Commons:Propositions d'images remarquables

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Les règles des Propositions d'images remarquables ont changé.
Conformément aux règles générales, une image est promue avec 7 (sept) votes "support" ou plus (et un ratio de 2/1 de # supports/opposes) et le nombre de nominations actives par utilisateur est limité à 2 (deux)
Désormais, seuls peuvent voter les membres inscrits depuis plus de 10 jours ayant procédé à au moins 50 interventions dans "Commons"


Skip to current candidates Aller directement aux propositions en cours

Cette page recense les images qui sont proposées pour être affichées dans les Images remarquables. Notez qu'il ne s'agit pas de la même chose que l'image du jour ou que les images de qualité.

Les archives des votes précédents se trouvent sur cette page.

Il existe également une liste chronologique des images remarquables.

Voir aussi les Images de qualité, les propositions d'images de qualité et les critiques photographiques.

Procédure[edit]

Conseils avant de proposer une image[edit]

partie en cours de traduction depuis la version anglaise, votre avis est le bienvenu.
Lisez entièrement le guide avant de commencer
Quelques règles informelles à retenir avant de proposer une image (les termes en italiques sont la traduction anglaise des termes).

  • Définition (display resolution) : les images de Commons peuvent être utilisées sur d'autres supports qu'un écran d'ordinateur, par exemple pour être imprimées ou vues à très haute résolution. Il est important que les images proposées aient la plus haute résolution possible. Au moins 2 millions de pixels (par ex. 2000 x 1000) semble raisonnable à présent. Les images de résolution inférieure sont systématiquement rejetées sauf s'il y a une bonne raison.
  • Mise au point (focus) : tous les objets importants de l'image devraient être nets.
  • Avant-plan et arrière-plan (background and foreground): ils peuvent être dérangeants. Le sujet principal ne devrait pas être caché par le premier plan, ni se confondre avec l'arrière-plan.
  • Qualité générale (general quality) : Les images proposées devraient avoir une très haute qualité technique.
  • Une retouche (digital manipulations) ne doit pas tromper l'observateur. La correction de quelques défauts dans l'image est acceptée pour autant que ce soit limité, bien fait, et non pour tromper. Les retouches courantes sont le recadrage, la correction de la perspective, de netteté, des couleurs ou de l'exposition. Des manipulations plus importantes, tels quel l'élimination d'éléments dans l'arrière plan, doivent être décrites dans la description de l'image, par le biais du modèle {{RetouchedPicture}}. Les retouches non décrites ou mal décrites qui transformeraient le sujet sont inacceptables.
  • Utilité (value) : notre but principal est de présenter des images utiles et précieuses. Les images devraient ainsi être spéciales d'une façon ou d'une autre, donc, entre autres :
    • La plupart des coucher de soleil sont beaux, et la plupart ne sont pas différents des autres existant déjà.
    • Les photos de nuit sont souvent belles mais davantage de détails sont visibles de jour.
    • "Beau" ne veut pas dire "utile".

Au niveau technique, nous avons l'exposition, la composition, le mouvement et la profondeur du champ.

  • L'exposition (exposure) est l'obturation du diaphragme qui modifie la luminosité (brightness) pour rendre avec qualité les ombres et les lumières au sein de l'image. Le manque d'ombres dans le détail n'est pas nécessairement négatif, cela peut être un effet désiré.
  • La composition (composition) est l'arrangement des éléments dans l'image. La "Règle de trois" est un bon guide pour la composition, c'est un héritage des écoles de peintures. L'idée est de diviser l'image par deux lignes horizontales et deux lignes verticales, nous avons donc trois parties dans chaque sens. L'objet ne doit pas forcément être centré. Les sujets intéressants doivent êtres placés aux 4 croisements des lignes. L'horizon ne doit jamais être mis au milieu, car il couperait l'image en deux. L'idée principale ici est de rendre l'image dynamique.
  • Netteté (sharpness) renvoie à la manière dont les mouvements sont représentés dans l'image. Ils peuvent être nets ou flous. Ils ne sont pas mieux l'un que l'autre, cela dépend de l'intention du photographe. L'impression de mouvement dépend des différents objets de l'image. Par exemple, photographier une voiture de course qui apparaît nette par rapport à l'arrière plan ne donne pas une idée de la vitesse. Il faudrait en fait que la voiture soit représentée nette, mais avec un arrière plan flou, créant ainsi le mouvement. D'un autre coté, représenter le saut d'un joueur de basket net avec le reste de l'image flou, en raison de la nature peu habituelle de la photo, lui conférerait de l'intérêt.
  • La profondeur de champ (depth of field or DOF) renvoie à la zone de mise au point devant et au delà du sujet principal. La profondeur de champ est choisie en fonction des besoins spécifiques à chaque image. Une profondeur grande ou petite peu améliorer ou dégrader la qualité de l'image. Une faible profondeur de champ peu attirer l'attention sur le sujet principal, en le séparant de son environnement. Le lentilles à petite distance focale (grand angle) ont une grande profondeur de champ, et vice versa, les lentilles à grande distance focale (petite ouverture) ont une petite profondeur de champ.

Proposition[edit]

Si vous pensez avoir trouvé ou créé une image qui puisse être considérée comme parmi les meilleures de Commons, avec une description et une licence appropriée, copiez le nom de l'image dans la boîte ci-dessous (en incluant le préfixe File:), après le texte déjà présent :


Après cela, vous devrez insérer un lien vers la page que vous venez de créer en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Vote[edit]

A l'exclusion de tous autres, vous pouvez utiliser les modèles suivants:

  • {{Pour}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Contre}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),

Ainsi que :

  • {{Neutre}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram voting question.svg Question).


IMPORTANT: veuillez notamment NE PAS UTILISER les modèles {{weak support}} (GA candidate.svg Weak support) ni {{weak oppose}} (BA candidate.svg Weak oppose), ils ne sont pas reconnus par le robot, et votre vote serait considéré comme non valide.

Merci d'inclure quelques mots expliquant pourquoi vous soutenez ou non la promotion de l'image, surtout si vous votez contre. N'oubliez pas de signer avec ~~~~.

Règles[edit]

Règles générales[edit]

  1. Le résultat est donné 9 jours après la proposition (voir le planning en bas de page). Les votes ajoutés le 10e jour ou après ne sont pas décomptés.
  2. Les utilisateurs non-enregistrés peuvent proposer des images, faire des commentaires, mais pas voter.
  3. La proposition elle-même ne compte pas comme un vote : il faut l'ajouter explicitement.
  4. Le proposant peut retirer une image à tout moment, en écrivant I withdraw my nomination.
  5. Souvenez-vous que le but de Wikimedia Commons est une bibliothèque pour tous les projets Wikimedia, y compris des projets futurs ; les images n'ont pas à être utiles uniquement pour Wikipédia.
  6. Les images peuvent être retirées de la liste dès le 5e jour si elles n'ont reçu aucun vote "pour".
  7. Soyez attentifs et très sélectifs dans les choix que vous faites, car il ne peut y avoir que deux propositions actives par proposant. Toute proposition supplémentaire sera rejetée sans examen.
  8. Seulement 2 nominations actives par même utilisateur (qui est, en nomination sous "review" et non encore close) sont autorisées. Le principal but de cette mesure est de contribuer à une meilleure qualité moyenne des nominations, par un choix plus judicieux des photos présentes en nominations.

Règles de promotion[edit]

L'image candidate devient une image remarquable si elle remplit les conditions suivantes :

  1. Une licence appropriée (bien sûr !)
  2. Au moins sept votes "pour".
  3. un ratio de 2/1 de votes "pour"/"contre".
  4. Deux versions différentes de la même image ne peuvent pas être promues en même temps, mais seulement celle avec le plus grand score.

Contestations[edit]

Avec le temps, les critères d'évaluation évoluent, et il peut être décidé qu'une image qui était auparavant assez bonne pour être dans la liste ne peut plus l'être.

Pour qu'une image soit déchue, il faut qu'une majorité de 2/3 avec au moins 5 votes accepte de retirer l'image, autrement elle reste "remarquable". Pour voter, utiliser les modèles {{Keep}} (Symbol keep vote.svg Keep : mérite de rester "remarquable") ou {{Delist}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist  : ne mérite plus le label).

Pour contester une image, copiez son nom avec le préfixe dans la boîte ci-dessous à la suite du texte déjà présent :


Vous devriez inclure les informations suivantes :

  • Informations sur l'origine de l'image (créateur, importateur).
  • Un lien vers le vote d'origine.
  • La raison pour laquelle vous contestez le label, avec votre signature.

Insérez ensuite un lien en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.

Sommaire[edit]

Contents

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste[edit]

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste, cliquez ici et ajoutez votre proposition en haut de la liste : {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}

Propositions en cours[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Steinway & Sons upright piano, model 1098, manufactured at Steinway's factory in New York City.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2014 at 21:48:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Upright piano made in the United States

File:Tartu raudteejaama veetorn, 2010.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2014 at 19:33:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water tower at Tartu railway station

File:Jacques-Louis David - The Emperor Napoleon in His Study at the Tuileries - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2014 at 16:41:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jacques-Louis David - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Claus -- Claus (talk) 16:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus (talk) 16:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The Google Art Project image slightly better than the NGA high resolution image. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 21:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:La Vierge au voile, by Raffaello Sanzio, from C2RMF retouched.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2014 at 16:36:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Raphael - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by Claus -- Claus (talk) 16:36, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus (talk) 16:36, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Looks to me a copy of the VintPrint poster. The restoration is not documented and it looks pretty inauthentic to me. I really can't support this. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 21:44, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
    • A copy of the VintPrint poster??? Please see the source or the filename.--Claus (talk) 02:33, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
      • Coat, I'd be willing to bet my house that VintPrint downloaded the full image from here and is marketing prints derived from (if not the exact same as) this file. I know DCoetzee's work, and I know how exacting he can be (check out his upload of the Mona Lisa). This file is definitely from C2RMF. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I love this image and the resolution it's in. Perhaps not as famous as the Mona Lisa, but to me the painting is well composed and interesting. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Nave of the Ste Cécile Cathedral - 2014-02-22.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2014 at 14:26:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nave and Ceiling of the Cathedral Ste Cécile in Albi, France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info HDR interior of Albi's cathedral in France. It is said to be a very simple cathedral without lots of details and ornaments in order to convinced the unfaithfuls. — (c/u/n) all by PierreSelim -- PierreSelim (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PierreSelim (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ccw tilt and underexposure should be fixed at least. On a personal taste, The perspective is quite interesting, but I would try to fix verticals, and crop most of the top if necessary. The star here is the rood screen, I wouldn't take the viewer's eyes away from it. (message personnel, si tu as une photo haute résolution prise du même endroit, de la partie inférieure gauche, je suis très intéressé pour boucher un trou d'un panorama que j'ai pris de ce même Jubé il y a 6 ans ! Je n'ai rien trouvé sur Gogole... ) - Benh (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Happy to support if some the technical considerations above are addressed, and on this occasion certainly the tilt. Metadata doesn't indicate any digital processing at all. It could benefit from some. Not sure I would want to see the top cropped. That's one of the most interesting thing about the image, which is generally extremely fine I think and should meet the criteria if some work is done on it. 16:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Veluwse Papiermolen in het Openluchtmuseum van Arnhem.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 22:55:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dutch papermill from 1654 on display in the Arnhem open air museum.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Uberprutser - uploaded by Uberprutser - nominated by [[User:Uberprutser}|]] -- Uberprutser (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uberprutser (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Some time ago I tried to get this version featured but unfortunately a lot of people disliked the cut of reflection. So is this one better? --Uberprutser (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Haven't looked at the original, but this is absolutely beautiful. High, high praise. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 01:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice comp but looks definitely overexposed to me (right side of building). Top/bottom crop very tight while too much empty space on the right, maybe portrait orientation or square framing would have done better. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You say nice comp but then start to complain about empty space and a tight crop, aren't those mutually exclusive? If I had under exposed the image chances are you would complain about noise in the shadow areas. Your own eyes would have had a hard time seeing some details on the right side of the building. So a view overexposed patches seem rather natural to me. Sigh. --Uberprutser (talk) 12:18, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


Alternative:

Dutch papermill from 1654 on display in the Arnhem open air museum.

File:Paris Canal St-Martin écluses Récollets 2013.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 18:52:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Canal St-Martin, Paris.

File:Scharfer Korkstacheling Hydnellum peckii jung.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 17:33:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too dark and hardly any subject isolation. --Uberprutser (talk) 18:05, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Alise-Sainte-Reine statue Vercingetorix par Millet large.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 12:03:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Chateau Luynes.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 11:57:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Myrabella - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 12:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 13:30, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think it's shot (cropped) a bit to tight. --Uberprutser (talk) 14:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I uploaded sharper version. Please revert, if it's not better. --Ivar (talk) 16:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 17:17, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 22:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support @Tomer T: Once again, thank you so much, Tomer! @Iifar: Yes, I find it better with your editing, thank you! I am used to be light with sharpening (if any) but your edit is perfectly fine by me. --Myrabella (talk) 08:57, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:36, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Lilium bulbiferum var. bulbiferum 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 10:19:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fire lily (Lilium bulbiferum var. bulbiferum)

File:VIS - Vienna Independent Shorts 2014 Stadtkino Künstlerhaus Jennifer Reeder.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 09:20:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Filmmaker Jennifer Reeder at film festival Vienna Independent Shorts 2014
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by Tsui -- Tsui (talk) 09:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tsui (talk) 09:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support it seems a bit dark at low resolution, but very nice at full, I like very much the DoF and the focus point -- Christian Ferrer Talk 10:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Sukhoi SuperJet 100 (5114478300).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 04:53:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment 10.664 MP, 2.6 MB → can't see anything wrong with that? --El Grafo (talk) 17:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --El Grafo (talk) 17:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fantastic to see others seeing SuperJet International's photos are featured quality. Can only support this too. russavia (talk) 17:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 08:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Mary, Queen of Scots after Nicholas Hilliard.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2014 at 22:48:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Photo, painting of Mary, Queen of Scots

talk) 22:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I uploaded Hilliards's miniature of Queen Elizabeth I to Commons myself earlier this year. There seems to me to be a couple of issues here: 1 this is a Coetzee bequest image. I'm not sure it's best diplomatic we nominate these images as "Featured" right now 2 are we really going to list every high resolution image of a work of art as "Featured"? They must now run into their tens of thousands if we take account of Google Art Project and galleries such as NGA Washington, Rijksmuseum, and the Prado, to name but just three that come to mind that make available high resolution images, and then both the major auctioneers and others, as well as a host of smaller institutions who take no special steps against stitching their high resolution tiles. I'm inclined to think we should up the bar for art works to "ultra high resolution", such as this one, a van Gogh Sunflowers I recently nominated at Wikipedia Featured Pictures. One interesting thing about Google Art Project images is that fine as they are, they rarely approach the best available from their source museums. This is so for the van Gogh I nominated. That one comes from the Van Gogh Museum as you can readily check by going to the appropriate museum page. It's much superior to the Google Art project version. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 23:45, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:01 Antequera, Andalusia, Spain.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2014 at 16:30:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Royal Collegiate Church of Santa María la Mayor in Antequera, Andalusia, Spain with view of Antequera town on the right.
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Royal Collegiate Church of Santa María la Mayor in Antequera, Andalusia, Spain with view of Antequera town on the right, created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 16:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC) (renomination after I accidentally added three active nominations)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tupungato (talk) 16:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine image. No boring straight form the front shot. Although some of the white buildings seem to be a bit overexposed. But thats fine since human eyes probably would have a hard time seeing any details under similar lighting conditions. --Baykedevries (talk) 17:28, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Budapest, St. Stephen's Basilica C12.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2014 at 02:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Stephen's Basilica in Budapest, Hungary
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by CLI - nominated by Nikhil -- Nikhil (talk) 02:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nikhil (talk) 02:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent (BTW, this is marked with a tag suggesting it was taken in the U.S. Perhaps that could be corrected). Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In recent times we had a lot of nominations of church windows (party techincally at a very high level). My everlasting problem with such nominations is, that the personal contribution of the photographer is difficult to recognize in that case. From a technical perspective the photo here is imho only average. It looks rather soft and on the left side there are bright border areas which are distracting. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:10, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Agreed with Tuxyso, and I’d like the sides to be vertical (if they are in reality as I suppose). --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 07:35, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Splendid image. Stained glass an accepted 2-D category on Commons. Can't follow "personal contribution". Of course if the editor knows it's not a faithful representation, that's another matter. No reason to suppose that is so here. Straight enough for me. Perfectly straight probably too straight. All these fantastically straight images ultimately tedious IMHO. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 08:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent photo of a beautiful object. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 06:17, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kolonáda na Rajstně (Reistenkolonnade) - by Pudelek.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2014 at 22:21:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reistna colonnade, Valtice (Feldsberg), Czech Republic

File:Sarah Vaughan - William P. Gottlieb - No. 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2014 at 21:02:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sarah Vaughan
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by William P. Gottlieb - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Last nomination got six out of the seven supports needed for a quorum. As it is featured on four different Wikipedias, I suspect it's suited for Commons as well, despite the minor flaws of a candid photograph. And it's taken by a notable photographer, so that's a plus. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yes, and a very striking portrait. Lovely. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The flying saucer that is trying to kidnap her is rather distracting. Would editing that out affect EV? Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:10, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
I would support editing it out providing it's a documented separate file linked to the original. I'm not sure it can be within the guidelines. And besides maybe she was really being 'lifted'... It is pretty intrusive I have to admit. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 08:07, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
It's something I'd like to remove, but which would be misleading to. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Misleading to whom? No one would care, as the image is about her not some murky prop in the background. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:5 boerenzwaluwen op een rijtje.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2014 at 20:32:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

5 young barn swallows sitting in a nest that was build in a birdwatchers shed.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by baykedevries - uploaded by baykedevries - nominated by baykedevries -- Baykedevries (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Baykedevries (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very "lucky" moment regarding the arrangement of the chicks and good composition. I do not like the frontal flash light and the background though, sorry. Still a nice shot though. --Slaunger (talk) 21:05, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree, the flash light is a bit harsh. But it was very dark in the shed, the camera had a hard time focusing, and the build in flash was all I had. Maybe I should get one of those softboxes that fit over the build in flash, that shouldn't take up much room in my small camera bag. Next nesting season I will be prepared :) --Baykedevries (talk) 13:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Good idea! For a related FP pose check this gem, especially the detail about the fifth friend gone missing:-) --Slaunger (talk) 14:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment High praise, doesn't quite make the cut for me. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 01:32, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Graphium 19:46, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 20:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Monumento a la Libertad, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 13.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2014 at 19:50:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Freedom Monument is a memorial honouring soldiers killed during the Latvian War of Independence (1918–1920) located in Riga, capital of Latvia. The 42m high monument is considered an important symbol of the freedom, independence, and sovereignty of Latvia. It was unveiled in 1935 and is made of granite, travertine and copper.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Freedom Monument is a memorial honouring soldiers killed during the Latvian War of Independence (1918–1920) located in Riga, capital of Latvia. The 42m high monument is considered an important symbol of the freedom, independence, and sovereignty of Latvia. It was unveiled in 1935 and is made of granite, travertine and copper. This is a re-nomination (see first one here) after having addressed the mentioned issues back then. All by me, Poco2 19:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 19:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's a fine image and I'm happy to support editors who make the effort to upload their images. I do get all that stuff about saturation and frankly I don't give give a damn. And that sky is gorgeous. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 00:17, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment How about FoP in this case? Latvia is not the "FoPest" place on Earth :) --Kikos (talk) 04:49, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
    We are lucky in this case. Kārlis Zāle, the author of the work, died in 1942, and therefore more than 70 years ago (see section 36 of the latvian copyright law) Poco2 08:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request @Poco a poco: could you please note that for future reference somewhere at the file description page (+ maybe at the main category)? Thanks, --El Grafo (talk) 12:45, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
    Good idea, ✓ Done Poco2 21:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 14:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 10:48, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Toris inari 7.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2014 at 11:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Pundit - I got absolutely fascinated by this shrine complex in Fushimi Inari Torii in Kyoto. What do you think? -- Pundit (talk) 11:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as nom/creator. Pundit (talk) 12:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good solution to what is evidently quite a difficult composition judging from the category. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 17:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm supporting everything orange today.

Good luck. I'll be watching myself. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 17:51, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice comp, but the green leaves outside look heavily and unnaturally oversaturated to me. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 19:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Massively oversaturated (take a look on the histrogram of the red chanel), perspective issues. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
So is Van Gogh's Sunflowers. What exactly is the perspective issue here? It's 18mm on a f3.5 lens, pretty standard. Looks fine to me. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 08:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Take a look at the bottom of the columns at the left side - they look rather distorted. The columns are not fully straight in real but also not that converging as the photo implies (take a look on other photos in the same catgegory). But the main reason for my oppose is the massively blown red channel not the perspective. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Colors are definitely in vivid mode and may be overdone, I'm curious though what could I have possibly do better next time to make the columns more straight? Do you think that the lenses distorted the actual view? Pundit (talk) 09:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Have you used a tripod in combination with a leveler? Have you done any perspective corrections on the computer or is the photo "out of the cam"? --Tuxyso (talk) 11:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
I have Nikon Capture NX2 and it's default Distortion control of 10% has a barely noticeable effect on the image. The saturation isn't "massive". It's comfortably within 10% in NX2 I would say and a glance at the category confirms the image is not deceiving the viewer, the FP criterion. There's no such thing as the "right" image in photography (lesson 1) and I'm worried that criticism at this level might be alienating ordinary contributors with realtively unsophisticated equipment or resources. It's essentially elitist in my view, and while it has it may have place amongst established contributors of images on Commons, I do think we should be wary of discouraging new contributors. The image looks great. End of. And my comment about composition is quite right, as you can readily confirm looking through the category. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 14:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
There’s no such thing as "the image looks great" (lesson 2), it just may look great for you. Please allow others to have entirely different views and opinions. And de gustibus non est disputandum. For instance, I don’t approve of candy colours at all. My nomination of Pen-y-ghent from the east looks great too for me, but nobody seems to like it. So what? --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 14:21, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Called "wow" here (lesson 3, there really is such a thing). You're not raising issues of taste but technical matters as if they preclude nomination prima facie . And of your two nominations of Pen-y-ghent I supported the first but not the second from the east, which is quite ordinary lacking all wow. What I didn't do was post an "oppose" saying it was nothing special in my own view and opinion to which I'm surely entitled. I would only do that, and probably as a comment, if I felt the image was receiving inordinate praise. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 17:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
No perspective corrections or tripod, I leaned the camera on one of the poles of stability. Pundit (talk) 11:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Colors are over saturated and when you tilt the lens you will gets perspective distortion. When it looks good, what's the problem? Seems like that perspective is the new noise to complain about. --Baykedevries (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it. --Baykedevries (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Despite the very short description? :-P --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
You're right. I apologize for my rant and inconsistencies. I'll try to do better. --Baykedevries (talk) 17:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strong oversaturation, perspective distortion, CA. --Kadellar (talk) 10:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • It's roughly what I would expect after doing an eighth the evening before and not exhaling ( to quote an amusing joke of the lately departed Stephen Gaskin RIP). I mean the whole point about this image is that it is saturated. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 01:27, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Viborg Kraftvarmeværk NW view 2014-07-06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 23:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Viborg Power Station, Denmark
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Slaunger -- Slaunger (talk) 23:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Slaunger (talk) 23:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Very uninteresting foreground, sky and lighting. Lacks wow.Fotoriety (talk) 00:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
    • @Fotoriety: Thanks for the review. Regarding the foregound and surroundings in general I left some space around to allow the building to "breathe". For me the featureless foreground helps the main subject to stand out. Is it correct that you think it should have been cropped tighter? I am sorry you do not like the lightning. I really like it myself and how the sky and coads are partially reflected in the curved ceramic shields surrounding the building. Anyway, there are so many possibilities for taking photos of this building regarding the vantage point, time of day and weather conditions. It is almost like a chameleon to me. If you look at the other photos in Viborg power plant, are there any elements in the framing, light vantage point in some of the other shots which are worthwhile to explore further in your opinion? I live close by, so it is easy to take new shots at it. Or, are you just non-wowed by this building in general? --Slaunger (talk) 06:31, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
      • @Slaunger: It's hard to say how i would like this photo to be taken because i don't know the dynamics of the environment. However, i agree that a tighter crop would help; as would perhaps lighting such as the bright glow from a sunset also being reflected in the facade. Perhaps also if the photo could be taken at a higher level to give greater depth, that may improve the composition. However, i realise it's a power plant, so room for manoeuvre may be limited. Hope that helped.Fotoriety (talk) 01:07, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent photo! --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Pen-y-ghent from South.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 13:25:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pen-y-ghent as seen from the south
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Pennine Way and Pen-y-ghent from South – c/u/n by Kreuzschnabel -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 13:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 13:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm sorry but what is Pen-y-ghent? Could you please add a decent description? I find a good description very important when making the decision if I find a picture feature worthy. --Baykedevries (talk) 17:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment On a photograph of a mountain, I think it’s decent enough to give the mountain’s name along with the geocoding and point of view. What else do you expect? For further information just look up its name on Wikipedia. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 17:35, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I was about to say the same. A wikilink in the nom or information page is always handy but my browser has a search box. There's a geocode link too. I'd much rather nominators explained why they think the image is among our finest, which is something I can't find out for myself with a click. -- Colin (talk) 17:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sure I can do a search, but I'm not going to. If you think a picture is feature worthy you can take the time to add a decent description. For me a good description is important and At some point I'm going to ignore pictures without. I'm making a point here. Don't take it personally :) But to many pictures are missing descriptions --Baykedevries (talk) 18:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
        • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Since I haven’t understood your point yet, let me ask once again: What do you expect? Or maybe point out some of the active nominations that do have descriptions after your liking (most don’t have any at all, just "c/u/n by $NAME", without you complaining, AFAIS). I really don’t know what you mean. The picture shows the Pennine Way climbing a mountain named Pen-y-ghent from its southern side. That’s what my description says, so IMHO it’s a proper description of the photograph. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 22:22, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
          • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with Baykedevries that often file descriptions (on the file page - it is those that matters) are inadequate as important information is often missing regarding the particular image, but this is not one of those cases. The file page is adequately categorized to e.g. Pen-y-ghent and Pennine Way and if you follow those links, there are interwiki links to articles in several different languages (after I have added them, that is, as they were initially missing). If the nominator were to copy that information to the file page (in how many languages?), it would just be maintenance of redundant information. It would contaminate, not add value. I do think though that it is generally a good idea if nominators check that main categories are adequately linked to wikipedia articles, such that the relevant information can be found fast and efficient. The interwiki links are often missing on Commons categories. --Slaunger (talk) 23:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 21:54, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is a pretty picture of good quality, but it does not stand out for me as extraordinary. Background is a little soft in focus. --Slaunger (talk) 07:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pleasant composition and a reasonable QI (could be sharper). The 4:3 ratio isn't generally good for landscape IMO and it is too ordinary a result to be featurable. -- Colin (talk) 07:09, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow and the crop ratio chosen is very appropriate for a landscape IMO. --Graphium 19:48, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:James Webb Primary Mirror.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 07:25:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"NASA engineer Ernie Wright looks on as the first six flight ready James Webb Space Telescope's primary mirror segments are (prepared) to begin final cryogenic testing at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center."
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NASA/MSFC/David Higginbotham - uploaded by Originalwana - nominated by Pine -- Pine 07:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pine 07:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Fine composition but way too noisy. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 07:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Specially the scientist is noisy (it must be a very dark room and it's backlighted) but it has lots of wow and a great composition and EV. --Kadellar (talk) 09:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great image of a interesting subject. The noise doesn't bother me. For a second I thought the guy was standing in front of a giant VCR! --Baykedevries (talk) 17:08, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 21:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 01:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Composition mitigates minor technical flaws. --Slaunger (talk) 07:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 13:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:39, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Tilted, just a little bit but still needs to be fixed. Gidip (talk) 09:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Ruhrschleuse Mülheim 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 07:24:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Watergate at the river Ruhr in Mülheim
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 07:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose QI, but fail to see any special wow, lighting is not particularly interesting, the gate on approx. 1/2 of the frame is rather distracting than any special, the close lantern masts do not do the composition good either. --A.Savin 11:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose An above average picture, but not quite FP level. I agree completely with the comments by A Savin. --Slaunger (talk) 07:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Really pity that the photo does not gain support up to now. @ A.Savin and Slaunger: IMHO the composition with its symmetry and repeated elements is good enough for FP (that was the reason for the nomination) but surely I respect your comment. Another reason for nomination was that the motive is somehow different than other nominations. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing against the subject, but the composition don't work with me -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice perspective, good light. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow. --Graphium 19:51, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Nettipattam of elephant.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 05:46:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Head Mask of Elephant used in Kerala.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ranjithsiji - uploaded by Ranjithsiji - nominated by Ranjithsiji -- Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Object tilted, top side unsharp, tight crop, white parts blown. Sorry, wouldn’t even be a QI for me. Besides, the pic lacks wow because I can’t make anything of it. What kind of thing is this, and how is it used? Do elephants wear it? Would be nice to see it in use then. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 06:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. --Slaunger (talk) 07:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Object tilted and top a bit blurred -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Presqu'île du Rouens, Clermont-l'Hérault 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 05:14:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Presqu'île du Rouens, Clermont-l'Hérault, France.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Presqu'île du Rouens, Lac du Salagou, Hérault, France. All by me. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 05:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 05:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Benh, thanks to you for this image. After your comment in this page you motivated me to return on the hill. What I made on saturday and I took this photo while waiting for the last hour of the sun to take a picture of the village (it is taken from the same point of view). Unfortunately, as you can see in this image there is some clouds and just after this shoot the sun was hidden, I am quits to go back up again....:) -- Christian Ferrer Talk 05:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, but unfavorable light, washed out colors, distracting foreground. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done (for colors) New version with a bit more saturation and contrast. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 05:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting info.svg Info I was totaly wrong with the saturation, new version much less satured. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 18:11, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Malheureusement, il manque encore qq chose à mes yeux. La composition est assez simpliste, et le premier plan est en fait malvenu et n'apporte rien (contrairement à la nomination du canal ci-dessus, qui guide le regard). Ça pourrait être compensé par une jolie lumière, comme sur ta nomination précédente, mais ici, ça semble pris à 18h. À cette heure là, en été, la lumière n'est pas assez rasante et ne crée pas assez d'ombre pour donner une ambiance magique. Juste mon avis ! Quelques examples de photo pour illustrer mon propos : [1] ou [2]. Dommage qu'on ne voit pas plus de photos comme ça par ici... - Benh (talk) 21:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Anemone tomentosa 'Albadura' 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 05:10:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Beautiful swelling buds of Anemone tomentosa 'Albadura' created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request How about a tighter crop on left side to get the main object out of center? Would look more interesting. Altogether it’s a bit dull for me, maybe not the best light. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 06:16, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Tighter crop.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. Since you're doing requests, would it be possible to photoshop the spiderweb thread out? They bother me a bit. --Baykedevries (talk) 17:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Cobweb removed.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 18:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jee 03:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very good composition, but light is too dull for me to support. --Slaunger (talk) 07:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Fleuren.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I really don't like the crop. If you see here an imitation of a face with two eyes - emphasize it by more lead room on the right (if possible) and a tighter crop on the left (and maybe on bottom too). If, on the other hand, it is just a plant with no reminiscence of other things - go for an upright crop that emphasizes the shape of the plant. Gidip (talk) 09:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If I go right off the picture is more or less square (as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anemone_tomentosa_%27Albadura%27_02.JPG) because the space below is missing.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
    • I really prefer that crop! Gidip (talk) 04:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:HMS Belfast with rainbow.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2014 at 22:05:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

HMS Belfast with rainbow.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dmitry A. Mottl - uploaded by Dmottl - nominated by Dmottl -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 22:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 22:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- on this day we've all been treated to gorgeous images of Thames side in London by helicopter Tour de France, very happy to support. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 22:26, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The colors seems not natural, it lacks a lot of blue, not only on the sky and the water. As you can see in this picture the blue parts of the bridge disappeared on your image. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 18:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:11, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice for me. Even thought I would have prefer a 16:9 crop --PierreSelim (talk) 11:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fantastic. --Tupungato (talk) 16:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support What a lucky moment. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice --Famberhorst (talk) 05:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment More sharpness would be good IMO. The photo is too soft. --Graphium 19:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Natural History Museum, London (long exposure).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2014 at 20:02:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Main Hall of the Natural History Museum in London, United Kingdom
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dmitry A. Mottl - uploaded by Dmottl - nominated by Dmottl -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Striking, overall good quality, and UW angle provides a good feeling of how big it is. But the ghosts are really an issue here. There's just too many of them. - Benh (talk) 21:33, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral As with Benh. Personally I'm not scared of ghosts. If someone can persuade me that the rest of the world really shouldn't be afraid of them either, I'd be happy to support. Such an excellent image. High, high praise. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 21:59, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This is a composition of 12 individual photos :) --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 22:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because of perspective issues --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ghosts, perspective, blur at the sides --A.Savin 11:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Way to many issues with ghosts. --Slaunger (talk) 07:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Did you (or camera) combine multiple exposures?
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the top crop. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 11 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Monday James Hammarby April 2013.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2014 at 13:29:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monday James
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Nigerian professional football defender and 2008 Beijing Olympic Silver medalist Monday James during game in Sweden. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 13:29, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 13:29, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I think the background is too distracting. I would have recommended a larger aperture to get better separation between subject and background, but you are already at f/2.8, so not much to do there. Otherwise nice. --Slaunger (talk) 07:44, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Slaunger. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de los Remedios, Kotor, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 29.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2014 at 11:05:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Roman Catholic Church of Our Lady of Remedy with the city of Kotor and the homonymous bay in the background, Montenegro. The church, located in the slope of the St. John Mountain and only reacheable on foot, dates from 1518. All by me, Poco2 11:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 11:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 19:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 06:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I have a problem with the big white water part it looks blown out. For me it unbalances an otherwise very nice picture. --Baykedevries (talk) 17:29, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
    That is the reflection of the clouds and according to LR5 there is no real overexposure here. Poco2 19:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Einstein2 (talk) 16:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Cypriot statue - Neues Museum.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2014 at 08:32:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cypriot statue - Neues Museum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 08:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MrPanyGoff 08:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 18:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 06:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 07:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good work balancing the sometimes jarring contrast between the natural and artificial light one encounters with these (Is that the actual background? Or is it something you swapped in? It just looks so clean). Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the words. As for the background, no, it is not the actual one.--MrPanyGoff 07:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Borgo a Mozzano Ponte della Maddalena.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2014 at 10:44:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ponte della Maddalena, also called Ponte del Diavolo, Borgo a Mozzano, Tuscany, Italy.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Myrabella -- Myrabella (talk) 10:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
    As this image of a medieval bridge in Tuscany (the Ponte della Maddalena in Borgo a Mozzano) had some success at the May Photo challenge, I give it a try here.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Myrabella (talk) 10:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support My humble opinion: very good composition, very nice light, excellent subject with a lot of value(s). (Maybe) I've removed the electric wires in the sky by cloning out, and (maybe) a little over exposition on the white parts of the second arch (loss of details). Anyway, a FP for me.--Jebulon (talk) 15:32, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sharp, and Not enough wow because the entire bridge from end to end should have been included in the photo. Sorry. --Graphium 03:04, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Following Jebulon's advice, I have removed the electrical wires in the sky and treated the brightest areas; I have also sharpened the image a bit. --Myrabella (talk) 04:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose tight crop IMO.--Claus (talk) 07:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Claus. That was my first impression on seeing this picture. Can we see a different crop? --Baykedevries (talk) 17:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info From this bank of the river, the view on the right side is obstructed by a parapet and alas, I did not have an ultra wide angle lens yet (you can see the situation in that former FPC). So I did my best to get a composition that emphasizes the harmony of the water reflections in spite of this difficulty. However, from that bank, other compositions are possible, without an UW lens (example). I am so sorry that my photo doesn't manage to charm you, thanks for the reviews anyway :) --Myrabella (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

File:BEP-GIRSCH-Declaration of Independence (Trumbull).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2014 at 22:50:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Engraving based on Trumbull's Declaration of Independence
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Bureau of Engraving and Printing - uploaded, restored, and nominated by -- Godot13 (talk) 22:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Bureau of Engraving and Printing engraved vignette of John Trumbull’s painting Declaration of Independence (c. 1818). Engraving by Frederick Girsch. This vignette has been featured on U.S. currency beyond the $2 bill. It was the reverse of the $100 National Bank Note from roughly the 1860s to 1880s. The vignette was also on Certificates of Indebtedness in the early to mid 1900s.--Godot13 (talk) 23:05, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Godot13 (talk) 22:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High value, and of course very good timing (Happy birthday USA !). I'ved cleaned out more spots, but a very good and clear restoration, IMO. --Jebulon (talk) 15:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:22, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow. Very impressive. --Slaunger (talk) 20:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Loads of wow. Very impressive. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 18:03, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 11:22, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you give some details of the restoration technique and how was it photographed/scanned? And what did you use as the source? I think all this should be specified in the file. Gidip (talk) 18:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Added to the image file.-Godot13 (talk) 20:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Iziko Koekoe resistance beacon.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2014 at 12:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An example of some of the beacons that marked key sites in territory at the Cape claimed by the Dutch. Both are made of Robben Island slate and bear the coat-of-arms of the Netherlands (a lion with seven arrows representing the seven Dutch provinces). This beacon was found on the farm Ongegundefontein on the southern side of Olifants River mouth, near present-day Papendorp, and was donated to the South African Museum in 1893.
Pictogram voting question.svg Question Savin, what about this image would have made this image featurable and of quality?
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting subject... but uneven lighting and unsharp. --Cayambe (talk) 16:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The lighting is a one source light from above, thus the uneven nature of its look. Quality? Its 20mp image. Which part of the image lacks sharpness? In the museum with their limited light sources and the beacon secured in a glass cage, this happens to be the closest to best I could achieve with my camera.
      • The lighting would not really be a problem for me. Uneven lighting in this case enhances the readability. The image *is* unsharp, however. View the image at full resolution to see. Kleuske (talk) 08:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Hans Gadamer.png, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2014 at 16:30:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Copyleft portrait of german XX Century philosofer Hans-Georg Hadamer, developer of philosophical hermeneutics, who argued that a artwork's meaning is not reducible to the author's intentions, but is dependent on the context of interpretation.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Oto Vega Ponce - uploaded by Oto Vega Ponce - nominated by Dvdgmz -- Dvdgmz (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Remarkable and impressive portrait of the German philosopher. Similarity well achieved, quality of drawing, encyclopedic approach. - Dvdgmz (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think it is a good and valuable portrait. The stains on the paper are rather ugly though and I think an attempt should be made to make a digital restoration prior to considering nomination for FPC, sorry. --Slaunger (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
    • It isn't a deteriorated paper. The author included digitally this background to give texture to the portrait.--Dvdgmz (talk) 21:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 06:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


Contestations en cours[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Steinway & Sons upright piano, model 1098, manufactured at Steinway's factory in New York City.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2014 at 21:48:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Upright piano made in the United States

File:Tartu raudteejaama veetorn, 2010.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2014 at 19:33:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water tower at Tartu railway station

File:Jacques-Louis David - The Emperor Napoleon in His Study at the Tuileries - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2014 at 16:41:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Jacques-Louis David - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Claus -- Claus (talk) 16:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus (talk) 16:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- The Google Art Project image slightly better than the NGA high resolution image. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 21:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:La Vierge au voile, by Raffaello Sanzio, from C2RMF retouched.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2014 at 16:36:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Raphael - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by Claus -- Claus (talk) 16:36, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Claus (talk) 16:36, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment -- Looks to me a copy of the VintPrint poster. The restoration is not documented and it looks pretty inauthentic to me. I really can't support this. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 21:44, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
    • A copy of the VintPrint poster??? Please see the source or the filename.--Claus (talk) 02:33, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
      • Coat, I'd be willing to bet my house that VintPrint downloaded the full image from here and is marketing prints derived from (if not the exact same as) this file. I know DCoetzee's work, and I know how exacting he can be (check out his upload of the Mona Lisa). This file is definitely from C2RMF. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I love this image and the resolution it's in. Perhaps not as famous as the Mona Lisa, but to me the painting is well composed and interesting. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Nave of the Ste Cécile Cathedral - 2014-02-22.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2014 at 14:26:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nave and Ceiling of the Cathedral Ste Cécile in Albi, France
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info HDR interior of Albi's cathedral in France. It is said to be a very simple cathedral without lots of details and ornaments in order to convinced the unfaithfuls. — (c/u/n) all by PierreSelim -- PierreSelim (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PierreSelim (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment ccw tilt and underexposure should be fixed at least. On a personal taste, The perspective is quite interesting, but I would try to fix verticals, and crop most of the top if necessary. The star here is the rood screen, I wouldn't take the viewer's eyes away from it. (message personnel, si tu as une photo haute résolution prise du même endroit, de la partie inférieure gauche, je suis très intéressé pour boucher un trou d'un panorama que j'ai pris de ce même Jubé il y a 6 ans ! Je n'ai rien trouvé sur Gogole... ) - Benh (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Happy to support if some the technical considerations above are addressed, and on this occasion certainly the tilt. Metadata doesn't indicate any digital processing at all. It could benefit from some. Not sure I would want to see the top cropped. That's one of the most interesting thing about the image, which is generally extremely fine I think and should meet the criteria if some work is done on it. 16:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Veluwse Papiermolen in het Openluchtmuseum van Arnhem.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 22:55:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dutch papermill from 1654 on display in the Arnhem open air museum.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Uberprutser - uploaded by Uberprutser - nominated by [[User:Uberprutser}|]] -- Uberprutser (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Uberprutser (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Some time ago I tried to get this version featured but unfortunately a lot of people disliked the cut of reflection. So is this one better? --Uberprutser (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Haven't looked at the original, but this is absolutely beautiful. High, high praise. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 01:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice comp but looks definitely overexposed to me (right side of building). Top/bottom crop very tight while too much empty space on the right, maybe portrait orientation or square framing would have done better. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment You say nice comp but then start to complain about empty space and a tight crop, aren't those mutually exclusive? If I had under exposed the image chances are you would complain about noise in the shadow areas. Your own eyes would have had a hard time seeing some details on the right side of the building. So a view overexposed patches seem rather natural to me. Sigh. --Uberprutser (talk) 12:18, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


Alternative:

Dutch papermill from 1654 on display in the Arnhem open air museum.

File:Paris Canal St-Martin écluses Récollets 2013.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 18:52:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Canal St-Martin, Paris.

File:Scharfer Korkstacheling Hydnellum peckii jung.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 17:33:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too dark and hardly any subject isolation. --Uberprutser (talk) 18:05, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Alise-Sainte-Reine statue Vercingetorix par Millet large.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 12:03:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Chateau Luynes.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 11:57:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by Myrabella - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 12:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 13:30, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think it's shot (cropped) a bit to tight. --Uberprutser (talk) 14:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info I uploaded sharper version. Please revert, if it's not better. --Ivar (talk) 16:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 17:17, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 22:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support @Tomer T: Once again, thank you so much, Tomer! @Iifar: Yes, I find it better with your editing, thank you! I am used to be light with sharpening (if any) but your edit is perfectly fine by me. --Myrabella (talk) 08:57, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:36, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Lilium bulbiferum var. bulbiferum 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 10:19:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fire lily (Lilium bulbiferum var. bulbiferum)

File:VIS - Vienna Independent Shorts 2014 Stadtkino Künstlerhaus Jennifer Reeder.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 09:20:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Filmmaker Jennifer Reeder at film festival Vienna Independent Shorts 2014
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, nominated by Tsui -- Tsui (talk) 09:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tsui (talk) 09:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support it seems a bit dark at low resolution, but very nice at full, I like very much the DoF and the focus point -- Christian Ferrer Talk 10:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Sukhoi SuperJet 100 (5114478300).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2014 at 04:53:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment 10.664 MP, 2.6 MB → can't see anything wrong with that? --El Grafo (talk) 17:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ivar (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --El Grafo (talk) 17:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fantastic to see others seeing SuperJet International's photos are featured quality. Can only support this too. russavia (talk) 17:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 08:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Mary, Queen of Scots after Nicholas Hilliard.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2014 at 22:48:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Photo, painting of Mary, Queen of Scots
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by unknown after Nicholas Hilliard - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by Nobelpeopleuploader -- Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I uploaded Hilliards's miniature of Queen Elizabeth I to Commons myself earlier this year. There seems to me to be a couple of issues here: 1 this is a Coetzee bequest image. I'm not sure it's best diplomatic we nominate these images as "Featured" right now 2 are we really going to list every high resolution image of a work of art as "Featured"? They must now run into their tens of thousands if we take account of Google Art Project and galleries such as NGA Washington, Rijksmuseum, and the Prado, to name but just three that come to mind that make available high resolution images, and then both the major auctioneers and others, as well as a host of smaller institutions who take no special steps against stitching their high resolution tiles. I'm inclined to think we should up the bar for art works to "ultra high resolution", such as this one, a van Gogh Sunflowers I recently nominated at Wikipedia Featured Pictures. One interesting thing about Google Art Project images is that fine as they are, they rarely approach the best available from their source museums. This is so for the van Gogh I nominated. That one comes from the Van Gogh Museum as you can readily check by going to the appropriate museum page. It's much superior to the Google Art project version. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 23:45, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:01 Antequera, Andalusia, Spain.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2014 at 16:30:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Royal Collegiate Church of Santa María la Mayor in Antequera, Andalusia, Spain with view of Antequera town on the right.
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Royal Collegiate Church of Santa María la Mayor in Antequera, Andalusia, Spain with view of Antequera town on the right, created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 16:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC) (renomination after I accidentally added three active nominations)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tupungato (talk) 16:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine image. No boring straight form the front shot. Although some of the white buildings seem to be a bit overexposed. But thats fine since human eyes probably would have a hard time seeing any details under similar lighting conditions. --Baykedevries (talk) 17:28, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Budapest, St. Stephen's Basilica C12.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2014 at 02:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Stephen's Basilica in Budapest, Hungary
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by CLI - nominated by Nikhil -- Nikhil (talk) 02:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nikhil (talk) 02:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent (BTW, this is marked with a tag suggesting it was taken in the U.S. Perhaps that could be corrected). Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In recent times we had a lot of nominations of church windows (party techincally at a very high level). My everlasting problem with such nominations is, that the personal contribution of the photographer is difficult to recognize in that case. From a technical perspective the photo here is imho only average. It looks rather soft and on the left side there are bright border areas which are distracting. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:10, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Agreed with Tuxyso, and I’d like the sides to be vertical (if they are in reality as I suppose). --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 07:35, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Splendid image. Stained glass an accepted 2-D category on Commons. Can't follow "personal contribution". Of course if the editor knows it's not a faithful representation, that's another matter. No reason to suppose that is so here. Straight enough for me. Perfectly straight probably too straight. All these fantastically straight images ultimately tedious IMHO. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 08:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent photo of a beautiful object. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 06:17, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kolonáda na Rajstně (Reistenkolonnade) - by Pudelek.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2014 at 22:21:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reistna colonnade, Valtice (Feldsberg), Czech Republic

File:Sarah Vaughan - William P. Gottlieb - No. 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2014 at 21:02:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sarah Vaughan
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by William P. Gottlieb - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Last nomination got six out of the seven supports needed for a quorum. As it is featured on four different Wikipedias, I suspect it's suited for Commons as well, despite the minor flaws of a candid photograph. And it's taken by a notable photographer, so that's a plus. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Yes, and a very striking portrait. Lovely. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The flying saucer that is trying to kidnap her is rather distracting. Would editing that out affect EV? Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:10, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
I would support editing it out providing it's a documented separate file linked to the original. I'm not sure it can be within the guidelines. And besides maybe she was really being 'lifted'... It is pretty intrusive I have to admit. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 08:07, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
It's something I'd like to remove, but which would be misleading to. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Misleading to whom? No one would care, as the image is about her not some murky prop in the background. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:5 boerenzwaluwen op een rijtje.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2014 at 20:32:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

5 young barn swallows sitting in a nest that was build in a birdwatchers shed.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by baykedevries - uploaded by baykedevries - nominated by baykedevries -- Baykedevries (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Baykedevries (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very "lucky" moment regarding the arrangement of the chicks and good composition. I do not like the frontal flash light and the background though, sorry. Still a nice shot though. --Slaunger (talk) 21:05, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree, the flash light is a bit harsh. But it was very dark in the shed, the camera had a hard time focusing, and the build in flash was all I had. Maybe I should get one of those softboxes that fit over the build in flash, that shouldn't take up much room in my small camera bag. Next nesting season I will be prepared :) --Baykedevries (talk) 13:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Good idea! For a related FP pose check this gem, especially the detail about the fifth friend gone missing:-) --Slaunger (talk) 14:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment High praise, doesn't quite make the cut for me. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 01:32, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Graphium 19:46, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 20:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Monumento a la Libertad, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 13.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2014 at 19:50:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Freedom Monument is a memorial honouring soldiers killed during the Latvian War of Independence (1918–1920) located in Riga, capital of Latvia. The 42m high monument is considered an important symbol of the freedom, independence, and sovereignty of Latvia. It was unveiled in 1935 and is made of granite, travertine and copper.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Freedom Monument is a memorial honouring soldiers killed during the Latvian War of Independence (1918–1920) located in Riga, capital of Latvia. The 42m high monument is considered an important symbol of the freedom, independence, and sovereignty of Latvia. It was unveiled in 1935 and is made of granite, travertine and copper. This is a re-nomination (see first one here) after having addressed the mentioned issues back then. All by me, Poco2 19:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 19:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's a fine image and I'm happy to support editors who make the effort to upload their images. I do get all that stuff about saturation and frankly I don't give give a damn. And that sky is gorgeous. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 00:17, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment How about FoP in this case? Latvia is not the "FoPest" place on Earth :) --Kikos (talk) 04:49, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
    We are lucky in this case. Kārlis Zāle, the author of the work, died in 1942, and therefore more than 70 years ago (see section 36 of the latvian copyright law) Poco2 08:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request @Poco a poco: could you please note that for future reference somewhere at the file description page (+ maybe at the main category)? Thanks, --El Grafo (talk) 12:45, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
    Good idea, ✓ Done Poco2 21:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 14:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 10:48, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Toris inari 7.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2014 at 11:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Pundit - I got absolutely fascinated by this shrine complex in Fushimi Inari Torii in Kyoto. What do you think? -- Pundit (talk) 11:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as nom/creator. Pundit (talk) 12:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good solution to what is evidently quite a difficult composition judging from the category. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 17:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm supporting everything orange today.

Good luck. I'll be watching myself. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 17:51, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice comp, but the green leaves outside look heavily and unnaturally oversaturated to me. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 19:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Massively oversaturated (take a look on the histrogram of the red chanel), perspective issues. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
So is Van Gogh's Sunflowers. What exactly is the perspective issue here? It's 18mm on a f3.5 lens, pretty standard. Looks fine to me. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 08:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Take a look at the bottom of the columns at the left side - they look rather distorted. The columns are not fully straight in real but also not that converging as the photo implies (take a look on other photos in the same catgegory). But the main reason for my oppose is the massively blown red channel not the perspective. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Colors are definitely in vivid mode and may be overdone, I'm curious though what could I have possibly do better next time to make the columns more straight? Do you think that the lenses distorted the actual view? Pundit (talk) 09:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Have you used a tripod in combination with a leveler? Have you done any perspective corrections on the computer or is the photo "out of the cam"? --Tuxyso (talk) 11:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
I have Nikon Capture NX2 and it's default Distortion control of 10% has a barely noticeable effect on the image. The saturation isn't "massive". It's comfortably within 10% in NX2 I would say and a glance at the category confirms the image is not deceiving the viewer, the FP criterion. There's no such thing as the "right" image in photography (lesson 1) and I'm worried that criticism at this level might be alienating ordinary contributors with realtively unsophisticated equipment or resources. It's essentially elitist in my view, and while it has it may have place amongst established contributors of images on Commons, I do think we should be wary of discouraging new contributors. The image looks great. End of. And my comment about composition is quite right, as you can readily confirm looking through the category. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 14:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
There’s no such thing as "the image looks great" (lesson 2), it just may look great for you. Please allow others to have entirely different views and opinions. And de gustibus non est disputandum. For instance, I don’t approve of candy colours at all. My nomination of Pen-y-ghent from the east looks great too for me, but nobody seems to like it. So what? --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 14:21, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Called "wow" here (lesson 3, there really is such a thing). You're not raising issues of taste but technical matters as if they preclude nomination prima facie . And of your two nominations of Pen-y-ghent I supported the first but not the second from the east, which is quite ordinary lacking all wow. What I didn't do was post an "oppose" saying it was nothing special in my own view and opinion to which I'm surely entitled. I would only do that, and probably as a comment, if I felt the image was receiving inordinate praise. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 17:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
No perspective corrections or tripod, I leaned the camera on one of the poles of stability. Pundit (talk) 11:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Colors are over saturated and when you tilt the lens you will gets perspective distortion. When it looks good, what's the problem? Seems like that perspective is the new noise to complain about. --Baykedevries (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it. --Baykedevries (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Despite the very short description? :-P --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
You're right. I apologize for my rant and inconsistencies. I'll try to do better. --Baykedevries (talk) 17:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Strong oversaturation, perspective distortion, CA. --Kadellar (talk) 10:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • It's roughly what I would expect after doing an eighth the evening before and not exhaling ( to quote an amusing joke of the lately departed Stephen Gaskin RIP). I mean the whole point about this image is that it is saturated. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 01:27, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Viborg Kraftvarmeværk NW view 2014-07-06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 23:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Viborg Power Station, Denmark
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by Slaunger -- Slaunger (talk) 23:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Slaunger (talk) 23:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Very uninteresting foreground, sky and lighting. Lacks wow.Fotoriety (talk) 00:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
    • @Fotoriety: Thanks for the review. Regarding the foregound and surroundings in general I left some space around to allow the building to "breathe". For me the featureless foreground helps the main subject to stand out. Is it correct that you think it should have been cropped tighter? I am sorry you do not like the lightning. I really like it myself and how the sky and coads are partially reflected in the curved ceramic shields surrounding the building. Anyway, there are so many possibilities for taking photos of this building regarding the vantage point, time of day and weather conditions. It is almost like a chameleon to me. If you look at the other photos in Viborg power plant, are there any elements in the framing, light vantage point in some of the other shots which are worthwhile to explore further in your opinion? I live close by, so it is easy to take new shots at it. Or, are you just non-wowed by this building in general? --Slaunger (talk) 06:31, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
      • @Slaunger: It's hard to say how i would like this photo to be taken because i don't know the dynamics of the environment. However, i agree that a tighter crop would help; as would perhaps lighting such as the bright glow from a sunset also being reflected in the facade. Perhaps also if the photo could be taken at a higher level to give greater depth, that may improve the composition. However, i realise it's a power plant, so room for manoeuvre may be limited. Hope that helped.Fotoriety (talk) 01:07, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent photo! --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Pen-y-ghent from South.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 13:25:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pen-y-ghent as seen from the south
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Pennine Way and Pen-y-ghent from South – c/u/n by Kreuzschnabel -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 13:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 13:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm sorry but what is Pen-y-ghent? Could you please add a decent description? I find a good description very important when making the decision if I find a picture feature worthy. --Baykedevries (talk) 17:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment On a photograph of a mountain, I think it’s decent enough to give the mountain’s name along with the geocoding and point of view. What else do you expect? For further information just look up its name on Wikipedia. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 17:35, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I was about to say the same. A wikilink in the nom or information page is always handy but my browser has a search box. There's a geocode link too. I'd much rather nominators explained why they think the image is among our finest, which is something I can't find out for myself with a click. -- Colin (talk) 17:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sure I can do a search, but I'm not going to. If you think a picture is feature worthy you can take the time to add a decent description. For me a good description is important and At some point I'm going to ignore pictures without. I'm making a point here. Don't take it personally :) But to many pictures are missing descriptions --Baykedevries (talk) 18:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
        • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Since I haven’t understood your point yet, let me ask once again: What do you expect? Or maybe point out some of the active nominations that do have descriptions after your liking (most don’t have any at all, just "c/u/n by $NAME", without you complaining, AFAIS). I really don’t know what you mean. The picture shows the Pennine Way climbing a mountain named Pen-y-ghent from its southern side. That’s what my description says, so IMHO it’s a proper description of the photograph. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 22:22, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
          • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with Baykedevries that often file descriptions (on the file page - it is those that matters) are inadequate as important information is often missing regarding the particular image, but this is not one of those cases. The file page is adequately categorized to e.g. Pen-y-ghent and Pennine Way and if you follow those links, there are interwiki links to articles in several different languages (after I have added them, that is, as they were initially missing). If the nominator were to copy that information to the file page (in how many languages?), it would just be maintenance of redundant information. It would contaminate, not add value. I do think though that it is generally a good idea if nominators check that main categories are adequately linked to wikipedia articles, such that the relevant information can be found fast and efficient. The interwiki links are often missing on Commons categories. --Slaunger (talk) 23:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 21:54, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is a pretty picture of good quality, but it does not stand out for me as extraordinary. Background is a little soft in focus. --Slaunger (talk) 07:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pleasant composition and a reasonable QI (could be sharper). The 4:3 ratio isn't generally good for landscape IMO and it is too ordinary a result to be featurable. -- Colin (talk) 07:09, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow and the crop ratio chosen is very appropriate for a landscape IMO. --Graphium 19:48, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:James Webb Primary Mirror.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 07:25:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"NASA engineer Ernie Wright looks on as the first six flight ready James Webb Space Telescope's primary mirror segments are (prepared) to begin final cryogenic testing at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center."
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by NASA/MSFC/David Higginbotham - uploaded by Originalwana - nominated by Pine -- Pine 07:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pine 07:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Fine composition but way too noisy. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 07:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Specially the scientist is noisy (it must be a very dark room and it's backlighted) but it has lots of wow and a great composition and EV. --Kadellar (talk) 09:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great image of a interesting subject. The noise doesn't bother me. For a second I thought the guy was standing in front of a giant VCR! --Baykedevries (talk) 17:08, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 21:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 01:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Composition mitigates minor technical flaws. --Slaunger (talk) 07:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kikos (talk) 13:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:39, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Tilted, just a little bit but still needs to be fixed. Gidip (talk) 09:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Ruhrschleuse Mülheim 2014.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 07:24:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Watergate at the river Ruhr in Mülheim
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 07:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose QI, but fail to see any special wow, lighting is not particularly interesting, the gate on approx. 1/2 of the frame is rather distracting than any special, the close lantern masts do not do the composition good either. --A.Savin 11:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose An above average picture, but not quite FP level. I agree completely with the comments by A Savin. --Slaunger (talk) 07:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Really pity that the photo does not gain support up to now. @ A.Savin and Slaunger: IMHO the composition with its symmetry and repeated elements is good enough for FP (that was the reason for the nomination) but surely I respect your comment. Another reason for nomination was that the motive is somehow different than other nominations. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing against the subject, but the composition don't work with me -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice perspective, good light. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No wow. --Graphium 19:51, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Nettipattam of elephant.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 05:46:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Head Mask of Elephant used in Kerala.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Ranjithsiji - uploaded by Ranjithsiji - nominated by Ranjithsiji -- Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Object tilted, top side unsharp, tight crop, white parts blown. Sorry, wouldn’t even be a QI for me. Besides, the pic lacks wow because I can’t make anything of it. What kind of thing is this, and how is it used? Do elephants wear it? Would be nice to see it in use then. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 06:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. --Slaunger (talk) 07:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Object tilted and top a bit blurred -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Presqu'île du Rouens, Clermont-l'Hérault 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 05:14:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Presqu'île du Rouens, Clermont-l'Hérault, France.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Presqu'île du Rouens, Lac du Salagou, Hérault, France. All by me. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 05:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 05:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Benh, thanks to you for this image. After your comment in this page you motivated me to return on the hill. What I made on saturday and I took this photo while waiting for the last hour of the sun to take a picture of the village (it is taken from the same point of view). Unfortunately, as you can see in this image there is some clouds and just after this shoot the sun was hidden, I am quits to go back up again....:) -- Christian Ferrer Talk 05:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sorry, but unfavorable light, washed out colors, distracting foreground. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done (for colors) New version with a bit more saturation and contrast. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 05:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting info.svg Info I was totaly wrong with the saturation, new version much less satured. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 18:11, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Malheureusement, il manque encore qq chose à mes yeux. La composition est assez simpliste, et le premier plan est en fait malvenu et n'apporte rien (contrairement à la nomination du canal ci-dessus, qui guide le regard). Ça pourrait être compensé par une jolie lumière, comme sur ta nomination précédente, mais ici, ça semble pris à 18h. À cette heure là, en été, la lumière n'est pas assez rasante et ne crée pas assez d'ombre pour donner une ambiance magique. Juste mon avis ! Quelques examples de photo pour illustrer mon propos : [3] ou [4]. Dommage qu'on ne voit pas plus de photos comme ça par ici... - Benh (talk) 21:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Anemone tomentosa 'Albadura' 01.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2014 at 05:10:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Beautiful swelling buds of Anemone tomentosa 'Albadura' created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request How about a tighter crop on left side to get the main object out of center? Would look more interesting. Altogether it’s a bit dull for me, maybe not the best light. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 06:16, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Tighter crop.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice. Since you're doing requests, would it be possible to photoshop the spiderweb thread out? They bother me a bit. --Baykedevries (talk) 17:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Cobweb removed.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk 18:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Jee 03:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very good composition, but light is too dull for me to support. --Slaunger (talk) 07:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Fleuren.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I really don't like the crop. If you see here an imitation of a face with two eyes - emphasize it by more lead room on the right (if possible) and a tighter crop on the left (and maybe on bottom too). If, on the other hand, it is just a plant with no reminiscence of other things - go for an upright crop that emphasizes the shape of the plant. Gidip (talk) 09:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If I go right off the picture is more or less square (as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anemone_tomentosa_%27Albadura%27_02.JPG) because the space below is missing.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
    • I really prefer that crop! Gidip (talk) 04:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:HMS Belfast with rainbow.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2014 at 22:05:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

HMS Belfast with rainbow.jpg
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dmitry A. Mottl - uploaded by Dmottl - nominated by Dmottl -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 22:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 22:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- on this day we've all been treated to gorgeous images of Thames side in London by helicopter Tour de France, very happy to support. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 22:26, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The colors seems not natural, it lacks a lot of blue, not only on the sky and the water. As you can see in this picture the blue parts of the bridge disappeared on your image. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 18:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:11, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice for me. Even thought I would have prefer a 16:9 crop --PierreSelim (talk) 11:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fantastic. --Tupungato (talk) 16:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support What a lucky moment. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 22:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice --Famberhorst (talk) 05:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment More sharpness would be good IMO. The photo is too soft. --Graphium 19:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Natural History Museum, London (long exposure).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2014 at 20:02:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Main Hall of the Natural History Museum in London, United Kingdom
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Dmitry A. Mottl - uploaded by Dmottl - nominated by Dmottl -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Striking, overall good quality, and UW angle provides a good feeling of how big it is. But the ghosts are really an issue here. There's just too many of them. - Benh (talk) 21:33, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral As with Benh. Personally I'm not scared of ghosts. If someone can persuade me that the rest of the world really shouldn't be afraid of them either, I'd be happy to support. Such an excellent image. High, high praise. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 21:59, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info This is a composition of 12 individual photos :) --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 22:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because of perspective issues --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:09, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Ghosts, perspective, blur at the sides --A.Savin 11:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Way to many issues with ghosts. --Slaunger (talk) 07:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Did you (or camera) combine multiple exposures?
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the top crop. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 11 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Monday James Hammarby April 2013.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2014 at 13:29:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monday James
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Nigerian professional football defender and 2008 Beijing Olympic Silver medalist Monday James during game in Sweden. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 13:29, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ArildV (talk) 13:29, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, I think the background is too distracting. I would have recommended a larger aperture to get better separation between subject and background, but you are already at f/2.8, so not much to do there. Otherwise nice. --Slaunger (talk) 07:44, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Slaunger. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de los Remedios, Kotor, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 29.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2014 at 11:05:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info The Roman Catholic Church of Our Lady of Remedy with the city of Kotor and the homonymous bay in the background, Montenegro. The church, located in the slope of the St. John Mountain and only reacheable on foot, dates from 1518. All by me, Poco2 11:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco2 11:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 19:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 06:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I have a problem with the big white water part it looks blown out. For me it unbalances an otherwise very nice picture. --Baykedevries (talk) 17:29, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
    That is the reflection of the clouds and according to LR5 there is no real overexposure here. Poco2 19:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Einstein2 (talk) 16:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Cypriot statue - Neues Museum.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2014 at 08:32:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cypriot statue - Neues Museum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 08:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MrPanyGoff 08:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Coat of Many Colours (talk) 18:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 06:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yann (talk) 07:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good work balancing the sometimes jarring contrast between the natural and artificial light one encounters with these (Is that the actual background? Or is it something you swapped in? It just looks so clean). Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the words. As for the background, no, it is not the actual one.--MrPanyGoff 07:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Borgo a Mozzano Ponte della Maddalena.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2014 at 10:44:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ponte della Maddalena, also called Ponte del Diavolo, Borgo a Mozzano, Tuscany, Italy.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by Myrabella -- Myrabella (talk) 10:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
    As this image of a medieval bridge in Tuscany (the Ponte della Maddalena in Borgo a Mozzano) had some success at the May Photo challenge, I give it a try here.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Myrabella (talk) 10:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support My humble opinion: very good composition, very nice light, excellent subject with a lot of value(s). (Maybe) I've removed the electric wires in the sky by cloning out, and (maybe) a little over exposition on the white parts of the second arch (loss of details). Anyway, a FP for me.--Jebulon (talk) 15:32, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sharp, and Not enough wow because the entire bridge from end to end should have been included in the photo. Sorry. --Graphium 03:04, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Following Jebulon's advice, I have removed the electrical wires in the sky and treated the brightest areas; I have also sharpened the image a bit. --Myrabella (talk) 04:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose tight crop IMO.--Claus (talk) 07:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Claus. That was my first impression on seeing this picture. Can we see a different crop? --Baykedevries (talk) 17:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info From this bank of the river, the view on the right side is obstructed by a parapet and alas, I did not have an ultra wide angle lens yet (you can see the situation in that former FPC). So I did my best to get a composition that emphasizes the harmony of the water reflections in spite of this difficulty. However, from that bank, other compositions are possible, without an UW lens (example). I am so sorry that my photo doesn't manage to charm you, thanks for the reviews anyway :) --Myrabella (talk) 10:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

File:BEP-GIRSCH-Declaration of Independence (Trumbull).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2014 at 22:50:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Engraving based on Trumbull's Declaration of Independence
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Bureau of Engraving and Printing - uploaded, restored, and nominated by -- Godot13 (talk) 22:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Bureau of Engraving and Printing engraved vignette of John Trumbull’s painting Declaration of Independence (c. 1818). Engraving by Frederick Girsch. This vignette has been featured on U.S. currency beyond the $2 bill. It was the reverse of the $100 National Bank Note from roughly the 1860s to 1880s. The vignette was also on Certificates of Indebtedness in the early to mid 1900s.--Godot13 (talk) 23:05, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Godot13 (talk) 22:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support High value, and of course very good timing (Happy birthday USA !). I'ved cleaned out more spots, but a very good and clear restoration, IMO. --Jebulon (talk) 15:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:22, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Wow. Very impressive. --Slaunger (talk) 20:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Loads of wow. Very impressive. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 18:03, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Schnobby (talk) 11:22, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you give some details of the restoration technique and how was it photographed/scanned? And what did you use as the source? I think all this should be specified in the file. Gidip (talk) 18:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Added to the image file.-Godot13 (talk) 20:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Iziko Koekoe resistance beacon.JPG[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2014 at 12:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An example of some of the beacons that marked key sites in territory at the Cape claimed by the Dutch. Both are made of Robben Island slate and bear the coat-of-arms of the Netherlands (a lion with seven arrows representing the seven Dutch provinces). This beacon was found on the farm Ongegundefontein on the southern side of Olifants River mouth, near present-day Papendorp, and was donated to the South African Museum in 1893.
Pictogram voting question.svg Question Savin, what about this image would have made this image featurable and of quality?
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Interesting subject... but uneven lighting and unsharp. --Cayambe (talk) 16:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The lighting is a one source light from above, thus the uneven nature of its look. Quality? Its 20mp image. Which part of the image lacks sharpness? In the museum with their limited light sources and the beacon secured in a glass cage, this happens to be the closest to best I could achieve with my camera.
      • The lighting would not really be a problem for me. Uneven lighting in this case enhances the readability. The image *is* unsharp, however. View the image at full resolution to see. Kleuske (talk) 08:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Hans Gadamer.png, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2014 at 16:30:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Copyleft portrait of german XX Century philosofer Hans-Georg Hadamer, developer of philosophical hermeneutics, who argued that a artwork's meaning is not reducible to the author's intentions, but is dependent on the context of interpretation.
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Oto Vega Ponce - uploaded by Oto Vega Ponce - nominated by Dvdgmz -- Dvdgmz (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Remarkable and impressive portrait of the German philosopher. Similarity well achieved, quality of drawing, encyclopedic approach. - Dvdgmz (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think it is a good and valuable portrait. The stains on the paper are rather ugly though and I think an attempt should be made to make a digital restoration prior to considering nomination for FPC, sorry. --Slaunger (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
    • It isn't a deteriorated paper. The author included digitally this background to give texture to the portrait.--Dvdgmz (talk) 21:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 06:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


Planning (9e jour après proposition)[edit]

Fri 4 Jul → Sun 13 Jul
Sat 5 Jul → Mon 14 Jul
Sun 6 Jul → Tue 15 Jul
Mon 7 Jul → Wed 16 Jul
Tue 8 Jul → Thu 17 Jul
Wed 9 Jul → Fri 18 Jul
Thu 10 Jul → Sat 19 Jul
Fri 11 Jul → Sun 20 Jul
Sat 12 Jul → Mon 21 Jul
Sun 13 Jul → Tue 22 Jul