Commons:Kandydatury do wartościowych grafik

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:
Skip to image nominations Przejdź do nominacji obrazu Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

Crystal Clear mimetype txt2.png Trwa tłumaczenie tej strony z jej angielskiej wersji .

Valued image seal.svg

Tu znajdują się kandydatury do miana wartościowej grafiki. Należy pamiętać, że wartościowa grafika to nie to samo co grafika na medal czy grafika wysokiej jakości. Jeśli potrzebujesz więcej informacji, uzyskasz je na stronie krytyka ~ocena~ grafiki.

Pojedyncza grafika zgłaszana jest do statusu wartościowa grafika (WG) , natomiast seria grafik do statusu zestaw wartościowej grafiki (ZWG) . Kandydatura musi być zgłoszona jako najcenniejsza grafika w określonej kategorii spośród wszystkich w Commons' . Oceny należy dokonać zgodnie z valued image criteria ~kryteriami wartościowej grafiki~.

Procedura rewizji wartościowej grafiki (RWG) zostaje otwarta w sytuacji, gdy dwie lub więcej grafik konkuruje o miano WG lub ZWG w tej samej kategorii.

Zasady zgłaszania kandydatur można znależć na stronie Commons:Valued image candidates/Zasady zgłaszania.

Niezakwalifikowana ~odrzucona/nieprzyjęta~ grafika może zostać ponownie zgłoszona w tej samej kategorii, gdy wszystkie wobec niej zastrzeżenia zostaną skorygowane. Grafika, która została sklasyfikowana jako "undecided" może zostać ponownie zgłoszona w każdej chwili. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image or set for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image or set which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
27,919 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
24,670 (88.4%) 
Undecided
  
1,416 (5.1%) 
Declined
  
1,833 (6.6%) 



New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Liparus Sp 1 MHNT.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2017-10-07 05:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Liparus Coleoptera sex
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Il faut lier avec une catégorie Commons qui existe. La categorie "Liparus" n'existe pas. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The link was red car scope was pointing to a gallery that did not exist. The category exists. I think it would be desirable to give the name of the species. There is no label for the level of the genus --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Désolé, la photo seule n'a pas permis de déterminer l'espèce mais la category Coleoptera sex existe. --Ercé (talk) 06:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question - So what should we do? this photo is clearly useful, but the standard is that unless we know what species the couple is, we can't give it the VI label? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Erste gleichgeschlechtliche Eheschließung am 1. Oktober 2017 36.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
C.Suthorn (talk) on 2017-10-07 06:31 (UTC)
Scope:
First ever Same-sex marriage in Germany
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - We should have a VI for this scope, absolutely. But so far, none of us has felt inspired to look at every photo of the wedding to see which one is best. What makes this one the best? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I did look at all the ones that seem to show this scene and at a 10th of a second they all seemed distorted and none looked better. I wanted to support the scope but I just couldn't get behind it. It wasn't the nominators fault, they didn't take it. I was hoping someone would have an idea on what to do. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Close wing position of Delias belladonna Fabricius, 1793 – Hill Jezebel.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 8 Oct 2017
Scope:
Delias belladonna ithiela (Sikkim Hill Jezebel) ventral

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment excellent but a tighter frame would be perfect. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 03:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
2011-06-15 10 Engelport - Hl. Anna selbdritt.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2017-10-10 13:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Gothic statues of Madonna and Child with Saint Anne in Rhineland-Palatinate – cloister Maria Engelport
Used in:
de:Kloster Maria Engelport, fr:Couvent de Maria Engelport
Reason:
Interesting personation of the adult vergin not bigger than a child -- Lothar Spurzem (talk)
Open for review.
MS Loreley (III)-Variante.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2017-10-10 17:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Loreley (ship, 1963) on Rhine
Used in:
de: Loreley (Schiff, 1963)
Reason:
No good image but the best in scope. I don't remember where exactly I took this photo. It was near Koblenz. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think that it still needs a geo-location. If you can't remember exactly where it was, give an approximate location and add a note of the uncertainty such as "within 50 km of the stated location"). I also suggest that you mention that the ship was sunk in 2002 which is why no more photos of it can be taken. Martinvl (talk) 21:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Thank you. I thought the location must be exactly to a few meters only. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I am happy to support this image as in my view it is the best in Commons for the specified scope and that it mets the six specified criteria for a valued image. (For the record, I added the English language text to the description). Martinvl (talk) 20:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
@Martinvl: Thank you! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:43, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 03:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Hôtel de Flottes de Sébasan.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2017-10-10 20:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel de Flottes de Sébasan, Pézenas
Used in:
Reason:
I believe this is the best image in Commons of this XVth century mansion, now a protected site. -- Martinvl (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I agree, clearly the best. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 03:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Sphecodina abbottii MHNT CUT 2010 0 154 West Feliciana Parish Louisiana Male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-11 04:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Sphecodina abbottii Mounted specimen Male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rio di Ca' Garzon (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-11 04:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Rio de Ca' Garzoni (Venice) seen from Corte Lucatello to the private bridge of Sant'Anzolo

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds Eglise - Maître-autel.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-11 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - Church of St. Martin - The high altar.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 11:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Perpignan St. Mathieu 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2017-10-11 12:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Corbel, dated 1677, at Église Saint-Mathieu de Perpignan, France.
Open for review.
Dantercepies - Upper terminus.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-10-11 15:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Dantercepies aerial cableway, Upper terminus, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Harmoniconus sponsalis 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-10-11 17:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Conus sponsalis (Marriage Cone), shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2017 Dawny kościół ewangelicki w Długopolu-Zdroju 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-11 18:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Former protestant church in Długopole-Zdrój, exposure from SE
Open for review.
2017 Dom zdrojowy w Długopolu-Zdroju 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-11 19:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Spa House in Długopole-Zdrój, exposure from SW
Open for review.
2017 Dworzec kolejowy w Długopolu-Zdroju 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-11 19:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Długopole-Zdrój train station, exposure from W
Open for review.
2017 Dwór barokowy w Długopolu Górnym 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-11 19:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Długopole Górne, exposure from E
Open for review.
2017 Dwór barokowy w Długopolu Górnym 3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-11 19:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Długopole Górne, grille in portal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:29, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ambulyx kuangtungensis MHNT CUT 2010 0 155 Lushan-Spa Nantou Taiwan female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-12 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Ambulyx kuangtungensis Moounted specimen female dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Gregorio (Venise) - apse.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-12 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Church San Gregorio (Venice) viewed from Campo della Salute
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Clearly best in scope. Should "exterior of apse" be specified? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • In fact I have expressed myself badly, it would have been better to say view from (in French vu de or vu depuis because the apside is not on the campo. If you agree I modify the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • So, Church of San Gregorio (Venice), viewed from Campo della Salute? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds Eglise - Le choeur.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-12 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - Le chœur
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
MELLINET, général Emile, Gustave Le Gray GALLICA.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2017-10-12 10:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Émile Mellinet, photograph
Used in:
fr:Émile Mellinet
Reason:
Best resolution and best in scope IMO. Found, uploaded and restored by me. His strange face is due to a blow of a spear during the napoleonic (Napoleon I, 1815) wars. No geocode needed for a studio shot. In use of course. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Mercedes-Benz, IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A3046).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
MB-one (talk) on 2017-10-12 12:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz Concept EQ - rear
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 12:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Bayreuth Markgräfliches Opernhaus Fürstenloge (1995).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2017-10-12 12:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of Markgräfliches Opernhaus Bayreuth – prince box
Used in:
de: Wilhelmine von Preußen (1709–1758), de:Markgräfliches Opernhaus, en: Opera house, ru: Маркграфский театр
Reason:
Probably the best image in the commons from the time bevor Markgräfliches Opernhaus was renovated. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Bangkok, Dystrykt Phra Nakhon, Wat Suthat (34).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2017-10-12 13:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Main temple of Wat Suthat, Bangkok. View from S-W
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in Thailand -- Halavar (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duisburg, Hohenstaufenstraße 38, 2017-08 CN-01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
kaʁstn Dis/Cat on 2017-10-12 15:10 (UTC)
Scope:
House Hohenstaufenstraße 38, Duisburg-Duissern
Used in:
de:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Duisburg-Mitte
Open for review.
Duisburg, Hohenstaufenstraße 52, 2017-08 CN-01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
kaʁstn Dis/Cat on 2017-10-12 15:10 (UTC)
Scope:
House Hohenstaufenstraße 52, Duisburg-Duissern
Used in:
de:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Duisburg-Mitte
Open for review.
Duisburg, Hohenstaufenstraße 55, 2017-08 CN-01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
kaʁstn Dis/Cat on 2017-10-12 15:10 (UTC)
Scope:
House Hohenstaufenstraße 55, Duisburg-Duissern
Used in:
de:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Duisburg-Mitte
Open for review.
Duisburg, Hohenstaufenstraße 57, 2017-08 CN-01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
kaʁstn Dis/Cat on 2017-10-12 15:10 (UTC)
Scope:
House Hohenstaufenstraße 57, Duisburg-Duissern
Used in:
de:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Duisburg-Mitte

Symbol support vote.svg Support Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
32126 St-Maurice, Abteikirche 1990-06-03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2017-10-12 18:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Abbaye de Saint-Maurice d'Agaune – church-tower
Used in:
de: Abtei Saint-Maurice, en: Saint-Maurice, Switzerland en: Abbey of St. Maurice, Agaunum, fa: سن‌موریس, fr: Suisse au Haut Moyen Âge, nl: Abdij van Sint-Mauritius
Reason:
Bad quality but obviously a liked image -- Lothar Spurzem (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Neuberger Münster Innenraum 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2017-10-12 18:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Stift Neuberg an der Mürz - Interior view eastwards to the high altar
Used in:
de:Stift Neuberg, fr:Abbaye de Neuberg

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:23, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2017-01-28 - Carlos Menchaca at the protest at JFK (80836).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rhododendrites talk |  on 2017-10-12 23:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Carlos Menchaca
Used in:
en:Carlos Menchaca, en:LGBT culture in New York City, wikidata:Q16205471
Open for review.
Claude Théodore Decaen - General.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2017-10-12 23:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Claude Decaen, portrait photograph
Used in:
fr:Claude Decaen and others
Reason:
Alone in scope, new category created, uploaded over a bad quality version and low resolution of the same photograph. Restored by me. No geo code for a studio shot. In use of course. This general, killed in action in 1870 Franco-German war, has a street named after him in Paris. -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.
Dark purple Trichoglottis (70213s)c.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rhododendrites talk |  on 2017-10-13 04:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Trichoglottis atropurpurea (Dark Purple Trichoglottis)
Used in:
en:Trichoglottis atropurpurea, wikidata:Q9089855
Open for review.
Ambulyx kuangtungensis MHNT CUT 2010 0 155 Lushan-Spa Nantou Taiwan female ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-13 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Ambulyx kuangtungensis Mounted specimen female ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
San Moisè (Venice) Interno - L'esaltazion della Croce e sant'Elena (Pietro Liberi).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-13 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
L'esaltazion della Croce e sant'Elena by Pietro Liberi, San Moisè (Venice)
Open for review.
Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds Eglise - chaire à prêcher, de style néo-gothique IM31000104.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-13 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, France. The pulpit.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Murals at Dresden Mitte 29.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
C.Suthorn (talk) on 2017-10-13 14:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Murals at Dresden Mitte
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have nothing against the image but can the scope be narrowed? There are many different murals in the category -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Bergüner Stöcke as seen from Fuorcla Cotschna (highres).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Capricorn4049 (talk) on 2017-10-13 16:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Bergüner Stöcke from Oberhalbstein
Open for review.
Piz Alv (Oberhalbsteiner Alpen) Panorama.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Capricorn4049 (talk) on 2017-10-13 17:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Panorama from Piz Alv
Open for review.
Adolf Brudes im BMW 328 Mille Miglia am 14.08.1976.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2017-10-13 17:39 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW 328 in competition driven by Adolf Brudes
Used in:
de: BMW 328, de: Adolf Brudes, de: Fahreignung von Senioren, en: BMW 328, en: Adolf Brudes, en: BMW in motorsport, es: BMW 328, fr: BMW 328, it: BMW 328, nl: BMW 328
Open for review.
Discus rotundatus 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-10-13 18:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Discus rotundatus (Rotund Disc), shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lactuca sativa 'Ashbrook'.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2017-10-13 19:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Lactuca sativa 'Ashbrook'
Open for review.
Renault R4 GTL 1982.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
-- DeFacto (talk). on 2017-10-13 19:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Renault 4 GTL built in Wexford, Ireland - front
Used in:
en:Renault 4, en:Irish Agricultural Museum, en:Automotive industry in Ireland
Reason:
This is an image of one of the few such cars built in Wexford -- -- DeFacto (talk).
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question How can I see that it is one of only few cars from Wexford? Is there any special sign? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
I don't know if there are any differences in the Wexford car, I relied on the museum information board that said this was a Wexford car. -- DeFacto (talk). 22:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
2017 Dwór barokowy w Długopolu Górnym 4.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-13 21:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Długopole Górne, window with grille

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 04:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-13 21:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Hoecker Building, exposure from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 04:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 4.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-13 21:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Hoecker Building, exposure from S
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good image, useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 6.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-13 21:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Hoecker Building, main entrance

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 04:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2017 Kamieniołom piaskowca w Długopolu Górnym 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-13 21:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Sandstone quarry in Długopole Górne
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Klausen 3 - Gnadenbild 15. Jh. .JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2017-10-13 21:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Wallfahrtskirche Klausen – miraculous image, 15. century
Used in:
de:Wallfahrtskirche Maria Heimsuchung (Klausen)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Klausen 2 - Gnadenbild 17. Jh. .JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2017-10-13 21:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Wallfahrtskirche Klausen – miraculous image, 17. century
Used in:
de:Wallfahrtskirche Maria Heimsuchung (Klausen)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Callionima calliomenae MHNT CUT 2010 0 156 Parque Nacional Henri Pitter (Rancho Grande), Venezuela Female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-14 04:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Callionima calliomenae Mounted specimen Female dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Chiesa di San Maurizio - Salterio - Scuola Veniziana - 1700.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-14 04:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Museo della Musica in Venice - Psaltery Venetian School 1700

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds Eglise - Buste-reliquaire de saint Blaise IM31000101.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2017-10-14 04:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, France. Bust-reliquary of Saint Blaise.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The only one in scope and used -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:29, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Thuraya XT-PRO DUAL.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Florian Fuchs (talk) on 2017-10-14 06:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Thuraya satellite phones
Used in:
de:Thuraya, en:Thuraya
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Image is useful and used, but can the scope be narrowed? Possibly with the model number? That would make this best in scope and remove all issues. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Rdeča mušnica (Amanita muscaria).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mile (talk) on 2017-10-14 08:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Amanita muscaria var. aureola
Used in:
Amanita muscaria var. aureola, Muhara
Reason:
good macro shot -- Mile (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No question this is great and I'm a bit surprised there isn't a single VI in a category of over 900 images already. My question to myself is does this image represent all Amanita Muscaria var. Aureola. It could absolutely but should it? Do you think this should be the VI for all of Amanita Muscaria var. Aureola or should the scope be changed to add something along the lines of Immature fruiting body? I could see it both ways really. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:17, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Mallet-Lok 11sm (2015-10-04 4198b) Brohltalbahn.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2017-10-14 09:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Mallet lokomotive 11sm – front
Used in:
de:Maschinenbauanstalt Humboldt, en:Maschinenbau Anstalt Humboldt
Reason:
Lokomotive from 1906 after restauration -- Lothar Spurzem (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in Scope and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Open for review.
Mallet-Lok 11sm (2015-10-04 4191) Brohltalbahn.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2017-10-14 09:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Mallet lokomotive 11sm – rear
Open for review.
Mallet-Lok 11sm (2015-10-04 4265) Typenschild.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2017-10-14 11:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Mallet lokomotive 11sm – Manufacturer's plate
Used in:
de:Maschinenbauanstalt Humboldt, en:Maschinenbau Anstalt Humboldt

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Mallet-Lok 11sm (2015-10-04 4305) in Niederzissen.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2017-10-14 11:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Mallet lokomotive 11sm with railway carriages

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cymbospondylus - Seceda.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-10-14 17:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Cymbospondylus spec., Seceda specimen

Pictogram voting info.svg Info For detailed data and original description see here. As the head is not known, the exact species is not identifiable (Info by the Museum).

Open for review.
Tritia colorata vindobonensis 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2017-10-14 17:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Tritia colorata ssp. vindobonensis, shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Open for review.
2017 Dwór empirowy w Długopolu Górnym 9.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-14 19:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Hoecker Building, oculli
Open for review.
2017 Kaplica cmentarna w Długopolu Górnym 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-14 19:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saints Peter and Paul in Długopole Górne, cemetery chapel, exposure from S
Open for review.
2017 Kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Długopolu Górnym 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-14 19:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saints Peter and Paul in Długopole Górne, exposure from SW
Open for review.
2017 Kościół św. Józefa w Ponikwie 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-14 19:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Joseph church in Ponikwa, portal
Open for review.
2017 Kawczak, Trzcińska Góra i Żeleźniak, Góry Bystrzyckie, Sudety.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2017-10-14 19:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Góry Bystrzyckie, Kawczak, Trzcińska Góra and Żeleźniak
Open for review.



Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%B2_%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F&action=edit