Commons:Photography critiques

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
COM:CRIT
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 90 days.

color palette logo Welcome to the Photography critiques!

Would you like a second opinion before nominating a photograph of yours as a Quality Image, Valued Image or Featured Picture candidate, can't decide which of your images to enter into one of the Photo Challenges? Or do you have specific questions about how to improve your photography or just would like some general feedback?

This is the right page to gather other people's opinions!




If you want general suggestions to a good photo, you can ask here, and we already wrote guidelines.

See image guidelines >>

If you don't get some terminology used here, don't be shy you can ask about it, or read

See photography terms >>

Please insert new entries at the bottom, and comment on oldest entries first.

To prevent archiving use {{subst:DNAU}}, because SpBot archives all sections after 90 days, unless archiving has been postponed or suppressed through the use of {{subst:DNAU}}. You can ask the bot to archive a section earlier by using {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} – then it will be archived after 7 days.



Archive


Qasem Soleimani[edit]

Memorial ceremony of Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani at Beit Rahbari 09.jpg

Any chance for FP at Commons or Wikipedia? 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Too week, this is a snapshot. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 16:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Quality-wise, it isn't too shoddy, but the composition is a little tight so I'd say that that would be an issue. ― Gerifalte Del Sabana 02:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
@廣九直通車: I prefer this for VI. pandakekok9 07:14, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Corvus splendens headshot @ Kuala Lumpur, March 2019.jpg[edit]

Corvus splendens headshot @ Kuala Lumpur, March 2019.jpg

Was just browsing through my old bird pictures (admiring the crows haha) when I came across this one. I'm not sure if I've previously uploaded it here and then deleted it, but nonetheless, the thought occurred to me that I should put it through Topaz Gigapixel and see how it fared. I cropped it a bit and did some minor editing. Do you reckon it could make FPC or even POTY (hah)? Pinging User:Ikan Kekek, User:Charlesjsharp, and User:W.carter for your opinions. :) ― Gerifalte Del Sabana 08:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

I don't think so. The front half of the beak and the food are unsharp merely at full page on my 13-inch laptop's screen. Topaz Gigapixel just upscales, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, no. Both beak and back of head out of focus and processing has not been effective - lots of halos. Gigapixel does not improve an image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
The Topaz superresolution has caused a lot of haloing like Charles mentioned, and also wormy artifacts in the background. It does not look good upon close inspection. dllu (t,c) 20:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)