Commons:Kandydatury do grafik na medal

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Prezentacja grafik kandydatów w innych językach:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−

Shortcut: COM:FPC Na tej stronie prezentowani są kandydaci do wyróżnionych grafik (na polskiej Wikipedii "Grafika na medal"). Zwróć uwagę, że nie jest to samo co Grafika dnia, która jest inną forma wyróżnienia.

Aby obejrzeć archiwum poprzednio nominowanych grafik, przejdź na stronę: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.

Istnieje także chronologiczna lista wyróżnionych grafik. Zobacz także: Kandydatów do grafik wysokiej jakości oraz Okiem fotografów.

Formalności[edit]

Nominacja[edit]

Jeżeli uważasz, że znalazłeś/aś zdjęcie lub stworzyłeś/aś grafikę, która może być uważana jako wartościowa, z odpowiednim opisem i licencją, skopiuj nazwę grafiki w to pole (zawierającą prefiks File:), po tym jak tekst będzie już w polu:


Potem musisz ręcznie wprowadzić link do stworzonej strony na górze Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Głosowanie[edit]

Aby wyrazić swoje poparcie, możesz użyć następujących szablonów:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),

lub aby wyrazić swoją dezaprobatę:

  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),

Możesz także użyć:

  • Neutralny: {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • Komentarz: {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • Informacja: {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info).
  • Pytanie: {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question),
  • Prośba: {{Request}} (Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request).

Proszę, postaraj się napisać kilka słów, dlaczego podoba Ci się (lub nie podoba) dane zdjęcie - szczególnie, gdy głosujesz przeciw. Pamiętaj również, aby złożyć swój podpis (~~~~).

Zasady prezentacji grafik kandydatów[edit]

Zasady główne[edit]

  1. Po zakończeniu okresu głosowania wynik będzie ogłoszony 15. dnia po nominacji (tak jak jest to pokazane w tabelce czasowej poniżej). A więc okres głosowania to dwa tygodnie (plus godziny do końca 14. dnia). Głosy dodane 15. dnia i później nie są liczone.
  2. Nominacje zgłaszane przez anonimowych uczestników są mile widziane.
  3. Wkład do dyskusji przez anonimowych uczestników jest również mile widziany.
  4. Głosy oddane przez anonimowych uczestników nie są liczone.
  5. Nominacje nie liczą się jako głosy. Poparcie musi być wyraźnie określone.
  6. Nominowani mogą wycofać swoje nominowane zdjęcia w każdej chwili - pisząc: "I withdraw my nomination" lub dodając tekst {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
  7. Pamiętaj, że celem projektu Wikimedia Commons jest zapewnienie centralnego repozytorium dla grafik używanych przez wszystkie projekty Wikimedia, łącznie z możliwymi przyszłymi projektami. To nie jest po prostu depozyt dla grafik Wikipedii, więc grafiki nie powinny być tutaj oceniane na podstawie ich przydatności dla tego projektu.
  8. Zdjęcia mogą być usuwane z listy, jeżeli nie mają żadnego poparcia (nie licząc nominujących) w 5. dniu (dzień nominacji + 5).
  9. Zdjęcie oznaczone szablonem {{FPX}} może zostać usunięte z listy po 24 godzinach od zastosowania tego znacznika, pod warunkiem że nie ma ono głosów popierających poza nominującym.

Zasady publikacji grafik[edit]

Grafika kandydata zostanie umieszczona, jeżeli będzie spełniać następujące warunki:

  1. Odpowiednia licencja (co jest oczywiste)
  2. Grafika musi mieć przynajmniej 7 głosów poparcia
  3. Podział głosów popierających/przeciwnych musi mieścić się przynajmniej w stosunku 2/1 (większość dwóch - trzecich)
  4. Nie mogą być wybrane dwie różne wersje tej samej grafiki - wybrana zostanie wersja z większą liczbą oddanych głosów.

Zobacz jak postępować ze starymi nominacjami: Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#Co zrobić kiedy głosowanie się zakończy.

Usuwanie zdjęć prezentowanych kandydatów[edit]

Nadgodzinowa zamiana standardów zamieszczonej grafiki. Może się tak zdarzyć, że dla niektórych grafik formalne wystarczająco dobre nie jest już aktualne. To jest dla listy zdjęć, które wierzysz, że nie zasługują dłużej by być prezentowaną grafiką. To wymaga 2/3 głosów większości (i minimum 5 głosów) zgadzających się na usunięcie z listy prezentowanych zdjęć. Jeżeli nie ma 2/3 głosów zgadzających się na usunięcie z listy, nominacja zostaje jako prezentowana grafika. Dla nich głosuj "Zachowaj" Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (to zasługuje by być prezentowaną grafiką) lub "Usuń z listy" Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist (to nie zasługuje by być prezentowaną grafiką). Proszę zapewnij link do oryginalnej FP nominacji (to pojawi się pod Links na stronie opisu grafiki). Inaczej te same zasady jak te powyżej wchodzą w życie. Proszę użyj tego linku this link aby dodać nowego możliwego do usunięcia kandydata.

Wskazówki dla nominujących[edit]

Poniżej możesz znaleźć niektóre ”informacje” na temat zasad, które zdjęcia powinny spełniać:

  • Rozdzielczość – Grafiki zlokalizowane na Commons mogą być używane nie tylko do oglądania na ekranie. Mogą zostać również użyte do drukowania lub oglądania na monitorach o bardzo wysokiej rozdzielczości. Nie możemy także przewidzieć, jakie urządzenia zostaną użyte w przyszłości, a więc ważne jest, aby zdjęcia, które są nominowane, miały tak dużą rozdzielczość jak tylko jest to możliwe. Rozdzielczość powinna być przynajmniej na poziomie 2 mln pikseli (np. 2000x1000), co wydaje się rozsądne na obecną chwilę.
  • Ostrość – każdy ważny przedmiot na grafice powinien być odpowiednio ostry (nie rozmyty).
  • Pierwszy plan i drugi plan – obiekty pierwszoplanowe i drugoplanowe mogą przeszkadzać i odwracać uwagę od głównej zawartości grafiki. Powinieneś/aś sprawdzić czy obiekt z przodu nie zasłania innych ważnych elementów i czy coś na drugim planie nie rozprasza kompozycji (np. gdy światło latarni nie świeci nad czyjąś głową).
  • Głównie Jakość – grafiki nominowane powinny mieć dobrą techniczną jakość.
  • Wartość – naszym głównym celem jest prezentowanie najbardziej wartościowych grafik ze wszystkich dostępnych. Zdjęcia powinny być na swój sposób wyjątkowe, więc bądź tego świadomy/a:
    • prawie wszystkie wschody słońca są ładne i większość takich zdjęć nie jest inna w swojej esencji od innych,
    • zdjęcia nocy są ładne, ale zasadniczo więcej detali można zobaczyć na zdjęciach zrobionych w czasie dnia.
    • piękne nie zawsze musi znaczyć wartościowe.

Nie każda zasada musi być dopasowana, np. grafika może mieć niewielką rozdzielczość, ponieważ wyższa rozdzielczość nie może już być zrobiona (temat zdjęcia już nie żyje lub nie istnieje) lub wydarzenie już nigdy więcej się nie powtórzy.

Wskazówki do oceniania grafik[edit]

Istnieje kilka kryteriów dla oceniania grafik.

Z technicznej strony mamy ekspozycję, kompozycję, kontrolę ruchu i głębokość pola.

  • Ekspozycja odnosi się do zamkniętego diagramu kombinacji, który wykonuje grafikę z stonowaną krzywą, która jest idealnie zdolna do reprezentacji szczegółów cieni i punktów szczytowych w grafice. To nazywamy poziomem. Grafiki mogą być na niskiej stronie stonowanej krzywej (niski zasięg), środkowej (środkowy zasięg) lub wysokiej stronie (wysoki zasięg). Kamery cyfrowe (lub grafiki) mają bardziej skurczony poziom niż film. Brak detalu cienia nie jest koniecznie charakterystyczny dla negatywu. Faktycznie może to być część zaplanowanego efektu. Wypalone szczytowe punkty w dużych częściach rozpraszają element.
  • Kompozycja odnosi się do uzgodnienia elementów w grafice. ”Zasada Trójpodziału” jest dobrą wskazówką dla kompozycji i jest odziedziczona ze szkoły malarstwa. Ideą tą jest rozdzielenie grafiki z dwiema poziomymi i dwiema pionowymi liniami, w ten sposób dzieląc grafikę w trzecie poziomo i pionowo. Centrowanie tematu jest zawsze uważane za złą praktykę. Tematy zainteresowania są zawsze umieszczone w jednym z ‘’punktów zainteresowania’’, gdzie poziome i pionowe linie przecinają się (cztery takie punkty przecięcia są stworzone). Poziomy nie są nigdy umieszczone w środku, bo ‘’przecinają’’ grafikę na połowę. Są umieszczone albo w górnej lub dolnej poziomej linii. Główną ideą jest nie umieszczanie tematu w centrum.
  • Kontrola ruchu odnosi się do sposobu, w jaki emocja jest odwzorowana w Grafice. Emocja może być zamrożona lub rozmazana. Przy czym jedna w cale nie jest lepsza od drugiej. To intencja odwzorowania jest ważna. Ruch jest ustosunkowany w obiektach na Grafice. Np. Fotografując samochód wyścigowy, który pojawia się zamrożony w relacji do tła, nie daje nam poczucia prędkości ruchu, a więc technika dyktuje reprezentacje samochodu w zamrożony sposób, ale z zamazanym tłem, aby stworzyć poczucie ruchu, ta technika to ‘’panoramowanie’’. Z drugiej strony zaprezentowanie koszykarza w skoku nie wymaga użycia tej techniki w związku z jego nienaturalną pozycją, co automatycznie sprawia że zdjęcie jest prawidłowe.
  • Głębia ostrości (DOF – Depth Of Field) odnosi się do części ostrości z przodu i za głównym tematem. Głębia ostrości jest wybrana odnośnie do specyficznych potrzeb każdego zdjęcia. Duża lub mała głębia ostrości może zwiększyć lub podważyć jakość grafiki. Niska głębia ostrości może być użyta dla przyciągnięcia uwagi do głównego tematu, oddzielając go od otoczenia. Wysoka głębia ostrości może być użyta do uwydatnienia przestrzeni. Soczewki krótkoogniskowe (szerokokątne) zapewniają większą głębię ostrości, i odwrotnie, soczewki o długich ogniskowych (teleobiektywy) mają małą głębię ostrości. Najmniejsze przesłony (zasunięte) powiększają głębię i odwrotnie, otwarte zmniejszają ją.

Na elementach graficznych mamy kształt, objętość, kolor, teksturę, perspektywę, równowagę, proporcję itd.

  • Kształt odnosi się do konturów głównych tematów.
  • Objętość odnosi się do trójwymiarowej jakości tematu. Jest to osiągane używając światła ze strony (z boku). Przeciwnie do generalnego poglądu, przednie światło nie jest najlepszym światłem. Ono dąży do spłaszczenia tematu. Najlepszym światło dzienne jest wczesnym rankiem lub późnym popołudniem.
  • Kolor jest ważny. Przesycenie kolorami nie jest dobre.
  • Tekstura odnosi się do jakości powierzchni tematu. Jest ona wzmagana przez boczne światło… to jest ”wyczucie” dotyku…
  • Perspektywa odnosi się do ”kąta” towarzyszącego przez linie, które znikają w znikającym punkcie, który może, lecz nie musi być wewnątrz grafiki.
  • Równowaga odnosi się do porozumienia tematów w grafice, które mogą dać albo równą wagę lub wydawać się cięższe z jednej strony.
  • Proporcja odnosi się do relacji wielkości tematów w zdjęciu. Generalnie dążymy do reprezentowania małych obiektów, małych w relacjach do innych, ale dobrą techniką jest reprezentowanie małych obiektów przeciwieństw do naturalnych rozmiarów wzajemnego stosunku. Na przykład, mały kwiat skupia większe zastanowienie niż wielka góra…. Nazywamy to odwróceniem skali.

Nie wszystkie elementy muszą być obecne. Niektóre fotografie mogą być osądzone na postawie indywidualnych charakterystyk, np. grafika może być o kolorze lub teksturze, lub kolorze i teksturze, itd.

Symboliczne znaczenie lub powiązanie…. Tu właśnie zaczyna się wojna na opinie…. Złe zdjęcie bardzo trudnego tematu jest lepsze niż zdjęcie dobre zwyczajnego tematu. Dobre zdjęcie trudnego tematu jest nadzwyczajną fotografią.

Grafiki mogą być zrobione kulturowo stronniczo przez fotografującego i/lub obserwatora. Znaczenie grafiki powinno być ocenione zgodnie z kulturalnym kontekstem grafiki, nie przez kulturalny kontekst obserwatora. Grafika „przemawia" do ludzi i ma siłę, aby wywoływać emocje takie jak wrażliwość, wściekłość, odrzucenie, radość, smutek itp. Dobre fotografie nie są ograniczone do wywoływania przyjemnych wrażeń….

Ponad Wszystko bądź kulturalny[edit]

Proszę nie zapomnij, że grafika, którą oceniasz, jest czyjąś pracą. Unikaj używania fraz takich jak „to wygląda strasznie” i „nienawidzę tego”. Jeżeli musisz być przeciw - rób to z rozwagą. Pamiętaj także, że twoja znajomość języka może nie być taka sama jak kogoś innego. Dobieraj swoje słowa z uwagą.

Miłego oceniania… i pamiętaj…. wszystkie zasady mogą być złamane.

Spis treści[edit]

Kandydatury do przyznania medalu[edit]

Odśwież stronę: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Andasol Solar Power Station 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2021 at 18:13:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Andasol is the first parabolic trough power plant in Europe, and Andasol 1 went online in March 2009. Because of the high altitude (1,100 m) and the semi-arid climate, the site has exceptionally high annual direct insolation of 2,200 kWh/m2 per year.

File:Oppeln - Młynówka chanel.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2021 at 16:08:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Opole (Oppeln), Silesia - Młynówka chanel

File:구리 동구릉 원릉 전경(항공).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2021 at 14:22:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Forest Fairy Tale.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2021 at 20:13:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The banks of the forest river Roshinka after a heavy snowfall
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have removed the category “Snow covered tree branches” (which had been added by me) because “Trees in snow” (added later) seems more appropriate. --Aristeas (talk) 11:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It’s a well done picture, surely QI, but nothing special to me, no wow, and a bit oversharpened. --Kreuzschnabel 10:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Kreuzschnabel. Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Final 2013 Fencing WCH FMS-EQ t194733.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2021 at 14:06:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Sports#Individual_sports
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jastrow - uploaded by Jastrow - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 14:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. I think it is pretty intriguing and unusual photo. Battle in progress. -- Andrei (talk) 14:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. So much of fencing happens in brief bursts of speed, and this captures that frenzy in between stances really well. Are they wearing lights on their heads? — Rhododendrites talk |  14:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
    They do! Different pair, but can be seen here File:Final 2013 Fencing WCH FMS-EQ t194440.jpg --Andrei (talk) 14:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Rhododendrites. --Aristeas (talk) 18:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Rhododendrites. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Gnosis (talk) 19:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:39, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others. Reminds me of some futurist art like this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The lighting trails are nice add-on -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:19, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good and highly inventive. I might be tempted to trim just a little of the black on both sides and the top to bring more emphasis on the figures. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very interesting --IamMM (talk) 04:20, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others -- Radomianin (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pudelek (talk) 16:10, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Its 100% art in action --Wilfredor (talk) 01:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) 6.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2021 at 05:13:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré 3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2021 at 23:37:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Canada
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 23:37, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Ambitious, but too much of it is unsharp. Daniel Case (talk) 01:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice shot! It's really impressive, but unfortunately the quality is not as good as FP. The color patterns of the windows are not visible properly, as is the altar. --IamMM (talk) 06:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I reluctantly agree with the others - absolutely beautiful, but not an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very good framing, would be absolutely beautiful … Could you repeat this shot with a tripod, or is no tripod allowed in that church? It could also help to focus just a bit nearer, loosing a little bit sharpness on the altar, but gaining much sharpness in the middle ground. --Aristeas (talk) 18:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
It is not possible, some churches in Quebec do not give permission to take photos with a tripod. I asked the parish priest and the archdioses for permission to no avail. It is the best take I could do, I could have uploaded a downsized version but I preferred to upload a full size version. Thanks for your question and comments --Wilfredor (talk) 01:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Ah, sorry, it’s a pity! Yes, sometimes the Church people are very helpful (once a sexton even asked me if she should turn on additional lighting which is normally used only for Xmas ;–), and sometimes they have absolutely no understanding; sometimes asking for permission works, sometimes it fails … In the case of this beautiful church that is especially regrettable. --Aristeas (talk) 08:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
I used a well-written letter format and sent it to many religious organizations. The most beautiful churches answered no, unfortunately, since they had their own photographer. It was difficult to explain that the photos had to be licensed for commercial use. It is very unfortunate that I cannot use a tripod. I also had very positive experiences in which they left me with full access to the Lights panel, I spent a whole day in the Church taking photos, but as I said they are not the most beautiful --Wilfredor (talk) 00:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Mohiniyattam at Kerala School Kalolsavam 2019 12.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2021 at 07:21:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you dear Aristeas Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
How many similar images are there in FP gallery!! Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Disagree. Can you show us two similar portraits from the gallery? Unless there is a clear mitigated reason, the lack of singularity is usually a valid reason to rebuke a candidate, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bottom crop too tight. Also, see my comments (attacked by the nominator) on another FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Yes, i remember. You oppose only because you unlike staged photographs. Mohiniyattam is a drama like dance which tells a story. Thus facial expressions are main attraction of this dance form. Please consider. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Please consider providing more room at the bottom and please consider taking a photo with the hands in focus. And please consider showing the dancer's hair bun which is lost against the background.Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
OK. Now it is a meaningful criticism. Thank you Charlesjsharp --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral pending resolution of the hair issue. Daniel Case (talk) 19:30, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Per Charlesjsharp. Black hair on a black background is not a good idea IMO --Llez (talk) 12:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose there are already two FPs of this event, and they are making a bit better impression --Andrei (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Andrei. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Jacky Winter - Glen Davis.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2021 at 05:45:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jacky winter

File:Bombus ruderarius - Taraxacum officinale - Keila.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2021 at 05:41:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bombus ruderarius

File:Harlingen. Sint-Michaëlkerk. Hoofdaltaar. HDR. 12-07-2021. (d.j.b) 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2021 at 04:29:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Speckled mousebirds (Colius striatus kikuyensis) pair.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2021 at 15:30:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Speckled mousebirds (Colius striatus kikuyensis) pair

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Typical drinks of Madeira[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2021 at 12:39:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

File:Berlin Heizkraftwerk Wilmersdorf asv2021-04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2021 at 11:57:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wilmersdorf plant
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info View of the Power station Berlin-Wilmersdorf after rainfall; with the Motorway A100 in the foreground. All by A.Savin --A.Savin 11:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 11:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice dark clouds, excellent balanced (even the cars on the road) --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:31, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Michielverbeek --IamMM (talk) 18:05, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The slight re-sharpening pattern in the sky is disturbing.--Ermell (talk) 08:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 14:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I might have cropped it in on the sides more to emphasize the smokestacks more, but there are also arguments to be made for the present framing. Daniel Case (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 15:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Beautiful light. --Aristeas (talk) 06:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay 💬 10:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Daniel and Aristeas -- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC) Doubled vote. --A.Savin 09:40, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'd like this better with a closer crop on the left, but this nomination will pass as is, and I respect that. There's much to like about this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:36, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Ślewiński Władysław, Woman Combing her Hair.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2021 at 11:39:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Woman Combing her Hair

File:Manjanggul lava column, largest in the world.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2021 at 05:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Manjanggul's lava column
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ahmed - uploaded by Ahmed - nominated by Ahmed -- Ahmed (talk) 05:59, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ahmed (talk) 05:59, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poorly composed—there's a lot distracting you from the subject—and poorly done from a technical standpoint: there's a lot of unsharpness, purple fringing on the floodlight, and a near-blown highlight in the middle. Daniel Case (talk) 05:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Gallery link refined ;–). For gallery pages like “Places/Natural”, please add also the country section. --Aristeas (talk) 11:28, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Case for technical shortcomings, this is too far from perfect. Fascinating object of course but that alone does not qualify for a feature – we’re judging pictures, not objects :) --Kreuzschnabel 17:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Bestoernesto (talk) 04:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The spotlights are very distracting and the compo looks a bit random -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

File:First MQ-4C Triton test flight.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2021 at 21:53:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

First MQ-4C Triton test flight
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by United States Navy - uploaded & nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM 21:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --ToprakM 21:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Maybe it's the dull background, but this just doesn't stand out enough from other photographs of military aircraft in flight for me to see it as an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The lgihting is low key but the design of of this high altitude survelillance aircraft is unusual and raises interest. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Daniel Case. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Gemeiner Spaltblättling, Schizophyllum commune-20191216-RM-152856.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2021 at 20:11:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Schizophyllum commune in the Bruderwald in Bamberg:Focus stack of 18 frames

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Schizophyllum commune in the Bruderwald in Bamberg. Focus stack of 18 frames. All by ermell -- Ermell (talk) 20:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment one note added (cropping/cloning error). I suggest to crop out narrow oof part on the bottom. Description is missing date. --Ivar (talk) 20:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Solved. Thanks for the hint.--Ermell (talk) 08:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Mile (talk) 15:41, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Technically well-done save for that one cloning error but I just don't see an FP here. Daniel Case (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question About how big are these mushrooms? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info 2-3 cm.--Ermell (talk) 07:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks. That makes the picture more impressive, and you might note that in the file descriptions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral oof area still at the bottom and imo too much empty space at top. --Ivar (talk) 05:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support But I'd prefer also a tighter crop at the top --Llez (talk) 15:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I thought of that too. But if you take the blurred background into consideration, I find the progression and shape of the colours quite interesting. The oof foreground also fits in with this.--Ermell (talk) 19:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Bestoernesto (talk) 04:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very impressive. (I would not crop it, or only a tiny little bit at the top.) --Aristeas (talk) 06:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Why don't you cut the blurred part at the bottom? --Commonists 19:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO OK, but I would crop out the little unsharp area at the bottom. --XRay 💬 10:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think, that this object could be diplayed from better camera position, another angle... -- Karelj (talk) 16:28, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support but per XRAY. --Cayambe (talk) 17:51, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Gelada (Theropithecus gelada gelada) male.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2021 at 09:30:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gelada (Theropithecus gelada) male in Ethiopia
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Male dozing. The gelada "baboon" is also known as the bleeding-heart monkey. They are endemic to the highlands of Ethiopia. Adult males have an impressive cape of hair on their backs. No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sharp picture of the monkey, and I love the background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Well-done as always and definitely a QI. But I find the plant on the animal's right a distraction from it. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose That bush is so similar to monkey. --Mile (talk) 07:38, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm OK with the background, the plant is interesting and in its original size did not distract me. --IamMM (talk) 18:13, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Bestoernesto (talk) 04:46, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support It’s a pity about the same-colour bush, but everything else is very good. --Aristeas (talk) 06:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Mile, background not good. -- Karelj (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:11, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Karelj. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:15, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

File:BUNGLON.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2021 at 08:28:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Olah Pencak Silat Warisan Dunia Dari Indonesia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2021 at 08:31:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
User:Deni Dahniel, in case pings work on FPC (they apparently don't on QIC), would you like to try eliminating the areas of purple chromatic aberration? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Big WOW. --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very interesting. Sharpness could be better, CAs should be removed. --XRay 💬 10:18, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Portrait of King Yeongjo - Chae Yong Shin (蔡龍臣 1850-1941) Cho Seok-jin (趙錫晉 1853-1920) et (cropped).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2021 at 06:35:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Eastern amberwing (75121).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2021 at 17:26:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male eastern amberwing dragonfly
  • Oppose withdrawn because of tiny size. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • What is it doing? It seemed to be repeatedly sallying out from this and nearby perches. — Rhododendrites talk |  21:34, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Resting between forays. Many dragonflies (but not damselflies) return to the same perch to rest. This makes them quite easy to photograph. Many photographers (not me) use tripods. Others, like the large hawkers, seldom stop are are a nightware to find perched. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • So when they perch, they are no longer looking for prey? They wait until they take off to do that? — Rhododendrites talk |  14:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • That's right. Of course they may be hunting for a female. I've never seen this dragonfly, but it seems to be about half the size you suggest. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry about changing my mind, but the alternative is FP for me and much better than this one, head position included, even with the instrusive reed more prominent. You might consider removing it. Can you add as an alt? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
I think the other one might be technically more perfect, but I still prefer this one for the pose. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
The other one is much better, but let's wait for others before withdrawing this nom.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
As things stand, with only one oppose and nobody striking their support, this is going to pass. I think I have to understand no response after ping + new supports = keep this nomination open. I would nominate the other one separately, suggesting that we only promote the one with more support, but I do not have another FPC slot open. — Rhododendrites talk |  16:47, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • @Bestoernesto: Please add the missing {{s}} or {{o}} or whatever; without it your vote cannot be counted ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 06:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Tiger swallowtail (74863).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2021 at 17:03:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male tiger swallowtail on mountainmint
  • It would be a good reason for this nomination to fail at COM:VIC. FPC isn't only about the prototypical representation of a species. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • I disagree. "the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects." This image would not/should not be used on any projects. Without knowing what the butterfly should look like, people could use this - thinking 'well, it's Wiki Commond FP, must be fine'. Damaged insects are much easier to photograph and we always search for 'fresh' ones - not always succeeding. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:34, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question How about if the lack of the tails is mentioned in the file description? Could you add that, Rhododendrites? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Started to do just that yesterday but didn't save, I guess. — Rhododendrites talk |  14:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seven Pandas (talk) 22:28, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It is nature. Elephant without one horn can not be FP !? --Mile (talk) 07:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
    Horn? --A.Savin 09:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • One tusk would not likely not make an elephant FP, when there are so many to photograph with two. Of course there can be 'character' FPs with obviously damaged limbs or whatever. The point about this butterfly image is that you cannot tell it is damaged unless you know what it should look like. We risk devaluing Commons FPs. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Buddha Dhatu Jadi DJI 0249-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2021 at 19:13:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Bangladesh
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by Azimronnie - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 19:13, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:13, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting bird's eye view. -- King of ♥ 00:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Interesting perspective, beautiful colors --Kritzolina (talk) 06:33, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ×Elvorixtalk 07:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 09:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Composition feels unbalanced to me. Perhaps a small crop on the bottom? — Rhododendrites talk |  17:31, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
    I was thinking that too. -- King of ♥ 05:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment True, it seems very strange position. 3D moving could help.--Mile (talk) 07:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support But I would 2nd the bottom crop idea. – Gallery link improved: fits better into our “Religious buildings” gallery. --Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Quality not convincing. There are CA's and the tower at the right is out of focus. --A.Savin 09:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 20:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support JukoFF (talk) 22:36, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 11:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 08:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice, but please fix the CAs. --XRay 💬 10:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

File:The Bug Peek.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2021 at 09:27:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • That was yellow and redis colored grass and picture was taken in the little light of morning sun which turned out that color with macro lens.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mildeep (talk • contribs)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question lovely idea, well executed, but the (surely not spontaneous Mildeep?) background is off-putting. Why the colour? I would like to know the bug id. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Is this focus-stacked? - looking at the antennae etc. there are strange changes in focus. I assume the bug is alive, but it is strange that it has poked its antennae through a leaf - which must be held up by hand? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I don't know the ID of this Arthropods. Yeah that is 3 images stacked. The bug was alive and it was in the small tree branch but not held up by hand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mildeep (talk • contribs)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral pending resolution of background question. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support JukoFF (talk) 22:36, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Biplab Anand (Talk) 09:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Amazing composition, however, a bit oversharpened. DoF is completely understood because the conditions --Wilfredor (talk) 15:06, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Bestoernesto (talk) 04:30, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Wilfredor. --Aristeas (talk) 06:46, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


Tabela czasu[edit]

Thu 22 Jul → Fri 6 Aug
Fri 23 Jul → Sat 7 Aug
Sat 24 Jul → Sun 8 Aug
Sun 25 Jul → Mon 9 Aug
Mon 26 Jul → Tue 10 Aug
Tue 27 Jul → Wed 11 Aug
Wed 28 Jul → Thu 12 Aug
Thu 29 Jul → Fri 13 Aug
Fri 30 Jul → Sat 14 Aug
Sat 31 Jul → Sun 15 Aug
Sun 1 Aug → Mon 16 Aug
Mon 2 Aug → Tue 17 Aug
Tue 3 Aug → Wed 18 Aug
Wed 4 Aug → Thu 19 Aug
Thu 5 Aug → Fri 20 Aug
Fri 6 Aug → Sat 21 Aug