, but I'm not sure this brings anything. Instead, I would have put more railroad into the frame. - Benh (talk) 21:07, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support More railroad is good; but a cut on the tree will be more disturbing to me. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 03:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment More railroad was left out because of light conditions (the sky was overexposed). --Ivar (talk) 06:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 14:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:50, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 09:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 06:18, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Flowers in marble, Taj Mahal, Agra, India 1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2012 at 06:30:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flowers in marble, Taj Mahal, Agra, India
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Hic et nunc and Yann, uploaded by Hic et nunc, nominated by Yann (talk) 06:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 06:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request Maybe you could improve the symmetry of the framing...--Jebulon (talk) 09:50, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
    • The exterior frame does not exist on the right, as the structure continues to the perpendicular wall. What do you suggest? Yann (talk) 12:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
      • Maybe crop out the exterior frame (as suggested by note), and correct the perspective (and lens distortion) a little bit ?--Jebulon (talk) 09:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
        • OK, but then I will make a new nomination. Yann (talk) 09:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nominationYann (talk) 09:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:23, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Lago di Tovel 04.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2012 at 07:26:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tovel lake, an alpine lake in the province of Trento (Italy)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by llorenzi - uploaded by llorenzi - nominated by llorenzi -- Llorenzi (talk) 07:26, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llorenzi (talk) 07:26, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request -- Please correct the slanted horizon! Please... It's a fine picture and i'd hate to oppose for such an easily rectifiable flaw such as this. Kleuske (talk) 09:58, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done As requested, I corrected the horizon. --Llorenzi (talk) 11:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ximonic (talk) 13:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stryn (talk) 15:50, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 20:20, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too harsh shadow for me. Tomer T (talk) 21:49, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Shadow is OK to me, the composition I like as well, but the mountains lack sharpness - too small F-number maybe? - A.Savin 22:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the half dark boat. The background is a bit out of focus. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC) P.S. please take a look to my user page ;-)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per alchemist. Don't like how the boat lies in the shadow, de-emphasizing it while it should give an anchor point to the viewer instead. Also few stitching issues (Mentioning it's a stitched image is welcomed). - Benh (talk) 13:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per alchemist. --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:16, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Set nomination:Synahlonia on Phlomis, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2012 at 15:58:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Gidip (talk) 15:58, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gidip (talk) 15:58, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment All images are now resized to 65% of their original size. Should have done this from the start. Gidip (talk) 06:39, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting series. But I don't know whether it is better to select the best one to feature and include the others as 'other versions' under description. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:00, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 10:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Boloria aquilonaris, Hochmoor Perlmuttfalter 13.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2012 at 21:14:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boloria aquilonaris, Hochmoor Perlmuttfalter
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Boloria aquilonaris, Hochmoor Perlmuttfalter all by -- Böhringer (talk) 21:14, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:14, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- This is a marvelous picture Böhringer, congratulations! I will support it one way or the other but maybe it could be improved by: (i) removing the blown parts of the leaves, e.g. by cloning; (2) cropping a bit on the sides. What I like more is the pattern of the scales on the wings, which is very detailed and sharp. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:13, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think it's the Nth "butterfly mating" FP candidate, and the lighting is a tad harsh. Also we don't really see the mating process (making it suitable for wide audience for sure). But very nice setting and superb composition to me. - Benh (talk) 13:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Are they actually mating? - Benh (talk) 13:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
ja, ich habe noch andere Bilder davon. --Böhringer (talk) 14:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral -- Highly competitive with the other image available. More resolution and wings more detailed here; but the heads of both butterflies are more visible in the other. The shadows (?) seem bluish to me. I didn't understand that part and the leaf bent; is it bent by you to take the photo? (I know butterflies are very friendly during mating; and I have a shot with them on my finger. Smile) -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:53, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The picture has the disadvantages of being shot at noon, with harsh light on the leaf and harsh shadows on the butterflies' heads. We cannot tell these creatures when to mate... but perhaps a fill flash would have reduced the shadows on the heads. Gidip (talk) 10:44, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:32, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice shot, IMO too much space left on the right, there is a strange spot just below the right guy (image editing error? I added a note) and the left guy is not really sharp, Poco a poco (talk) 11:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks better now, thanks for the initiative Alchemist Poco a poco (talk) 14:24, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and ✓ Done: some dust spots removed and the editing error corrected. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
vielen Dank :-)) --Böhringer (talk) 20:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Stained Glass Window.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2012 at 18:37:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Stained Glass Window
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info designed by Richard Morris Hunt (1827-1895), made by Eugène Stanislas Oudinot (1827-1889), this stained glass window was created for the Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Window 1883-1884. The window is part of the permanent exhibition of the Museum of the City of New York (Photo, edit, and upload by me) -- PierreSelim (talk) 18:37, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PierreSelim (talk) 18:37, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 21:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 21:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Added category Trompe l'oeil of which it's a wonderfull example. Had me fooled at first glance. Kleuske (talk) 09:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
    I wasn't sure if it was considered a Trompe l'oeil. Thanks for improving the Categorization of this file. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Huh sorry to oppose again, but any reason we have the cropped and altered version instead of the original one with the complete context? - Benh (talk) 13:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
    First don't be sorry, reviews are essential in the FP process otherwise we just !vote without comment. The original one, is the display context of the museum, I decided to only keep the central part of the artwork (the stained glass window) and remove the window which was too distracting because we could see the window of the museum behind. Note that this window was made for another build (which do not exist anymore). May be my choice is not good, but really I don't think we miss so much with this choice. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I think the context amplifies how good the effect is (by giving element for comparing), but I also see your point. Moved my vote to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral after thinking about it again. - Benh (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The Trompe l'oeil effect is amazing. Yann (talk) 16:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:27, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I had supported it without any mental restriction if I had not seen the uncropped picture, but I cannot say I disagree with Benh. However, we have to "judge" what the author chose to show, and it is very good and interesting as it is. Congratulations.--Jebulon (talk) 09:18, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: with or without context. --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:36, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I didn´t really catch my eye at thumb size but it is great at 100% Poco a poco (talk) 11:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:49, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

File:Seebrücke Sellin nordöstlicher Teil.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2012 at 14:56:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

northeastern part of Sellin pier


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Oryctes nasicornis male 2012 G1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2012 at 05:56:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European Rhinoceros Beetle male


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:12, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Viljandi vana veetorn.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2012 at 14:10:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Ivar -- Ivar (talk) 14:10, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 14:10, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Halos around the tower. -- King of ♠ 22:12, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • the halo is not significant IMO, but the dark trees on the left are disturbing me --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:00, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 06:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Ardpur3.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2012 at 11:56:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds

File:Sierra Nevada de Merida, Loma Redonda.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2012 at 02:00:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Venezuela,  4045 meters
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Wilfredor - uploaded by Wilfredor - nominated by Wilfredor -- Wilfredor (talk) 02:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wilfredor (talk) 02:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I like the composition and lighting. On the other side, there are halos on some plants, the postion of the donkeys doesn't feel right to me (tilt or perspective correction may be needed) and I would increase saturation a bit Poco a poco (talk) 11:26, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
The perspective looks like in reality, please, could you clarify that point a little.(Voy a intentar corregir lo otro, lo tendré en mente para el futuro) thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 22:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 13:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination You were right Poco a poco, I have reviewed several photos and apparently the error was generated by combining photos with hugin, however, I do not know how to fix this. Yann Thank you very much for your vote. Wilfredor (talk) 14:20, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Strawberry Fields Forever.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2012 at 14:49:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

John Lennon's Strawberry Fields Forever Memorial
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:Damzow - uploaded by User:Damzow - nominated by User:Damzow -- Damzow (talk) 14:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Damzow (talk) 14:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice composition Tomer T (talk) 21:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment no one else is going to state his opinion? Tomer T (talk) 19:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great composition, but, sadly, sharpness is lacking. Kleuske (talk) 14:01, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Kleuske Poco a poco (talk) 11:15, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Boy Face from Venezuela.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2012 at 12:42:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boy Face from Venezuela


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: People

File:Brick wall close-up view.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2012 at 08:28:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brick wall close-up view
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Peter23 - uploaded by Peter23 - nominated by Alborzagros -- Alborzagros (talk) 08:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 08:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 16:47, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Harsh lighting. Garish colours. Unweathered so no character. Rather thick mortar and not a bond pattern I've ever seen (hence very low EV). The left hand side is out of focus. Colin (talk) 18:03, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Conejo común (Oryctolagus cuniculus), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-06-17, DD 03.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2012 at 13:28:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Munich, Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Amirki -- Amirki (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Amirki (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 16:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 00:44, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 03:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:53, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Isn't it sweet? :) Poco a poco (talk) 22:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - A.Savin 08:01, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose don't want to play the grinch, but "cute animal(s)" is not a sufficient argument for a featured picture. The front legs are not visible good and this image has nothing special for me, it is for sure a QI, but not a FP --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Wladyslaw.--Jebulon (talk) 14:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice is not necessarily featurable. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose: Noise in Blurry areas and per Wladyslaw. --Julian H. (talk/files) 09:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No Wow effect. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:45, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Stas1995 (talk) 09:57, 2 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Image:Mokoli'i islet Chinaman's Hat.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2012 at 17:58:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mokoliʻi islet, Oahu (Hawaii)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tonchino - uploaded by Tonchino - nominated by Tonchino -- Tonchino 17:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tonchino 17:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice. Tomer T (talk) 18:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stryn (talk) 19:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Apart from the leaf on the left, the large ground area isn't good for the composition, in my opinion. --Julian H. (talk/files) 07:28, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Corrected about the leaf, thanks for viewing --Tonchino 21:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with Julian's comment, too much ground Poco a poco (talk) 10:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:55, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Lake Kinney mit Mount Whitehorn.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2012 at 13:08:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kinney Lake and Mount Whitehorn near Mount Robson
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting branches at bottom and left. Contrast is a tad high as well. 178.36.3.245 20:49, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
IP are not allowed to vote (account with more than 10 days and 50 contribs needed, see general rules number 4). As the review might still be interesting I'm letting it here, only striking the oppose. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done new version with higher resolution and no branches uploaded, --Florian Fuchs (talk) 06:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Can you remove the CA? -- -donald- (talk) 07:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Chromatische Aberration. If you have used RAW-Files the RAW-Converter has an option for this. -- -donald- (talk) 09:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done new version without CA uploaded --Florian Fuchs (talk) 11:15, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural

File:Graue Wulstling Amanita excelsa.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2012 at 11:56:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Young Amanita excelsa
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by H. Krisp -- H. Krisp (talk) 11:56, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 13:00, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose: Low color contrast to cluttered background prevents wow, in my opinion. --Julian H. (talk/files) 18:09, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination--H. Krisp (talk) 18:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Albatros1 Wiki.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2012 at 15:46:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Albatros D.V, Paul Bäumer, Jasta 5, 1917
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The picture shows the Albatros D.V of Leutnant Paul Bäumer, who was credited with 43 aerial victories in WWI. He flew this aircraft at Jasta 5 in July and August 1917, showing an individual Edelweiss-marking. The image was created using CorelDraw 11 and Photoshop 6 and is based on original WWI photo material. - created by B. Huber - uploaded by B. Huber - nominated by B. Huber -- B. Huber (talk) 15:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- B. Huber (talk) 15:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Little issue to be corrected: when one click on this thumbnail above, one can see a different picture...--Jebulon (talk) 16:39, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Another little issue... Are the markings/decorations historic? If so, could you provide details on the "geschwader" and such? Kleuske (talk) 14:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
      • Of course the markings are historic! It took me quite a while to figure them out, based on WWI-pictures and a lot of discussion with WWI-experts preceds all of my drawings. The aircraft shows the OAW-built Albatros D.V of Paul Bäumer, Jasta 5 who was credited with 43 aerial victories - therefore it has the bright grey coloured primer on the metal parts. Based on original pictures the fuselage was not black - as shown in most older drawings, including earlier versions of my own drawing - but a two-coloured section. The colours i show are the most probable variant. B. Huber (talk) 15:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
        • Great. Could you mention that in the image description? I think it would be of interest to our readers. Kleuske (talk) 15:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
    • The issue mentioned above by me is still here...--Jebulon (talk) 14:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • It seems that the kind of images i create are not appreciated at Wikipedia. This is my second attempt here and the response has always been very poor. I invest a lot of time and effort in creating these images at the highest standards to provide Wikipedia with historical correct images but if they are completely ignored by the community it might be better for me to stop doing so. B. Huber (talk) 09:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Please be patient, only three days have passed and we are still in the silly season (August). I find your illustrations of very high quality and we certainly need this kind of media in Commons and in ... the FP gallery. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I fully agree with Alvesgaspar. Please notice that there is no oppose vote for the moment. Be patient and don't withdraw. As for me, here in "Commons" (not "Wikipedia"...) your work is great, necessary, useful and highly apreciated. I'm very interested. I'd support this kind of picture with a great enthousiasm and no doubt, if the issue mentionned above were corrected (you did not answer nor correct...). Come on !--Jebulon (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Good and interesting, but this should be in PNG to get featured. Yann (talk) 05:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Again: Could you please explain why the section of the fuselage with the edelweiss and the iron cross is BLACK (and not violet and red) when one click on the picture ?--Jebulon (talk) 14:48, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
    • This is a serious problem of uploading new versions of the same file - and that's just what i did a few ays before i nominated this image. In my experience it takes many days until only the current versions is visible - don't ask me why, maybe it is a problem of the different national server and their communication. Unfortunately there is nothing i can do about it. B. Huber (talk) 19:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks good now. Very good job. Could you maybe "translate" it in SVG ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info added now as an illustration of the "Paul Bäumer" article in the french WP--Jebulon (talk) 23:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:06, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 17:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 08:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Spuller See Panorama von Westen.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2012 at 21:11:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spuller See Panorama
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Spuller See Panorama all by -- Böhringer (talk) 21:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But what happens to me ? I'm on the way to support boring mountain panorama pictures since some days... Well, this one is really very nice and sharp, I love that light, and wish to see this "in real"... (shame of the wire though)--Jebulon (talk) 23:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as Jebulon. Yann (talk) 05:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 06:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: Light is not perfect, but everything else is. -- Julian H. (talk/files) 07:48, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 07:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing! --Stryn (talk) 10:47, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--David1010 05:42, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Itemirus (talk) 07:44, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maire (talk) 10:36, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--alex.vonbun (talk) 08:42, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 23:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC) wow


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Cape Verde Pico do Fogo caldeira road.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2012 at 10:56:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cape Verde, island of Fogo: road towards Chã das Caldeiras in the caldeira of the volcano Pico do Fogo.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Cayambe - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 10:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - A.Savin 19:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice composition, valuable and aesthetic --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 07:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 21:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Thank you Tomer for your interest in this image. Thanks also to the supporters. --Cayambe (talk) 07:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pair of Merops apiaster feeding.jpg

File:Puente Don Luis I, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 13.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2012 at 11:48:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

King Luis I bridge, Porto, Portugal
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 11:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support this view of th D.Luis I Bridge, and city of Porto, Portugal -- Jebulon (talk) 11:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support outstanding illustration of an amazing bridge --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes! Kleuske (talk) 14:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 16:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:47, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the shadow. Tomer T (talk) 19:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Actually I think that the picture does not capture a little portion of the beauty of that place Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 20:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:16, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support top --Böhringer (talk) 10:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • (weak) Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose great view, no question, and the bridge shdow is nice; but I really don't like the crop (cut off bridge on the left, cut off roofs and bridge pier at bottom). --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request please avoid the use of the "weak" oppose (or "weak" support) templates, as discussed previously for an another picture, it is confusing for the bot, and makes the final count false. According to the rules, please use only the valid templates, thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 21:11, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very eye catching view of a very beautiful bridge. I'm also a fan of the shadow. I'd try to fix the brightness level on left side from the RAW (I'll try tonight on the Jpeg), but it's personal taste issue. - Benh (talk) 16:42, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info What I meant by "fixing left side" : [1], if author is interested, it would be better to work on the RAW itself. - Benh (talk) 21:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I have uploaded a new version following your advice. I think that it is definitely an improvement and not a matter of tastes, therefore I didn't open a parallel nomination Poco a poco (talk) 16:34, 1 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

Image:2012-07-27 Aussicht Toblinger Knoten.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2012 at 16:40:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The photo shows a 360-degree view from Toblinger nodes near the Three Peaks. The photo was assembled from 12 individual shots.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Je-str - uploaded by Je-str - nominated by Je-str -- Je-str (talk) 16:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Je-str (talk) 16:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stryn (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice view, but image has multiple issues (retouching problems on the sky, big stitching error (cropped man on the right), purple CA, overexposed clouds). --Ivar (talk) 18:49, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Almost just for getting up there... nice labeling, adding a lot of value... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:13, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llorenzi (talk) 12:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose hopelessly oversharpned. JPG artifacts (certainly because of the camera and post-processing), low details, disturbing shadows, blown parts, chromatic aberrations. Stitching errors. Posterization. I'm not sure if the users above took a look in the full resolution of the image... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, per Carschten. Not only overexposured clouds but also hills. —DerHexer (Talk) 13:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose: Heavy oversharpening, noise (resulting from oversharpening), artifacts, stitching errors and other problems. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose: Stunning Picture, but sadly absolutly oversharpend. Could you upload a better version? --Martin Kraft (talk) 10:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done --Je-str (talk) 18:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Teignmouth MMB 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2012 at 21:41:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Deckchairs blowing in the wind at Teignmouth.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Mattbuck - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The bottom crop is distracting. The composition in general seems a bit unbalanced. -- King of ♠ 23:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 12:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Perhaps you should let the nomination run for more than half a day. Maybe this wouldn't get FP but the reviews might be useful to the photographer and encouraging/provoking. I thought the crop was fine and captured the sweep of the wall from bottom-left to the right. The blowing chairs in a line are an interesting image. What loses support for me is the busy background and the lack of seaside context other than the chairs. If a beach or the sea formed a background, it would be more effective. Colin (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Rivière Matamec 2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2012 at 12:59:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Matamec river
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 12:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cephas (talk) 12:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't want to sound to rude to a contributor as skilled as you... but to me that's a no wow. I think composition and lighting could be better (looks taken at noon), and that flow of water shouldn't be frozen like that (longer exposure time would have yield better sense of movement for me). - Benh (talk) 20:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for me a very good composition, fantastic light incl. wow factor. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 06:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - A.Savin 19:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do like the composition, the lighting could be better, but the big problem I see here is the lack of sharpness overall Poco a poco (talk) 10:46, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I think the light, the composition, the colors, are very good, but per Poco a poco, the sharpness is so-so, in my opinion. I don't think "frozen water" looks like this in real, and the sense of movement is here enough for me. For my taste, a longer exposure for water gives only an ugly motion blur (with exceptions). Matter of taste, indeed...--Jebulon (talk) 14:44, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The early afternoon light makes the colors slightly dull, and there is CA and unsharpness on the trees, especially on the sides. -- King of ♠ 21:46, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Breisacher Munster Hochaltar (Detail).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2012 at 09:03:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Breisach Minster high altar detail (Mary's coronation and God the Father)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Wladyslaw. This picture shows the detail of a high altar that was made in the 16. century. The chief motive is Mary's coronation and God the Father. -- Wladyslaw (talk) 09:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 09:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it. Tomer T (talk) 12:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, but random cut = missing a composition, strong and distracting shadows, unfavorable light. More important will be your whole work: File:Breisacher Munster Hochaltar.jpg. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:48, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
    the cut is not random but focused on the main motive of the altar, I can't see distracting shadows (distracting would mean that important parts would be bad visbible, which important parts are so?) as well but a nice malleable impression --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:59, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
    "I'm sorry, I don't remember asking you for your opinion." Here is simply my opinion at the FP page for all. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:05, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
    Sorry, but I don't need a permession to clarify that this image is showing the most important part of the altar. On the other hand you are setting up a theory (distracting shadows) which I question because it is not comprehensible for me. If you like you can answer my question so maybe I can improve the parts that are really distracting. But I can't see such parts. Thank you. --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
    A discussion with you is still pointless. You can accept my opinion or not, that is only your problem. My best hint: take a new image with better light. Bye. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
    Maybe you shouldn't vote here if you have a serious problem that your opinion could be asked. As you are not willing to anwser my question we all could think ourselves how intense your "opinion" is. --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:42, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
    Sorry but I'm not your teacher for "how I make a better image", without photographic problems. If you are not open for valid criticism than please don't show us your images. Perhaps it is only one oppose for this image. Good luck. And I remember the de:FP side. For me EOD. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
    It has nothing to do with being a teacher to ask a point that I didn't see. I do not ask for lessons but for explanation of a global not specific argument made by you. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
    You're welcome. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:13, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose: Unlevel (rotate ccw), arbitrary crop. -- Julian H. (talk/files) 16:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
    please explain why the main object which is Cultural-historical most important should be an arbitrary crop. the slight rotation is needed is easy fixed. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
    I can't evaluate the Cultura-historical importance, so when the rotation is corrected, I will change my vote to neutral. --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A featurable picture is not necessarily a good picture in the sense that it appeals to the sense of aesthetics or that it is executed with all the lights, bells and whistles of photographic technique. This picture is pretty decent from the technical point of view considering the circumstances. Yes, it has shadows, but the shadows are precisely what give this image texture that reveals the intricacy of the work. The lighting may not be the best, but I think that studio lighting would be pretty hard, considering the logistics of the site. So the best that we can hope for is a good image that describes visually the subject matter, and in this case, even with the crop (you always have to crop something), it is pretty informative in many ways, which is the objective of Commons, to gather images that illustrate, register, capture, etc., etc., material for use in other projects. I am sure that many scholars would find this image extremely valuable. It may not be pretty, exciting, but it informs. It has value. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Brilliant crop; I checked all the angels on the edges. The only problem for me is the shadow on top left. (May be a different crop possible including the Son (while seeing the whole work); but it is a different choice. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the crop (Jesus and the figures feet are cut off), and the low angle of view (emphasises the stabilising structure in the top left and the shadows). These shadows are really hard but IMO tolarable considering the available light conditions. Maybe you're better of at Commons:VIC --Martin Kraft (talk) 07:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bad lighting towards bottom of picture, cropped too far, and slightly skewed. Lwebdan (talk) 11:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC) // voting not valid, cf. rules, very peculiar that users appear here after years of inactivity --Wladyslaw (talk) 12:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Have to agree the crop reduces the value of this image. If this were a continuous or vast display then I could understand having to crop somewhere rather arbitrary. But chopping Christ out of a Christian alter is rather an unusual approach and it seems to me the three figures are equally important in the scene. Any featured image here would surely be the whole alter. Crops of parts of the scene may be useful for commentary in an article, but not in themselves feature-worthy imo. Colin (talk) 17:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
    • sorry, but please have a look at the full altar. There is not Christ figure so Christ was not croped out. Maybe you make a conscientious investigation next time. And the argument why a detail picture could not get a FP is not comprehensible for me because we have many examples which refute your theory. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
      • Taxiarchos228 claims the figure on the LHS (cropped out but visible in the full scene linked above) is not Christ. Well this website tells us "The center shrine shows an astonishingly lifelike depiction of the crowning of Mary. God the Father and Christ hold a crown, beautifully decorated with blossoms and angels playing music, high over Mary's head. The Holy Ghost is symbolized by a dove hovering above the crown." Another website says "Coronation of Saint Mary, main altar, 1523-1526. Signed by an unidentified Master "H.L." Saint Mary between God-Father and Christ, the Holy Ghost above her crown. Left the deacons Saint Stephen and Laurence, right the city patrons Protasius and Gervasius." (the left and right here referring to the side panels, also cropped out). This schematic shows the location of Jesus Christ, Mary and God the Father. The German Wikipedia page goes into detail on the figure of Christ saying (via Google Translate) "The representation of Christ is far less restrained. He also appears with a royal crown and scepter. Sweeping hair and a beard frame a gekrauster his face. His gaze, but his whole body is facing Mary. His deep drooping robe boils over his body and held in place by a double cord. At the same time you can see below the bare chest deep spear at his side." But look, the detail crop next to this article text doesn't show Christ. I did my homework before reviewing this article. Both Christ and God the Father jointly crown Mary in this scene. It is absolutely essential that Christ figures in any featurable depiction of this work. I think I and several other reviewers are owed an apology both for the ill-thought-out nomination and the ill-tempered response to review comments.. Colin (talk) 20:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
        • Indeed: I mixed this altar up with an other. The figure is Jesus. The german article and the schematic image was written/ made by me years ago. Jesus is important for the christian religion but the figure of Jesus Christ has not the same importance in cultural reception in art over the thousands of years. This picture shows a piece of art which is a Marienaltar (Mary's altar). This means the main figure of presentation and even of worship is Mary. Jesus and even Godfather has iconographicly just a supporting role. This you can see very clearly because Jesus and God are carved below of Mary, actually God and Jesus are looking up to her and she is not kneeing but well dressed and the absolute center of this event. So why Godfather and Mary and not Jesus and Mary or the three altogether? Three figures would take the dramatic and aesthetic content. God and Mary are facing each other, so my choose was to picture this interaction of this both figures. To put Jesus to an importance that he has definitely not means ignoring the cultural history facts. It's not blemish not to know this important details of the picture but it's a blemish to insist on points that are not reproducing the matter of facts. Therefore this candidature is closed. --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
          • The reduction of central compositioned scenery (with Marie surounded by the trinity) to a bipolar composition (with just Marie an God father) alters the meaning and icongraphy intended by the 16th century artist. Therefore it's this arbitrary cut that ignores 'cultural history facts' for some 'dramatic and aesthetic' reasons (I don't approve). --Martin Kraft (talk) 07:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
            • The reduction of this both figures is owed to the fact that the the artist has chosen this both figures facing each other. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
              • Mary is not looking down at God the Father. Her head is tilted slightly that way, as though she is listening to him, but she's looking ahead/up, at the crown perhaps. As Martin states, the whole trinity is represented here (with the Holy Spirit above). You're entitled to your opinion that Mary/God are the two most important figures and we are entitled to ours that the scene requires all four figures to function correctly. Claiming our opinion is a "blemish" and that we are ignorant (wrt Christ figuring) when in fact we are correct is just plain rude. Colin (talk) 09:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
                I didn't said that Mary is looking down to Godfahther, I said they are facing each other because they do so. Please do not interpret clear facts as you thinks best. And the rest of your theory is definitely wrong. You can read all relevant of this altar in Uwe Fahrer et al. (Bearb.), Münsterpfarrei St. Stephan Breisach (Hrsg.): Das Breisacher Münster. Schnell & Steiner. Regensburg 2005, ISBN 3-7954-1649-3, page 44 til 48. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
                • Well she's not facing him either. For comparison, he is facing her. Quite different. She is facing the front both in terms of her body and her head. Her head is titled at an angle to one one side but is still facing forwards. This really is the most silly discussion I've had all week. Colin (talk) 13:47, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
@Colin: Don't waste your time: Wladyslaw will neither accept his obvious misconception nor apologise for his imputations. Somebody who continues to claim all the 'clear facts' for himself, after beeing proved wrong already, won't take any criticism at all. --Martin Kraft (talk) 14:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
                • Of course it is silly, because you're denying obvious facts, even those that are readable in the cited book. --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:03, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
<ironie>Of course, literature clearly states, that the only reasonable way to photograph this altar is to cut off two thirds of the trinity, because it is only about this two characters and everything else is just, what the artist did in his spare time.</ironie>Come on: this is nonsense and you know that! --Martin Kraft (talk) 15:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
The theory was: is Jesus so important that this figure can not be cropped out. This theory is demonstrably false. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination it's a pity to candidate pictures where a few expert knowledge is required and those "experts" demonstrate their lack of knowledge --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Isn't it a bit ignorant to blame us for incompetence, while you yourself negated at least one of the major characters in this altar - cutting away 2/3 of the holy trinity? --Martin Kraft (talk) 07:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
      • I already explained. It's not necessary to start a second discussion. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is both epic and rather amusing. It also highlights everything that is wrong with this project. 131.137.245.209 13:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Uses who are not brave enough to log in and write their opinion using their real name? Is something wrong with the project or just with single users? I believe Commons is more than a loose collection of users. Regarding the candidate, it's of very fine quality but you ask people for their opinion here and these may be influenced by various things, even their current mood. -- Rillke(q?) 15:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Märkisches Museum Berlin - stained glass window.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2012 at 07:54:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Märkisches Museum Berlin - stained glass window
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--David1010 05:38, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think it needs an horizontal perspective correction Poco a poco (talk) 07:27, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
    • In my opinion pespective is OK --Pudelek (talk) 09:08, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
      • The distance between the bars in the left side is shorter, do you suggest that the stained glass is like that? Poco a poco (talk) 14:18, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Pudelek (talk) 22:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Bastille, August 2012.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2012 at 00:24:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by getfunky_paris (Flickr) - uploaded & nominated by Paris 16 (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 00:24, 3 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /King of ♠ 05:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Diesellokomotive MaK G 320 B ex mit Museumszug .jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2012 at 19:34:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Diesellokomotive MaK G 320 B ex mit Museumszug


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /King of ♠ 05:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Lake Agnes im Banff National Park.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2012 at 14:11:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lake Agnes and Mount Whyte in Banff National Park

*Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lwebdan (talk) 11:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC) User can't vote I think. This user has only 13 edits since October 2008 (50 edits needed to vote in FPC). Another vote of this user is cancelled at a nomination above. -- JDP90 (talk) 13:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural

File:Nakhl-Minoo.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2012 at 12:19:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Palm and sunset in Minoo Island (Persian Gulf)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:17, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Noyabaad Mosque (5).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2012 at 18:48:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A historical mosque located at Dinajpur, Bangladesh, built on 1793 AD.
✓ Done --Wilfredor (talk) 02:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love this image. Om Sri Sai Ram! --Wilfredor (talk) 02:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ggia (talk) 13:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /King of ♠ 05:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:RAF Eurofighter Typhoon.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2012 at 12:52:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eurofighter Typhoon at RIAT '12
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Peter Gronemann - uploaded by Flickr upload bot - nominated by Julian H. (talk/files) 12:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: I really like the composition of this shot and considering the difficulty of these long-distance shots, I also find the quality to be good enough to be featured. -- Julian H. (talk/files) 12:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not usually a fan of military equipment, but this is a stunning picture. Kleuske (talk) 16:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The crop is maybe not the best but FP anyhow Poco a poco (talk) 16:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 18:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I find the angle of the plane with the crop somewhat awkward. A square crop maybe? --Cephas (talk) 12:44, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Stunning, I think the composition gives the feeling of the movement of the aircraft. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:18, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /King of ♠ 05:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2012 at 21:42:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stanford Memorial Church at night


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Tiger-2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2012 at 22:33:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swimming tiger in Dortmund zoological garden
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Hans Stieglitz - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 22:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 22:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Oversharpening, strange composition (a lot of space on the bottom, very little on top). --Julian H. (talk/files) 07:55, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'd probably increase saturation a bit and -if available- reduce the crop in the bottom to show the reflex on the water Poco a poco (talk) 11:21, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --H. Krisp (talk) 09:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Though it would look much better with less cropping at the bottom IMO. Maire (talk) 10:45, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request Subspecies info needed. I saw is is listed as 'Malayan Tiger' at [2]. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:41, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /King of ♠ 05:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals

File:Two-wheel tractor and harvesting potatoes.ogv, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2012 at 19:31:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /King of ♠ 05:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Val-d'Orcia-landscape-1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2012 at 02:32:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Val d'Orcia, Tuscany, Italy: Countryside road lined with cypress trees in the summer months.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Hans A. Rosbach - nominated by Raoli -- raul (talk) 02:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- raul (talk) 02:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral: It's really close to an excellent image, but the composition is a little weird with the top of the tree being cut off and the left area somehow feeling too narrow (not sure why, though). Also has some CA on the bottom and the sharpness isn't perfect. --Julian H. (talk/files) 11:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Julian H.'s arguments, but I think the cut off of the tree is really too unfortunate. To me, it is sufficient for a "decline" vote, as it seems that another composition was possible to avoid this issue (less ground at bottom = more tree at top). Sorry. Though not far to an excellent image indeed.--Jebulon (talk) 14:29, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Unfortunately I haven't found a picture of the same landscape that has a better cut. The image is a typical summer Tuscan landscape with hills and cypresses. Raoli ✉ (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm the author of the picture. I think it is good, and I like it, but I don't think it is excellent. In fact I returned to the same place, I think it was a year later, hoping to improve on this shot, just the way Jebulon indicates. I would probably have made an attempt to include more of the field at the left too. I could however, not even have made this one at that time. I have made an attempt at cropping this just above the second tree, and just below the bottom of the first, but I'm not convinced. Haros (talk) 06:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You could use other shots of the same picture to make it better. Perhaps, merging multiple photos can bring in something nicer. Raoli ✉ (talk) 09:45, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The cro is not convincing, and impo the picture is not that sharp. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /King of ♠ 05:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Siganus corallinus Brest.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2012 at 21:19:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Fish

File:Unknown soldier, 1945, war cemetery near Unkel, Germany.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2012 at 11:29:42
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grave of an unknown soldier near Unkel and, across the rive Rhine Remagen.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Kleuske, Image cropped and renominated. -- Kleuske (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain -- Kleuske (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 14:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:42, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't see the "wow" factor. -- King of ♠ 00:14, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
    • The "wow" (if you can call it that) is in the place and the date. Kleuske (talk) 22:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Nave of Basilica Saint-Sernin - 2012-08-24.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2012 at 14:56:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nave of Basilica Saint-Sernin in Toulouse, France.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by PierreSelim - nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 14:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Outstanding view (to me !) of the interior (the nave) of the Saint-Sernin Basilica in Toulouse, France, by PierreSelim -- Jebulon (talk) 14:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: Excellent indeed. --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:15, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice shot (in spite of not being 100% symmetric, as you always advocate :) ) Poco a poco (talk) 15:25, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes, I like symmetry (like in words "poco a poco", for instance), but there is no rule without exceptions, that's salt of life Clin--Jebulon (talk) 16:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
      • Architect more than photograph would be faulty for the symmetry issue ;) - Benh (talk) 16:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There's a déjà vu feeling, and I don't think it's a coincidence. Looks sharper than mine, but isn't as wide on top. - Benh (talk) 16:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
    Effectively it's not, and mine is far for being perfect. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:25, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
    • Sorry I did not remember this story, my nomination was entirely free, only because I liked this picture very much.--Jebulon (talk) 19:21, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
      • If I had to "aim" at someone, it would be more Pierre than Jebulon (sorry Pierre) so don't be sorry Jebulon. But well if people like it... And I should have uploaded mine anyways instead of "complaining". - Benh (talk) 21:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 07:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Heavy perspective distortions, unfortunate crop. Kleuske (talk) 09:47, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice for me -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 07:31, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 23:02, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Moustachioed Womanizer (talk) 13:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors

File:Windflower-05237-nevit.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2012 at 12:43:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Effect of different shutter speeds on photograph. In photography, shutter speed is a common term used to discuss exposure time, the effective length of time a camera's shutter is open. Slower shutter speeds are often selected to suggest movement in a still photograph of a moving subject. Fast shutter speeds freeze a moving subject on photograph.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Nevit - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 12:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The fans are right leaning and their centers are not alienated. Slightly out of focus. If this is corrected, I would change my vote --Wilfredor (talk) 12:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The lack of alignment does not bother me (it's a playful subject, after all). The lack of sharpness does. Kleuske (talk) 22:47, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think it's unsharp, but please do fix the rotation. -- King of ♠ 17:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 12:29, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Drottningholm palace August 2012.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2012 at 09:02:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Drottningholm Palace, August 2012.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 09:02, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:02, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question This is a WLM picture. Wouldn't it be fair for all other participants to wait until the contest is over and the jury has decided? - A.Savin 10:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
    • I am the chairman of the Swedish jury and all my pictures are therefore disqualified from winning a prize in WLM in Sweden.--ArildV (talk) 10:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
OK sorry, didn't notice. - A.Savin 10:57, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
The area between the fountain and the castle is not open to the public.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition is just off-center. I would prefer either perfectly centered or very off-center. -- King of ♠ 22:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
A perfectly centered position is not possible. There is a huge fountain in the way.--ArildV (talk) 22:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Change to Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral. -- King of ♠ 00:12, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think, it needs a slight tilt correction Poco a poco (talk) 07:25, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Thank your. Im not sure, CW or CCW?--ArildV (talk) 08:04, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
      • The correction should be in the CCW direction, to see it, open the picture in full size and scroll it so that the banister is close to one of the edges of your monitor, Poco a poco (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
        • Could you add a image note? I cant see it. As far as I can see, all the vertical lines are straight.--ArildV (talk) 14:41, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 07:30, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I uploaded a new version, tilt and a small stiching error correted.--ArildV (talk) 12:04, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tilt got better, nice shot Poco a poco (talk) 21:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment the green foreground looks really oversaturated. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose oversaturated --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:59, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 19:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 21:38, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:HD 189733b's atmosphere.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2012 at 10:05:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

HD 189733b's atmosphere
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info: created by NASA, uploaded and nominated by Stas1995 10:05, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Stas1995 (talk) 15:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A lot of "wow" factor here. -- King of ♠ 22:21, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose non scientific idealization --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

File:HailuogouGlacierPanorama.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2012 at 13:19:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hailuogou Glacier at Tibet, China.


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Panopea generosa.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2012 at 15:01:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Snigger. 46.227.232.100 19:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Non valid vote. Please log in to vote, thank you.--Jebulon (talk) 23:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good catch   • Richard[®] • 18:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Snigger Kleuske (talk) 22:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose man's face is too blurry. Tomer T (talk) 15:19, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If that were me I would wish for it to be even more so! Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment lol!! Yes, but I needed a human to get the scale!!! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
        • The subject is the clam, not the guy. I would hate it if that smirk weren't in the image, though. Kleuske (talk) 22:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
          • But, if that clam do spray like this? :) -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
            • 100% real... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 12:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
              • I think consent is implicit if not explicit, but is he aware this will be all over the internet? On the lighter side, I am inclined to bring up Convergent evolution but that may be a stretch.131.137.245.206 14:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Made me laugh :) But identifiable person is an issue to me (unless he gave his consent for being published on Commons) - Benh (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • His expression clearly says that he has no problem. The only issue for me is the similarity of the clam and the spray probably made you laugh. Clin -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not convincing for featurable. --Yikrazuul (talk) 09:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Panorama from pont Saint-Pierre in Toulouse - 2012-08-31.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2012 at 06:50:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the garonne river by night in Toulouse
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me -- PierreSelim (talk) 06:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the Garonne in Toulouse just after sunset (around 9pm): From left to right we can see the Quai Lombard, the Quai de la Daurade, the Basilica Notre Dame de la Daurade, the Pont Neuf, the churche Notre Dame de la Dalbade (behind the bridge on the left side), and on the right side we can see the Hôtel Dieu, the Quai de l'Exil républicain espagnol, and a ferry wheels.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PierreSelim (talk) 06:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Not really sure about the rotation. Does it only seem wrong? --Julian H. (talk/files) 07:58, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
    This feelings might be comes from the fact the right bank of the city is below the other bank. It used to be the popular district of the city whereas the opposite bank used to be the richer districts (with the basilicas, the city hall, etc.). --PierreSelim (talk) 08:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question This is a WLM picture. Wouldn't it be fair for all other participants to wait until the contest is over and the jury has decided? - A.Savin 10:12, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It is a WLM picture indeed, but I'm out of the contest: being in the organization team in France, jury in Switzerland, and Léna is also jury in France ... well too much COI for me to contest, my pictures are with {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2012|frNO}} for this reason, the pictures are just counted in the total picture for WLM. I hope this is clear ? --PierreSelim (talk) 10:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Yes, that's fine. - A.Savin 10:56, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Paris 16 (talk) 00:36, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 17:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 22:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 23:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not a huge fan of the large blue areas, creating empty space on most of the canvas. Unbalanced composition, as already pointed out (and even though u could do nothing about it), and very dark overall, wheel put aside. - Benh (talk) 12:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 19:48, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Moustachioed Womanizer (talk) 13:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Perth CBD - Kings Park.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2012 at 05:13:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Perth CBD From Kings Park, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Khr0n0s -- 27.33.185.222 05:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 27.33.185.222 05:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support: Very impressive. Great editing, amazing light, great resolution, definitely excellent. --Julian H. (talk/files) 07:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice atmosphere --Citron (talk) 09:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 14:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--David1010 05:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit of a surreal feeling, especially viewed at large size. -- King of ♠ 05:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 07:32, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Paris 16 (talk) 00:36, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's very nice, but something looks wrong about the tones. It's too bright maybe, and I see haloing on the thumbnail. - Benh (talk) 16:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Benh. Looking at the intersection/cloverleaf in the centre of the image, i very much get the impression that it's la nuit americaine in reverse. The city was much darker than this image suggests. This is actually a very overexposed night-shot trying to be a day shot. Kleuske (talk) 15:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As Benh. --Karelj (talk) 19:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Benh and Kleuske. -- JDP90 (talk) 06:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For the novelness of it. I would like it if the author didn't push the HDR quite so much (haloing, strange tones, etc), but then I guess it wouldn't be novel. Badon (talk) 08:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Partly a very good and interesting photo, but the overexposed parts around the intersection ruin the picture for me. -- Achird (talk) 20:48, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Obesidade.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2012 at 13:04:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting background. Something larger than f/9 should have been used. -- King of ♠ 16:23, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - as per above. Looks like a Value Image to me but not FP. --Murdockcrc (talk) 10:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 16:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Sunset in leon guanajuato mexico.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2012 at 16:06:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunset in Leon Guanajuato, Mexico
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty sunset, but I'm not sure what value it would add. It would be better if it weren't all silhouettes. -- King of ♠ 16:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - as per above user. --Murdockcrc (talk) 10:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Foitzik Unca 6x6 2012-07-08 16-06-35.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2012 at 12:47:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Foitzik Unca 6x6
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very rare Foizik Unca 6x6 from my home town-- Berthold Werner (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 22:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: In my opinion there's just a tiny bit too much white space at the left. Could you crop the image? -- King of ♠ 23:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 08:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Pictogram voting question.svg Question EXIF showing f/0. Why is that? -- JDP90 (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Because I used an old macro lens with manual setting. It was made at f/16. --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:27, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. -- JDP90 (talk) 13:57, 5 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

File:KTZ 2TE10U Aynabulak.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2012 at 20:09:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

KTZ train 22 near Aynabulak
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 20:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Train 22 Kyzylorda - Semipalatinsk near Aynabulak, Kazakhstan. Unfortunately the railways in large parts of Kazakhstan go through boring, flat terrain; the best we could find was some hilly terrain here and there, such as this river valley.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This passenger train has 20 cars, which is way longer than what we see over here in Europe (14 cars max), and is about 550 meters long.
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 20:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice train picture. A little soft on the left, but OK. -- King of ♠ 22:23, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Good shot, but nothing spectacular here, actually that cyan color of the train is not really favourable IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 07:22, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
    Cyan is color of the flag. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support   • Richard[®] • 18:26, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 08:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 21:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles

File:Kuremaa mõisa tuuleveski.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2012 at 17:36:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Ivar -- Ivar (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A WLM image - will it actually count in the competition? - A.Savin 18:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I really don't see any problem here. QI and FP have no connection with WLM. Please read WLM rules. --Ivar 18:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
      • Donna know about the rules sorry, but in order to provide an unbiased jury decision and fairness to other WLM contributors it would make sense to wait until the national results have been published... For instance, articles taking part in the German writing contest, are not allowed to candidate for featured/good articles before winners stand firm (and yes, I must admit that even German WP sometimes has rules which make sense ;) ) For my part, I will refrain from nominating any of my WLM uploads on FPC and even on QIC for the moment (though the latter is just a quality seal, without having much to do with WOW factor etc.) - A.Savin 19:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful composition. Kleuske (talk) 22:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 08:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support lovely picture --Llorenzi (talk) 08:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 13:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:35, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice picture. --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:38, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful clouds. -- King of ♠ 17:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 21:33, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The windmill is not centered in the photo but it doesn't matter. The picture is bright, crystal clear and beautiful. --Korman (talk) 06:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If it were centered, the image would not be as good. But that's just my opinion. Kleuske (talk) 09:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
      • You're not alone. I would only prefer centered compositions for wide, symmetric buildings. -- King of ♠ 16:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Mauritius.png[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2012 at 07:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mauritius Panoramic view
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Much too small to be a FP. The minimum is 2 Mpx. Yann (talk) 07:41, 10 September 2012 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Eger castle - ruins of the romanesque basilica.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2012 at 22:35:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eger Castle - ruins of roman basilica
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 22:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 22:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Stitching error in the place I have annotated. -- King of ♠ 17:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Pudelek (talk) 19:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Aerial View - Goetheanum1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2012 at 06:29:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

aerial view of Goetheanum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Wladyslaw. This pictures shows the Goetheanum, the world center for the anthroposophical movement in Dornach, Switzerland. This aerial view allows a great view at the unique roof construction. Otherwise it is very difficult to capture. But this picture was also a challenge for the pilot who circled two times around the building and moved at the entry lane of the EuroAirport Basel-Mulhouse-Freiburg. So he had to fly very carefully and considerate. I think the result is worth seeing. -- Wladyslaw (talk) 06:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 06:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good reasons to be proud of the result indeed. Nice picture with a good light, sharp enough, good composition. Very stunning building moreover.--Jebulon (talk) 14:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good and very useful. --ArildV (talk) 15:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good work. Nice perspective. --Ximonic (talk) 15:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice perspective. Reminds me of these isometric 3D games ;) - Benh (talk) 15:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • don't know how it was cropped, but if you could add more room on the right and below, I think it would be slightly improved. - Benh (talk) 15:44, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • the reason for this crop was that I don't wanted to have an other house at the bottom of the Goetheanum. Basically I have enough material to add more room to the right and below. I will try it for myself; if its better I'll upload a new version. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PierreSelim (talk) 14:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Vernet-Battle of Hanau.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2012 at 14:54:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Battle of Hanau (30-31 October 1814)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 21:17, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Non-photographic media

File:BennyTrapp Chamaeleo chamaeleon Samos Griechenland.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2012 at 18:30:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chamaeleo chamaeleon
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Benny Trapp - uploaded by Benny Trapp - nominated by me -- Slamhound (talk) 18:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Slamhound (talk) 18:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
    • It seems you don't have enough edits to vote. 50 edits are necessary. Yann (talk) 04:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
      • You're wrong. The guidelines say "Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits." Tomer T (talk) 07:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 19:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Kleuske (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:26, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 17:26, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 04:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Reptiles

File:Calle Carabobo, Maracaibo.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2012 at 18:00:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Calle Carabobo in Maracaibo, Venezuela
I found it interesting that both poles are bent in opposite directions due to colicion with cars. It would be worthwhile to do a shortened version and again nominate? --Wilfredor (talk) 04:53, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Featurable picture IMO (with this new camera !Clin), I like the colors and it looks "new" to me. About the lamppost(s): IMO, it ADDS to the composition !--Jebulon (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support strangely i like the lamppost, too. Kleuske (talk) 16:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cool lantern! :-) --Fabian318 (talk) 13:30, 12 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:47, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Crab I.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2012 at 19:09:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crab in Venezuela (Lago Mall - Maracaibo)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by rjcastillo - uploaded by rjcastillo - nominated by rjcastillo -- Rjcastillo (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rjcastillo (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lacks detail and sharpness. The centered composition doesn't really do it for me. decltype (talk) 10:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Image not categorized (species not identified either), Blurry and noisy at full resolution (ISO 1,600). -- JDP90 (talk) 12:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dark, unappealing. -- King of ♠ 17:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Its a poor image of a crab due to the difficult angle. Nothing that the photographer could do here. --Korman (talk) 06:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- All of the above opposing reasons. -- Fotoriety (talk) 05:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Editors who have 50 edits can vote. --Ivar (talk) 05:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Im Februar 1598 an der holländischen Küste gestrandeter Walfisch.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2012 at 21:52:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Im Februar 1598 an der holländischen Küste gestrandeter Walfisch
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like the image (no wonder, i'm dutch) but there's a nasty, visible fold right down the center that puts me off. Kleuske (talk) 22:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
    • I think that the picture was published in a book that contained pictures of the events in the 1598. The picture was folded in half, because the picture was larger than the book. I have no way to remove these kink in the image. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:16, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support after reading the explanation above. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:12, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support idem. Kleuske (talk) 10:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I like this picture. I've tried to get rid of the fold and partly succeeded. My version is better but not perfect. Someone, more clever than I am, can do it, for sure. --JLPC (talk) 07:22, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Merddin Emrys at Minffordd.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2012 at 15:00:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Merddin Emrys, a Fairlie locomotive operated by the Ffestiniog Railway in Wales, seen here at Minffordd
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Peter Trimming - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 15:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 15:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Slick (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support King of ♠ 05:34, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Only 1 1/2 coaches are visible, there is -instead of a viewable coach- an information board in the foreground. At least, something of the platform is cropped and the main focus is on the right half of the picture. --Fabian318 (talk) 13:30, 12 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:47, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:2010 Utah State Capitol Salt Lake City.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2012 at 07:16:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Utah State Capitol building and grounds
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Pocksuppet1999 - uploaded by Pocksuppet1999 - nominated by Pocksuppet1999 -- Pocksuppet1999 (talk) 07:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pocksuppet1999 (talk) 07:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
    • You don't have enough edits to vote. 50 edits are necessary Yann (talk) 07:44, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not very sharp, loads of uninteresting detail (like cars) and not enough subject. Kleuske (talk) 09:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose: Just not enough subject. --Julian H. (talk/files) 11:14, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. -- King of ♠ 16:23, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Loads of detail? Not very sharp? Which is it? Follow the lines in the "uninteresting" and "not enough subject" parts. What do they lead to? Clouds, mountains, cars, leaves - they all lead to the subject. These are principles taught in the first day of art classes... Pocksuppet1999 (talk) 10:05, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
      • The word "details" has two senses: 1) objects; 2) clarity. Kleuske is saying that there are objects that affect the composition negatively, such as cars. It is not being used in the sense that the image is too clear. -- King of ♠ 17:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Obvious stitching error on left part of the building (Stitching doesn't seem to be taught in art classes ;-) ). Strange placement of the main subject also, and very poor quality. - Benh (talk) 13:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Due to the distortion, the perspective is a bit strange, but that makes it interesting imo. I also like the composition, how clouds, tree, cars etc. are quite nice arranged around the center. Unfortunately, it is too blurry, so there is at least a technical issue preventing a positive vote from me. So don't be discouraged, in general, that's a nice pic.--Taraxacum (talk) 15:32, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Elymnias hypermnestra female 2 by kadavoor.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2012 at 09:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elymnias hypermnestra race caudata, female
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Elymnias hypermnestra race caudata, female. The Common Palmfly, Elymnias hypermnestra, is a species of satyrid butterfly found in south Asia. This butterfly species is dimorphic, males and females do not look alike. Males exhibit black colored upperside forewings with small blue patches and reddish brown color on upperside hindwings, while the females mimic butterfly species of the genus Danaus. All by me. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 09:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support My first attempt to take a photo after I started posting here (FPC). Eager to know if any improvement. Smile -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 09:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. There's a leaf that's a bit distracting in the bottom left; could you blur that out? -- King of ♠ 23:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • I checked in my home computer and didn't find any color difference; so the edit is fine to me. I just used Picasa to correct the brightness only, didn't touch the colors. I don't know terms like 'color space'. Thank you for the edit and you may add it as an alt. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Actually, there's nothing "wrong" about the colors per se; they just look different on my computer and I wanted to see if that bothers you. -- King of ♠ 16:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

*Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit[edit]

Elymnias hypermnestra race caudata, female


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:26, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods
The chosen alternative is: File:Elymnias hypermnestra female 2 by kadavoor edit.jpg

File:12-06-05-aut-rom-freundschaftsspiel-103.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2012 at 19:57:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Exhibition game Austria vs. Romania at 5st. June 2012; referee Danny Makkelie (NL)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:42, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

File:12-06-05-innsbruck-by-ralfr-164.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2012 at 19:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Innsbruck Airport, Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ralf Roleček - uploaded by Ralf Roleček - nominated by Ralf Roleček 19:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ralf Roleček 19:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Slick (talk) 11:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 22:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Looks tilted to me. Is that how it's supposed to be? -- King of ♠ 18:00, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
    Yes, it is a Lens with 10mm and i was at the top of a parking house, looking bittle down, because this the picture must tilt a little bit. --Ralf Roleček 18:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
    What I mean is rotation, rather than vertical distortion. It looks too CW to me. -- King of ♠ 21:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
    sorry for my bad english. look at vertical lines (windows), they are vertical. --Ralf Roleček 21:17, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
    Hmm, I guess so. Symbol support vote.svg Support King of ♠ 00:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose no wow. Tomer T (talk) 06:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:42, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

File:The Monastery, Petra, Jordan8.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2012 at 20:26:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

El Deir (The Monastery) in the ancient city of Petra, Jordan
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info El Deir ("The Monastery") in the ancient city of Petra, Jordan. Created, uploaded and nominated by Poco a poco -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The image is sharp and clear. The picture is centered on the monastery building and the building is not lost in any sun shades at all. It is fully exposed to the sun. This is a good candidate for a featured picture. --Korman (talk) 23:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 05:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Murdockcrc (talk) 10:48, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 13:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 17:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I hate reviewing without writing anything, so I'd say subject may be a biiiiit too close to bottom border. But still very nice for me - Benh (talk) 21:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 07:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 12:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting --Wilfredor (talk) 17:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 18:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 21:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:49, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ionutzmovie (talk) 16:29, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support – On the face of it, this picture has the necessary detail and illustrative clarity to be FP, but what makes it special is the clever composition. Just the right angle gives the building a hunched appearance which, combined with the close crop, conveys the solitude of the subject. SteveStrummer (talk) 03:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:45, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Megalithic grave Harhoog in Keitum, Sylt, Germany.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2012 at 23:40:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Megalithic grave Harhoog in Keitum, Sylt, Germany.


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 07:13, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

File:Haeckel Chaetopoda-edit.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2012 at 17:48:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Haeckel Chaetopoda


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 22:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Non-photographic media

File:Antoni Gutierrez Diaz.png[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2012 at 09:00:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

portrait of Antoni Gutíerrez Díaz (1929-2006), catalan and UE parliament politician
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Too small: 2 Mpx is the minimum. Yann (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Vihula mõisa tuuleveski.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2012 at 15:33:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by --Ivar (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Not bad, but I get the feeling that this is "just another windmill picture." -- King of ♠ 16:32, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the "cleanliness" of this picture. Tomer T (talk) 17:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Not much interesting as your previous FP and this although each windmill are different and may have their own EV (I've not much knowledge about the subject). -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

File:London Zoo 01118.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2012 at 17:26:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Female Attacus atlas moth taken in UK
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Nevit - uploaded by Nevit - nominated by Danesman1 -- Danesman1 (talk) 17:26, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Danesman1 (talk) 17:26, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice exemplar, and good quality, but the crop is far too tight Poco a poco (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Disturbing background and tight; but far more detailed than the current FP and in a more natural environment. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Disturbing background and crop is too tight. -- Darius Baužys talk 16:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice, but background is a little distracting. -- King of ♠ 17:56, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As per Jkadavoor comments. --Cassianto (talk) 15:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice quality photo, very clear and detailed.--Pollycat (talk) 17:01, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
    • You dont have enough edits to vote. -- JDP90 (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Vase on the terrace of Grand Peterhof Palace.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2012 at 14:35:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An 18th century vase at the Grand Peterhof Palace, Saint Petersburg, Russia. In the background, parts of the Grand Cascade and the Sea Canal of Peterhof are visible.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Florstein, nominated by A.Savin 14:35, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - A.Savin 14:35, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Awesome colors --Martin Kraft (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 15:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 17:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roleček 23:27, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition --Wilfredor (talk) 02:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC) I changed my mind per Tomas and Benh. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 14:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This picture really is not about the vase, but of everything. The depth of field is too great creating an everything in focus effect, visually distracting. The proportion of vase/surroundings does not appeal to me, and centered composition of main subject, the lighting is flat. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 12:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Trivial centered composition, oversaturated and globally overprocessed (I suspect the clarity trigger in Lightroom was pushed a bit too far). Par Tomas for depth of field issue. Obviously author wanted focus on vase, but choice of wide angle yields busy background. - Benh (talk) 12:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the lesson. :) --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
      • I prefer calling it opinion :) I hope it didn't sound like I was looking down on you. - Benh (talk) 22:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
        • No-no, it's okay. I'm upset a bit by those who dont have his own opinion. --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh. --Citron (talk) 19:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh. --Böhringer (talk) 11:19, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh. --Banangraut (talk) 15:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh. -- King of ♠ 17:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Do you have your own brain, or all of you use the Benh's one? Just interested. ;) --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
  • It is pure humbleness to appreciate a good review than to try to say something new/unimportant and pretend that we too are good reviewers. :) -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 02:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Oh, thanks for explanation. I'm simply a neophyte in this section of WM and dont understand something yet. But anyway - it's not very good that you've changed your opinion post factum... I think. --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Not so good; but sometimes we have to reconsider our opinions, considering the wise. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 12:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like everything in focus. It would just be a meaningless object without the context. Although I think the composition could have been decentered a little for a nice 2/3 ratio, but it still looks good. In fact the only reason I forgive the composition is BECAUSE everything is in focus. Badon (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It would be boring as a standalone object. The context adds a lot of value. Yann (talk) 05:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A bit oversaturated, also in my humble opinion the DoF is either too short or too long. --PierreSelim (talk) 18:15, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not clear what the main object is. Oversaturated. -- -donald- (talk) 07:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I also like pictures where it is not clear what the main object is. So for this one, it is all about taste: composition, color intensity, whatever... i like it! --Taraxacum (talk) 16:09, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Navy Day Sevastopol 2012 G05.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2012 at 06:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Navy Day in Sevastopol


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Encosta dos Guindais, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 06.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2012 at 19:33:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Encosta dos Guindais from the Dom Luis I bridge over the Douro river
  • Well, you're right. You can see a part of the shadow of the bridge that became FP a few days ago. I thought that it'd be no problem, because the subject and lighting are different. Actually, this picture is from the bridge, Poco a poco (talk) 11:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • That's not the problem, the problem is that this picture isn't as good as the other one. The shadow's a problem and the not very appealing composition is another, lack of a clear subject is the most important. There are beautiful pictures in the view, though. Stick on a telelens and try to focus on _one_ of the many details in there. There's a moorish wall, which doesn't get the attention it deserves, there's houses and stairs glued to the slope which make wonderfull compositions, a nice front of houses, etc. Kleuske (talk) 15:05, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Murdockcrc (talk) 10:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Why are the pixels on the right part of this image so curious? --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Could you add a note? I don't know what you mean Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 07:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A "no wow" would do it for me. But I'd add that it looks too NRed and oversharpened (or not properly sharpened like bad mask setting, I'm not really sure), resulting in that oil painting look. - Benh (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Ok, thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Lünersee Sauakopf Rätikon 46.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2012 at 20:18:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lünersee Sauakopf Rätikon
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Panorama auf dem Saulakopf im Rätikon. Blick auf den Lünersee. all by -- Böhringer (talk) 20:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Böhringer (talk) 20:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I added the Template "personality rights". --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 23:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- The 2 people looking at the camera are too distracting and prominent - luring the eye away from the panorama that should be the focus. -- Fotoriety (talk) 04:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Editors who have 50 edits can vote. --Ivar (talk) 05:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose: Per Fotoriety. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Despite the guy having same shoes as mine ;-) Horizon is in the middle. I've learnt not to like it. And the people really kill it imo. - Benh (talk) 08:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - as per above, the people make for a distracting foreground. --Murdockcrc (talk) 14:41, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Ok, thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it --Böhringer (talk) 10:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Küngs Maisäß Panorama.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2012 at 10:43:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Küngs Maisäß
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Küngs Maisäß all by -- Böhringer (talk) 10:43, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Böhringer (talk) 10:43, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lighting isn't ideal: too many dark places, and also tight framing. Tomer T (talk) 12:19, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The areas with purple paint look strange. -- King of ♠ 16:29, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Ok, thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it --Böhringer (talk) 10:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Podalirio (Iphiclides podalirius), Añón, España, 2012-08-27, DD 07.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2012 at 20:10:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Exemplar of Old World Swallowtail (Papilio machaon) in Añón, Aragon, Spain
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Exemplar of Scarce Swallowtail (Iphiclides podalirius) in Añón, Aragon, Spain. All by Poco a poco -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great details of the hind-wing including the long tail (I didn't see that much long tail in other photos of them. Is it a specific form?); but DOF issues in other parts (I know it is difficult in this AOV.) and feel noisy. We din't have a good photo of this species so far. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:22, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
    What do you mean with AOV? --Poco a poco (talk) 08:33, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
    Angle of view. Here we prefer to keep the butterfly flat to the sensor to get maximum sharpness (considering the EV). I like this AOV, looking straight at me; but back is far from the camera and out of focus. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 09:07, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
    You mean an angle like this? --Poco a poco (talk) 09:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
    That is interesting; but a clear underside or upper-side view is more preferred. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 10:17, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much out of focus: flower in front, wing in back. -- King of ♠ 04:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Ok, ok, was not a good idea. By the way, Jkadavoor, I cannot tell you if this exemplar is an specific subspecies, but agree with you that that tail is longer as what I can see in other pictures Poco a poco (talk) 06:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Alatskivi mõisa peahoone.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2012 at 19:22:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Ivar (talk) 19:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain -- Ivar (talk) 19:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support King of ♠ 05:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 05:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - the sky is a bit too dark for my taste (pol filter used maybe?), but looks like a FP to me. --Murdockcrc (talk) 10:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 13:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment tending to oppose: the sky looks really unnatural...--Jebulon (talk) 15:46, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's ok, if you do that. The sky looks dark due to use of polarizing filter. I was trying to reduce sun's reflection from the bright building and didn't notice the problem with the sky (I'm still entirely an amateur). --Ivar (talk) 18:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
      • I think you have only increased contrast between building and sky. Polarizers don't work like magic and only reduce reflections on specific conditions. It's recoverable, if you use good software, it's easy to brighten only blue color (and not channel). I could do it, but better from RAW imo :) - Benh (talk) 19:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New version uploaded, what do you think? --Ivar (talk) 19:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • To me it looks definitely better ! - Benh (talk) 10:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:13, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llorenzi (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 12:59, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stryn (talk) 13:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support – An underrepresented subject in excellent clarity, and the composition matches it subject nicely: a very fine catch for Commons. SteveStrummer (talk) 04:04, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per SteveStrummer. Tomer T (talk) 07:14, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 08:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Panoramas

File:Distelfalter , Vanessa cardui.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2012 at 19:41:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Distelfalter , Vanessa cardui
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Vanessa cardui, all by -- Böhringer (talk) 19:41, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Böhringer (talk) 19:41, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 20:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Slick (talk) 20:23, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Far better than existing FPs (1,2). The tail end of the hind wing is not sharp; the problem of the 100mms :( -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportBruce1eetalk 06:49, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support King of ♠ 07:13, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ionutzmovie (talk) 16:27, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very impressed, excellent picture.--Pollycat (talk) 17:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
    • You dont have enough edits to vote. -- JDP90 (talk) 17:31, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- JDP90 (talk) 17:32, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:22, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --JLPC (talk) 07:37, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Achird (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods

File:Fußballländerspiel Österreich-Ukraine (01.06.2012) 43.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2012 at 06:33:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

referee Felix Zwayer at Exhibition game Austria vs. Ukraine at 1st. June 2012