This is a Featured picture. Click here for more information.

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Panoramic view of Montreal

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Panoramic view of Montreal, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2017 at 18:27:00 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Set of panoramic views of the city of Montreal from Mount Royal, Quebec, Canada. All by me, Poco2 18:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm aware that not long ago ArildV successfully nominated a similar set but I'd still like to give it a try. I enjoyed the lighting of both and that lightnings gives the night image a special touch, I believe. Poco2 18:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 18:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. I hope that lightning didn't get close to you. Was it really a good idea to stay on the top of Mont Royal and shoot in that situation? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
    Ikan, I assure you that I've been in dangerous situations to get the shot I was aiming, but this one was none of them. The lightning is further than you could think. Indeed, it didn't rain where I was standing. Poco2 20:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - WOW!! Add points for creativity, and prearranging a lightening bolt!! Atsme 📞 22:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow!!! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Superb. PumpkinSky talk 01:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per others. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 05:24, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Check all lights in night shot, all lights are problematic, like you moved camera, was this same lens like that monument !? --Mile (talk) 08:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose big wow, but the daylight pic had not the best lighting conditions and per Mile: almost all lights (even the lighting) on the night shot have artifacts. --Ivar (talk) 17:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Impressing.--Ermell (talk) 20:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As someone else who was at Wikimania, I can say that you couldn't be too choosy on that day about the light (Or, why this year's Wikimania group photo had to be taken a day later, in a less desirable location) Daniel Case (talk) 00:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Somehow these photos make the city look alive and that can't be said about many panoramas. --cart-Talk 07:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zhangzhugang (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 21:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --fedaro (talk) 19:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:46, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 12:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada