Commons:Kandidater till utvalda bilder

Kandidater till utvalda bilder på andra språk:

Det här är kandidater till att bli utvalda bilder.

För ett arkiv av tidigare nominerade se: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

Det finns också en kronologisk lista av utvalda bilder.

Nominering[edit]

Om du tror att du har funnit eller skapat en bild som kan anses värdefull, lägg till den här nedan i sektionen för nomineringar, högst upp i listan, med hjälp av den här länken (Hjälp). För det behöver du inte ha en inloggning, även anonyma användare får nominera.

Men innan du nominerar, kolla upp så att bilden har lämplig bildbeskrivning och licens.

Omröstningsregler[edit]

Röstningen pågår i 9 dagar. På den 10:e dagen blir resultatet fastställt.
Om en bild efter 5 dagar inte fått någon mer positiv röst än från den som nominerade, så kan kandidaten tas bort ifrån sidan.
Nomineringar ifrån oinloggade bidragsgivare är välkomna
Bidrag ifrån oinloggade bidragsgivare till diskussionen är välkomna
Röstning från oinloggade bidragsgivare räknas inte
En nominering räknas inte som en röst, men den som nominerar får rösta

Den som nominerar en bild kan när som helst ta bort bilden ifrån omröstningen

En kandidat kommer att bli en utvald bild om följande krav uppfylls:

Lämplig licens (så klart)
Minst 5 stödjande röster
Förhållande mellan stödjande/motsättande röster på minst 2/1 (minst två tredjedels majoritet)
Två olika versioner av samma bild kan inte båda bli utvalda; endast den med högst antal stödjande röster blir utvald.

Röstning kan göras med "{{Support}}" (stöd) eller "{{Oppose}}" (ej stöd), neutralitet kan anges med "{{Neutral}}".

Kandidater[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 42.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2014 at 19:33:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Waterfall over the Basaltic Prisms of Santa María Regla, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, Mexico. All by me, Poc o² 19:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Poc o² 19:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support WOW! ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 20:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Neak Pean, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-17, DD 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2014 at 19:19:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Way over a pond to reach the Khmer temple of Neak Pean, an artificial island that belongs to the Angkor temple complex, located today in Cambodia. The buddhist temple Neak Pean, part of the temple Preah Khan was erected by order of Jayavarman VII in the 12th century. All by me, Poc o² 19:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Poc o² 19:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Araujojoan96 (talk) 19:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Mukdenia Rossii 03.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2014 at 18:22:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Small flowers of Mukdenia Rossii. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Panorama of Vologda Kremlin.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2014 at 18:16:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded by Alexey Yuzhakov. Nominated by PetarM -- Mile (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Nice panorama of Vologda. Cold tones in cold weather in cold city. A bit artsy sky but I like it. -- Mile (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Araujojoan96 (talk) 19:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Peter-Gabriel-2011.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2014 at 16:52:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peter Gabriel performing at the 2011 Skoll Awards.

Info created by Skoll World Forum - uploaded by Araujojoan96 - nominated by Araujojoan96 -- Araujojoan96 (talk) 16:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Support -- Araujojoan96 (talk) 16:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose --- One of my favourite artists, but this is not an exceptional potrait of him. The background is distracting and the lighting a bit harsh. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment What do you think about the lighting of these portraits of him 1 2? Are better than this? --Araujojoan96 (talk) 18:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
  - Comment I removed the background, you were right! It´s more brilliant in this way... --Araujojoan96 (talk) 19:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Maria Tudor1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2014 at 13:59:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Antonis Mor - uploaded by Lostresjovenes - nominated by The Herald -- Herald talk with me 13:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Herald talk with me 13:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Araujojoan96 (talk) 16:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 21:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Lagoon Nebula by ESO[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2014 at 00:47:28 (UTC)

This new infrared view of the star formation region Messier 8, often called the Lagoon Nebula, was captured by the VISTA telescope at ESO’s Paranal Observatory in Chile. User:Stas1995
The VLT Survey Telescope (VST) at ESO's Paranal Observatory in Chile has captured this richly detailed new image of the Lagoon Nebula. User:Jmencisom
Gas and dust condense, beginning the process of creating new stars in this image of Messier 8, also known as the Lagoon Nebula. User:EricHS211

Info created by ESO - uploaded by users - nominated by ArionEstar -- ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 00:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 00:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Tokyo Midtown Akasaka.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2014 at 00:13:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by JordyMeow - uploaded by JordyMeow - nominated by JordyMeow -- Jordy Meow (talk) 00:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Jordy Meow (talk) 00:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Widok na Perast od strony morza 05.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2014 at 22:59:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Halavar -- Halavar (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Halavar (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Stunning location and nice composition with some interesting leading lines. However, I think the point of critical focus is on the boat not the landscape, which causes the village and mountains to be rather soft. The village shows sign of some blown highlights. I am also seeing an unusual texture pattern in the sky, which is most notable when the image scales in the browser. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Choloepus hoffmanni (Puerto Viejo, CR) crop.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2014 at 19:18:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Geoff Gallice - uploaded by WolfmanSF - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 19:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -Kikos (talk) 07:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Araujojoan96 (talk) 16:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Independence of Brazil 1888.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2014 at 00:31:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pedro Américo - uploaded by Lecen - nominated by ArionEstar -- ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 00:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support For me it is the best framework of the history of Brazil, although not is quite match with the reality in the time. -- ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 00:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 17:12, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Halavar (talk) 23:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Jordy Meow (talk) 00:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Rideau Canal Skateway Ottawa - 2.jpeg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2014 at 08:34:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Rideau Canal Skateway, Ottawa, Canada. Imo a very nice vierw of both the skateway and surrounding city. Created and uploaded by Saffron Blaze. Nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 08:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 08:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose -- Dadaszehon (talk) User has less than 50 edits. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:33, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Nice and interesting subject, taken with good quality. The picture makes me read the article, so it done it´s job pretty good. ;-) But sadly imo not outstanding enough for FP. The thing is I can`t even tell what I´m missing cause like Arild already wrote it is "...a very nice view of both the skateway and surrounding city". Sorry! --mathias K 16:10, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Helags Mars 2013.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2014 at 07:39:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Panorama of Mount Helags. The highest mountain in Sweden south of the Arctic Circle. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 07:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Very sharp and lovely - Is it possible that WB is just a tad bit blue? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. I uploaded a new version with a small correction. Did you think it was enough?--ArildV (talk) 09:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support —Blurred Lines 12:37, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Ximonic (talk) 13:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Strong support Fantastic sharpness and snow detail!!! Great composition as well!! --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Halavar (talk) 10:03, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Tamba52 (talk) 08:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Lido de Thau, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2014 at 06:31:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The "Lido de Thau" an area protected by the Conservatoire du littoral along the Étang de Thau. In background a part of the town of Sète, Hérault, France. Image taken a few days after and not far from this image but in the other direction. All by me. --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Great lighting and composition. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support per King of Hearts. —Blurred Lines 12:38, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --ArildV (talk) 13:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I don't see how this meets the standard at Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural. I'm not going wow and the sky looks smoggy rather than attractive. -- Colin (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but per Colin. --mathias K 16:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Per KoH. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 18:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Tu corriges le dust spot dans le ciel, et je supporte !--Jebulon (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Done Thanks, I had seen it before before to go to job but after having returned I forgot... --Christian Ferrer 06:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Bad lighting and per Colin. -Kikos (talk) 07:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support, Per King of Hearts. --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 14:12, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Scorpions - 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2014 at 22:48:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Paweł Mąciwoda, bassist of German rock band Scorpions, in Madrid in 2014. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 22:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 22:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 23:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support minor technical flaws but very atmospheric! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Halavar (talk) 10:03, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --ArildV (talk) 19:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Katie Green, Nikon Solutions Expo, 2008 (crop).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2014 at 12:41:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Keraunoscopia - nominated by Blurred Lines -- —Blurred Lines 12:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- —Blurred Lines 12:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Very nice subject, but rather low quality. The sharpness around the eyes is pretty soft and very strong CA´s all over the bling-bling. --mathias K 13:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Shun Lee Crisco edit.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2014 at 12:33:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Base64 and uploaded by Crisco 1492 - nominated by Blurred Lines -- —Blurred Lines 12:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- —Blurred Lines 12:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support as editor of the image. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Weak support for the good view, composition and quality but still I miss something special here Poc o² 19:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support per Poco. --mathias K 21:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support I miss something too, but pleasant quality-- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Nice to see a high quality shot of something modern. Well executed imo. --DXR (talk) 08:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Also per Diego - which is kind of funny, as we're all missing "something special" and yet do give our support. On the other side, maybe that's the special element here, the absence of anything aesthetically pleasing as key subject. This ugly monstrosity of a building is almost dehumanizingly intimidating, especially considering the friendly evening atmosphere and lighting. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:25, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Wow great comment! -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Per Martin.--ArildV (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Ricardo Esteban Gutierrez (talk) 16:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose per supporters (!!!) = nothing special.--Jebulon (talk) 21:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Heißluftballon am Sihlsee2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2014 at 08:37:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 08:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 08:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Nice picture with good quality. Perfect QI for me, but I´m missing something special for FP. --mathias K 09:58, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Don't see anything remarkable either photographically or in the subject. -- Colin (talk) 12:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

You have found apparently a new hobby? Giving the same cursorily argument on all my nomination. So it looks.--Wladyslaw (talk) 22:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

It goes to the heart of why this not FP. It is a perfectly ordinary photo of a perfectly ordinary balloon, with no apparent attempt at artistic composition or spectacular technical achievement. In contrast, King of Hearts, I don't think "I think it is quite good" is a satisfactory reason to support an image that is supposed to be among our finest works -- have you looked at the category for balloons? -- Colin (talk) 10:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Support I think it is quite good. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Per KoH. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose QI, but nothing outstanding here. --Ivar (talk) 16:37, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Wlady, your other balloon image at least has context. This is just a balloon. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Question It is almost perfect technically. I would definitely support if the resolution is higher and the sharpness increased. Any chance? --Jordy Meow (talk) 00:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Higher Resolution? My camera has 16 MP and this image was not downsized, so no chance to get a higher resolution. But I wonder anyways what is the effort increasing the resolution? You want to make a ultra poster out of it? This picture was not sharpend in addition, IMO it's sharp enough. But I could for sure sharpen the image a bit. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Why would increasing the resolution/sharpness make this more interesting? Remember this is supposed to be the "finest" on Commons, so a look at the category is a good idea. This is complicated by the fact that someone has over-categorised as is a frequent problem on Commons. But still, we have thousands of balloon photographs and many are equal to this in technical quality and lots are superior in terms of subject (not least, as Saffron points out, the other balloon picture by Wladyslaw). -- Colin (talk) 08:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:1930s Japan Travel Poster - 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2014 at 22:36:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by (Japanese government railways) - uploaded by Anonimski - nominated by Anonimski -- Anonimski (talk) 22:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Anonimski (talk) 22:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Jordy Meow (talk) 00:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Io diagram.svg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2014 at 22:30:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Jupiter's moon Io! all by Kelvinsong—Love, Kelvinsong talk 22:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 22:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 06:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support —Blurred Lines 12:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Kelvinsong: Nice, but would be good a Set with all diagrams, no!? ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 23:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Ughh half the people here want set noms & half of them don'tt.. Anyway there's no Callisto diagram so a set nomination doesn't really make sense—Love, Kelvinsong talk 01:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support great, as always --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:58, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Halavar (talk) 10:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Ricardo Esteban Gutierrez (talk) 16:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Herald talk with me 14:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --CyberXRef^☎ 21:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:La Grotta di Byron.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2014 at 20:00:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Andrea - uploaded by Tm - nominated by Pottercomuneo -- Pottercomuneo (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Pottercomuneo (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Typical HDR problems: Clear sky haloes around mountains, a bit oversaturated. Also small and not very strong in details. --DXR (talk) 21:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Very nice. HDR problems aren't really that noticeable. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:16, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Very nice view indeed, but the HDR problems, mentioned by DXR, are too visible for me. btw, whats the pink spot on the upper right side? --mathias K 10:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment the pink spot is a flower, I suppose. --Pottercomuneo (talk) 16:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose This sure is a great photograph! The issue I have is that its appearance isn't very natural, and therefore its encyclopedic value seems rather limited to me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Martin above that this is a great photograph. The only flaw, unfortunately, is oversaturation. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Per HDR issues. Daniel Case (talk) 01:49, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Looks unnatural especially the sky (HDR). Looks slightly tilted. Original photo with appropriate post-processing could be FP. Jordy Meow (talk) 00:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Lörrach-Hauingen - Haus Steinenstraße6a 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2014 at 19:26:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Don't see anything remarkable either photographically or in the subject. (are those roof tiles plastic?) -- Colin (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Would you have spend a few seconds more you could see that this is a regular residential building, but exceeding small. But I never had seen any solid review on my picture by you. Such is life. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

I did notice it was small, but not "exceedingly small". Perhaps, if the subject is remarkable but the photo fails to express that clearly, then that is all the more reason to oppose. -- Colin (talk) 08:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

the photo fails to express that clearly because? I see a house and a lamp in the background to give a idea of the dimensions. If this point should really be your reason to oppose (but I question this) than it is easy to disprove.--Wladyslaw (talk) 08:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

The house in the background is four stories tall, so of course it is larger. And a street lamp at similar height to a second floor window is not unusual. -- Colin (talk) 09:47, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Please show me just one example of a house with just 1 story, an area like an garage and straightly above a attic floor with double pitch roof. I never had seen that before. --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

You mean a one-bedroom bungalow? Have you seen the size of starter-homes in the UK? And this is wider and deeper than any single garage in the UK. Small houses are not unusual, but typically they are old and quaint, rather than modern and plastic. -- Colin (talk) 11:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

(1) You aren't able to show me such a house. (2) This house is not in UK but in Germany and such houses are very unusual for middle Europe. This one is a cultural heritage monument for your information. --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Oppose per Colin, QI but not featured for me. --mathias K 10:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support good -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:35, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Nice. -- -donald- (talk) 07:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose a nice and good QI, but not more for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Lámparas, Djemaa el Fna -- 2014 -- Marrakech, Marruecos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2014 at 21:03:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded & nominated by Alurín -- Alurín (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Alurín (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Top left corner a bit distracting --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support... but not enough not to support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:49, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support This is ordinarily the sort of thing I'd complain about as too cluttered, but the light gives it something magical here. Something magical enough that I'm not at all distracted by that corner—in fact I barely noticed there might be something distracting there. This would make a nice desktop image. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Nice lighting and composition. Kleuske (talk) 11:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support —Blurred Lines 12:13, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Weak support original and acceptable quality, but the crop everywhere is tricky Poc o² 19:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 23:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Magical, yes. Parabolooidal (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 18:00, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Halavar (talk) 10:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Sickla Strand October 2013 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2014 at 19:19:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by ArildV - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 19:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Beautiful reflection. Halavar (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Joydeep _Talk 09:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Good reflection and colours. But it is still a brick (former) office block and those buildings on the right with scaffolding and plastic sheeting aren't attractive. Not really working for me. Sorry. -- Colin (talk) 19:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:16, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Support —Blurred Lines 12:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Colin, I don't see anything featurable here. Quality is, as usual, top but I apart from the reflexion the buildings in the picture don't say much to me, sorry Arild, Poc o² 19:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose It is just a reflection. I cannot determine which is the subject. If it is trying to show the building, then the trees and the reflection get in its way. If it is trying to show the water and the trees then the building is awfully disturbing. IMHO. Barcex (talk) 20:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for nomination. I like this photo. Some environments are complex. This lake is located very close to the city center (In the background is en:Folksamhuset). The south shore (where I was standing when I took the picture) is a nature reserve. The northern section covers different eras, the trees on the north side is planted and belonged to a former estate. Around the year 1900 industry expanded in the area and Atlas Copco built a huge industrial area. The company dominated the area during most of the 1900s and also built the brick house. In the late 1900s, the industry move further out from the city and the new houses were built. I think (besides the wonderful autumn and the reflections in the water) that the environment is interesting with contrasts between nature and the growing and changing city. I added a geocode to show the location better. Thanks for comment and votes.--ArildV (talk) 08:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Jean Henri Marlet Das berühmte Schachspiel zwischen Howard Staunton und Pierre Charles Fourrier Saint-Amant 1843.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2014 at 22:29:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jean Henry Marlet - uploaded by WolfD59 - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 22:29, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 22:29, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment The EV is there but is the wow? I think this may be better suited to en:FP nomination. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File:View on SR 98 Arizona.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2014 at 16:23:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment if an horisontaalne line is inclined in a picture, it better be inclined a lot. Otherwise it just isn't effective. Centered composition is also not the best solution in most cases. --195.69.53.244 18:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment —Not sure if it's tilted or if it's actually just the terrain but nice picture and while unsharp at 100%, image size more than makes up for it—Love, Kelvinsong talk 22:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment The bottom is extremely unsharp. Consider cropping it out (and possibly cropping out a corresponding area from the top to rebalance the horizon). --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Done Cropped top and bottom, resized. Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Pretty unsharp, tilt. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Don't like the crop or the lighting. -- Colin (talk) 12:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment I do love that sky and the subject's relation to it, but can't get past the other issues people are raising. Do you have other versions perhaps taken from a more level place or from a higher vantage point? Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Strong tilt (the sky transition rules out a slope that strong). Background oversharpened, foreground blurry. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 11:06, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I've never been puzzled so much from reviews of my images --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Unbalanced, tilted. I can see more beautiful photos coming from this exact same scene and conditions. Did you take more by any chance? -- Jordy Meow (talk) 00:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Aegithalos caudatus front-on 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2014 at 16:11:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info This is a similar picture to one I nominated a month ago (in fact, of the same bird), but which didn't make FP here. I went back and reviewed the shots from the day, and I think this one has a better pose than the other nomination (I liked the slightly cocked head here - I think it makes it looks more "connected" to the viewer). I've also re-cropped to give a better, less cramped composition, imo. I can understand, however, if the front-on view is not to everyone's taste. All by Baresi franco -- Baresi franco (talk) 16:11, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Baresi franco (talk) 16:11, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Technically excellent, nice framing, wonderful pose, well-lit and colourful image... and very cute. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support —Blurred Lines 17:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Poc o² 21:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Alurín (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry Baresi. No front-ons for me. And the background is awfully unnatural. Note the italics. Pavements (one of many OK unnatural elements) are fine with me. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 06:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Again, very good work! Maybe a tad oversharpend but still OK for me. --mathias K 07:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support per Saffron Blaze. Nikhil (talk) 09:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Great image! Halavar (talk) 12:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Joydeep _Talk 09:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Strange (and unnatural?) backgroundcolor. WLMBP (talk) 17:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Info It's a brick wall. --Baresi franco (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Support --JLPC (talk) 22:33, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Ricardo Esteban Gutierrez (talk) 16:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality, but the brick wall is unattractive and distracting. Sorry. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 19:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Tamba52 (talk) 08:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Schonbrunn Palace - Vienna.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2014 at 13:36:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- MrPanyGoff 13:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- MrPanyGoff 13:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose There is a notable lighting/brightness difference between the left and right halves of the image. It gives the impression this was two images stitched at the middle. Not convinced this particular building rises to the level of wow either given its rather mundane surroundings. I do like the lone indivual walking across the front. Nice scale reference. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Comment The difference in the light is because of a shade just thrown by some clouds on some parts of the ground and the building. A couple of minutes later the whole building was overshadowed. Isn't that actually a plus to catch the moment of changing the lighting conditions?--MrPanyGoff 22:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Support —Blurred Lines 17:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Poc o² 21:11, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:29, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --XRay ^talk 09:40, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Saffron that the lighting changes from left to right. The horizontal along the base of the building is distorted so the stitching hasn't worked as well as it might. Rather low resolution for a stitched image. I like the plainness of the building/garden. -- Colin (talk) 12:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
weak Oppose In my opinion, this image needs more space around the main object. Kruusamägi (talk) 21:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Kamal Bahamdan & Noblesse Des Tess - 2013 Longines Global Champions Tour.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2014 at 12:46:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by inisheer - nominated by Pleclown -- Pleclown (talk) 12:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support I really like this picture, the horse looks like its hovering over the fence. The oxer's, the horse's and the rider's coat colors are contrasting with the sand. A little bit of background: This picture was taken in Lausanne, during the swiss event of the 2013 Longines Global Champions Tour, which was attended by three accredited photographers, thanks to Wikimedia CH. The rider is, a Saudi Arabian, and the horse is Noblesse des Tess, a 13 years old mare. This couple has finished in 4th place at the -- Pleclown (talk) 12:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support I like it. Dynamic composition and high quality with good focus.--ArildV (talk) 12:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support per ArildV. —Blurred Lines 13:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support This is a really good one! --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment bird's eye view is not the best angle to capture this scene. worm's eye view would be better. Otherwise an excellent motive. --195.69.53.244 18:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

In an international competition, photgraphers are not allowed to wander where they want. There are allocated spots. Pleclown (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment CAs on the left -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

New version uploaded. Pleclown (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support although I'd reduce noise a bit Poc o² 21:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but there is a reason why the pro's use another viewpoint (though a shame we can't). Not seeing the rider's eyes fails it for me. -- Colin (talk) 11:58, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

I don't understand your bit about pros. We were with others photographers, "as if" we were from the press. it's the meaning of "accredited". We had access to the same spots than the professionals. but, as you can see in the category, being "on the ground" poses other problems, the first being the public and everything in the background. it's, in my opinion, one of the interests of this picture, the spotless background. 90.84.146.197 12:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC) ps: I'm on my phone, I can't ad links, sorry.

I misunderstood your comment about restrictions. But it is common in events for pros to have positions that the public can't use. And lenses the public can't afford. -- Colin (talk) 14:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

We were having access to positions that the public can't use. See the white person in the right top corner in File:2013 Longines Global Champions - Lausanne - 14-09-2013 - Gerco Schröder et New Orleans.jpg ? That's the photographer of this picture, at another time of the day, in the same spot that this photo.

Regarding the lense, it's taken with a 80-200mm f2.8 Minolta mounted on a Sony Alpha 900, a 3000€ euro combination, not really everybody's equipment. Pleclown (talk) 17:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

I think you are focusing on aspects of my comment that aren't relevant to the oppose. The viewpoint doesn't make the jump as dynamic as it could be, and not seeing the eyes of a subject is problematic. -- Colin (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Support Halavar (talk) 11:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support OK, there are flaws. But the motive seems exceptional to me. And one can see the eyes of the subject very well, as the subjects is, of course, the horse...--Jebulon (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Newborn bat (Cynopterus brachyotis).JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2014 at 07:00:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by -- Anton^Talk 07:00, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Anton^Talk 07:00, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Support - Though the bright background is a bit distracting, IMHO, this is great work. Nikhil (talk) 09:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose the background is too distracting for me. Tomer T (talk) 09:32, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Question @Tomer T: How is a white background distracting to you? Just curious. —Blurred Lines 13:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
  - It looks unnatural. Tomer T (talk) 15:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support but I also have some concerns regarding the background, it looks so empty and sterile --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like the lighting. Background is overly bright but this isn't high key work, perhaps as a result of the flash. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Per Saffron Blaze --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Per others --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:21, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Harsh flash. -- Colin (talk) 11:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose per above. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 19:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Sète, Hérault 09.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2014 at 18:44:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A trail and "cairels" (french local name for the little walls in ruins on the right of the image) along the Étang de Thau. The place is named "Lido de Thau" and is protected by the Conservatoire du littoral. All by me. --Christian Ferrer 18:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Christian Ferrer 18:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Support —Blurred Lines 19:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, this is a very nice picture but not much more for me. I don`t think this is one of the best pictures commons has to offer. By the way, it looks way to oversharpend in some areas (the water on the right side for example). --mathias K 05:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

mathias, thanks for your rewiew and for your explanations but I want to specify that the aspect of the water is not caused by oversharpening but by a very strong North wind (look at the grass), which causes every times a lot of very small waves and an aspect very wrinkled of the water. --Christian Ferrer 07:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

You can see moreover better these wrinkles at the bottom right with a lot of details! --Christian Ferrer 12:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose No sorry. Picture about nothing. Description about nothing (it is the most common scene in "Sète, Hérault"?!!). Shame! --Kikos (talk) 07:00, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Comment Please try to be kind with your critics! This is not a helpful review! Shame is a totally no-go and a bad insult to the author! --mathias K 07:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

"Shame" does also mean "pity". I hope that was the purpose by Kikos. --A.Savin 10:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Support --DimiTalen 08:37, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose ugly landscape, the photo does not say anything--Pava (talk) 18:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment While I'm not necessarily convinced that this image deserves FP status, I see absolutely no reason why one should a) consider the depicted landscape "ugly", and b) openly insult the photographer... sorry. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:26, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

swap my comments to insults really is not very mature, I express just what I think, and sincerely believe to be quite objective, no fury, no insult. I doubt the photographer to stop taking pictures because of my comments, I doubt that my comments offend the photographer, the most they can push to improve, to change the subject, change cities, change place or not repeating the same actions. If we instead want to comment sterile as "no wow" or only positive comments is another matter. I voted photographs of this photographer in the past, when I liked. --Pava (talk) 22:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

- - Comment I stumbled on the ongoing discussion only after leaving my comment here... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:37, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Thanks all, a famous photographer said (I forgot the name) and I think it was not the only, that a successful photo is a photo which activates a reaction, I thus concludes that my artistic talent is on a good way --Christian Ferrer 21:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with Pava. The scene is ugly and deeply boring. There is no composition or artistry here. Christian, the photo did not "activate a reaction", your nomination did. Hence the photo is not "successful". As someone once said "If you want to be a better photographer, stand in front of more interesting stuff." -- Colin (talk) 12:15, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality but uninteresting composition Poc o² 21:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose No wow, I found the composition being too tight, it is probably due to the choice of a telephoto focal lenght for a landscape. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment This is a nice place and I believe you could take a nice photo at a different time of the day. It could definitely be more wow. -- Jordy Meow (talk) 00:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Bangkok Skyline (MK).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2014 at 17:50:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Panoramic view of Bangkoks hazy skyline. Pictures where taken from the "2nd" floor of the Wat Arun. It is a 14 (upright)picture pano taken at 100mm, hand-halt. ;-) c/u/n by me, mathias K 17:50, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- mathias K 17:50, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
2nd Info I know that the foreground looks a bit random and maybe not everyone likes the resulting actual crop. But there were some roofs in the foreground so I had to crop this for the "hazy-city effect". Just for orientation, the Millenium Hilton Hotel (with the "UFO" on top) right in the middle of the picture is about 5,5 km away. --mathias K 18:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Comment Is the background in focus or is that just the haze? Either way it does detract from a massive pano with lots of detail. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:03, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

I would say the focus fits pretty good. Even those little things like satellite dishes and antennas are visible very well, though through the haze ;-). But anyway I got your point and agree with it. I would also prefer this pano with bright sunshine, a blue sky and all those little details shown clear and "sharp". But with the given circumstances, I like the result pretty much cause this hazy view, with the nearly mising colours has something special in my eyes. --mathias K 05:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Support I like the grey haze. Shame the trees and flags on the ship introduce a bit of distracting colour. -- Colin (talk) 11:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I like the haze but the foreground objects are too distracting and dominant in my opinion. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 16:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Babuchas 02 -- 2014 -- Marrakech, Marruecos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2014 at 15:12:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded & nominated by Alurín -- Alurín (talk) 15:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Alurín (talk) 15:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Support —Blurred Lines 15:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 01:03, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --DimiTalen 08:39, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Not much more than a bunch of ~~stuff~~ kitsch for me, quality image otherwise (nothing personal), I'm sorry --A.Savin 10:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Support The larger (initial) version is IMHO better, but FP for the original composition to me Poc o² 21:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Don't know why it was reduced in resolution. -- Colin (talk) 11:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Done, Colin. --Alurín (talk) 17:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose No wow for me. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose This is closer to what I was discussing earlier with many shoes. It is far better, but still not in the realm of WOW! I am concerned the colours are oversaturated as well. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 22:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Halavar (talk) 10:01, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Nice rythm. Kleuske (talk) 14:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Landschaftspark Duisburg Nord March 2014 4.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2014 at 09:19:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Impression of Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord at blue hour. Taking this picture was quite demanding, considering I was standing in a relatively tiny courtyard surrounded by industrial buidlings. An UWA lense was essential, plus some perspective correction. All the different sources of light made it difficult to correctly adjust the WB. What is more: The red light was kind of flickering, resulting in the impression that the "red tower" is somewhat lacking sharpness, although both objects in front of and behind it are in fact in focus. All by Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but I´m not so happy with the composition and quality. The very wide field of view makes a perspective correction necessary, so far so good. But the result is a little bit too much for my taste. Now it looks like Penrose stairs to me... ;-) --mathias K 10:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 11:15, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Neutral The light there is very challenging (as I know from my own experience). You managed it very well - congrats. The quality of the shot is also very good. The reason for my neutral vote is that the composition is not fully convincing. There are limited photo positions but the building is directed away from the viewer and looks somehow imbalanced. As far as I can remember the atrium where you are standing is very tight and the usage of ultra WW obligatory and the perspective rather extereme. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:46, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you Tuxyso for your friendly and balanced critique - I really appreciate it. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Alternative: File:Landschaftspark Duisburg Nord March 2014 5.JPG[edit]

Info Impression of Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord at blue hour. All by me. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Since composition seems to be an issue above, as mentioned by mathias K and Tuxyso, I'd like to offer this image as an alternative. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Neutral This one is better. Composition looks more pleasing to me, but due to the massive perspective correction it looks still unnatural in my eyes. Especially the green chamber is too much "corrected" for my taste... --mathias K 07:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks, mathias K, for your review! Well, imo perspective correction isn't really radical in this case. My lense plane was almost parallel to the image plane. Cf. some photos without any perspective correction, here, and here. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose—Composition seems worse—the contour of the structure is now fanning out into the edge. It was better when it had the whole two-thirds of the picture to face out towards. Also seems slightly overcompressed & oversharpened—Love, Kelvinsong talk 00:26, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Ta bort utvald-status ifrån bilder[edit]

Efterhand kan standarden för utvalda bilder ändras. Bilder som tidigare var tillräckligt bra, kanske inte längre anses vara det. Här listas bilder som du tycker inte längre förtjänar att vara utvalda bilder. Då behövs 2/3 majoritet (och minst 5 röster) som håller med om att ta bort utvald-statusen ifrån bilden. Om inte 2/3 av de röstande håller med om att ta bort den, så är bilden fortsatt utvald. Här röstar man med {{Keep}} (bilden förtjänar att kvarstå som utvald) or {{Delist}} (bilden förtjänar inte att kvarstå som utvald). När du nominerar en bild här, ta med länken till den ursprungliga utvald-bild-nomineringen (den finns under Länkar på bildens beskrivningssida. Använd den här länken för att lägga till en borttags-kandidat.

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Prismas Basálticos, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 42.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2014 at 19:33:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Waterfall over the Basaltic Prisms of Santa María Regla, Huasca de Ocampo, Hidalgo, Mexico. All by me, Poc o² 19:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Poc o² 19:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Support WOW! ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 20:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)