Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten

Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.

Formalien[edit]

Nominierung[edit]

Leitsätze für die Nominierung[edit]

Bitte lies alle Leitsätze (Englisch) vor der Nominierung.

Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:

  • AuflösungFotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,93 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.
Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.
  • Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.
  • Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.
  • Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.
  • Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.
  • Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.
  • Wertunser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
    • nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
    • Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
    • schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.

Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.

  • Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.
  • Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.
  • Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.
  • Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.

Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.

  • Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.
  • Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.
  • Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.
  • Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.
  • Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.
  • Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.
  • Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.
Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.
  • Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.
Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.

Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.

Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen[edit]

Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.

Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.


Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.

Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein: Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}

Abstimmung[edit]

Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status'),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)

Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.

Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.

Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.

Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen[edit]

Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit

  • {{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
  • {{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).

Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:


In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:

  • Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
  • Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
  • Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.

Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.

Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Allgemeine Regeln[edit]

  1. Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
  2. Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  3. Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  4. Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
  5. Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
  6. Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
    oder durch Hinzufügen von {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
  7. Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
  8. Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
    1. Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
    2. Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
  9. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
  10. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
  11. Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.

Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl[edit]

Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:

  1. Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
  2. Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
  3. Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
  4. Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.

Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.

Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Vor allem sei freundlich[edit]

Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.

Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.

Siehe auch[edit]


Inhaltsübersicht[edit]

Contents

Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Seite erneut laden für neue Nominierungen: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:2015.08.19.-01-Mannheim Vogelstang--Hauhechel-Blaeuling-Maennchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 15:18:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Grant E., Hamilton, Their New Jerusalem, 1892 Cornell CUL PJM 1111 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 14:52:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grant E., Hamilton, Their New Jerusalem, 1892: An anti-semitic cartoon from Judge Magazine.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Maps
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Grant E., Hamilton, Their New Jerusalem, 1892: An anti-semitic cartoon from Judge Magazine.- uploaded by EVDiam - nominated by EVDiam -- EVDiam (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- EVDiam (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very good condition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The restoration could be better. The large smudge under the title at top, the fold lines, the discoloration at bottom, and the numerous black spots could be cleaned up. INeverCry 05:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2015 G5.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 11:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Large-leaved Lupine

File:CDU Wahlkampfplakat - kaspl010.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 09:18:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Alle Wege des Marxismus führen nach Moskau"
"All Marxist paths lead to Moscow! Therefore CDU" - This campaign poster, created for the West German federal elections of 1953, certainly ranks among Germany's most iconic political posters of the postwar period. It highlights Konrad Adenauer's stern anticommunist course, here directly aimed at the Social Democrats, then the leading party of the parliamentary opposition.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support- EVDiam (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Is the white scuffing part of the original poster design? INeverCry 05:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting info.svg Info to my knowledge it is --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
        • I guess I can't fault you for a bad choice made by the designers. Funny that Marx himself was anti-Russian... Face-wink.svg INeverCry 07:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 07:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Wolfsberg Thuern 1 Schloss Thuern mit Weinberg 08012016 2623.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 10:31:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle Thuern with vineyard at Thuern, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria

File:Victor Hugo by Étienne Carjat 1876 - full.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 22:48:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Victor Hugo by Étienne Carjat, 1876
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Étienne Carjat - uploaded & nominated by Scewing
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Scewing (talk) 22:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'm not sure about this one. It's a small file for a featured picture nomination, and it's apparent even at thumbnail size that M. Hugo's right side (to the viewer's left) is blurry. If that's in the original photo and this file is faithful to that photo, we should probably approve featuring it, because of the author's importance and his compelling facial expression, but I think I'll leave that judgment up to others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ah, le voilà! --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 09:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No improvements since the previous nomination. I guess this is the Bonhams version, a downsampled copy of the Carjat Gallica's version, which has a higher size. Good restoration though--Jebulon (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info Actually, I spent several hours restoring it since the previous nomination. Per your suggestion, I went through and eliminated literally thousands of white spots. Previous entry was this, current entry is this. Scewing (talk) 22:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 28-30 PAN.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2016 at 03:13:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 28-30 PAN.JPG
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 03:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I Symbol support vote.svg Support this, but I really wish it went a little further to the right, so that the stones didn't have to be cut off, if possible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support One of those things that needs to be done as a panorama. Good work. Daniel Case (talk) 22:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Ares Tower Vienna from SW on 2015-07-10.png[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 22:18:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ares Tower Vienna from SW
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Ares Tower Vienna from SW, created by Rftblr - uploaded by Rftblr - nominated by -- Hubertl 22:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hubertl 22:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Imposing building. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Good portrait of a building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Not sure. The quality is very good but I think the light situation is not as good as I would expect it from a FP. Also, the composition is more or less boring. I'll take another look in the next days. --Code (talk) 06:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • For what it's worth, I find the composition alright, because it's the one big building with its supporting cast, and to my eyes, the smaller buildings relate formally to the big one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose high quality, but it lacks something that would make me go "Wow!". Sorry, but that's what QI is for, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 08:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. No reason for FP. --Karelj (talk) 15:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Enough for me. A little cooler on the WB than I'd have it, but that's understandable given the predominant blue and green tones, especially on the top. Daniel Case (talk) 19:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting cube! --Laitche (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Ethel Franklin Betts, Save the Survivors, 1918 Cornell CUL PJM 2029 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2016 at 14:53:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ethel Franklin Betts, Save the Survivors, 1918
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Save the Survivors - 3,950,000 Starving PeopleWhere the Victims Are: Campaign for $30,000,000, 1918:Poster from the special campaign of the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief (renamed by 1916 the American Committee for Relief in the Near East, which worked energetically throughout the war to raise funds and provide relief.- uploaded by EVDiam - nominated by User:EVDiam -- EVDiam (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- EVDiam (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Important document in excellent condition and very important to share widely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per everyone else. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Given that it's a two-dimensional image without any photographic elements, have we thought about having a .png version so there's no compression loss, and to take up less memory? Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:BD Bacatá en construcción.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 13:36:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

BD Bacatá under construction

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment We need a category mrtony77 --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not sure that worked right, but I added the category. --mrtony77 (talk) 02:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overprocessed (CA visible on building's roofline) and even if it weren't there's just too much going on here for the intended perspective to work. Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Quite honestly, I find nothing special about this photo. It's got a weird angle and a couple of random-seeming crops, and the netting is very distracting in the context of this composition. I'm sorry; I know I may sound mean, and I feel a little like a jerk giving this feedback, but that's the way I feel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel. INeverCry 03:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Lift Seceda Gherdëina.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 10:45:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chairlift and skiing on the mount Secëda in Val Gardena
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment When I was thinking of what someone might object to, the crop on the left side where the chairlift is occurred to me. My feeling is that in order to have an entire post near the left side of his image without having no space between it and the edge of the picture frame, he probably had to cut off part of its mechanism. Is that what you're seeing, or is it something else? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks for answering, Wolfgang. Yes, the cropped mechanism is my main concern.--Jebulon (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Bel bianco --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Super strong support Well-composed, excellent quality, gorgeous atmosphere. A desired Hollyday scenery and a POFY finalist for me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    • You Brazilian ! Face-smile.svg I mean: that's a common scenery in our old Europe...--Jebulon (talk) 17:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 08:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sea of clouds has wow all by itself, great perspective, and per Ikan there was really no way to crop on the left that would have not been at least slightly awkward. Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:MANNapoli 9058 couple painting.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 09:54:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Terentius Neo and his wife
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by an unknown pompeian painter, the rest by me -- Jebulon (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I remain in the antique ages, with this nice, beautiful, and interesting fresco from a house in Pompeii, in the 4th style, depicting a pair of middle-class Pompeian, certainly husband and wife. It was placed on the back wall of the house, so as to be visible to anyone who transited to the atrium. It shows the baker Terentius Neo, as revealed by the engraved inscription inside the house, and not, as has been by mistake felt for a long time, Paquius Proculus, whose name appears in an electoral inscription painted on an outside wall. The two persons are portrayed as wealthy refined, cultured and fashionable: the woman is wearing a red robe, a pearl necklace with pendant in gold and pearls in the ears, has the typical Nero-era hairstyle (her hair divided by a parted in the middle and tied back, except for tight curls that fall on the forehead), and flaunts culture holding a diptych of wax tablets and a stylus, the same attitude of the so-called "Sappho fresco". The baker wears the toga, that indicates the dignity of magistratuus, and clearly highlights the rotulus (the document certifying his social rank) . All of this is a bit "too much". The current interpretation is that, despite everything, the facial features, made by the author with deliberate loyalty, betray the provincial origin of two upstarts, probably of Samnite origin who, once conquered the economic well-being, aspire to hide their humble beginnings and become a full right in polite society. Found in Pompeii, ca.79 CE, now on display in the National Archaeological Museum of Naples, Italy.-- Jebulon (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 10:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Wonderful painting, excellent documentation and photography. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 10:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support-EVDiam (talk) 14:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Owain Knight (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 04:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Magnifique. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seems to be the best version of this that we have. Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Henk Fortuin 27-03-2003.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 08:49:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Henk Fortuin painter
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ronald Wagenaar - uploaded by EdodeRoo - nominated by [[User:{{subst:Michielverbeek}}|]] -- Michielverbeek (talk) 08:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Michielverbeek (talk) 08:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'm sorry, I don't find this portrait really impressive. It looks like there's a lot of chromatic aberration in the walls, for example, which look more kaleidoscopic than black in full size. I'm not sure anything is fully sharp, and did he always wear unkempt clothes and have a visible cut on his face? Are his paintings fairly represented in this picture? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry this does not fit the FP standards, quality wise. Strong chromatic noise in the dark parts, chromatic aberrations, red eye of the subject, harsh flash light, and flash shadows along the subject.--Jebulon (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Ikan Kekek and Jebulon. You don't even have to look at anything but the thumbnail to see that it's nothing more than a snapshot – note that the criteria for Featured Pictures at Commons are different from those at the different language versions of Wikipedia. Might make a decent Valued Image for the scope Henk Fortuin, though. --El Grafo (talk) 12:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because as per above comments. Yann (talk) 12:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Huehueteotl, Teotihuacán.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 07:43:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Nuvola apps important yellow.svg
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Ordinary snapshot, overexposed foreground, the QI label here was wrongly given IMO. Yann (talk) 12:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Jaguar (Panthera onca palustris) male Rio Negro 2.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 06:41:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jaguar (Panthera onca palustris) male yawning, Rio Negro, the Pantanal, Brazil
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Based on my reading of Category:Panthera onca, there are currently only 2 Featured Pictures of jaguars - one of which is a head shot, and the other, a body picture far inferior to this one and also taken at a zoo. The entire animal is quite sharp in this picture, and even at full size, the entire picture is quite easily viewable, without bokeh that blurs anything anywhere close to unrecognizably. At full-page size, the entire composition is clearly in view, with a foreground, middleground and background - a very good composition, too, in my opinion - showing the jaguar in its habitat. I'd love to see more wildlife pictures like this, and I'll be surprised if anyone votes to oppose featuring this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Perfect snapshot. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I know you mean that comment positively, but to me, this picture is way more than just a snapshot. Look at that composition! Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support he's yawning for the camera. Charles (talk) 07:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    Here, kitty, kitty, kitty. :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 09:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for your contribution to the Brazilian fauna. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportEVDiam (talk) 15:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support An animal-in-environment picture that works as an FP. The pose can't be beat ("Oh my, grandma, what large teeth you have!"), the animal's in focus, and while there are some spots in the background where the limitations of such a small image are evident they are so small as to not matter. Daniel Case (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support even if you did slag off my jaguar! :D -- KTC (talk) 01:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Rather small. Is this a crop? --Code (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Šopsko kolo, XVIII Duna.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 20:39:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT Šopsko kolo, XVIII Duna.jpg
Yes, however, look the weather conditions it's 7 pm (Budapest time and 1:30pm Venezuela time) and dancing!, it's not a building and you can't apply the same rule --The Photographer (talk) 00:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
I understand the challenge, but we're talking about a Featured Picture here. I think it should be more outstanding to be featured. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support per last time. --King of ♠ 02:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - This was nominated before? When? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose September 18, 2013. No significant changes. Per Ikan Kekek.--Jebulon (talk) 10:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Owain Knight (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Drzewianin (talk) 19:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Vodnokon4e (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan and Jebulon. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others, sorry. --Code (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan & others. INeverCry 03:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:St-Laurent-de-Belzagot 16 Paysage avec étang 2013.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 20:26:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St-Laurent-de-Belzagot 16 Paysage avec étang 2013.jpg
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by JLPC - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The picture is sharp and the countryside is pleasant, but I question the composition. For example, I don't like the way the road at the extreme right is cut off - it seems random to me. There might be a way to get a fine composition out of this with some other crop, but I'll leave that to you. As it is, I don't feel that it's an outstanding work that I can support featuring. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The "wow" on this is borderline for me, and if it were one of those super detailed panoramas I would be OK with it, but there is visible unsharpness at 100% on a 20 MP image. --King of ♠ 02:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 21:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan; I don't find the composition stimulating enough. It feels like one of those pictures that felt awesome when you took it but, when you look at later, is more like "oh". I guess the horizon line is too close to flat for me. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think it's really a nice picture and has high quality but it's somehow not extraordinary enough to become FP, I'm afraid. --Code (talk) 06:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan & KoH. INeverCry 03:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Homalocantha zamboi.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 20:22:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Homalocantha zamboi

File:2014.03.09.-23-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim-Fruehlings-Scharbockskraut.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 16:34:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Building in Paulista Avenue 09.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 13:37:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Building in Paulista Avenue, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Yes indeed. It reminds me of Mondrian. It's great how the air conditioners provide a rhythm to the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:W Hotel DC.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 12:50:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the Hotel Washington (Washington, D.C.)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Interior of the Hotel Washington (Washington, D.C.). Created by Jeffrey Totaro - originally uploaded by en:User:Hrboe - nominated by Storkk --Storkk (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Storkk (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Busy but inevitable. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - For a hotel lobby, that's not busy, as there are no guests in the picture! :-) But it has some compositional richness, and I like the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crops at the top (chandelier) and bottom left (table and chair) are quite awkward. --King of ♠ 01:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Owain Knight (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As I said before, more hotel lobbies please. Crop is a little awkward, but I can see how that might have been the lesser of two evils. Very well composed and done for a long exposure indoors with people in the background. Love the arcade ... not something you'd expect to see in a hotel lobby. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. No reason for FP. --Karelj (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, sharp, and good angle, but per opposers.--Jebulon (talk) 17:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per KoH. INeverCry 03:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:תל מגידו.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 09:11:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view of Tel Megiddo, archaeological site in Israel.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Aerial view of Tel Megiddo, archaeological site in Israel. Created and uploaded by AVRAMGR. -- Triggerhippie4 (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Triggerhippie4 (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose seems overprocessed to me. --Hubertl 09:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- A unique picture - shows the place in the rare angle, at least in comparison to other pictures we have in Wikimedia projects. Ldorfman (talk) 14:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - A unique view should earn Valued Image status, but I question whether this is really featurable. You're familiar with this place; could you please tell us whether the vegetation we see in the near right and center really looks like that? And the other thing is that a lot of the picture is hazy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I am not convinced by image quality. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Chaotic composition makes it hard to focus on subject; off colors on top of hill and immediately behind. Daniel Case (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Owain Knight (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Owain Knight: Could you please explain why you oppose? Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel. INeverCry 03:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 217-219 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2016 at 02:41:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View during the blue hour of the church and Monastery of St. Francis, Quito, Ecuador. The Roman Catholic temple, finalized in the 16th-century, is the largest architetural ensemble among the historical structures of colonial Latin America. The church is also featured by the mixture of different architecture styles as its construction took 150 years.
Uoaei1: the roof on the left is (for real) not paralel to the roof on the right. Poco2 22:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Ghosts on the stairs should (easily) be cloned out...--Jebulon (talk) 10:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support INeverCry 03:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Self-portrait October 2014-1a.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2016 at 22:21:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Self portrait of a photographer on a reflecting ceiling. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing idea. Well implemented. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --King of ♠ 07:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but I don't see anything worth FP here. Specially low EV. Yann (talk) 09:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Johann --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting idea; definitely in scope. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe a slight pincushion distortion, and I miss the moustache, but a FP of course (for me) because of the alvesgasparian wow.--Jebulon (talk) 10:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Aesthetically meaningless. - Owain Knight (talk) 18:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As Yann. --Karelj (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Yann. --Code (talk) 06:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Yann -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Yann. INeverCry 03:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Japanese Pied Wagtail in Sakai, Osaka, February 2016.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2016 at 15:55:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Japanese Pied Wagtail

File:Japanese pygmy woodpecker in Sakai, Osaka, February 2016.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2016 at 13:43:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Japanese pygmy woodpecker

File:Панорама на Кратово (1).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2016 at 12:20:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of Kratovo, Macedonia.

File:Pferdskopf (Rhön) im Winter 2016.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2016 at 11:42:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pferdskopf in the Rhön Mountains in Winter 2016
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jörg Braukmann - uploaded by Milseburg - nominated by Milseburg -- Milseburg (talk) 11:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 11:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice mood! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 17:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice light, colors, mood. --Laitche (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. Trivial composition, slight vignetting, a bit too much foreground. A good QI though.--Jebulon (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks washed out to me, and the composition should be wider. --King of ♠ 01:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral - I agree with Jebulon, though also with Martin and Laitche. This is a clear photo, and I do agree with Martin and Laitche that it has a nice mood, but I don't find the composition great. I'm feeling neutral; I were really pushed, I might lean toward the "QI but not FP" side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon. Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Owain Knight (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon. --Karelj (talk) 21:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Jebulon. INeverCry 03:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, PKW auf dem Parkplatz -- 2014 -- 0079.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2016 at 05:52:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

BMW 502 V8 in the parking lot of the airfield Borkenberge, Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • @Golden Bosnian Lily: Please give me a reason for your contra. It's not just voting, a review or reason is usual especially for a contra. Thank you. --XRay talk 15:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 17:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reminds me of a picture I took of a BMW's tire and hubcap a few days ago that might (I hope) eventually turn up here. Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

File:ARG-2016-Aerial-Tierra del Fuego (Ushuaia)–Valle Carbajal 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2016 at 04:01:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Valle Carbajal, Tierra del Fuego
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Godot13 -- Godot13 (talk) 04:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Aerial view of the Valle Carbajal, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina-- Godot13 (talk) 04:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - That's truly awesome! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Soaring and exhilarating. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 05:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 07:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support Wowed view, with great composition, nice mood and beautiful colors. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Great scenery and pretty good quality for an aerial image, but the composition feels a bit unbalanced for me. Cropping about 1/3 of the sky and an equivalent amount on the left would make this much more harmonic, imho (see crop suggestion in image notes). --El Grafo (talk) 10:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 17:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice to see something from the southern extremes of the Earth; interesting how the austral (?) compares to the boreal here. I support the crop idea but I would take out a little less and leave the peak in. It isn't as sharp as one would like and maybe the highlights on the snow in the distance could be toned down ... but I think the photographer did as well as he could given the situation. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Radha and Krishna in the boat of love - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 23:04:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Radha and Krishna in the boat of love
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Unknown artist / Google Art Project, uploaded by Dcoetzee, nominated by Yann (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very high resolution of a traditional miniature from the Kishengarh school of paintings from Rajasthan. Radha Krishna are collectively known within Hinduism as the combination of both the feminine as well as the masculine aspects of God. See Radha Krishna for the details. -- Yann (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'd like to vote for this picture, but I find the documentation insufficient. A date or at least approximate date and, so far as is known, place of composition should be mentioned in the description. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As it concerns Radha and Krishna, it cannot be a physical place on earth, but it is meant to be a mystical one, maybe Shangri-La? So I imagine, the picture expresses more a state of the soul. Like a dreamland. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not asking what place is depicted; I'm asking when and where it was painted. That, or at least as near as we can tell, should be included in the documentation. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • OK, updated from GAP. Yann (talk) 10:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank you, and Symbol support vote.svg Support. I still have a question, though: It looks like there is writing in Urdu or another Arabic-based language on the bottom of the painting. Do you have any idea why, given that this is a pointedly Hindu religious subject? Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Not sure (I don't read Urdu), but Urdu was the lingua franca for scholars in India until the 1920s (or even the 1940s?). Regards, Yann (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Wendell Phillips by Brady.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 22:57:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wendell Phillips, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing left
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mathew Brady, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann (talk) 22:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support At least 150 years old... -- Yann (talk) 22:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK tu pars de loin, mais tu peux faire plus...😉--Jebulon (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Jebulon C'est à dire ? Yann (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
      • @Yann: Il y a encore des tachouilles que tu peux nettoyer, non ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
        • Il faut savoir s'arrêter. Je me suis demandé jusqu'où fallait-il retoucher le cadre. Passé ce point le mieux serait de supprimer tout l'extérieur... Yann (talk) 09:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
          • C'est dedans qu'il y a des choses à améliorer, je trouve.--Jebulon (talk) 14:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 09:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Holy Apostles church ancient agora from Acropolis Athens.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 15:39:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Holy Apostles, Athens
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is the church of the Holy Apostles (Ναός Αγίων Αποστόλων Σολάκη), built in year 1000 in the ancient Agora, as seen from the Acropolis. It is situated partly over the Nymphaïon (2nd c.C.E.). The original floor-plan of the church was that of a greek cross, with apses on the four sides, and a narthex on the west-side. Four columns support the dome. The altar and the floor are of marble. The disposition of some tiles on the outer walls show "cubic" decorative patterns of eastern origin. Four building phases are known, from the repairs and reconstructions over the years. Among all the mediaeval monuments known to have existed in the Ancient Agora, it is the only one preserved. It was restored to its original form in 1954-1957. Athens, Greece.-- Jebulon (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Strong support A great photo of a great photographer. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very rich composition. I hope no-one complains that it's "too busy". :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Arion. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 05:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 09:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice detail; shows the church in its immediate context very well. I love the bird on the tower ... Daniel Case (talk) 00:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
    • some times ago, I was on the way to create a special gallery of my QI with incidental birds...--Jebulon (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Slightly low on "wow," and only moderate image quality. --King of ♠ 01:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Reflexos do Planalto.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 14:14:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Jonas Richter - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very interesting architecture and a nice mood. Could you please add an English description? --Code (talk) 19:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg weak support because small and DoF can be better but nice compotions and colours --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very nice photo. I would have loved for the top of that building not to have been cut off, but I wasn't the one taking the photo. By the way, it's easy enough for me to understand that this building is the seat of the Brazilian Federal Executive. It's the second sentence that's not as easy for me to make out without running some words through a translator or dictionary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Information for @Code, Ikan Kekek: English description and category added. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
      • Thanks, but you translated the part whose meaning was evident to me. :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
        • Ikan Kekek the second part it's just a dramatic text about the photo (it was difficult to translate with the same intensity): "Photo clicked at dusk in September day, during the highest point of the dry season, the setting sun provides special colours to the monument." Nothing important, this kind of dramatic description is quite normal in photo contests promote by this Brazilian "group", the lack of orientation create this type of description. This is a "good" one, normally are "Think about some x, reflecting in the power of my photo...". -- RTA 09:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Special architecture. Great colors. Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I'm not sure. Nice composition. The resolution is low for this kind of image, DoF small. IMO it's sharp in the front and not sharp enough in the back. f/6.3 is too small for this kind of image. --XRay talk 05:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose something is missing, have a lack of wow here. The build size is compromised by the composition, as this is just a small portion of the building, giving the impression of away smaller building, the water is a little bit distracting a longer exposure would be better, and the most impressive of this portion of the building is the curves that are not highlighted in this photo, it's too far, and a little bit lost in the trees. -- RTA 09:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral like XRay. Very good composition, but quite small for a static subject. Quality is OK, but the sky is not interesting. Yann (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Moderate support It could be better, but because of the limitations of the camera used and my own partiality to images of modernist buildings reflected in water I will let that go. I also completed the English description and added the golden-hour category it supports (not that it wasn't obvious from the image, anyway). Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I feel something like RTA. The compo does not work for me (the foor structure at left), and the whole is too yellow. Not a FP for me.--Jebulon (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. No reason for FP. --Karelj (talk) 21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Gesù e Maria (Rome) - Intern.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 10:54:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gesù e Maria (Rome) - Intern
  • These are the colours,nothing is "over". Anyway thanks for opinion --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Moderated support Nice colors, but overexposed windows. Anyway, beautiful interior and FP for me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:56, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm inclined to Symbol support vote.svg Support, but with the same caveat Arion gave above. I wonder how a picture with a slightly shorter exposure would look, because it's not just the windows themselves but some surrounding areas that are overexposed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral but, what stuff are the craftsmen smoking? --Hubertl 23:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC) I changed to neutral, because I smoked some good stuff yesterday ;-), now I´m sober. It´s oversaturated IMO. Maybe you can change it, the rest doesn´t bother me so much. --Hubertl 21:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Long the exposure may have been, but the ringing around the lights and statues on the sides doesn't have to be there. Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I agree with opposers. + oversharpening white lines.--Jebulon (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Levoča Old town hall 2015 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 10:00:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Centrum of Slovak town Levoča
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Karelj (talk) 10:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Very nice composition (except that the people in the foreground could be a bit distracting), but the number of pixels is pretty small, considering that we get a lot of photos that are just as clear but 12 Megapixels and greater. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral If the distortion that there is can be corrected I would consider a support. Daniel Case (talk) 05:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - distortion and foreground --Pudelek (talk) 11:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Bad Kleinkirchheim St Oswald Kirchweg 16 Pfarrkirche hl Oswald Tuerbeschlag 17092015 7572.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 08:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Handles and hinges of the iron door at the Roman Catholic parish church Saint Oswald on Kirchweg #16 in Saint Oswald, municipality Bad Kleinkirchheim, Carinthia, Austria

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5587.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2016 at 07:32:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shelf with hymnals in the St. Jacob's Church, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Thanks for your information. I'll fix it within the next days. --XRay talk 21:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ Fixed It's fixed now. --XRay talk 17:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Far much better, thanks. I like this kind of pictures very much ("different"), especially because I imagine you when you decided to shot this...--Jebulon (talk) 10:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose What is the value of this picture? Nothing particularly interesting. - Owain Knight (talk) 18:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. No reason for FP. --Karelj (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A photo designed to annoy the OC(P)D in me and others! -- KTC (talk) 01:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Vineyards in Prades-sur-Vernazobre 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2016 at 21:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Landscape and vineyards in Prades-sur-Vernazobre, France
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nicely composed, beautiful landscape. France is beautiful.--Jebulon (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Jebulon. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 23:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Jebulon. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--LivioAndronico (talk) 11:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 14:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Under cloudy sky, reveals some features that might not have been visible in sunlight. Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 21:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but for me this has no "wow." The composition is rather dull, and while grey skies are good for bringing out delicate textures or vibrant colors that would be lost under harsh sunlight, here I don't think it works. --King of ♠ 01:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This light is very boring, this grass in foreground don't add to the photo, also the sky, the sky is very dull, and occupy more than 35% of the photo...-- RTA 09:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I keep searching for something outstanding in this motif. --Milseburg (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Madrid May 2014-8a.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2016 at 16:02:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ceiling of the main chapel, Basílica de San Francisco el Grande
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Basílica de San Francisco el Grande. Madrid. Ceiling of the main chapel. It was painted in the last decade of the 19th centurt by José Marcelo Contreras. This is one of a series of photos I took of the ceiling of the Basílica. Without a top quality camera it wouldn't have been possible to use such high ISO settings and still obtain this much detail. Failed first nomination is here. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support We've been spoiled by church interiors that are pinpoint clear throughout, and this is clear on the ceiling but not as clear on the walls. However, it's good enough for me. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 19:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as others. --Hubertl 10:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Equus zebra hartmannae - Etosha 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2016 at 08:31:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Equus zebra hartmannae - Etosha

File:Kõnnu Suursoo. 10.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2016 at 04:07:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden hour in Kõnnu Suursoo bog
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Aleksandr Abrosimov - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 04:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 04:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - This is another one that's grown on me. At first, I doubted I'd vote to support this photo, and if you zoom to full size, it looks like the details are blurred by the golden sun. But look at it at full-page size and move your eyes around it, and you may find that it's a great picture. One question, though: Is the sun rising or setting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
It is taken after sunrise (based on image data: July 16th, 5:02 AM). Sun rises around 04:33 at that day there. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Maria Carolina of Austria in the Palace of Caserta.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 21:10:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Maria Carolina of Austria in the Palace of Caserta
  • Livio this is not a question of taste, you didn't use the full spectrum of colours, and have a lack of whites and blacks.-- RTA
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 14:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely colors. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Karelj (talk) 17:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 21:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Why Abstain Livioandronico? --Famberhorst (talk) 07:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Laitche (talk) 12:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

For me, and for the histogram it's dark, and lack of whites and blacks. Ans was to blue to me, so:

Maria Carolina of Austria in the Palace of Caserta edited.jpg

  • -- RTA 09:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment for @Rodrigo.Argenton: OK, but I prefer to overwriting. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Arion, this is not my paper, as you can see [1], the author have his own mind, and always have this posture (and in my opinion he thinks I take things in a personal matters as others), so I will not change his version. -- RTA 10:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
      • Anyway, I Symbol support vote.svg Support too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The white balance might be better (not sure), but this looks overexposed. Yann (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
    • See Livio the difference? This is only a opinion based in believe (and probably in dirt political matter), not in fact, the fact is that it's not overexposed, and you just need a software that generate histogram to know it: see. -- RTA 18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9185.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 20:07:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jesuit church, Vienna
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info ceiling work at the choir, Jesuit Church, Vienna.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by -- Hubertl 20:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hubertl 20:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I'm bugged by the crop that shows just a bit of golden color. I'll Symbol support vote.svg Support, anyway, though, because it is a really good photo and composition. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great light and colors. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Is the high altar skewed in reality? --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hm, I don´t know really, I should go there again and have a look. --Hubertl 15:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I straightened the lines partly, Uoaei1 Thanks for the hint. --Hubertl 20:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Faustulus - Mosaic de Font de Mussa - Museu de Prehistòria de València.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 18:05:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail of Faustulus as seen in the Font de Mussa Mosaic exhibited in the Prehistory Museum of Valencia. Is one of the few existant artworks portraying Faustulus dating from the Ancient age.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
It was released by the Museum, a ORTS ticket is on the way.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not only per Jebulon's concerns, but this doesn't seem like the best possible picture of this mosaic. I haven't seen it so I don't know if this the whole thing, although I suspect it isn't. If it isn't, then these odd crops were avoidable. Add that to the barely-eligible size of the image, and what you have is a well-done tourist snaphot, but no better (A QI maybe). Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Kippelboy (talk) 06:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Catalan support ? 😊--Jebulon (talk) 20:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Shirley Chisholm.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 14:28:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shirley Chisholm

File:Blad van beuk (Fagus sylvatica) 02.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 06:35:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Plants

File:Leuchtturm in Westerheversand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 05:01:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Westerheversand Lighthouse in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany"

Alternative[edit]

Leuchtturm in Westerheversand crop

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I prefer without people and i crop the white part on the right --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I prefer this version, though I also would have been willing to support the original if not faced with this choice. The composition is beautiful and I love the clouds, which remind me of Dutch landscape paintings. I'm somewhat bothered by noise in the background, but perhaps that's from the exhaust from the plane or something, and anyway, I can't see it except at full size, so I'm tolerating it, given the overall beauty of the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm more bothered by the CA than the noise, but it's a good enough picture that for me, the wow and EV override the technical defects. -- Thennicke (talk) 09:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose prefer the original with the people as a scale. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is a little tighter and I like it better. Daniel Case (talk) 16:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Better. --King of ♠ 04:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 09:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Eriophora transmarina in web at night.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2016 at 03:30:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Australian garden orb weaver at night. Perhaps I should have opted for a macro lens, but I don't own one, and I think this shot shows more context by including the web (this is a particularly neat example of their webs too). Combination of flash and LED torch only just gave me enough lighting at f/5.6, so I'm quite happy with the result.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by Thennicke -- Thennicke (talk) 03:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Thennicke (talk) 03:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good work given the circumstances and equipment. Daniel Case (talk) 05:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fantastic! --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Daniel's remarks. Obvious educational value, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I don't think you really needed a macro lens for this shot as the distance to subject seems good enough for this sort of composition. What I would say is that although this is clearly a difficult spider/web to photograph given the web only exists at night, the lighting does look extremely harsh and probably a bit overexposed. I prefer this image's lighting. Diliff (talk) 13:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • @Diliff: Thanks for the comment. I have a RAW file for this one, and you were right that there was some clipping on the spider on that particular export. I've reprocessed the image now. (This specimen is a lot less yellow than the one you linked; they vary widely in colour. But as you say, the lighting is harsh.) -- Thennicke (talk) 05:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose disappointed, I look the thumb, and I thought that it would be a good one, and than I opened, :/, not sharp, no details... For educational purpose, the one pointed by David is better. -- RTA 12:16, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Owain Knight (talk) 18:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Owain Knight: Could you please explain why you oppose? Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Lacerta agilis female 2014 G2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2016 at 17:24:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sand Lizard female

File:Amari Agia Anna Fresco 02.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2016 at 17:01:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Byzantine fresco in the little church of Agia Anna (Αγία Άννα), Amari Valley, Crete
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media#Religion
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Byzantine fresco in the little church of Agia Anna (Αγία Άννα), Amari Valley, Crete. The frescoes are dated 1225 and the oldest dated frescoes in Crete. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Beautiful (though sadly damaged), important fresco, obvious educational value. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice to have something like this digitized so well. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 13:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 19:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Yes, but who is that saint ?--Jebulon (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Andrew of Crete, jugding from his vestment and the fact that in the whole fresco says Α(γιος) ΑΝΔΡΕΑΣ (saint Andrew). PS: Oldest dated, maybe, however not the oldest in Crete. --C messier (talk) 00:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks. Minoan frescos are older !--Jebulon (talk) 15:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeNice details, but the crop is unfortunate IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good digitalisation, yet the fresco is neither well preserved (would you support an equally damaged painting?), nor it is (IMHO and I'm not the only) of high artistic merit, it isn't even the oldest preserved byzantine fresco in Crete (the chapel of Agios Nikolaos in Agios Nikolaos has frescoes with aniconic motifs that date from the iconoclast, 400 years before or more). --C messier (talk) 12:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • For whatever it's worth, I consider at least what we're seeing to be of artistic merit, and yes, I surely would support a good picture of a damaged easel painting if it were a good and historically important work. In some cases, such photos are actually really important, because they're the "before" photos, with the "after" photos having been overcleaned by restorers, so if at a future time, they want to restore some of the varnish and pigment they shouldn't have removed, referring to the "before" picture could be invaluable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Archäologisches Nationalmuseum Athen.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2016 at 22:08:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

National Archaeological Museum in Athens
  • I don't think so. Please look at the ground, the stairs and the shadow areas. Sky and red facade are OK in my opinion. Regards, -- Wolf im Wald 04:53, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
I think that might just be a consequence of the short exposure and the sun being almost behind the camera. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Not properly categorized. ✓ Done--Jebulon (talk) 11:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The challenge was : nobody disturbing. Very nice.--Jebulon (talk) 16:08, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Immaculate and impeccable. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Techically very good (maybe a bit oversaturated), huge, empty and interesting light. --C messier (talk) 12:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice, but nothing extraordinary. No reason for FP.--Karelj (talk) 22:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Places/Architecture

File:Horse-drawn sleighs 2012 G1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2016 at 08:53:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Horse-drawn sleighs


Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Animals/Mammals


Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Sun 07 Feb → Fri 12 Feb
Mon 08 Feb → Sat 13 Feb
Tue 09 Feb → Sun 14 Feb
Wed 10 Feb → Mon 15 Feb
Thu 11 Feb → Tue 16 Feb
Fri 12 Feb → Wed 17 Feb

Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Tue 02 Feb → Fri 12 Feb
Wed 03 Feb → Sat 13 Feb
Thu 04 Feb → Sun 14 Feb
Fri 05 Feb → Mon 15 Feb
Sat 06 Feb → Tue 16 Feb
Sun 07 Feb → Wed 17 Feb
Mon 08 Feb → Thu 18 Feb
Tue 09 Feb → Fri 19 Feb
Wed 10 Feb → Sat 20 Feb
Thu 11 Feb → Sun 21 Feb
Fri 12 Feb → Mon 22 Feb