Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:KEB)
Jump to: navigation, search
Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten

Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.

Formalien[edit]

Nominierung[edit]

Leitsätze für die Nominierung[edit]

Bitte lies alle Leitsätze (Englisch) vor der Nominierung.

Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:

  • AuflösungFotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,93 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.
Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.
  • Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.
  • Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.
  • Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.
  • Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.
  • Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.
  • Wertunser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
    • nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
    • Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
    • schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.

Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.

  • Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.
  • Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.
  • Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.
  • Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.

Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.

  • Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.
  • Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.
  • Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.
  • Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.
  • Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.
  • Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.
  • Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.
Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.
  • Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.
Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.

Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.

Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen[edit]

Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.

Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.


Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.

Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein: Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}

Abstimmung[edit]

Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status'),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)

Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.

Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.

Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.

Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen[edit]

Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit

  • {{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
  • {{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).

Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:


In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:

  • Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
  • Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
  • Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.

Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.

Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Allgemeine Regeln[edit]

  1. Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
  2. Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  3. Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  4. Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
  5. Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
  6. Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
    oder durch Hinzufügen von {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
  7. Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
  8. Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
    1. Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
    2. Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
  9. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
  10. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
  11. Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.

Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl[edit]

Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:

  1. Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
  2. Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
  3. Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
  4. Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.

Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.

Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Vor allem sei freundlich[edit]

Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.

Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.

Siehe auch[edit]


Inhaltsübersicht[edit]

Contents

Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Seite erneut laden für neue Nominierungen: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Mosque Church in Pécs.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2017 at 15:10:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mosque Church in Pécs.jpg

File:Topi (Damaliscus lunatus topi) female.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2017 at 08:44:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Topi (Damaliscus lunatus topi) female

File:CumulonimbusMexicoP1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2017 at 02:45:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cumulonimbus, taken from a cabin windows
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by User:Cvmontuy - uploaded by Cvmontuy - nominated by [[User:{{subst:Cvmontuy}}|]] -- Cvmontuy (talk) 02:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 02:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Those are some pretty impressive clouds. -- Thennicke (talk) 05:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I wasn't thinking FP when I promoted it at QIC, but taking a closer look, I agree that it is. Excellent capture and composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Can you explain the blue and brown colour tint? Are you looking down on the clouds or across at them? I can't figure out how the clouds could get such deep colour naturally. -- Colin (talk) 06:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment And appears to be heavily processed -very soft. Charles (talk) 08:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The picture was taken from the interior of a commercial flight From Mexico-City to Villahermosa Tabasco, then
Using Raw therapee
The overexposed control was moved until some points reach white
The black control was moved until some points reach black
Noise was reduced this makes the picture a little bit softer
Temperature was change from 5024 to 5820 (I just move the control until I get a more pleasent colors)
Using Gimp
I separate the channels acording to luminosity, on dark chanel I move the color curve to add more light and more contrast
I add more contrast to the final picture.
--Cvmontuy (talk) 09:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Cvmontuy, when processing clouds, it's very rare that you want any of the pixels to be actually black. If I were you I would make the darkest point in this image a "realistic-looking" dark grey -- Thennicke (talk) 10:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now. I don't find this realistic. As Thennicke notes, not all scenes have pure white and pure black in them, so it often isn't appropriate to stretch the exposure to these limits -- high key and low key scenes for example. I think the "wow" here is really the artificial over-processing of the cloud contrast, rather than reality. And the blue/brown colours are more likely to be from adjusting temperature and/or artefacts of pushing the contrast too much. -- Colin (talk) 10:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 10:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I too like to photograph clouds and it is always very tempting to process them just a liiitle bit more since they look so cool then. Just to see what would happen, I took this photo and followed some of your processing described above (The overexposed control was moved until some points reach white. The black control was moved until some points reach black. Plus added some contrast.). I also cropped it so that the curves would not be disturbed by the ground structures. The result came out something like the nominated photo and it looks very cool but hardly natural. To get to the level displayed here, I would have to process much more. Sorry, but I can't support a cloud photo so heavily processed. Bring it back to normal, please. --cart-Talk 16:44, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Pharmacie in Paulista Avenue.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2017 at 01:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pharmacie in Paulista Avenue
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- The Photographer 01:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I thought I remembered your nominating a similar picture before, but anyway, I think this composition is an FP, and it's sharp enough for me to be fine with it. I'm not sure what the right category is, but "Food and drink" isn't right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting scene, well captured. Camera lens tests would be improved if they photographed this scene rather than some boring test chart. "The hypertension pills are extremely sharp, the anti-fungals are acceptable, but the anti-histamines are soft, and the lens needs stopping down to bring them up to acceptable levels.". Actually, I'm impressed the corners are reasonable sharp given you shot this at f/1.8. I think you could have stopped down a bit and used a slower shutter -- the boxes aren't going anywhere! -- Colin (talk) 07:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --cart-Talk 17:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Beggar Woman.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2017 at 00:22:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:22, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:22, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Thennicke (talk) 05:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very affecting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Have some dignity for other people. --Mile (talk) 08:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose With the hidden face this does not really affect me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Categories fixed. As for the objection by Mile, I don't understand why this image should show a lack of dignity or decency seeing as the face does not show. Furthermore, the subject should not be avoided for sensitivity's sake: poverty is a huge problem that seems only to grow, and Commons' role is to document such facts. Photographers must strive to find the balance between documenting people's desperate situations while not serving to actively ridicule them. If you would like to read about a more famous example, I recommend this article about the iconic image Migrant Mother.
For me personally, however, this specific image is not particularly moving. The distance to the subject is too close not to show the personal features, IMO; it's an image that I think should show the facial features of the person in question. I Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for this reason.--Peulle (talk) 10:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Peulle --Cvmontuy (talk) 14:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Crop is simply too tight for my taste, especially the sides. If the face is hidden , you need a bit more of background and context instead. (Example) --cart-Talk 16:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:South face of the Transamerica Pyramid, 2017.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2017 at 22:27:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South face of the Transamerica Pyramid
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Kind of mesmerizing, and a vast improvement over the old FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 02:48, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But seems redundant to keep the old FP - can we delist it or is that bad form? -- Thennicke (talk) 05:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - If you feel that it's no longer of the quality that we would consider an FP, you can nominate it for delisting on this page, but be prepared for less than unanimous agreement. Also, keep in mind that unlike VIC, where the title of VI is given to only one nominee per scope, on FPC, we don't need to pick only the best photo of a motif for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:2013.05.18.-28-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim-Vierfleck-Weibchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2017 at 19:54:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Four-spotted chaser - Libellula quadrimaculata, female.
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I don't see obscured parts. --Hockei (talk) 15:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles. --Mile (talk) 08:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Kia Stonic covered, IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A2536).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2017 at 18:05:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kia Stonic covered by cloth before the official world premiere at IAA 2017, Frankfurt

File:Piz Grisch Panorama beschriftet.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2017 at 15:55:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Labeled Panorama of Piz Grisch (Ferera, Grisons, Switzerland)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Capricorn4049 - uploaded by Capricorn4049 - nominated by Milseburg -- Milseburg (talk) 15:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good quality and exemplary instructive. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The weather and the view on that day was exceptional. I am often in the mountains, but I have never experienced before a day where I couldn't see any clouds or mist all around and the view in all directions was > 150 km. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 16:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Your work is amazing! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support-Masterpiece.--Ermell (talk) 20:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wonderful work. As a minor note, I'm not sure if rasterized text is the best way to display this. Perhaps it might be better to embed the JPEG in an SVG and use SVG text. That way, people with visual impairments can still read the text, it will become possible to copy and paste the text, and it can be translated to other languages more easily. dllu (t,c) 01:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per dllu. --Peulle (talk) 10:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per dllu. An example to all of us who take mountain landscape panoramas. Or try to. Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Hawaii's Stryker Brigade soldiers conduct realistic combined live fire exercise 120920-F-MQ656-684.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2017 at 06:43:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Tech. Sgt. Michael Holzworth - uploaded by - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I find a special atmosphere, both surreal and very realistic. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. The sharpening radius used is way too high here, but overall the atmosphere is too great to not support. -- King of ♠ 06:52, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing of interesting for me....sorry --LivioAndronico (talk) 07:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral In photographic terms of course this is a great picture but I'm against this military stuff. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:07, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Many people don't like spiders for example and support it because of the brilliance of the picture. Noto Emoji Oreo 1f609.svg --Hockei (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Great picture. Anyway weak because it looks like the camara-jpg and as KOH. --Hockei (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support per Hockei. --Peulle (talk) 19:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Because of image quality, unfortunately. I like the dirt at the bottom though -- Thennicke (talk) 01:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I think the quality of the photo of the soldier is good enough. The background doesn't need to be sharp and is probably better this way, for poetic reasons: To demonstrate how disturbed the environment is by these war games. And I find the image compelling. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Need some exposure. --Mile (talk) 08:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too dark, a little oversharpened and the tree in the background is distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 15:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Hockei. --cart-Talk 16:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Turbo petholatus 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2017 at 04:12:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shell of a Tapestry Turban, Turbo petholatus

File:Santorin (GR), Exomytis, Vlychada Beach -- 2017 -- 2999 (bw).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 22:42:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vlychada Beach in Exomitis, Santorin, Greece
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Greece
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 22:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 22:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent! --Basotxerri (talk) 05:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Lovely! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Strange noise pattern in the sky. Since it's not present in the color original, I assume it must be the result of adding contrast in post. I do love the effect the contrast gives, but maybe tweaking it a bit and/or adding NR could help with the situation. -- King of ♠ 06:54, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Fixed Thank you for your advice. I've added some noise reduction in the sky. --XRay talk 07:04, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not as dramatic as before, but still an FP for me in terms of wow factor. Whenever you try to pull contrast out of nothing, increased noise and/or posterization is the inevitable result; usually it's from pushing shadows, but mapping from a very narrow range in the highlights to a much wider range of tones can lead to this as well. Taking into account the improvement in image quality this is a better version than before. -- King of ♠ 01:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

*Symbol oppose vote.svg weak oppose it's a great image - but the sky still ruins it for me. Sorry! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Please tell me why the sky ruins it. --XRay talk 07:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Burg-Rabenstein-Ailsbachtal-P1290149.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 19:47:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rabenstein castle in the Franconian Switzerland near Bayreuth
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Rabenstein castle in the Franconian Switzerland near Bayreuth. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 19:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 19:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - What a dramatic location! And a really good photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is very beautiful but I think you darkened the sky just a tad too much in your latest version, such that it looks unnatural. -- King of ♠ 23:24, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You are right. I tried to fix that. Thanks a lot.--Ermell (talk) 06:45, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
      • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much more natural now. -- King of ♠ 06:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 17:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Capricorn4049 (talk) 18:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 02:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Love it too, but could you do something about those odd pinkish areas on the clouds highlights? Daniel Case (talk) 06:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If you add some 0,1-0,15 exsposure i support. Too dark. --Mile (talk) 08:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Palace of St. Michael and St. George, Corfu - September 2017.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 14:20:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Palace of St. Michael and St. George with statue of Frederick Adam, Corfu

File:Maman de Louise Bourgeois - Bilbao.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 10:25:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The spider sculpture Maman by Louise Bourgeois at the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain
  • Yes, that's one of the points. Besides the composition, the interesting lighting and the for Bilbao very representive wet ground, I like the absence of people which isn't easy to get these days. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There may be some imperfections, but with a creature right out of War of the Worlds and lighting from Blade Runner the wow is huge! I would also have nominated it if I had found it first. --cart-Talk 17:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Big wow! --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral It's a nice capture, but image quality is suffering in the background (not a huge problem though) and the processing is not particularly impressive - dark and low in contrast (reducing the "wow"). Do you have a RAW file for this image? I'd love to have a play with it if you do -- Thennicke (talk) 00:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
I'm going to search but I have to remember and it's the most difficult. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too noisy. Especially dark noise. There are many artefacts. --Hockei (talk) 17:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like it for the same reasons cart does, and so many more, but I would like to be able to see the metadata on this image so we have some idea if it might be improved more in processing. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wow for the sculpture, not for the photo. The bad weather and light pollution has made for a ugly brown overcast sky. The subject is also confused with the background at this angle. File:Bilbao Guggenheim (28746928753).jpg has a better angle and light, though shame it doesn't capture the whole creature. (Please embed a colour profile too). -- Colin (talk) 12:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de Ntra. Sra. de la Junquera, Luesma, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 60.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 09:00:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Our Lady of La Junquera, Luesma, Zaragoza, Spain

File:Bergtocht van Sapün (1600 meter) via Medergen (2000 meter) naar brug over Sapüner bach (1400 meter) 001.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 04:45:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Mountain trip from Sapün (1600 meters) via Medergen (2000 meters) to bridge over Sapüner bach (1400 meters). Panorama from Seebjibodem 2072 (meter). Special atmosphere at 2072 meters altitude.

All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

File:2017.01.21.-09-Paradiski-La Plagne--Vanoise Express-Blick Richtung Les Arcs.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2017 at 19:00:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paradiski, Vanoise Express, view towards Les Arcs.
Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request And why? Just a QI. is no reason, it is like I don't like it. BTW, it isn't a QI because I didn't nominate it as a QIC. --Hockei (talk) 07:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
@HalfGig: I'm still waiting for you valid reason. --Hockei (talk) 15:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Might be a little busy, but captures that feeling of anticipating a great day on the slopes. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too busy for me -- Thennicke (talk) 03:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The funicular (capacity almost 200 people) and the ski resort what I show here is busy, yes. It is in the nature of things. --Hockei (talk) 07:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I should have been more specific. The composition is too busy for me. And unbalanced, with more "stuff" on the right than the left. -- Thennicke (talk) 09:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Gobierno Estatal de Baviera, Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2017 at 17:11:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bayerische Staatskanzlei (Bavarian State Chancellery), Munich, Germany.

Image:Flamenco andino 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2017 at 14:49:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Andean flamenco in Salar de San Pedro de Atacama
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now -- Thennicke (talk) 00:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I wouldn't promote at QI. Charles (talk) 10:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Apart from contrast/tone or whatever, back of bird is over-exposed and leg is moving (blurred). Charles (talk) 11:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Thennicke Daniel Case (talk) 01:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Could have a bit more contrast. But the composition wowed me very much. --Hockei (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose watter should be reflexed --Mile (talk) 08:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Dunnottar Castle dt 2017 36.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2017 at 11:18:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Revista-anteojito-nro6.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2017 at 22:36:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Magazine Anteojito, number 6
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Manuel García Ferré - uploaded/nominated by me --Ezarateesteban 22:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - To be outstanding and worthy of a feature, it would have to be digitally restored. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree that in this case the image quality is not high enough for FP. I whole-heartedly support the idea of comic covers as FPs, though, so long as the copyright issues are handled.--Peulle (talk) 10:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IMHO, wrong lincence. This isn't a photo, but a painting. --C messier (talk) 13:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question What do you mean?--Peulle (talk) 15:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
@Peulle: It has a public domain licence, {{PD-AR-Photo}}, which mentions with bold, Use this template exclusively for photos and NOT for drawings or other pieces of art.. And this is a drawing, not a photo. --C messier (talk) 07:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
@C messier:Yes, I see now, thanks for clearing that up. I suppose the correct one to use should have been {{PD-old}}?--Peulle (talk) 10:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately no, Peulle, the author en:Manuel García Ferré died in 2013. --C messier (talk) 11:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I suspected that, hence my comment above next to my vote - I was just wondering what template should have been used if the copyright had expired.--Peulle (talk) 23:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unsharp like the other one. Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

File:NASA's Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 905 (front) and 911 (rear).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2017 at 11:36:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Dead Horse Gap Panorama facing north-east, NSW.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2017 at 11:29:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Drum of a washing machine (Bosch Maxx WFO 2440).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2017 at 07:50:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Drum of a front-loaded washing machine (Bosch Maxx WFO 2440; 5 kg; 1200 RPM)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Drum of a front-loaded washing machine (Bosch Maxx WFO 2440; 5 kg; 1200 RPM). All by me. -- Mile (talk) 07:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I dont know why they didnt accept it on "Women's world" !? Its still fine shot. -- Mile (talk) 07:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Do only women wash where you live? --cart-Talk 09:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support great idea - --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cool. --A.Savin 10:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment CA removal needed.--Peulle (talk) 11:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Show me Peulle, where is it. cart you forget to vote. --Mile (talk) 11:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Comments can be made without voting. You have nothing to gain by telling people to do so, it's just rude. I don't have the time to examine photos closely right now. --cart-Talk 12:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For such a static subject I think the composition needs to be better. The rib at the bottom isn't centered, and the bottom corners have intrusive elements. Perfect lighting and processing though -- Thennicke (talk) 12:15, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Thennicke if you crop corners you will lose lot of picture. If think this is better than croped. Static - more or less all is static. --Mile (talk) 12:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • That's true, but I still don't like the rib at the bottom. Do you still have access to this washing machine? If you could do it again with everything symmetrical I'd be supporting -- Thennicke (talk) 12:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Doing on that Thennicke, centralizing...but some corners will stay, cant go out, unless drum would be so big, to put camera more in. --Mile (talk) 13:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Interesting idea.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Now is more in center Thennicke. And some CA was there Peulle, i removed. --Mile (talk) 14:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Thennicke (talk) 09:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support What do you do if the weather is horrible but you like to shoot something? You go for the washing machine! --Basotxerri (talk) 15:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Exactly, cart, that's the image I was thinking of. And how desperate someone must be who puts some torch lights in a washing machine for shooting it! Face-smile.svg --Basotxerri (talk) 18:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • You forgot: "Having to stand in the bathtub and placing the tripod in the washbasin, hoping I wouldn't slip and drop the camera in the toilet..." Face-wink.svg I had a very small bathroom back then. (And I was very bored.) --cart-Talk 19:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Centro histórico de Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 41.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2017 at 07:10:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skagway Bazaar, Skagway Historic District, Alaska, United States
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Diego Delso - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Something different. I think it's interesting enough to feature. I'll be interested to see what you think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 10:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 11:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I thought of this as an FPC when I saw it on QIC, however the crop isn't symmetrical what I would prefer for this kind of image. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
    Ok, fair enough, Basotxerri, ✓ fixed Poco2 16:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support and once more my gratitude to Ikan Poco2 16:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • De nada. You did all the work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK, you deserve my vote Face-smile.svg. Thank you! --Basotxerri (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice but WB is too yellow. -- King of ♠ 00:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support HalfGig talk 01:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain because I am currently a judge for WLM-US and this may yet come up as a candidate. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --cart-Talk 08:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes. -- Thennicke (talk) 09:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 10:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • The sky seems a little too dark, but the house is nice.-- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 15:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --fedaro (talk) 19:46, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a bit distorted though. --Laitche (talk) 23:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Revista-billiken-n2079.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 22:20:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Editorial Atl{antida - uploaded/nominated by me Ezarateesteban 22:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Congrats to your fourtieth birthday, Ezarate. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose imo the resolution is not really sufficient for a nom of that kind. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree, this is not good enough even as a historical picture for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • I like the idea of posters and historical images, but Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per the others.--Peulle (talk) 11:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Way too unsharp per others. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Παναγία Πορταρέα 3816.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 21:07:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Funerary monument and stone built church in Portaria, Greece
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 21:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • The small square where the church of Panagia Portarea is located. Apart from the church, it also features the funerary monument of Pantazis Anast. Zoulia. The church dates from the 16th century and is built by stone, including the roof top, a characteristic of the traditional architecture of Pelion, Greece. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- C messier (talk) 21:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Special mood, captured very well. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice color pass, from white to yellow. Compo also well. --Mile (talk) 06:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I thought this was a painting when I saw it at thumbnail size. -- Thennicke (talk) 12:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A little busy but I like the evening mood. Daniel Case (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --fedaro (talk) 19:46, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ---Pudelek (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing of interesting more distort and the light on the right is very disturbing.....this is one of the best pic in commons? --LivioAndronico (talk) 07:56, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Riisa raba varahommikul.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 20:47:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Riia Bog at early morning hour

Neymar Jr official presentation for Paris Saint-Germain[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 14:53:06 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The most expensive footballer Neymar Jr official presentation for Paris Saint-Germain, 4 August 2017.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by by Antoine Dellenbach (Flickr) - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too much noise (why is the ISO so high?) and the left image is of too low resolution for me to support the set.--Peulle (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because I really don't see any of them as exceptional. Two of them are tilted and the other is a pretty standard grip-and-grin image. Daniel Case (talk) 00:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm afraid I have to agree with the other opposers --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Would support just 3rd. --Mile (talk) 06:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Me too. It's a good shot. -- Thennicke (talk) 09:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Nanxiong Sanying Ta 2014.01.12 08-26-52.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 13:17:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sanying Pagoda
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Sanying Pagoda, a pagoda in Guangdong, China, built in 1009, more than 1000 years ago. All by Zhangzhugang -- Zhangzhugang (talk) 13:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Zhangzhugang (talk) 13:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is not a bad idea and the image could work but as it is, it seems too pale and would require better lighting and sharpness to convince me. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basotxerri, especially the comment on sharpness. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basotxerri. Daniel Case (talk) 00:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basotxerri. --Mile (talk) 06:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Common black-hawk (Buteogallus anthracinus gundlachii).JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 09:28:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common black-hawk (Buteogallus anthracinus gundlachii)
  • I think heat haze followed by poor post-processing to sort it did for the lions! Charles (talk) 15:37, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Cirsium vulgare. Uitgebloeide Speerdistel Cirsium vulgare in verval.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2017 at 07:18:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants Cirsium vulgare #Family Asteraceae.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cirsium vulgare. Seed Boxes of Cirsium vulgare in decay. All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 07:18, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 07:18, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 09:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support HalfGig talk 01:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The light is very uniform and the plant just blends into the background - no wow for me -- Thennicke (talk) 00:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The plant is sharp but it's like Thennike says, sorry, the image seems a bit flat. However I could imagine that the background could be improved. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree with the other opposers: There isn't sufficient contrast between the plant and the background for it to stand out sufficiently, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Aspen groves in Öhed.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 18:44:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aspen groves in Öhed

File:Santorin (GR), Fira -- 2017 -- 2598.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 14:23:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Table with chairs in Fira, Santorin, Griechenland
  • I can try it, but I don't think it's moiré. --XRay talk 18:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Fixed You're right. I haven't seen the problem yesterday. Moiré removed. --XRay talk 15:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I have to demur on this: it's certainly a good photo, but I don't think it's special enough to warrant a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The angle, the Greek national colors ... Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Daniel -Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral, tending to oppose. The lamp is disturbing, and Santorini is not the whole Greece (one can see these colors almost only in the Cyclades, on tourist advertising posters and on the greek flag...), this is not very far from a "tourist/postcard snapshot" (as often said here) but I find this very inspiring regarding the composition. I think it needs a crop at left, and the blue and dark parts suffer of (chromatic) noise. My vote is provisional, it needs reflexion...--Jebulon (talk) 08:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I kinda like the colour scheme, but I'm not really wowed - I also have this sneaking feeling about the quality; it just doesn't seem quite crisp enough.--Peulle (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I do actually think this is exceptional, but I do agree with Jebulon that the lamp disturbs the minimalism. I'd be interested to see it (and its post) cropped out -- Thennicke (talk) 09:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • May be. But cropping out the post the table and the chairs are nearly in the middle. IMO that's not the best composition. --XRay talk 11:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Turnau Hochanger Panorama 20171014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 13:14:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Turnau Hochanger Panorama 20171014.jpg
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info 240° panorama from Hochanger mountain (1,682 metres (5,518 ft)) near Turnau, Styria, Austria. ATTENTION: this file is really huge! --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Awesome piece. I was wondering if it was a little overexposed but on second thought I don't think it is. The sharpness is good and the depth is amazing; you can really see everything from birds to bonfires, from ravines to logging tracks. As for the size, well, you know it's a big image when I have to open it on my gaming rig. :) --Peulle (talk) 14:03, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Brilliant technically I'm sure, but it crashed my PC. We need a better way to assess these panoramas. And why so much grass in the foreground? Charles (talk) 15:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:17, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I propose to cut off the lowest part with the unsharp grass --Llez (talk) 17:55, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, though I'd like to see how it looks with some of the grass cropped out. Charles, did you use the zoom viewer? I used the non-flash one and didn't have a problem this time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik (edits) 20:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Impressive size. A pity that it is not 360°. The unsharp bottom ruins FP to me at the moment. --Milseburg (talk) 20:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 21:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Past a certain point, you can't get more resolution (due to diffraction) without having the foreground being unsharp. There's always focus stacking, but technologically we're not yet at the point that we should demand it for all such FPs. -- King of ♠ 00:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support crazy --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 09:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Capricorn4049 (talk) 22:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Pogled od Crn kamen Jablanica.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2017 at 08:11:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The slopes of the mountain Jablanica seen from the peak Crn Kamen (2,258 m), Macedonia

File:Altenstein-Kapelle-Ruine-266191.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 21:43:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Remains of the chapel of Altenstein ruin
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--LivioAndronico (talk) 09:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice atmosphere and colours and although it seems somewhat insignificant, I like how book on the table can be seen entirely. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition but the processing isn't doing it for me: seems too dark -- Thennicke (talk) 03:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Albertus teolog (talk) 13:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

File:MB&F HMX Black Badger Blue.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 15:18:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by MB&F - uploaded by MB&F - nominated by Claus Obana -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very clean photo, but please add to your file description the fact that this is a watch, because it's not clear just by looking at it, and I think supplying just a link isn't optimal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For description. I had to see official page what am i looking at. Can anyone read what time is it !? Otherwise good commercial shot. --Mile (talk) 08:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others about the description. Documentation for an FP should be just as good as the photo. Regarding the photo, it is no doubt a very good photo but I simply fail to be wow-ed by yet another advertisement using black on black to make their product look cool. It looks rather flat and clinical. --cart-Talk 09:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • It's a clear FP photography-wise in my book, but Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per the others re documentation. It really is necessary to get these things done before nominating.--Peulle (talk) 10:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Conditional support per Ikan pending better documentation. Daniel Case (talk) 18:07, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

File:MB&F Arachnophobia Black.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2017 at 15:16:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by MB&F - uploaded by MB&F - nominated by Claus Obana -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus 15:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, but again, please add a prose description to the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose insufficient description Ezarateesteban 20:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As above...seems like copying Jeff Deboer. --Mile (talk) 08:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 10:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per others. Daniel Case (talk) 14:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Auguste Mariette photography.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2017 at 21:01:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Auguste Mariette by Nadar, ca.1861
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Nadar - uploaded by Jebulon - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kasir (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Respectfully, I mildly Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, because as good as this is, I think the restoration process isn't complete and the dark shape just above and to the viewer's left of the man's head is probably just a product of the damage shown in the original scan. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you Kasir for choice. I did my best with this very difficult restoration. I think perfection requested is not of this world...--Jebulon (talk) 16:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Why would it be so difficult to make the dark area about the same as the rest of the background? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Try by yourself, and you will see ! Face-smile.svg--Jebulon (talk) 08:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
This is the best version --Kasir (talk) 19:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
That's an argument for VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Already VI.--Jebulon (talk) 08:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan. I agree it was a spirited restoration, and you started from very far back, but I don't think the result is up there with our other featured restorations. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Weak support I think this is the best it's going to get. Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Yes, thank you. Symbol support vote.svg Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The background looks strange. Yes the source image wasn't great, but I imagine it's a wall behind him, or perhaps a sheet, and the texture seems wrong for such a backdrop - it should be smoother, no? -- Thennicke (talk) 01:56, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Statue of Saints Cyril and Methodius on Radhošť.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 11:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Statue of Saints Cyril and Methodius on Radhošť, Czech Republic
Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 23:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 15:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Objects

File:Spb 06-2017 img47 Church on the Blood.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 08:58:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Savior on Blood
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Bird's eye-view of Church of the Savior on Blood and Griboyedov Canal in Saint Petersburg, Russia - all by A.Savin --A.Savin 08:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 08:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The overall tone is too grey-- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 09:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think this should be rotated into portrait. Perhaps anticlock. --Mile (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for the general composition.--Peulle (talk) 09:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 11:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Capricorn4049 (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great image. Birds' eye views are always awesome to look at, even if (according to a photographer I was chatting with the other day) they're often judged as a fad in more "serious" photo competitions. -- Thennicke (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice, good job. --Selbymay (talk) 18:37, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Quite visually arresting. But I wonder whether it would look better with a bit of noise reduction. What do you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I did my usual portion (for Phantom always more than for DSLR) in Lightroom. Some remaining noise in darker areas is inevitable, but I'm eagerly awaiting a Phantom with more megapixels, less noise, and not much more weight and price... )) --A.Savin 09:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Unsual view and it works. --C messier (talk) 10:12, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Because it looks like some kind of weird steampunk machinery. :) --cart-Talk 18:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♠ 05:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per cart. It has the technical shortcomings of most drone pictures, but it's an arresting view that only the drone could have gotten. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolf im Wald 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Colin (talk) 17:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --fedaro (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik(talk) 15:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings



Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Wed 18 Oct → Mon 23 Oct
Thu 19 Oct → Tue 24 Oct
Fri 20 Oct → Wed 25 Oct
Sat 21 Oct → Thu 26 Oct
Sun 22 Oct → Fri 27 Oct
Mon 23 Oct → Sat 28 Oct

Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Fri 13 Oct → Mon 23 Oct
Sat 14 Oct → Tue 24 Oct
Sun 15 Oct → Wed 25 Oct
Mon 16 Oct → Thu 26 Oct
Tue 17 Oct → Fri 27 Oct
Wed 18 Oct → Sat 28 Oct
Thu 19 Oct → Sun 29 Oct
Fri 20 Oct → Mon 30 Oct
Sat 21 Oct → Tue 31 Oct
Sun 22 Oct → Wed 01 Nov
Mon 23 Oct → Thu 02 Nov