Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2025 at 11:51:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info Trees reflected on building windows, Conde Valbom Avenue 30, Lisbon, Portugal. Created and uploaded by Jules Verne Times Two, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 11:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I love how this image plays with our perception. On the one hand there is the almost perfect reflection of the treetops; one could think that we see them through the windows and not just their reflection on the windowpanes (cf. this photo in which the central window is closed). On the other hand there is the central open window which destroys the illusion – but also reinstates it on a higher level because its windowpane reflects again the same treetops plus the window frame, adding a sense of three-dimensionality to the composition. This combination reminds me of some graphics by M. C. Escher. -- Aristeas (talk) 11:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Aristeas, thank you for the nomination and for the nod to Escher! One of my favourite childhood memories is watching my dad draw Escheresque tilings, and when I was a bit older I became fascinated by his math-inspired works --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support Artistically awesome, in my view. The reflection is great, the composition fantastic, the central panel marvelous, the light very good, and the quality fine -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Amazing and very interesting work. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 15:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2025 at 11:20:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1980-1989
- Info created and uploaded by Allan Warren, nominated by Yann
- Info Sammy Davis was an American singer, dancer, actor, vaudevillian and comedian whom critic Randy Blaser called "the greatest entertainer ever to grace a stage in these United States". FP on English Wikipedia.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 11:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 15:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2025 at 10:50:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 10:50, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 10:50, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Great! --Yann (talk) 10:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Fernando (talk) 13:02, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 15:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 19:35, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2025 at 07:13:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1880-1889
- Info created by Amory Nelson Hardy – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good, characteristic portrait of an interesting person, excellent restoration. – Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2025 at 05:37:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Xylariaceae
- Info Xylaria hypoxylon (candlestick fungus) on an erosion field next to a path where logs are stored and cut. The mushrooms grow on the wood chips between the boulders.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:37, 25 January 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:37, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think the image is excellent, but shouldn't the filename include the species, not just where it was shot, per Commons:File_renaming#fr-location-only? Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestion. I would like to change the file name, but I don't know if that is allowed during the voting period.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Agnes, it is correct that you should not change a file name during the nomination, unless you know exactly how to change the code too. But if you like, just write what new name you want for your file and I will fix everything for you. Please 'ping' me if you want it done. --Cart (talk) 12:18, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi*:@Cart, Great that you want to change the name. I think the new name should be: File: Xylaria hypoxylon (candlestick fungus) location, Val_Sinestra._14-10-2024._(actm.)_01 Or something like that. Thank you in advance. Greetings from Friesland from--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:46, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll get right on it. — Ta-daaah! --Cart (talk) 15:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- That was really fast...Thanks.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:54, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll get right on it. — Ta-daaah! --Cart (talk) 15:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi*:@Cart, Great that you want to change the name. I think the new name should be: File: Xylaria hypoxylon (candlestick fungus) location, Val_Sinestra._14-10-2024._(actm.)_01 Or something like that. Thank you in advance. Greetings from Friesland from--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:46, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Agnes, it is correct that you should not change a file name during the nomination, unless you know exactly how to change the code too. But if you like, just write what new name you want for your file and I will fix everything for you. Please 'ping' me if you want it done. --Cart (talk) 12:18, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestion. I would like to change the file name, but I don't know if that is allowed during the voting period.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good, educative photo of this interesting species – it looks like some weird sci-fi artefact.– Aristeas (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2025 at 23:37:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Unsorted
- Info Arenal Volcano [panorama] in Alajuela Province, Costa Rica. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 09:41, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Not sure that branches in the right corner are ok for me in such view, but the photo gives an overall good impression. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 15:12, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cool photo of that hot volcano. IMHO the branches in the right corner are OK because they are sharp and nicely bent by the wind, looking like a visitor afraid of the volcano … – Aristeas (talk) 19:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2025 at 22:52:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco
- Info created by User:Mounir Neddi – uploaded by User:Mounir Neddi – nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 22:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 22:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2025 at 15:09:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
- Info created by Harry Warnecke and Robert F. Cranston, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Info Gene Autry, American actor, musician, singer, composer, rodeo performer, and baseball team owner, nicknamed the Singing Cowboy, 1942.
- Support Also very few color portraits from this period. -- Yann (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent quality Cmao20 (talk) 16:30, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 06:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hm. On the one hand, it might be a little oversaturated, on the other hand, it's a perfect imitation of Technicolor, so suitable for a person whose colour films were in the Technicolor era. Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- All color carbro prints have very vibrant colors. Yann (talk) 10:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fair. Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:54, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- All color carbro prints have very vibrant colors. Yann (talk) 10:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 15:12, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:46, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2025 at 20:24:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Otariidae (Eared Seals)
- Info created by Kingsmasher678 – uploaded by Kingsmasher678 – nominated by Kingsmasher678 -- Kingsmasher678 (talk) 20:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I think this is an adorable and well taken picture, though I am biased. -- Kingsmasher678 (talk) 20:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Hi and welcome! I've fixed the gallery for you since you are new here at FPC. You need to specify the gallery section too. I also see that this and a lot of your photos are uncategorized. That is a must for FPs and I suggest you get on with adding such to your photos. Please remember that categories are not tags. You can read more about how they work at Commons:Categories. Like so many other new users you have opted for trying out this very demanding part of Commons directly. I would suggest, like Yann has already mentioned, that you start with nominating your photos at COM:QIC to get more acquainted with how things work here. It can be a bit overwhelming otherwise. Anyway, best of luck! --Cart (talk) 21:08, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Also, please do not remove nominations from this list once they are added. FPCBot will take care of them and they are all archived. I have taken care of that manually for you now. --Cart (talk) 21:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, I have much more experience at the English wiki, but I'll get the hang of it! Kingsmasher678 (talk) 22:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, I've cleaned up the categories for you. You need to be as specific as possible and not over-categorize. Like I said, categories here are not tags. Take a look and see what you can learn. -Cart (talk) 00:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- I've reviewed that policy, and whew! Much different than other projects. I'll keep those guidelines in mind. Thank you so much, I genuinely mean it.Kingsmasher678 (talk) 04:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, I've cleaned up the categories for you. You need to be as specific as possible and not over-categorize. Like I said, categories here are not tags. Take a look and see what you can learn. -Cart (talk) 00:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, I have much more experience at the English wiki, but I'll get the hang of it! Kingsmasher678 (talk) 22:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Also, please do not remove nominations from this list once they are added. FPCBot will take care of them and they are all archived. I have taken care of that manually for you now. --Cart (talk) 21:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support The depth of field is a bit shallow but I like the bokeh and the overall composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The cropped head in the background, and the blurry foreground, spoil the composition, in my view. Average light and quality, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, cute seal but the headless one in the background is very distracting IMO. BigDom (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 15:12, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Basile and BigDom. Yann (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2025 at 16:54:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Belgium
- Info created by Jmh2o – nominated by Jmh2o -- JmH2O(talk) 16:54, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support It could be sharper but I think there is a lot to like here. The careful composition, the contrast between natural surroundings and industrial machinery, the frosty mood, and the splashes of orange in the near-monochrome surroundings, all work for me. Cmao20 (talk) 11:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support The composition and the mood of the photo convinced Vulcan to support. –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:08, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful!--Wieggy (talk) 15:12, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support This would normally be a boring environment, but this atmosphere works. Yann (talk) 18:14, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2025 at 16:14:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
- Info Olsufyev House, en:Dmitrov created by Mike1979 Russia - uploaded and nominated by FBilula (talk) 16:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 16:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Satisfying composition, shapes and colours Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:08, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 13:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 15:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2025 at 16:16:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info Bell tower of Church of the Exaltation of the Cross (with Church of Saints Cyril and Methodius) in en:Saint Petersburg created by Reshinna - uploaded and nominated by FBilula (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but the tower looks like it's leaning (perspective correction needed) and I don't think the quality is as good as the best night shots that have been presented here. QI and I like the light but I can't get to FP here. Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support The picture needs to be corrected, but I like it--Wieggy (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2025 at 08:47:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Plants
- Info I just discovered this artist, Ohara Koson, three days ago and soon I found this wonderful painting dominated by some blue irises and a simple gradient background. Finally a japanese painting worth to be admired! XD I cropped and rotated it a little bit. The picture is gently lended by the National Museum of the Netherlands. // uploaded by User:Mr.Nostalgic – nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 08:47, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 08:47, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent artwork Cmao20 (talk) 11:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Indeed. The reproduction is not that big, but OK here because this artwork has no minuscule details which would profit from a higher resolution. – Aristeas (talk) 11:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2025 at 06:58:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Anthozoa
- Info Magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Zanzibar, Tanzania. This anemone, native to the Indo-Pacific area, is characterized by a flared oral disc, which reaches between 20–50 centimetres (7.9–19.7 in) in diameter. The magnificent sea anemone has two feeding methods. The first one is through the photosynthesis of its symbiotic zooxanthellae, living in its tissues. The second method is through using its tentacles to stun, immobilize, and consume prey (small invertebrates, fry, or juvenile fish). Note: we have no FPs of this species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment According to WoRMS Heteractis magnifica is not the valid name for this species (most of the Wikipedia articles are not up to date in this respect, e.g. the English Wikipedia invokes only articles published before 2011!), please correct. --Llez (talk) 07:28, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- As I always do, I take Wikipedia/Commons as reference. In the movement we use that name. I cannot tell why we differ there but so long I'd stick to the convention in the movement. Poco a poco (talk) 11:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Commons is not a taxonomical and scientific guideline and not scientifically recognized. If you look at the German Wikipedia, you find the correct name according to WoRMS. --Llez (talk) 13:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm getting confused, is this a showstopper for this nom? Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- I would only support if the description and the name are correct. Yann (talk) 18:16, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 10:30, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support, but I agree with Llez on the necessity of checking the species name in an updated database, and en.wiki may not always be the right one. In this case, Radianthus magnifica is the accepted name, while Heteractis magnifica is not. --Harlock81 (talk) 20:11, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support A great photo. The file name can of course be changed after the nomination is over, so no issues with supporting now. Cmao20 (talk) 11:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Vulcan agrees with Cmao20, the file name can be amended after the nomination process is finished. –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 05:40, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 11:57, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2025 at 19:28:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1930-1939
- Info A very interesting 1935 high-defined and professional photo from the famous netherlandish photographer Willem van de Poll, reuniting in a single shot not only a typical german metro station, but also an UFA-palast (a typical former german cinema) and many great urban lights over the street. (I also tought about a different candidate, this - for which I am also happy to receive feedbacks - but then I chose the one proposed) // Uploaded by User:Janericloebe – nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 19:28, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 19:28, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good choice. Terragio67 (talk) 21:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment A few spots to be removed for FP status. Yann (talk) 16:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann, is there something that may be corrected? LucaLindholm (talk) 17:18, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done I removed some UFOs in the sky and other small defects, starting from the original TIFF with less compression. Honestly, I don't think this is FP material: we have thousands of such pictures, usually with much less noise. Yann (talk) 18:09, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann, is there something that may be corrected? LucaLindholm (talk) 17:18, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The sign is cut at the top. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Stylish Cmao20 (talk) 11:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good quality for its time, good scan, and I like how the photo combines some of the glamour of Berlin in the early 1930s with hints to the dark times which were already beginning then – you can read “Adolf-Hitler-Platz” above of the way down to the underground, and the threatening movie ads at the right are very fitting. – Aristeas (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2025 at 16:43:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
- Info High quality, well-lit photo of a beautiful temple. Two FPs of other parts of this temple but they are very different in composition and subject. created by Basile Morin – uploaded by Basile Morin – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:38, 22 January 2025 (UTC) 18:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Cmao20, for the nomination. (I like the flowers of the foreground) -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:59, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 20:25, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support This temple has a beautiful staircase In contrast to the off-center staircase of this temple.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support A little off-centre but a very pleasant view. BigDom (talk) 05:41, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Coat of arms on the windows of St. Niklaus Gstaad
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2025 at 13:39:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Families: Würsten, Baumer, Von Grünigen, Reichenbach, Von Siebenthal
-
Families: Bach, Russi, Hauswirth, Marti
-
Families: Matti, Reuteler, Schöpfer, Mösching
-
Families: Raaflaub, Hutzli, Wehren, Müllener
-
Families: Zumstein, Aellen, Haldi, Zingre
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Sets of stained glass windows
- Info The windows in the nave of the St. Nicholas Chapel in Gstaad have a special feature: the main theme is not religious motifs, but 21 coats of arms of long-established families of the town. While the only window on the north-east side (the first in the row) still has a religious theme at the center, surrounded by five family coats of arms, the four windows on the south-west side (the following ones) do not contain any religious images, but rather profane ones, each with four family coats of arms. Created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Wieggy (talk) 15:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose To me one more set of ordinary things. I don't see what is special about it (the description doesn't make it extraordinary at all IMHO). Furthermore the first image is completely different to the others resulting in a strange set. Regarding the images: I see sharpness issues and partially low resolution, and also too much noise probably after lifting the dark areas. Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Unlike you, I find it extremely unusual that the windows of a church show hardly any religious images, but a lot of secular ones. I have never seen this in any other church. The differences in the set are due to the fact that the northeast side only has 1 window (the first in the series), while the southwest side has 4, which are different from the window on the northeast side. In order to show all the coats of arms, the set must therefore necessarily contain 2 different types of windows. --Llez (talk) 09:05, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I like the set. It looks interesting for me. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support-- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:14, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2025 at 07:11:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones and fossils#Family : Hominidae
- Info Catacombs of Paris, France. These underground ossuaries hold the remains of more than six million people. It was created beginning in 1774 as part of the effort to eliminate the effects of the city's overflowing cemeteries and from 1788, nightly processions of covered wagons transferred remains from most of Paris's cemeteries to a mine shaft. Note: we have already a FP of the catacombs of Paris but a completely different shot, see here. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating and macabre Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 15:12, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20; good quality for the difficult circumstances. – Aristeas (talk) 15:17, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC) 18:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support This nearby site located at the Denfert Rochereau metro station is always very busy from the outside with a long queue when I walk past it in Paris, but the inside is definitely worth the visit, I feel. Thanks for making me want to go and discover! High resolution, excellent level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:17, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 05:40, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2025 at 17:40:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:40, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:45, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Satisfying composition but IMO a bit small for FP Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I like the combination of a symmetric view of a symmetric building with the opposite gradients: in the sky from light to dark, on the ground from dark to light. @Rbrechko: Do I understand correctly that this is a panorama with cylindric projection? If yes, I would suggest to add
{{Panorama|1=Vyshnivets Palace|4=cylindric}}
to the description page, right below the {{Location}} template, this helps people to understand the image better. Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 15:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)- Done Yeah, this is the panorama. I've added appropriate information. Thank you. --Rbrechko (talk) 00:40, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice building but the composition doesn't work for me, too much foreground and empty sky, sorry. BigDom (talk) 05:43, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2025 at 11:34:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Ontario
- Info: eastern wild turkey tracks on the bank of a small stream. Minimalist, but evocative composition, in my opinion -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good composition Cmao20 (talk) 14:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Fair COM:VI candidate, maybe? Sorry I struggle to find something extraordinary here for FP, whether it's the subject matter or the scenery -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2025 at 11:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2020-now
- Info Damage following an Israeli airstrike on the El-Remal area in Gaza City on October 9, 2023. Significant historical and journalistic value, capturing the impact of Israel–Hamas war in Gaza. Featured image on English and Arabic Wikipedia. Image used in more than 50+ wikipedia pages across various languages and projects: Israel-Hamas War, War crimes in the Israel–Hamas war, Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip, Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present), Domicide and more.
- Created by WAFA (Q2915969) – Unnamed correspondence with Wiki Palestine – uploaded by Batoul84 – nominated by -- ~redmyname31~💬 11:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- ~redmyname31~💬 11:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Very strong subject, but the image quality is low. Overprocessed due to the use of a smartphone camera (iPhone 11). --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:47, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support This will be History, can't be taken again, so good enough for me. Yann (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 21:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Low quality --Wieggy (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment The image may not be of the highest quality, but it showcases the journalism in conflict zones, documenting devastation and providing unfiltered accounts under extreme conditions. ~redmyname31~💬 14:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Given the circumstances, Vulcan can accept the technical shortcomings of this image –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support per Redmyname31 and Vulcan. – Aristeas (talk) 15:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC) 18:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 18:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:16, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2025 at 05:39:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Magnoliaceae
- Info Oddly shaped, rain-soaked fruit of a Magnolia Focus stack of 55 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 21 January 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:44, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:59, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 21:52:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Japan
- Info Mount Fuji from an angle I'd never seen before. I love what the wide angle lens and the sweeping clouds do to this picture. Shockingly there are actually no FPs of Fuji yet. created by Ximonic – uploaded by Ximonic – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 21:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 18:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Perissodactyla_(Odd-toed_ungulates)
- Info Baird's tapir mother and baby (Tapirus bairdii). This is an endangered species, with only about 5,000 left in the world. They are furthermore famously secretive and primarily nocturnal. As a result, we have very few photos of this species at all outside of zoos. In fact, a google image search of a mother and baby returned almost exclusively zoo images. This was a stroke of luck: We went on a hike and found most of the park closed due to flooding. We explored where we could, seeing almost nothing outside of wet plants. Just when we were hiking back out and writing off the day as an "authentic rainforest weather experience" we saw these tapirs foraging in the distance. Apparently sometimes on especially rainy days they're seen during daytime hours. After a short while of standing still and watching these two, they decided to cross the path right in front of us. For the rest of the trip, we'd mention this experience to guides/locals, and none had ever seen a baby in the wild before (and adults only a handful of times). Extraordinarily lucky, memorable experience. Anyway, this is all to say "I know it's dark and rainy, but I think it's worth the feature anyway". :) all by — Rhododendrites talk | 18:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 18:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support A little noisy but we are lucky to have a high quality photo of this endangered and reclusive species. Cmao20 (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the picture and the story. Yann (talk) 10:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. Thanks. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:38, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 05:47, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Fernando (talk) 13:04, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 16:01:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
- Info Harry Warnecke and Gus Schoenbaechler / restored by Wcamp9 (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC) – nominated by Wcamp9 -- Wcamp9 (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Wcamp9 (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Cool photo of an iconic man but I can see a few scratches and flaws in this image Cmao20 (talk) 22:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 16:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Harlock81, Cmao20, Wieggy, VulcanSphere, Llez, Agnes Monkelbaan, MZaplotnik, and Thi: I did again the restoration from the TIFF with less compression. Yann (talk) 19:46, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Better result. Thanks. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Vulcan has acknowledged the restoration, his vote stays. –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support last version. --Yann (talk) 19:46, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you fory our work, Yann. – Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 15:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Canada
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by IrksomeBuccaneer2635. Aerial view of the Saint-Patrice Parish Church in Rivière-du-Loup, Quebec, Canada, January 2025. -- IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Well composed aerial photo. I like the wall of cloud that seems to be rolling in from the distance. Quality is adequate considering high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 22:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Per Cmao20. --Rbrechko (talk) 01:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Oppose8,064 × 4,536 pixels from a DJI-FC8482 dronethat takes maximum 4032 x 2268 pixels? Please upload the original file. This version is unnecessarily "heavy", in my view-- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)- The DJI Mini 4 Pro (FC8482) captures photos at a native resolution of 8064 × 6048 pixels. This image is the original file, unaltered. Official specs here.
- Best regards,
- -- IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 02:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Support(Apologies. A quick search on Google misled me.) Nice light and composition. Though not very sharp, and noisy sky. Question Can you fix the perspective, so that the walls become vertical? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral not done after 4 days -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Very nice view with beautiful winter atmosphere. – Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:12, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Quality is not the best but the light and snow make up for it. BigDom (talk) 05:46, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Arona-Two-Green-Doors-2024.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 10:30:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
- Info Two green wooden doors in the historical centre of Arona, Tenerife. The photo has already been nominated before, but was {{FPD}}ed. Created and uploaded by Tuxyso, (re-)nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I like the discreet charm of decay in this image. The two wooden doors, similar but distinct, with their peeling paint and varying shades of green; the wall with its damaged plaster that reveals the irregular stonework inside it; and that casually installed cable join together to a little painting with beautiful colours. -- Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Prachtig! per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I love the colors, the atmosphere, the composition ... I love the picture! --Kritzolina (talk) 19:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 19:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Kritzolina. I love the contrast between the decay and the bright colours. Excellent composition, creative and unusual Cmao20 (talk) 21:57, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Great, like 1, 2, 3. Decay, mood -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support They are green-coloured (Vulcan's favourite colour), they are doors, and yet they contrasted with each others –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 05:15:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Dramatic sky, beautiful reflection and great atmosphere. I also really like how the little plants in the paddy field blend with the reflection. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful sunset scenery with high level of details. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 15:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support For me a very special, beautiful photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 20:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I can see why you live in this country. The light in your Laotian landscapes is like nothing I've ever seen. Cmao20 (talk) 21:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. We have beautiful sunsets here, really spectacular sometimes, especially during the monsoon, when the weather is constantly changing with big variations of clouds, at different altitudes. It is sometimes even richer than here, but it does not always happen when the rice is at this height, low enough to preserve the mirror effect of the water. The rice here is planted only once a year, it grows extremely fast, and in the space of only a few days it is already high enough to camouflage the reflection -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Paracel63 (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Oh, the sky is majestic! –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2025 at 08:40:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 08:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- imehling (talk) 08:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Unusual composition but I really like it, with the mist over the hills, the choice to feature a lot of sky adding a real sense of openness and space - some parts of this panorama are sharper than others but overall I think it deserves the star Cmao20 (talk) 14:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Innovative composition yes, but too much sky, in my view, and unappealing light. Also cluttered content with branches obstructing the buildings at the right, and the water at the left -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile about the light and above about the obscured buildings behind the trees, that spoils the composition IMHO, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 22:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Basile ans Poco. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile, sorry. --Fernando (talk) 13:04, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2025 at 04:45:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support We have very few FPs from South Korea, and the number of Buddhist temples, compared to Western religious buildings, is extremely small. -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cool temple, high quality Cmao20 (talk) 14:16, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Good picture, little magic. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent detail resolution. I also like the few people in the scene, they add a scale and act like (are?) actual participants in a ceremony, not just strolling tourists. – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, they "are" actual participants. I was almost the only tourist here, besides, all the other people around were there for spiritual reasons. Thank you very much. The paintings were indeed splendid. I was amazed. The only problem is that the site opens rather in the middle of the day, and therefore not early enough in the morning for a softer light. But it was a fantastic day weather-wise, with a lot of sunshine -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment The roof point on the right is significantly higher than the roof point on the left. The staircase also appears to be crooked in front of the building.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fixed Thank you, Famberhorst, for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I still see a significant difference in the height of the roof points on the left and right.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- No worry, it's okay now in my view. Thanks, anyway, for the significant improvement -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:38, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2025 at 16:04:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Finland
- Info: Pikku Mustasaari island viewed from Iso Mustasaari island, with Helsinki's central part faintly visible in the background; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Very good! Юрий Д.К 05:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Is the horizon straight? It doesn't look right to me, especially at the right hand side Cmao20 (talk) 14:15, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done: yep, it was off; corrected. Thanks for noticing! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support thank you! Cmao20 (talk) 22:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Too tight on top. Let the poor thing breathe! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:43, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Have to agree with Alvesgaspar, sorry. Any chance to get a more generous top crop, i.e. more sky? – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Alvesgaspar Poco a poco (talk) 21:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Alternative
- Info: offering an alternative with cloned sky @Юрий Д.К., Cmao20, Alvesgaspar, Aristeas, and Poco a poco: --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 17:22, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:54, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the alternative! – Aristeas (talk) 14:54, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2025 at 08:31:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
- Info created by Mustang Joe, uploaded and nominated by me Юрий Д.К 08:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 08:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Amazing place and deserves an FP, quality is good although bottom right corner is blurry Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Very interesting place and landscape architecture, good perspective and quality. The dim light is a bit unfortunate though. - Aristeas (talk) 09:41, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose It needs a perspective correction, I'd support when done. Poco a poco (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: Hi. Sorry for long delay, but what wrong with a perspective? I've watched the image for some minutes but I can't find any perspective issues. Юрий Д.К 08:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Look at both sides, the verticals are leaning out --Poco a poco (talk) 17:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:53, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support per Aristeas. BigDom (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2025 at 08:27:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Russia
- Info GES-2 cultural center at night. 6 seconds exposure. Created by me Юрий Д.К 08:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 08:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Impressive and beautiful night scene. Partially a little bit soft due to noise removal, but that’s typical for night scenes; maybe there are some tiny CAs, but IMHO not important. – Aristeas (talk) 09:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Nice, there is some CA at the far right, I added a note --Poco a poco (talk) 11:43, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Agree. New version ready. Юрий Д.К 11:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good composition and quality Cmao20 (talk) 14:12, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Good enough quality, boring composition, too tight crop. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:55, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 20:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:44, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:19, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Not special enough for me, although a nice idea --A.Savin 11:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Alvesgaspar. BigDom (talk) 05:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2025 at 17:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
- Info The Belle Époque Rhône paddle steamer will be a centenary watercraft in 2027. Fast moving side view created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral can't say I'm fond of the sky. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your opinion. I would like and could lighten the sky, (and maybe I will try delicately later), but I risk ruining texture and details of the subject upper part: It is rare to be able to focus well on a moving boat... Terragio67 (talk) 06:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- I reprocessed the white-balance and brightened the sky a little. Maybe I could have dared more? I don't know, but the result is already visibly better. Thank you. Terragio67 (talk) 06:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:50, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Let the poor thing breathe! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose File:Bateau à vapeur Rhone à aubes Belle Époque Rhône sur le lac Leman en Suisse.jpg too similar. And crop very tight at the left, as part of the composition. See Lead room. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Basile - the bow of the ship needs more space in the frame and there is already another image of this same ship that is already FP/QI/VI. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 05:08, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, too tight, messing lead room Poco a poco (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:48, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:58, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with others that the crop is too tight, sorry. BigDom (talk) 05:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2025 at 14:27:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 14:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 14:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 05:10, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Image quality not good enough, lighting and colours look unnatural -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Wieggy (talk) 23:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Mon 20 Jan → Sat 25 Jan Tue 21 Jan → Sun 26 Jan Wed 22 Jan → Mon 27 Jan Thu 23 Jan → Tue 28 Jan Fri 24 Jan → Wed 29 Jan Sat 25 Jan → Thu 30 Jan
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Thu 16 Jan → Sat 25 Jan Fri 17 Jan → Sun 26 Jan Sat 18 Jan → Mon 27 Jan Sun 19 Jan → Tue 28 Jan Mon 20 Jan → Wed 29 Jan Tue 21 Jan → Thu 30 Jan Wed 22 Jan → Fri 31 Jan Thu 23 Jan → Sat 01 Feb Fri 24 Jan → Sun 02 Feb Sat 25 Jan → Mon 03 Feb
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.