Commons:Kandidaturen und Anträge

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VOTE
Diese Projektseite in anderen Sprachen:

Diese Seite für Kandidaturen und Anträge bietet einen zentralen Ort um einen Überblick über laufende Kandidaturen und Anträge zu erhalten und um diese zu kommentieren oder sich an Wahlen zu beteiligen. Jeder Benutzer ist zur Kommentierung der Kandidaturen und Anträge eingeladen, jeder angemeldete Benutzer ist berechtigt an Wahlen teilzunehmen.

Wer Rechte beantragen möchte, bei denen keine Wahl vorgeschrieben ist (z.B. Dateiverschieber), der möge bitte Commons:Requests for rights aufsuchen!

Wo und Wie erweiterte Benutzerrechte auf Commons beantragt werden[edit]

Alle dort gestellten Bewerbungen werden automatisch auf dieser Seite eingebunden.

Kommentieren und Abstimmen[edit]

Jeder angemeldete Benutzer ist eingeladen zu wählen und an den Diskussionen zu untenstehenden Kandidaturen und Anträgen teilzunehmen. Stimmen nicht angemeldeter Benutzer werden nicht gezählt, Kommentare dürfen dennoch gemacht werden. Ist eine Wahl erfolgreich so wird ein Bürokrat die beantragten Rechte verleihen. Es liegt im Ermessen des bearbeitenden Bürokraten über den Konsens der Gemeinschaft zu entscheiden, die Entscheidung muss dabei nicht zwangsweise auf der reinen Anzahl der Stimmen basieren. Unter Anderem kann der bearbeitende Bürokrat die Stärke aller dargelegten Argumente und die Erfahrung und das Wissen der kommentierenden Benutzer in seine Entscheidung einbeziehen. Beispielsweise Kommentare und Stimme eines Benutzers mit wenigen oder keinen Bearbeitungen auf Commons können in den Erwägungen des Bürokraten unberücksichtig bleiben.

Es wird darum gebeten sowohl für Ja- (Symbol support vote.svg Support) als auch für Nein-Stimmen (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose) Begründungen anzugeben, da diese dem bearbeitenden Bürokraten bei seiner Entscheidung helfen. Einem Argument, mit Nachweis wenn erforderlich, wird stärkeres Gewicht beigemessen als einer einfachen Abstimmung.

Abstimmung und Kommentierung sind in Englisch gehalten, das soll dich aber nicht von einer Teilnahme an der Wahl abhalten. Schreibe deinen Kommentar notfalls in Deutsch und bitte am Ende des Kommentars um Übersetzung.

Aktualisiere deinen Browsercache und benutze die bei der jeweiligen Kandidatur eingebundenen „Vote“-Links.


Requests for adminship[edit]

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for bureaucratship[edit]

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for CheckUser rights[edit]

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for Oversight rights[edit]

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

  • Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.


Requests for permission to run a bot[edit]

Before making a bot request, please read the new version of the Commons:Bots page. Read Commons:Bots#Information on bots and make sure you have added the required details to the bot's page. A good example can be found here.

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bots/Archive.

Any user may comment on the merits of the request to run a bot. Please give reasons, as that makes it easier for the closing bureaucrat. Read Commons:Bots before commenting.

BartBotje (talk · contribs)[edit]

Operator: Bj.schoenmakers (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Uploading nature related images from plantennamen.info, waarneming.nl waarnemingen.be and observation.org (and other sites in the future in aid of the dutch nature wikiproject Dutch)

Automatic or manually assisted: Automatic when manually initiated

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One time runs at the discretion of the operator

Maximum edit rate (e.g. edits per minute): avg. 10 per minute

Bot flag requested: (Y/N): Y

Programming language(s): Perl using: MediaWiki::Bot and MediaWiki::API

Bj.schoenmakers (talk) 21:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

This bot already has a botflag for the Dutch wikipedia. I want to be able to use it for uploading image batches and as a back-end for a tool i'm creating, allowing users of waarneming.nl, waarnemingen.be and observado.org (sites for nature observations) to publish media to commons using the correct copyright/attribution etc.

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. For plantennamen we have a valid OTRS-ticket (ticket:2017031610007597). Bot owner knows what he is doing and the pics at the sites mentioned are great. Natuur12 (talk) 23:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Please make a few test edits. --Krd 06:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Ok, did a few test-uploads in Category:Images from plantennamen.info
    Please enclose author name in language tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Please make dates complaint with {{ISOdate}} in the {{Information}} template to allow for multilingual dates. Example: |date=Tue Apr 25 01:16:25 2017 changed to |date=2017-04-25 01:16:25~riley (talk) 23:32, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Why doesn't plantennamen have the author's name anywhere? It makes your template statement "This permission only extends to photos taken by Maarten van der Veer at this link." very hard to interpret, because I can't see who any of the photos are by. --99of9 (talk) 02:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
    • There is a slight problem with the ticket. Most likely outcome: we will have too delete the test uploads from plantennamen. I will leave some detailed notes at the ticket in some days too explain what went wrong. Natuur12 (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
      • I nuked the uploads from Plantennamen. It turns out that this person didn't take at least a significant amount of the photographs himself. This was only found out after an extensive check off the test uploads. Most uploads contained consistent EXIF but some didn't. Perhaps we can still hoste some off the files in the future but not this day and given the situation not any day soon. Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
        • Always ask at least one question :). Thanks for investigating Natuur12. --99of9 (talk) 00:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I'd be happy to see test uploads from the other sites. --99of9 (talk) 02:14, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
    • I did some test uploads from waarneming.nl, waarnemingen.be and observations.org :
Natrix natrix (Colubridae) (European Grass Snake), Biebrza NP, Poland.jpg
Alces alces (Cervidae) (Eurasian elk), Biebrza NP, Poland.jpg
Eysarcoris venustissimus (Pentatomidae) (Woundwort Shieldbug) - (imago), Elst (Gld), the Netherlands - 2.jpg
Eysarcoris venustissimus (Pentatomidae) (Woundwort Shieldbug) - (imago), Elst (Gld), the Netherlands.jpg
Harmonia axyridis f. succinea (Coccinellidae) - (imago), Elst (Gld), the Netherlands.jpg
Diurnea fagella (Chimabachidae) - (imago), Elst (Gld), the Netherlands.jpg
Lophophanes cristatus (Paridae) (European Crested Tit) - (adult), Oberengadin, Switzerland.jpg
Pseudoips prasinana (Nolidae) (Green Silver-lines) - (imago), Zemst, Belgium.jpg
Bombylius major (Bombyliidae) (Dark-edged Bee-fly) - (imago), Arnhem, the Netherlands.jpg
Ommatoiulus sabulosus (Julidae) (Striped Millipede), Molenhoek, the Netherlands.jpg

Bj.schoenmakers (talk) 11:12, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

  • The latest upload contains {{LicenseReview}}. Ca we assume that the bot checked the license before the upload, can we consider this reviewed? --Krd 15:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
    @Bj.schoenmakers: ? --Krd 05:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
    • The tool can only be used to upload files with license CC0, BY-SA and BY .. this is checked at upload-time and timestamped using a url-copy at archive.org (since users are allowed to change their copyright/license settings), Bj.schoenmakers (talk) 08:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
      So if this is already checked at upload time, do we need {{LicenseReview}} or can we consider this already reviewed by the bot during upload? --Krd 12:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
      @Bj.schoenmakers: ? --Krd 05:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
      Yes, the copyright/license is checked by the bot during upload, do you want me to remove the {{LicenseReview}} template ? (or is it autopatrolled or something ?) Bj.schoenmakers (talk) 14:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
      Yes, I'd say if it was already reviewed by the bot it does not require additional human review. It should be replaced by the template version which says review is complete. --Krd 17:20, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Requests for comment[edit]

Centralized discussion

Template: View • Discuss  • Edit • Watch