Commons:Kandidater til utmerkede bilder

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | հայերեն | +/−

Dette er kandidater til å bli utmerkede bilder. For et arkiv over tidligere nominerte bilder, se loggen. Det finnes også en kronologisk liste over utmerkede bilder.

Nominering[edit]

Om du tror at du har funnet eller laga et veldig bra bilde, legg det til i seksjonen for nominasjoner, øverst i lista, ved hjelp av denne lenka (hjelp). Du trenger ikke å ha en konto – selv anonyme brukere kan nominere bilder.

Bildet som nomineres må ha en god beskrivelse og en god lisens.

Avstemningsregler[edit]

  • Avstemninga pågår i 9 dager; resultatet blir fastsatt den 10. dagen.
  • Dersom et bilde ikke har fått noen positive stemmer fra andre enn den som nominerte innen 5 dager, kan bildet fjernes fra lista.
  • Nominasjoner fra anonyme brukere er tillat.
  • Bidrag til diskusjoner fra anonyme brukere er tillat.
  • Stemmer fra anonyme brukere gjelder ikke.
  • En nominasjon gjelder ikke som en stemme – den som nominerer har også stemmerett.
  • Den som nominerer et bilde kan når som helst fjerne nominasjonen.

En kandidat blir et utmerka bilde dersom følgende krav møtes:

  • Korrekt lisens (selvsagt)
  • Minst fem stemmer for
  • Et stemmeforhold på 2:1 (dobbelt så mange ja-stemmer som nei)
  • To ulike versjoner av samme bilde kan ikke bli utmerka; kun det med høyest antall stemmer blir valgt.

Stemming kan gjøres med malene {{support}} eller {{oppose}}, nøytralitet angis med {{neutral}}.

Kandidater[edit]

Contents

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:19-11-09-Alte-Nationalgalerie DSF4154.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 22:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alte Nationalgalerie Berlin, Kuppel im ersten Obergeschoss

File:Nevelzwam (nebularis) tussen afgevallen beukenblad (d.j.b.) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 17:39:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Stata Center (05689p)2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 17:13:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stata Center at MIT
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Stata Center at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, designed by Frank Gehry. created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites talk |  17:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  17:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice photo, but the right crop close to the bottom is cut, so for me no FP --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Michiel makes a good point, but without even considering that, as I said in the nomination of your other photo of this building, this composition doesn't work for me, either, because the building has unbalanced movement, especially to the right. An accurate portrayal of a building that is its own unbalanced composition could be a useful VI, but that doesn't make it an FP to me, unless there's something complementing it in order to produce a composition that satisfies me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:2017.07.22.-01-Leutershausen an der Bergstraße--Oberrheinische Tiefebene.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 17:17:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oberrheinische Tiefebene
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 17:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hockei (talk) 17:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This looks like a quite common landscape image, I don't see this special enough to be a FP, sorry. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basotxerri, and there’s poor detail which is not excusable at that small image size. JPEG artifacts visible on the roofs/gables. Left half of background is tilted CCW (see chimneys). Sorry, this is a nice view but by no means an outstanding image of it. --Kreuzschnabel 20:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Es war mir schon klar, dass du kommst und wieder einmal Gründe erfindest oder aufbauschst um ein oder das Foto abzulehnen. "tilted" ist es kaum und das bisschen kommt daher, weil bergab fotografiert ist. Es ist ganz natürlich. Das müsstest du eigentlich wissen oder willst es vielleicht gar nicht. Ich kann mich an Fotos erinnern, die viel mehr "tilted" waren und hier trotzdem akzeptiert wurden. Es gibt auch keine "JPEG artifacts". Was auch immer du da siehst, hat nichts mit "JPEG artifacts" zu tun. Eher wohl mit atmosphärischen Verhältnissen. Denn es war keine klare Sicht, sondern eher dieslich. Sonne und Regen im Wechsel. Daher aus deiner Sicht wohl auch "poor detail". Und, was heißt eigentlich "small image size"? Also, die Frage stelle ich mir selbst. Offenbar willst du irgendwie Kameras mit 20MP-Sensoren hier nicht akzeptieren, raushaben, schätze ich. Es müssen wohl mindestens 40 MP sein. Denn ich habe das Foto ja lediglich von 4:3 auf 16:9 geändert. Es ist also die volle Auflösung. Unglaublich. --Hockei (talk) 21:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Rawlinna (AU), Indian Pacific Express -- 2019 -- 0597.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 06:55:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Indian Pacific Express in Rawlinna, Western Australia, Australia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 06:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 06:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose We have a lot of train FPs, and this one I feel is missing something to be considered one of the best on Commons. Just looks like a good QI to me.--Peulle (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree. QI and VI if nominated, but not a great composition like, for example, some of Kabelleger's pictures of trains in gorgeous panoramas. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice shot and a quality QI, but per Ikan and Peulle I've seen better-composed train photos. Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination I see ... and agree. --XRay talk 13:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Woodend Beach, Canterbury, New Zealand (6).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 05:18:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Woodend Beach, Canterbury, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/New Zealand
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's Woodend Beach lifgtened with the last bits of sun. -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Surely nice lighting but I can’t see anything outstanding here to feature. Random crop, little wow. --Kreuzschnabel 06:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I would also expect a little bit nicer weather. Otherwise nice. -- -donald- (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kreuzschnabel.--Peulle (talk) 07:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's simply a beautiful view. --Hockei (talk) 10:34, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Works well to me. Not all FPs have to be under a bright blue sky. Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

talk">talk]]) 07:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel -- Karelj (talk) 20:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:New Zealand bush during the rain, Mt Oxford area, Canterbury, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 05:18:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

New Zealand bush during the rain, Mt Oxford area, Canterbury, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/New Zealand
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's a New Zealand bush in the rain. -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is way more interesting than your other nomination but the rain idea is somewhat not in the pic itself, just in the description. I’d like to see some raindrops falling or something like that. --Kreuzschnabel 06:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very nice. But I am missing something like the ground at the bottom. -- -donald- (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but I don't see the big wow factor. Perhaps someone who doesn't see woods like this one every day will be more excited.--Peulle (talk) 07:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As one who is constantly trying to capture the perfect rain photo, I know how insanely difficult it is to shoot falling rain (it always ends up looking like fog/overcast/mist to viewers). You can't get the drops visible enough if you don't have a counter light, so instead you have to go for the special light and colors that a pouring rain creates. I think this would be much better if you just went with concentrating on the light in part of the forest instead of the whole wet place. I would recommend a square(ish) crop to do this, see note. --Cart (talk) 10:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great atmosphere. --Hockei (talk) 10:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Hockei. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mist -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Fruit on a plate 2019 G1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 22:59:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fruit on a plate. Pear, figs, persimmons, bitter melon (momordica), plums and tangerines. Marmaris, Turkey
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, the compo doesn't appeal to me. Fruit photos often work better of the fruits are bunched together in tasty-looking delicious heaps with perhaps some items trailing off from the main bunch, this is too scattered. The top down light doesn't help either, a light slightly from the side would give better volume to the subject. --Cart (talk) 09:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Nice shot overall but I do see where Cart is coming from. Cmao20 (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Harsh light, and the composition with pistachios well scattered around the plate lack natural -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's the harsh flash light. --C messier (talk) 16:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but the light is not good. --Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Castillo de Hohenwerfen, Werfen, Austria, 2019-05-17, DD 143-149 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 20:31:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Courtyard and surroundings of castle Hohenwerfen, Werfen, near Salzburg, Austria.

File:Boulders Beach 2019 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 17:24:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African penguins (Spheniscus demersus), Boulders Beach, Simon's Town, South Africa.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It's a raw file from the camera. Small adjustments done to this version. —kallerna (talk) 18:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Fascinating place but I find the framing a little bit random in terms of how it cuts off some of the penguins at the edges. It's a difficult one to know how to get right, but I think a wider framing might have been a bit better Cmao20 (talk) 13:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20: The wider shot you may be looking for is this FP by Poco, and there's also this nice narrow but long shot, although that one wouldn't make it if nominated today. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Naissance du Wetr.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 14:50:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dancers during a Wetr creation tale dance in Lifou, New Caledonia, Melanesia.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Dancers during a Wetr creation tale dance in a cave in Lifou, New Caledonia, Melanesia.
    Created and uploaded by Oroffino Michel - nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great composition, light and colors. -- Cart (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Was thinking about nominating it too, very great picture. Thank you for translation from French --Andrei (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Yes, some really great photos came out of that competition. It might be worth looking at all the uploads from it, not just the winners, since wise from WLM we know local juries make their decisions based on other criteria than we at FPC do. --Cart (talk) 16:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I wish there weren't such a tight crop at the bottom, but a fascinating photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -Bijay chaurasia (talk) 19:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 07:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I wish the little guy wasn't holding his hand in front of his face but otherwise excellent.--Peulle (talk) 07:38, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very interesting photo. Cmao20 (talk) 07:54, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --C messier (talk) 16:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:La pirogue à balancier.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 13:08:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The canoe is an integral part of Polynesian life. It is used as means of transport between villages or houses and in sports activities on the water.
  • Looks perfectly ok to me. In many spots the color of the light reflected on the waves is the same as the color of the reflected clouds so the patches become almost uniform in color and some may see that as 'blurry' in a photo. Light on waves can make very strange patterns sometimes. --Cart (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not an excellent picture for me.--Fischer.H (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Too much not very interesting sky and water and not enough canoe. Also, the message about canoes being integral to Polynesian life is undercut by the "RAINA TOURS [phone number]" text on the front canoe, and a closeup would make the photo even more of an advertisement. I recognize that some people consider this kind of image highly artistic, but it's not that interesting to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan Poco a poco (talk) 20:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really great. Yes, a bit unusual for what we're used to see here but that's makes it special. I can imagine the photo to be in an exhibition hall as an example of minimalist photography. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Terrible quality, but I do see myself hanging this at home. Beautiful minimalism. - Benh (talk) 21:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 07:40, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Benh and Podzemnik. Cmao20 (talk) 07:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others. -- Colin (talk) 13:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Wonderful composition. IMO there are JPEG artifacts. So please upload an uncompressed image. --XRay talk 13:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:04, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Not sharp at full size, but per Podzemnik and Benh. One of mine, similar to this, failed last August, but I like this kind. Space evokes me freedom and tranquility -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I voted for that photo. It has a much better composition than this one, in my opinion: Because of all the individual trees and reflections thereof, it is not static like this one, even though it's certainly a peaceful image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose heavy compression and composition is weak. --Ivar (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - beauty in its simplicity. I echo Cart's "Ahhhhh..." Atsme Talk 📧 17:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg NeutralGA candidate.svg Weak support Great minimalism, gives me a sigh of relief, but quality is not as good, and (as Ikan noted) the advertising on the canoe is irritating. --Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes, it’s nice, but image quality is below FP threshold IMHO. Puzzling rendering of water surface as mentioned by me above, and the only thing within the frame is unsharp (motion blur). --Kreuzschnabel 20:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Peilstein 20191012 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 05:40:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peilstein
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Lower Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Sunset at autumnal Peilstein mountain in the Vienna Woods, Lower Austria. Can you find all the climbers? All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very high quality, but I need something more in the foreground. --Claus 06:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Technically great, still the wow on the subject itself is limited on my side. Saturation/contrast looks a bit overdone, the forest is too dark to me. --Kreuzschnabel 07:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good work. Very well composed and detailed portrait of this interesting mountain. The high resolution makes viewing not easy and does not have to be IMO. But the climbers are an eye-catcher in full resolution, which is pleasantly sharp. --Milseburg (talk) 15:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very bland composition - Benh (talk) 21:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Huge file, and undoubtedly a VI if nominated, but I find the composition pretty inert. Nothing much helps my eyes move around the picture frame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Boston Public Garden (36008p).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2019 at 23:06:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boston Public Garden
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#United_States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info panorama from eight images, created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites talk |  23:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A lovely morning in the Public Garden in Boston, Massachusetts (but it was actually -7°C at the time) — Rhododendrites talk |  23:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like how the trees on both sides rhyme. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is something like a flying branch in the sky top left of the left tree – I would remove that, IMHO it’s irritating. ;–) --Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 07:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - nice framing, Rhododendrites. Atsme Talk 📧 17:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Stata Center (05773p).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2019 at 22:39:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rear of the Stata Center at MIT
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info stitched from four frames, created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites talk |  22:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is the rear of the Stata Center building at MIT, designed by Frank Gehry. I took several shots of this building while there last week and selected this one because it's a less common perspective and captures a mix of styles the building incorporates. — Rhododendrites talk |  22:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good architect, good image! --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think this is not the best angle of view of this building.--Claus 06:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great architecture on the building but the shady foreground does not make it look favourable. You’ll certainly find a better lighting for this. Architecture photographs should be crisp sharp and noise-free, so a tripod is highly recommendable :) --Kreuzschnabel 07:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Kreuzschnabel, W.carter: Thanks. So I actually have two uploads built from the same 10 frames, that one and File:Stata Center (05689p)2.jpg. I decided to use two different stitching modes, work on both images, and see which one I liked better. I didn't intend to upload both, actually, because to my eyes the proportions of the second one are closer to what I remember it looking like (the top of the first one appears a bit squished, and the end result is quite a bit smaller, too). But that makes me curious why the first one stood out? — Rhododendrites talk |  16:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting place but that unsightly metal crate thing in the foreground is quite annoying, and I also think too much of the image is in shadow. I would definitely vote for the image Kreuzschnabel links to, though. Cmao20 (talk) 07:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - For this composition to work for me, I think you would have needed a strong somewhat diagonal cloud, going across and somewhat down from right to left. The other photo doesn't really work for me, either. I think it's quite challenging to get a really satisfying photo of this building, because of its own very unbalanced composition that needs a complement somewhere in the picture. I know many people won't agree with me about that because they think that Gehry is a great genius, and therefore, every Gehry building is ipso facto great and a fully resolved composition by itself, and it's OK that there are different views about this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I kinda agree with you, great architecture doesn't automatically make for great photos, mostly because the buildings are so demanding themselves. It's often easier to make great photos of simple buildings since you can add to the scene through the use of a camera. --Cart (talk) 09:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination thanks for the feedback — Rhododendrites talk |  14:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Spb Anichkov Palace asv2019-09 img15.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2019 at 17:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wooden ceiling of the library in Anichkov Palace
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Russia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Wooden ceiling of the library room in Baroque Anichkov Palace, Saint Petersburg ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 17:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 17:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Oversharpened (artifacts visible on the candelabra). Not enough to oppose though because of the great rendering of the ceiling. --Kreuzschnabel 07:12, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not convinced about the bottom crop and the chosen perspective Poco a poco (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per poco. Lots of unfortunate crops. - Benh (talk) 21:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks like a beautiful place, and I don't think it's oversharpened, but I agree with Poco and Benh about the crops. Cmao20 (talk) 07:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition. Normal picture, not so special -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Tagblume Commelina communis stack25 2019-08-05-RM-8050218-PSD.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2019 at 09:32:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flower of a dayflower (Commelina communis). Stacked with Helicon Focus from 25 frames
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order_:_Commelinales
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Flower of a dayflower (Commelina communis). Stacked with Helicon Focus from 25 frames. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 09:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 10:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - This looks to me to have broken new ground in flower photos on Commons. Strong support! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. --Dinkum (talk) 12:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Though I think you should consider whether the "stack25 2019-08-05-RM-8050218-PSD" details in the filename are relevant to anyone but yourself. The date perhaps. I have set my LR Mediawiki uploader to use the "Copy Name" Lightroom field for the wiki filename, giving me control over the name uploaded for Commons vs filename on disc. It also has the advantage that virtual copies can all be uploaded with different names if required. -- Colin (talk) 14:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the hint. Very good idea.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -Bijay chaurasia (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 19:43, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support although I don't see any info about shooting place. --Ivar (talk) 20:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info added.--Ermell (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Axel (talk) 23:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Claus 06:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Respect. -- -donald- (talk) 07:39, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Crëpes de Puez vaciaria Val Badia Südtirol.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 21:37:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alpine meadows under the Pütia peak, the Puez range in Val Badia, South Tyrol - Unesco World Heritage Dolomites, Puez-Geisler Nature Park.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Italy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Alpine meadows under the Pütia peak, the Puez range in Val Badia, South Tyrol - Unesco World Heritage Dolomites, Puez-Geisler Nature Park. All by me Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. Is this a stitched Panorama or has your Hasselblad really 103MPix? -- -donald- (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A really beautiful view, from flowers in the foreground to the high peaks in the background. I also love the winding track which leads through the image. --Aristeas (talk) 10:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Obviously great. Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Easy on the eyes. Composition is great. --Dinkum (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I assume this is stitched panorama? The frame 2/3 along is blurred. You can see it on the huts and mountain portion. Perhaps shutter-shock? Do you have another frame to use? -- Colin (talk) 14:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The alignment is not correct. According to the calculation, the Cunturines should never appear in a higher perspective than the Furchetta. The coordinates are inaccurate. From the indicated place these mountains are not visible. Problems with unsharp frame. --Milseburg (talk) 15:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
    ✓ Done You are right, I corrected the coordinates, the perspective might not be very accurate --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice scenery, but sadly the left foreground is too blurry for me. --Ivar (talk) 18:28, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with Ivar, the first frame is really blurry, you should crop it. Some of the other frames are not great, but still acceptable to me given the image resolution Poco a poco (talk) 20:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks a little overexposed to me. Especially to be seen on the way in the foreground. I also think the sharpness in the left foreground is unacceptable for an excellent photo. (Compare the sharpness in the middle and right) Je-str (talk) 21:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Even after looking three times on three different displays, I cannot find an overexposed area on the way in the foreground. --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Bonsecours Market 324.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 20:22:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 20:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very soft (due to f/18 I suppose) and noisy, and the tone mapping applied (I guess) looks very unreal. --Kreuzschnabel 09:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment From the lights I guess this is an (early) blue hour shot. Wouldn’t it look better (and more realistic) if it was darker? Maybe also the somewhat soft sharpness is partially due to too much brightening. --Aristeas (talk) 11:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Wilfredor: Just to avoid misunderstandings: My comment was not intended as a rejection, but as a suggestion for improvement. Could you try to make the shadows (and maybe also the midtones) darker? Maybe then some of us will change their vote ;–). And even if that does not happen, the image itself may be better – IMHO your photo definitely is worth the extra work. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 17:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty, but I agree with Aristeas that it looks too light, as if the shadows have been lifted too much. Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like all the bright lights. But even without this problem I don't find this view interesting. --Dinkum (talk) 13:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Dinkum, not a compelling view Eve Teschlemacher (talk) 22:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Kreuz, Aristeas, Cmao20 , Dinkum and Eve Teschlemacher, I just uploaded another version without tonemapping, thanks for your reviews. And btw Aristeas my goal is not to get more FP, is more improve my skills, thanks and i love your review. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
It’s a different picture now. Minor fixes during voting period are acceptable, but in this case I encourage you to withdraw this nomination and place a fresh one for the second version. We cannot mix up votings on different images within the same nomination. --Kreuzschnabel 06:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I think this is a pretty good picture and has a nice mood, but I agree with Eve that it's not a compelling view. In other words, good but not great, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Plage de l'Horloge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 19:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Canada
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 19:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Could be sharper, but a very large file, still good at 300% of the 13-inch laptop's screen, with a nice composition and mood. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:28, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing is sharp (again, why f/18?), too much noise, distracting foreground object (stairs?), and I can’t see any clear composition nor subject here. What’s the monument – the beach, the bridge, the buildings? --Kreuzschnabel 09:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Like Ikan, I think sharpness is OK given the file size, and I actually like composition and mood. --Aristeas (talk) 10:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Are we talking about the same image? ;) 23.8 megapixels is really not that outstanding – here is a large size image where sharpness down to pixel level is not required. Even downscaled to 50 percent (i.e. 6 megapixels), this here candidate is still not sharp. f/18 on a DX size sensor is an odd decision if you want a sharp image, due to aperture diffraction growing along the pixel density. --Kreuzschnabel 22:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I completely agree with you that f/18 is not a good choice, especially on an APS-C camera (I would have used f/8 to f/11 on a “full-frame” camera). --Aristeas (talk) 08:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 11:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty noisy for ISO 100 and I also wonder why f/18. I do expect more sharpness for FP Poco a poco (talk) 20:33, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Kreuz and Poco a poco, please, take a look, I applied a selective denoise and selective sharpening. f/18 because I was looking to keep the beach and the bridge in the same plane. Thanks in advance for your reviews --Wilfredor (talk) 00:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Sharpness is a bit better now but you cannot regain details lost in exposure by subsequent sharpening. The water surface has not been done a favour by sharpening, and I’m still not sold on the composition. If the bridge is the main subject (as I understand), it’s way too distant and too little visible of it. --Kreuzschnabel 06:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The Bridge is only a element in the composition, the title is Beach Horloge (in french). --Wilfredor (talk) 07:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition mildly interesting but lighting isn't great, plus concrete steps at bottom are distracting. Eve Teschlemacher (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Artifacts on water. Sorry for not seeing those at first, but they've really bothered me since I saw them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Version without the concrete steps at bottom

SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Because Eve Teschlemacher recomendation --Wilfredor (talk) 07:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Less is more :) this is much clearer. However Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose there are sharpening artifacts now all over the frame (foreground sand as well as the background bridge) and the cloning is poorly done (i.e. with visible traces), no this is not at all an FP to me for technical drawbacks. --Kreuzschnabel 10:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Great improvement, much more relaxing to look at, but I'm sorry, I have to pull my vote from the other version and hold off here until it's clarified whether I'm looking at just wind or disturbing noise in the water. I'm talking about the small lines. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment How could this be wind? It’s on the umbrellas and in the sand as well. It’s sharpening artifacts – this image is hopelessly oversharpened in trying to save some detail from the unsharp shot at stopped-down aperture. --Kreuzschnabel 10:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
I come from fix the excesive oversharpening and artifacts in the water, please, take a look --Wilfredor (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Wilfredor: Just as a hint: As far as I can see, the fix was applied to the first (uncropped) version, but not to this cropped one; it should be fixed, too. --Aristeas (talk) 08:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Sorry, the water still looks unacceptable to me. -- 08:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ikan Kekek (talk • contribs) --Aristeas (talk) 08:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

File:Santa Maria della Carità organo Brescia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 14:29:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pipe organ by Giovanni Tonoli in the Santa Maria della Carità church in Brescia.

File:Schwetzingen - Schlossgarten - Moschee - Ansicht über den Moscheeweiher im Herbst 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 13:30:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Autumn view of the Red mosque in the gardens of Schwetzingen Palace, Germany.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Another shot by Aristeas. This is a really interesting one; it depicts the so-called Red Mosque, in Schwetzingen Palace, Germany. Strange as it sounds, it was never actually a working mosque; instead it was aimed to show Europe's newfound Enlightenment tolerance to other religious traditions. Created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you very much for nominating! --Aristeas (talk) 13:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The Red Mosque was build by Nicolas de Pigage as a part of the baroque park ensemble. In this photograph, I wanted to show the beautiful view or scene of the mosque together with its reflection in the pond and the old trees; I consider this as the view intended by de Pigage. It is not possible to show the complete mosque from this point of view, because always one part or another is covered by the trees; but I am sure this was considered by de Pigage, too.
    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristeas (talk • contribs) Cart (talk) 14:01, 19 November 2019 (UTC) (UTC)
  • A lot of trees can grow up in 200+ years, and parks change. Have you seen the original plans for the park? --Cart (talk) 14:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • You’re right that I was hasty in my statement. I want to apologize for that and have crossed out that part of the sentence. It would certainly be better to say that, given the care with which gardens were planned at the time, I think it is probable that the later growth of the trees was already being considered at that time. But in any case, this is the present state, and I wanted to document it with the photo. --Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:00, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice view, but the ugly bench spoils all for me. I wonder if you had the possibility to move it aside before taking the picture. --A.Savin 15:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I did not have the possibility -- these benches are quite heavy (I have once tried to move another one ;–). Therefore I decided to integrate it as foreground element. --Aristeas (talk) 16:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the bench, it's a nice counterpoint --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very peaceful, beautiful reflection of the mosque, nice fall foliage, and the simple white bench is nice, in my opinion, certainly not ugly. What its presence in the photo also does is to help the viewer imagine him-/herself sitting there and viewing the scene (though from a somewhat different vantage point). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 21:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very fine!--Isiwal (talk) 22:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I want to sit on this bench :-) Basile Morin (talk) 15:05, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:11, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 23:22, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Axel (talk) 23:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dinkum (talk) 11:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Tomb of Safdarjung in Delhi.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 10:26:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tomb of Safdarjung
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#India
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dey.sandip - uploaded by Dey.sandip - nominated by Dey.sandip -- Dey.sandip (talk) 10:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 10:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The sarcophagus isn't sharp enough, imo.--Peulle (talk) 10:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Well, I guess its subjective — Dey.sandip (talk) 12:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think the crop/perspective in WLM winner 2012 was better. Yours is too wide-angle, making the sarcophagus too small in the frame, which isn't the scale/perspective that seems appropriate for such a tomb. Most of the outer quarter of the image is not adding anything much. -- Colin (talk) 13:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin. A sharp version of the composition he links would probably be a worthy of an FP designation, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Old Gas Station Hamburg Grindel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 08:27:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Gas Station
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#German
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Capecross - nominated by Ivar (talk) 08:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 09:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Striking and really different from the usual submission here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Claus 09:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 10:39, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan, interesting and unusual work. Cmao20 (talk) 13:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Remembers me an aquarium --Llez (talk) 05:33, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment (You mean it reminds you of an aquarium. Human beings and animals can remember; things don't remember you.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:28, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the correction. That's what I wanted to say. --Llez (talk) 10:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Palau de la Música Catalana-Palace of Catalan Music (Image 2).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 08:20:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Palace of Catalan Music, in Barcelona

File:Libellulidae Brachythemis contaminata on Nelumbo nucifera leaf with water drops, in a pond.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 00:50:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Libellulidae Brachythemis contaminata on Nelumbo nucifera leaf with water drops, in a pond
  • Thanks for the tip. I've added a link in the description -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Different. Only the light could have been a bit softer but let's not be too picky. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:34, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Catedral de Salzburgo, Salzburgo, Austria, 2019-05-19, DD 30-32 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2019 at 19:54:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Central dome of Salzburg Cathedral, Austria.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Central dome of Salzburg Cathedral, Austria. The cathedral was founded in 774 and rebuilt in 1181 after a fire but it become its present Baroque style appearance under Prince-Bishop Wolf Dietrich von Raitenau in the 17th century. Note: there is already one FP of this subject. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Deserving, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Great, and I prefer the wider view, but I don't see why we need two FPs of an identical subject. Maybe if they were from a different angle or under different lighting, then yes, but given that this is basically a wider view focussing on the same place as the other FP, I don't think both should be featured. Honestly I'd support a delist and replace more than I would this. Cmao20 (talk) 22:51, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support because my vote is the seventh support so far and I couldn't bear not to see this promoted. I still think it's too similar, but it is also better than the existing FPs. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:38, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20. I'll support, if the other is delisted. --Ivar (talk) 08:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Technically perfect, but for me it looks just like a wider crop of this FP --Isiwal (talk) 10:48, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I have to confess that I love both views and can’t even decide which one I like better ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 14:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 05:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:20, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Kākāpō head.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2019 at 17:29:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juvenile kākāpō on Anchor Island in Dusky Sound, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Order_:_Psittaciformes_(Parrots)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Juvenile kākāpō on Anchor Island in Dusky Sound, New Zealand. The kakapo is critically endangered; the total known adult population is 213 living individuals, all of which are named. Most kakapo are kept on two predator-free islands, Codfish / Whenua Hou and Anchor, where they are closely monitored. Created by Kimberley Collins - uploaded by FunkMonk - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good detailed pic of an endangered species. Cmao20 (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition does not work for me at all, the crop is too tight. Very noisy. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition, kakalo head should be seen in whole. -- Karelj (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Uoaei1 Poco a poco (talk) 20:20, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the head should be pictured as a whole. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think that the photo is good enough for FP even though it's such a rare species. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The focal point enhances the bird's expression, and gives a feel of texture to the feathers, and detail to the eye, beak and nares. These are features we don't normally see with such close-up detail, especially for rare and endangered species. Good job!! Atsme Talk 📧 17:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Gipfelkreuz Großer Weitschartenkopf.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2019 at 12:57:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Summit of Großer Weitschartenkopf
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Simple summit cross on the Großer Weitschartenkopf. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 12:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 12:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 13:39, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:48, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - well done with good descriptive notes. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 17:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great work. The excellent composition of this one is, for me, what was missing from your last candidate, but it's definitely here. Cmao20 (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The background is not very sharp and the colours rather dull. No WOW for me--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 05:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I have to agree with Moroder here. Not much more wow than in any summit shot, background too hazy. Since the main subject is actually the cross (according to file name), this is not an outstanding picture of it IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 09:33, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I've lived with this photo for a while, and my feeling, ultimately, is that the composition works. The haze in the distance is no problem, IMO, and the bank of bright white clouds on the left side beyond the hazy, distant mountains helps. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Moroder. —kallerna (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support An excellent focus to main object and the haze in the distance is natural --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:20, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Werktagsseite 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2019 at 08:09:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winged altar St. Michael ob Rauchenödt

File:Sympetrum sanguineum - Leucate 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2019 at 21:38:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sympetrum sanguineum (Ruddy darter), female; Cap Leucate

File:Blue Hour at Pakistan Monument.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2019 at 15:05:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Muh.Ashar - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 15:05, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:05, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely light. The tourists aren't too bothersome, and do provide a scale. Shame the reflection is not captured right to the bottom, within something blurred at the bottom, but this is not too distracting. -- Colin (talk) 17:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Certainly featurable, do you think anything could be done about the colour banding/posterization in the sky? --Kreuzschnabel 17:27, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If I am wrong about this, please let me know. The resolution for this image in Commons is listed as 6000 x 4000 pixels yet the Nikon D7200 listed in the metadata produces a DX-format image with a maximum resolution of 4800 x 3200 pixels. Over-sampling does not help this image and there is nothing wrong with a DX-format image if well done. Suggest it be uploaded again at the native resolution of 4800 x 3200 pixels, or less if it has been cropped. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I have no problem delivering photos with a greater pixel count than my camera's output by combining a few shots. It's quite popular these days, and most newbies don't know it could be useful to declare it in the file description. So the more proper question should be: Muh.Ashar, is this photo made up from several photos, or is it an upsized single shot? It would be great if you could clarify that. --Cart (talk) 18:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I see one stitching error (note added), so imo it's stitched image. Posterization on the sky is too big for me to support. --Ivar (talk) 19:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg support conditionally, assuming the highlighted errors are fixed. lovely otherwise. — Rhododendrites talk |  21:45, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Rhododendrites, can you make your vote clearer? Tomer T (talk) 14:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
      • @Tomer T: ? I just used the support template, so the bot shouldn't be confused. It was conditional on the edits which have been made, it seems, so no problems here. — Rhododendrites talk |  22:08, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting blurred people, next time you could use layers with different shoots to delete the people --Wilfredor (talk) 01:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice mood and reflection, but agree about colour banding and pixelated sky (especially clearly visible just above the structure in the middle). There is also a stitching error in the lower left corner. --A.Savin 02:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
    Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral for now. The banding has been reduced in parts, yet not sufficiently fixed. --A.Savin 19:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • W.carter Yes it is single image.
  • Muh.Ashar, is that you answering? You have to log in so that we can see that it's you answering. I also wonder how there can be stitching error in the image if it's just one photo? --Cart (talk) 09:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @GRDN711, W.carter, A.Savin, Cmao20: the Nikon D7200 is natively capable of shooting 6000x4000 24MP image. So I don't know where the idea comes from it is limited to 4800 x 3200 pixels. I think the small irregularity with the line is more likely to be an imperfect attempt to clone out something distracting (litter?). I don't think the line mismatch is noticable enough to oppose, though the pixellation in the sky is a bit troublesome. -- Colin (talk) 15:39, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Colin, W.carter, A.Savin, Cmao20: Thank you, Colin for the clarification. Per the Nikon spec sheet for the D7200, the maximum resolution is 6000 x 4000 pixels. There is also a 1.3x crop mode for this camera at 4800 x 3200 pixels which was my point of confusion. Sorry about that! As I now understand it, this blue hour picture is a single image of 6000 x 4000 pixels. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • No matter what it actually is, it might be a good idea to crop away the lowest part, so that the error and the blurred object are not in the picture. I may support the image only if the issue with the pixelated sky is fixed too; which (if ever fixable) requires a new development. --A.Savin 16:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Muh.Ashar: Just for curious, Muhammad – is this a single image taken on a tripod at f/11 with a single 20-second exposure, or is there HDR stitching (built-in or post-processing) from multiple exposures of the same image to accommodate the high dynamic range in lighting? --GRDN711 (talk) 16:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • It would be so much easier if everyone would just sign their comments so we knew directly who is saying what. This isn't Twitter. --Cart (talk) 16:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per the stitching error noted by A. Savin, but I think I would support if fixed. Cmao20 (talk) 08:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better now. Cmao20 (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This image represents a technical challenge but is well done. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting blurred people and pixellation in the sky. --Isiwal (talk) 17:55, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info @Muh.Ashar: I have made some corrections, please revert if you don't like the result. Also pinging all previous voters for another review: @Tomer T, Colin, W.carter, A.Savin, Cmao20, GRDN711, Isiwal, Wilfredor, Rhododendrites, Kreuzschnabel: --Ivar (talk) 19:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Ivar, thanks very much for the corrections! Tomer T (talk) 20:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Continue to support after corrections. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:57, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support after corrections. --Ivar (talk) 20:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 21:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support after corrections, thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - The corrections help a lot, but I feel very frustrated by the crop of the reflection, so I think I'll abstain from voting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Iifar: Thanks it look great after your kind effort. Further it's not HDR as i said it is single shot. @Ikan Kekek: sorry if the cropped reflection bothering you but this was the max focal length i got at that time and was trying to keep image straight so bit cropped from bottom. Thanks for your kind input as well. -- Muh.Ashar (talk)
  • Certainly. Of course I understand that photographers deal with limitations, but all I have to consider is the resulting image. This one is ever-so-close to being an FP to me, but clearly, a consensus of other voters here believe it is an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great subject and lighting but per Isiwal Poco a poco (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Colin. I don't find the people all that bothersome; they're not the subject of the image and frankly the etherealness that creates makes a nice balance to the solidity of the monument. Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Svyatogorsk cloudscape.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2019 at 13:08:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Holy Mountains Monastery, Sviatohirsk, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine. created by Balkhovitin - uploaded by Balkhovitin - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Nice view but the main subject is too shady against the dramatic clouds IMHO, and the entire image rather on the soft side for its size. Camera moved a bit to the left would have made the reflected mountain entirely visible :) The cut-off building on the left doesn’t look too pretty either. --Kreuzschnabel 17:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:44, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful clouds and a nice reflection --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support - I'd like for the main subject to be brighter, but to me the main subject is actually the sky... — Rhododendrites talk |  21:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In that case, the FP categorization ought to be altered accordingly; in the nominator’s eyes, the buildings is the main subject IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 06:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
      • Are you suggesting I should change it to 'Natural phenomena'? Happy to do so if others agree. Cmao20 (talk) 08:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The clouds are nice, but also too dominant and otherwise there is not much of eye-catching things for me in the picture. Some of the buildings seem tilted and overall it's a bit too dark. --A.Savin 01:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Colors are a bit cold in my view, but the reflection adds something. Special sky and interesting building -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose After a couple of days of looking at this image and noting that there are attractive elements, IMO it's not quite FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose after much thought. This is a very pretty image, especially in certain areas (the clouds and the buildings and reflections of them), but the composition really has never added up to me. There's really nothing balancing the strong motion of the streaming clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per A.Savin -- Karelj (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per A.Savin. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Dactylorhiza incarnata nothosubsp. versicolor1 - Keila.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2019 at 12:03:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dactylorhiza incarnata nothosubsp. versicolor
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Ivar (talk) 12:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:07, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose DOF too shallow. Floral parts in front are out of focus and those in back out of focus. Only parts in the middle are in focus. This should have been focus stacked. Seven Pandas (talk) 02:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @Seven Pandas: Very harsh review. This is not a single shot! Dof is exactly as I intended it to be: 7 stacked images. Commons has no image of Dactylorhiza with this kind of detail and dof. --Ivar (talk) 06:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Vamps (talk) 18:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good for me. Enough DOF to see lovely details of the flower, nice soft transition to out-of-focus areas. --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too cluttered to me Poco a poco (talk) 20:22, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Doesn't really stand out to me compared with our other flower FPs. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel Case -- Karelj (talk) 19:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Graureiher Ardea cinerea-4883.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2019 at 09:34:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Grey herons are only visitors of Tiergarten Schönbrunn, they are not captive, have no bird banding and are using the rich feeding grounds all over the park, created by Isiwal - uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Isiwal -- Isiwal (talk) 09:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Isiwal (talk) 09:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Grey Herons are relatively easy to spot and to take pictures of; so for an FP I'd expect more of the wow factor. Now while the quality is quite good, I don't like the light and the background that much, sorry. --A.Savin 01:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A. Savin has a point, but the quality is really very good indeed. Cmao20 (talk) 08:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Like Cmao20, I find the quality and level of details very good. --Dinkum (talk) 12:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Crisp sharp. --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The photo might be good for illustration of the mimicry ability, but for the FP I would expect more contrasting background. I agree with A.Savin. — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:45, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I looked at a few of the existing FPs of this species, and this photo is toward the better side of the ones that show the bird's entire body. I particularly like the sharpness of its legs and feet. I find the background fine, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per the opposers above but still a nice shot Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:55, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Both pro and contra arguments are good, but looking again and again at it I really like it, espec. when viewing it at full size. --Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes, very good quality. But per others due to the background, sorry. --Hockei (talk) 19:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose after looking at existing FP-s of Ardea cinerea, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 16:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the background shows well why a heron has such colors - it nearly blends in with its environment. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-105.90.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2019 at 09:20:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scanned image of thin section from Siilinjärvi apatite ore in cross polarised transmitted light.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks and minerals
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 09:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support —kallerna (talk) 09:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Due to scale on image. I forget where the guidelines are, but I'm pretty sure we are encouraged to avoid text on such images and to use the description to state how wide or tall the whole image is. Then if anyone wants to overlay a scale, they can and do it with whichever text style is consistent with their other images. Currently the scale limits the reuse. It is fairly pretty, but when I look through Category:Rocks in thin section I see quite a lot of pretty images. Even from this one sample, this one is more colourful. So I'm not sure what to judge here to say it is among our finest. -- Colin (talk) 11:36, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Template:NoCoins suggests using a ruler like this. Feel free to nominate others from the category, most of those are photomicrographs, this one is taken with a different method. The image you linked is not from the same sample nor the same thin section. IMO both could be FPs. —kallerna (talk) 12:37, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • {{NoCoins}} isn't policy, just someone's opinion. A ruler or scale is more appropriate where the image has a background that the ruler can be positioned nearby the subject. Here the scale overlays the subject in a way that can't be removed. See File:Aluminium bar surface etched.jpg for example of FP with no scale and with measurement in the description. There aren't any other FPs where the scale is intrusive on the subject. -- Colin (talk) 17:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • That is the vital point -- we ensure any scale is in the body text or easily removed or cropped out. -- Colin (talk) 14:13, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I find this a better composition and at least equally interesting combination of textures as the other one (I like the areas with parallel lines in different directions), but I agree that the other one could also be an FP. We could have a few of them. I recall we've previously featured micrographs with scales on the image. The scales are useful, though I could imagine how it could limit reuse. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:24, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You could simply include a version without the scale in the file history (upload it and upload the one with the scale again) or make a second version without it. That way people can choose if they want the scale or if they want to use another unit for measuring. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The scale spoils it -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others and it's hard to focus your eyes on it Seven Pandas (talk) 02:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support scales create a deeper educational value. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 18:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

Scanned image of thin section from Siilinjärvi apatite ore in cross polarised transmitted light.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I've uploaded a alternative file without the scale. —kallerna (talk) 17:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - If you saw this as an abstract painting in an art show, would you be happy with it? I would. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Exactly my reflection, before I read your comment -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:18, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Might be inspiring for modern artist painters -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok for me - with or without ruler--Isiwal (talk) 09:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose scales create a deeper educational value. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 18:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others -- Karelj (talk) 09:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No scale in this one. —kallerna (talk) 13:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Can I remind those voting against this one without the scale overlay that Commons is an educational media repository, not a publisher. As a repository, our highest value is to ensure the image can be used in the most ways. A book or website containing images of such rocks will want to present them in a consistent fashion with the scale either in the caption area or overlayed using the same font, size and colour text for all images. As soon as we put our own scale obscuring the image, we limit use, and limit language. The book might not even consider scale important to the usage. This image could also be used as a book cover for a book on rocks or indeed anything, but can't if there's a big ----1mm---- scale on top. However, Kallerna, you need to then describe the image dimensions in the body text, which should be a simple task of multiplication. -- Colin (talk) 14:13, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I see no reason why we can't have the one with the scale for educational purposes and this one to be an FP. Certainly it does not lose its educational value entirely without the scale. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Παραλία Αγίου Παύλου Ρεθύμνης 2947-Pano.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2019 at 08:22:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Agios Pavlos, Crete
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Greece
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • The sandy beach of Agios Pavlos, Crete, with its clear waters. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- C messier (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment So sad nobody’s commenting on this one :) To me it’s just a nice touristic shot suitable for a glossy brochure but BA candidate.svg Weak oppose nothing special in a compositional way. --Kreuzschnabel 22:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I've been unsure for days and was even prepared to oppose until I took another look, but I'm finding that the composition works, and I like the colors, lines and textures. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree with Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Noisy at distance, but not egregiously so. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Hendrik Goltzius, The Great Hercules, 1589, NGA 70311.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2019 at 20:48:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - It looks like the source file, when enlarged to the greatest extent possible, is almost 150% of the size of this file; however, when enlarged to that size, this file looks just as good as the source file. Sorry for the confusion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:10, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Brwz (talk) 13:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice enough as a piece of historical art, but I just cannot bring myself to vote for a drawing so anatomically incorrect.--Peulle (talk) 14:44, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • A lot of art is anatomically incorrect, it's in the concept of artistic freedom. This is an artistic interpretation of the mythological figure Hercules, much like an yester-years version of the Hulk, no one expects it to have normal anatomical standards. --Cart (talk) 19:09, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • On the other hand, lots of art from this time (and even earlier art, such as statues from Antiquity) were more correct than this one. I don't agree with the artist's interpretation, put it that way. He blew it.--Peulle (talk) 10:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Perth (AU), Elizabeth Quay Bridge -- 2019 -- 0346-8.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2019 at 20:50:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Australia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by XRay - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:50, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:50, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is a good night shot. However, the lower area is rather uninteresting although the eyes are automatically attracted by it.--Ermell (talk) 08:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Ermell Poco a poco (talk) 13:06, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Disagree with others. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I think the composition would be better if the area with cobblestones or most of it were cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A solid QI but IMO not quite FP. One's eyes are certainly immediately drawn to the huge cobbled area with its distracting road markings. Cmao20 (talk) 07:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 10:47, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ermell.--Fischer.H (talk) 14:56, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Alternative[edit]

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Alternative 2[edit]

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Pavillon de Flore from the Tuileries Garden, Paris 5 November 2019.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2019 at 18:03:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pavillon de Flore from the Tuileries Garden, Paris
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ali Sabbagh (Flickr) - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 18:03, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 18:03, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting composition and beautiful clouds, but unfortunately too much shadow at the main object --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:50, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like the drama of the photo, and I don't think it's problematic that part of the building is in shadow. This is a complex composition, not a mere photo of a building, and too much sameness becomes a kind of conservative conventionality here, which I think is bad for creativity and artistry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:45, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very beautiful, but it is slightly leaning counter clockwise and IMHO, it needs a bit more space at the bottom. --C messier (talk) 08:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I think the light and composition are superb here. Cmao20 (talk) 07:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ikan and Cmao20 convinced me. --Aristeas (talk) 09:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Tomer T (talk) 18:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan; the clouds scream autumn. Daniel Case (talk) 06:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Birds and sea.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2019 at 20:04:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seabirds in Sea of Marmara (istanbul)
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A beautiful photo, but since you now have several QIs and FPs, it's about time you started to learn how to categorize your photos correctly. You are using the "tagging" system, which (sadly) is not what is used on Commons. Other friendly users have helped you so far, but as you are becoming a regular here, you need to be able to do this yourself. Please take a look at Commons:Categories. --Cart (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @W.carter: you're right. thanks for your suggestions and your kind.--Amirpashaei (talk) 10:51, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @W.carter: thanks. i read it. that was very helpful.--Amirpashaei (talk) 11:46, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Will support once this is fixed. Seven Pandas (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Certainly dramatic and a worthwile contribution to Commons, but it doesn't seem quite sharp to me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:47, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cmao. There are also CAs at many of the birds --Llez (talk) 06:06, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20 and Llez. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20 and Llez. --Cart (talk) 15:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. Nice idea with some wow but the drawbacks are too severe: Posterization in the sky, CAs on birds, contrast too harsh (white parts of plumage blown), insufficient sharpness, WB a bit on the reddish side IMHO. Exif data would be fine, geocoding is nearly a must for such a shot.
    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreuzschnabel (talk • contribs) Cart (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC) (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg moral support - it really is a great shot, but there are many technical problems mentioned above, and I don't think it's fixable at this stage. — Rhododendrites talk |  21:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kreuzschnabel. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:06, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. No there there. Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

File:De Posbank IMG 2340 2019-08-25 09.14.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2019 at 19:26:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Heather at the Posbank

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It was the right time to make a photo of the heath and the Postbank might be the best place in my country for this --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow per others. Certainly a nice enough spot but I cannot see any careful composition here. 2 metres to the left, the path could have given a nice line leading into the scene, but as obstructed as it is by the foreground shrubbery, it doesn’t work. --Kreuzschnabel 09:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good image, certainly QI, but not FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:20, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not an excellent picture for me. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Might've worked with raking light and a bluer sky. Daniel Case (talk) 22:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Toy Poodle wearing clothes in Tokyo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2019 at 02:57:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Toy Poodle wearing clothes in Tokyo
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, adorable but not eligible for FP. —kallerna (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I think it's just a case where Kallerna doesn't know the common translations of the words "not eligible". Please look it up on Google translate. In most cases it means "not permitted", but in a few rare cases it can be used for "not good enough" and that is probably what Kallerna means. --Cart (talk) 10:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is pretty good to me, it's nice and sharp, and the expression is wonderful. Cmao20 (talk) 15:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. Refreshing! --Aristeas (talk) 17:10, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support clothes on dogs ... they probably don't like it, but undeniably cute and the image is sharp/simply framed. — Rhododendrites talk |  21:57, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 19:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Midvinterblot (Carl Larsson) - Nationalmuseum - edited.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2019 at 19:08:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Midvinterblot (" Midwinter Blót/Sacrifice"), oil painting by Carl Larsson in Swedish National Museum of Fine Arts, Stockolm.
This is one of the most noted paintings in Sweden. It is actually rectangular, but it is almost never photographed or depicted that way since it was made for this grand hall and the artist intended for it so be seen like this, framed by the arch of the ceiling. It is also very tricky to photograph the full painting due to the architecture of the hall. Given how important the painting is, I was surprised at only finding murky shots. I worked with the TIF from Nationalmuseum since it was better and had more information than the Google art file. I think this is the best way to show the painting, with as little as possible of the distracting hall, but with some of the arch included for context. -- Cart (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cart (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I am very impressed by your description --Andrei (talk) 10:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Well done! --Gnosis (talk) 16:17, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:18, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 00:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good photo, especially given the difficult situation (cf. nomination and photos of the hall). --Aristeas (talk) 10:57, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good editing. --Axel (talk) 11:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:11, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fascinating painting with lots to look at. Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 08:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Aggressive cut with too much thing space, dynamic range lost in some areas in the shadow compensation procedure --Wilfredor (talk) 01:35, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Peulle (talk) 10:51, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:32, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP category: Non-photographic media/Religion#Paganism


Fjerning av utmerket-status[edit]

Etterhvert hender det at statusen for utmerka bilder endres. Bilder som tidligere var bra nok, vil kanskje ikke lenger bli ansett som det. Her listes bilder som du ikke lenger synes fortjener å være det. Da trengs to tredels majoritet (og minst fem stemmer) som er enig i å fjerne statusen fra bildet. Dersom ikke to tredeler av stemmene er enig i å fjerne statusen, blir den beholdt. Her stemmer man med {{keep}} (behold bildet som utmerka) eller {{delist}} (bildet fortjener ikke lenger å være utmerka). Når du nominerer et bilde her, ta med lenka til den opprinnelige nominasjonen (den finnes under Lenker på bildets beskrivelsesside. Bruk denne lenka for å legge til en fjerningskandidat.

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:19-11-09-Alte-Nationalgalerie DSF4154.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 22:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alte Nationalgalerie Berlin, Kuppel im ersten Obergeschoss

File:Nevelzwam (nebularis) tussen afgevallen beukenblad (d.j.b.) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 17:39:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Stata Center (05689p)2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 17:13:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stata Center at MIT
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Stata Center at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, designed by Frank Gehry. created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites talk |  17:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  17:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice photo, but the right crop close to the bottom is cut, so for me no FP --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Michiel makes a good point, but without even considering that, as I said in the nomination of your other photo of this building, this composition doesn't work for me, either, because the building has unbalanced movement, especially to the right. An accurate portrayal of a building that is its own unbalanced composition could be a useful VI, but that doesn't make it an FP to me, unless there's something complementing it in order to produce a composition that satisfies me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:2017.07.22.-01-Leutershausen an der Bergstraße--Oberrheinische Tiefebene.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 17:17:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oberrheinische Tiefebene
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 17:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Hockei (talk) 17:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This looks like a quite common landscape image, I don't see this special enough to be a FP, sorry. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:10, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basotxerri, and there’s poor detail which is not excusable at that small image size. JPEG artifacts visible on the roofs/gables. Left half of background is tilted CCW (see chimneys). Sorry, this is a nice view but by no means an outstanding image of it. --Kreuzschnabel 20:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Es war mir schon klar, dass du kommst und wieder einmal Gründe erfindest oder aufbauschst um ein oder das Foto abzulehnen. "tilted" ist es kaum und das bisschen kommt daher, weil bergab fotografiert ist. Es ist ganz natürlich. Das müsstest du eigentlich wissen oder willst es vielleicht gar nicht. Ich kann mich an Fotos erinnern, die viel mehr "tilted" waren und hier trotzdem akzeptiert wurden. Es gibt auch keine "JPEG artifacts". Was auch immer du da siehst, hat nichts mit "JPEG artifacts" zu tun. Eher wohl mit atmosphärischen Verhältnissen. Denn es war keine klare Sicht, sondern eher dieslich. Sonne und Regen im Wechsel. Daher aus deiner Sicht wohl auch "poor detail". Und, was heißt eigentlich "small image size"? Also, die Frage stelle ich mir selbst. Offenbar willst du irgendwie Kameras mit 20MP-Sensoren hier nicht akzeptieren, raushaben, schätze ich. Es müssen wohl mindestens 40 MP sein. Denn ich habe das Foto ja lediglich von 4:3 auf 16:9 geändert. Es ist also die volle Auflösung. Unglaublich. --Hockei (talk) 21:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Rawlinna (AU), Indian Pacific Express -- 2019 -- 0597.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 06:55:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Indian Pacific Express in Rawlinna, Western Australia, Australia
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 06:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 06:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose We have a lot of train FPs, and this one I feel is missing something to be considered one of the best on Commons. Just looks like a good QI to me.--Peulle (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I agree. QI and VI if nominated, but not a great composition like, for example, some of Kabelleger's pictures of trains in gorgeous panoramas. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice shot and a quality QI, but per Ikan and Peulle I've seen better-composed train photos. Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination I see ... and agree. --XRay talk 13:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Woodend Beach, Canterbury, New Zealand (6).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 05:18:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Woodend Beach, Canterbury, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/New Zealand
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's Woodend Beach lifgtened with the last bits of sun. -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Surely nice lighting but I can’t see anything outstanding here to feature. Random crop, little wow. --Kreuzschnabel 06:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I would also expect a little bit nicer weather. Otherwise nice. -- -donald- (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kreuzschnabel.--Peulle (talk) 07:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's simply a beautiful view. --Hockei (talk) 10:34, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Works well to me. Not all FPs have to be under a bright blue sky. Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

talk">talk]]) 07:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel -- Karelj (talk) 20:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:New Zealand bush during the rain, Mt Oxford area, Canterbury, New Zealand.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2019 at 05:18:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

New Zealand bush during the rain, Mt Oxford area, Canterbury, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/New Zealand
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by me. It's a New Zealand bush in the rain. -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is way more interesting than your other nomination but the rain idea is somewhat not in the pic itself, just in the description. I’d like to see some raindrops falling or something like that. --Kreuzschnabel 06:23, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very nice. But I am missing something like the ground at the bottom. -- -donald- (talk) 07:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but I don't see the big wow factor. Perhaps someone who doesn't see woods like this one every day will be more excited.--Peulle (talk) 07:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As one who is constantly trying to capture the perfect rain photo, I know how insanely difficult it is to shoot falling rain (it always ends up looking like fog/overcast/mist to viewers). You can't get the drops visible enough if you don't have a counter light, so instead you have to go for the special light and colors that a pouring rain creates. I think this would be much better if you just went with concentrating on the light in part of the forest instead of the whole wet place. I would recommend a square(ish) crop to do this, see note. --Cart (talk) 10:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great atmosphere. --Hockei (talk) 10:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Hockei. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mist -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Fruit on a plate 2019 G1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 22:59:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fruit on a plate. Pear, figs, persimmons, bitter melon (momordica), plums and tangerines. Marmaris, Turkey
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, the compo doesn't appeal to me. Fruit photos often work better of the fruits are bunched together in tasty-looking delicious heaps with perhaps some items trailing off from the main bunch, this is too scattered. The top down light doesn't help either, a light slightly from the side would give better volume to the subject. --Cart (talk) 09:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Nice shot overall but I do see where Cart is coming from. Cmao20 (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Harsh light, and the composition with pistachios well scattered around the plate lack natural -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's the harsh flash light. --C messier (talk) 16:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but the light is not good. --Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Castillo de Hohenwerfen, Werfen, Austria, 2019-05-17, DD 143-149 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 20:31:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Courtyard and surroundings of castle Hohenwerfen, Werfen, near Salzburg, Austria.

File:Boulders Beach 2019 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 17:24:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African penguins (Spheniscus demersus), Boulders Beach, Simon's Town, South Africa.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info It's a raw file from the camera. Small adjustments done to this version. —kallerna (talk) 18:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Fascinating place but I find the framing a little bit random in terms of how it cuts off some of the penguins at the edges. It's a difficult one to know how to get right, but I think a wider framing might have been a bit better Cmao20 (talk) 13:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20: The wider shot you may be looking for is this FP by Poco, and there's also this nice narrow but long shot, although that one wouldn't make it if nominated today. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Naissance du Wetr.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 14:50:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dancers during a Wetr creation tale dance in Lifou, New Caledonia, Melanesia.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Dancers during a Wetr creation tale dance in a cave in Lifou, New Caledonia, Melanesia.
    Created and uploaded by Oroffino Michel - nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great composition, light and colors. -- Cart (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Was thinking about nominating it too, very great picture. Thank you for translation from French --Andrei (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Yes, some really great photos came out of that competition. It might be worth looking at all the uploads from it, not just the winners, since wise from WLM we know local juries make their decisions based on other criteria than we at FPC do. --Cart (talk) 16:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I wish there weren't such a tight crop at the bottom, but a fascinating photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -Bijay chaurasia (talk) 19:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 07:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I wish the little guy wasn't holding his hand in front of his face but otherwise excellent.--Peulle (talk) 07:38, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very interesting photo. Cmao20 (talk) 07:54, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --C messier (talk) 16:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:La pirogue à balancier.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 13:08:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The canoe is an integral part of Polynesian life. It is used as means of transport between villages or houses and in sports activities on the water.
  • Looks perfectly ok to me. In many spots the color of the light reflected on the waves is the same as the color of the reflected clouds so the patches become almost uniform in color and some may see that as 'blurry' in a photo. Light on waves can make very strange patterns sometimes. --Cart (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not an excellent picture for me.--Fischer.H (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Too much not very interesting sky and water and not enough canoe. Also, the message about canoes being integral to Polynesian life is undercut by the "RAINA TOURS [phone number]" text on the front canoe, and a closeup would make the photo even more of an advertisement. I recognize that some people consider this kind of image highly artistic, but it's not that interesting to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Ikan Poco a poco (talk) 20:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really great. Yes, a bit unusual for what we're used to see here but that's makes it special. I can imagine the photo to be in an exhibition hall as an example of minimalist photography. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Terrible quality, but I do see myself hanging this at home. Beautiful minimalism. - Benh (talk) 21:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 07:40, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Benh and Podzemnik. Cmao20 (talk) 07:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others. -- Colin (talk) 13:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Wonderful composition. IMO there are JPEG artifacts. So please upload an uncompressed image. --XRay talk 13:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:04, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Not sharp at full size, but per Podzemnik and Benh. One of mine, similar to this, failed last August, but I like this kind. Space evokes me freedom and tranquility -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I voted for that photo. It has a much better composition than this one, in my opinion: Because of all the individual trees and reflections thereof, it is not static like this one, even though it's certainly a peaceful image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose heavy compression and composition is weak. --Ivar (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - beauty in its simplicity. I echo Cart's "Ahhhhh..." Atsme Talk 📧 17:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg NeutralGA candidate.svg Weak support Great minimalism, gives me a sigh of relief, but quality is not as good, and (as Ikan noted) the advertising on the canoe is irritating. --Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes, it’s nice, but image quality is below FP threshold IMHO. Puzzling rendering of water surface as mentioned by me above, and the only thing within the frame is unsharp (motion blur). --Kreuzschnabel 20:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Peilstein 20191012 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2019 at 05:40:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peilstein
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Lower Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Sunset at autumnal Peilstein mountain in the Vienna Woods, Lower Austria. Can you find all the climbers? All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very high quality, but I need something more in the foreground. --Claus 06:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Technically great, still the wow on the subject itself is limited on my side. Saturation/contrast looks a bit overdone, the forest is too dark to me. --Kreuzschnabel 07:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support good work. Very well composed and detailed portrait of this interesting mountain. The high resolution makes viewing not easy and does not have to be IMO. But the climbers are an eye-catcher in full resolution, which is pleasantly sharp. --Milseburg (talk) 15:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very bland composition - Benh (talk) 21:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Huge file, and undoubtedly a VI if nominated, but I find the composition pretty inert. Nothing much helps my eyes move around the picture frame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Boston Public Garden (36008p).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2019 at 23:06:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boston Public Garden
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#United_States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info panorama from eight images, created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites talk |  23:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A lovely morning in the Public Garden in Boston, Massachusetts (but it was actually -7°C at the time) — Rhododendrites talk |  23:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like how the trees on both sides rhyme. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is something like a flying branch in the sky top left of the left tree – I would remove that, IMHO it’s irritating. ;–) --Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 07:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - nice framing, Rhododendrites. Atsme Talk 📧 17:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Stata Center (05773p).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2019 at 22:39:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rear of the Stata Center at MIT
  • Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info stitched from four frames, created/uploaded/nominated by — Rhododendrites talk |  22:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is the rear of the Stata Center building at MIT, designed by Frank Gehry. I took several shots of this building while there last week and selected this one because it's a less common perspective and captures a mix of styles the building incorporates. — Rhododendrites talk |  22:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good architect, good image! --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think this is not the best angle of view of this building.--Claus 06:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great architecture on the building but the shady foreground does not make it look favourable. You’ll certainly find a better lighting for this. Architecture photographs should be crisp sharp and noise-free, so a tripod is highly recommendable :) --Kreuzschnabel 07:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Kreuzschnabel, W.carter: Thanks. So I actually have two uploads built from the same 10 frames, that one and File:Stata Center (05689p)2.jpg. I decided to use two different stitching modes, work on both images, and see which one I liked better. I didn't intend to upload both, actually, because to my eyes the proportions of the second one are closer to what I remember it looking like (the top of the first one appears a bit squished, and the end result is quite a bit smaller, too). But that makes me curious why the first one stood out? — Rhododendrites talk |  16:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting place but that unsightly metal crate thing in the foreground is quite annoying, and I also think too much of the image is in shadow. I would definitely vote for the image Kreuzschnabel links to, though. Cmao20 (talk) 07:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - For this composition to work for me, I think you would have needed a strong somewhat diagonal cloud, going across and somewhat down from right to left. The other photo doesn't really work for me, either. I think it's quite challenging to get a really satisfying photo of this building, because of its own very unbalanced composition that needs a complement somewhere in the picture. I know many people won't agree with me about that because they think that Gehry is a great genius, and therefore, every Gehry building is ipso facto great and a fully resolved composition by itself, and it's OK that there are different views about this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • I kinda agree with you, great architecture doesn't automatically make for great photos, mostly because the buildings are so demanding themselves. It's often easier to make great photos of simple buildings since you can add to the scene through the use of a camera. --Cart (talk) 09:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination thanks for the feedback — Rhododendrites talk |  14:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Spb Anichkov Palace asv2019-09 img15.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2019 at 17:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wooden ceiling of the library in Anichkov Palace
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Russia
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Wooden ceiling of the library room in Baroque Anichkov Palace, Saint Petersburg ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 17:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 17:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Oversharpened (artifacts visible on the candelabra). Not enough to oppose though because of the great rendering of the ceiling. --Kreuzschnabel 07:12, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not convinced about the bottom crop and the chosen perspective Poco a poco (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per poco. Lots of unfortunate crops. - Benh (talk) 21:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks like a beautiful place, and I don't think it's oversharpened, but I agree with Poco and Benh about the crops. Cmao20 (talk) 07:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition. Normal picture, not so special -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Tagblume Commelina communis stack25 2019-08-05-RM-8050218-PSD.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2019 at 09:32:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Flower of a dayflower (Commelina communis). Stacked with Helicon Focus from 25 frames
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order_:_Commelinales
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Flower of a dayflower (Commelina communis). Stacked with Helicon Focus from 25 frames. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 09:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 10:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - This looks to me to have broken new ground in flower photos on Commons. Strong support! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. --Dinkum (talk) 12:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Though I think you should consider whether the "stack25 2019-08-05-RM-8050218-PSD" details in the filename are relevant to anyone but yourself. The date perhaps. I have set my LR Mediawiki uploader to use the "Copy Name" Lightroom field for the wiki filename, giving me control over the name uploaded for Commons vs filename on disc. It also has the advantage that virtual copies can all be uploaded with different names if required. -- Colin (talk) 14:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the hint. Very good idea.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -Bijay chaurasia (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 19:43, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support although I don't see any info about shooting place. --Ivar (talk) 20:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info added.--Ermell (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Axel (talk) 23:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Claus 06:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Respect. -- -donald- (talk) 07:39, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Crëpes de Puez vaciaria Val Badia Südtirol.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 21:37:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alpine meadows under the Pütia peak, the Puez range in Val Badia, South Tyrol - Unesco World Heritage Dolomites, Puez-Geisler Nature Park.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Italy
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Alpine meadows under the Pütia peak, the Puez range in Val Badia, South Tyrol - Unesco World Heritage Dolomites, Puez-Geisler Nature Park. All by me Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. Is this a stitched Panorama or has your Hasselblad really 103MPix? -- -donald- (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support A really beautiful view, from flowers in the foreground to the high peaks in the background. I also love the winding track which leads through the image. --Aristeas (talk) 10:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Obviously great. Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Easy on the eyes. Composition is great. --Dinkum (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I assume this is stitched panorama? The frame 2/3 along is blurred. You can see it on the huts and mountain portion. Perhaps shutter-shock? Do you have another frame to use? -- Colin (talk) 14:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The alignment is not correct. According to the calculation, the Cunturines should never appear in a higher perspective than the Furchetta. The coordinates are inaccurate. From the indicated place these mountains are not visible. Problems with unsharp frame. --Milseburg (talk) 15:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
    ✓ Done You are right, I corrected the coordinates, the perspective might not be very accurate --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very nice scenery, but sadly the left foreground is too blurry for me. --Ivar (talk) 18:28, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with Ivar, the first frame is really blurry, you should crop it. Some of the other frames are not great, but still acceptable to me given the image resolution Poco a poco (talk) 20:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks a little overexposed to me. Especially to be seen on the way in the foreground. I also think the sharpness in the left foreground is unacceptable for an excellent photo. (Compare the sharpness in the middle and right) Je-str (talk) 21:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Even after looking three times on three different displays, I cannot find an overexposed area on the way in the foreground. --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Bonsecours Market 324.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 20:22:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 20:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very soft (due to f/18 I suppose) and noisy, and the tone mapping applied (I guess) looks very unreal. --Kreuzschnabel 09:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment From the lights I guess this is an (early) blue hour shot. Wouldn’t it look better (and more realistic) if it was darker? Maybe also the somewhat soft sharpness is partially due to too much brightening. --Aristeas (talk) 11:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Wilfredor: Just to avoid misunderstandings: My comment was not intended as a rejection, but as a suggestion for improvement. Could you try to make the shadows (and maybe also the midtones) darker? Maybe then some of us will change their vote ;–). And even if that does not happen, the image itself may be better – IMHO your photo definitely is worth the extra work. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 17:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty, but I agree with Aristeas that it looks too light, as if the shadows have been lifted too much. Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like all the bright lights. But even without this problem I don't find this view interesting. --Dinkum (talk) 13:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Dinkum, not a compelling view Eve Teschlemacher (talk) 22:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Kreuz, Aristeas, Cmao20 , Dinkum and Eve Teschlemacher, I just uploaded another version without tonemapping, thanks for your reviews. And btw Aristeas my goal is not to get more FP, is more improve my skills, thanks and i love your review. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
It’s a different picture now. Minor fixes during voting period are acceptable, but in this case I encourage you to withdraw this nomination and place a fresh one for the second version. We cannot mix up votings on different images within the same nomination. --Kreuzschnabel 06:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I think this is a pretty good picture and has a nice mood, but I agree with Eve that it's not a compelling view. In other words, good but not great, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Plage de l'Horloge.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 19:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Canada
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 19:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Could be sharper, but a very large file, still good at 300% of the 13-inch laptop's screen, with a nice composition and mood. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:28, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing is sharp (again, why f/18?), too much noise, distracting foreground object (stairs?), and I can’t see any clear composition nor subject here. What’s the monument – the beach, the bridge, the buildings? --Kreuzschnabel 09:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Like Ikan, I think sharpness is OK given the file size, and I actually like composition and mood. --Aristeas (talk) 10:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Are we talking about the same image? ;) 23.8 megapixels is really not that outstanding – here is a large size image where sharpness down to pixel level is not required. Even downscaled to 50 percent (i.e. 6 megapixels), this here candidate is still not sharp. f/18 on a DX size sensor is an odd decision if you want a sharp image, due to aperture diffraction growing along the pixel density. --Kreuzschnabel 22:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I completely agree with you that f/18 is not a good choice, especially on an APS-C camera (I would have used f/8 to f/11 on a “full-frame” camera). --Aristeas (talk) 08:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 11:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty noisy for ISO 100 and I also wonder why f/18. I do expect more sharpness for FP Poco a poco (talk) 20:33, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Kreuz and Poco a poco, please, take a look, I applied a selective denoise and selective sharpening. f/18 because I was looking to keep the beach and the bridge in the same plane. Thanks in advance for your reviews --Wilfredor (talk) 00:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Sharpness is a bit better now but you cannot regain details lost in exposure by subsequent sharpening. The water surface has not been done a favour by sharpening, and I’m still not sold on the composition. If the bridge is the main subject (as I understand), it’s way too distant and too little visible of it. --Kreuzschnabel 06:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The Bridge is only a element in the composition, the title is Beach Horloge (in french). --Wilfredor (talk) 07:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Composition mildly interesting but lighting isn't great, plus concrete steps at bottom are distracting. Eve Teschlemacher (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Artifacts on water. Sorry for not seeing those at first, but they've really bothered me since I saw them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Version without the concrete steps at bottom

SHORT DESCRIPTION

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Because Eve Teschlemacher recomendation --Wilfredor (talk) 07:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Less is more :) this is much clearer. However Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose there are sharpening artifacts now all over the frame (foreground sand as well as the background bridge) and the cloning is poorly done (i.e. with visible traces), no this is not at all an FP to me for technical drawbacks. --Kreuzschnabel 10:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - Great improvement, much more relaxing to look at, but I'm sorry, I have to pull my vote from the other version and hold off here until it's clarified whether I'm looking at just wind or disturbing noise in the water. I'm talking about the small lines. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment How could this be wind? It’s on the umbrellas and in the sand as well. It’s sharpening artifacts – this image is hopelessly oversharpened in trying to save some detail from the unsharp shot at stopped-down aperture. --Kreuzschnabel 10:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
I come from fix the excesive oversharpening and artifacts in the water, please, take a look --Wilfredor (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Wilfredor: Just as a hint: As far as I can see, the fix was applied to the first (uncropped) version, but not to this cropped one; it should be fixed, too. --Aristeas (talk) 08:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Sorry, the water still looks unacceptable to me. -- 08:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ikan Kekek (talk • contribs) --Aristeas (talk) 08:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

File:Santa Maria della Carità organo Brescia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 14:29:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pipe organ by Giovanni Tonoli in the Santa Maria della Carità church in Brescia.

File:Schwetzingen - Schlossgarten - Moschee - Ansicht über den Moscheeweiher im Herbst 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 13:30:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Autumn view of the Red mosque in the gardens of Schwetzingen Palace, Germany.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Another shot by Aristeas. This is a really interesting one; it depicts the so-called Red Mosque, in Schwetzingen Palace, Germany. Strange as it sounds, it was never actually a working mosque; instead it was aimed to show Europe's newfound Enlightenment tolerance to other religious traditions. Created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thank you very much for nominating! --Aristeas (talk) 13:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The Red Mosque was build by Nicolas de Pigage as a part of the baroque park ensemble. In this photograph, I wanted to show the beautiful view or scene of the mosque together with its reflection in the pond and the old trees; I consider this as the view intended by de Pigage. It is not possible to show the complete mosque from this point of view, because always one part or another is covered by the trees; but I am sure this was considered by de Pigage, too.
    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristeas (talk • contribs) Cart (talk) 14:01, 19 November 2019 (UTC) (UTC)
  • A lot of trees can grow up in 200+ years, and parks change. Have you seen the original plans for the park? --Cart (talk) 14:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • You’re right that I was hasty in my statement. I want to apologize for that and have crossed out that part of the sentence. It would certainly be better to say that, given the care with which gardens were planned at the time, I think it is probable that the later growth of the trees was already being considered at that time. But in any case, this is the present state, and I wanted to document it with the photo. --Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:00, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Nice view, but the ugly bench spoils all for me. I wonder if you had the possibility to move it aside before taking the picture. --A.Savin 15:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I did not have the possibility -- these benches are quite heavy (I have once tried to move another one ;–). Therefore I decided to integrate it as foreground element. --Aristeas (talk) 16:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the bench, it's a nice counterpoint --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 16:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Very peaceful, beautiful reflection of the mosque, nice fall foliage, and the simple white bench is nice, in my opinion, certainly not ugly. What its presence in the photo also does is to help the viewer imagine him-/herself sitting there and viewing the scene (though from a somewhat different vantage point). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ermell (talk) 21:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very fine!--Isiwal (talk) 22:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 05:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I want to sit on this bench :-) Basile Morin (talk) 15:05, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:11, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 23:22, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Axel (talk) 23:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Dinkum (talk) 11:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Tomb of Safdarjung in Delhi.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 10:26:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tomb of Safdarjung
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#India
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dey.sandip - uploaded by Dey.sandip - nominated by Dey.sandip -- Dey.sandip (talk) 10:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 10:26, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The sarcophagus isn't sharp enough, imo.--Peulle (talk) 10:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Well, I guess its subjective — Dey.sandip (talk) 12:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think the crop/perspective in WLM winner 2012 was better. Yours is too wide-angle, making the sarcophagus too small in the frame, which isn't the scale/perspective that seems appropriate for such a tomb. Most of the outer quarter of the image is not adding anything much. -- Colin (talk) 13:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Colin. A sharp version of the composition he links would probably be a worthy of an FP designation, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Old Gas Station Hamburg Grindel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 08:27:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Gas Station
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#German
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Capecross - nominated by Ivar (talk) 08:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 09:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Striking and really different from the usual submission here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Claus 09:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 10:39, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan, interesting and unusual work. Cmao20 (talk) 13:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Remembers me an aquarium --Llez (talk) 05:33, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment (You mean it reminds you of an aquarium. Human beings and animals can remember; things don't remember you.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:28, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the correction. That's what I wanted to say. --Llez (talk) 10:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Palau de la Música Catalana-Palace of Catalan Music (Image 2).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 08:20:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Palace of Catalan Music, in Barcelona

File:Libellulidae Brachythemis contaminata on Nelumbo nucifera leaf with water drops, in a pond.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 00:50:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Libellulidae Brachythemis contaminata on Nelumbo nucifera leaf with water drops, in a pond
  • Thanks for the tip. I've added a link in the description -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hockei (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Different. Only the light could have been a bit softer but let's not be too picky. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:34, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Catedral de Salzburgo, Salzburgo, Austria, 2019-05-19, DD 30-32 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2019 at 19:54:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Central dome of Salzburg Cathedral, Austria.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Central dome of Salzburg Cathedral, Austria. The cathedral was founded in 774 and rebuilt in 1181 after a fire but it become its present Baroque style appearance under Prince-Bishop Wolf Dietrich von Raitenau in the 17th century. Note: there is already one FP of this subject. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Deserving, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Great, and I prefer the wider view, but I don't see why we need two FPs of an identical subject. Maybe if they were from a different angle or under different lighting, then yes, but given that this is basically a wider view focussing on the same place as the other FP, I don't think both should be featured. Honestly I'd support a delist and replace more than I would this. Cmao20 (talk) 22:51, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support because my vote is the seventh support so far and I couldn't bear not to see this promoted. I still think it's too similar, but it is also better than the existing FPs. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:38, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20. I'll support, if the other is delisted. --Ivar (talk) 08:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Technically perfect, but for me it looks just like a wider crop of this FP --Isiwal (talk) 10:48, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I have to confess that I love both views and can’t even decide which one I like better ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 14:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 05:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:20, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Kākāpō head.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2019 at 17:29:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Juvenile kākāpō on Anchor Island in Dusky Sound, New Zealand
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Order_:_Psittaciformes_(Parrots)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Juvenile kākāpō on Anchor Island in Dusky Sound, New Zealand. The kakapo is critically endangered; the total known adult population is 213 living individuals, all of which are named. Most kakapo are kept on two predator-free islands, Codfish / Whenua Hou and Anchor, where they are closely monitored. Created by Kimberley Collins - uploaded by FunkMonk - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good detailed pic of an endangered species. Cmao20 (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition does not work for me at all, the crop is too tight. Very noisy. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition, kakalo head should be seen in whole. -- Karelj (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Uoaei1 Poco a poco (talk) 20:20, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the head should be pictured as a whole. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think that the photo is good enough for FP even though it's such a rare species. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The focal point enhances the bird's expression, and gives a feel of texture to the feathers, and detail to the eye, beak and nares. These are features we don't normally see with such close-up detail, especially for rare and endangered species. Good job!! Atsme Talk 📧 17:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Gipfelkreuz Großer Weitschartenkopf.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2019 at 12:57:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Summit of Großer Weitschartenkopf
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Austria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Simple summit cross on the Großer Weitschartenkopf. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 12:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Milseburg (talk) 12:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 13:39, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:48, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - well done with good descriptive notes. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Isiwal (talk) 17:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great work. The excellent composition of this one is, for me, what was missing from your last candidate, but it's definitely here. Cmao20 (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The background is not very sharp and the colours rather dull. No WOW for me--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 05:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I have to agree with Moroder here. Not much more wow than in any summit shot, background too hazy. Since the main subject is actually the cross (according to file name), this is not an outstanding picture of it IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 09:33, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I've lived with this photo for a while, and my feeling, ultimately, is that the composition works. The haze in the distance is no problem, IMO, and the bank of bright white clouds on the left side beyond the hazy, distant mountains helps. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Moroder. —kallerna (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support An excellent focus to main object and the haze in the distance is natural --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:20, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:St. Michael ob Rauchenödt Flügelaltar Werktagsseite 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2019 at 08:09:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winged altar St. Michael ob Rauchenödt

File:Sympetrum sanguineum - Leucate 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2019 at 21:38:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sympetrum sanguineum (Ruddy darter), female; Cap Leucate