Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
COM:KEB
Diese Projektseite in anderen Sprachen:
Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten

Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.

Formalien[edit]

Nominierung[edit]

Leitsätze für die Nominierung[edit]

Bitte lies alle Leitsätze (Englisch) vor der Nominierung.

Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:

  • AuflösungFotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,92 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.
Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.
  • Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.
  • Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.
  • Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.
  • Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.
  • Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.
  • Wertunser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
    • nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
    • Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
    • schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.

Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.

  • Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.
  • Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.
  • Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.
  • Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.

Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.

  • Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.
  • Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.
  • Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.
  • Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.
  • Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.
  • Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.
  • Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.
Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.
  • Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.
Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.

Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.

Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen[edit]

Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.

Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.


Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.

Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein: Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}

Abstimmung[edit]

Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status'),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)

Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.

Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.

Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.

Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen[edit]

Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit

  • {{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
  • {{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).

Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:


In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:

  • Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
  • Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
  • Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.

Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.

Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Allgemeine Regeln[edit]

  1. Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
  2. Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  3. Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  4. Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
  5. Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
  6. Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
    oder durch Hinzufügen von {{withdraw}} ~~~~.
  7. Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
  8. Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
    1. Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
    2. Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
  9. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
  10. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
  11. Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.

Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl[edit]

Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:

  1. Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
  2. Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
  3. Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
  4. Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.

Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.

Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Vor allem sei freundlich[edit]

Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.

Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.

Siehe auch[edit]


Inhaltsübersicht[edit]

Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]

Seite erneut laden für neue Nominierungen: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Male northern pintail at Llano Seco.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 19:48:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male northern pintail (Anas acuta) south of Chico, California
Thanks! I uploaded a new version. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very sharp and beautiful. Cmao20 (talk) 22:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Natuurgebied Petgatten De Feanhoop. 19-10-2020. (actm.) 32.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 16:18:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:20181206-FS-APACHE-SITGREAVES-LSC-0241 (33334016438) (cropped).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 07:38:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A lumberjack standing in front of a forest scene
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service/Lance Cheung - uploaded by Kingsif - nominated by Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 07:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kingsif (talk) 07:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose composition with digger behind his head Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles. The composition does not work for me either. --Cayambe (talk) 12:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others, and too much noise --Llez (talk) 15:10, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Its a great American portrait with a great story behind it. It's not really staged, not cleaned to perfection, and this is the kind of photo I would like to have more on this website. --Andrei (talk) 17:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Andrei. Imperfect, but it tells a story. Cmao20 (talk) 22:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Comet NEOWISE (50155614036).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 05:53:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Comet NEOWISE framed in a starry sky behind the cinder cones near the San Francisco Peaks near Flagstaff, Arizona

File:Exterior facade of Residence Bassac at blue hour, town of Champasak, Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 03:09:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Exterior facade of Residence Bassac at blue hour, town of Champasak, Laos
  • ✓ Done Thanks for the hint -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
    • And on the roof (see note). --Llez (talk) 16:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:หอระฆัง พระบรมมหาราชวัง กรุงเทพมหานคร ประเทศไทย.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 03:07:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bell tower (belfry), upper part, at Wat Phra Kaew, Grand Palace, Bangkok, Thailand

File:Филип Велковски.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2020 at 22:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Macedonian painter and visual artist Filip Velkovski (b. 1988)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Хак Фин - uploaded by Хак Фин - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question How is he notable? --A.Savin 02:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
    He's a painter and visual artist with frequent exhibitions here and there in the recent period (normally, mostly before the pandemic). See this news article (in Macedonian).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:50, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If the man is the focus, a tighter crop and some more background blurring of the very busy wall would improve the image greatly Kingsif (talk) 06:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the idea of a painter getting lost in his painting. But would like to see a category and at least a wikidata item connected to it. --Andrei (talk) 16:55, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
    ✓ Done I've created a Wikidata item and connected it to this image.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Somewhat concerned about lack of FOP for 2D works in North Macedonia. The selection of the artist's own work, combined with framing that places more attention on it than on a typical background, means the work is intended to be part of the image rather than just de minimis background. Apart from that, I do think it's a good portrait (if a bit small). — Rhododendrites talk |  17:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Pupa de coccinélido, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2020-06-27, DD 285-298 FS.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2020 at 15:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Coccinellidae Pupa, Hartelholz, Munich, Germany.

File:Neue Burg, Hofburg, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 143-145 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2020 at 14:57:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Neue Burg, Hofburg, Vienna, Austria.

File:Proses Nembok, Salah Satu Tahapan Membatik Tulis.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2020 at 23:18:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:A girl set fire to cook breakfast by using a coal-filled clay pot; July 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2020 at 23:19:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Gumilang Aryo Sahadewo - uploaded by Rachmat04 - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 23:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 23:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please add {{PR}} in the file page for every pictures displaying recognizable people. Nice image but I think too noisy for FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done. Thanks! ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 02:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality so-so, a bit tight left crop, but the moment is there. --Mile (talk) 08:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • I like this a lot. I wonder about the front of her hair, though. It appears to be more than noise -- is it a light spot caused by steam? — Rhododendrites talk |  13:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Split Cathedral Bell Tower From The Vestibule - Split.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2020 at 11:51:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Bargerveen 23-08-2019. (d.j.b). 21.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 16:25:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands Restoring bog.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Bargerveen Meerstalblok. Peat lake with growing peat bog. Successful recovery of bog in Bargerveen, province of Drenthe on the German border. A project in collaboration with Germany.
    All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Useful photo, but no great composition to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe not the most obvious wow-factor but I like the composition, it's the kind of photo that grows on you after a while Cmao20 (talk) 22:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not special enough in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kekek --Fischer.H (talk) 17:18, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 20:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Alternative, another version[edit]

Bargerveen 23-08-2019. (d.j.b). 19.jpg

  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Both these photos have a very interesting midground and background, but their common flaw is the foreground, which at best fails to draw the viewer in and at worst distracts from the image. Such a shame, because the patterns in the water are really nice. -- King of ♥ 08:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The composition in this version works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:PK Kirthar NP asv2020-02 img04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 15:29:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Euphorbia caducifolia in Kirthar National Park

File:Site des Orgues 031.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 13:43:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Le site des Orgues, Ille-sur-Têt, Pyrénées-Orientales, France

File:Mamoru Shigemitsu signs the Instrument of Surrender, officially ending the Second World War.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 09:49:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An restored version of an iconic picture in history.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Army Signal Corps photographer LT. Stephen E. Korpanty - uploaded by Adam Cuerden - nominated by TheFreeWorld 25 November 2020 09:49 (UTC) -- TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question It's one of the most important events in history the past hundred years, but what can you tell us of the image quality? It seems quite unsharp and I'm wondering if it's been upscaled.--Peulle (talk) 15:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
@Peulle: Source is straight from the US Navy, so this is almost certainly the best available.Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question But is it upscaled from the original print size? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: It's possibly at the higher end of dpi, but the question is kind of meaningless because there's no standard dpi.It's at a level that gets all extant detail. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
I assume there are existing prints? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
I mean, this is a scan of one. It's not an inverse of the negative. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
So what's the size of the print that was scanned? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
The Navy doesn't deign to say, alas. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
I see. Oh well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support An immensely historic and important photo, whatever the technical shortcomings. Cmao20 (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20 --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20, ultimately. Still interested in the answer to my question, but it pales in importance to this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kingsif (talk) 06:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Englische Rose -The Squire- Raureif-20201107-RM-091853.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 09:34:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flower of the English rose "The Squire" with hoarfrost in a garden in Upper Franconia.

Physalis peruviana[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 05:45:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

File:Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000 (chainring 50-34, length 172.5mm, 11 speed).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 11:28:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Others
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000. This one made me work. The number of photos stacked is actually not so important, if you have a "twilight zone" on the subject, like here. 8, shots and hours.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mile (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support it looks pretty cool--Andrei (talk) 12:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The white background is too bright and having no frame doesn't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Charlesjsharp I think there are wannabe rules to avoid watermarks and borders. Beside check the image on the article, the border is always added. Who will want to print outside can add it, the main cause is to represent crankset on Wikipedia. And it represents very well. --Mile (talk) 11:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • The subject is sharp, but you could have chosen a different background. Image description is misleading. You show a lot more than the crankset. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  17:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The subject holds no appeal for me, but I can appreciate the effort that went into it, and it's easily the best and most interesting photo of this motif. Cmao20 (talk) 22:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 12:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles ... it's a very busy composition, the attempt at simplicity notwithstanding. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Forgive me if this sounds really dumb, but isn't the crankset the part buried behind the nice smooth chainguard? As far as bicycle mechanisms go, it's a nice image, but it looks like the image here is of a branded chainguard Kingsif (talk) 06:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • No, the black bit. The circle. The guard covering the chain and thus crankset. As I said, that looks like the main focus - the derailleur is in the corner, if you were wanting that to be the focus then it's very badly cropped - since it appears to be covering up the crankset. I was asking if said chainguard is supposed to be considered part of the crankset. Kingsif (talk) 08:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • I added notations, that is bidon halter in the back. Chainguard - yes and no. On professional bicycles no, on city bikes yes. This is a Pro bike from Giant. Nothing is covering 1st chainring, while front derraileur is set on 2nd chainset (small one). Back of them is plastic bidon holder, mounted on frame. If there some else put notation. --Mile (talk) 15:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Museo di Santa Giulia Coro delle Monache Deposizione Paolo da Caylina Brescia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 11:02:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fresco of Deposition by Paolo Caylina the Younger in the Museo di Santa Giulia in Brescia.

File:Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 017.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 05:26:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail
I don't really see the horizon here and therefore no tilt. With the small heights and distances of ordinary landscape photographs, a curved horizon cannot be attributed to the curvature of the earth. Otherwise the earth would be much smaller. --Milseburg (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
@Milseburg: Actually, on second thought I think it's not mainly height that matters, but focal length. A perfectly rectilinear lens is designed to preserve straight lines, no matter what angle they are viewed from. So a hypothetical horizon that went on in both directions forever should appear as a straight line when photographed from any direction. Suppose our viewpoint is just 1 m off the ground. Then the horizon would appear to be 3.57 km away in all directions (source). If our lens has a 90-degree field of view, then we would expect a straight line 3.57 km away at its nearest point to be km away at the two sides of our frame. But the actual horizon is still only 3.57 km away at the two sides, so it will appear curved. Now, height still does matter to some extent. While the ratio between the actual horizon and the ideal horizon may always be , the vertical angle of approach determines how much the difference is magnified in angular terms. If the camera is at A, the ground below the camera is B, the actual horizon at the center of the frame is C, the actual horizon at the (wlog) left edge of the frame is D, and the ideal horizon at the left edge of the frame is E (i.e. the place where the tangent line at C intersects the plane that defines the left edge of the frame), then increasing will increase , assuming that the ratio is fixed. And increasing height will increase the vertical angle of approach, because the distance to the horizon increases slower than distance to the ground (namely, at the rate of the square root of height). -- King of ♥ 22:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I can really follow the discussion in English. I know how to calculate visibility. I just meant that you can't push a horizon bent in the ordinary photo onto the curvature of the earth's surface. Anyway, as I said, I can't see this problem here. --Milseburg (talk) 12:54, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Colours and light are very good, I really feel like walking on that path. --Aristeas (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Aristeas, I really like the composition. The light doesn't seem outstanding at first but I think the soft, subtle pastel colours are actually very nice. Cmao20 (talk) 22:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 12:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Milseburg --Fischer.H (talk) 17:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a nice image but besides being sharp and with nice lighting, it doesn't shout to me as anything special that anyone on this trail couldn't have taken quickly. The colors and focus seem like a simple auto setting to me (not that this can't be good, but in this case, there are lots of green spots all over the world and if anyone could whip out a point-and-shoot and achieve something like this there's nothing special, if that makes sense), and the whites over in the top right mute the image. I wasn't going to leave an oppose until I looked at the composition of the trail: it's not center, and it's not hitting the right third, it's just sort of off-center. As a really personal preference, I would have preferred a lower camera angle and a little more of the mound on the left. I can appreciate the positioning of the shadows over the trail, though. Kingsif (talk) 06:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
    I did spend quite a bit of time experimenting with this composition; you'll notice that in my series there are no fewer than 6 shots of this scene, each with slightly different framing and lighting, and I thought that this one was the best. The original crop included more of the mound at the left, but for me the extra bit at the far left was superfluous so I cropped it out. Anyways, thanks for the feedback. -- King of ♥ 08:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Corner tower of the Cone and Kimball Building in Red Bluff.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 03:04:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Corner tower of the Cone and Kimball Building in Red Bluff, California

File:Kandanaar kelan theyyam at Peeleri vayanattukulavan kaavu 10.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 19:32:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Theyyam (Teyyam, Theyam, Theyyattam) is a popular ritual form of worship in Kerala and Karnataka, India. Theyyam consisted of several thousand-year-old traditions, rituals and customs. There is no stage or curtain or other such arrangements for the performance. The devotees would be standing or some of them would be sitting on a sacred tree in front of the shrine. In short, it is an open theatre.

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but the scene is a bit too chaotic for me to know what I'm looking at. I also think the file info page could be a bit better.--Peulle (talk) 08:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Arms and part of the fire cut at the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Maybe if it included the entire fire. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dramatic photo but not an oustanding composition for me, per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 22:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The right crop is the main factor Kingsif (talk) 06:14, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:2017, cuba, jardines aggressor, playa bonita, spineyhead blennie (23700572188).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 15:24:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spinyhead blenny
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Chaenopsidae

File:School of sardines at the Monterey Bay Aquarium (12056).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 14:47:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monterey Bay Aquarium Open Ocean Exhibit
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info the Monterey Bay Aquarium Open Ocean exhibit. all by — Rhododendrites talk |  14:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This exhibit is IMO quite special. It's a big, open, completely dark room with a great big viewing window looking out to somewhat less dark water. It was an exercise in capturing crisp silhouettes with decent contrast and not-completely-blurred fast-moving fish in a dark place. There are obvious technical shortcomings but I think the wow factor makes up for them. Curious what others will think. — Rhododendrites talk |  14:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a great idea well executed! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 20:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:54, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Big wow and wonderful composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others: tricky shot well done! --El Grafo (talk) 09:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really great! --Cart (talk) 10:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Creative use. --Mile (talk) 11:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay 💬 09:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Martin. --Aristeas (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Everything has been said - a creative idea well-executed. Cmao20 (talk) 22:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 12:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support A very cool picture, in so many ways. Really, we should make it lead image in Public aquarium, because it just ... it explains the concept more eloquently than any words could. Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kingsif (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#United_States

File:Lac du Salagou - October 2020.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 14:25:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Salagou Lake
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Hérault

File:Puente Arslanagić, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 24.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 13:48:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arslanagić bridge, Trebinje, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Bosnia_and_Herzegovina
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I will understand if you oppose because of the power lines, but for me they are not very noticeable and don't spoil a very well-composed and serene photo, with some lovely rich colours and sharp, clear reflections. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice catch, thank you! a while ago though I took the picture, so I exported again with the latest Lr version Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support That's quite beautiful with its long sight lines. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, it's a fine image, but the scene lacks wow factor for me; it just looks like an ordinary set of houses.--Peulle (talk) 08:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Saint Fulcran cathedral of Lodeve 11.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 10:34:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pipe organs in the Saint Fulcran cathedral of Lodève, Hérault, France
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition and pretty organ. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Why do you cut off the main part of the organ? --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
    • In this photo I would like make a focus to this part of pipe organs. Here you have other version. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:54, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment per Uoaei. Quality is superb but I don’t get the composition. --Kreuzschnabel 20:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is very difficult to show only a part of the organ's prospect without the cut off pipes being disturbing.--Ermell (talk) 23:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Regretful oppose per Kreuz, Ermell and Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

File:National Opera of Lorraine in Nancy (2).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 10:29:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

National Opera of Lorraine in Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, France
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol abstain vote.svg Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is a beautiful picture in several ways, but the right crop is bugging me because the dark gray object is calling attention to itself and impeding my eye movement. I'm wondering what's to the right of that and whether you could crop a bit further to the right. Alternatively, it might work to crop just to the left of it, though I'd have to see the result. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Very beautiful architecture but I find the light a little bit dull. Cmao20 (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I have to confess that I like really :–). --Aristeas (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Wroclaw - Muzeum Narodowe.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 09:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Вид на Эльбрус по пути в Джилы-Су.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2020 at 17:41:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Elbrus National Park
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Russia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A beautiful and stark landscape from the Caucasus, with the road used as an effective leading line. created by Ted.ns - uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too much road. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  16:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not bad and probably QI, but still I don't think it does the beauty of this region enough justice. --A.Savin 20:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A very beautiful scene, but I would go for a more aggressive crop. For a road leading into the distance, the easiest way to make it work is to center the entire road, but if the near portion of the road is going to be off-center, then all of the road should be clearly off-center, i.e. some of the right side should be cropped out. Also, because the sky is relatively featureless I would make it take up about 1/4 of the vertical space as opposed to the usual rule of thirds. -- King of ♥ 04:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Agree with the featureless sky. Too much currently in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Moderate support As a contributor here who has made a different roadscape work as an FP, I'm favorably disposed to this one. This is autumn, and the landscape is bleak because as the distant mountains are already telling us, winter is coming. Therefore the relatively empty sky complements that bleakness. I do agree with King, however, that not as much of it is needed. Daniel Case (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 12:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the long sight line down the road, and this photo also appeals to my sense of vicariously being there. Sure, the sky could be cropped, but I support, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support The more I look at it, the more the candidature seems valid as FP for me. Just weak s per my comment above -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfavorable light-situation on the mountains. --Milseburg (talk) 20:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel, Paris 3 August 2020.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2020 at 07:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Pierre Blaché (Flickr) - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 07:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 07:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Could be cropped a little closer on the bottom, but peaceful, spacious and atmospheric. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Still considering it, but my initial reaction is that the Ferris wheel in the background is sufficiently outside of the frame that it comes off as distractingly unbalanced IMO. — Rhododendrites talk |  15:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
+1. I think the image could get closer to being squared up and lose most of what's on the right. Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I actually quite enjoy the space on the right and the peaceful quality it adds to the composition Kingsif (talk) 06:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 07:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Eureka Inn, Entrance Hall.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 14:00:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Unfortunately, there's nothing I can do to make this wider with the material I've got. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is a little bit tight, but when you're trying to capture a place like this in one frame, you're going to have to make compromises somewhere. Overall I think the architecture is really lovely and there's a lot to look at here. The image quality is great. Any clue as to the reason for the slightly strange assortment of presidential portraits on the wall (Ford on the left, Reagan on the right, and, if I'm not much mistaken, Herbert Hoover in the middle?) Cmao20 (talk) 11:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose crop at bottom Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support When I saw the image the first thing that came to my mind have been "wow". Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 13:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ultimately, the composition works for me, even though I would have preferred a crop slightly further right, and it's a unique, beautiful room with a lot to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose Per Charles, although I understand that there was probably no better way to take the shot Poco a poco (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for the same reason Diego opposes. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The crop could have been better, but the edges are barely important with this composition. It's an astounding image, and for a room so packed the colors are all great and it doesn't look busy Kingsif (talk) 06:20, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Hong Kong Light Rail Light Trails.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 10:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Light Rail in Hong Kong.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro_stations
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Prosperity Horizons - nominated by IN (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--IN (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Without categories. Except for the light lines little image content.--Ermell (talk) 19:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's a composition of light trails, but to my mind, it's a good composition of light trails and works, even if I might prefer a slightly more generous crop on the right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Works for me as well --Kritzolina (talk) 21:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan, yes it's quite simple, but it's striking and works well for me. Cmao20 (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 12:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose does little for me Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The effect is common, so I'd expect more colors or a more interesting background/compo --Poco a poco (talk) 12:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Little content, no wow on my side either, I agree with others -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Nazareno de San Pablo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 00:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nazareno de San Pablo
It's a sculpture of The Nazarene in the Church of La Chiquinquira, made of wood and using a wig made of human hair. In the seventeenth century, Caracas was struck by the plague of black vomit and at that time, and in the midst of such mortality as a result of the plague, the Nazarene stumbled on the path of the procession, with a lemon tree, entangling in its branches and a large quantity of lemons falling to the ground. "Miracle, Miracle!" Shouted the inhabitants of Caracas, taking said lemons and starting from there a tradition, referring to the healing properties of lemon --Wilfredor (talk) 16:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks. It's a great story and a striking photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
I would just like to clarify that this is an additional religious image is not this, this is another statue of the same saint and same type of devotion. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)--Wilfredor (talk) 22:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
What is an additional image? I'm confused. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
This is not the original image of the Nazarene, it is an image of the Nazarene but in another position, it is not a replica --Wilfredor (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
I see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Well captured and good quality. Cmao20 (talk) 08:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 12:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The hair like real mixed with the sculpted beard doesn't make for an aesthetic combination. Poor design in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above, the statue is not the best artwork --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree; it looks almost like a plastic or wax likeness of someone with hair added. However, it's interesting and a well-composed and shot photo, and that's enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great depth and colors Kingsif (talk) 06:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Mon 23 Nov → Sat 28 Nov
Tue 24 Nov → Sun 29 Nov
Wed 25 Nov → Mon 30 Nov
Thu 26 Nov → Tue 01 Dec
Fri 27 Nov → Wed 02 Dec
Sat 28 Nov → Thu 03 Dec

Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung)[edit]

Wed 18 Nov → Sat 28 Nov
Thu 19 Nov → Sun 29 Nov
Fri 20 Nov → Mon 30 Nov
Sat 21 Nov → Tue 01 Dec
Sun 22 Nov → Wed 02 Dec
Mon 23 Nov → Thu 03 Dec
Tue 24 Nov → Fri 04 Dec
Wed 25 Nov → Sat 05 Dec
Thu 26 Nov → Sun 06 Dec
Fri 27 Nov → Mon 07 Dec
Sat 28 Nov → Tue 08 Dec