Commons:Javaslatok kiemelt képekre

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Javaslatok kiemelt képekre más nyelveken:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ha úgy gondolod, hogy egy Commonson található fotó/kép eléggé vonzó ahhoz, szerepeljen a Commons:Kiemelt képek lapon, akkor tegyél új javaslatot ez a szöveg alján levő listán. Ha kialakult egy általános konszenzus 15 napon belül, a képet feltüntetik: a Commons:Kiemelt képek lapon.

Contents

Javaslatok[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Berliner Dom, Ostseite, 160402, ako.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2016 at 12:02:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Berlin cathedral
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My intention was to show the transition between night and day. Furthermore, this view of the cathedral isn't very common. I hope you like it and I'm curious for your comments. There's one easter egg hidden in the picture. Can you find it? All by me. -- Code (talk) 12:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Code (talk) 12:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment While trying to find the eastern egg, I found a dustspot. --Hubertl 13:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • @Hubertl: Haha, very good. Can you give me a hint, please? I don't see it (maybe my display is just too dirty). --Code (talk) 14:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Ich hab´s dir eingezeichnet... --Hubertl 14:37, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Grazie. Da muss man erst zu FPC, um auf Staubflecken hingewiesen zu werden. Werde ich heute Abend korrigieren. Was ist eigentlich gerade bei euch in Österreich los? --Code (talk) 15:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Vaade Meenikunno rabale Liipsaare vaatetornist.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2016 at 11:17:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Forest in Meenikunno Nature Park

File:KosmonautFestival PrinzPi-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2016 at 10:43:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Prinz Pi at Kosmonaut Festival 2016

File:Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 160606, ako (1).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2016 at 03:30:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skyscapers at Potsdamer Platz, Berlin at the end of the blue hour
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - You're welcome. I'm very pleased to nominate such an outstanding photograph. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

*Symbol support vote.svg Support high quality blue hour shot -- Thennicke (talk) 05:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC) Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Significant (even visible in thumbnail) posterisation in the sky on the right half of the image -- Thennicke (talk) 05:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I hope you looked at larger sizes than the thumbnail. Where are you seeing it at full size? The only place where a really close inspection might see it, to my eyes, is right above the Bahnhof, but even there, if so, it's very subtle and probably a tradeoff that was necessary to have an exposure that, amazingly, got the buildings in focus and also focused the stars without trails! Larger sizes show a progression of changes in tone that is not apparent in the thumbnail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • @Thennicke: Thank you for your comment, Thennicke. It's interesting that you noted some posterization. I've been working on this picture several hours and it nearly drove me crazy because I always saw a lot of posterization in the sky, regardless which settings in LR and PS I've chosen. Then I looked at the same picture on my notebook, my tablet and my phone and found out that no posterization was visible at all. I then asked Hubertl, Diliff and Colin for their opinions before uploading the pictures to Commons. I don't have their answers here right now but I remember that none of them noted a severe posterization. Diliff said a little amount of posterization was visible and told me to add some noise to the picture to avoid posterization caused by the JPG-compression. I followed that advice. I really don't know what else I should do. I believe that in the end the quality of the picture might differ depending on which screen you're using to look at it. Maybe I'm wrong but I can't explain that phenomenon otherwise. My skills in post processing aren't that good and I'll be happy if anybody else could give me a hint on how I could even more improve the picture. BTW: Do you see the same issue on the other two pictures of the series? And P.S.: Of course the risk of getting posterization is much higher in the thumbnail than on the larger version because the thumbnail is being compressed much more. --Code (talk) 07:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • It's impossible to judge the posterisation from a thumbnail, since the thumbnail has higher JPG compression and sharpening and is created by Imagemagick on the Mediawiki server. The thumbnail is just an indication of what the full size image looks like - it is not an exact replica of it. Also, the sky has a very subtle gradient and this does sometimes cause posterisation problems that are difficult to solve, but often posterisation does not actually exist in the image itself, it's introduced by monitors with low bit depth or by monitor profiles. There is a small amount of actual posterisation but I know from experience that it's very difficult to eliminate in deep blue skies where there is limited sensor information in that range. Canon sensors are sadly inferior in that regard. The best way to avoid it is to shoot HDR or bracketed exposures, and I understand that this is not an HDR image - it is a single exposure. Tone mapping isn't always the best solution though. A common recommendation is to 'expose to the right' (of the exposure histogram). This is because the sensor contains more usable information at the brighter end. However, exposing to the right (maximising the amount information contained at the overexposed end of the RAW file right up to the point where it begins to result in blown highlights) means the photo usually looks too bright, and it then has to be underexposed again in post. This has the effect of giving you lower overall image noise and a greater ability to dig into the shadow detail. I think this image may also have benefited from a second 'overexposed' image which Code could have used the sky from, and it probably would have contained less posterisation. He could have then darkened the sky to match the 'actual' sky visible in this image. It's messy and not always easy to do, but with limited dynamic range in a Canon sensor, it's sometimes necessary. Having said all this, I don't think the posterisation is that bad. It's there, but it's not enough to worry me. Diliff (talk) 08:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • If you see some posterization, depends on which monitor you are looking at. On my better one (Iiyama ProLite) it´s almost unvisible - it´s sligthly visible on the other, both are "just" FullHD. I´m interested how it looks on a 5K monitor, so I´ll ask Johann. To say, that it is visible even on the thumbnail, it´s completely wrong, it´s visible BECAUSE of the compression of the thumbnail. But David already explained it very profound. Also Uwe may be asked (Eizo). --Hubertl 09:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Common Owl.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2016 at 16:01:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An owl seen amidst thick foliage.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Anand2202 - uploaded by Anand2202 - nominated by User:Anand2202 -- Anand2202 (talk) 16:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Anand2202 (talk) 16:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the idea, but the owl is over-exposed, and he gets a bit lost in this composition. INeverCry 17:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per NeverCry. The owl needs to be identified to species level, scientific name included. The image is overcategorized. --Cayambe (talk) 19:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - It's a nice capture, but I don't think a photo with so much unsharp vegetation in the foreground should be featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Akademie Mont-Cenis-Sonnenuntergang-2016.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2016 at 16:30:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunset at the academy building Mont-Cenis in Herne
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Although both nominations are of the same object at the same time, the perspective is very different justifying both nominations. If you disagree, please let me know.
    all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 16:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tuxyso (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow! Congratulations, Tuxyso! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I find this image more valuable than the other one. Nice capture. Anand2202 (talk) 17:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The two nominations are relevant, no worry. I support this one.--Jebulon (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 00:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 02:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I much prefer this picture, partly because the fence provides a great counterpoint to the building that's lacking in the other photo and partly because the sky is magnificent in this picture and good but not so striking in the other one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This could also go in the Natural Phenomena/Reflections category -- Thennicke (talk) 05:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support both images are great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 07:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 10:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very nice! Great color, excellent lines. Atsme 📞 14:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Akademie Mont-Cenis-Sonnenuntergang-2016-02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2016 at 16:28:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunset at the academy building Mont-Cenis in Herne
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Although both nominations are of the same object at the same time, the perspective is very different justifying both nominations. If you disagree, please let me know.
    all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 16:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 16:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per above. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like them both. INeverCry 17:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not sure it is a strategical idea to nominate both at the same time: maybe some reviewers will feel obliged to chose. Well, as for me, I support this one.--Jebulon (talk) 21:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support - I agree with Jebulon that putting these two photos back to back may not be to the advantage of the one that appeals to the viewer less. To me, the other one is pretty close to being a slam-dunk Featured Picture. This one, I'm unsure of. Overall, I think the combination of the angle between the trees and the building, the interesting view of the innards of the building's structure, the rocks and gravel path and the sunset and cloud patterns justifies featuring this picture, too, but I won't be shocked if it isn't featured, in the end. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:02, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support both images are great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 07:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 07:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 10:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 46.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2016 at 13:25:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Aerial view of the "Owlman" aka "Astronaut" is the most enigmatic geoglyph of the Nazca Lines, which are located in the Nazca Desert in southern Peru. The geoglyphs of this UNESCO World Heritage Site (since 1994) are spread over a 80 km (50 mi) plateau between the towns of Nazca and Palpa and are, according to some studies, between 500 B.C. and 500 A.D. old. Some theories affirm that this 30 metres (98 ft) figure symbolizes an alien. All by me, Poco2 13:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 13:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 13:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strange to think that the people who made this would never have seen it (unless they got to take rides in the spaceships)... Face-wink.svg INeverCry 17:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Your design on the sand of the beach of your holidays is a very well done fake : it really looks like Nazca Lines of Peru !--Jebulon (talk) 21:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zcebeci (talk) 23:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 02:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, obviously. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Atsme 📞 14:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Sayornis phoebe, Owen Conservation Park, Madison, Wisconsin May 2016.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2016 at 13:10:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Eastern phoebe (Sayornis phoebe), Owen Conservation Park, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by John Benson - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 13:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 13:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. -- Spurzem (talk) 16:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a nice photo with regard to composition and quality. But focus is not on the bird's eye - probably f11 had made life easier - you had enough buffer with ISO 100 :) --Tuxyso (talk) 19:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - The top of the head is a bit unsharp, but I'm OK with the focus not being on the eye because the entire rest of the bird is sharp, including the tail feathers. I usually see fuzzy tail feathers and miss seeing them clearly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Christian cross at Salagou Lake cf01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2016 at 11:15:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Christian cross at Salagou Lake, France

File:Admiral John Dahlgren - NARA - 528718 edit.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2016 at 09:56:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Admiral John Dahlgren, restoration.
Admiral John Dahlgren - NARA - 528718.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mathew Brady restored and nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 09:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is another portrait from the series of military leaders of the american Civil War by Mathew Brady. Please notice the wonderful quality of this image (sharpness of the face...). But the original (ca.1860 - 1865) was strongly damaged, and I submit to you the restoration work I've done here. As you can see, it was a real and difficult challenge (please open the following file at full size for comparison). Many scratches, dust, dirt, spots etc. due to age, glass broken... Rear Admiral John A. Dahlgren (1809 - 1870) is well known for beeing a great organizer of the US navy, and a world famous specialist of naval artillery -- Jebulon (talk) 09:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Great restoration. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:55, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 02:56, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Parc national de Jebel Zaghouan 30.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2016 at 08:41:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

view from the top of Mountain Zaghouan in Tunisia.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC) - uploaded by -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC) - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 13:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't care for the two big blurred flowers in the foreground. INeverCry 18:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The unsharp flower in the foreground is imho tot dominant here with regard to size and position. If you look on the photo it is the first thing you realize. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Tuxyso --Zcebeci (talk) 23:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per everybody. But I think you're getting closer to the quality we look for at Featured Picture Candidates. Your idea was terrific, and if it weren't for the unsharp flowers, it might have been a successful nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:San Girolamo dei Croati (Roma) - Ceiling.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2016 at 07:30:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Girolamo dei Croati (Roma) - Ceiling
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by LivioAndronico (talk) 07:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- LivioAndronico (talk) 07:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Of course I wasn't there, so I don't know how it looked, but the middle feels too glary. If you feel OK about decreasing the brightness a bit, I'll look again. I wouldn't want the brightness decreased too much because that's supposed to be a bright light, of course, and I don't want the surrounding frescoes to get too dark, but I also notice some glare on the gold at the top of the picture frame, so I do think some decrease in brightness is warranted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 09-14 PAN.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2016 at 16:29:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of the Siloli Desert, Bolivia

File:Camille Saint-Saëns in 1900 by Pierre Petit.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2016 at 12:28:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Camille Saint-Saëns

File:Lichen Cladonia portentosa and Hypogymnia physodes.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 21:48:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lichen Cladonia portentosa and Hypogymnia physodes
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Lichen
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Lichen Cladonia portentosa and Hypogymnia physodes from Carinthia, Austria. All by Hubertl 21:48, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hubertl 21:48, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 00:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I love that lichen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - But what's the background? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Black velvet, Chris. It´s not a studio work, I just had a table with this piece of cloth. No extra lights, all made under an big apple tree. --Hubertl 06:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
      • Thanks. A bit shallower DOF may have been nice, if that's the case, but still fine with me. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 06:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
        • It was a workshop, how to realize typical studio works - in this case focus stacking (21 single shots) - under non studio conditions. At home, I would have used a black glass plate, like this one: 20160602-Wikicup 2015 5754-short Version.jpg --Hubertl 06:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 03:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 07:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Isasza (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 07:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zcebeci (talk) 23:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Rammu saare vaade.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 20:42:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kolga bay protected area

File:Rosa Borbonica.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 18:31:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rosa Borbonica

File:Farida Arriany, c. 1960 (signed).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 13:30:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Farida Arriany, Indonesian actress

File:Plassy shipwreck 2016b.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2016 at 12:31:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Plassy shipwreck on Inisheer island

File:Kadavar-Bandfoto.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 21:42:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kadavar Bandfoto 2016
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Menschenmaterial 21:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Menschenmaterial 21:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Striking portrait. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 00:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:49, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support An excellent photograph that should be on the back cover of an album. I like the idea of putting the band in the seats, strengthening the connection with the fans. Daniel Case (talk) 13:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support When the subject is a psychedelic rock band, you'd normally expect something like this – weird colors and sweaty musicians on a stage. The muted colors of the seats, their repeating pattern, the band members sitting there with neatly brushed hair … somehow this doesn't look "right" on multiple levels, and that's what I like about it. --El Grafo (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Rosa canina Neulengbach 20160611 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 10:36:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dog-rose (Rosa canina)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Rosaceae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Close-up of Dog-rose (Rosa canina). All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I would question the depth of field because while the center of the flower is beautifully in focus, none of the petals are, but you describe this accurately as a closeup. So take this for whatever it's worth, but I would suggest cropping almost all the leaves from the photo and having the picture frame be only big enough to encompass the flower well (probably in a square frame). If you do that, I would probably support featuring the picture because the part that is in focus is a great closeup! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support more DOF under natural conditions is almost impossible for a small subject like this, focus bracketing is not possible. therefore I support this nomination. --Hubertl 01:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nicely done! Atsme 📞 03:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Love the DOF. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The image is of excellent quality, but the light conditions seem somewhat harsh to me. So I feel no wow. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Isasza (talk) 17:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 04:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 07:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too darky shades in the upper half region of the photo --Zcebeci (talk) 23:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support PLeasing composition offsets the inevitable DoF problems. Daniel Case (talk) 13:37, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Flamants roses sur le Lac de Tunis.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 09:41:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sight on lake of Tunis with flamingos
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I certainly understand that, but that explanation doesn't make the picture featurable in my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ -- Ikan Kekek I got it my friend I will make my photos better next time. --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 01:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Absolutely! Keep trying. You are a good photographer, and voting against a feature shouldn't be interpreted as a statement that this photo is not good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I can see what you were thinking you saw, but unfortunately it has turned out to be one of those that weren't all you thought they might be when you look at what you got. But it does show that you were trying. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Valahnukur, Suðurnes, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 048.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2016 at 03:55:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Valahnukur, Suðurnes, Iceland
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Diego Delso - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Diego takes so many great photos that he could sometimes use some help in getting more of them considered for a feature. I really like this view, the texture of the water and the way the light hits it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you for this nomination, Ikan! And thank you for asking for help. If somebody would like to look into potential FP candidates, you may find something here :) Poco2 14:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Those pages of potential FP candidates are amazing. Everyone would probably enjoy looking through them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 18:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Nice landscape. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition and beautiful landscape. But dull light.--Jebulon (talk) 14:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - True, the light at the top of the picture is rather white, diffuse and a bit glary. If you look directly at a closeup of that section at full size, I can see where it could be disturbing. I think it's OK in the context of the whole picture and also worth it for what it does to the other 5/6 or so of the picture, but I understand and respect your opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:38, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 03:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Isasza (talk) 17:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition but the light at the left top of the picture is relatively white --Zcebeci (talk) 23:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Two of Kongelige livgarde Amalienborg Copenhagen Denmark.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 17:37:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kongelige Livgarde Amalienborg Copenhagen
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 17:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looking "one", they are "two" ! Kongelige Livgarde at Amalienborg Palace, Copenhagen, Denmark.-- Jebulon (talk) 17:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 17:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 20:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain Due to personal involvement, but it did made me think of an FPC of yours nominated five years minus one day ago with another shadow. It appears this nomination starts out more succesfull. I am glad you have not given up on the shadows. Face-smile.svg -- Slaunger (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - That's fun. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support one or two? --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • At full size, I see two noses. Then, two. I guess.😜--Jebulon (talk) 20:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Good shot, windows above disturb, since shadow is important this could be croped as shown. Panorama suits this. --Mile (talk) 18:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks for review and comment. I could maybe agree with the idea of crop below (less than suggested), but surely not above. The window does not disturb so much IMO. It does not disturb at all, because there is anothe window "sharing" the composition--Jebulon (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Interesting effect. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ~ Moheen (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:16, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good shot in many respects. --Code (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 11:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Isasza (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Funny --LivioAndronico (talk) 07:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Makes you think about what you're really looking at for a while. Daniel Case (talk) 20:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Salagou Lake, Celles cf01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 17:32:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Salagou Lake, Hérault, France

File:2016-06-10 Blaues Wunder.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 12:24:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The picture shows the Loschwitz Bridge "The Blue Wonder" Dresden, Saxony, Germany.  The Blue Wonder is a so-called band-iron bridge. Here, the tensile forces are not transmitted by a cable or a chain, but of narrow metal strips which riveted together. These work like a rope. Since the concept has not prevailed, this bridge is an interesting historical and technical uniqueness.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by je-str - uploaded by je-str - nominated by Je-str -- Je-str (talk) 12:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Je-str (talk) 12:24, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Relatively straightforward good composition and informative description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 22:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question The field of view does not look huge, so I would be interested to know whether a rectillinear projection version would be possible. Personally, I think that would be preferable for architecture. --DXR (talk) 10:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Kann man machen, der Bildwinkel ist etwa 140 Grad. Aber die Unterschiede wären minimal, als dass sich das lohnen würde. Woran hast du eigentlich erkannt, dass es keine geradlinige Projektion ist? Je-str (talk) 16:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A QI for sure but it doesn't distinguish itself much from any other well-taken picture of a bridge. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel Case. I miss the little "+" necessary for a FP. Good picture otherwise.--Jebulon (talk) 21:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Embalse de Puente Nuevo in Cordoba.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 11:53:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Puente Nuevo power plant in a reservoir in Cordoba, Spain
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by ElBute - uploaded by ElBute - nominated by ElBute -- ElBute (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ElBute (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very good composition but very gray. Might look better as a black & white photo, as the lack of color would really bring out the excellent qualities of the variation of light and shadow and the overall composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC) - Now Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose in favor of the black & white version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:38, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I totally agree with you. I'm into artistic photography and I can tell you that this picture really works in B&W. But I didn't dare to turn it into B&W because I thought Commons users wouldn't be willing to miss colour information. --ElBute (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
      • We have featured other recently taken black & white photos before. You could create a black & white alternative and someone could put it up for a vote to see which version is more appreciated here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 00:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Embalse de Puente Nuevo (alt1).jpg

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info B&W version, as suggested by Ikan Kekek. --ElBute (talk) 17:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ElBute (talk) 08:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I prefer this version. INeverCry 17:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I prefer this version, too, and I will change my vote on the color photo to oppose if it becomes clear this alternative can get enough support for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unusual B&W panorama. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Prefer this version. Good image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 14:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and seven. --Hubertl 14:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry to break up the unanimity. Yes, the b&w version is better overall, but it is still oversharpened to me, perhaps to make up for using a wider aperture. Daniel Case (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Parque Estadual Ilha do Mel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2016 at 11:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Kendy Fujita - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Love the colours and reflections. --ElBute (talk) 11:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 20:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 07:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak support Quality isn't excellent but i like composition....and 7--LivioAndronico (talk) 07:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Qualified support Blue of sky seems a little unreal, perhaps suggesting a little too much tinkering with it in post (also supported by the thin metadata). But not a dealbreaker for an otherwise excellently composed and detailed image. Daniel Case (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:The Opening in to the Narrow Path above the Siri Bolan.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 22:01:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Opening in to the Narrow Path above the Siri Bolan from James Atkinson's Sketches in Afghaunistan
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by James Atkinson - uploaded by Atko~commonswiki - nominated by Moheen Reeyad -- ~ Moheen (talk) 22:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ~ Moheen (talk) 22:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - It looks like the lithograph is somewhat damaged, for example by highly visible foxing. I'm not sure that in this unrestored form, the condition of the image is good enough for a feature. So I'll leave that decision up to others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan. Restoration is needed. INeverCry 18:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose some chromatic fringing, and I suspect there will be text and other parts of the original presentation of the lithograph outside of the area shown - those are key parts of the image's encyclopedic value, and need to appear. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. Can we also do something about those brown spots? Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Eastern Grey Squirrel.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 19:51:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Eastern Grey Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Florida"


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Panorama of the Tiber with the broken bridge.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 14:09:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of the Tiber with the broken bridge


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Uitzicht over de Bekhofplas. Locatie, natuurterrein Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas 13.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 12:57:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View over the Bekhofplas, Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas nature preserve, Netherlands


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Las dos columnas de Hércules - Ábyla y Calpe, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 58-60 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 09:02:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sculpture of The Pillars of Hercules: Abyla and Calpe, Ceuta, Spain.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Sculpture of The Pillars of Hercules: Abyla and Calpe, Ceuta, Spain. The scultpure is a work of Ginés Serrán Pagán and dates from 2007. It's 7 metres (23 ft) and 4 tons heavy. All by me, Poco2 09:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 09:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support that's tilted! --Ralf Roleček 10:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Ralf Roleček, that made me laugh! This is a very good photo of a very good sculpture. I did a little research and found out that it was created by Ginés Serrán Pagán, who was born in Ceuta in 1949 and now lives in New York. I think it would be a good idea to add at least the name of the sculptor to the description, and ideally, also his year of birth and the year of composition of this piece. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:22, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
    Ikan: I had added some information in this nomination page but hadn't transferred it yet to the description page of the file. I did it now. Poco2 12:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A bit too dark overall for me. The sculpture doesn't stand out in this light. INeverCry 18:36, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The background is distracting and too little space at the bottom and sides (thin), and the statue seen too blue (WB). --The Photographer (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
    @INeverCry, The Photographer:: I've just uploaded a new version with improvements in crop and curves, I also cloned out a cut off bush on the left. Please, let me know what you think Poco2 18:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I like the composition, but the lighting just doesn't allow the sculpture to stand out. INeverCry 18:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I actually think the dark blue of the sculpture by comparison with the bright sky helps it stand out, but I can understand your point of view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Poco2 16:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
No había visto las correcciones, la imagen está bastante bien, pero creo que el lugar no da mucho para maniobrar. --The Photographer (talk) 16:57, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Ferrocarril en el salar de Carcote, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 70.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 08:46:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

FCAB railway crossing the Carcote salt flat, southwestern Bolivia.


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Bloemen en knoppen van Vingerhoedskruid (Digitalis purpurea). Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 04:51:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants # Plantaginaceae.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Flowers and buds of Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea). Location, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei in the Netherlands. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by User:Famberhorst - nominated by User:Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Pretty flowers, enough of the plant is sharp enough for my taste, and I find this bokeh totally fine. Nice composition, too. In short, I do think this is solidly good enough for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:32, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The dull blueish lighting of the lower part spoils it for me. We’ve got better lit photographs of this species (though few of comparable quality, admittedly). --Kreuzschnabel 09:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Isasza (talk) 17:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Such nice detail. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Barn swallow (young bird) at Tennōji Park in Osaka, June 2016 III.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 00:52:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barn swallow(young bird) at Tennōji Park in Osaka.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 00:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Laitche (talk) 00:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I may end up as the odd man out here, but I find that composition weird, because not only the bird but also the twig look like they're floating in mid-air, with no indication of solid ground anywhere in the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMeiræ 00:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 02:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I might even prefer that one. I'm also used that barn swallows have somewhat different tones, but I'd assume it's the of case of some regional differences (Estonian vs Japanise birds) and not the issue with the tones of the image. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 07:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Isasza (talk) 17:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ordinarily I might complain about there being too much dead space, but the space around the bird isn't dead ... the bokeh gives it just enough life. In fact, it emphasizes the fragility of the bird's existence. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Daniel Case (nicely put!). —Bruce1eetalk 13:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Nevuas.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 17:35:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Florence Earle Coates Platinum Print 3 - Restoration.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 17:22:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Florence Earle Coates
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by unknown photographer - scanned by Londonjackbooks - restored and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think you should restore the oval border too.--Jebulon (talk) 22:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
    • I did, compared to the original, but this photograph was pasted atop the paper from what I can tell, and excessive restoration would conceal this. I try to leave in some signs of the way an image was made. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Yes. The photo was pasted into the front pages of a volume of poetry, as scanned. Londonjackbooks (talk) 13:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Parc National de Jabal Zaghouan 177.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 07:35:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

view from the top of mountain Zaghoan
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC) - uploaded by --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC) - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I like this picture and thought of nominating it myself. However, there's a smudge a bit to the right of the left margin that should be explained. I suspect it's just a darker part of a cloud, and if so, that's no problem and I would support a feature, but please address it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - @ -- Ikan Kekek thank you ! yes it is a darker part of the cloud : you can verify that at the ame level to the right there is a similar smudge but it is clearer that it is a part of the cloud .--IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I Symbol support vote.svg Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks "too hot" (too white) due to sunlight for me. -- Pofka (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @ -- Pofka but my friend that how the shight looks like at noon in that period of the year the temperature was about 35 C° and we were at the top of the mountain. --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • @IssamBarhoumi: I know. But that is not a good timing for me. Never liked such "hot" pictures with blown colors. Maybe that's just my opinion and others will support you as they did so far. -- Pofka (talk) 14:56, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
    • @[[:User:-- Pofka|]]: Ok I got it my friend and i ll will make better next time. --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 01:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportMö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 07:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Oversaturated sky, and frankly the image is just too static. We have to choose between the cloud and the mountain, with the background mostly obscured and hazy. The cloud dominates the mountain too much IMO. And the image tries to take in too much ... perhaps a closer view of the summit, without the shade, might have had a chance. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 14:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Warszawa - synagoga z Gwoźdźca 3.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 21:36:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Museum of the History of Polish Jews in Warsaw. Reconstruction of the synagogue in Gwoździec (part)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice color and detail. Probably featurable if it were evenly lit ... as it is the dimmer areas are too distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 18:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 14:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Müstiline pärastlõuna.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 08:32:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Muraste Nature Reserve, Estonia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Kristoffer Vaikla - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 08:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 08:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Smaller than usual for a FP, but this is a beautiful photo. I'm not sure if others will be willing to overlook the small size. The rule I'm seeing is "Images should have at least 2 real megapixels of information", and this picture easily clears that, but I seem to remember others referring to a figure of 6 MP for FP. But that's except for compelling reasons otherwise. To me, this is a special photo, and it's big enough to make its effect. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose – really nice per IK but too noisy for me considering the small size, and chromatic aberration. --Kreuzschnabel 10:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I know that rules can be broken", but what about the rule of thirds, and the horizon in the middle. I feel it as a composition issue.--Jebulon (talk) 13:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - What horizon? Wherever the horizon might be, we can't see it because of the mist. I don't think that either the grass or trees constitute exactly 1/2 of the picture, but the reflexive opposition some folks here have to things that smack of divisions in two is very strange to me. The world is neither divided always in two nor in three. In order to get out of a rut, a photographer could just as well try a "rule of fifths" or a "rule of sevenths", but to cite an avant gardist in a different field, Arnold Schoenberg famously said “There is still much good music to be written in C major.” If the foremost champion of pantonality as the inevitable next stage in musical progress was that flexible, why use thirds as a crutch? I don't mean to suggest that you may not have good reasons for finding the composition wanting, but being divided in three or not being divided in two don't strike me as a good absolute rules. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. As Jebulon points out, the composition is an issue here. It looks like we're missing a necessary part of the image at top. INeverCry 18:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Not to me. This is the image the photographer desired. Someone else, if they were standing in the same place with a camera at the same time, might have taken a picture that included the further-up reaches of the trees, but why is that necessary? I think the point of this photo is to show the rays of sunlight shining through the mist between the trees and hitting the grass and the sides of some trees, and that's what it shows. Why would the addition of anything else improve the composition? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • For me, I like the trees, but I feel the photograph would be better and more balanced if more of the trees could be seen, and the grass took up the bottom third of the composition. This has an incomplete look to it for me. INeverCry 18:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Somehow, expressed this way, I can relate to your view more, though I still don't share it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Yes, this is somewhat unusual composition, but I think it works well with the current image. For me this even increases the wow factor as it makes the image more especial. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I just don't know what the subject of this image is supposed to be. Is it the silhouetted trees? If so, why are they limited to the upper right quarter? Is it everything? If so, I feel like I'm only looking at half of it, and most of it is too dark. With all this confusion, there is no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 11:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Meiosis Stages.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2016 at 21:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
@ Ikan Kekek I hoped you compare it to other images in its scope (Computer-generated/Biology). Even though it is small, it can be resized without reducing the image quality since it is a SVG. It also passed under the W3C validator without any errors. A complex illustration is quite a bit more work than a click on a camera :) Ali Zifan 03:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I don't devalue the work that went into this; I just don't find it beautiful and therefore don't believe it should be a Featured Picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very well done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Has a high EV and very well done. It is a pity that there are little FPs about this, and also, it is a SVG, meaning, you can enlarge it without reducing quality even to 10000000000000000000000000... px! -- Poké95 10:50, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Please don't forget the tips that I gave you --The Photographer (talk) 12:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well done. We need more of this kind :-) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 18:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High quality image with great content--Freshman404Talk 09:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 02:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 14:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:3 CATs.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2016 at 11:25:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Construction of Rosa Khutor Alpine Resort, Sochi.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 11:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- KSK (talk) 11:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I give this picture credit for being an unusual composition, but the image doesn't wow me and the background is too fuzzy for my taste. Interesting idea, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 17:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Pity, the idea is really good. But even the caterpillars are not sharp. --Kreuzschnabel 18:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Btw, compo would be much better with the caterpillars more to the right, looking towards center --Kreuzschnabel 06:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) German-Language-Flag.svg 11:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting composition. I can not say that the caterpillars are not sharp. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It seems as if the machines are paying homage to the wilderness ... I like the way the points of the bucket arms echo the mountain summits above. Yes, the peaks are hazed in ... but for once they're not the subject of the image, are they? Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good composition. --Ralf Roleček 09:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. I like the composition, and the cats are sharp enough for me. —Bruce1eetalk 13:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Brandslange.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 21:07:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Looks like a Wilfredo's social work. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing, really it's art and hight EV, wow. Look like a picture mine --The Photographer (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - It's a good composition, but could it be sharpened a bit? I think that compositions like this, in order to wow, probably need to be sharper, although I do note that 3 people disagree with me so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 01:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Thennicke (talk) 02:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm going to Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose this. It's a nice picture but doesn't wow me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not a special enough idea to make up for the low quality. Noisy towards the top, generally unsharp. --Kreuzschnabel 09:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
    • The "noise" at the top is soot from diesel buses and the soot is also on the white-painted bricks, the image is from a bus garage in Aarhus, Denmark. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Some still life, not bad. You should put that lamp ON. --Mile (talk) 17:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, I feel 1960's mood :) --Laitche (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice. IMO the location should be added to filename and description. --XRay talk 05:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Picture of the year (British Journal of Photography style) ;-). No honestly, refreshingly different! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Verde78 (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ali Zifan 22:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Code (talk) 17:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice forms. I like the way the clean lines and grid play off the grittiness of the setting. Daniel Case (talk) 23:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Weak support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 10:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Château de Caumont - Château Renaissance - 21 - 2016-05-14.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 13:39:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Caumont castle and its park


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Dianthus carthusianorum Neulengbach 20160611 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 05:55:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Carthusian Pink (Dianthus carthusianorum)
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Order_:_Caryophyllales
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Close-up of Carthusian Pink (Dianthus carthusianorum). All by -- Uoaei1 (talk) 05:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 05:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Respectfully Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Nice flower, but at full size, it's glary and not as sharp as some FP flowers have been. Of course, to even zoom in that much on any basis is impressive, but as interesting as the results are, I don't think they make this one of the very best photos on the site. I expect that others will disagree, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Compared with other flowers, this one is also more challenging, because it is so small: its diameter is just about 20mm. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Fair point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice abstraction. Sharp enough for me, considering the DOF being worked with here; I don't think I could have done better. -- Thennicke (talk) 06:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. While it’s really good and certainly QI/VI it lacks a bit wow to be featured, and the softness doesn’t help. --Kreuzschnabel 14:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ali Zifan 02:58, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Verde78 (talk) 09:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Mild Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 04:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:46, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 02:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Isn't the image oversaturated? Kruusamägi (talk) 20:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment These flowers are very intensive in color --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I guess it's all just a matter of taste. Daniel Case (talk) 22:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 10:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Isasza (talk) 17:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Cappadocia Chimneys - DWiW.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 19:53:45
"Fairy Chimneys rock formation, nearby Gorëme, in Cappadocia, central Turkey"

Cappadocia Chimneys Wikimedia Commons.jpg
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace -- Pine 19:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace -- Wolf im Wald 12:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Kruusamägi (talk) 15:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace INeverCry 19:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace because I think it's an improvement over DWIW's work (which was pretty good and inspired mine, but I had the advantage to start from RAW). - Benh (talk) 21:50, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace The concern I raised in my oppose during the original nomination has been sufficiently addressed. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace --Milseburg (talk) 12:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace And 10. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: X support, X oppose, X neutral → not featured. /Note: this candidate has several alternatives, thus if featured the alternative parameter needs to be specified. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC))