Commons:Kandydatury do wartościowych grafik

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:

English | فارسی | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Przejdź do nominacji obrazu Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

Crystal Clear mimetype txt2.png Trwa tłumaczenie tej strony z jej angielskiej wersji .

Valued image seal.svg

Tu znajdują się kandydatury do miana wartościowej grafiki. Należy pamiętać, że wartościowa grafika to nie to samo co grafika na medal czy grafika wysokiej jakości. Jeśli potrzebujesz więcej informacji, uzyskasz je na stronie krytyka ~ocena~ grafiki.

Pojedyncza grafika zgłaszana jest do statusu wartościowa grafika (WG) , natomiast seria grafik do statusu zestaw wartościowej grafiki (ZWG) . Kandydatura musi być zgłoszona jako najcenniejsza grafika w określonej kategorii spośród wszystkich w Commons' . Oceny należy dokonać zgodnie z valued image criteria ~kryteriami wartościowej grafiki~.

Procedura rewizji wartościowej grafiki (RWG) zostaje otwarta w sytuacji, gdy dwie lub więcej grafik konkuruje o miano WG lub ZWG w tej samej kategorii.

Zasady zgłaszania kandydatur można znależć na stronie Commons:Valued image candidates/Zasady zgłaszania.

Niezakwalifikowana ~odrzucona/nieprzyjęta~ grafika może zostać ponownie zgłoszona w tej samej kategorii, gdy wszystkie wobec niej zastrzeżenia zostaną skorygowane. Grafika, która została sklasyfikowana jako "undecided" może zostać ponownie zgłoszona w każdej chwili. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image or set for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image or set which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
21,620 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
18,816 (87%) 
Undecided
  
1,186 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
1,618 (7.5%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Tombes japonaises - 04 - 2016-04-30.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mathieu MD (talk) on 2016-06-19 17:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Graves in Ishikawa prefecture (Japan)
Open for review.
Church of Saint Seraphim of Sarov (Novy Urengoy).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
MartynovRussia (talk) on 2016-06-20 21:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Novy Urengoy, Church of Saint Seraphim of Sarov.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Most of the side of the church has covered behind the trees. Need sufficient view. ~ Moheen (talk) 14:58, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Declined if the last vote was added no later than 20:33, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Winter (Novy Urengoy).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
MartynovRussia (talk) on 2016-06-20 21:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Novy Urengoy, Central Square in Winter.
Open for review.
Epiphany Cathedral (Novy Urengoy).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
MartynovRussia (talk) on 2016-06-20 21:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Novy Urengoy, Epiphany Cathedral.
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Image is too much tilt. ~ Moheen (talk) 14:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Declined if the last vote was added no later than 20:33, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Red and blue pill.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
w.carter-Talk on 2016-06-21 10:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Red or blue pill
Used in:
en:Choice, en:Red pill and blue pill, es:Píldora roja y píldora Azul, he:ויקיפדיה:המקבץ השבועי/בחירות, it:Matrix, uk:Червона і синя таблетки
Open for review.
Pompeï.- La maison du Faune « Combat entre les Grecs et les Perses ».jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2016-06-21 21:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Replica of the Battle of Issus mosaic (in Pompeii) The House of the Faun

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Callionima falcifera MHNT CUT 2010 0 40 Puente national Vera Cruz Mexico male dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-22 05:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Callionima falcifera mounted specimen male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Porta Borsari (Verona).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-22 05:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Porta Borsari in Verona. Face on Corso Cavour

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duomo (Treviso) - interior - Nave - porch.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-22 05:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Treviso Cathedral - the old roman porch of the cathedral.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Turtle egg kota bharu.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Triton (talk) on 2016-06-22 08:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Turtle eggs as food
Used in:
en:Sea turtle
Reason:
I haven't seen any picture of sea turtle sold. Seems to me it's a good illustrations of the commercialisation of this species. don't think it's a quality picture but look valuable enough. -- Triton (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Średniak i Smrekowiec.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-06-22 13:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Śnieżnik Mountains, Średniak and Smrekowiec

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Żmijowiec i Czarna Góra.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-06-22 13:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Śnieżnik Mountans, Żmijowiec and Czarna Góra

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Volva habei 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-06-22 20:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Volva habei, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Grave of John, Ester and Bengt Bauer-2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
w.carter-Talk on 2016-06-22 21:17 (UTC)
Scope:
John Bauer's grave
Used in:
en:Ester Ellqvist

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Callionima falcifera MHNT CUT 2010 0 40 Puente national Vera Cruz Mexico male ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-23 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Callionima falcifera mounted specimen male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:33, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Beaumont-de-Lomagne - Eglise Notre-Dame de l'Assomption - Clocher.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-23 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Notre-Dame de Beaumont-de-Lomagne Tarn-et-Garonne, France - Bell tower

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Erizzo a San Martino (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-23 05:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace Erizzo in Venice. Facade on Rio Ca' di Dio.

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:29, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hamburg, Denkmal -Madonna der Seefahrt- -- 2016 -- 3070.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2016-06-23 17:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Madonna der Seefahrt (or "Madonna der Meere") at Fischmarkt Hamburg-Altona (St.-Pauli-Fischmarkt) in Hamburg, Germany
Used in:
de:Madonna der Meere

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Wasserschloss -- 2016 -- 2951.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
XRay talk on 2016-06-23 17:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Wasserschloss (view from the „Poggenmühlenbrücke“), Speicherstadt, Hamburg, Germany
Used in:
de:Speicherstadt

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bollendorf muehle.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-06-23 18:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Historical mill (18th ctry.) in Bollendorf, Germany.
Used in:
de:Liste der Kulturdenkmäler in Bollendorf

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ichneumon wasp (Echthrus reluctator) female.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-06-23 20:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Echthrus reluctator (Ichneumon wasp) female, lateral view

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Adonis blue (Polyommatus bellargus) female underside ab. obsoleta.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-06-23 20:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Polyommatus bellargus (Adonis blue) female, ventral, aberration obsoleta

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Adonis blue (Polyommatus bellargus) female.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-06-23 20:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Polyommatus bellargus (Adonis blue) female, dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Guemar fountain.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-06-23 20:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Fountain in Guémar, France.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Mostowicach 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-06-23 21:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Mostowice, exposure from S

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża Świętego w Rudawie 06.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-06-23 21:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Exaltation of the Holy Cross church in Rudawa, exposure from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Callionima falcifera MHNT CUT 2010 0 40 Mazatlán Mexico female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-24 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Callionima falcifera mounted specimen female dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duomo (Treviso) - interior - Nave - tympanum of the porch.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-24 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Treviso Cathedral - Tympanum of the old roman porch of the cathedral

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 05:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Zelarino - Parrocchia Maria Immacolata e San Vigilio - Il monumento ai caduti.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-24 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Zelarino Church Maria Immacolata e San Vigilio

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 05:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
European robin (Erithacus rubecula) juvenile.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-06-24 09:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Erithacus rubecula (European robin) juvenile

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) juvenile 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-06-24 09:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Aegithalos caudatus (Long-tailed tit) juvenile

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Garden chafer beetle (Phyllopertha horticola).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-06-24 09:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Phyllopertha horticola (Garden chafer beetle)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Helicigona lapicida andorrica 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-06-24 20:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Helicigona lapicida ssp. andorrica (Andorran Stone-loving Arianta), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Santa Paula'.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2016-06-25 05:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Santa Paula' Flowers.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Callionima falcifera MHNT CUT 2010 0 40 Mazatlán Mexico female ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-25 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Callionima falcifera mounted specimen female ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 08:32, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duomo (Treviso) - interior - Nave - Saint John the Baptist by Alessandro Vittoria.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-25 05:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Treviso Cathedral - Saint John the Baptist by Alessandro Vittoria

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:29, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ponte Canal (Santa Croce).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-06-25 05:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte Canal in Venice - south exposure

Please check category. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:28, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Andlau Puits Sainte Richarde.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-06-25 08:16 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Richarde Well (1513) in Andlau, France.
Used in:
Andlau
Reason:
The only image showing the entire monument. -- Palauenc05 (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:26, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Andlau tour sorciéres.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-06-25 09:15 (UTC)
Scope:
The "Witches' Tower", Andlau (15th ctry.), France.
Used in:
Andlau

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Colmar inscription bistrot koifhus.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-06-25 20:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Inscription plate in Rue des Marchands, Colmar, France.
Open for review.



Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%B2_%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F&action=edit