Commons:Kandydatury do grafik na medal

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Prezentacja grafik kandydatów w innych językach:

Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | հայերեն | +/−

Shortcut: COM:FPC Na tej stronie prezentowani są kandydaci do wyróżnionych grafik (na polskiej Wikipedii "Grafika na medal"). Zwróć uwagę, że nie jest to samo co Grafika dnia, która jest inną forma wyróżnienia.

Aby obejrzeć archiwum poprzednio nominowanych grafik, przejdź na stronę: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.

Istnieje także chronologiczna lista wyróżnionych grafik. Zobacz także: Kandydatów do grafik wysokiej jakości oraz Okiem fotografów.

Formalności[edit]

Nominacja[edit]

Jeżeli uważasz, że znalazłeś/aś zdjęcie lub stworzyłeś/aś grafikę, która może być uważana jako wartościowa, z odpowiednim opisem i licencją, skopiuj nazwę grafiki w to pole (zawierającą prefiks File:), po tym jak tekst będzie już w polu:


Potem musisz ręcznie wprowadzić link do stworzonej strony na górze Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Głosowanie[edit]

Aby wyrazić swoje poparcie, możesz użyć następujących szablonów:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),

lub aby wyrazić swoją dezaprobatę:

  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),

Możesz także użyć:

  • Neutralny: {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • Komentarz: {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • Informacja: {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info).
  • Pytanie: {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question),
  • Prośba: {{Request}} (Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request).

Proszę, postaraj się napisać kilka słów, dlaczego podoba Ci się (lub nie podoba) dane zdjęcie - szczególnie, gdy głosujesz przeciw. Pamiętaj również, aby złożyć swój podpis (~~~~).

Zasady prezentacji grafik kandydatów[edit]

Zasady główne[edit]

  1. Po zakończeniu okresu głosowania wynik będzie ogłoszony 15. dnia po nominacji (tak jak jest to pokazane w tabelce czasowej poniżej). A więc okres głosowania to dwa tygodnie (plus godziny do końca 14. dnia). Głosy dodane 15. dnia i później nie są liczone.
  2. Nominacje zgłaszane przez anonimowych uczestników są mile widziane.
  3. Wkład do dyskusji przez anonimowych uczestników jest również mile widziany.
  4. Głosy oddane przez anonimowych uczestników nie są liczone.
  5. Nominacje nie liczą się jako głosy. Poparcie musi być wyraźnie określone.
  6. Nominowani mogą wycofać swoje nominowane zdjęcia w każdej chwili - pisząc: "I withdraw my nomination" lub dodając tekst {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
  7. Pamiętaj, że celem projektu Wikimedia Commons jest zapewnienie centralnego repozytorium dla grafik używanych przez wszystkie projekty Wikimedia, łącznie z możliwymi przyszłymi projektami. To nie jest po prostu depozyt dla grafik Wikipedii, więc grafiki nie powinny być tutaj oceniane na podstawie ich przydatności dla tego projektu.
  8. Zdjęcia mogą być usuwane z listy, jeżeli nie mają żadnego poparcia (nie licząc nominujących) w 5. dniu (dzień nominacji + 5).
  9. Zdjęcie oznaczone szablonem {{FPX}} może zostać usunięte z listy po 24 godzinach od zastosowania tego znacznika, pod warunkiem że nie ma ono głosów popierających poza nominującym.

Zasady publikacji grafik[edit]

Grafika kandydata zostanie umieszczona, jeżeli będzie spełniać następujące warunki:

  1. Odpowiednia licencja (co jest oczywiste)
  2. Grafika musi mieć przynajmniej 7 głosów poparcia
  3. Podział głosów popierających/przeciwnych musi mieścić się przynajmniej w stosunku 2/1 (większość dwóch - trzecich)
  4. Nie mogą być wybrane dwie różne wersje tej samej grafiki - wybrana zostanie wersja z większą liczbą oddanych głosów.

Zobacz jak postępować ze starymi nominacjami: Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#Co zrobić kiedy głosowanie się zakończy.

Usuwanie zdjęć prezentowanych kandydatów[edit]

Nadgodzinowa zamiana standardów zamieszczonej grafiki. Może się tak zdarzyć, że dla niektórych grafik formalne wystarczająco dobre nie jest już aktualne. To jest dla listy zdjęć, które wierzysz, że nie zasługują dłużej by być prezentowaną grafiką. To wymaga 2/3 głosów większości (i minimum 5 głosów) zgadzających się na usunięcie z listy prezentowanych zdjęć. Jeżeli nie ma 2/3 głosów zgadzających się na usunięcie z listy, nominacja zostaje jako prezentowana grafika. Dla nich głosuj "Zachowaj" Symbol keep vote.svg Keep (to zasługuje by być prezentowaną grafiką) lub "Usuń z listy" Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist (to nie zasługuje by być prezentowaną grafiką). Proszę zapewnij link do oryginalnej FP nominacji (to pojawi się pod Links na stronie opisu grafiki). Inaczej te same zasady jak te powyżej wchodzą w życie. Proszę użyj tego linku this link aby dodać nowego możliwego do usunięcia kandydata.

Wskazówki dla nominujących[edit]

Poniżej możesz znaleźć niektóre ”informacje” na temat zasad, które zdjęcia powinny spełniać:

  • Rozdzielczość – Grafiki zlokalizowane na Commons mogą być używane nie tylko do oglądania na ekranie. Mogą zostać również użyte do drukowania lub oglądania na monitorach o bardzo wysokiej rozdzielczości. Nie możemy także przewidzieć, jakie urządzenia zostaną użyte w przyszłości, a więc ważne jest, aby zdjęcia, które są nominowane, miały tak dużą rozdzielczość jak tylko jest to możliwe. Rozdzielczość powinna być przynajmniej na poziomie 2 mln pikseli (np. 2000x1000), co wydaje się rozsądne na obecną chwilę.
  • Ostrość – każdy ważny przedmiot na grafice powinien być odpowiednio ostry (nie rozmyty).
  • Pierwszy plan i drugi plan – obiekty pierwszoplanowe i drugoplanowe mogą przeszkadzać i odwracać uwagę od głównej zawartości grafiki. Powinieneś/aś sprawdzić czy obiekt z przodu nie zasłania innych ważnych elementów i czy coś na drugim planie nie rozprasza kompozycji (np. gdy światło latarni nie świeci nad czyjąś głową).
  • Głównie Jakość – grafiki nominowane powinny mieć dobrą techniczną jakość.
  • Wartość – naszym głównym celem jest prezentowanie najbardziej wartościowych grafik ze wszystkich dostępnych. Zdjęcia powinny być na swój sposób wyjątkowe, więc bądź tego świadomy/a:
    • prawie wszystkie wschody słońca są ładne i większość takich zdjęć nie jest inna w swojej esencji od innych,
    • zdjęcia nocy są ładne, ale zasadniczo więcej detali można zobaczyć na zdjęciach zrobionych w czasie dnia.
    • piękne nie zawsze musi znaczyć wartościowe.

Nie każda zasada musi być dopasowana, np. grafika może mieć niewielką rozdzielczość, ponieważ wyższa rozdzielczość nie może już być zrobiona (temat zdjęcia już nie żyje lub nie istnieje) lub wydarzenie już nigdy więcej się nie powtórzy.

Wskazówki do oceniania grafik[edit]

Istnieje kilka kryteriów dla oceniania grafik.

Z technicznej strony mamy ekspozycję, kompozycję, kontrolę ruchu i głębokość pola.

  • Ekspozycja odnosi się do zamkniętego diagramu kombinacji, który wykonuje grafikę z stonowaną krzywą, która jest idealnie zdolna do reprezentacji szczegółów cieni i punktów szczytowych w grafice. To nazywamy poziomem. Grafiki mogą być na niskiej stronie stonowanej krzywej (niski zasięg), środkowej (środkowy zasięg) lub wysokiej stronie (wysoki zasięg). Kamery cyfrowe (lub grafiki) mają bardziej skurczony poziom niż film. Brak detalu cienia nie jest koniecznie charakterystyczny dla negatywu. Faktycznie może to być część zaplanowanego efektu. Wypalone szczytowe punkty w dużych częściach rozpraszają element.
  • Kompozycja odnosi się do uzgodnienia elementów w grafice. ”Zasada Trójpodziału” jest dobrą wskazówką dla kompozycji i jest odziedziczona ze szkoły malarstwa. Ideą tą jest rozdzielenie grafiki z dwiema poziomymi i dwiema pionowymi liniami, w ten sposób dzieląc grafikę w trzecie poziomo i pionowo. Centrowanie tematu jest zawsze uważane za złą praktykę. Tematy zainteresowania są zawsze umieszczone w jednym z ‘’punktów zainteresowania’’, gdzie poziome i pionowe linie przecinają się (cztery takie punkty przecięcia są stworzone). Poziomy nie są nigdy umieszczone w środku, bo ‘’przecinają’’ grafikę na połowę. Są umieszczone albo w górnej lub dolnej poziomej linii. Główną ideą jest nie umieszczanie tematu w centrum.
  • Kontrola ruchu odnosi się do sposobu, w jaki emocja jest odwzorowana w Grafice. Emocja może być zamrożona lub rozmazana. Przy czym jedna w cale nie jest lepsza od drugiej. To intencja odwzorowania jest ważna. Ruch jest ustosunkowany w obiektach na Grafice. Np. Fotografując samochód wyścigowy, który pojawia się zamrożony w relacji do tła, nie daje nam poczucia prędkości ruchu, a więc technika dyktuje reprezentacje samochodu w zamrożony sposób, ale z zamazanym tłem, aby stworzyć poczucie ruchu, ta technika to ‘’panoramowanie’’. Z drugiej strony zaprezentowanie koszykarza w skoku nie wymaga użycia tej techniki w związku z jego nienaturalną pozycją, co automatycznie sprawia że zdjęcie jest prawidłowe.
  • Głębia ostrości (DOF – Depth Of Field) odnosi się do części ostrości z przodu i za głównym tematem. Głębia ostrości jest wybrana odnośnie do specyficznych potrzeb każdego zdjęcia. Duża lub mała głębia ostrości może zwiększyć lub podważyć jakość grafiki. Niska głębia ostrości może być użyta dla przyciągnięcia uwagi do głównego tematu, oddzielając go od otoczenia. Wysoka głębia ostrości może być użyta do uwydatnienia przestrzeni. Soczewki krótkoogniskowe (szerokokątne) zapewniają większą głębię ostrości, i odwrotnie, soczewki o długich ogniskowych (teleobiektywy) mają małą głębię ostrości. Najmniejsze przesłony (zasunięte) powiększają głębię i odwrotnie, otwarte zmniejszają ją.

Na elementach graficznych mamy kształt, objętość, kolor, teksturę, perspektywę, równowagę, proporcję itd.

  • Kształt odnosi się do konturów głównych tematów.
  • Objętość odnosi się do trójwymiarowej jakości tematu. Jest to osiągane używając światła ze strony (z boku). Przeciwnie do generalnego poglądu, przednie światło nie jest najlepszym światłem. Ono dąży do spłaszczenia tematu. Najlepszym światło dzienne jest wczesnym rankiem lub późnym popołudniem.
  • Kolor jest ważny. Przesycenie kolorami nie jest dobre.
  • Tekstura odnosi się do jakości powierzchni tematu. Jest ona wzmagana przez boczne światło… to jest ”wyczucie” dotyku…
  • Perspektywa odnosi się do ”kąta” towarzyszącego przez linie, które znikają w znikającym punkcie, który może, lecz nie musi być wewnątrz grafiki.
  • Równowaga odnosi się do porozumienia tematów w grafice, które mogą dać albo równą wagę lub wydawać się cięższe z jednej strony.
  • Proporcja odnosi się do relacji wielkości tematów w zdjęciu. Generalnie dążymy do reprezentowania małych obiektów, małych w relacjach do innych, ale dobrą techniką jest reprezentowanie małych obiektów przeciwieństw do naturalnych rozmiarów wzajemnego stosunku. Na przykład, mały kwiat skupia większe zastanowienie niż wielka góra…. Nazywamy to odwróceniem skali.

Nie wszystkie elementy muszą być obecne. Niektóre fotografie mogą być osądzone na postawie indywidualnych charakterystyk, np. grafika może być o kolorze lub teksturze, lub kolorze i teksturze, itd.

Symboliczne znaczenie lub powiązanie…. Tu właśnie zaczyna się wojna na opinie…. Złe zdjęcie bardzo trudnego tematu jest lepsze niż zdjęcie dobre zwyczajnego tematu. Dobre zdjęcie trudnego tematu jest nadzwyczajną fotografią.

Grafiki mogą być zrobione kulturowo stronniczo przez fotografującego i/lub obserwatora. Znaczenie grafiki powinno być ocenione zgodnie z kulturalnym kontekstem grafiki, nie przez kulturalny kontekst obserwatora. Grafika „przemawia" do ludzi i ma siłę, aby wywoływać emocje takie jak wrażliwość, wściekłość, odrzucenie, radość, smutek itp. Dobre fotografie nie są ograniczone do wywoływania przyjemnych wrażeń….

Ponad Wszystko bądź kulturalny[edit]

Proszę nie zapomnij, że grafika, którą oceniasz, jest czyjąś pracą. Unikaj używania fraz takich jak „to wygląda strasznie” i „nienawidzę tego”. Jeżeli musisz być przeciw - rób to z rozwagą. Pamiętaj także, że twoja znajomość języka może nie być taka sama jak kogoś innego. Dobieraj swoje słowa z uwagą.

Miłego oceniania… i pamiętaj…. wszystkie zasady mogą być złamane.

Spis treści[edit]

Kandydatury do przyznania medalu[edit]

Odśwież stronę: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Oenopia lyncea3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 06:36:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oenopia lyncea

File:Egretta garzetta in the United Kingdom.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 21:33:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Egretta garzetta in the United Kingdom

File:Sociable weaver (Philetairus socius).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 20:43:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sociable weaver (Philetairus socius)

File:Hortus Haren. 06-05-2020 (d.j.b.) 06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 15:44:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Lamprotornis superbus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 11:50:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lamprotornis superbus (Rüppell, 1845)(Superb starling), Karlsruhe Zoo

File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 18:02:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White circles 10 feet (3.0 m) in diameter, spaced 8 feet (2.4 m) apart, are painted on the grass at Dolores Park in San Francisco to encourage social distancing during Memorial Day weekend amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Christopher Michel - uploaded by Tm - nominated by Mxn -- Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just as striking and educational as the photo from May 23 but higher-quality. Though the grass has gotten a little worn by Memorial Day, it shows more of the circles and a larger crowd has come out to use them. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 18:08, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 20:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I would support if it was taken legally and the CC licence etc. is OK. Is it illegal to fly a drone in a San Francisco park? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp: The photo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license, which is acceptable for this project. As for whether the photographer broke any rules, I can't say for certain. The Recreation & Parks Department doesn't allow drones to take off or land at city parks without permission, but Dolores Park isn't in an FAA no-drone zone. [1][2][3] The photographer hasn't indicated whether the drone took off from Dolores Park or from somewhere else nearby for this particular photo, or whether they got permission to take off at the park. (Some other photos were taken a good distance away from the park.) – Minh Nguyễn 💬 23:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Neptuul (talk) 21:24, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yeah, this one definitely. --A.Savin 23:10, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice thumbnail, unfortunately at full size blown highlights everywhere, in every single white part. Technically not well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes, a nice illustration of the Quarantine period, but otherwise per Basile Morin. --Cayambe (talk) 05:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support idea & compo clearly outweigh minor technical issues --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wow.--Grtek (talk) 10:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile Morin. --Karelj (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --Ivar (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strong compo, quality is improvable but still ok to me give the wow factor Poco a poco (talk) 18:10, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Benh (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Cologne Germany Cologne-Gay-Pride-2015 Parade-06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 12:07:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cologne, Germany: Drag queen "Tatjana Taft" at Cologne Pride Parade 2015

File:Garden warbler (Sylvia borin) at the UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Swabian Alb.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 12:12:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Swabian Alb is a fascinating place to listen and, if lucky enough, watch birds such as the Eurasian skylark and others. This Garden Warbler was spied singing his beautiful spring anthem in an almost blooming Hawthorn Crataegus monogyna. UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Swabian Alb.

File:Dolina Chochołowska i tatrzańskie krokusy.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 10:13:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tatra National Park
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Qvidemus - uploaded by Qvidemus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, I like this. I can see others opposing because of the blurry foreground though. I don't mind the blown-out areas, it seems to me that in a very bright sunny photo the highlights kind of should be dazzlingly bright. Overall this is a dreamlike composition and it really works. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice mood and some beautiful light effects. --Bob Collowan (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Apart fromt the tilt I see a nice scene with moderate wow effect, disturbing elements (like left crop, shadow on right) and some overexposed areas, overall not a FP to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Resedafalter am Morgen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 09:53:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Red kite (Milvus milvus).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 09:46:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red kite (Milvus milvus) hunting

File:Masked Lapwing - Newington.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 05:00:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Masked Lapwing
  • @Frank Schulenburg: Did You look at shooting time? It was early in the morning, when light conditions were soft and warm. --Ivar (talk) 10:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Pfersag-Wasserfall-20200308-RM-113024.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 21:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pfersag waterfall in the district of Lichtenfels in Upper Franconia
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Waterfall in the district of Lichtenfels in Upper Franconia. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very beautiful, but framing could be slightly better: crop out a bit on the left, give a bit more breathing room at the top. -- King of ♥ 22:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very high resolution but the light is not very attractive, and the composition not well balanced (crop at the top too tight) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Basile. I wasn't sure about this and I nearly supported it because of the great resolution, but I don't like the light, it's too dull for me and doesn't stand out from other FP waterfalls. I also think the detail looks a little bit odd at full size, hard to explain it though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above, and the amount of water is a bit limited, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Nové Mlýny Reservoir - Dam 2020 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 20:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dam of Nové Mlýny reservoir cascade
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Czech Republic
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The exact gallery for the Czech Republic doesn't yet exist. Not sure about the right procedure. --T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Light is maybe not the best but I like the composition and the reflection. Wouldn't worry about specifying a gallery that doesn't exist yet, I've done that before. Cmao20 (talk) 22:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dull light, ordinary image -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's fine, but lacking in wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 07:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile -- Alsakan (talk) 16:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Merfeld, Wildpferdebahn, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2020 -- 7245.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 17:19:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dülmen pony in the Merfeld Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Perissodactyla_(Odd-toed_ungulates)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 17:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 17:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition is too jumbled for me, with the ponies all facing different directions and failing to present a cohesive message. -- King of ♥ 21:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great quality but I agree with KoH, it looks a bit too much like a snapshot rather than a careful composition. Good QI though and probably great for illustrating the animal in Wikipedia etc. Cmao20 (talk) 22:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The light is not working for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 07:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Du hast da noch andere Aufnahmen in der Serie, die mir besser gefallen haben. Auf jeden Fall ein tolles Motiv. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Ja, mir gefallen auch mehrere. Als Fotograf bin ich immer ein wenig voreingenommen, bin aber für jeden Tipp dankbar. ;-) --XRay talk 16:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
z.B. diese Aufnahme (kann allerdings sein, dass die Ausrichtung noch leicht korrigiert werden muss) —Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC) P.S. Oder auch dieses
Danke für die Tipps! Ich nehme sie gerne auf. --XRay talk 18:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Stadtquartier Overbergplatz -- 2020 -- 7378 (bw).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 17:14:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

StadtQuartier Overbergplatz, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Bergtocht van Guarda via Ardez en Ftan naar Scuol. 20-09-2019. (actm.) 27.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 15:45:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Answer: This ruin is no longer square. And is propped on the inside to keep the walls upright.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Rotes Rathaus, Berlin-Mitte, Fassadendetails Ostseite, 160213, ako.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 15:11:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:SL Galle Fort asv2020-01 img24.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 15:05:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Galle Lighthouse

File:Klagenfurt Innere Stadt Theaterplatz 4 Stadttheater SW-Ansicht 18052020 9029.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 14:36:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Klagenfurt Innere Stadt Theaterplatz

File:Hairdresser cutting hair.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 14:05:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hairdresser cutting hair
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 14:05, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice idea but it doesn't work for me. Not sure what the messy background adds to the photograph, and I also feel like I'd like to see more at the bottom of the frame. Also everything in this pic looks a little bit bunched together in the midtones, with no real shadows or highlights. All in all I think this is a good and useful QI of a man doing his job, but not more than that. Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
These types of hairdressers are widely spread in Venezuela. People often cut hair in the backyard of their houses, and btw hygiene in the third world is different, what you call messy is more reuse of recycled materials as the only option as objects are almost never discarded. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perhaps a VI for the reasons Wilfredor mentioned, but just doesn't make it as FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Daniel. --T.Bednarz (talk) 19:44, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Durmitor mountains, Montenegro.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 11:13:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Montenegro
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition and for once I think the shadows really add to it, they give the landscape depth somehow. Maybe the resolution is a bit low for FP though. Cmao20 (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per above. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Could you add the location? -- -donald- (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is not "extraordinary enough to be FP" for me. It is highly subjective. I have seen a lots of mountainous landscapes in my life and this one is just too ordinary for me (although defínitelly nice and well done.) --Grtek (talk) 10:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Grtek Poco a poco (talk) 18:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:San Francisco under Quarantine.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 06:37:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A series of white circles 10 feet (3.0 m) in diameter, spaced 8 feet (2.4 m) apart, are painted on the grass at Dolores Park in San Francisco to encourage social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Christopher Michel - uploaded by Mikani - nominated by Mxn -- Minh Nguyễn 💬 06:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Striking pattern, great angle, and notable. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 06:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Would love to support, but unfortunately too small and blurry. Renata3 (talk) 07:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support quality not too high, but very unique and high educational value. Tomer T (talk) 07:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice idea, need a better camera. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Big WOW. --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:33, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Peulle (talk) 08:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Fresh idea. I may support, if the original resolution with more level of details was uploaded. --A.Savin 13:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Of course more resolution would be nice, but this is one of those photos where its striking originality outweighs concerns over technical quality. Cmao20 (talk) 14:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral This is a brilliant shot but unfortunately resolution is too low. -- King of ♥ 15:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • May 24, 2020
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment @Renata3, Charlesjsharp, Peulle, A.Savin, King of Hearts: The photographer returned yesterday with a better camera, but unfortunately by then the circles had faded a bit and there weren't as many people out in the park using them. I think I still prefer the original photo for more variety compared to the later photo. It's possible that the crowds will come back out another weekend, but I'm not sure if the photographer will keep returning to this spot. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    The original does look better at thumbnail size, but I would certainly vote for the picture on the right if the original never existed. So that makes it more suitable to become Commons FP. -- King of ♥ 18:08, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    I've linked the two photos together so readers can discover them both. Should I open a new nomination for the higher-resolution photo or just swap it in? (Or would it be a stretch to nominate a set of just two photos?) – Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    They obviously returned with the same drone/camera. --A.Savin 19:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    @Mxn: Perhaps we could ask the Flickr user whether they have a higher-resolution version of the first image and would be willing to share it? -- King of ♥ 20:30, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    @King of Hearts: It's like they read our minds. :^) – Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment In The Times of London today. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per others --Neptuul (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Memorial Day
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Christopher Michel came back on Memorial Day for a higher-resolution shot with more people, so I've opened a new nomination for that image specifically: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You shouldn't have the two running nominations (by the way I find self-indulgent complicated user names annoying - they are difficult to copy - not just yours of courseǃ) User:Mxn Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for the suggestion! This is my first nomination ever, so I wasn't aware of the process for withdrawing a nomination. I've done that below. As for (presumably) my signature, there's a number of reasons why changing my user name to my real name is impractical at this point, but I do prefer to sign my real name as a gesture of accountability. (I only use CSS small-caps to clarify which is the family name, because Vietnamese names normally put the family name first, whereas I'm following the Western convention on wikis where I normally use English.) Thank you for being patient with me. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination in favor of Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg – Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Three-course meal including Bistecca alla fiorentina (Bistec a la fiorentina).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 17:41:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Andrei (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crops don't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I take Charles' point but it looks so tasty I can't oppose, especially when you have presented it to us with such high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 00:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is a nice, moody image and the crop is OK for me, too. However the flaw I see is that according to the image title, the scene is about the meat which isn't in focus while focus is set on the secondary elements like bread and the cheese. --Basotxerri (talk) 08:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

*Symbol support vote.svg Support The focus should have been on the lemons, then the roast would certainly have been a bit sharper. But it is still good.--Ermell (talk) 09:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with T.Bednarz.--Ermell (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well, according to Wikipedia, it shouldn't be served with lemon. All the bread etc. has nothing to do with the dish (Bistecca alla fiorentina), which is (as pointed out above) blurred. My view, as written previously Cmao20, is that high resolution should not be a major factor to be considered here. High resolution for panoramas, church interiors, macro insects etc. are essential so you can zoom in on the details. High resolution of an out-of-focus image surely doesn't add any value, does it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose According to the title “Bistecca alla Fiorentina” the meat has to be in the center of the picture and not cheese and bread, which are not elements of a real Fiorentina dish.--Christof46 (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Tomascastelazo, I fixed the gallery and categories for you on this since you still seems to have some trouble with that. Do you want me to re-name and move this file to: "Three-course meal including Bistecca alla fiorentina (Bistec a la fiorentina).jpg"? I think that would make this nomination go better. --Cart (talk) 18:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Cart lol! I am useless in categorizing!!! I woul really appreciate you doing what you suggest!!! Keep safe and many thanks!!! Tomascastelazo (talk)
  • Ok, will fix. Stay safe, you too! --Cart (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Please Cart ping those who voted in favour of the previous description, not just the oppose voters. Let's have balance. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Charlesjsharp, I pinged those who had voiced some problem with the name or the context of it, otherwise I would've pinged opposer T.Bednarz in that post too. But as per your request I'm pinging everybody else now, I hope that is satisfactory for you. Pinging Cmao20, Andrei, Ermell. --Cart (talk) 21:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • by simply changing the wording of the title makes me confused, what is the message of the picture?--Christof46 (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Though the enormous resolution, I am not a fan of this image. Considering it as a studio shot, I'd prefer not to have the cropped parts of the image, like the plate or the lemon slices, displayed in it at all. I'm also not impressed by the focus, since the main part of the dish is blurred as mentioned above. However, the piece of blue tapestry in the background looks also quite redundant to me. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 18:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- My criterium when looking at pictures of food is, does it make me hungry? This picture does. MartinD (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per T.Bednarz. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support "Bread and Cheese to be eaten after having a nice Bistecca". OK, then. And per MartinD. --Basotxerri (talk) 13:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. Also, the foods are not appealing enough for me. -- Alsakan (talk) 18:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The whole table to me looks too arranged for a real-life situation but too chaotic for a studio setup. It feels like ist was arranged hastily ("before you all dig in, let's push it all together so we can take a picture"), and that doesn't work. The crumpled corner of the red tapestry plays a big part in that. As it is now, the three slices of bread are the visual focal point of the image in terms of location, sharpness, lighting and exposure – but not in a way that would make them the star of the image, as all the other dished look much more interesting from a culinary POV. --El Grafo (talk) 11:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just too cluttered compositionally. Less would definitely have been more here. Daniel Case (talk) 00:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:View from Stolová hora to the north in the morning.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 16:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Maria Wörth Reifnitz Schloss Klein-Miramar NO-Ansicht 06052019 6802.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 16:44:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:20180819 ReuttenerSeilbahn vorZugspitze blau DSC00935 PtrQs.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 12:50:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Cableways
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by PtrQs - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice minimalistic composition. -- Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mimihitam (talk) 14:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing spectacular here. Seven Pandas (talk) 14:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good quality but I incline to agree with Seven Pandas. It's all a bit empty for me, there's not much tension in the composition. Cmao20 (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Subject in the shadow -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As this picture is generated from a raw file there is almost no limit to highlighting, but a) the gondola is coated by tinted glass, and b) artificially minimizing the constrast would mean to destroy the monochromatic blueish look by flashy red colors. --PtrQs (talk) 23:44, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm not saying you can save this nomination with a better post-processing, unfortunately, this gondola is very dark and thus uninteresting in my view (like this one) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 11:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 03:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the overall effect very much. I don't think it's a problem that the gondola is darker than the background -- which is the real subject. — Rhododendrites talk |  04:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support love the overall effect, gondola is not the object here, but the background with its lovely shades of blue. Renata3 (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The odd position and lighting on the gondola may have been intentional, but it doesn't work fo me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:08, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing stands out to warrant FP. -- Alsakan (talk) 18:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I could see this working as a horizontal ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This composition just does not work on a computer screen. I really dislike it especially in full screen mode. But looking at the thumb on the nomination page made me realize: It needs to be printed large, hung on an otherwise empty white wall and looked at from a distance of at least 3 meters. Perfect for waiting rooms or for relaxing your eyes in the office. Stare at it and get lost in your thoughts. The gondola could be a plain black silhouette and it wouldn't matter. It is not what you're looking at, it's only there to provide an additional layer of depth – and because of that it is positioned exactly where it needs to be. --El Grafo (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support El Grafo's idea finally convinced me. --T.Bednarz (talk) 10:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support how to take great shot in the day of bad atmospheric conditions. --Grtek (talk) 10:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Zitting cisticola feeding its chicks.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 12:22:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • I am talking about halos Cart, not stripes. There is a band of lighter colour surrounding each stem about half the width of the stem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:16, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 03:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  04:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Budi Santoso Adji, Mimihitam, W.carter, Cmao20, King of Hearts, Basile Morin, Palauenc05, Ermell, Meiræ, Rhododendrites: I have already asked for the image quality to be improved, but the photographer is not active here. There is a weakness in third parties nominating images where they have no control over the image they are nominating. We all make mistakes, but nominators should try to verify the accuracy of the subject description before nomination. The birds in this image are incorrectly identified. There are two cisticolas in Indonesia. This is the golden-headed cisticola (Cisticola exilis). Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:49, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp thank you for pointing this out. Shall I change the name of the file then? Mimihitam (talk) 23:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    I would not be happy if someone changed the file name of any of my images. This is for the photographer only who may challenge my id if they wisħ. This is an obvious error and my id in this instance Basile Morin has been validated by one of Asia's top bird experts after I first checked in one of his field guides, but many identifications of LBJs (Little Brown Jobs) are challenging and third parties should in general not correct identifications. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • These two species are very similar. For me the wow is about the situation (not the kind of spectacle you see every day). However, it's important yes that the animals are well identified. It might be fixable. Personally, I can't distinguish both (perhaps a species feeding another one ? 🐥😉) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:38, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles, and the background is noisy, and the highlights on the birds' chest are a bit too bright. Due to the lack of metadata I cannot tell if this was due to technical constraints on the shot or not. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agree with Daniel Poco a poco (talk) 18:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Fin garden ceiling2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 11:45:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

a part of qajar vault in fin garden, kashan, iran

File:Fin garden ceiling.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 11:18:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

ghajar vault of fin garden in kashan, iran

File:Juvenile robin (12336).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 01:37:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a fledgling American robin

File:Home made sour dough bread.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 00:28:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Dandelion Gosling (49922177848).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2020 at 17:47:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Canada gosling eating a dandelion.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Branta
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by K6ka - nominated by 1989 (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 1989 (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Underexposed. -- King of ♥ 19:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose That could be sorted, but it's not very sharp and poor light. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:03, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition, and very cute, but at least half a stop underexposed. Cmao20 (talk) 22:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As the photographer, I have the raw file in case anyone wants to make adjustments to the photo (not required but you're welcome to it). They're available on the Internet Archive. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:28, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose To me, it doesn't need all the extra space; the unsharp areas of the background are somewhat distracting. However, cropping in closer might put the picture under the FP minimum. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- While I see the technical imperfections, it has the wow-factor for me. MartinD (talk) 06:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 15.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2020 at 16:27:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bas-reliefs of Achaemenid warriors at the Southern staircase of Tachara in Persepolis, today Iran.

File:Nosal i widok na Tatry.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2020 at 07:52:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the top of Nosal, Bystra Valley and the Tatras

File:Tiefenstürmig Feuersalamander -20200314-RM-165910.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 30 May 2020 at 15:00:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fire salamander on its way to spawn in a stream in Franconian Switzerland
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Constructive criticism is always welcome--Ermell (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Fascinating creature but I'm not sure of the wisdom of featuring an image where most of the subject is out of focus. I get what you were trying to do, but I don't think it works for me Cmao20 (talk) 21:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The part of the animal that is under water cannot be sharp. Waterfall pictures are also nominated here although everything is out of focus.--Ermell (talk) 22:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The point here is that salamanders are amphibians, i.e. animals who can only reproduce in waters. In my opinion, illuminating that specific aspect and showing the salamander in its habitat outweights the constant desire here on FPC candidates for all parts of an animal being "in focus". High educational value, therefore I support this nomination. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:46, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose An interesting idea, using very low speed, but it leaves nothing in focus. The blurred water doesn't work for me either. Artifical light/flash to allow faster shutter speed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Frank put it very well. --Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles.--Peulle (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cmao20 Poco a poco (talk) 10:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per other opposers. --Cayambe (talk) 06:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:30, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Sturnus vulgaris in england.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 May 2020 at 10:44:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • I don't think is possible....is covered. Thanks --Sonya7iv (talk) 13:28, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Resolution much more impressive here -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • But should that be the primary criterion? A hurdle, of course, but way behind composition. ̴̃Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:10, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 20:55, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The resolution is impressive and surely phones will soon be able to take photos as well, however, the composition is too closed and the piece of trunk is distracting the bottom as well. Size should not be the most important criterion --Wilfredor (talk) 18:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Phones? what are you talking about? however, the photo is certainly well taken from all points of view. Thanks.--Sonya7iv (talk) 22:25, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose per Wilfredor -- Alsakan (talk) 19:44, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just like the ones I can see on my lawn from where I'm sitting ... Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Asian hornet (33283876513) (2).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 May 2020 at 04:45:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Asian hornet


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 28 May 2020 (UTC)



Tabela czasu[edit]

Wed 13 May → Thu 28 May
Thu 14 May → Fri 29 May
Fri 15 May → Sat 30 May
Sat 16 May → Sun 31 May
Sun 17 May → Mon 1 Jun
Mon 18 May → Tue 2 Jun
Tue 19 May → Wed 3 Jun
Wed 20 May → Thu 4 Jun
Thu 21 May → Fri 5 Jun
Fri 22 May → Sat 6 Jun
Sat 23 May → Sun 7 Jun
Sun 24 May → Mon 8 Jun
Mon 25 May → Tue 9 Jun
Tue 26 May → Wed 10 Jun
Wed 27 May → Thu 11 Jun
Thu 28 May → Fri 12 Jun