Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

File:Cream and red coffee cup-shaped balconies, Niimi Tableware, Kappabashi Dougu Street, Tokyo, Japan.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2019 at 01:49:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cream and red coffee cup-shaped balconies in Tokyo
  • A touch of levity in this strict world :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Indeed different but the environment is gray and boring. Funny but not wowing Poco2 17:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per poco. Centred composition, ordinary light. Just a QI. -- Colin (talk) 10:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 14:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 05:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 05:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Poco. —kallerna (talk) 05:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture#Japan

File:Crëusc sëura Lavies Bula.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2019 at 04:02:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wayside cross and stack of firewood in the forest of Bulain Gröden
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 04:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 04:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good and valuable image, but the background is too clutered to make this imgage special. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Christian Ferrer. I think it's a strong QI, but it doesn't have any extra wow for me, as it's a relatively ordinary object and a cluttered background. Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Christian. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose And the light is not too exciting either.--Peulle (talk) 16:15, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with the others -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agreed with Christian--Boothsift 05:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, although I think the crop I suggested might give it a chance. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the suggestion @Daniel Case: but I like the forest and the woodstack as environment for the wayside cross --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Hoofdorgel van de Grote of Sint-Bavokerk in Haarlem.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2019 at 10:19:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Müller organ in the Grote Kerk, Haarlem in the Netherlands
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Netherlands
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Excellent quality considering the high-resolution, and no obvious stitching faults. But I can't help but think I'd prefer a more centred composition; the slight asymmetry does bother me a little. Cmao20 (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cmao20, the angle chosen results in a disturbing lack of symmetry. Also the lamp on the bottom right is annoying and the crop overall a bit too tight form my taste Poco2 17:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMHO the off-center composition is reasonable here, because it prevents the chandelier from covering an important part of the church organ. --Aristeas (talk) 17:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Despite the size relatively much image noise. Without tripod I assume. The problem with the chandelier was well solved here.--Ermell (talk) 21:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Aristeas/Ermell. -- Colin (talk) 10:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 02:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:53, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:33, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 14:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cmao, sorry--Boothsift 05:32, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Poco. —kallerna (talk) 05:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects#Musical instruments

File:African Red-Eyed Bulbul 2019-07-25.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 18:32:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African red-eyed bulbul (pycnonotus nigricans)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looks OK to me. It's a passerine. Charles (talk) 09:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Here is a straighter poise, but with less prominent eye. --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 13:59, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • This bird is quite nice, but why is the horizon leaning that much to the left? When I apply a rotation of about 15 degrees to the picture, it looks immediately much more natural -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • When you put the other picture right next to this one, you can see the tilt is by bird, not by camera. Natural is whatever the bird does -- even if it looks like a stylized pose from mannerism? --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 18:05, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Well, Charles and you might be right. Certainly an optical effect, then. Thanks for the information -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:33, 28 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Pycnonotidae_(Bulbuls)

File:E-burg asv2019-05 img46 view from VysotSky.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2019 at 20:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from VysotSky panorama point
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of City Pond of Yekaterinburg from VysotSky panorama point at sunset ----- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 20:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 20:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharp photo, sun really adds something to the composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Aesthetic view of a Russian city with relatively few good shots on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 23:34, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 10:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Даже противоположный мост получился хорошо. (Надо кстати, посмотреть, что за мост и сделать аннотацию) --Brateevsky {talk} 10:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 14:14, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20 and Michielverbeek. --Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 17:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice view but will not support until the flares (in this case big red spots) are fixed Poco2 18:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 14:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  19:03, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Такую картину мы всегда стараемся снимать и редко получаем правильную. Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 05:33, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:16, 27 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia

File:Münster, Montgolfiade (an den Aaseewiesen) -- 2019 -- 9668 (crop).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 17:19:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hot air balloons at the 49th Montgolfiade in Münster (1st race), North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Aerostats
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 17:19, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info What would we be without good suggestions? Thank you, Cart. It was her suggestion. --XRay talk 17:19, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 17:19, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 'The Place Where Balloons Are Hatched' to sail out into the world. :-) To me this looks like a real-life version of something that artist Erik Johansson would spend weeks creating. XRay did it in one shot. --Cart (talk) 17:35, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think this is the best of your series of pictures of these balloons. The composition is more dramatic and inviting. Cmao20 (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Despite the average light, the subject is special and captivating enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:56, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 08:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 08:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 23:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart and Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 07:44, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Aerostats

File:Gorilla Male perspective 5.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 01:48:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Western Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) skull

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Thanks for informing me--Boothsift 17:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Harrah's Casino, New Orleans.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 21:38:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Harrah's Casino, New Orlens

*Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose CA and unsharp on the sides, should have stopped down to f/8 and used a longer exposure. -- King of ♠ 22:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per KOH, a good and illustrative cityscape but flawed for FP. In addition to the above criticisms, there is significant perspective distortion, and I find the crops a bit random especially the cut-off building on the right. Cmao20 (talk) 00:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the informative comments! Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC).

File:Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 02:28:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aztec Sandstone in the Valley of Fire, Nevada, USA.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Nevada
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info: all by me -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:28, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:28, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but, as spectacular as this definitely is, it suffers from many of the same problems as this one in that I don't think your lens was good enough to bring out detail at pixel level, and it's oversharpened to compensate. I think your current work is a lot better in terms of quality than these older pictures from the USA. Cmao20 (talk) 15:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, you're probably right. I guess I'll just have to come back and retake it :-)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not convinced by this composition, it looks like you're too near, the bottom is quite cut off, as is I see myself only standing before a huge block of rock. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

File:StockholmCentralStationinterior.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 23:35:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Ezarateesteban 23:35, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:35, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition seems cluttered to me, and motion blur at the bottom (especially the cut-off head) is rather distracting. -- King of ♠ 23:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Standard hall, not really special. Also per King -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. QI for sure, but no wow. A higher viewpoint, above the lamps, might be much more interesting. Just an idea, can’t say if this is possible. --Kreuzschnabel 07:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow but you did the best you could. This hall is notorious for being cluttered, uninspiring, dull and hard to get a decent full-size photo of. --Cart (talk) 10:55, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Strong QI but unfortunately I agree with Cart, it's just not the most interesting hall. Cmao20 (talk) 14:12, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cart and Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination thanks!!!! Ezarateesteban 18:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Pantala flavescens (globe skimmer) in flight, side view.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 00:43:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pantala flavescens (globe_skimmer) male, in flight


Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_(Skimmers)

File:Swallow Prominent on a grey wall.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2019 at 23:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swallow Prominent on a grey wall
  • My feeling, of course. Quality image but not an FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • On Wikipedia, Grey#In nature and culture: radioactivity, smoke, meteorite, wolf, military academy, battleship... Grey is also the color of pollution. This animal seems enclosed in an artificial and industrial environment unfortunately. Then a bit depressing, in my opinion. Like this one, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • To clarify, it is sitting on the wall of a medium-sized, gray-painted wooden house next to a forest. It's as far from an industrial environment as you can get, but you are of course entitled to your opinion. --Cart (talk) 22:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • If this wall was white or green, the impression would certainly be different. And if this animal was shot in the forest also -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • I'm with Basile on the aesthetics. Moths are annoying in choosing boring light-coloured places to settle. Charles (talk) 09:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the info Charles, I didn't know that. Well, it makes sense they would seek out places to rest where they are a little less visible for predators, I guess. I'm happy to learn the moth is in a place it likes. --Cart (talk) 09:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMHO this “Shades of Grey” ;–) image has got a special kind of aesthetics; the absence of vivid colours emphasizes the structure, like in a Grisaille painting. --Aristeas (talk) 15:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Now we are talking... Poco2 18:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support The specimen is beautiful. I've never focus-stacked myself, but I guess it's quite a bit surplus work. You can see the singular bristles and scales on the wall - which, I think, is not really focused, as well as the front legs. It drags my eyes... But I guess it just couldn't have been done better. --GeXeS (talk) 21:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • GeXeS, I have to be totally honest and say that: Yes, it can be done better, if you have a DSLR (perhaps full-frame) and a marco lens, which I don't. I'm just happy it came out as good as it did. --Cart (talk) 21:24, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support although can anything be done to reduce the blown highlights on the right wing? Cmao20 (talk) 21:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Not that much I can do since the white scales seem to be oriented directly at the sun in that area, with almost no shadows in between them. I have managed to retrieve some info from a few layers the stacking program hadn't used and patched it in now. --Cart (talk) 22:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 10:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Familia: Notodontidae

File:Münster, Montgolfiade (an den Aaseewiesen) -- 2019 -- 9804.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2019 at 14:11:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hot air balloons at the 49th Montgolfiade in Münster (1st race), North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Aerostats
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 14:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 14:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Dramatic and illustrative capture. Cmao20 (talk) 21:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The left part looks a bit cluttered. Tight crop, a bit too close to the technician. Interesting image but the composition is not well balanced in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 14:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I wish it had more DoF, though. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:31, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 23:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry to spoil the party, but I'm not wowed. Daniel Case (talk) 16:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunately having thought about it for a while, I'm with Daniel on this one. It is very instructive, but instructing can get a bit cluttered. Concentrating on just the red elements in the photo, balloon/flame/basket/fire extinguisher, might have been better visually. --Cart (talk) 21:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel also--Boothsift 05:34, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above, Poco2 08:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above. —kallerna (talk) 05:34, 30 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:19, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Schlafmohn Papaver somniferum 2019-06-17 13-19-31 (C).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 06:56:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Centre of a opium poppy blossom. Stacked from 23 frames.


Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Plants#Family : Papaveraceae

File:Stena Jutlandica September 2013 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2019 at 17:33:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stena Jutlandica
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Stena Jutlandica arrives in Gothenburg under the Älvsborg Bridge. I tried to combine two well-known symbols for Gothenburg in a picture. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I even think you got Kal and Ada on the top deck. Doesn't get more Göteborg (or as they write it now, go:teborg) than that. :) --Cart (talk) 20:53, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great composition. Cmao20 (talk) 21:50, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I think it's a great idea, but not the best execution. The bridge is too close to the top, which makes it feel disconnected from the ship, and the lampposts are also too close to the top edge as a result. -- King of ♠ 22:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 14:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  18:53, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 23:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 05:35, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support The bridge above seems a little jarring, but it's a good enough image for FP otherwise. Daniel Case (talk) 17:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 18:12, 28 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

File:Cygnus-Wall.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 22:53:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cygnus Wall
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Cygnus Wall, a portion of the North America Nebula in the constellation Cygnus; the part of the nebula where star formation is densest. Note that instead of being just another NASA shot, this is an image by an amateur astronomer with an account on Commons. I found this very impressive, as it is not too far away from NASA standards, and it certainly has wow for me. created by Cpayoub - uploaded by Cpayoub - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 23:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'd like to see clouds like this in my sky, sometimes :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is raining on the sky. --Yann (talk) 08:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Bijay chaurasia (talk) 09:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 10:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 22:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 02:51, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 09:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Astronomy#Nebulae

File:Edison's Greatest Marvel-The Vitascope - Restoration.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2019 at 14:35:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vitascope


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 18:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Blond child with blue eyes.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 20:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blond child with blue eyes
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by khalilalattar, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 20:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 20:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As usual, I struggle to accept that we should promote portraits of unknown children. But I realise I'm in a minority. I guess we'll do nothing till a parent makes a big fuss. Charles (talk) 21:18, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Striking sight and good composition. These bright eyes and this red headscarf remind me the Afghan Girl. Unfortunately the quality is not there, at full size, posterization artifacts (hair and cheeks). Downsized image. Probably heavy JPG compression, since the size is only 524 KB -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very poor quality. In addition, absolutely no background information such as location, ethnicity. --A.Savin 01:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks nice as a thumbnail but the heavy artefacts mean that the technical quality is too low.--Peulle (talk) 07:28, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Very poor quality JPG. Overcompressed. -- Colin (talk) 16:58, 3 September 2019 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 18:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Onésime Reclus Nadar GALLICA.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 07:22:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Onésime Reclus, a French geographer

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 20:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 18:43, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

File:White-backed Vulture (Gyps africanus) (32467673583).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 09:53:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White-backed vulture (Gyps africanus) in Kruger National Park, South Africa
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well, the remaining noise is hard to avoide with a bridge camera. I was looking for FPs of Gyps africana. The only other one is IMO less worthy of FP. --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 11:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
More likely bad camera settings or post-processing. It's the same camera I use and this is way more noise than I usually get. --Cart (talk) 12:08, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A good and valuable illustration for articles, but per Cart the processing really lets this one down. Cmao20 (talk) 14:17, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:37, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technical issues aside this is a really busy and chaotic composition with an overabundance of earth tones that doesn't help. Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others--Boothsift 02:52, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 18:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Earth-DSCOVR-20150706-IFV.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 07:49:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The first DSCOVR EPIC image, released by NASA on July 6, 2015, shows the full sunlit Earth from 916,651 mi (1,475,207 km) away, centered on the Americas.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NASA - uploaded by Drbogdan and JorisvS - nominated by The NMI User -- The NMI User (talk) 07:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The NMI User (talk) 07:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose with this resolution. We have a bigger image which is 45 years old. I suppose NASA can do better than that today. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose An image of the Earth only 3 megapixels one of the best images on Commons? I think not.--Peulle (talk) 08:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:05, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's not bad, but as well as the file Yann links to we have lots more FPs of Earth from space. Not sure what makes this one special enough that it should be featured as well. Cmao20 (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others (although I'm surprised no one has yet pointed out that it needs perspective correction Face-smile.svg). Daniel Case (talk) 15:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others--Boothsift 02:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Never, per others. The crop done to the original upload, causing even visible damage to the image quality (file downsized by 2.5!) wasn’t a good idea either (could at least have chosen a 1:1 ratio crop). --Kreuzschnabel 06:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 18:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Neon.JPG (delist), not delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2019 at 10:54:10
Neon sign

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Featured in 2007. No longer meets FP criteria of todays standards imo, 4 megapixel resolution, for a static object, not very sharp. A large portion of the image is empty. More detail in the tubing would've been visible with different camera settings, see File:NeTube.jpg showing more detail. Category:Neon signs files are not hugely different in quality to this. (Original nomination)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist -- BevinKacon (talk) 10:54, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep I do not see that much better neon images, there is something visually pleasing in this one. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep BevinKacon, feel free to nominate any images you think are better, but I'm not seeing anything so wrong with this that suggests our featured collection of neon signs (or any signs or lights) has left this one looking weak in comparison and no longer worthy of the badge. Sharpness looks fine and I don't think more megapixels would add any more detail to a sign that is meant to be looked at from some distance. Btw, I'm aware that the white light requires an argon-mercury filling, rather than a pure neon filling (which would be red or orange), but according to Wikipedia, this sort of light tube technology is still called a neon lamp. As a work of art (which this sign presumably is) it has its own value rather than being used as a sign for some shop or entertainment venue. The composition, with the light fading to black on the edge of the frame is nicely done. So, I don't think this is merely a QI of some random neon sign. -- Colin (talk) 15:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep The compo and meta qualities of it are still ok. --Cart (talk) 20:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Quality is fine. -- King of ♠ 20:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep What is wrong with this picture?--Boothsift 05:37, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep --Pudelek (talk) 12:27, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Weak keep per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Result: 1 delist, 7 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. --A.Savin 18:32, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Liliuokalani, c. 1891.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 06:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Queen Lili'uokalani of the Hawaiian Kingdom
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting people
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Unknown creator; restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting subject, great level of details, good restoration, as usual. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:08, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 08:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support mostly because of the very interesting history behind it --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:07, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 10:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very interesting. Cmao20 (talk) 14:12, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 22:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great work by Adam Cuerden. --Gnosis (talk) 06:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Though I'd prefer it without the signature, really (it makes for a nice story, granted). — Rhododendrites talk |  04:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Yann. --Aristeas (talk) 12:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 02:51, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: People#Sitting people

File:Machapuchare Himal-3797.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 09:33:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
@W.carter, Charlesjsharp: ✓ Done Reprocessed please have a look.--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better. --Cart (talk) 17:42, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well the painted bright blue sky has gone, but I'm still not sure about the hills. Charles (talk) 19:55, 29 August 2019
@Charlesjsharp:Hills are ok. 100% organic :)--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 05:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good then, though I'd crop a bit off the bottom. Charles (talk) 09:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

(UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural#Nepal

File:Winter auf der Milseburg.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 17:55:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winter on the Misleburg in the Rhoen Mountains


Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:38, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural/Germany

File:Torlesse Range from Mt Torlesse, New Zealand.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 20:26:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Torlesse Range from Mt Torlesse, New Zealand
  • Both shots were taken 2 hours away. Same light, same mountains. I'm saying this because I've immediately had an impression of dejà vu. "I'll withdraw if it is" No, wait: I've not opposed yet Face-grin.svg -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • I mean I'm happy to withdraw if folks here think it's too similar. I guess I haven't participated at FPC long enough to develop the sense on what's too similar and what is still acceptable. --Podzemnik (talk) 07:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral if you want my opinion. The composition, but also the light were better in the other -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • @Basile Morin Sure, I always welcome any opinion. I was thinking that maybe we can mention somewhere at COM:FP that similar pictures should't be nominated and link some cases where pictures were declined at FPC for too much similaritiy and when it was acceptable. --Podzemnik (talk) 18:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 04:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support We have plenty of lookalike photos of Alps. This is great in its own right. --Cart (talk) 09:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart. Cmao20 (talk) 12:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 22:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural/New Zealand

File:Torre de Hércules, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-24, DD 12-15 PAN.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2019 at 14:13:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tower of Hercules, A Coruña, Galicia, Spain.


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture/Towers

File:Corniglia dal Sentiero Azzurro1.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 15:36:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Distant view of Corniglia and Manarola from the Azure Trail, Cinque Terre, Italy.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info: all by me -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Fine place but what I don’t like is the dark background on the left (hillside in shadow). Instead, I’d prefer to see more of the foreground rock to the bottom and to the right. Rather soft for 15 mpix. There’s a strange dark seam above the hillside horizon, maybe from retouching work. Altogether I don’t think thats one of the very best images on Commons while it’s really nice. --Kreuzschnabel 05:57, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the comments. I was going to fix the dark seam, but all I see are some darker clouds, perhaps you could leave a note? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good composition but it all looks a bit too hazy, and the light is a little flat. I think you weren't lucky with the weather; an FP of this beautiful place is certainly possible. Cmao20 (talk) 15:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:16, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Hydrangea arborescens Annabelle over a fence.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 17:36:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hydrangea arborescens Annabelle over a fence
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hydrangeaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info So, why the fence? Besides acting as an interesting line and kind of impromptu "vase" for the flowers, it has another meaning for me. Here in Sweden, these flowers are synonym with old gardens and this perspective and old painted fence, brings me back to being a kid in my grandmother's garden, lying on the grass looking up at the white balls and imagining they were fluffy clouds in the sky. Not sure anyone else sees it that way though. -- Cart (talk) 17:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cart (talk) 17:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 18:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Works for me. Makes a surprisingly good desktop wallpaper too. Cmao20 (talk) 23:01, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The disturbingly out-of-focus left edge isn't working for me, sorry. -- King of ♠ 23:50, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very cool angle and great framing. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:57, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Blurred foreground, but also not very special. Ordinary light, boring grey -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Working for me. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose: thumbnail looks lovely, but not much is in focus in the full view. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others--Ermell (talk) 06:52, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose The idea of the fence as a contrasting line is interesting and works for me; however, I would have chosen a slightly higher point of view so the fence is less dominant, and more of the blossoms visible. My reason to slightly oppose again is a pixelpeeping one: the left flowerball shows entirely sharpened noise instead of the creamy bokeh I’d like to see here, so it won’t work well as a desktop wallpaper either. --Kreuzschnabel 07:17, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Kreuz, thanks for your keen eye, I had missed that and you bring up a bothering subject. Sharpening noise is more visible on Commons' interface since it tends to add a bit more sharpening/contrast to photos (more prominent at thumb size). I've discussed this with another photographer and we have compared how photos are displayed on Commons vs Flickr (less extra sharpening) or Photosop and Lightroom. It is rather difficult to get some photos to look good on all sites as well as on your own computer. Anyway, I have reverted the smart sharpening on the left ball and it looks much better. Thanks! --Cart (talk) 10:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • I never knew that websites sharpen images! Charles (talk) 13:46, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Sharpening/contrast/whatever; some websites use software that affects how photos are displayed, most prominent with thumbs or previews. Take a look at how this photo looks at thumb vs full size (and it looks less glary on Flickr). Or the difference on Commons and Flickr for this apple tree. MediaWiki seems to like the thumbs more contrasty(sharpening) for "cleaner" display in articles. --Cart (talk) 14:36, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Works for me too Bijay chaurasia (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose top part of the flowers are too bright and left one is out of focus. Seven Pandas (talk) 21:37, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great! --XRay talk 04:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely light! —kallerna (talk) 05:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nom.:
"this perspective and old painted fence, brings me back to being a kid in my grandmother's garden,"
We had a hedge back home in the suburbs / Over which I never could see
"... lying on the grass looking up at the white balls and imagining they were fluffy clouds in the sky."
What were the skies like when you were young?
Daniel Case (talk) 01:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
A truly poetic vote. Thanks Daniel. --Cart (talk) 09:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others--Boothsift 02:50, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Thanks all for your comments. --Cart (talk) 08:39, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Sameksha Singh, Bollywood actress, photoshoot (cropped).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 07:13:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sameksha Singh, Bollywood actress
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by AtticDeveloper77, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 07:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support We don't have any FP of Bollywood people yet. And very few of people from the movie industry in general. -- Yann (talk) 07:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Creator not registered? Eyes could perhaps be sharper in an unmoving portrait shot. --Axel (talk) 10:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I was wondering: AtticDeveloper77 has no user page and the contribs list a number of deletion requests/rights claims against user Beeblebrox. Is this legit now? Do we have the real creator here? --Axel (talk) 17:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • All the uploads of AtticDeveloper77 are original images with consistent EXIF data, so I don't see any reason to doubt authorship. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good enough for me. Cmao20 (talk) 12:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Doesn't look quite crisp to me. Looks like it's been airbrushed or something.--Peulle (talk) 21:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noise, no reason for a studio shot to be at ISO 2,500. -- King of ♠ 22:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I'm with Peulle on this. Probably some popular softening "beauty filter" has been applied. Also she looks a bit vacant/'not connecting with the camera' to me. --Cart (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • @W.carter: The softness and the thoughtful mood are certainly on purpose. They are features, not bugs. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • I know they are features, I just don't find those features attractive in this case. --Cart (talk) 09:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Peulle--Boothsift 02:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 04:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Taktsang Monastery, Bhutan 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 01:21:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A building of Taktsang Palphug Monastery, Bhutan
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Bhutan
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by and uploaded by Bgag - nominated by Boothsift -- Boothsift 01:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Boothsift 01:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Dominant right rock face directs attention to depth of crack. --Axel (talk) 05:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dull light, no wow. —kallerna (talk) 05:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 09:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Dramatic place. Sharpness could be better, but OK at 7 megapixels. Cmao20 (talk) 12:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Wow is there, but definitely unsharp. For a static motif, a crisper pic should normally be no problem, I guess? --A.Savin 20:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. -- King of ♠ 22:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KennyOMG (talk) 21:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per A. Savin. Daniel Case (talk) 01:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Thank you--Boothsift 02:51, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Red-Crested Korhaan 2019-07-24.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 06:37:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red-Crested Korhaan (lophotis ruficrista) near Okaukuejo in Etosha National Park, Namibia
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Certainly the better mug shot, but no pattern view and head crest view possible with ruffled feathers from the side perspective. Tight crop bottom to avoid dominant gravel shadow and left to allow facing into two-thirds. Also: how about sharpening artefacts around feather contours? --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 09:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the way this pose shows off the plumage, and the relationship with the background. The patterns remind me of butterfly/moth wings. -- Colin (talk) 10:51, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good compo, well balanced. I like the way the sharp arrow-shaped pattern on an arrow-shaped body up to the pointy beak, contrasts the blurry round pebbles. --Cart (talk) 12:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This image has many good qualities, but I agree with Charles about the composition, and the image quality is not perfect with a little less detail on the feathers than I might have liked. The image Charles links to is OK, but you're right about the sharpening artefacts. Overall neither quite rises to the standard of FP for me, sorry. I think you have plenty of better pics. Cmao20 (talk) 18:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition doesn't work for me with this distracting shadow at the bottom right corner and the tight crop at left & bottom. Also per Charles, animal seen from behind, not the most captivating show -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:35, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per Basile--Boothsift 05:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles; also I find the background distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 16:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Nunnery Erlenbad - Sasbach 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 05:12:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nunnery Erlenbad, southeast facade, Sasbach, Germany
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 05:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 05:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice, but please correct the stitching error (see note). Unfortunately a bit unsharp at the sides --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Llez (talk) 10:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think we are gaining much from the very wide angle panorama. I recommend a crop all round. Too much path foreground and trees in the side which only emphasise the harsh midday sun. It is a good capture of the building, but we have many fine buildings and I don't think this quite makes FP. -- Colin (talk) 10:57, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Cropped as suggested --Llez (talk) 11:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wouldn't have supported the uncropped version, but this is now more than good enough for me. Cmao20 (talk) 18:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seven Pandas (talk) 21:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support this one or the previous version with the wonderful garden -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 05:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 08:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 17:46, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:35, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

File:Ratargul-02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 04:25:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Children in a boat on the Shari-Goyain River in Ratargul Swamp Forest, Bangladesh.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Abdulmominbd - uploaded by Abdulmominbd - nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 04:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 04:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Truly a WOW picture. Does it need straightening of the horizon? Boat and riverside seem to have a slight left tilt. --Axel (talk) 04:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 05:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Beautiful Bijay chaurasia (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 06:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 06:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But please give it a bit more meaningful name after the nomination is over. --Podzemnik (talk) 07:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Podzemnik. It should also have a {{personality rights}} tag added as soon as the protection is lifted, or if some admin could fix it. --Cart (talk) 09:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Spectacular capture but I wish some of the CA could be corrected. Cmao20 (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 17:58, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Not the highest quality but very nice. -- King of ♠ 22:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Category changed from Places/Natural to People#Sitting_people. The previous one is more dedicated to natural landscapes, while the subjects here are clearly these children -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Blurry background but fresh image -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Glad to see this here. This was the winner of Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Bangladesh. Disclosure: I was on the jury, if that matters for FPC purposes. — Rhododendrites talk |  04:15, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 10:13, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yeah...--Boothsift 02:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 08:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: People#Sitting_people

File:Climbing World Championships 2018 Combined Final Klingler (BT0B0188).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 12:33:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Petra Klinger, 2018 world climbing championships Innsbruck, combined finals
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_Sports
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by simon04 - uploaded by simon04 - nominated by Granada -- Granada (talk) 12:33, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Granada (talk) 12:33, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow! That blue blurry hold would be distracting if it wasn't for her glaring at it (or in that direction) as if it was an antagonist. (Or as if is was Lara Croft in a computer game where she has to reach the button to turn of the destruction of the galaxy. :-) ) --Cart (talk) 12:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really fascinating colors in black space; plus great concentration mirrored in the expression --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 15:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very distracting blurry foreground. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart and Axel. Not perfect (blurry foreground) but the pose and expression work very well. Cmao20 (talk) 18:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good.--Ermell (talk) 20:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree Yann. Seven Pandas (talk) 21:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Yann. -- King of ♠ 03:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Yann--Boothsift 05:39, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 06:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Works for me, but I would request a more detailed description incl. the full name of the climber. A statement concerning personality rights is also required. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart and Axel. --Aristeas (talk) 07:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reluctant, but having looked at this every day, the blurry foreground hold distracts from the great shot. Perhaps another crop might improve things? Charles (talk) 09:21, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  04:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Sports#Individual_Sports

File:Crested serpent eagle - Spilornis cheela.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 10:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crested serpent eagle
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Senthiaathavan - uploaded by Senthiaathavan - nominated by A-wiki-guest-user -- A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Unsharp and noised, low quality -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose A very dramatic image that deservedly did well in WLE, but the image quality is not great. It looks better downsized to 6 mpx but even then significant noise is visible (although the unsharpness on the wing doesn't matter to me as it's indicative of a bird in flight). I also get the impression that there's vignetting going on at the corners, and whether that was the fault of the lens or a deliberate post-processing choice, it isn't really a mark of quality for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Because of the noise. --Axel (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 21:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes per others--Boothsift 02:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose I think it's time for the nominator to take the hint from all these opposes and withdraw the nomination. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 4 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Pseudo Kleinian OpenCL 26082019 8K 004.png, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 11:10:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A 3D Appolonian gasket (more infos in the file description)


Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

File:African emerald cuckoo (Chrysococcyx cupreus) male.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 15:21:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African emerald cuckoo (Chrysococcyx cupreus) male, Kakum National park, Ghana
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Cuculidae_(Cuckoos)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Charlesjsharp - uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by -- Axel (talk) 15:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Axel (talk) 15:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality shot from Charles, and very beautiful; seems to be the best image of this species on Commons. Shame the accompanying female is partly covered by leaves, else we could have had a set. Cmao20 (talk) 16:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 16:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support What a beautifully camouflaged bird! -- King of ♠ 22:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:10, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Messy environment that would not work with an ordinary bird, but these iridescent feathers are so special -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Basile. --Cayambe (talk) 07:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, this is a stunning bird (with bright yellow chest feathers) that I only saw once from a canopy walkway in Ghana and had no chance for a better shot. As Wikipedia says cuckoos are "a shy and retiring family, more often heard than seen". Charles (talk) 08:36, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 12:44, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seven Pandas (talk) 19:54, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:43, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 02:50, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Cuculidae_(Cuckoos)

File:Dampfzug am Brocken in Winterlandschaft (2).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 14:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • The more I look at this, I am sure this is tilted about 2 deg. Mtrienke and Tomer T. Does anyone agree? Charles (talk) 21:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Carts number 3 and 4 are fine. It seems that these vehicles can jolt -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Carriages may be... but not the engine! Charles (talk) 10:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles

File:Dode geknakte berk (Betula) 21-08-2019. (d.j.b). 09.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 15:16:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Now after a second look, no wow--Boothsift 02:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 08:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Quality is fine, but I miss some wow here, not sure what makes this shot special Poco2 08:27, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not an excellent picture for me.--Fischer.H (talk) 08:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting picture and good quality as ever but I don't think this is among your best. At first I didn't really know what I was looking at, and an FP for me shouldn't be a picture where you rely on the caption to see what's going on. I agree that it lacks wow compared to your best work. Cmao20 (talk) 16:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good light but I don't see anything else than messy branches. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Dode geknakte berk (Betula) 21-08-2019. (d.j.b). 08.jpg

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good light but I don't see anything else than messy branches. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO way better than the other one. The wider view gives more context so I can understand what I'm looking at. Cmao20 (talk) 23:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Better but still not FP to me. Hightlights seem blown, and the image somehow lacks depth to me. The cut-off branches don’t help. Composition just looks arbitrary. Maybe it should have been taken from the right hand side, with the crack in foreground and the cracked-off tip pointing away from the viewer. --Kreuzschnabel 07:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment. You mean like this--Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not wowed by either one ... all I see is a damaged tree. Daniel Case (talk) 05:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:54, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Official program - Woman suffrage procession March 3, 1913 - crop.jpg (delist), delisted and replaced[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 14:20:41

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I found a better source for this one, which let me get more natural colours, and it lacked the missing chip that ate the leftmost woman's shoulder, forcing a reconstruction that was nearly, but not quite, correct. Also, having quite a few years of experience on my younger self doesn't hurt. (Original nomination)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Improvements are all sensible. Cmao20 (talk) 18:46, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Cayambe (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Boothsift 05:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep The new version looks blurred to me. Especially looking at the "Votes for women" text.--Peulle (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
    • @Peulle: It's halftoned. Some historical artefacts, like this one, only exist in halftone. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace .--Vulphere 08:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Gnosis (talk) 06:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted and replaced. --A.Savin 08:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Seehof Phoenicurus ochruros female 5264746.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2019 at 21:07:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black redstart, female, in the park of Seehof Castle near Bamberg
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Muscicapidae_(Old_World_Flycatchers)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wonderful light and color, central position works here -- Axel Tschentscher (talk) 21:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good capture :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:39, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks like the early bird caught the worm. -- King of ♠ 03:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 05:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 08:10, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 08:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharp, good quality and composition. Cmao20 (talk) 16:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 08:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The greenish light caused by the tree leaves prevents the viewer from understanding the true feather colors of this species. So, from an encyclopedic perspective, I'd never use it in a biology-related article. However, we could still perceive it as a work of art, rather than an illustration with encyclopedic value. For me personally, though, even the second criterion isn't fulfilled. That's why I think of this as a quality image, rather than a featured picture. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Axel and King. --Aristeas (talk) 07:53, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes, I hadn't checked. Frank is right. Charles (talk) 09:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 07:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae_(Old_World_Flycatchers)

File:Pier by Sabine Hut, Nelson Lakes National Park, New Zealand.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 06:51:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pier by Sabine Hut, Nelson Lakes National Park, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places#New_Zealand
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. I quite like the light a simple, straightforward composition. -- Podzemnik (talk) 06:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 06:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A bit too much wooden deck IMO. See note. -- Colin (talk) 07:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
    • @You'll be right, Colin. I provided an alternative version. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 16:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good also. It is a different image. --Yann (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

16:9 alternative[edit]

Pier by Sabine Hut 16-9, Nelson Lakes National Park

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 10:35, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, this works better or me, too. --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 12:44, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not subtle, but impressive quality and nice light. Cmao20 (talk) 16:46, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cart (talk) 17:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --D-Kuru (talk) 18:33, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 06:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect crop. -- -donald- (talk) 06:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 08:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm a friend of 16:9 but I find the other one better. It transports the distance and the length of the way much better. --Hockei (talk) 16:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 23:45, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Both are good, I prefer this one. --Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 21:55, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 04:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 06:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks like one of those pictures in photography magazines explaining centered perspective. Daniel Case (talk) 15:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 02:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places#New_Zealand
The chosen alternative is: File:Pier_by_Sabine_Hut_16-9,_Nelson_Lakes_National_Park,_New_Zealand.jpg

File:Pluvialis fulva 5 - Boat Harbour.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 12:54:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pacific Golden Plover (Pluvialis fulva), Boat Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
Sorry for the category error; thanks for fixing it. --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 17:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Well, the location and coordinates were in the description if not in categories. All fixed up now at least. (This too should have been made before nominating it, You'll get it right next time. ;-) ) --Cart (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Super quality bird, but blurred foreground distracting. Charles (talk) 14:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very sharp, good composition, excellent light, beautiful colors. Clear FP for me (like the previous one) -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Basile. Quality seems good and the blurriness of the foreground doesn't bother me. Cmao20 (talk) 16:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 17:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 05:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 08:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 16:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 23:47, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kreuzschnabel 07:19, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:46, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 21:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  04:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 02:50, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family_:_Charadriidae_(Plovers)

File:Równia pod Śnieżką (2019).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 12:25:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Równia pod Śnieżką, Krkonoše mountains - hiking signs
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good snowy scene. Cmao20 (talk) 16:47, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 17:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 18:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 05:35, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 08:32, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The signpost is the interesting thing about this picture and the right part is uninteresting. The realization could have been better.--Ermell (talk) 06:55, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Of course the signpost is the main feature, but nevetheless the almost empty part at the right is OK for me – it is something like negative space and emphasizes the signpost by putting it in context: a frozen signpost in the middle of nowhere. --Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 17:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 21:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow for me. —kallerna (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dirtsc (talk) 07:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ermell. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 02:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places

File:Sapphire-throated hummingbird (Lepidopyga coeruleogularis coeruleogularis) male.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 08:59:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sapphire-throated hummingbird (Lepidopyga coeruleogularis coeruleogularis) male in Panama


Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)

File:Tukche, Nepal-WLV-1450.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2019 at 08:13:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
I hope you will see less dirty, shed and more significant images from Nepal.--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perhaps the natural stone wall of the path is one (of three) dramatic diagonals coming from the corners with the distant peak of the Tukche Ri in the center? Can't have center plus diagonals w/o the buildings. Also: The gravel path and the people plus goat bridge it leads to are fairly typical of Nepal. --Axel Tschentscher (talk) 20:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 06:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 08:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Don't like how the branches of the central tree are obscuring the mountains in the background. The composition also doesn't connect for me; the foreground lines are leading into the right side, not the snow-capped mountains which should be the central focus. -- King of ♠ 23:47, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per King of Hearts--Ermell (talk) 06:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per King of Hearts. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:37, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others, not outstanding. --Milseburg (talk) 17:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't have problems with the composition, or the subject, but it's not sharp enough. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not outstanding as per King of Hearts --Boothsift 02:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Peatonal-Estocolmo.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 23:31:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pedestrian street in Stockholm
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me Ezarateesteban 23:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Seems like a snapshot to me. The people don't really have an interesting expression, and there's nothing to distinguish the composition. -- King of ♠ 03:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hey, I recognize that street! Fellow Wikimania traveler, I take it. :) Thanks for uploading. It works for an illustration of Drottninggatan (crowded commercial walking street in Stockholm that I learned to avoid in the week I was there :) ), but there needs to be something more remarkable going on here to compensate for the overexposed highlights/noise. — Rhododendrites talk |  04:10, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. Good quality and nice illustration of the street, but it doesn't really have anything special for FP in terms of lighting or composition. Cmao20 (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others sorry. There’s really nothing special for me in this shot, you could take a pic like this in any city of the world. I’d cut off the dark part on the very right-hand edge. --Kreuzschnabel 17:56, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with the others, sorry but it is just too ordinary --Boothsift 07:22, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others; it just looks like any other picture of any other pedestrian mall. Daniel Case (talk) 21:49, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination thanks!!! Ezarateesteban 23:19, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Sitting Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) bathing in Tad Lo river, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 01:45:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sitting Asian elephant bathing in river
  • There aren't any other Asian elephant FPs. Charles (talk) 22:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • I think there's one. But yes, many fewer Asian than African. Cmao20 (talk) 18:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 20:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Charles. --Aristeas (talk) 08:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 07:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 07:42, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals#Order : Proboscidea (Elephants)

File:La vallata di Poggiorsini vista nel dettaglio.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2019 at 17:31:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Poggiorsini dale in Alta Murgia National Park
Out of date clock icon.svg
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. Feel free to nominate it later after one of the other noms is closed or withdrawn.--Cart (talk) 17:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Footbridge over a pond in Shinjuku Gyoen National Garden and NTT DoCoMo Yoyogi Building, Tokyo, Japan.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 01:58:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Footbridge over a pond in Shinjuku Gyoen National Garden and NTT DoCoMo Yoyogi Building, Tokyo
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination before any display on the main page. Because the bridge is closed, this nomination may be controversial. Perhaps I will renominate it later -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

File:VistaCityHallEstocolmo.2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2019 at 18:59:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of City Hall of Stockholm
✓ Done thanks W.carter Ezarateesteban 19:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
I wrote after the nom was over. If it becomes an FP this name change during the nom will mess up the codes. Oh well, I'll keep an eye on it and fix things if it becomes successful. Just keep it in mind till the next time. --Cart (talk) 19:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I personally think the crane and the people ruin the view--Boothsift 20:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and wait for a nicer day too. Charles (talk) 22:41, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles. Good composition, good quality, deserved QI, but you weren't lucky with the weather and the lighting conditions. This image on a better day could have been clearly FP, I think. Cmao20 (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Boothsift--Fischer.H (talk) 10:11, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Vulphere 09:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Boston City Hall aerial 2019 P1020786.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2019 at 13:37:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boston City Hall in 2019
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NewtonCourt - uploaded by NewtonCourt - nominated by Pine -- Pine (✉) 13:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pine (✉) 13:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose May be useful for a WP article, but still no wow for FP, perspective is distorted --A.Savin 18:51, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too soft, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 20:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per A.Savin, no wow--Boothsift 07:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good image to illustrate the building, but perspective is distorted and there are some quality issues. Overall I do find that it lacks wow. Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination --Pine (✉) 01:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Elm Bank canoe launch 213345 929.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2019 at 13:50:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Canoe launch site on the Charles River at Elm Bank in Wellesley, Massachusetts
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NewtonCourt - uploaded by NewtonCourt - nominated by Pine -- Pine (✉) 13:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pine (✉) 13:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose What is so special about this photo? No wow for me --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:28, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but I don't like this light.--Peulle (talk) 20:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow as per Michiel--Boothsift 07:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition but indifferent quality - some significant blurriness and smudged details in the darker areas. Overall I like the image but I don't see enough that's special about it; it's not a particularly unusual or exceptional view. Cmao20 (talk) 13:38, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination I like the image but apparently I'm a small minority. --Pine (✉) 01:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Bungemuseet Broa July 2019 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 04:34:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:St Botolph's Aldgate, London, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2019 at 22:50:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A view of the interior of St Botolph's Aldgate from the gallery


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:11, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#United Kingdom

File:View of Tad Lo river from above, with temporary footbridge and goats, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 01:48:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Tad Lo river from above, with temporary footbridge and goats, Laos
Pictogram voting keep.svg Fixed You have good eyes, Podzemnik! Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
    • @Basile Morin Or perhaps you have a camera with too many megapixels (no I'm not jealous at all!). The view is really good - the goats make it wowy. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • More pixels on your camera = less space on your hard disk :-) Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:32, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 09:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 12:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:14, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not quite sure how this composition manages to work, but it definitely does. Cmao20 (talk) 16:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:33, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:46, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --B2Belgium (talk) 19:52, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Boothsift 07:19, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support excellent composition --Milseburg (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 09:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 06:26, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural#Laos

File:Zion National Park, Springdale.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2019 at 16:58:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Zion National Park, Springdale
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ken Lane, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yann (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wow there is, but poor quality. Extreme oversharpening meets extreme noise suppression. --A.Savin 20:19, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose +1. --Peulle (talk) 22:38, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per A. Savin. Try again. -- -donald- (talk) 10:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Way overcooked. -- Colin (talk) 11:51, 5 September 2019 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Crocodylus porosus - Wilhelma.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 05:11:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crocodylus porosus Schneider, 1801, Saltwater crocodile, female; Wilhelma, Stuttgart


Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Reptiles

File:Tree with red apples in Barkedal 4.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 10:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tree with red apples in Barkedal
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The dry and hot summer of 2018 was very hard on most plants here in Sweden, but the apples thrived in the many hours of sunshine. I have never seen such red apples here before! No saturation added. -- Cart (talk) 10:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cart (talk) 10:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I indeed thought to nominate one of your apple tree pictures. They look like cherries... Regards, Yann (talk) 11:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 12:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:13, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A remarkable sight, and per Yann. I like the square crop too. Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Yann. The crop first astonished me, but it is really good. --Aristeas (talk) 08:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Tnx! I can't take credit for the crop, that was Colin's idea, which again shows that it is always good to have another pair of eyes on your photos. The full photo is in the file history, should anyone want it. --Cart (talk) 09:01, 3 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 20:54, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Plants#Family : Rosaceae

File:Юрьевская пещера.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 12:06:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cave Yurievskaya, Tatarstan, Russia


Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Natural/Russia#Volga Federal District

File:Plushies Mexico.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2019 at 19:51:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A plush toys shop in Mexico City.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz -- Gzzz zz 19:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Gzzz zz 19:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wrong focus, not everything is really sharp --Michielverbeek (talk) 21:07, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Striking image, quite special in its kind. Reminding me 99 cent by Andreas Gursky. Average quality but interior shots with non-static subjects are difficult. It looks quite good at 2500 px large -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 05:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Michielverbeek.--Peulle (talk) 06:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:24, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Basile. Sharpness is not perfect, but resolution is quite high, so I think criticising too much is a bit unfair on the image. Cmao20 (talk) 12:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I find the girl looking into the camera disturbs the scene and the shelves should be aligned.--Ermell (talk) 21:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak support per Basile. It's a really fun image to look at. Somewhere between colorful children's utopia and superorganized commercial dystopia. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  04:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great image but has visible distortions (generic barrel + leaning outward towards the top-left corner). -- KennyOMG (talk) 21:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The girl ruins it for me--Boothsift 02:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support per Rhododendrites; technical flaws, while I acknowledge them, are not severe enough to compromise the image for me. Daniel Case (talk) 16:28, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 09:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Billie Eilish 08 10 2017 -24 (37238840341).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2019 at 23:58:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Billie Eilish performing live at The Hi Hat in Highland Park, Los Angeles, California, on Thursday, August 10, 2017.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Billie Eilish performing live at The Hi Hat in Highland Park, Los Angeles, California, on Thursday, August 10, 2017. Created by Justin Higuchi - nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 23:58, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nice live music picture. Good light, good pose, not so typical composition, audience included giving depth and vibe. Kadellar (talk) 23:58, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The singer is well caught and the people in the rear add to the atmosphere, but I find the hands on the left too disturbing.--Peulle (talk) 07:29, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Peulle.--Rocky Masum (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The hands, sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 16:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yep the hands just ruin it for me too, sorry--Boothsift 07:17, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not a bad picture, and I like how well it captures the singer herself. But the hands do spoil things, I'm afraid. Cmao20 (talk) 13:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Crop the hands out of the picture and there might have been something here. Daniel Case (talk) 01:47, 8 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Female Toque macaque with her child at Katagamuwa Sanctuary - (Don't let them fade away).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 10:31:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monkey and Child
  • If a photo is imported from another site or has another original name (given by the author) which it is know under on other sites, it is courteous to the author, and practical for online identification, keep it in some form when renaming the file to comply with Commons naming policy. This can of course be disregarded if the original name is highly offensive. In this case I figured we could keep the original like this when I renamed it, but it can be altered if you think it's better. --Cart (talk) 14:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • I see what you mean about the file name, but that doesn't concern me so much as the comments on the image page. 'Nature always belongs to those who nurture, care and protect it. But the humans have forcefully claimed it theirs and are on a path of destruction: destroying jungles, waterways and evicting the rightful owners, the wild animals.' Of course it's a perfectly respectable position to hold, but I think the place for these comments is on one's personal website or blog or on a social media site, not on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 16:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • As long as it is quite clear (which it is) that the comment is strictly the author's and not the Wiki-project's, I think it's ok to keep it if it's not offensive. Photographers always have things to say about their photos, and when they become noted, we even quote them in articles. --Cart (talk) 17:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Because of the eyes. --Axel (talk) 15:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 16:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cool! ;-) Yes there is noise in the sky, but still at acceptable level. --A.Savin 20:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because of the CA.--Peulle (talk) 21:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: would support if CA are fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great picture, unfortunately very distracting CAs, even at thumbnail size -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 06:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Even considering the technical issues mentioned above, to me it’s simply a really great shot with tons of wow. --Kreuzschnabel 18:05, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KennyOMG (talk) 21:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per the CA and the author using not only the image page but the filename itself for advocacy. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Just commenting to object to "advocacy" coming up at all in this FPC. "Don't let them fade away" isn't political. Saying that a species going extinct is a bad thing, even in more impassioned words than that, is not advocacy in the pejorative sense we typically mean when Wikimedians use that term. If the comment on the file page violates Commons policy, that can be addressed, but I don't see why it should have any bearing on FPC. If it violates policy, deal with it through the proper channels. Failing it at FPC won't address it and it has nothing to do with the image itself. To be clear, I don't intend this to change anyone's mind; the CAs haven't been fixed, and I'm clearly here commenting rather than supporting. — Rhododendrites talk |  05:53, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I have to oppose this per others sorry--Boothsift 07:21, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 09:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. --Hockei (talk) 06:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 11:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

File:In Val d'Orcia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2019 at 20:17:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A hay bale in the Crete dell'Orcia Nature Reserve, Tuscany, Italy
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Italy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by JP Vets - uploaded by JP Vets - nominated by B2Belgium -- B2Belgium (talk) 20:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 20:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yep... Okay... ummm... Yep. -- KennyOMG (talk) 22:13, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seven Pandas (talk) 01:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:50, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Looks as if it's about to roll away. Charles (talk) 08:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lines, lines, lines... :) --Cart (talk) 08:23, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good! Maybe change the filname (as soon as the FP voting is over) to something more meaningful: “Bale of straw in Val d'Orcia.jpg” or so … --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 10:03, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Very nice, but more space at the left is desirable. --A.Savin 11:11, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Axel (talk) 13:21, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 21:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 09:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral IMO not enough space at the left. Should be at least the same as at the bottom. --XRay talk 11:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very dramatic image with immediate wow. Cmao20 (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yiyi (Dimmi!) 17:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 09:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 10:16, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 22:42, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places#Italy

File:Monument afsluitdijk en omgeving 28-06-2019. (actm.) 33.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2019 at 15:30:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support though noise is just a tad higher than ideal for an ISO 100 daylight shot; maybe increase the masking in the sharpening tool? -- King of ♠ 22:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Three hugly poles in front of an empty sea and an empty sky? Sorry, I don't see the point. Regards, Yann (talk) 02:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 10:15, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support impressive love the composition Seven Pandas (talk) 19:54, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:06, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:43, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Like Yann, I don't see anything but three normal poles--Boothsift 02:50, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reminds me of Cart's work. Daniel Case (talk) 21:48, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulphere 09:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects#Other objects in landscapes

File:Common green forest lizard (Calotes calotes).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2019 at 01:56:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Calotes calotes