Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Illustration Workshop Ark-icon.png   Map Workshop Ark-icon.png   Photography Workshop Ark-icon.png   Video and Sound Workshop Ark-icon.png  

Nuvola apps package graphics.svg Illustration workshop


This workshop is part of the Graphics Lab, a project aimed at picture retouching to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. More information about the lab can be found on its main page and requests pages (Illustrations ; Photographs ; Maps ; Video and Sound). To ask questions or make a suggestions, see the talk page of the graphic lab page.

This specific page is the requests page for the Illustration Workshop. Anyone can make a request for an illustration to be created or improved. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.

Make a request

See also[edit]

Filing cabinet icon.svg
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days. For the archive overview, see /Archive. The latest archive is located at /Archive/2016.Template:Autoarchive resolved section/parameter timecompare set to 'resolved'

Revise elements of coat of arms[edit]

Article(s): en:Coat of arms of the Philippines

Would somebody be willing to rework the lion and eagle on this coat of arms? They're quite poorly drawn... Here's the official rendition of the arms by the government: [1] (you can zoom in to see the proper detailing...) Many thanks. --WikiEditor50 (talk) 08:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

Stock-brush-red.svg Request taken by Goran tek-en (talk) 17:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

genericized WikiProject Scouting emblems[edit]

Article(s): WikiProject Scouting

please create free-use [[WikiProject Scouting (name of country).svg]] using the genericized emblems, thanks (none of these match existing emblems, but they will be clearly recognizable as to meaning)… Creativity is welcome, I just laid out the basic outline!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:04, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
A Wikigraphist friend e-mailed me and asked "why do you need this? wouldn't the flags be enough?" Good questions-here's why:

1) -we've been having some users make their own userboxes for their own country's Scouting, which is great except they've been using their country's copyrighted logos. ☹ This covers every country we have members in. I would think flags are okay, but they are using the emblems.

2) there are Scouting WikiProjects in several languages, so these could be used by multiple Scouting WikiProjects

3) the colors for Germany are not Austria, they are based on the original German Scouting

--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

alcohol content[edit]

Article(s): en:Unit_of_alcohol#Quantities

The axes of this graph could be expanded greatly so as to cover beer (lower %, higher volume) and spirits (higher %, lower volume).

Sensible axes to encompass these drinks would probably be 3-50% ABV, and volume 20mL to 500mL. The x-axis should also have a label stating the units of ABV, (i.e. %) -- 13:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Graphist opinion(s)

The horizontal axis is labelled "Alcohol content, by volume". But no units are given. I suspect that what it shows is not volume, but percentage of alcohol, calculated by volume. If that is right, a better label would be "Percentage alcohol (ABV)". Maproom (talk) 09:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Flags of the Provinces of Sri Lanka[edit]

Article(s): Sri Lanka, Provinces of Sri Lanka, and many related articles and nav templates.

Please assist to create accurate/proportional SVG versions of the nine main administrative regions (Provinces) of Sri Lanka. The current available images are listed above. Thanks in advance! Rehman 23:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

Anatomy: Hypophyseal portal system[edit]

Article(s): en:Hypophyseal portal system, de:Hypophysenpfortader, en:Superior hypophysial artery, …


Create an SVG-version of picture 1, add details from the Gray-Picture 2 and 3. Later, the created SVG or derivatives of it could also depict come pathways like those in picture 4 ScotXW (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2016 (UTC) Some information:

Graphist opinion(s)


Article(s): Presidential transition of Donald Trump & others

Regardless of your opinion on Trump, can someone please vectorize this logo? I have was able to convert it, but cannot figure out how to convert the image coding to SVG text format... --Corkythehornetfan 04:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

4 Game Boy logos -- SVG-ize and add transparency[edit]

Article(s): w:en:Game Boy line, w:pt:Linha Game Boy, and w:es:Línea Game Boy

Please SVG-ize these 4 logos and convert their white backgrounds to transparent backgrounds.
The transparency would improve the appearance of the table in w:en:Game Boy line, w:pt:Linha Game Boy, and w:es:Línea Game Boy, because the current white background is contrasting with the gray color that is used in the "wikitable"-style table headers. (these articles contain other GB logos, but the ones that I did not mention are already SVG files with transparent background)
I am just asking for SVG-ization because these images already have the box saying "This logo image could be recreated using Vector graphics as an SVG file." and maybe it could be part of the process of removing the white background anyway, but for the current stated purpose, I feel that having a transparent background takes precedence over SVG-izing; I guess you don't need to SVG-ize if you don't want, though that would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Daniel Carrero (talk) 01:38, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

Making the links to the galleries more obvious on the Commons:Featured_pictures page[edit]

Hi, I've been working with some people in publishing and social media at UNESCO (where I work) and all of them have found it incredibly useful for finding suitable images, however many of them have missed the link to the gallery of more images and misunderstood that the images on this page were all that was available. Would it be possible to come up with a way to make the more>> button more prominent? Perhaps putting the links inside buttons of some sort (perhaps like the more details button in media viewer?). Another small request would be to disable the links for the symbols next to the categories, this is confusing for non Wikimedians to click on what they assume is a category and end up with a big version of the symbol instead. --John Cummings (talk) 10:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

John Cummings I've replied to your posts on the talk page since that is a more appropriate location for this. Offnfopt(talk) 16:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment.  MaxxL - talk 11:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Design the Wikispeech logo until December 4th, vote on designs until the 11th[edit]

Hi all
The Wikispeech project is looking for an official logo. You can submit designs until the 4th of December and vote on which are you favourite logo until the 11th.
The Wikispeech project aims to create an open source text-to-speech tool to make Wikimedia's projects more accessible. You can find out more about the project, submit new logo designs and vote on existing logo designs here.
Many thanks
--John Cummings (talk) 17:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)


Article(s): en:People's Consultative Assembly & others

Can you please make a new svg logo, change the word "DPR-RI" with "MPR-RI". The logo itself still same. Thank you! --Hddty. (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

✓ Done. Bottom banner text of both DPR and MPR insignias are reworked with true text to overcome the lack of "text on path" on Wikimedia and you can freely change their font-size, font-family, position and curvature in text editor. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 03:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Hddty. (talk) 08:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Fix SVG text curvature[edit]

Article(s): Palo Alto, California

Please fix the curvature of the SVG text on the flag to better match the photograph. If there's any other fixes you can do, please feel free. --– Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 04:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

What's the font of the text in question? -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 08:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

The code says "font-family:CENTURY GOTHIC". -- MaxxL - talk 08:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done. Century Gothic is not exactly the font used in the original flag but I left the middle "incorporated" part intact. I used DejaVu Sans to replicate the text alongside the ring. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 12:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 03:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

No Tongue[edit]

Article(s): en:Coat of arms of Croatia, all sorts of Croatian/Dalmatian history articles etc. etc..

Hello guys, I'm hoping someone could take the time to add tongues to those three lions above. They're supposed to be "langued in gules" as its put in heraldic jargon, that is to say, they're supposed to have red tongues. Thank you in advance! --DIREKTOR (TALK) 10:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
No time is needed, Commons already has some "langued gules" images, I've added them to the gallery above. Maproom (talk) 19:41, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
@Maproom: No wait a sec, what I've posted are the lions used officially on the Croatian coat of arms. We can't really use the elaborate, "baroque" 19th century lion heads for contemporary reference, as its not what's used today. The only catch is that the lions ought to have tongues for the historically-accurate version. I'm working on expanding the article and would really appreciate some help, whenever someone has the time and the inclination. No rush. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 21:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done, see end of gallery above. If you want any adjustments done, length of tongues, colour of tongues, etc., just let me know, that will be easy. But I fear it will get deleted soon, that is the usual result when I upload an image that I've derived from another image already on commons. I have not been able to find a way of specifying the copyright in a way acceptable to the authorities here. Maproom (talk) 17:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
I've copied over the licence/permission template from the source image. Those might make it stick. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, Tagishsimon. Let's hope so! Maproom (talk) 10:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much indeed. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 00:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Coats of Arms from jpg. to svg.[edit]

Artcles(s): Wapen van Mol, Westmalle


Hello, I have this coats of arms uploaded in jpg. size for those who want to convert this images in svg. format? --Grasmat (talk) 11:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Graphist Opinion(s)

@Grasmat: - There is a SVG version of the Malle CoA with an inescutcheon. Doesn't this fit? -- MaxxL - talk 11:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

@MaxxL: - No, this is a different coats of arms, wich Westmalle. Westmalle was on January 1, 1977 in Malle. Malle was assigned a different coats of arms. Grasmat (talk) 15:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
@Grasmat: - I guess that this is now the real Westmalle CoA. -- MaxxL - talk 20:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
@MaxxL: - Westmalle probably had had two CoA's. But to move to the design thereof, yet thanks. Mvg, Grasmat (talk) 18:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done - -- MaxxL - talk 10:47, 8 December 2016 (UTC)


Article(s): en:Coat of arms of Croatia, en:Croatia proper, etc.

Should anyone have the time, we would appreciate if the Croatian checkerboard coat of arms (first image) could be done on a "heater" escutcheon or shield - the shape visible in the second image above. There should be no second border around the shield (like in some versions), and red squares should be first on either side. Thank you very much in advance for your effort (if anyone takes it up :)). --DIREKTOR (TALK) 21:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
P.s. There is this image, but the fields are rectangular - and they really must be squares or its not the Croatian coa. Further, I would personally appreciate it if the checkerboard was introduced on the same vector model as seen in the second image above.
The idea is to neatly and uniformly break down the (somewhat complicated) Croatian arms for the reader.--DIREKTOR (TALK) 21:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

@DIREKTOR: - An interesting challenge you have put here. The base of the CoA is an array of 5x5 squares. They fit in a Spanish shield nicely. But by its proportion it is impossible to fit a 5x5 square array in a longish 4x3 heater shield. -- MaxxL - talk 11:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

What does the blazon actually say? If it's "checqué gules and argent", then the exact number of squares in the array does not matter. Maproom (talk) 17:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't know where you read that blazon, what I read is the official blazon dated 1990-12-21. Even the English Wikipedia states:“The main coat of arms is a checkerboard (chequy) that consists of 13 red and 12 silver (white) fields. It's also informally known in Croatian as šahovnica ("chessboard", from šah, "chess").” -- MaxxL - talk 18:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Oh the exact number of fields is pretty irrelevant, historically speaking. What does have significance are the fields in the uppermost row: they have to be red on both ends. Or rather, technically they don't (from an exclusively heraldic perspective), technically they're interchangeable. Sadly though, the version where they're white was used by Croatian Nazis during WWII, and since then there's been a political meaning there.
In short, I wouldn't worry about the number of fields. Historically it really is just a "checqué gules and argent", and it doesn't technically matter how many fields there are or which colour's where. It'd just be great if the fields are about the (relative) size as in the modern-day arms, and if they begin and end with red in the uppermost row (don't want to poke any Balkan hornets' nests).
P.s The border should probably be red. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 00:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done – -- MaxxL - talk 14:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Very nice, thanks a lot! --DIREKTOR (TALK) 17:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Slavonia and Dubrovnik[edit]

Article(s): en:Slavonia, en:Dubrovnik, en:Coat of arms of Croatia, etc etc

Here's two Croatian arms that need vectorization if anyone has the time & inclination. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 18:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

Stock-brush-red.svg Request taken by  MaxxL - talk 19:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done - -- MaxxL - talk 20:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Final batch[edit]

Article(s): en:Kingdom of Slavonia, en:Coat of arms of Croatia, en:Illyrian movement, etc.

Final batch of Croatian arms in need of vectorization. I might be pushing it, but these are definitely the last ones.
(The reason Dubrovnik has these two coats of arms is, interestingly - the bleed of blue ink that was common in old documents. The blue ink coloured the white stripes and, as centuries went by, people erroneously thought that was the coa. The error was only recently discovered. The historically-accurate Slavonian arms have a proper brown marten as seen above; the black, less-detailed marten is what's present in the 1991 Croatian arms, out of size constraints I imagine.)
Anyway, this is all of them. As before, I'm just putting them out there if someone has the time. @MaxxL: thanks a lot for your work above! Once this is all done I'll use GlobalReplace to introduce SVG variants across projects. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 03:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)

Stock-brush-red.svg Request taken by  MaxxL - talk 09:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done -- MaxxL - talk 11:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)–

Stewart - Earl of Menteith coat of arms[edit]

Article(s): en:Earl of Menteith, en:Walter Bailloch and en:John de Menteith

Can somone create a coat of arms based on this file? Thank you Newm30 (talk) 16:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)